Skip to main content
Download PDF

EvaLuation of early CRRT and beta-blocker InTervention in patients with ECMO (ELITE) trial: study protocol for a 2 × 2 partial factorial randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 23, Article number: 684 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In critically ill patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, early initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and beta-blockade of catecholamine-induced inotropic effects may improve outcomes.

Methods

A 2 × 2 partial factorial randomized controlled trial in eligible ECMO patients without a clear indication or contraindication to either intervention is centrally randomly assigned to (A) early or conventional-indicated CRRT and/or (B) beta-blocker or usual care. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 30 days for both arms. A total of 496 participants provides 80% power to determine a 20% risk reduction in mortality at 30 days with 5% type I error.

Discussion

This trial will help define the role of early CRRT and beta-blockade in ECMO patients. There have been 89 patients enrolled at 10 hospitals in study A and is ongoing. However, study B was stopped in August 2019 in the absence of any patients being enrolled.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT03549923. Registered on 8 June 2018. World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTEP) network. The Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital Approval ID is 2018013.

Peer Review reports

Background

Introduction

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides short-term circulatory support for critically ill patients with severe cardiac shock, but mortality remains high (60 to 75%) [1] and acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) are frequent complications [2, 3] that are managed with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) [3,4,5,6]. However, the optimal timing of CRRT is uncertain: the positive results of the early vs late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (the ELAIN) trial [7] were not confirmed in another study, the Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury (AKIKI) [8]. As critically ill patients have excessive sympathetic activation and autonomic dysfunction from high circulating catecholamines that may compromise cardiac function [9,10,11,12,13,14], beta-blockade could improve outcomes by improving myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular remodeling, and left ventricular function [15, 16]. A randomized, open, single-center study in patients with septic shock requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure showed a benefit of esmolol on 28-day mortality [17]. The circulatory support offered by ECMO may avoid the negative inotropic effect of beta-blockers in the setting of cardiogenic shock [18]. We designed the EvaLuation of early CRRT and beta-blocker InTervention in patients with ECMO (ELITE) trial to determine the effects of early CRRT versus conventionally indicated CRRT and/or beta-blockade on top of routine care.

Objective

The objective is to determine whether (A) early CRRT compared to conventional-indicated CRRT and (B) beta-blockade with esmolol compared to standard treatment will reduce 30-day mortality in ECMO patients.

Methods

Study design (Fig. 1)

ELITE is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, with a 2 × 2 partial factorial design to evaluate whether early CRRT support and beta-blockade will reduce 30-day mortality in a broad range of ECMO patients admitted to hospitals in China from July 2018. In arm A, patients are randomized to early CRRT within 24 h of initiation of ECMO or to control, regardless of whether there is a conventional indication, or to the control where patients only receive CRRT according to a conventional indication. In arm B, patients are randomized to the intravenous esmolol group or usual care. The trial design and protocol adhere to the Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) criteria [19] (Table 1) and checklist in Table 5 in Appendix. The study is planned to enroll patients from 10 centers in China (see Table 5 in Appendix for the hospital list).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design. CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive care unit; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Full size image
Table 1 Study period
Full size table

Eligibility

The broad inclusion criteria are used for both arms, whereby adult patients who have received ECMO for any reason within 24 h and 7 days, for arms A and arm B, respectively, are eligible (Tables 2 and 3). Patients are excluded from arms A and B if they had a definite indication or contraindication to either CRRT or beta-blockers, respectively. As ECMO is often initiated by a specialist team to rescue and transfer patients to larger hospitals in China, a timeframe of 24 h after ECMO implantation was used for early CRRT in arm A, while a relatively stable hemodynamic status (dopamine/dobutamine < 5 μg/kg/min, with no administration of adrenaline or norepinephrine) and within 7 days after initiation of ECMO was required for eligibility into arm B. Identification of potentially eligible patients is the responsibility of the ECMO team in participating centers. After ECMO implantation or when the patient is transferred to the participating center, eligibility for study arm A will be assessed. Prior to 7 days after ECMO implantation, when patients are stable on ECMO, eligibility for study arm B will be assessed.

Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study A
Full size table
Table 3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study B
Full size table

Randomization

All eligible patients are centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either early CRRT or conventional indication CRRT, and/or beta-blocker group or usual care (control) groups, via a computer-generated randomization schedule, stratified by age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65 years) and implantation of ECMO for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (yes vs no). The sequence of randomization is generated by an independent statistician, using SAS version 9.4. Investigators use a cellphone application to confirm eligibility and obtain the randomized treatment allocation.

Interventions

Patients assigned to early CRRT should have it applied concurrently with ECMO treatment and continued for ≥ 12 h. Those assigned to standard therapy should receive CRRT according to the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for AKI stage 3 and have at least one of the following criteria met: severe hyperkalemia (> 6.5 mmol/L), metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.2), pulmonary edema unresponsive to diuretic therapy, requiring oxygen flow rate of > 5L/min to maintain an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of > 95% or requiring a forced inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) of > 50% on ventilation, blood urea nitrogen level > 112 mg/dL, or oliguria (urine output < 200 mL per 12 h) for > 72 h. CRRT can be initiated or discontinued according to the attending clinician’s decision in managing the patient.

In arm B, patients assigned to the intervention group are to receive a continuous infusion of esmolol on top of conventional management, commencing at 25 mg/h and increasing by 25 mg/h every 20 min until the heart rate is reduced to 75 ± 5 bpm or an upper dose limit of 2000 mg/h is reached. Esmolol infusion should be continued to maintain the heart rate threshold or according to the clinician’s discretion until discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) (or death, if sooner). Oral beta-blockers should be introduced before esmolol is withdrawn. Esmolol can be transiently stopped or completely withdrawn should a patient develops third-degree atrial-ventricular block, bradycardia (< 60 bpm), extreme left ventricular systolic dysfunction, aortic valve dysfunction, or severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Patients in the control group will not receive any type of beta-blockers, unless the clinician considers there is a strong indication. Concomitant diseases will be treated following the current guidelines.

Outcomes

The proportion of all-cause mortality at 30 days will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Survival data will be collected through telephone follow-up. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at 365 days; use of long-term RRT; success in weaning from ECMO, defined as survival after 24 h from weaning; health-related quality of life according to scores on the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire at 365 days; length of stay at ICU and hospital; unplanned hospital readmission; and separately on cardiac and non-cardiac death.

Severe adverse events (SAEs), such as major bleeding, cardiac arrhythmias, ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infection, surgical site infection, limb ischemia from any cause, and ischemic or hematologic stroke will be collected systemically. Any other SAEs determined by the physicians through spontaneous reporting (Table 4 outlines SAE definitions). The publication will detail each documented SAE. All the SAEs will be coded through MedDRA.

Table 4 Definition of SAEs
Full size table

Data management

Data are collected on patient demography, medical history, concomitant therapy, duration of CRRT, and dose and duration of esmolol. Vital and health status are assessed at the time of weaning from ECMO, discharged from ICU and hospital, unplanned hospital readmission, EQ-5D scores, and SAEs, during follow-up via telephone, face-to-face, or remote medical consultation over 365 days. To improve monitoring adherence, the clinician will take time to explain about the need for follow-up surveillance and encourage the participants to undergo routine examinations. Data are entered into a secure password-protected electronic data capture system and checked for quality by research staff. All queries are listed for content and raised and resolved dates. All study records required by the coordinating center at the Heart Health Research Center (HHRC) and applicable regulatory bodies are maintained for 15 years. The confidentiality of all participant information must be protected at the clinical sites and the coordinating center. Paper records and computer files must be appropriately safeguarded from unauthorized access.

Sample size

Sample size calculation is performed using the software PASS 15.0.5 based on the following assumption: a 70% 30-day mortality in the control group and a 20% relative risk reduction for each intervention (early CRRT and beta-blocker). The estimate of the intervention’s effect size was based on clinical expertise and the clinical significance of an intervention, no loss of follow-up or crossover, and 5% type I error and 20% type II error. We assume no interaction between interventions, as the overlap of the time of interventions would be limited and no carry-on effect expected. A total of 496 patients (248 per group) are required for each arm.

To achieve adequate participant enrolment to reach the target sample size, the study will be conducted at 10 high-volume centers in China. A smartphone application has been developed to facilitate randomization at the emergency room.

Statistical analysis

All analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle by blinded statisticians. All patients will be analyzed in accordance with the results of randomization, regardless of whether they received the prescribed therapy. Baseline characteristics between the groups will be reported as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as means and standard deviations (SD) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables. The primary outcome will be compared between the groups in a log-rank test. Other efficacy and safety endpoints will be reported with the t test or Wilcoxon test, and the chi-square test for continuous and categorial variables, respectively, as appropriate. All tests are two-sided, and the nominal level of α will be 5%.

In the subgroup analysis, age and ECPR will be defined by the presence or absence of a pre-randomization variable and the primary outcome as in the main analysis. The main analysis for each subgroup will be an unadjusted test of interaction in a logistic model to determine whether the effect of treatment differs significantly across categories. The missing values will not be imputed unless substantial. The number of observations used in the analysis will be reported.

Monitoring

The data monitoring committee (DMC) consists of a critical care physician, nephrologist, and cardiovascular expert, all experienced in clinical research. The principal investigator will report the process of the trial, quality of data collected, adverse events, and protocol deviation and violation to the DMC. The DMC will meet every 6 months during the conduction of the trial. No interim analysis for efficiency is planned as the assumptions in sample size calculation are less likely to be changed.

An investigator meeting is held annually to communicate the progress, quality control, and approaches to improve recruitment and address any quality of data issues.

Trial status

There have been 89 patients enrolled at 10 hospitals in study A, and the enrollment is still ongoing. However, study B was stopped in August 2019 in the absence of any patients being enrolled. Although we aimed to test the hypothesis that beta-blockers would protect the myocardium in ECMO patients, we found this too challenging to undertake as these patients have low BP, which is a contraindication to such treatment and raised concerns of harm among investigators. Moreover, the short time window for enrollment was another barrier to recruitment, and by the time a patient is stable and without vasopressors, it is near the time to wean them off ECMO. Consequently, we decided to close recruitment into arm B. During the COVID pandemic, patient enrollment has become more challenging. A review of the feasibility of the trial will be made by the Steering Committee at the end of 2022.

Discussion

Being one of the most seriously ill groups in clinical practice, with high mortality and requiring heavy use of critical care resources, there are considerable challenges to generate reliable evidence to guide the management of ECMO patients. Our ELITE trial attempts to address two important clinical questions with strong pathophysiological mechanisms.

A multicenter retrospective cohort study has shown that FO is common in a pediatric population (peak FO ≥ 10% in 84.8%, ≥ 20% in 67.2%, and ≥ 50% in 29%) [20] where FO has consistently been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes [21,22,23], while a meta-analysis of observational studies has shown lower mortality in those who receive CRRT [24]. These data suggest that early initiation of CRRT to avoid FO in the context of ECMO may be beneficial. The Kidney Interventions During Membrane Oxygenation (KIDMO) study showed that CRRT use was 43%, 16%, and 35% of patients for FO, for FO prevention, and for AKI, respectively, after ECMO [25]. However, there has not been a randomized trial to support these approaches. So, we designed this ELITE trial. As the closing of arm B, the question of whether beta-blocker is efficient in patients with ECMO remains unaddressed, and more effects should be made.

Other limitations of our trial include the lack of blinding, and for practical reasons, recruitment has been slow due to the small number of patients receiving ECMO despite the expectation of a least 10 cases treated annually across our network of 30 ICUs in China. We did not stratify our randomization by ECMO centers but will perform a subgroup analysis to explore the effect between small and large centers.

In summary, the ELITE trial is the first randomized controlled trial of critically ill patients receiving ECMO support, powered to test the effects of early CRRT versus conventional timing of CRRT on 30-day mortality. The results should inform the management of this important patient group.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. Aso S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. In-hospital mortality and successful weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: analysis of 5,263 patients using a national inpatient database in Japan. Crit Care. 2016;20:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen YC, Tsai FC, Fang JT, Yang CW. Acute kidney injury in adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(11):778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Selewski DT, Wille KM. Continuous renal replacement therapy in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Semin Dial. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12965.

  4. Schmidt M, Bailey M, Kelly J, Hodgson C, Cooper DJ, Scheinkestel C, et al. Impact of fluid balance on outcome of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):1256–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein SL, Somers MJ, Baum MA, Symons JM, Brophy PD, Blowey D, et al. Pediatric patients with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int. 2005;67(2):653–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanmassenhove J, Kielstein J, Jorres A, Biesen WV. Management of patients at risk of acute kidney injury. Lancet. 2017;389(10084):2139–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Pavenstadt H, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(20):2190–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Pons B, Boulet E, et al. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):122–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM. Septic shock. Lancet. 2005;365(9453):63–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso de Vega JM, Diaz J, Serrano E, Carbonell LF. Oxidative stress in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(8):1782–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudiger A. Beta-block the septic heart. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(10 Suppl):S608–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Werdan K, Muller U, Reithmann C, Pfeifer A, Hallstrom S, Koidl B, et al. Mechanisms in acute septic cardiomyopathy: evidence from isolated myocytes. Basic Res Cardiol. 1991;86(5):411–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreis DT, Singer M. Catecholamines for inflammatory shock: a Jekyll-and-Hyde conundrum. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1387–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmittinger CA, Torgersen C, Luckner G, Schroder DC, Lorenz I, Dunser MW. Adverse cardiac events during catecholamine vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(6):950–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohm M, Link A, Cai D, Nieminen MS, Filippatos GS, Salem R, et al. Beneficial association of beta-blocker therapy on recovery from severe acute heart failure treatment: data from the survival of patients with acute heart failure in need of intravenous inotropic support trial. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):940–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prins KW, Neill JM, Tyler JO, Eckman PM, Duval S. Effects of beta-blocker withdrawal in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2015;3(8):647–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, Ligges S, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selewski DT, Askenazi DJ, Bridges BC, Cooper DS, Fleming GM, Paden ML, et al. The impact of fluid overload on outcomes in children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(12):1126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fong KM, Au SY, Ng GWY, Leung AKH. Positive fluid balance and mortality in adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020;21(3):210–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Besnier E, Boubèche S, Clavier T, Popoff B, Dureuil B, Doguet F, et al. Early positive fluid balance is associated with mortality in patients treated with veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Shock. 2020;53(4):426–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCanny P, Smith MW, O’Brien SG, Buscher H, Carton EG. Fluid balance and recov- ery of native lung function in adult patients supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy. ASAIO J. 2019;65(6):614–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Han S-S, Kim HJ, Lee SJ, Kim WJ, Hong Y, Lee HY, et al. Effects of renal replacement therapy in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(4):1485–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleming GM, Askenazi DJ, Bridges BC, et al. A multicenter international survey of renal supportive therapy during ECMO: the kidney intervention during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (KIDMO) group. ASAIO J. 2012;58(4):407–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan X, Jia S, Meng X, Dong P, Jia M, Wan J, et al. Acute kidney injury in adult postcardiotomy patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: evaluation of the RIFLE classification and the acute kidney injury network criteria. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37(2):334–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participant centers in the ELITE trial.

Ancillary and post-trial care

The trial insurance to cover for non-negligent harm associated with the protocol. This will include cover for additional health care, compensation, or damages.

Dissemination

The results of the study will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and medical conferences. There is no intention to use the services of professional writers. Authorship will be determined in accordance with the ICMJE guidelines, and other contributors will be acknowledged.

Funding

The funding for the trial was provided by the National Thirteenth Five-year Key Technology Research and Development Program, sponsored by the Ministry of Science & Technology, China (2016YFC1301000, to J Dong), and the Capital Characteristic Clinic Project, sponsored by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, China (No. Z161100000516017 to X Hou). The sponsor and funder are responsible for the development and dissemination of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Xiaofang Wang, Jinying Zhang & Jianzeng Dong

  2. Center for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 2# Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China

    Hong Wang, Chenglong Li & Xiaotong Hou

  3. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 2# Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China

    Xin Du, Zhiyan Wang & Jianzeng Dong

  4. Heart Health Research Center, Beijing, China

    Xin Du

  5. George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Xin Du & Craig S. Anderson

Authors
  1. Xiaofang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chenglong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Craig S. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaotong Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianzeng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Author contributions are consistent with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations. XW, HW, CL, and JZ participated in the intervention of the study. CA and XD participated in the study design. XW, XD, and ZW drafted and revised this manuscript. XH and JD are the principal investigators and conceived the study. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Organization:

Coordinating center: Heart Health Research Center (HHRC)

Steering committee: Jianzeng Dong, Xiaotong Hou, Craig Anderson, Xin Du, Hong Wang, and Simon Finfer

Endpoint adjudication committee: We would not adjudicate the primary or secondary endpoints.

International advisor committee: Anushka Patel, Kazem Rahimi, Daniel Brodie, Roberto Lorusso, and Alain Combes

Data monitoring committee (DMC): Bruce Neal, Jicheng Lv, and Xiang Guo

Data management: Heart Health Research Center (HHRC)

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaotong Hou or Jianzeng Dong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial complied with the Declaration of Helsinki regarding the investigation of humans. Its ethical clearance, protocol (version 3.0 on September 25, 2019), and associated documents were approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen hospital (Approval ID: 2018013). Any significant modifications to the protocol will need approval from the ethics committee before implementation.

Informed consent and written consent forms of patients are mandatory before study participation. After the participant has been assessed as eligible, they or their guardians will be invited by the treating physicians to discuss the details and sign the informed consent. Additional consent provisions for use of participant data in ancillary studies are required. This trial does not involve collecting biological specimens for storage. Participants’ data is stored using a participant identification number, and the key to the identification code list is only available to the research team.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants to publish this manuscript and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Please insert Table 5 here

Table 5 ELITE study centers
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Wang, H., Du, X. et al. EvaLuation of early CRRT and beta-blocker InTervention in patients with ECMO (ELITE) trial: study protocol for a 2 × 2 partial factorial randomized controlled trial. Trials 23, 684 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06617-x

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215