Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of programmed flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation on upper limb motor functional reconstruction after stroke: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 24, Article number: 324 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stroke’s prevalence and morbidity are increasing (Guano, et al. Neuro 89:53–61, 2017), and limb motor dysfunction is left in most patients (Gittler, et al. JAMA 319:820–821, 2018). Particularly, the rehabilitation of upper limbs is more difficult and time-consuming (Borges, et al. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 10:CD011887, 2018).

Methods

A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to investigate whether a new functional electrical stimulation (FES) combined with acupoint therapy is more effective in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two groups: programmed flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation group (PES group) and conventional flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation group (CES group), which will be treated for 3 weeks. The primary outcome measures are electroencephalogram (EEG) and surface electromyogram (sEMG). The secondary outcome variables include MBI (modified Barthel index), China Stroke Scale (CSS), FMA-U (Fugl-Meyer assessment upper limb), MMT (manual muscle testing), and Brunnstrom.

Discussion

The results of this study are expected to verify the efficacy of PES therapy in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function after stroke. This may promote the widespread use of the therapy in hospitals, communities, and homes for early and continuous treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05333497. Registered on April 11, 2022.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Global Burden of Disease (GBD) has indicated that stroke is the leading cause of death and disability among adults in China [1]. More than 80% of patients have suffered from acute motor dysfunction, and over 50% have long-term limitations [2]. Among them, about 69 to 80% of stroke patients have upper limb motor dysfunction [3]. During the recovery, the affected upper limb shows a flexion pattern and limited movement, which seriously influences the patient’s daily life. It is a key and difficult point of stroke sequela always, and a lot of exploration of different rehabilitation therapies and intervention effects has been conducted by domestic and foreign scholars. With the increasing recognition of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially acupuncture, the therapies for stroke sequelae by integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine have been widely used. In recent years, functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been a concern in the rehabilitation field. Therefore, the combination of FES and TCM acupoint therapy on upper limb functional reconstruction after stroke is worth further study.

FES is commonly used in patients with motor disorders such as stroke, spinal cord injury, and hemiplegia. The possible mechanism is mainly brain remodeling and activity-dependent plasticity [4]. By electrical stimulation, one or more groups of muscles are induced to generate muscle movement or mimic normal voluntary movement in order to improve the function of the stimulated muscles or muscle groups. Studies have shown that FES can help patients with neural dyskinesia rebuild some motor function [5] to achieve the purpose of rehabilitation, and can also help relieve muscle pain and spasm for the improvement of muscle status [6]. It has been widely used in the rehabilitation of hemiplegia patients and has very definite effects on the recovery of sensory and motor function of limbs.

Acupuncture is a vital part of TCM, as well as an internationally recognized physical therapy, with high safety, significant efficacy and no serious adverse events in limb motor rehabilitation after stroke [7]. Currently, the mechanism of an acupoint is not completely clear, but the viewpoint of central nervous control is an essence of the curative effect [8,9,10,11]. In this study, the flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation instrument has combined traditional acupuncture with modern low-frequency technology, with the advantage of non-invasion and convenience, to improve joint activity, relieve spasm, enhance muscle strength, and promote the central nervous system and limb function reconstruction [12]. However, simultaneous movement of several single joints is produced by local stimulation with the conventional instrument, but no coordinated movement of multiple joints is generated. In order to improve patients’ ability of daily living (ADL), the program is improved in this study based on the original instrument to a programmed one. Through the output of electrical stimulation at different times, muscles or muscle groups in different parts are stimulated to form programmed movement. By neuro-electrophysiological test and scale evaluation, this study will conduct a double-blind RCT to objectively evaluate the effect of flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation on upper limb motor functional reconstruction.

Methods

Pre-design

Five healthy subjects and five patients are selected to conduct a survey on the comfort of this instrument parameters, body position, stimulation time, muscle fatigue, completion of programmed movements, and other conditions and to refine the trial design in response to feedback and comments from participants.

Study design

This clinical trial is designed as a double-blind RCT with 90 participants (60 stroke patients and 30 healthy controls) to be recruited. SPIRIT checklist and CONSORT statement were used when writing this study protocol [13, 14]. The whole study duration is about 17 weeks, including the washout period (7 days), the screening observation (3–7 days), the treatment period (3 weeks), and the follow-up period (3 months) (Fig. 1). After signing the informed consent (version date: 2021.11.19, version number: V1.1), all patients will be randomized divided into two groups in a blind manner—programmed flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation group (PES group) and conventional flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation group (CES group) with 30 cases in each, and the treatment will last for 3 weeks (6 days of treatment with 1-day rest per week). Healthy controls are used as a baseline without treatment. Participation in the trial is entirely voluntary, and they can withdraw at any time during the study without any reason. The participants are blinded, and the signal acquisition, evaluation, and outcome assessors are blinded. Because the treatment operation is too programmed, it is difficult to blind the performers. To prevent unblinding, subjects are advised not to discuss treatment options with evaluators (Figs. 2 and 3). All the patients will be followed up for 3 months. The follow-up time points will be at the end of the 1st month and 3rd month after the trial. The data and results will be monitored by the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) and the Ethics Committee.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the whole trial (details of patients’ and healthy controls’ groups in Figs. 2 and 3)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram of the PES group and CES group. MBI, Modified Barthel Index; CSS, China Stroke Scale; U-FMA, upper Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment; MMT, Manual Muscle Testing; Brunnstrom, Brunnstrom motor function assessment

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Flow diagram of the healthy control group

Full size image

Study setting

The patients are stroke inpatients meeting the inclusion criteria in Acupuncture and Moxibustion Ward 3 of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine in Harbin, China. This hospital is the highest level one in China.

Patients and healthy controls

All the 60 eligible patients will be recruited through clinic centers, hospital announcements, and China’s pubic social network platform (WeChat application), and the enrollment time is expected to be 3–5 months. After being informed of the possible problems during the participation in this trial, they should sign the informed consent and will be assessed by sEMG [15], resting state EEG with closed eyes [16], and scales. And the patients will be randomly assigned to either group. All patients will receive conventional medication, rehabilitation, and acupuncture. As informed, during the study period, any other Chinese and Western medicine or treatment care related to this disease will not be permitted without the approval from the trial staff in advance.

The healthy controls only need the detection of sEMG and EEG. Neither patients nor healthy controls will be involved in the design, conduct, or data processing of this study. The inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria of patients and healthy controls are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria
Full size table

Interventions

All patients received conventional medication, rehabilitation, and acupuncture. As informed, during the study period, any other Chinese and Western medicine or treatment care related to this disease will not be permitted without the approval from the trial staff in advance.

PES group

Based on the routine treatment in the department of acupuncture [17], the fourth generation of SZR-LF-2A low-frequency acupoint electric stimulation therapy instrument (patent No. ZL201610793646.9) jointly developed by our research group and the Robotics Institute of Harbin Institute of Technology will be used to improve the program (Fig. 4). The output of the improved instrument program is the patient should complete the motion of “reaching and retrieving,” namely, shoulder joint forward flexion—elbow extension—wrist dorsal extension—finger extension (“reaching for objects”), then grasping—wrist flexion—elbow flexion—shoulder joint backward extension (“retrieve objects”). All patients are in a sitting position, the wrist of the affected limb is suspended, and the other parts do not touch any plane. The electrode connection is divided into six groups, with two patches in each group, and acupoints on the affected side are selected. Power on after the connection and the current is within the patient’s tolerance, no pain. Acupoint selection is as follows (Table 2, Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The fourth generation of the SZR-LF-2A low-frequency acupoint electric stimulation therapy instrument (patent no. ZL201610793646.9)

Full size image
Table 2 Acupoint selection
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Position of the flexor electrodes and extensor electrodes (photos are provided by one author of this article)

Full size image

CES group

Based on the conventional treatment in the Department of Acupuncture, the output mode of the fourth generation of low-frequency acupoint electric stimulation instrument of the original program will be adopted to synchronously stimulate the flexor and extensor acupoints respectively. The selection of acupoints, treatment time, and course will be the same as those of the PES group.

Healthy control group

No treatment, as the baseline. Ask them to do the “reaching and retrieving” gross motion and record the resting state EEG and motion state sEMG parameters.

All the patients will receive free medical care during the study period, including counseling, therapy, electrophysiology, and scale evaluation. Participation in the trial is entirely voluntary, and patients can withdraw at any time during the study without any reason. The patient’s medical records will be kept in the hospital and only available to researchers, research authorities and ethics committee members of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine for review. Any public reporting of the results will not disclose the patients’ and healthy controls’ privacy. If the participant withdraws, their data will also be recorded but will not be used in this study.

Furthermore, for improving the adherence, the relevant staff will adequately explain the treatment method, duration, potential risks, and other details to the participants and keep connected whenever they need any medical service.

Randomization and blinding

A random grouping method will be adopted. The SPSS 26.0 statistical software is used to randomly generate serial numbers and groups, and blind selection cards are made and put into envelopes (with no difference in appearance). Numbers are according to the inclusion sequence of the subjects, and corresponding experimental groups are entered according to the blind selection cards. Envelope administrators will not participate in this study, and the staff who generate the allocation sequence, enroll participants, and assign participants to interventions will be different ones without communication about the allocation. When patients are treated, the operators should follow the treatment assignment.

The study will be conducted in a double-blind method. Due to the particularity of the operation, the operators (participating doctors and physiotherapists) will not be blinded, but only the electrophysiological indicator collectors, scale evaluators, data recorders, statistical analysts, outcome assessors, and the included subjects are blinded. The operators are not involved in the design of the protocol; thus, they have no determination of the potential differences of each treatment method. They only need to ensure the protocols are followed accurately, so that the treatment and results will not be influenced even though they are unblinded.

Measurement

Patient demographics: age, gender, BMI, course of disease, functional damage and serious underlying diseases, and date of admission.

Healthy control demographics: age, gender, BMI, once eyes-closed resting state EEG signals, and real-time sEMG signals.

Treatment information: enrollment time, treatment time, hospital discharge time, withdrawal time, problems in the treatment period, scale evaluation (MBI, CSS, FMA-U, MMT, and Brunnstrom), eyes-closed resting state EEG signals, and real-time sEMG signals [19].

Follow-up: dates of follow-up visit, adjuvant therapies, overall health status at and during follow-up (recovery condition of the upper limb, activity of daily living, fundamental diseases, drugs, death, loss of follow-up), and scale evaluation (MBI, CSS, FMA-U, MMT, and Brunnstrom). The follow-up staff will also be blinded.

The trial time enrollment schedule is estimated to be 6–8 months with a 3-month follow-up after the end of treatment. In 48 h after signing the informed consent, the patients will be randomly divided into groups according to the order in the clinic and then receive treatment after being evaluated (Table 3).

Table 3 Schedule of study procedures
Full size table

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures

The primary outcomes are real-time sEMG signals [20] and eyes-closed resting state EEG signals [21].

Patients

Before and after the first and last treatment, the immediate alpha, beta, delta, and theta bands of the eyes-closed resting state EEG of patients in the two groups and ask the patients to do the “reaching and retrieving” gross motion, recording the real-time sEMG data of RMS (root mean square) and MF (median frequency). Data of the following are collected: biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), brachioradialis (B), extensor digitorum (ED), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) during the whole process of the motion. Computer software calculates iEMG (integrated electromyogram) and MPF (mean power frequency) values.

Healthy controls

Before the beginning of the whole clinical trial, the immediate alpha, beta, delta, and theta bands of the eyes-closed resting state EEG of the healthy controls in a quiet, without any interference laboratory will be recorded and ask them to do the “reaching and retrieving” gross movement, recording the real-time sEMG parameters (RMS and MF) of BB, TB, ECR, B, ED, and FCU during the whole process of the motion. The computer software calculates iEMG and MPF values.

Secondary outcome measures

Before and after the whole trial, the secondary outcome variables including MBI (a daily functional activity assessment) [22], CSS (a neurological deficits assessment) [23], FMA-U (a motor function assessment for upper limb) [24], MMT (a muscle strength assessment), and Brunnstrom (a limb function recovery assessment) [25] are evaluated.

Sample size estimation

Sample size estimation was carried out according to the study objectives and protocol, and the difference between RMS values of sEMG of BB was obtained from the pretest of group 1 and group 2 after treatment and the healthy group. The difference between the healthy group and group 1 was 167.61 and 68.17 for group 2, and the standard deviations were respectively 127.22 and 148.46. The study effect size is 0.8, α = 0.05, test efficiency 1 − β = 0.80, and the number of sample groups is two. The sample size of each group is 25, and the total sample size is 50. Considering the possibility of sample loss in the trial, the sample size should be increased by 20%. Finally, the total sample size of this study should be 60 and divided into two groups with 30 sample size for each group.

Management and safety monitoring

Before the initiation of this trial, the feasibility and innovation of this protocol have been discussed comprehensively in the seminar composed of five authoritative experts in the field. Then, the task will be divided, and the relevant personnel should receive training. To prevent treatment bias, all the staff including doctors, physiotherapists, group allocation workers, data collectors, data registers, and data processing analysts need to be trained in advance on the tasks they are responsible for. Participants are all anonymous in this trial, and their demographic information will be stored in a Word file with a password kept by the manager, and their trial data will be recorded in another Word file by relevant staff without any participants’ information. If there is any special circumstance, all trial personnel should be informed in advance, and approval should be obtained before checking the participants’ relevant records. The project manager, researchers, and experts from the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine are mainly responsible for the quality control of these trials.

In order to achieve the ability of standard operation procedure (SOP), filling in of case report form (CRF), Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system, and data entry. All data will be accurately double-entered into the EDC system, and the electronic CRF will be identical to the paper CRF. Moreover, multiple imputation will be used to deal with the missing data as part of the sensitivity analysis.

Trial conduct auditing

In order to timely discover and solve the problems encountered in the study duration, the Project Management Group will check the trial records and hold a group meeting to review trial conduct twice a week. Meanwhile, the Trial Steering Group (including acupuncture and rehabilitation physicians, instrument engineer, and data analysts) and Ethics Committee meet each week to monitor the progress throughout the whole trial period, which will be independent from the investigators and the sponsor.

Data statistical analysis

The SPSS 26.0 statistical software will be used for analysis by three-party statisticians. Data presentation: each measurement is presented as mean ± standard deviation if it conforms to a normal distribution, or median and quartiles if it does not. Intra-group comparisons: if the measurement data in each group conforms to a normal distribution, paired T test will be used for comparison between each group before and after treatment; if all data does not conform to a normal distribution, paired sample Wilcoxon rank sum test is used. Inter-group comparison: If the measurement data of conforms to a normal distribution, one-way ANOVA will be performed, and the LSD method will be used for comparison between the groups (Welch’s test will be used to correct Dunnett’s T3 method when the variance is not equal); if the data does not all conform to a normal distribution, non-parametric test will be performed (Mann–Whitney U method is applied for comparison between two groups, and Kruskal–Wallis H method is for comparison between multiple groups).

Responsibilities of each trial groups

Under the guidance of the study director, the trial design group extensively reviews references and information about the subject, designs and adjusts the trial protocol, and collates the clinical data. Detailed information from ward feedback is collected daily, summarized and recorded, and reported to the director twice a week if there are no exceptional circumstances, but cannot be involved in treatment, data collection, or assessment.

The expert group provides comprehensive guidance on trial design, implementation, and analysis of the results, and the design group reports weekly to it on the progress if no special circumstances occur.

The Ethics Committee and DSMC are responsible for the approval of the trial design and the occasional monitoring of the trial.

Acupuncture and Moxibustion Ward 3 is the main site for the implementation of the trial, from which the patients are sourced and treated, with the medical and nursing staff and the rehabilitation therapists providing accurate operation. They undertake patient treatment, observation, assessment, EEG-sEMG data collection, recording, and dealing with emergencies, which will be summarized by the ward manager and feed back to the design team on a daily basis. If difficulties are encountered, advice is sought from the trial director or even submitted to the expert group for joint discussion.

The third party data processing team processes and analyses the data according to the objective data provided by the design group and is not allowed to ask about anything related to the trial due to blind consideration.

Discussion

In the process of motor function recovery in stroke patients, flexor and extensor coordination disorder is a common symptom [26, 27]. At present, the theoretical basis of limb function rehabilitation of apoplexy mainly includes brain plasticity theory and limb movement control theory [28]. Patients show the spasticity pattern of the upper limb flexor and lower limb extensor [29]. Therefore, stimulation of the flexor or extensor muscle alone is not enough. Abnormal movement patterns can affect the recovery of motor function and cause wrong posture, which needs to be corrected timely.

Rehabilitation of the upper limbs is difficult and time-consuming. This instrument is combined with the advantages of FES and acupoints. By stimulating the corresponding acupoints of the active and passive muscle groups of the upper extremity at low frequency, the contractile ability of the muscles is enhanced, and the relaxation and contraction function of the active and antagonistic muscle groups is coordinated, to effectively improve the motor function of the affected limb and promote the recovery of the central nervous system.

Six months is a gold period for rehabilitation after stroke [30]. But due to the COVID-19 epidemic, treatment has affected many patients. Rehabilitation training should be initiated soon after the stroke condition stabilized for better recovery effect [31]. The instrument is portable, easy to use, non-invasive and painless, and low cost, which may be easy to be accepted at home or in the community.

This study is a double-blind RCT. The safety and efficacy of the instrument are beyond doubt after 20 years of clinical application and many clinical studies [32,33,34]. This study improved the previous electrical stimulation output strategy, formed into a programmed one. Through the evaluation of neuro-electrophysiology and scales, the curative effects will be visualized and objectified for better interpreting the difference in the two stimulation methods, which may provide a new reference for integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of motor function recovery after stroke.

Trial status

The recruitment began on 3 June 2022 and is expected to last for 2 months (version date: 2021.11.19, version number: V1.1).

Availability of data and materials

Trial data are available on reasonable non-commercial request to the investigator of the study.

Abbreviations

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

FES:

Functional electrical stimulation

TCM:

Traditional Chinese medicine

PES:

Programmed flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation

CES:

Conventional flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation

EEG:

Electroencephalography

sEMG:

Surface Electromyography

MBI:

Modified Barthel Index

CSS:

China Stroke Scale

FMA-U:

Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb

MMT:

Manual Muscle Testing

GBD:

Global Burden of Disease

ADL:

Activities of Daily Living

SPIRIT:

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

DMSMC:

Data and Safety Monitoring Committee

RMS:

Root mean square

MF:

Median frequency

BB:

Biceps brachii

TB:

Triceps brachii

ECR:

Extensor carpi radialis

B:

Brachioradialis

ED:

Extensor digitorum

FCU:

Flexor carpi ulnaris

iEMG:

Integrated Electromyography

MPF:

Mean power frequency

SOP:

Standard operation procedure

CRF:

Case Report Form

EDC:

Electronic Data Capture

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

References

  1. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurology. 2019;18(5):459–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Micera S, Caleo M, Chisari C, et al. Advanced neurotechnologies for the restoration of motor function. Neuron. 2020;105(4):604–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Plantin J, Laourencikas E, Lindberg P, et al. Biomarkers for prediction of hand function after stroke/INS; the ProHand study protocol. J Neurol Sci. 2013;333(S1):555–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. XY Zheng, DF Chen, TB Yan. A randomized clinical trial of a functional electrical stimulation mimic to gait promotes motor recovery and brain remodeling in acute stroke. Behav Neurol. 2018; 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8923520.

  5. Qu HG, Xie YJ, Liu XX, et al. Development of network-based multichannel neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(2):263–78. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradnam LV, Meiring RM, Boyce M, McCambridge A. Neurorehabilitation in dystonia: a holistic perspective. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021;128(4):549–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-020-02265-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang A, Wu HM, Tang JL, et al. Acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD004131–CD004131. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004131.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang JF, Luo T, Luo WS. Research progress on mechanisms of acupuncture in treating ischemic stroke. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2022;47(1):78–82. https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.201026. (Chinese).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hui KK, Liu J, Makris N, et al. Acupuncture modulates the limbic system and subcortical gray structures of the human brain: evidence from fMRI studies in normal subjects. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;9(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(2000)9:1%3c13::aid-hbm2%3e3.0.co;2-f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundeberg T, Lund I, Näslund J. Acupuncture - self-appraisal and the reward system. Acupunct Med. 2007;25(3):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.25.3.87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang J, Jin Z, Wang Y, et al. The salient characteristics of the central effects of acupuncture needling: limbicparalimbic-neocortical network modulation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(4):1196–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao ML, Wang DY, Song J. Clinical observation on the treatment of grasping dysfunction after stroke with alternation of flexion and extensor muscle at low-frequency acupoint electric stimulation. Chin Acupuncture Moxibustion. 2019; 751–754. https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2019.004023.

  13. An-Wen C, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586 (PMID: 23303884).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;63:e1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong MJ, Zhou Y, Li JF, et al. State of the art in parallel ankle rehabilitation robot: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00845-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gramkow MH, Hasselbalch SG, Waldemar G, et al. Resting state EEG in exercise intervention studies: a systematic review of effects and methods. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng JS, Liu M, Cui LY, et al. Diagnostic criteria of cerebrovascular diseases in China (version 2019). Chin J Neurol. 2019;52(9):710–5. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh N, Saini M, Kumar N, et al. Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00867-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jepsen JR, Laursen LH, Carl-Goran Hagert, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination I. Inter-rater reproducibility of findings and patterns. BMC Neurol. 2006;6:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-6-8.

  20. Pokharel RK, Brisco L, Mandal M, et al. Effect of sitting posture on development of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy cases. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2014;12(27):94–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang T, Zhao J, Li X, et al. Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of clinical management of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5(3):250–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2019-000321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–9 (PMID: 2760661).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Madhoun HY, Tan B, Feng Y, et al. Task-based mirror therapy enhances the upper limb motor function in subacute stroke patients: a randomized control trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(3):265–71. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06070-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1980;7:85–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen JL, Zhang CL, Jiang H, et al. Atorvastatin induction of VEGF and BDNF promotes brain plasticity after stroke in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25(2):281–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Dis Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400014576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ward AB. A literature review of the pathophysiology and onset of post-stroke spasticityt. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):21–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03448.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Vries CF, Staff RT, Waiter GD, et al. Motion during acquisition is associated with fMRI brain entropy. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(2):586–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2907189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Doussoulin A, Rivas C, Bacco J, et al. Prevalence of spasticity and postural patterns in the upper extremity post stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(11):105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Szelenberger R, Kostka J, Saluk-Bijak J, et al. Pharmacological interventions and rehabilitation approach for enhancing brain self-repair and stroke recovery. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X17666190726104139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016643553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang HY, Wang DY. Clinical study of electro-acupuncture combined with flexor and extensor alternative stimulation on improving dysfunction of lower limbs in stroke patients. J Clin Acupunct Moxibustion. 2021;37(1):30–4. https://doi.org/10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.021009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. DY Wang, X Dong, B Wang. Study on the dose effect relationship of electroacupuncture on wrist function reconstruction after stroke by sEMS. The World Acupuncture and Moxibustion Academic Conference 2017 and the Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Society Annual Conference 2017 Proceedings 2017; 301–302.

  34. DY Wang, HY Yang, X Dong, et al. Effects of the combination of electroacupuncture and flexor and extensor alternative low-frequency electrical stimulation on walking ability of apoplectic semiplegia patients. The world Acupuncture and Moxibustion Academic Conference 2017 and the Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Society Annual Conference 2017 Proceedings 2017; 250–251.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Dongyan Wang (PhD, doctoral supervisor, chief physician, professor, vice president of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine and the inventor of the instrument in this trial) for the important guidance and monitoring in this trial. We also give many thanks to the review of the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine and the help of the staff from Acupuncture and Moxibustion Ward 3 of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine. Special thanks to all the participants in this study.

Funding

Supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2019H113) and the “Outstanding Innovative Talents Support Program” Scientific Research Project of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (person in charge: Dongyan Wang).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, No. 24 Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, People’s Republic of China

    Yang Liu, Dan Tong, Jiahui Liu, Hongyan Zhang, Yingkang Zheng, Shuai Wang & Dongyan Wang

  2. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Nangang District, No. 105 AshiheRoad, Harbin, People’s Republic of China

    Xu Dong, Hong Huo, Liyuan Feng & Dongyan Wang

Authors
  1. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liyuan Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dan Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiahui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongyan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yingkang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dongyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL is the first author, translator, and responsible for this trial overall. DW is the director, commander-in-chief, and sponsor of this trial. XD, LF, and DT give advice on the design and supervision of the operation. HH undertakes the revision and final review of this paper. JL and HZ provide skill support. YZ and SW perform the operations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongyan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol has been approved, and the informed consent has been reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (approval number: IRB-AF/SG-18/01.0), with further monitoring routinely including the results. All participants will sign the informed consent (version date: 2021.11.19, version number: V1.1) for publication prior to enrollment, which will be kept by the designated investigator. The recruitment will start in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, and the feedback and withdrawal rights of participants will be permanent during the trial. All the results (papers and reports) of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals or conference collections. Any changes that affect the protocol implementation or are beneficial or harmful to patients, including sample size and intervention plan, should be carefully discussed and submitted to the ethics committee for review. In addition, due to the high safety of this trial, no adverse reactions have occurred since the clinical use of this instrument, so this study does not involve post-test care and compensation.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved the publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Dong, X., Huo, H. et al. Effects of programmed flexor–extensor alternating electrical acupoint stimulation on upper limb motor functional reconstruction after stroke: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Trials 24, 324 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07283-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07283-3

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215