Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Prevention of diabetes in overweight/obese children through a family based intervention program including supervised exercise (PREDIKID project): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 9,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 11,
  • 8 and
  • 12Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Trials201718:372

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2117-y

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 22 April 2017
  • Accepted: 26 July 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The global pandemic of obesity has led to an increased risk for prediabetes and type-2 diabetes (T2D). The aims of the current project are: (1) to evaluate the effect of a 22-week family based intervention program, including supervised exercise, on insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) risk in children with a high risk of developing T2D and (2) to identify the profile of microRNA in circulating exosomes and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in children with a high risk of developing T2D and its response to a multidisciplinary intervention program including exercise.

Methods

A total of 84 children, aged 8–12 years, with a high risk of T2D will be included and randomly assigned to control (N = 42) or intervention (N = 42) groups. The control group will receive a family based lifestyle education and psycho-educational program (2 days/month), while the intervention group will attend the same lifestyle education and psycho-educational program plus the exercise program (3 days/week, 90 min per session including warm-up, moderate to vigorous aerobic activities, and strength exercises). The following measurements will be evaluated at baseline prior to randomization and after the intervention: fasting insulin, glucose and hemoglobin A1c; body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry); ectopic fat (magnetic resonance imaging); microRNA expression in circulating exosomes and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MiSeq; Illumina); cardiorespiratory fitness (cardiopulmonary exercise testing); dietary habits and physical activity (accelerometry).

Discussion

Prevention and identification of children with a high risk of developing T2D could help to improve their cardiovascular health and to reduce the comorbidities associated with obesity.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03027726. Registered on 16 January 2017.

Keywords

  • Type-2 diabetes
  • Children
  • Exercise
  • Family based lifestyle intervention program
  • miRNA
  • Ectopic fat

Background

Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is an important cause of premature death and disability as well as a costly disease affecting more than 415 million people worldwide [1]. This chronic disease is an important risk factor for developing accelerated cardiovascular disease and is the leading cause of microvascular complications such as end-stage renal disease, blindness and limb amputations. T2D was traditionally viewed as an adult-onset disease; however, over the last two decades scientific literature shows a global and dramatic increase in the incidence of T2D in youth [2], secondary to the coincident pandemic of childhood obesity [3]. The life-time risk of developing microvascular and macrovascular complications and mortality in early adulthood can be expected to be higher when the onset is already in children/adolescents rather than in adults with T2D or insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) due to the longer duration of the disease and greater duration of glycemic exposure [2, 4, 5].

As a consequence of the high rates of obesity and diabetes risk, health and scientific organizations demand urgent early preventive actions for increasing life expectancy and quality of life of overweight/obese children at a high risk of T2D [1, 6, 7]. T2D in youth is largely preventable through lifestyle intervention programs based on increasing physical activity levels, improving dietary habits and promoting a healthy body weight [8]. Likewise, overweight and obesity are the strongest risk factors for insulin resistance and T2D [9, 10]. However, long-term success rates of lifestyle intervention programs focused on T2D prevention or treatment in children are usually less than 10% [11]. The etiology of this apparent inefficiency of lifestyle intervention programs is multifactorial: lack of multidisciplinary approaches, high rates of depression or anxiety which affect the adherence to the program, insufficient involvement of the parents, etc. [12–14]. Therefore, there is a need for studies examining the effect of family based multidisciplinary intervention programs on metabolic abnormalities closely associated to T2D risk in order to give appropriate treatment/prevention options for prediabetes and T2D in overweight/obese children.

In adults, lifestyle intervention programs based on diet and physical activity level modifications have proven to be effective in decreasing the rate of the progression from glucose intolerance or prediabetes to T2D [6]. However, body mass loss achieved reducing energy intake is the cornerstone to the treatment in adults [6]. In children, energy restriction programs may compromise healthy growth and development, and increase the risk of disordered eating behaviors.

There is substantial evidence indicating that lifestyle behaviors associated to obesity and T2D are established in childhood and are difficult to modify into adulthood [15]. The adoption of healthy dietary habits is essential in the prevention of the onset of T2D in children at high risk of T2D. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages [16], energy-dense diets [17], reduced consumption of fiber, fruits and vegetables [18, 19], breakfast and meal skipping [20] or eating frequency [21] have been consistently associated with obesity and T2D risk. In addition, previous studies have shown the association of low physical activity levels and sedentary behaviors with insulin resistance in children [22]. Moreover, short sleep duration and poor sleep quality have been proposed as predictors of obesity and T2D onset in children and adults [23, 24].

Family based lifestyle modification interventions (i.e., targeting both the child and parent) seem to be the most efficacious treatment format for childhood obesity [25]. In addition, psychological and emotional factors are important determinants of lifestyle modifications [26] and depressive symptoms and psychological stress have negative effects on dietary behaviors and physical activity levels [27]. Moreover, overweight/obese children have an impaired psychological wellbeing compared to their non-overweight peers [28]. In this context, multicomponent lifestyle management aiming to promote healthy dietary and sleep habits, increase physical activity levels and reduce sedentary behaviors may contribute to the prevention of T2D in the short and the long term [29, 30].

Exercise is a critical component for T2D prevention and management. Likewise, regular physical activity improves insulin sensitivity in diabetic or prediabetic children [31]. Previous studies have shown that exercise training reduces insulin resistance in overweight/obese youth, even without body mass loss [32]. Interestingly, Davis et al. reported that the benefit of aerobic training on insulin resistance was dose-dependent in overweight children regardless of sex and race [33]. However, although exercise is recommended for overweight/obese children, optimal exercise prescription describing type (aerobic training, resistance training or combined training) and intensity (moderate or vigorous) of exercise needed to reduce T2D risk in children is unclear.

Obesity, insulin resistance and T2D are caused by a combination of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors such as diet and exercise. During the last few years, a growing number of studies demonstrate that small, non-coding, ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules that function as regulators of gene expression, microRNAs (miRNAs), may be involved in the pathogenesis of obesity, diabetes and related metabolic disorders [34, 35]. Several studies observed that miRNAs play a significant role in insulin production and secretion, pancreatic islet development and β-cell differentiation, and that they are implicated in several aspects of glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism associated with the pathogenesis and progress of T2D and obesity [36–38]. The stability and presence of miRNAs in a variety of readily accessible cell types including body fluids, as well as their often tissue- and disease-specific expression, and the possibility to measure them with high sensitivity and specificity, render them a potential source of clinical biomarkers of T2D risk [39]. Moreover, miRNAs reflect individual biological adaptations to physiological changes or environmental exposures such as diet or exercise. Likewise, measurement of miRNAs presents an opportunity to evaluate biological changes associated with lifestyle interventions for the reduction of metabolic disorders associated with T2D risk such as insulin resistance, ectopic fat accumulation, inflammation, etc. The majority of the studies aiming to identify miRNAs as biomarkers of obesity and T2D have been conducted in small samples of adults. Previous reports observed changes in circulating miRNA profile after metformin therapy [38] or exercise in prediabetic adults [40]. In obese children, several miRNAs have been proposed as biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and dyslipidemia [41]. As far as we are aware, there are no previous studies identifying the profile of miRNAs in children at a high risk of T2D and its response to a family based multidisciplinary intervention program including exercise.

Therefore, the primary aims of the PREDIKID (Prevention of Diabetes in Kids) study are: (1) to evaluate the effect of a 22-week, family based, multidisciplinary intervention program including exercise on IRS in children with a high risk of developing T2D and (2) to identify the profile of microRNA in circulating exosomes and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in children with a high risk of developing T2D and its response to a family based multidisciplinary intervention program including exercise.

Methods

Design

The PREvention of DIabetes in KIDs (PREDIKID) study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03027726) (see Additional file 1 and Fig. 1 for the associated Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Checklist and Figure, respectively). Children will be randomly allocated to the control group or the exercise group and will be followed for 22 weeks. All the families included in the study will participate in a lifestyle education and psycho-educational program conducted by a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals (physicians, nutritionists and dieticians, psychologists and exercise specialist) and scientists. As both groups will receive the same lifestyle education and psycho-education program, differences in changes in outcome variables will be due to the additional effect of the exercise intervention. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Investigation of Euskadi. All parents or legal guardians will sign an informed written consent and all the children will give their assent before being enrolled in the study. The informed consent will be obtained by the pediatricians participating in the recruitment.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials SPIRIT Figure. cIMT carotid intima media thickness; CRF cardiorespiratory fitness; HDL high-density lipoprotein; SAAT subcutaneous abdominal fat; TG triglycerides; VAT visceral abdominal fat

Participants and selection criteria

Participants will be recruited by pediatricians from the Pediatric Endocrinology Unit of the University Hospital of Txagorritxu and from primary care clinics (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain). Children aged between 8 and 12 years, meeting the international criteria for classification of T2D risk [1, 42], and having at least one parent or caregiver willing to participate in the program sessions, will be included (Table 1).
Table 1

Eligibility criteria for the PREvention of DIabetes in KIDs (PREDIKID) study

Inclusion criteria

 Aged 8–12 years

 Criteria for the classification of risk of T2D [1]a

1. Obesity status according to the World Obesity Federation [24] 2. Overweight and the presence of at least one of the following metabolic abnormalities: 2.1. Family history of T2D in first- or second-degree relative; Signs of insulin resistance or conditions associated with insulin resistance (acanthosis nigricans, HOMA > 2.5, glucose between 100 and 125 mg/dL; Hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg); Dyslipidemia (HDL < 40 mg/dL, TG > 150 mg/dL); 2.2. Ethnic minority with higher risk

 To have at least one parent or caregiver willing to participate in the program sessions

Exclusion criteria

 Not available for assessment and intervention sessions

 Medical conditions or medications that would affect study results or limit physical exercise

PREDIKID PREvention of DIabetes in Kids. aAccording to the International Diabetes Federation [1]. T2D type-2 diabetes; TG triglycerides; HDL high-density lipoprotein; HOMA homeostatic model assessment

A pre-screening appointment will be scheduled with the investigation team to assess eligibility, family needs and commitment. Parents will provide the child’s and family health history and detailed contact information. After completion of the informed consent process, children will undergo anthropometric screening (height, body mass and waist circumference), complete physical examination and blood sampling, and will be selected for inclusion in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Every child meeting the inclusion criteria will go through maximal exercise testing guarantee. Children with any medical condition that could affect the results of the study or that limits physical activity will be excluded.

Sample size calculation

Insulin resistance is the primary outcome of this study. We expect that pre-post intervention differences in our design consisting in two experimental groups, control and exercise group, will have a size effect (Cohen’s d) of 0.7 for insulin resistance (i.e., homeostatic model assessment, HOMA) (N = 34 in each group, 80% power and α of 0.05). These effect size estimates are based on previous studies performed in overweight children with similar age range and a with intervention programs including supervised exercise [33, 43, 44]. We observed in one previous study, in which the effect of the same intervention program was tested on hepatic fat in overweight/obese children, losses to follow-up of approximately 7% (data not shown). Previous studies have reported losses to follow-up of between 4 and 17%. Assuming a maximum loss of follow-up of 20%, we decided to recruit a total of 84 children (50% girls), 42 children for each group.

Randomization

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned after completing the baseline measurements to either the control group or the or exercise group (Fig. 2). Randomization of the participants into the control or exercise group will be done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21, Armonk, NY, USA) by an independent researcher. Assessment staff will be blinded to participant randomization assignment. Participants and their parents or guardians will be explicitly informed of the group to which they will be assigned, as well as of the study hypotheses. As exercise is potentially beneficial for the health of the children recruited in this trial, the waiting list control group strategy will be used, which means that the control group will receive the same exercise program when the post-intervention evaluations are finished.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Planned study design

Family based healthy lifestyle education and psycho-educational intervention

Families in the control and the exercise groups will attend both the healthy lifestyle education and psycho-education program once every 2 weeks (11 sessions over 22 weeks) for 90 min (45 min in the healthy lifestyle education program and 45 min in the psycho-educational intervention). The design of the programs has been published elsewhere [45]. Briefly, the sessions of the healthy lifestyle education and psycho-educational interventions will be developed simultaneously and delivered to both parents (or caregivers) and children, separately.

The family based healthy lifestyle education program will be conducted by experienced nutritionists. The aim of the program will be in promoting changes in lifestyle behaviors strongly associated to obesity and T2D risk: promoting healthy dietary habits (reducing the intake of sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages and energy-dense foods, enhancing the daily consumption of fruits and vegetables, promoting breakfast and eating five meals/day), increasing regular physical activity levels, reducing time spent in sedentary behaviors and promoting sleep hygiene and adequate sleep duration.

The aims of the psycho-educational program will be to provide parental skills to optimize the family environment in order to make positive changes in their lifestyles and to learn assertive communication skills. The program will also provide skills to children for managing the emotions and feelings that they are experiencing and to improve their self-esteem and psychological wellbeing.

Exercise training intervention

The exercise group will do exercise 3 days/week, 90 min per session, over a 22-week period. The program will be open to the families 5 days per week to choose a total of 3 days/week. Sessions will be designed and supervised by exercise specialists. The design of the exercise program has been published elsewhere [45]. Briefly, the program consists of cardiovascular endurance (60 min) and muscle strength exercises (10 min). The sessions also include 10 min of warm-up period, 5 min for giving instructions and 5 min of cool-down period at the end, consisting mainly of stretching exercises. Moderate to vigorous intensity aerobic workout is the main part of the exercise session (60 min) and consists of games, circuits and start-and-stop activities. The emphasis of the program is on intensity doing special emphasis on high intensity activities (above 75% of maximal heart rate (HRmax) obtained from either the cardiopulmonary exercise test in the laboratory or the 20-m shuttle run test) and enjoyment. Participants will wear a heart rate monitor (Polar RS300X) during the exercise sessions to ensure achievement of the target heart rate zone. Heart rate monitors will be programmed according to individual percentage of HRmax as follows: (1) very light intensity: from 50 to 57% of HRmax, (2) light intensity: from >57 to 64% of HRmax, (3) moderate intensity, from >64 to 76% HRmax, (4) high intensity or vigorous: from >76 to 96% HRmax and (5) maximal intensity: > 96% of HRmax.

Participant retention and adherence

The success of the intervention is strongly dependent on enjoyment and active participation. In order to motivate children’s active participation, the staff will use several strategies to celebrate success achieving the proposed objectives in both the healthy lifestyle education and the exercise programs: celebrate and recognize their efforts, reward with smiley emoticons, etc. Children who complete the program successfully will be rewarded with a certificate of completion. The attendance to the lifestyle education and psycho-education programs and of the exercise program will be recorded. Children will be marked as absent when: (1) the child does not attend the exercise session or does not participate in the proposed activities and (2) the child and at least one parent/caregiver do not attend one session of the healthy lifestyle education and psycho-educational programs.

Outcome measures for the first objective

IRS and the risk of T2D is characterized by excess adiposity, low levels of insulin sensitivity, dyslipidemia and hypertension. In the current project, the primary outcome is insulin resistance. Secondary outcome variables include total, abdominal and visceral adiposity, ectopic fat (hepatic and pancreatic fat), cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular disease risk factors and inflammation markers, hepatokines and adipokines (Table 2). Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and repeated after 22 weeks of intervention (Fig. 2). Post-intervention measurements will be scheduled within 3 days following the last healthy lifestyle program session or exercise session in the control or in the exercise group, respectively.
Table 2

Summary of the methodology of primary and secondary outcome measurements and potential confounders in the PREvention of DIabetes in KIDs (PREDIKID) study

Measure

Methodology

Primary outcomes

 Insulin resistance

Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), biochemical analyses

 Expression of miRNA in circulating exosomes and white blood cells

RNA-seq methodology

Secondary outcomes

 Physical measures

  Body mass (kg)

Scale

  Height (cm)

Stadiometer

  Waist circumference (cm)

Non-elastic tape

  Blood pressure (mmHg)

Oscillometric monitor device

  Body fat (%)

Dual X-ray absorptiometry

  Abdominal adiposity (g)

Dual X-ray absorptiometry

  Visceral abdominal adiposity (cm2)

Magnetic resonance imaging

  Hepatic fat (%)

Magnetic resonance imaging

  Pancreatic fat (%)

Magnetic resonance imaging

  Carotid intima medial thickness (mm)

Doppler ultrasonography

 Biochemical measures

  Glucose (mg/dL)

Enzymatic spectrophotometry

  Insulin, leptin, adiponectine, fetuin-A, FGF21

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

  Hemoglobin A1c

Enzymatic tests

  Total cholesterol, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)

Enzymatic spectrophotometry

  Triglycerides (mg/dL)

Enzymatic spectrophotometry

  Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)

Enzymatic tests

  Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)

Enzymatic tests

  Gamma glutamyl transferase (U/L)

Enzymatic tests

  C-reactive protein (g/dL)

Enzyme immunoassay

  TSH, T3, T4

Radioimmunoassay

  Uric acid (mg/dL)

Enzymatic spectrophotometry

  Urea, bilirubin

Enzymatic spectrophotometry

 Cardiorespiratory fitness

20-m shuttle run test

Cardiopulmonary exercise test

 Dietary assessment

24-h recalls and food frequency questionnaires

 Physical activity assessment

Accelerometry and questionnaires

 Sleeping habits

Accelerometry and questionnaires

 Sedentary behaviors

Questionnaires

Potential confounders

 Pubertal development (Tanner stage)

Physical examination

 Sociodemographic variables

 Socioeconomic status

Questionnaires

 Neonatal variables

Health booklets and questionnaires

 Family medical history

Questionnaires

 Demographic characteristics

Questionnaires

PREDIKID Prevention of Diabetes in Kids; FGF21 fibroblast growth factor 21; HDL high-density lipoprotein; LDL low-density lipoprotein; miRNA micro RNA; TSH thyroid stimulating hormone; T3 triiodothyronine; T4 free thyroxine

Primary outcome measure: insulin resistance

HOMA has been shown to be the more reliable method to assess insulin resistance in children [46]. The computer-generated HOMA will be used [47].

Secondary outcomes

Anthropometry and blood pressure

Body mass (SECA 760), height (SECA 220) and waist circumference (SECA 200) will be measured following standard protocols at least twice until consistent measures are obtained and, thereafter, Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist to height ratio will be calculated. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements will be performed following the recommendations for children [48] using an arm blood pressure oscillometric monitor device (OMRON® M6).

Total, abdominal and visceral adiposity

In children, the role of total, abdominal and visceral fat accumulation in the development of IRS, and ultimately T2D, is well established. One recent report observed that every additional 1% of adiposity at 8–10 years decreased insulin sensitivity by 2.9% 2 years later [22]. Total and abdominal adiposity will be measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (HOLOGIC, QDR 4500 W). Visceral adiposity will be measured by magnetic resonance imaging using a 1.5-T system (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a phased-array surface coil and a spine array coil. Automated visceral fat measurement will be achieved by image processing (Matlab, Matworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

Ectopic fat

Excess adiposity is associated with an accumulation of fat in multiple organs and tissues. Fat accumulation in the liver and pancreas promotes a pro-inflammatory state that may increase the risk of insulin resistance and T2D. Likewise, ectopic fat accumulation seems to be an important predictor of the onset of T2D in adolescents [49]. Insulin sensitivity was 55% lower in adolescents with hepatic steatosis compared to those without fatty liver disease. Few studies have examined fat accumulation in the pancreas and its relationship with insulin resistance and T2D. Pancreatic steatosis seems to be associated with prediabetes in children increasing the risk of T2D and cardiovascular disease [50–52]. Nevertheless, other studies reported no significant associations of pancreatic fat and β-cell dysfunction [53]. There are no previous studies examining the effect of either a lifestyle modification program or an exercise program on pancreatic fat. Hepatic and pancreatic fat will be measured by magnetic resonance imaging using a 1.5-T system (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a phased-array surface coil and a spine array coil.

Cardiorespiratory fitness

Cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent predictor of T2D in adults [54]. In youths, there is evidence indicating a negative association between cardiorespiratory fitness and insulin resistance [55]. Moreover, previous reports suggested that that the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and T2D may be mediated by an increased susceptibility to fat deposition in liver and pancreas, increasing thereby insulin resistance [49, 56]. Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed by two different tests as published elsewhere [45]: (1) the 20-m shuttle run test [57]. We will use the equation reported by Léger et al. [57] to estimate the maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max, ml/kg/min) from the 20-m shuttle run test scores and (2) direct cardiopulmonary exercise progressive incremental treadmill test using the modified American College of Sports Medicine protocol with respiratory gas analysis to exhaustion [58].

Carotid intima-media thickness

Early changes of atherosclerosis can be detected assessing carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). In adolescents with T2D, Shah et al. reported that every 1% increase in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or each year increase of the duration of the disease was associated with 30% higher cIMT [59]. In children with obesity, cIMT was higher in those with prediabetes than in their counterparts with normal glucose tolerance [60]. cIMT will be measured by ultrasound (General Electric, Logic S8 model) according to international recommendations. All studies will be done following a standardized scanning protocol for the right and left common carotid arteries. The common carotid artery bulb will be identified and the segments of common carotid arteries 1–2 cm proximal to the bulb region will be scanned. During the end of the diastole cIMT will be measured in both carotids four times and mean cIMT and maximal cIMT will be calculated. Also in telediastole, two sides of maximal diameter of the common carotid, bulb and internal carotid will be measured.

Inflammation and biochemical cardiovascular disease risk factors

The obesity-associated chronic inflammatory process participates in the onset of T2D, although the underlying mechanisms are not well understood [61, 62]. Several studies have suggested that inflammatory cytokines may influence insulin sensitivity, both directly and also indirectly mediated, by adipokines, such as leptin and adiponectin, and hepatokines such as fetuin-A and fibroblast-21 growth factor (FGF-21) [62–65]. Biochemical variables will be measured from venous fasting blood samples obtained from each child by experienced nurses. Blood samples will be immediately centrifuged, aliquoted and stored at −80 °C or below. This permits the measurement of a full set of cardiovascular markers including lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides), glucose, insulin, HbA1c, cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin (IL)-6) adipokines (e.g., leptin and adiponectin), hepatokines (fetuin-A and FGF-21), liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase), C-reactive protein and uric acid. ELISA kits, Western blots and High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy will be used to perform these analyses.

Physical activity, sedentary behavior, dietary assessment and sleep

We will assess all these lifestyle behaviors both at the beginning and the end of the intervention. Children will wear an accelerometer on the non-dominant wrist (ActiSleep, Actigraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) for seven consecutive days for 24 h to record physical activity intensity levels and patterns, as well as sleeping habits and participants will also complete a diary log. Sedentary behaviors, such as watching TV, playing computer games, playing video games or phone games and surfing the Internet, will be self-reported by the children using validated questionnaires [66]. Dietary intake will be evaluated by two non-consecutive 24-h recalls within a period of 7 days by nutritionists and a self-reported semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Outcome measures for the second objective

Recently, miRNAs have emerged as key regulators of gene expression. T2D is associated with changes in the level of several miRNAs in pancreatic β-cells as well as in tissues such as liver, skeletal muscle or adipose tissue [67, 68]. Moreover, miRNA expression seems to participate in the regulation of the IRS mediated by the regulation of inflammatory processes [39]. As has been mentioned in previous sections, the second primary aim of the present work is to characterize the miRNA species present in circulating white blood cells and exosomes, before and after the intervention program is applied. Our initial hypothesis is that the application of this program will have a direct impact on the miRNA species present in blood cells and exosomes, and that these changes will influence the physiological effects elicited by the exercise program.

Extraction and isolation of miRNAs from white blood cells and plasma

Exosomes will be obtained from 1 ml of plasma using the Total Exosome Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following manufacturer’s protocols. RNA molecules will be isolated from white blood cells (buffy coat) and exosomal fractions using Qiagen miRNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Once isolated, RNA will be quantified using a fluorimetric method.

Analysis and validation of miRNAs

Species of miRNA present on samples of individual subjects, before and after the intervention program, will be analyzed using RNA-seq methodology on Illumina’s MiSeq Next Generation Sequencing system. This workflow allows one to fully characterize the miRNA profile present in the samples analyzed (exosomes and white blood cells) and to quantify the expression levels of different miRNA species. In this sense, effects of the intervention program on the miRNA profile and on expression level of specific species can be inferred. Briefly, Illumina’s TruSeq Small RNA Sample preparation kit will be used to generate sequencing libraries, from 1 μg of total RNA isolated from previous samples (either exosomes or white blood cells). Only 145 to 160 bp libraries will be selected for sequencing, as they include miRNA species (22–30 bp plus adapters). Sequencing reactions will be performed on Illumina’s MiSeq Reagent Kit V3, which supports to multiplex up to 10 samples on a single run, and single reads of 50 nt in length. Analysis of results, FASTQ files generation and sequence alignment will be performed using specific software packages (MiSeq Reporter, Bowtie, SAMtools, DESeq2 and miRDeep).

Confounding variables

Puberty stage

At baseline, the pediatrician will evaluate Tanner staging by direct-examination breast palpation in girls and testicular measurement by orchidometer in boys.

Sociodemographic variables

Information about socioeconomic status, demographic characteristics and family medical history of obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension will be collected. Socioeconomic status will be evaluated using The Family Affluence Scale [69] and parental education level and parental occupation. As demographic characteristics, date of birth, sex, ethnicity and family structure will be recorded.

Assessment of side effects

All adverse effects or health problems attributable to the testing or exercise sessions will be recorded.

Data management and monitoring

Participants’ data will be identified only by a study number (starting with 001) and only the principal investigator and study coordinator will have access to identifiers that can link the data to the individual participant. Participants who drop out will be noted and their reasons documented. Data will be entered and stored on a standalone computer into excel and SPSS data files, and the information will be password protected. We will assure the quality of data entry by random checking of the data entered. Study data is only accessible by the researchers involved in the trial, and only the principal investigator and investigators in the project will have access to the data for analysis. The investigators will monitor that the informed consent process is conducted appropriately and that informed consent was obtained prior to proceeding with any study procedures. Only participants who meet study eligibility criteria will be enrolled. Data will be kept for 10 years after the research is completed and all data (electronic and hard copy) will be destroyed after the storage period. There is no data monitoring committee due to the characteristics of the current study.

Data analyses plan

All outcome variables will be checked for normality and results will be expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and ranges. Multiple regression analyses will be performed to examine the potential independent predictors of T2D risk. At baseline, differences in continuous variables between groups (control group vs. exercise group) will be analyzed by Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Differences in categorical variables at baseline between the two groups will be explored by chi-squared tests. Repeated-measured analysis of variance will be used to assess the effect of exercise (time (pre-post 22-weeks’ intervention) × group interactions) on the primary (insulin resistance) and secondary study (adiposity, ectopic fat, cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular disease risk factors, inflammation markers, etc.) outcomes and the intention-to-treat principle will be applied. For sensitivity analyses, we will analyze the effect of the adherence to the program on the results of the intervention.

Data dissemination plan

The principal investigator will inform the parents about their child’s health before and after the intervention program. The main results of the trial will be communicated to the health care professionals (pediatricians) in Vitoria-Gasteiz and other relevant groups (e.g., university academics), as well as to the public. Scientific articles will be also written.

Discussion

The worldwide obesity pandemic and the increasing prevalence of T2D at younger ages are important public health issues with both individual and social costs. Likewise, research focusing on the prevention of T2D in pre-adolescent children is a high priority for public health. Scientific associations emphasize the need for evidence-based adiposity and IRS control treatments that may reduce T2D risk in children at a high risk [6].

The primary aim of the PREDIKID project is to test the effect of a multidisciplinary program including supervised exercise in the reduction of IRS in pre-adolescents at a high risk to develop T2D that could serve as preventive model of T2D in childhood. The families participating in the study will receive an educational program including lifestyle, psychological and emotional aspects that the scientific literature implicates in the development and progression of obesity and T2D risk in childhood. Moreover, the exercise intervention of the PREDIKID study will obtain objective data about the effect of high intensity exercise on metabolic variables closely associated to T2D risk in children, such as insulin resistance, HbA1c, ectopic fat, total, abdominal and visceral adiposity, cIMT, cardiorespiratory fitness, adipokines, hepatokines and cytokines, blood pressure or lipid profile. We will examine clinical outcomes intimately associated with T2D using innovative technology and reference methods. Likewise, the PREDIKID project will help to better understand the relationship between hepatic and pancreatic fat and IRS and risk of T2D in children. In addition, the current study may offer relevant clinical information about the efficacy of a family based multidisciplinary intervention program that includes exercise on reducing ectopic fat, IRS and cardiovascular disease risk factors in children at a high risk of T2D.

The pathophysiology of childhood obesity and associated comorbidities, such as T2D, is not well established. To date it is not clear why some children develop IRS and T2D, while others show the metabolically healthy phenotype [70]. Biomarkers for early detection of children at risk of T2D would greatly improve the care of children with overweight/obesity. Hence, there is a need to search for clinically relevant markers with prognostic value for intervention success. Recently, miRNAs have been proposed as promising biomarkers in terms of both diagnosis and prognosis of obesity-related comorbidities [71, 72]. The PREDIKID project will help to identify miRNAs potentially associated with early onset of IRS in children with overweight/obesity. Moreover, the differential expression and responses in circulating miRNAs between the control group and the exercise group may help to understand the underlying mechanisms of the effect of exercise on IRS, as well as to predict individual variability to the intervention in overweight/obese children.

Trial status

The recruitment started on March 2017, and is expected to finish in September 2018.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

cIMT: 

Carotid intima-media thickness

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

HOMA: 

Homeostatic model assessment

HRmax: 

Maximal heart rate

IRS: 

Insulin resistance syndrome

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein

miRNAs: 

MicroRNAs

PREDIKID: 

Prevention of Diabetes in Kids

T2D: 

Type-2 diabetes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the pediatricians for their participation in the recruitment, the members involved in the assessments for their efforts and to Siemens Medical Systems for supplying the software to quantify hepatic fat, and to the pre- and post-graduate students for their collaboration in the exercise training sessions.

Funding

The current project was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Industry and Competitiveness (DEP2016-78377-R), by “Fondos Estructurales de la Unión Europea (FEDER), Una manera de hacer Europa.” and by the University of the Basque Country (GIU14/21). This work was also supported by grants from Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (RYC-2010-05957; RYC-2011-09011), Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (FPU14/03329) and by the Education, Linguistic Policy and Culture Department of the Government of the Basque Country (PRE_2016_1_0057).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

IL conceived the study and drafted the manuscript; IL, FOB and JM participated in its design. LA, MM, MA, EM and IL designed the intervention programs; BRR, ID, IT, MG, EA and EL are members of the assessment staff. All the authors critically read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethic Committee of Clinical Investigation of Euskadi (PI2014045). All parents or legal guardians will sign an informed written consent and all the children will give their assent before being enrolled in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nutrition, Exercise and Health Research group, Elikadura, Ariketa Fisikoa eta Osasuna, ELIKOS group, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
(2)
Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Osatek, University Hospital of Alava (HUA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
(3)
Paediatric Endocrinology Unit, University Hospital of Araba (HUA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
(4)
Computational Intelligence Group, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Donostia, Spain
(5)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Araba (HUA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
(6)
Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain
(7)
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Araba (HUA), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
(8)
Technological Services Division, Health and quality of life, TECNALIA, Miñano, Spain
(9)
Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
(10)
Georgia Prevention Institute, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
(11)
PROmoting FITness and Health through physical activity research group (PROFITH), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Grenada, Spain
(12)
Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

References

  1. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on Type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med. 2007;24:451–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pulgaron ER, Delamater AM. Obesity and type 2 diabetes in children: epidemiology and treatment. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:508.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Skinner AC, Perrin EM, Moss LA, Skelton JA. Cardiometabolic risks and severity of obesity in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1307–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rhodes ET, Prosser LA, Hoerger TJ, Lieu T, Ludwig DS, Laffel LM. Estimated morbidity and mortality in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29:453–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Amutha A, Mohan V. Diabetes complications in childhood and adolescent onset type 2 diabetes—a review. J Diabetes Complicat. 2016;30:951–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. American Diabetes Association. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl):S36–8.Google Scholar
  7. Mechanick JI, Hurley DL, Garvey WT. Adiposity based chronic disease as a new diagnostic term: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology Position Statement. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:327–8.Google Scholar
  8. Steinberger J, Daniels SR. Obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in children: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young Committee (Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young) and the Diabetes Committee (Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism). Circulation. 2003;107:1448–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Bonito P, Pacifico L, Chiesa C, Valerio G, Miraglia Del Giudice E, Maffeis C, Morandi A, Invitti C, Licenziati MR, Loche S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40:409–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Molnar D. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28 Suppl 3:S70–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Onge ES, Miller SA, Motycka C, DeBerry A. A review of the treatment of type 2 diabetes in children. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015;20:4–16.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Verbestel V, De Henauw S, Barba G, Eiben G, Gallois K, Hadjigeorgiou C, Konstabel K, Maes L, Marild S, Molnar D, et al. Effectiveness of the IDEFICS intervention on objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in European children. Obes Rev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:57–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, Wilson RF, Weston C, Fawole O, Bleich SN, Cheskin LJ, Showell NN, Lau BD, et al. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:547–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Reinehr T. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. World J Diabetes. 2013;4:270–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004;5 Suppl 1:4–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Malik VS, Hu FB. Fructose and cardiometabolic health: what the evidence from sugar-sweetened beverages tells us. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1615–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rouhani MH, Haghighatdoost F, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L. Associations between dietary energy density and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrition. 2016;32:1037–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mollard RC, Senechal M, MacIntosh AC, Hay J, Wicklow BA, Wittmeier KD, Sellers EA, Dean HJ, Ryner L, Berard L, McGavock JM. Dietary determinants of hepatic steatosis and visceral adiposity in overweight and obese youth at risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:804–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook LT, O’Reilly GA, Goran MI, Weigensberg MJ, Spruijt-Metz D, Davis JN. Vegetable consumption is linked to decreased visceral and liver fat and improved insulin resistance in overweight Latino youth. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1776–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. House BT, Cook LT, Gyllenhammer LE, Schraw JM, Goran MI, Spruijt-Metz D, Weigensberg MJ, Davis JN. Meal skipping linked to increased visceral adipose tissue and triglycerides in overweight minority youth. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22:E77–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. House BT, Shearrer GE, Miller SJ, Pasch KE, Goran MI, Davis JN. Increased eating frequency linked to decreased obesity and improved metabolic outcomes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39:136–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson M, Benedetti A, Barnett TA, Mathieu ME, Deladoey J, Gray-Donald K. Influence of adiposity, physical activity, fitness, and screen time on insulin dynamics over 2 years in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:227–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sayin FK, Buyukinan M. Sleep duration and media time have a major impact on insulin resistance and metabolic risk factors in obese children and adolescents. Child Obes. 2016;12:272–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. De Bernardi Rodrigues AM, da Silva CC, Vasques AC, Camilo DF, Barreiro F, Cassani RS, Zambon MP, Antonio MA, Geloneze B. Association of sleep deprivation with reduction in insulin sensitivity as assessed by the hyperglycemic clamp technique in adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:487–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilfley DE, Staiano AE, Altman M, Lindros J, Lima A, Hassink SG, Dietz WH, Cook S. Improving access and systems of care for evidence-based childhood obesity treatment: conference key findings and next steps. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25:16–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Elovainio M, Pulkki-Raback L, Hakulinen C, Lehtimaki T, Jokinen E, Ronnemaa T, Mikkila V, Tossavainen P, Jula A, Hutri-Kahonen N, et al. Psychosocial environment in childhood and body mass index growth over 32 years. Prev Med. 2017;97:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Olive LS, Telford RM, Byrne DG, Abhayaratna WP, Telford RD. Psychological distress leads to reduced physical activity and fitness in children: the Australian longitudinal LOOK study. J Behav Med. 2016;39:587–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rankin J, Matthews L, Cobley S, Han A, Sanders R, Wiltshire HD, Baker JS. Psychological consequences of childhood obesity: psychiatric comorbidity and prevention. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:125–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkie HJ, Standage M, Gillison FB, Cumming SP, Katzmarzyk PT. Multiple lifestyle behaviours and overweight and obesity among children aged 9–11 years: results from the UK site of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010677.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Nemet D, Barkan S, Epstein Y, Friedland O, Kowen G, Eliakim A. Short- and long-term beneficial effects of a combined dietary-behavioral-physical activity intervention for the treatment of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e443–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pivovarov JA, Taplin CE, Riddell MC. Current perspectives on physical activity and exercise for youth with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015;16:242–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Marson EC, Delevatti RS, Prado AK, Netto N, Kruel LF. Effects of aerobic, resistance, and combined exercise training on insulin resistance markers in overweight or obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2016;93:211–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis CL, Pollock NK, Waller JL, Allison JD, Dennis BA, Bassali R, Melendez A, Boyle CA, Gower BA. Exercise dose and diabetes risk in overweight and obese children: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308:1103–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Panera N, Gnani D, Crudele A, Ceccarelli S, Nobili V, Alisi A. MicroRNAs as controlled systems and controllers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15079–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Campion J, Milagro FI, Martinez JA. Individuality and epigenetics in obesity. Obes Rev. 2009;10:383–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang X, Tang G, Ozcan S. Role of microRNAs in diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1779:697–701.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Dehwah MA, Xu A, Huang Q. MicroRNAs and type 2 diabetes/obesity. J Genet Genomics. 2012;39:11–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Rovira O, Guerra E, Esteve E, Xifra G, Martinez C, Ricart W, Rieusset J, et al. Profiling of circulating microRNAs reveals common microRNAs linked to type 2 diabetes that change with insulin sensitization. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1375–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Abente EJ, Subramanian M, Ramachandran V, Najafi-Shoushtari SH. MicroRNAs in obesity-associated disorders. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;589:108–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Parrizas M, Brugnara L, Esteban Y, Gonzalez-Franquesa A, Canivell S, Murillo S, Gordillo-Bastidas E, Cusso R, Cadefau JA, Garcia-Roves PM, et al. Circulating miR-192 and miR-193b are markers of prediabetes and are modulated by an exercise intervention. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E407–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Khalyfa A, Kheirandish-Gozal L, Bhattacharjee R, Khalyfa AA, Gozal D. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in obese children. Chest. 2016;149:786–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. American Diabetes Association. Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:381–9.Google Scholar
  43. Ferguson MA, Gutin B, Le NA, Karp W, Litaker M, Humphries M, Okuyama T, Riggs S, Owens S. Effects of exercise training and its cessation on components of the insulin resistance syndrome in obese children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:889–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Owens S, Gutin B, Allison J, Riggs S, Ferguson M, Litaker M, Thompson W. Effect of physical training on total and visceral fat in obese children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:143–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Medrano M, Maiz E, Maldonado-Martin S, Arenaza L, Rodriguez-Vigil B, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Larrarte E, Diez-Lopez I, Sarasua-Miranda A, et al. The effect of a multidisciplinary intervention program on hepatic adiposity in overweight-obese children: protocol of the EFIGRO study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:346–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Keskin M, Kurtoglu S, Kendirci M, Atabek ME, Yazici C. Homeostasis model assessment is more reliable than the fasting glucose/insulin ratio and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index for assessing insulin resistance among obese children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e500–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1487–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. NHBPEP: National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114:555–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wittmeier KD, Wicklow BA, MacIntosh AC, Sellers EA, Ryner LN, Serrai H, Gardiner PF, Dean HJ, McGavock JM. Hepatic steatosis and low cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1034–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Alderete TL, Toledo-Corral CM, Goran MI. Metabolic basis of ethnic differences in diabetes risk in overweight and obese youth. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:455.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Toledo-Corral CM, Alderete TL, Hu HH, Nayak K, Esplana S, Liu T, Goran MI, Weigensberg MJ. Ectopic fat deposition in prediabetic overweight and obese minority adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1115–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Le KA, Ventura EE, Fisher JQ, Davis JN, Weigensberg MJ, Punyanitya M, Hu HH, Nayak KS, Goran MI. Ethnic differences in pancreatic fat accumulation and its relationship with other fat depots and inflammatory markers. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:485–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Wicklow BA, Griffith AT, Dumontet JN, Venugopal N, Ryner LN, McGavock JM. Pancreatic lipid content is not associated with beta cell dysfunction in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39:398–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jae SY, Franklin BA, Choo J, Yoon ES, Choi YH, Park WH. Fitness, body habitus, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korean men. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:585–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Rizzo NS, Villa I, Hurtig-Wennlof A, Oja L, Sjostrom M. High cardiovascular fitness is associated with low metabolic risk score in children: the European Youth Heart Study. Pediatr Res. 2007;61:350–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Senechal M, Wicklow B, Wittmeier K, Hay J, MacIntosh AC, Eskicioglu P, Venugopal N, McGavock JM. Cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity in metabolically healthy overweight and obese youth. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e85–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6:93–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS. ACSM’s new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12:215–17.Google Scholar
  59. Shah AS, Dolan LM, Kimball TR, Gao Z, Khoury PR, Daniels SR, Urbina EM. Influence of duration of diabetes, glycemic control, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors on early atherosclerotic vascular changes in adolescents and young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3740–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Shah AS, Gao Z, Urbina EM, Kimball TR, Dolan LM. Prediabetes: the effects on arterial thickness and stiffness in obese youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:1037–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Donath MY. Multiple benefits of targeting inflammation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2016;59:679–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Syrenicz A, Garanty-Bogacka B, Syrenicz M, Gebala A, Walczak M. Low-grade systemic inflammation and the risk of type 2 diabetes in obese children and adolescents. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27:453–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Reinehr T, Karges B, Meissner T, Wiegand S, Fritsch M, Holl RW, Woelfle J. Fibroblast growth factor 21 and fetuin-A in obese adolescents with and without type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3004–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Reinehr T, Woelfle J, Wiegand S, Karges B, Meissner T, Nagl K, Holl RW. Leptin but not adiponectin is related to type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17(4):281–8.Google Scholar
  65. Reinehr T, Karges B, Meissner T, Wiegand S, Stoffel-Wagner B, Holl RW, Woelfle J. Inflammatory markers in obese adolescents with type 2 diabetes and their relationship to hepatokines and adipokines. J Pediatr. 2016.Google Scholar
  66. Rey-Lopez JP, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Martinez-Gomez D, De Henauw S, Manios Y, Molnar D, Polito A, Verloigne M, et al. Sedentary patterns and media availability in European adolescents: The HELENA study. Prev Med. 2010;51:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Guay C, Regazzi R. Circulating microRNAs as novel biomarkers for diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:513–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Guay C, Regazzi R. New emerging tasks for microRNAs in the control of beta-cell activities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861:2121–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Currie CE, Elton RA, Todd J, Platt S. Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ Res. 1997;12:385–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ortega FB, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2016;118:1752–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Deiuliis JA. MicroRNAs as regulators of metabolic disease: pathophysiologic significance and emerging role as biomarkers and therapeutics. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40:88–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Khalyfa A, Gozal D. Exosomal miRNAs as potential biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in children. J Transl Med. 2014;12:162.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215