Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an 8-week overground walking with paretic lower limb loading on spatiotemporal gait parameters and motor function among chronic stroke survivors: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial



Post-stroke gait deviations contribute to significant functional disability, impaired walking ability and poor quality of life. Prior studies suggest that gait training with paretic lower limb loading may improve gait parameters and walking ability in post-stroke. However, most gait training methods used in these studies are not readily available, and studies using cheaper methods are limited.


The purpose of this study is to describe a protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an 8-week overground walking with paretic lower limb loading on spatiotemporal gait parameters and motor function among chronic stroke survivors.


This is a two-center, single-blind, two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. Forty-eight stroke survivors with mild to moderate disability will be recruited from two tertiary facilities and randomly assigned into two intervention arms; overground walking with paretic lower limb loading or overground walking without paretic lower limb loading in a 1:1 ratio. All interventions will be administered thrice weekly for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes will be step length and gait speed whereas the secondary outcomes will include step length symmetry ratio, stride length, stride length symmetry ratio, stride width, cadence and motor function. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 4, 8 and 20 weeks after the start of intervention.


This will be the first randomised controlled trial to report the effects of overground walking with paretic lower limb loading on spatiotemporal gait parameters and motor function among chronic stroke survivors from low-resource setting.

Trial registration NCT05097391. Registered on 27 October 2021.

Peer Review reports


Stroke remains the second leading cause of death and disability internationally and imposes a considerable personal and societal burden [1]. The health and economic costs associated with stroke are huge and alarming [2, 3]; thus, it poses a major public health problem and warrants development and implementation of optimal primary prevention and rehabilitation strategies to reduce the burden of the disease and its impact [1, 4].

The global incidence and prevalence of stroke have been estimated to be around 11.9 and 104.2 million, respectively [1] and expected to increase in the coming years, especially in low- and middle-income countries [5]. This is more problematic particularly in Sub-Saharan African countries due to limited resources and poor education on stroke risk factors and its warning signs besides the growing and ageing population [4, 6]. The crude prevalence and incidence rates of stroke in Nigeria have been reported to be 1460 per 100,000 and 25 per 100,000 person-years, respectively [7]. Moreover, stroke in Nigeria accounts for approximately 78% of neurological admissions [8], with mortality rates ranging between 21 and 45% [9,10,11,12,13]. The rising prevalence of stroke in Nigeria means the burden may continue to exacerbate pressure on the affected individuals, their families, health and economic systems [14, 15].

Stroke survivors typically exhibit varying neurological deficits and impairments including sensory, cognitive, perceptual, emotional, speech and motor abnormalities [16, 17]. The most important motor deficit post-stroke is hemiparesis contralateral to the cerebrovascular event [17]. This deficit reduces the capacity of the affected lower limb to maintain normal functions such as balance and initiation and control of movements, hence resulting in abnormal gait pattern (i.e. hemiplegic gait) [18, 19].

Post-stroke abnormal gait patterns contribute to significant functional disability, impaired walking ability and poor quality of life [20]. Gait asymmetry implies an imbalance in functional activities between two sides of the body or lower limb [21]. Post-stroke hemiparetic gait is caused by motor impairments such as altered muscle tone, lack of selective motor control, abnormal reflex, poor balance and weakness [22]. Asymmetrical spatial and temporal gait characteristics are common deviations observed in post-stroke hemiplegic gait. It has been documented that about 44–62% and 48–82% of stroke survivors exhibit asymmetry in spatial and temporal gait parameters, respectively [23, 24].

Observational studies have shown that post-stroke hemiparetic gait relative to the normal is significantly characterised by short step length and stride length, reduced cadence, low gait speed, increased step width, double support phases and asymmetric single limb loading [25,26,27,28]. After stroke, the paretic limb exhibits a prolonged period of swing and a reduced period of stance; as a result, decreased swing time and increased stance time are seen on the non-paretic limb [29]. These changes are believed to result from decreased walking speed as well as disturbances in other gait parameters between the paretic and non-paretic limbs which may limit gains from rehabilitation [30].

Gait asymmetry does not only affect gait quality in stroke but may also increase energy expenditure [31] and risk of falls [32] and causes loss of bone density of the hemiparetic lower limb [33]. Restoring gait symmetry is, therefore, a major goal for rehabilitation to enhance walking ability and safety, activities of daily living and quality of life among stroke survivors [34].

Despite rehabilitation efforts to improve gait in individuals with stroke, some patients still are unable to walk functionally [35,36,37]. It appears that many stroke survivors usually do not have significant improvement in gait function [38], and this is often due to inefficient weight application (limb loading) on the affected side causing non-linear limb load transfer [39]. Thus, it is conceivable that adding weight to the paretic limb may correct this imbalance and improve gait performance via an interlimb neural coupling mechanism [40]. Indeed, previous studies on healthy subjects indicate that the addition of small weights to limbs can enhance muscle activation [41, 42], balance ability [43] and walking factors such as distance, velocity and cadence [44].

A previous pretest-posttest pilot study conducted among individuals with chronic stroke found that the addition of a sandbag equivalent to 5% of body weight to ankle of paretic lower limb during weight-bearing treadmill training improved gait velocity, ability to climb stairs and increased ratio of swing phase of both paretic and non-paretic lower limb [45]. In a non-controlled study on chronic stroke patients, the addition of preferred cuff weight (0.7 kg or 1.1 kg) to ankle of paretic lower limb during aquatic treadmill walking decreased unwanted limb floatation and increased stance phase stability [46]. Similarly, in a recent pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine the effects of aquatic treadmill gait training with water-jet resistance versus underwater treadmill gait training with ankle weights in chronic stroke patients, both training methods improved static and dynamic balance and gait parameters including gait velocity, cadence, step length, stride length and swing phase with water-jet resistance training being more superior [47]. However, underwater treadmill may not be readily available and affordable in low-resource settings. Hence, there is need to devise low-cost and effective methods for gait retraining for stroke survivors in such contexts. It is worth noting that studies in the way of RCTs on the effect of overground walking with paretic lower limb loading in chronic stroke survivors are limited. Compared to underwater or land-based treadmill walk training, overground walk training is easy to perform and relatively cheaper and affordable.

The primary aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an 8-week overground walking with paretic lower limb loading compared with overground walking without paretic lower limb loading on step length and gait speed among chronic stroke survivors. The secondary aims were to compare the effects of these interventions on step length symmetry ratio, stride length, stride length symmetry ratio, stride width, cadence and motor function. We hypothesised that overground walking with paretic lower limb loading will have superior effects  on step length and gait speed compared with overground walking without paretic lower limb loading.


Ethical considerations

This study has been approved by the Health and Research Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Kano State, Nigeria (ref: NHREC/17/03/2018). The purpose and procedure of the study will be explained to all participants, and their written consent will be obtained.

Study design

This study will be a single-blind, parallel group, two-arm, RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio. The time schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments of participants are shown in Fig. 1. The study protocol is reported in line with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Checklist (See Appendix I).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timetable for enrolment, interventions and assessments

Study setting

The study will be conducted in the physiotherapy outpatient departments of Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital (MMSH) and Muhammadu Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hospital (MAWTH), Kano State, Northwestern, Nigeria.

Training of research assistants

Six licenced physiotherapists (including the primary researcher) with at least five years of working experience in stroke rehabilitation will be engaged in the study. Three therapists including the primary researcher (first author) will be responsible for all aspects of the local organisation including identification, scheduling and screening of potential participants, as well as obtaining written informed consent. The primary researcher with another therapist will administer intervention to the participants. Another two therapists (not involved in screening or administration of intervention) will perform baseline and follow-up assessments. All the research assistants will receive a one-day training session, facilitated by the primary researcher, on the study procedures prior to the beginning of the study. They will be assessed to ensure conversancy and familiarity with the study procedures.

Participants’ recruitment

The study participants will be drawn from a population of patients with stroke referred for outpatient physiotherapy at MMSH and MAWTH in Kano State. They will be given all the necessary information about the procedures and potential benefits of the study. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants after assessment for eligibility. To be eligible for the study, patients must meet the following criteria: (1) unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke occurring at least 3 months before enrolment; (2) male or female between the age of 20 and 70 years; (3) Having Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) scores of 1, 2 or 3 and also able to walk at least 10 m independently without assistive device; and (4) ability to follow verbal instructions. Patients with one or more of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: (1) cognitive impairments; (2) visual impairments; (3) musculoskeletal disorders that may affect gait such as arthritis; (4) other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis; (5) cardio-respiratory conditions that may limit participation such as atelectasis; and (6) concurrent participation in other interventional clinical trials.

Demographic and clinical characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, education level, occupational level, duration of stroke, laterality, leg dominance, blood pressure, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), side of affectation and MRS scores will be obtained using a prepared study proforma. Assessment of baseline outcome variables will be then conducted prior to randomisation. A specific ID will be given to all participants for recognition.

Randomisation and blinding

Upon completion of all the baseline assessments, consenting participants will be stratified by MRS scores (i.e. 1, 2 and 3) and randomised into two groups; overground walking with paretic lower limb loading or overground walking without paretic lower limb loading in a 1:1 ratio (Fig. 2) by a third party not involved in other aspects of the study. Allocation of participants will be concealed using consecutive numbered, sealed and opaque envelopes prepared using a web-based randomisation tool (available at with permuted block size of 6. All outcome assessors will be blinded to participants’ group allocation. However, it will be impossible to blind physiotherapists and participants considering the nature of the study interventions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flowchart showing flow of participants through the study

Study interventions

Overground walking with paretic lower limb loading group

Participants assigned to this group will first receive 5 min warm-up, followed by 15 min conventional exercise, 15–25 min overground walking with paretic lower limb loading, and lastly 5 min cool-down. The warm-up and cool-down will be the same and consist of passive stretching to hamstrings and calf muscles, and a range of motion exercise to the lower limbs. The conventional exercise consists of active-assisted exercises (AAEs) to the lower limbs on the mat, followed by strength training such as sit-to-stand and squatting exercises. For the AAE, assistance will be provided manually by an external force (therapist’s hand) when the participants’ muscle strength is inadequate to complete the motion. For the strength training, participants will perform the sit-to-stand exercise using a comfortable chair at their own pace which will be later progressed to squatting exercises by holding a parallel bar.

The procedure for the overground walking with lower limb loading is similar to that described by Abba et al. [48] except for the addition of weight to the paretic lower limb and increase in intensity of walking in the current study. The walking will be conducted on a flat surface of 15 × 10 m dimensions in the physiotherapy gymnasium. Participants will undergo to and fro overground walk with a 1.5-kg sandbag attached to the paretic limb. The 1.5-kg sandbag was chosen based on the findings of our pilot study (unpublished data) conducted on 18 chronic stroke survivors. We found this weight to be the most comfortable and tolerable weight for overground walking among stroke patients who presented with mild to moderate disability based on the scores of the MRS. Prior to the overground walking, participants will be asked to sit in a relaxed position on a chair with their feet on the ground. The selected weight will be strapped 2 cm above the ankle of the paretic lower limb with the malleoli being the reference point [43]. The strapping will be done in such a way that it is not loose or too tight to give discomfort to the participants while carrying out the training. Afterwards, the participants will be instructed to stand and then walk to and fro a 10-m path (within 15 × 10 m dimensions) labeled with adhesive tape to guide the walking in a straight line. Each participant will be instructed to walk with standardised instruction “walk at your normal, comfortable pace” [49] for 5 min after which they will be asked to stop and rest for 2 min. The training will be repeated 3 times in the first 2 weeks of the study (15 min), 4 times in weeks 3–4 of the study (20 min), and 5 times in weeks 5–8 of the study (25 min). Weight will be unloaded from the paretic limb after completing the training session. The participants will be monitored throughout as they carry out the training, and those reporting symptoms of exertional intolerance outside the target zone (i.e. 12–14) on Borg’s rate of perceived exertion (RPE) scale [50] would be terminated at any time. Treatment will be delivered individually, thrice weekly for 8 weeks. The duration of the training session is expected to last from 40 min in the first week to 50 min in the 8th week. Details of the duration and progression of the study interventions are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Duration and progression of the study interventions

Overground walking without paretic limb loading group

Participants allocated to this group will undergo the same intervention as described for the overground walking with paretic lower limb loading group except that weight will not be applied to the participants’ paretic limb. Treatment will be delivered individually, thrice weekly for 8 weeks. The duration of the training session is expected to last from 40 min in the first week to 50 min in the 8th week. Details of the duration and progression of the study interventions are provided in Table 1.

Outcome assessments and follow-ups

The primary outcomes will be step length and gait speed whereas the secondary outcomes will be step length symmetry ratio, stride length, stride length symmetry ratio, stride width, cadence and motor function (Table 2). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline prior to randomisation, 4, 8 and 20 weeks after the start of intervention. All participants will be reminded about their follow-ups via phone call on regular basis.

Table 2 Description of primary and secondary outcomes and time points of assessments

Measurement of spatial gait parameters

The spatial gait parameters of the participants in both groups will be recorded using the footprint method as described by previous publications [55,56,57]. Footprints provide a simple and economical method from which step length, stride length, foot angle and stride width can be measured. While sitting on the chair, a pair of flat shoes (slippers) will be given to the participant to wear. Different sizes will be provided to the participants to suit their foot size. All the shoes will be provided with a strap that will be tied to the affected heel to avoid missing steps during the gait training. Ink paste will be applied at the bottom of the participant’s shoes. They will be then asked to stand and walk with the instruction “walk as you normally do” across the 10-m path (as described in the procedure for overground walking training) and footprint sequences from the ground surface will be recorded. The participants will be asked to look directly forward during walking as observing the footprints could alter their gait patterns. At least six footprints will be obtained. The first few steps of the gait footprints will be disregarded because they may not be indicating the stable gait of the participants. Spatial gait parameters will be measured from the footprints using a measuring tape for each of the selected gait components. Each participant will perform three trials of walking and the spatial gait parameters will be recorded in each trial; the average will be then computed. The measurements will be recorded to the nearest centimeters for both the loaded paretic lower limb and non-loaded paretic lower limb during the overground training (Fig. 3). All the parameters will be measured and recorded separately for each leg. The ground floor will be cleaned and mopped to be cleared for the next participant. The spatial gait parameters and symmetry to be measured are fully described in Table 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Measurement of stride length (distance AB), step length (distance CD), step width (distance EC) and stride width (FG)

Measurement of temporal gait parameters

Similar to the measurement for the spatial gait parameters and symmetry, each participant will perform three trials of walking and the temporal gait parameters (gait speed and cadence) will be recorded in each trial; the average will be then computed. Measurements will be carried out in seconds using a stopwatch each for the loaded paretic lower limb and non-loaded paretic lower limb during the overground training (Table 2).

Measurement of motor function

Lower limb motor function of the participants will be assessed using the Motricity Index. Description on how the motor function will be measured is fully provided in Table 2.

Adverse events

Adverse events of therapeutic exercise are well known due to their wide application in the healthcare sector. Expected non-serious adverse events related to exercise interventions may include fatigue, falls, muscle soreness or cramps, dizziness and excessive blood pressure responses. Expected serious adverse events include transient ischemic attack (TIA), recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction and sudden death. Based on the findings of our pilot study (unpublished data), no adverse events were reported. However, all participants in this trial will be informed during recruitment of the possibility of experiencing serious and non-serious adverse events. The physiotherapists responsible for treatment will closely monitor the patients during the overground walking training. Adverse events will be reported immediately to the trial management committee which is identical to the authors of this protocol in addition to a physician for prompt action. Adverse events will be also reported to the research ethics committee of Kano State Ministry of Health, Nigeria.

Sample size calculation

The sample size for this study was estimated using the following parameters: F-test, mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA); alpha (α) level of 0.05 (5% chance of drawing a false positive conclusion or committing type I error); power of 0.80 (80% probability of avoiding false negative conclusion; effect size of 0.20 (small effect size was used as no similar RCT could be found); and correlation among repeated measures of 0.5. Based on these assumptions, the total sample size required is 42. However, while accounting for 15% (n = 6) dropout rate, a minimum sample size of 48 participants (24 per group) will be finally required. The sample size calculation was performed with G-Power software version for Windows [58].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, percentage and frequency will be used to summarise the data. Comparison of baseline categorical variables among groups will be conducted using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test and for continuous variables using independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test where applicable. Intention-to-treat principle will be used for the primary statistical analysis by including each participant’s available data in accordance with original allocation and irrespective of the level of attendance. The primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) by including time (4, 8 and 20 weeks, baseline will be the reference), treatment (overground walking with paretic lower limb loading and overground walking without paretic lower limb loading) and a time × treatment interaction as fixed effects, and a random intercept to account for within-subject correlations. Treatment effect will be defined as the adjusted between-group difference and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). We opted to use LMMs because it provides unbiased estimates when data are missing at random [59]. Additionally, per-protocol analysis using the LMMs will be performed as sensitivity analysis by excluding randomised participants who did not received allocated intervention, or who attended fewer than 18 treatment sessions, received proscribed concomitant intervention known to influence gait, and experienced exclusionary medical conditions listed in the study exclusion criteria. All the statistical procedures will be performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) at a probability level of 0.05.

Data management

All participants will be recognised only by their ID codes. Data will be stored in secured manner using paper files and in computer hard drive using Microsoft Excel. Participants’ information will be kept strictly confidential and will be accessed only by members of the trial team or ethics committee. Only anonymised data will be made available to other researchers to enable international prospective analyses. All data values will be double-checked by the outcome assessors for errors and missing values before analysis.

Data monitoring

The study will not have a formal data monitoring committee since the study involves a low-risk intervention. Instead, the authors of this study protocol (identical to trial management committee) will be responsible for monitoring patients’ recruitment, treatment and attrition rates, as well as any other concerns related to the study every 2 weeks.


The results of this study will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed open-access journal irrespective of whether the results are positive, negative or inconclusive.


To our knowledge, no other study in the way of RCT determined the effectiveness of applying additional weight to paretic lower limb during overground walking training on gait ability and motor function compared to overground walking training without paretic lower limb loading among chronic stroke survivors. Individuals with hemiparesis following stroke demonstrate a wide range of spatiotemporal gait abnormalities [25, 26, 60, 61], which in the long run may result in more dependency in basic activities of daily living and consequently reduced quality of life [62]. Improving walking function is therefore the most desired goal of stroke rehabilitation [63] and can be regarded as a yardstick for evaluation [25, 55].

Despite rehabilitation efforts, up to 80% of stroke survivors still experience impaired walking function and further 22% do not regain any walking function [64]. Previous studies [46, 47] found that the addition of weight to paretic lower limb during aquatic walking positively influences spatiotemporal gait parameters of chronic stroke survivors, however, these studies may not be generalised because buoyancy may have influenced some gait outcomes. Another limitation is that they suffered a small sample size with one of them being a non-controlled trial [46]. Moreover, underwater treadmill walking was used for gait training, which may not be readily available and affordable in low-resource settings like Nigerian clinics. This ultimately poses a major challenge, particularly in rural areas where the majority of stroke patients reside [48]. This trial will be therefore conducted to determine the effectiveness of an 8-week, low-cost overground walking with paretic lower limb loading among chronic stroke survivors. Paretic limb loading during overground walking approach could be safe and more accessible as well as affordable compared with aquatic treadmill training.

The present study may further support the evidence of the use of weight loading in gait rehabilitation of stroke patients which may guide clinical practice. A potential limitation of this study is that overground walking, particularly among older patients and those with excess weight, may increase burden on weight-bearing joints and the risk of falls as compared to underwater treadmill walking. Another limitation is that spatiotemporal gait parameters will not be assessed with gold standard instruments such as three-dimensional (3-D) motion capture system, and electronic walkways, such as GAITRite® [65]. Nevertheless, these instruments are quite expensive to acquire and operate and, as such, the use of technically simple and inexpensive methods like ink footprints may be more feasible for clinical use, especially in resource-constrained settings. Furthermore, because the study will be conducted in two centers, there could be a slight difference in how the therapists perform intervention and assessment.

Trial status and amendments

The trial registration number is NCT05097391. The protocol version is 1.3. Recruitment of participants is currently ongoing. Recruitment started in November 2021 and is expected to be completed by February 2023. Any justifiable modifications to this protocol will be communicated to Health and Research Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Kano State, Nigeria, as well as updated in the registry.

Availability of data and materials

There is no plan to provide public access to the data used for this trial. However, data will be made available by the corresponding author upon request.



Active-assisted exercises


Analysis of variance


Body mass index


Muhammadu Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hospital


Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital


Modified Rankin Scale


Randomised controlled trial


Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials


Transient ischemic attack


  1. Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, regional and country-specific burden of ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajsic S, Gothe H, Borba HH, et al. Economic burden of stroke: a systematic review on post-stroke care. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(1):107–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rochmah TN, Rahmawati IT, Dahlui M, et al. Economic burden of stroke disease: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lanas F, Seron P. Facing the stroke burden worldwide. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(3):e235–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorelick PB. The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):417–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21st century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat. 2018;2018:3238165.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Owolabi M, Olowoyo P, Popoola F, et al. The epidemiology of stroke in Africa: a systematic review of existing methods and new approaches. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Owolabi L, Nagoda M. Stroke in developing countries: experience at Kano, Northwestern Nigeria. Sudan J Med Sci. 2012;7(1):9–14.

  9. Desalu OO, Wahab KW, Fawale B, et al. A review of stroke admissions at a tertiary hospital in rural Southwestern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2011;10(2):80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wahab KW, Okubadejo NU, Ojini FI, et al. Predictors of short-term intra-hospital case fatality following first-ever acute ischaemic stroke in Nigerians. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(12):755–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Komolafe MA, Ogunlade O, Komolafe EO. Stroke mortality in a teaching hospital in South Western Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2007;37(3):186–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogun S. Acute stroke mortality at LUTH. Nig J Clin Pract. 2003;5:38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Njoku C, Aduloju A. Stroke in Sokoto, Nigeria: a five year retrospective study. Ann Afr Med. 2004;3(2):73–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Owolabi MO, Akarolo-Anthony S, Akinyemi R, et al. The burden of stroke in Africa: a glance at the present and a glimpse into the future. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015;26(2 Suppl 1):S27–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahab KW. The burden of stroke in Nigeria. Int J Stroke. 2008;3(4):290–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, et al. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984;15(6):1039–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pak S, Patten C. Strengthening to promote functional recovery poststroke: an evidence-based review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(3):177–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Belda-Lois J-M, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Arene N, Hidler J. Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(5):346–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li S, Francisco GE, Zhou P. Post-stroke hemiplegic gait: new perspective and insights. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu J, Wu B. The novel quantitative technique for assessment of gait symmetry using advanced statistical learning algorithm. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:528971.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Fulk G. Physical Rehabilitation. 6th ed. FA Davis; 2013.

  23. Oken O, Yavuzer G, Ergöçen S, et al. Repeatability and variation of quantitative gait data in subgroups of patients with stroke. Gait Posture. 2008;27(3):506–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewek MD, Randall EP. Reliability of spatiotemporal asymmetry during overground walking for individuals following chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(3):116–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, et al. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(2):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang W-Y, Tuan S-H, Li M-H, et al. Immediate effects of a novel walking assist device with auxiliary illuminator on patients after acute strokes. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2019;39(02):115–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Foot placement in a body reference frame during walking and its relationship to hemiparetic walking performance. Clin Biomech. 2010;25(5):483–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson KK, Gage WH, Brooks D, et al. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture. 2010;31(2):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kesikburun S, Yavuz F, Güzelküçük Ü, et al. Effect of ankle foot orthosis on gait parameters and functional ambulation in patients with stroke. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;63(2):143–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Balaban B, Tok F. Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. PM R. 2014;6(7):635–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zamparo P, Francescato MP, De Luca G, et al. The energy cost of level walking in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5(6):348–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Fabio RP, Kurszewski WM, Jorgenson EE, et al. Footlift asymmetry during obstacle avoidance in high-risk elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2088–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jørgensen L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, et al. Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading. Bone. 2000;27(5):701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1677–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(10):1074–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, et al. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What Is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87987.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Whittle MW. Gait Analysis: An Introduction. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang HS, James CR, Atkins LT, et al. Effects of arm weight on gait performance in healthy subjects. Hum Mov Sci. 2018;60:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee SK. The Effect of a vertical load on gluteus medius activity and gait characteristics during walking. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(11):1397–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Donker SF, Mulder T, Nienhuis B, et al. Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking. Exp Brain Res. 2002;146(1):26–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jung D-E, Kim K. The effects of ankle loads on balance ability during one-leg stance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(5):1527–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hwang J-W, Lee S-K, Park J-S, et al. The effects of ankle weight loading on the walking factors of adults without symptoms. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017;13(4):425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lam T, Luttmann K, Houldin A, et al. Treadmill-based locomotor training with leg weights to enhance functional ambulation in people with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33(3):129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jung T, Lee D, Charalambous C, et al. The influence of applying additional weight to the affected leg on gait patterns during aquatic treadmill walking in people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lim C-G. Effect of underwater treadmill gait training with water-jet resistance on balance and gait ability in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Front Neurol. 2020;10:1246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Abba MA, Olaleye OA, Hamzat TK. Effects of over-ground walking and cognitive rehabilitation on cognition, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, participation and quality of life among stroke survivors: a study protocol. Eur J Physiother. 2022;24(3):144–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cleland BT, Perez-Ortiz A, Madhavan S. Walking test procedures influence speed measurements in individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Biomech. 2020;80:105197.

  50. Boenig DD. Evaluation of a clinical method of gait analysis. Phys Ther. 1977;57(7):795–8.

  51. Murray MP, Kory RC, Sepic SB. Walking patterns of normal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;51(11):637–50.

  52. Flansbjer UB, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82.

  53. Youdas JW, Hollman JH, Aalbers MJ, et al. Agreement between the GAITRite walkway system and a stopwatch-footfall count method for measurement of temporal and spatial gait parameters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1648–52.

  54. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(7):576–9.

  55. Badaru U, Alonge V, Adeniyi A, et al. Relative therapeutic efficacy of the treadmill and step bench in gait rehabilitation of hemiparetic stroke patients. Afr J Physiother Rehabil Sci. 2012;4(1-2):45–50.

  56. Wilkinson M, Menz HB, Raspovic AM. The measurement of gait parameters from footprints. Foot. 1995;5:84–90.

  57. Wilkinson MJ, Menz HB. Measurement of gait parameters from footprints: a reliability study. Foot. 1997;7(1):19–23.

  58. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

  59. Twisk JW. Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19(8)769–76.

  60. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, et al. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64(12):583–7.

  61. Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics. Gait  Posture. 1996;4(2):136–48.

  62. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2402–48.

  63. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11(2):181–4.

  64. Algurén B, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Functioning of stroke survivors--A validation of the ICF core set for stroke in Sweden. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(7):551–9.

  65. van Bloemendaal M, Beelen A, Kleissen RFM, et al. Concurrent validity and reliability of a low-cost gait analysis system for assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(6):456–63.

Download references


We would like to thank and acknowledge the heads of physiotherapy departments in the recruiting sites, and all the research assistants for their valuable assistance in the running of the study.


This research received no grant from any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AUM is the principal investigator and conceived the study. AUM and AAI developed the first draft of the protocol. AAI reviewed and edited the protocol. AAI supervised the protocol and proposed the statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the trial design. The authors have read, contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulhamid U. Maje.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maje, A.U., Ibrahim, A.A. Effectiveness of an 8-week overground walking with paretic lower limb loading on spatiotemporal gait parameters and motor function among chronic stroke survivors: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 24, 124 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Gait symmetry
  • Lower limb loading
  • Overground walking
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • Spatiotemporal gait parameters
  • Stroke