Skip to main content

A blended eHealth intervention for insomnia following acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Up to a third of stroke patients and patients with traumatic brain injury suffer from insomnia, including problems to fall asleep or stay asleep at night. Insomnia may exacerbate other brain damage-related problems, for example regarding cognitive functioning and emotional well-being; may lead to poorer quality of life; and may complicate recovery processes. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, delivered face-to-face or online, is found to be effective in the general population. However, despite the high prevalence and serious consequences of insomnia following acquired brain injury, studies on the efficacy of face-to-face cognitive behavioral treatment in this population are scarce, and this applies even more for studies on online cognitive behavioral therapy. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed guided online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia following acquired brain injury.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study (PROBE) will be conducted, in which 48 patients diagnosed with stroke or traumatic brain injury and insomnia will be randomly allocated to the online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia treatment group or the treatment as usual group. The treatment consists of 6 online cognitive behavioral therapy sessions given on a weekly basis and personalized feedback after each session, combined with 2 face-to-face sessions. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention period and at 6-week follow-up. The primary outcome is the insomnia severity assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index. Secondary outcome measures include sleep quality, sleep features derived from the sleep diary, fatigue, anxiety and depression, subjective cognitive functioning, and societal participation.

Discussion

This study will provide insight on the efficacy of online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia following stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register NTR7082. Registered on 12 March 2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

There is increasing awareness that sleep disorders following acquired brain injury are a serious problem and therefore need attention. These sleep disorders include sleep apnea, circadian rhythm disturbances, excessive daytime sleepiness, increased need for sleep, and insomnia [1,2,3]. The latter is most commonly reported. Complaints include trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up early and are accompanied by daytime complaints. Up to a third of stroke patients [4] and patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) [2] meet DSM-IV criteria for insomnia disorder (ID), which is three times more than the 10% of the general population that suffers from ID [5]. Insomnia may exacerbate other brain damage-related problems, for example regarding cognitive functioning and emotional well-being; may lead to poorer quality of life; and may complicate recovery processes [2, 4, 6]. The treatment of insomnia should therefore be an important part of rehabilitation after acquired brain injury.

Numerous randomized controlled trials have shown that cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective treatment for insomnia in otherwise healthy people, as well as in several populations with insomnia comorbid with another disorder [7,8,9]. A problem with implementation of CBT-I on a large scale is the lack of skilled therapists, limiting access to treatment. Online versions of CBT-I have been developed to reach a larger group of patients with insomnia. Recent reviews show that Internet-delivered CBT-I is effective in improving sleep in adults with insomnia [10, 11].

Despite the high prevalence and serious consequences of insomnia in stroke patients or patients with TBI, studies examining CBT-I following acquired brain injury are scarce. To date, CBT-I was examined in two studies concerning stroke patients [12, 13] and five studies concerning patients with mild to severe TBI [14,15,16,17,18]. The CBT-I protocol applied in the studies consisted of four to eight weekly sessions, combining cognitive and behavioral techniques including stimulus control, sleep restriction, cognitive therapy, and sleep hygiene education. CBT-I was adapted to brain injury patients by adding information on factors that could contribute to insomnia specifically after brain injury. CBT-I was administered online in one study [18] and face-to-face in the other six studies. Six out of these seven studies found significant improvement on sleep outcomes [12,13,14, 16,17,18] and four of these studies found significant improvement on secondary outcomes as depression and fatigue [12, 14, 15, 17]. Only three studies were randomized controlled trials, of which two compared CBT-I with treatment as usual [12, 14] and one compared CBT-I with a placebo condition (online education only) [18]. Furthermore, only three out of the seven studies—and none of the randomized controlled trials—formally assessed a diagnosis of ID as inclusion criterion [13, 16, 17]. More randomized controlled trials using formal diagnosis of ID are needed in order to reach a well-founded conclusion on the efficacy of CBT-I in patients with stroke or TBI.

For the present study, we developed an online eHealth CBT-I (eCBT-I) (see Table 1 for more details). Not only is eHealth easier to access and probably more cost-effective, it also has more benefits for patients, such as the opportunity to reread information and the freedom to follow treatment at their own time, place, and pace. The present study will compare eCBT-I with treatment as usual in patients with stroke or TBI to evaluate the added value on top of standard care. Treatment as usual does not address sleep.

Table 1 Overview of online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (eCBT-I)

Objectives

The objectives of this study are:

  1. (1)

    To evaluate the efficacy of eCBT-I in reducing insomnia severity posttreatment and at 6-week follow-up in patients with insomnia following a stroke or TBI, as compared to treatment as usual (TAU)

  2. (2)

    To evaluate the efficacy of the eCBT-I in reducing complaints about fatigue, cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and societal participation posttreatment and at 6-week follow-up compared to TAU

  3. (3)

    To explore whether treatment efficacies vary with severity of insomnia, with the severity and type of brain injury, and with the time since brain injury.

Our primary hypothesis is that eCBT-I will reduce insomnia posttreatment more than treatment as usual, compared to baseline. Our secondary hypotheses are that eCBT-I will improve fatigue, cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and societal participation.

Methods

Study design

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) uses a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study design (PROBE) [19] to compare eCBT-I with TAU. A total of 48 patients will be randomly assigned to the eCBT-I or TAU group. Assessment will be performed at baseline (T1), 1 week after the 6-week intervention period (T2), and after 6-week follow-up (T3). The total duration of participation is 14 weeks. See Fig. 1 for a flowchart.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of study. eCBT-I, online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia; TAU, treatment as usual

Recruitment, randomization, blinding, and treatment allocation

Participants will be recruited from five outpatient rehabilitation centers spread over the Netherlands (Heliomare Rehabilitation at Wijk aan Zee, Reade at Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Friesland at Beetsterzwaag, Basalt Rehabilitation at Delft and The Hague, and Adelante at Hoensbroek). Patients that are eligible based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate. After informed consent is given, participants will complete the baseline measurement. Participants will then be randomly assigned to the eCBT-I or the TAU group. All participants will continue with standard rehabilitation care for various complaints, which do not specifically address insomnia (see Table 2). As complaints differ between persons, interventions differ as well. This care can include psychotherapy aimed at mood or other psychopathology, therapy aimed at cognitive functioning, physiotherapy, fitness, occupational therapy, and social work. The therapy dosage depends on different needs and capacity of participants. The variation in rehabilitation care between participants is expected to be similar for both groups and will be registered at follow-up by their clinicians. The TAU group will only receive standard rehabilitation care and can receive the eCBT-I after the study period. Participants can leave the study at any time for any reason without consequences. In case of withdrawal, participants will be asked to still do the measurements to control for attrition bias and a new patient will be included in accordance with the procedure. The measurements and intervention are not likely to have adverse consequences. Randomization will be done by a research randomizer program (www.randomizer.org) using permuted blocks to balance participants equal to both groups within centers. Treatment assignment is blinded, as researcher assistants, clinicians, and participants are unaware of number of included participants per center and not informed of this randomization procedure. Treatment allocation is not blinded for therapist and participant, as the nature of cognitive behavioral therapy does not permit blinding, but will be concealed until participants are recruited and baseline measurements are finished. Outcome assessment is self-reported and therefore not blinded for participant, but potential assessment bias of clinician or data collector on outcomes is excluded. Data collector is blinded for treatment allocation as well. Research assistant responsible for data input is blinded. See Table 3 for an overview of all measurements.

Table 2 Overview of treatment as usual (TAU)
Table 3 Assessment measures and time-points

Eligibility criteria

Participants are eligible for inclusion if diagnosed with stroke or TBI and insomnia disorder according to DSM-5 criteria. Furthermore, they should be aged 18 or older and capable of using the Internet. Exclusion criteria are untreated sleep apnea, current or expected treatment with a main focus on fatigue or sleep during the study, unstable medication regiments, use of medication with insomnia as side effect, alcohol or drug abuse, and a major untreated or unstable medical or psychiatric condition. Users of sleep medication will be encouraged to finish medication before enrolment or to keep intake stable during the study period. Depending on type and dosage of medication, the physician will determine the period needed to exclude the influence of finishing sleep-related medication on the outcome measures.

Intervention

The eCBT-I comprises six guided weekly sessions provided online, combined with two face-to-face sessions of 60 min and a smartphone diary-app for daily reporting of sleep times and subjective sleep quality. Each session is structured around one topic and contains specific information, assignments and testimonials of two patients with insomnia after brain injury to illustrate sleep problems and homework assignments. All participants will receive online personal feedback after each session and will be encouraged to practice daily with the provided exercises, downloadable within the eHealth intervention on a daily basis. Participants can start with the next session after they have read their personal feedback. They can contact their therapist at any time by means of the integrated email function. Participants will be encouraged to complete the diary every day by their therapist.

The eCBT-I is based on well-established CBT-I components and includes behavioral and cognitive techniques. These techniques contain sleep hygiene education, stimulus control, sleep restriction, cognitive restructuring, activation, relaxation, and fatigue and stress management. The eCBT-I has been adjusted to people with acquired brain injury in general, both with respect to content and the way of conveying information. Content adjustments include specific education about the nature and treatment of insomnia after acquired brain injury, testimonials of patients with insomnia following acquired brain injury, and adaptations to cognitive impairments due to brain damage. Information is given in clear and short texts and is visually supported. An option is included to allow for listening to an audio version of the texts. All sessions follow the same structure, with repetition of key points. Specific feedback suggestions for each session will be provided for the therapists.

The length of our eCBT-I protocol of 6 weeks is comparable with eCBT-I protocols in other studies. The CBT-I protocol in other studies examining efficacy in ABI consisted of 4 to 8 weekly sessions [12,13,14,15,16,17], and 6 weeks for eCBT-I [18]. In a review on the efficacy of eCBTI in the general population, an average length of 5.5 weeks was found, with a range of 2–9 weeks [11].

The eCBT-I will be given by an experienced registered healthcare psychologist, trained in using the eHealth intervention. Adherence will be monitored by checking frequency of registration in the sleep diary app, time spent online, and online assignments done. For a detailed description of the intervention per week, see Table 1.

Outcomes

Sleep outcome measures

The primary outcome measure is the change in insomnia severity measured with the Dutch version of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at posttreatment. The ISI consists of 7 items and uses a 5-point scale to measure to which extent participants experience insomnia. The total score ranges from 0 (no insomnia) to 28 (severe insomnia). A cut-off of 10 is used to indicate clinical levels of insomnia in this study, similar to other studies [20,21,22]. The Minimally Clinical Improvement Difference (MCID), which indicates the minimal improvement to be clinically significant, is a reduction of six points [23]. The internal consistency is adequate (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.74–0.78). The ISI is selected as it is sensitive to treatment response [22, 24] and used in comparable research worldwide, including the Netherlands [20, 21]. Secondary sleep outcome measures include overall sleep disturbances assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [25] and the following sleep features derived from the sleep diary app: total sleep time, sleep onset latency, number of nocturnal awakenings, sleep efficiency, and subjective sleep quality.

Other outcome measures

Secondary outcome measures cover fatigue, anxiety and depression, subjective cognitive functioning, and societal participation. Fatigue after acquired brain injury will be assessed with the Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale (DMFS). The DMFS measures 5 aspects of fatigue: impact of fatigue, mental fatigue, signs and direct consequences of fatigue, physical fatigue, and coping with fatigue. All subscales of the DMFS showed sufficient to good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.70 to 0.91), good convergent validity with an existing fatigue scale, and good divergent validity with measures of mood and self-esteem [26]. Anxiety and depression symptoms will be assessed with the Dutch version of the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The reliability of the HADS is good (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.71 to 0.90) as is the test-retest reliability (0.86–0.90) [27]. Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) is a measure of subjective cognitive functioning. Internal consistency is good (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88) as is the test-retest reliability (0.83) [28]. The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation—Participation (USER-Participation) is a questionnaire to rate objective and subjective participation after rehabilitation. Internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.70–0.91), and test-retest reliability is 0.65 for the frequency scale, 0.85 for the restrictions scale, and 0.84 for the satisfaction scale [29, 30].

Other study parameters

Demographical, injury-related, and clinical variables which may influence the treatment effect will be registered: age, gender, diagnosis, time since injury, insomnia duration, use of prescribed sleep medication, use of other medication, comorbid psychiatric and somatic disorders, educational level, and currently being employed. Possible presence of sleep apnea will be screened with the Stop-Bang questionnaire [31] in participants that have not been evaluated for its presence with the gold standard overnight polysomnography [32].

Sample size calculation

Calculation of power and group size in a repeated measures design requires an estimate of the expected intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, within subject correlation). We therefore resorted to a recent randomized trial of Dekker and colleagues (2020) on the effect of eCBT-I on ISI in people with insomnia. We used this intraclass correlation coefficient as indication of follow-up of ISI assessments across 6 weeks in our study population with acquired brain injury. That study reported an ICC of 0.54 for ISI assessments repeated across 6 weeks in 175 people suffering from insomnia without brain injury [33]. Calculation of power and group size moreover requires an estimate of the expected treatment effect size. Whereas treatment effects of eCBT-I are often reported to be of moderate to large size, we preferred to be somewhat conservative and expect a somewhat smaller than moderate effect in the population of TBI and stroke and therefore used f = 0.20. Calculation of the required sample size using G*Power [34] for ANOVA, with two repeated measures and ICC of 0.54, indicated that 48 completers would provide (2 × 24), at a significance of alpha = 0.05, sufficient power (1-beta = 0.80) for a minimal detectable time-by-group interaction effect of f = 0.20 (small to moderate).

Statistical analyses

Data analysis will be performed with SPSS 23 (IBM; Armonck, USA). Means and standard deviations of the demographic and injury-related variables and the clinical characteristics collected at baseline will be calculated. As normality assumptions may not be met with this small sample size, data distributions and all model assumptions will be checked for all analyses. If model assumptions are not met, data will either be transformed or analyzed using a non-parametric test, as appropriate. For data not normally distributed, median and interquartile range will be reported. Independent T tests will be used to check for an imbalance between groups. Nominal variables will be checked with χ2 tests and ordinal variable with the Mann-Whitney Test. Statistical significance will be set at a p value of 0.05. To accommodate likely occasional missing days, the repeated measures obtained by diaries will be analyzed with mixed effect models. The treatment effects will be examined using a repeated-measures ANOVA. In the case of significant baseline imbalance, post hoc analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used on the change scores of the outcome measures with baseline scores as covariates. Intention-to-treat analyses will be conducted and presented as primary results. Additionally, a per-protocol analysis will be performed. Also, we will compare the eCBT-I and TAU group with regard to the percentage of participants who have improved (reduction ≥ 6 points on the ISI) and recovered (ISI < 10). We will use mixed effect regression models to explore whether treatment efficacy, i.e., the time-by-treatment effect, is modified by time since brain injury and by diagnosis (stroke versus TBI).

Discussion

To date, there are three randomized controlled trials with small samples evaluating the effects of CBT-I for people with acquired brain injury [12, 14, 18]. Taken together, number of treated participants in the CBT-I studies was 34 patients with a stroke or TBI. Considering this scarcity, more research is needed as we concluded in our recent review on this topic [35]. This study is designed primarily to evaluate the effect of eCBT-I following stroke and traumatic brain injury and therefore expected to provide insight on effects on sleep, fatigue, subjective cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and societal participation. It uses an online intervention that can be disseminated at low cost to professionals when found effective. Also, this study will explore who will benefit from treatment. Strength of this study is the assessment of ID according to DSM-5 criteria; the inclusion of information on severity of brain injury and common comorbid factors, such as sleep apnea; and the use of secondary outcome measures for cognitive functioning, emotional wellbeing, fatigue, and societal participation. As a result, this study is expected to strengthen the body of evidence of effectiveness of CBT-I for people with acquired brain injury and provide clinicians with evidence to help formulate future guidelines for the treatment of insomnia following stroke and TBI.

There are several limitations to this study that should be noted. In contrast to earlier research, we will combine stroke and TBI patients in our study, as insomnia complaints are comparable for those diagnoses. Moreover, other symptoms like cognitive and emotional consequences of the brain injury are similar as well. Our hypothesis is that eCBT-I will be similar effective for stroke and TBI patients. Combining both diagnoses may increase inclusion rate and therefore shorten study period. If effective, the eCBT-I will be earlier accessible in time for those who need it. A potential limitation of this study is that differential effects between types of brain injury will be missed. This will be explored with mixed effect regression models. A second potential limitation is that we asses sleep only by subjective sleep measurements, as insomnia symptoms are our primary focus of interest. It would be interesting to use objective measures of sleep as is recommended as a standard research assessment of insomnia [36]. However, we chose not to do this, as we expected this to be an additional burden on the participant that could negatively impact treatment adherence and increase drop-out. At last, participants in both groups will have the benefits of personal attention and standard rehabilitation care tailored to their needs. However, placebo and nocebo effects cannot be completely excluded, as participants are aware of treatment assignment and expectation may influence outcome.

Trial status

Protocol version 2, September 19, 2017. Recruitment started in January 2018 and is expected to be completed in September 2020. The final participants are expected to complete their assessments at the end of 2020.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ABI:

Acquired brain injury

CBT-I:

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

eCBT-I:

Online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

ID:

Insomnia disorder

ISI:

Insomnia Severity Index

TAU:

Treatment as usual

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

References

  1. 1.

    Barshikar S, Bell KR. Sleep disturbance after TBI. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17(11):87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ouellet MC, Beaulieu-Bonneau S, Morin CM. Sleep-wake disturbances after traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(7):746–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hermann DM, Bassetti CL. Sleep-related breathing and sleep-wake disturbances in ischemic stroke. Neurol. 2009;73(16):1313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leppavuori A, Pohjasvaara T, Vataja R, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T. Insomnia in ischemic stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;14(2):90–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev. 2002;6(2):97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Duss SB, Seiler A, Schmidt MH, Pace M, Adamantidis A, Müri RM, Bassetti CL. The role of sleep in recovery following ischemic stroke: a review of human and animal data. Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms. 2017;2:94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Trauer JM, Qian MY, Doyle JS, Rajaratnam SM, Cunnington D. Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(3):191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Johnson JA, Rash JA, Campbell TS, Savard J, Gehrman PR, Perlis M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in cancer survivors. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;27:20–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Taylor DJ, Pruiksma KE. Cognitive and behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in psychiatric populations: a systematic review. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(2):205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Seyffert M, Lagisetty P, Landgraf J, Chopra V, Pfeiffer PN, Conte ML, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy to treat insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zachariae R, Lyby MS, Ritterband LM, O'Toole MS. Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia–a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;30:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nguyen S, Wong D, McKay A, Rajaratnam SM, Spitz G, Williams G, Ponsford JL. Cognitive behavioural therapy for post-stroke fatigue and sleep disturbance: a pilot randomised controlled trial with blind assessment. Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019;29(5):723–38.

  13. 13.

    Herron K, Farquharson L, Wroe A, Sterr A. Development and evaluation of a cognitive behavioural intervention for chronic post-stroke insomnia. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2018;46(6):641–60.

  14. 14.

    Nguyen S, McKay A, Wong D, Rajaratnam SM, Spitz G, Williams G, et al. Cognitive behavior therapy to treat sleep disturbance and fatigue after traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1508–17 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lu W, Krellman JW, Dijkers MP. Can cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia also treat fatigue, pain, and mood symptoms in individuals with traumatic brain injury? - A multiple case report. Neurorehabilitation. 2016;38(1):59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ouellet MC, Morin CM. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia associated with traumatic brain injury: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1298–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ouellet MC, Morin CM. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia associated with traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1581–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Dudley M, Vincent N, Feigin V. A pilot randomized controlled trial of on-line interventions to improve sleep quality in adults after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(5):619–29.

  19. 19.

    Hansson L, Hedner T, Dahlöf B. Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Blood Press. 1992;1(2):113–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lancee J, Van Straten A, Morina N, Kaldo V, Kamphuis JH. Guided online or face-to-face cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia: a randomized wait-list controlled trial. Sleep. 2016;39(1):183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lancee J, Eisma MC, van Straten A, Kamphuis JH. Sleep-related safety behaviors and dysfunctional beliefs mediate the efficacy of online CBT for insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(5):406–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011;34(5):601–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yang M, Morin CM, Schaefer K, Wallenstein GV. Interpreting score differences in the Insomnia Severity Index: using health-related outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(10):2487–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Visser-Keizer AC, Hogenkamp A, Westerhof-Evers HJ, Egberink IJ, Spikman JM. Dutch multifactor fatigue scale: a new scale to measure the different aspects of fatigue after acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(6):1056–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Spinhoven PH, Ormel J, Sloekers PPA, Kempen GIJM, Speckens AEM, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27(2):363–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ponds RWHM, Van Boxtel M, Jolles J. De ‘Cognitive Failure Questionnaire’ als maat voor subjectief cognitief functioneren. Tijdschrift voor neuropsychologie. 2006;1(2):37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, Van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VP, Visser-Meily J, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(8):752–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Post MW, Van der Zee CH, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser-Meily JM, Van Berlekom SB. Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(6):478–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chung F, Subramanyam R, Liao P, Sasaki E, Shapiro C, Sun Y. High STOP-Bang score indicates a high probability of obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(5):768–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ, Friedman N, Malhotra A, Patil SP, et al. Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009;5:263–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dekker K, Benjamins JS, Maksimovic T, Filardi M, Hofman WF, Van Straten A, et al. Combined internet-based cognitive-behavioral and chronobiological intervention for insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503570 IF 13.122.

  34. 34.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2007;41:1149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ford ME, Groet E, Daams JG, Geurtsen GJ, Van Bennekom CA, Van Someren EJ. Non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia following acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;50:101255.

  36. 36.

    Buysse D, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006;29(9):1155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors and was instead funded from the internal research and education department of Heliomare Rehabilitation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MF conceived the idea of this study and coordinates the study under supervision of EG, GG, CVB, and EVS. EG, GG, and CVB contributed to the design of this study. MF and CVB are involved in patient recruitment. MF was the primary author for this manuscript, and GG helped draft the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marthe E. Ford.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol, information brochure, questionnaires, and informed consent have received ethics approval from the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (AMC), protocol 2017-223. Central ethical approval at both central and local level has been confirmed from the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (ref approval no. 2017-223), and we will not begin recruiting at other centers in the trial until local ethical approval has been obtained. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants. Study results will lead to public disclosure but cannot be traced back to the individual patients who took part in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ford, M.E., Geurtsen, G.J., Groet, E. et al. A blended eHealth intervention for insomnia following acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 21, 861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04789-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Insomnia
  • Sleep
  • Acquired brain injury
  • Stroke
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Online treatment
  • eHealth