- Study protocol
- Open Access
Efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent correction compared with slow continuous correction with hypertonic saline in patients with moderately severe or severe symptomatic hyponatremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SALSA trial)
Trials volume 18, Article number: 147 (2017)
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte imbalance encountered in clinical practice, associated with increased mortality and length of hospital stay. However, no high-quality evidence regarding whether hypertonic saline is best administered as a continuous infusion or a bolus injection has been found to date. Therefore, in the current study, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent correction compared with slow continuous correction with hypertonic saline in patients with moderately severe or severe symptomatic hyponatremia.
This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study with two experimental therapy groups. A total of 178 patients with severe symptomatic hyponatremia will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either rapid intermittent bolus or slow continuous infusion management with hypertonic saline. The primary outcome is the incidence of overcorrection at any given period over 2 days. The secondary outcomes will include the efficacy and safety of two other approaches to the treatment of hyponatremia with 3% hypertonic saline.
This is the first clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent correction compared with slow continuous correction with hypertonic saline in patients with moderately severe or severe hyponatremia.
ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier number: NCT02887469. Registered on 1 August 2016.
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte imbalance encountered in clinical practice, and is associated with increased mortality and length of hospital stay . The symptoms related to hyponatremia span a broad range from moderately severe (cognitive test abnormalities, gait impairment) to severe or life-threatening (hypoxemia, coma, and epilepsy) [2,3,4,5]. Treatment strategies for hyponatremia differ according to the severity of clinical symptoms and duration of hyponatremia . The extent and rate of increase in serum sodium (sNa) levels during treatment are crucial. Overcorrection of chronic hyponatremia may result in osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS), whereas undercorrection may be insufficient to prevent its life-threatening manifestations [6,7,8,9].
Several methods for continuous infusion of hypertonic saline have been used to guide the rate of fluid administration to achieve the required sNa target [10, 11]. The increase in sNa should be limited to 8–10 mmol/L within the first 24 h and 18 mmol/L within 48 h [11, 12]. As these methods were based on static models of a dynamic clinical situation, they had a bias toward overcorrection of hyponatremia [1,14,, 13–15].
Recent guidelines have recommended prompt infusion of 100–150 mL of 3% saline over 10–20 min to increase the sNa by 4–6 mmol/L during the first hour. A pragmatic approach to treatment with hypertonic fluid is to use small, fixed boluses to achieve controlled incremental increases in sNa [1,14,15,16,, 13–17]. However, this recommendation was the result of small randomized trials , case reports with small numbers of patients [14, 19], and expert opinion [20,21,22,23]. No high-quality evidence has been reported regarding whether hypertonic saline is best administered as a continuous infusion (preferred by most) or as a rapid intermittent bolus injection. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent correction compared with slow continuous correction with hypertonic saline in patients with symptomatic severe hyponatremia. Furthermore, the study will examine prevailing conceptions regarding the optimal treatment of severe symptomatic hyponatremia.
The use of intermittent bolus therapy with 3% sodium chloride will prevent and/or ameliorate ODS in patients with hyponatremia treated with hypertonic saline. Compared to the use of standard slow continuous infusion with 3% hypertonic saline, the incidence of overcorrection will be lower in patients with moderately severe or severe hyponatremia.
This study is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study with two experimental therapy groups. We have followed the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement which defines standard protocol items for clinical trials  (see Additional file 1). The study algorithm is depicted in Fig. 1 and the SPIRIT and study schedule are given in Figs. 2 and 3. After enrollment, clinical follow-up will be performed 2 days after treatment with 3% hypertonic saline.
Study participants and measurements
All participants will be selected from among patients visiting the emergency rooms of two general hospitals in Korea (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center). Patients aged over 18 years who have moderately severe to severe symptoms and glucose-corrected sNa  ≤125 mmol/L on the first blood test will be screened for study participation. Moderate symptoms include nausea, headache, drowsiness, general weakness, and malaise [1, 26, 27]. Severe symptoms include vomiting, stupor, seizure, and coma (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)).
The following assessments will be performed during the initial emergency room encounter: (1) completion of questionnaire on medical and drug history including the use of antihypertensive medication, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antiepileptic drugs, steroids, and synthyroid, (2) physical examination of all body systems, (3) measurement of height and weight, (4) blood pressure and pulse rate measurement, and (5) assessment of psychological status. Participants, who meet all of the inclusion criteria, do not require exclusion on the basis of the exclusion criteria, and provide written informed consent will be eligible for this study (Table 1).
Serum creatinine (SCr) will be measured using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry-traceable method with a Toshiba TBA 200FR Analyzer (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) will be calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD EPI) equation .
A research coordinator will perform the randomization. A list of random numbers will be generated by an independent statistician. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either the slow continuous correction group or the rapid intermittent correction group in accordance with the predefined randomization list with a block size of 2. Randomization will be stratified based on the symptom severity related to hyponatremia (moderately severe or severe).
Physician’s practical treatment guidelines according to the sNa level
The principal purpose of this study will be to compare the rapid intermittent correction group to the slow continuous correction group . According to a review of the medical literature on the treatment of hyponatremia, treatment with hypertonic (3%) saline is recommended in cases of severe symptomatic hyponatremia [1, 15, 16]. Therefore, the rate of infusion of 3% saline will be stratified based on the symptom severity in each group. After randomization, the participants will undergo either rapid intermittent correction or slow continuous correction of hyponatremia for 48 h. Treatment in the intermittent bolus group will comply with European guidelines published in 2014, and the slow continuous infusion will be guided by widely accepted methods [1,14,15,, 13–16]. The treatment goals are to raise the sNa level by 5–9 mmol/L from the initial sNa and to achieve symptom relief within the first 24 h, and to raise the sNa level by 10–17 mmol/L from the initial sNa or ≤130 mmol/L, and to achieve symptom relief during the 48 h [10,11,12]. We will also check for overcorrection at every sample time point and conduct relowering treatment. Relowering treatment is performed as below if the achieved sNa level is ≥10 mmol/L at any sample time point within the first 24 h or the achieved sNa level is ≥18 mmol/L at any sample time point within 48 h [1,14,15,, 13–16]. The treatment goal, relowering treatment strategy, and cause-specific treatment of hyponatremia will be applied to each group equally.
Rapid intermittent bolus group (Fig. 4a)
First 24 hours
In the case of moderately severe symptoms, the use of intravenous infusion of 2 mL/kg 3% hypertonic saline over 20 min (100 mL, 3% saline for unknown body weight) is recommended. In cases of severe symptoms, it is recommended to perform intravenous infusion of 4 mL/kg 3% hypertonic saline over 40 min (200 mL, 3% saline for unknown body weight). After the initial treatment, repeated infusion of 2 mL/kg 3% hypertonic saline over 20 min at every sample time point (at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) until the observation of a sNa level increase of 5–9 mmol/L from the initial sNa and symptom relief is recommended.
From 24 to 48 hours
In both moderately severe and severe cases of hyponatremia, repeated infusion of 2 mL/kg 3% hypertonic saline over 20 min at every sample time point (at 30, 36, 42, and 48 h) is recommended until the sNa level increases to 10–17 mmol/L from the initial sNa or until the sNa reaches 130 mmol/L, and until the symptoms improve.
Slow continuous correction group (Fig. 4b)
First 24 hours
In the case of moderately severe symptoms, it is recommended to infuse 3% hypertonic saline at a rate of 0.5 mL/kg/h (25 mL/h, 3% saline for unknown body weight). In cases of severe symptoms, it is recommended to begin an infusion of 3% hypertonic saline at a rate of 1 mL/kg/h (50 mL/h, 3% saline for unknown body weight). After the initial treatment, the infusion protocol will be modified as below according to the sNa level at every sample time point (at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h). If the sNa level increases to 5–9 mmol/L above the initial sNa level, accompanied by symptom relief, the 3% saline infusion should be discontinued regardless of changes in the sNa level. If the sNa level increases at a rate of under 0.5 mmol/h or 3 mmol/6 h, it is recommended to add 3% hypertonic saline infusion at a rate of 0.25 mL/kg/h to the previous infusion rate or to restart the infusion at 0.5 mL/kg/h if it was previously discontinued. If the sNa level demonstrates increases of over 0.5 mmol/h or 3 mmol/6 h, the rate of 3% hypertonic saline infusion should be maintained.
From 24 to 48 hours
The infusion protocol will be modified as below according to the sNa levels at every sample time point (at 30, 36, 42, and 48 h). If the Na level increases to 10–17 mmol/L above the initial sNa level or sNa reaches 130 mmol/L, and symptom relief is observed, the 3% hypertonic saline infusion should be discontinued regardless of changes in the sNa level during the previous 6 h. If the Na level increase is less than 1.5 mmol/6 h, it is recommended to add 3% hypertonic saline infusion at a rate of 0.25 mL/kg/h to the previous infusion rate or to restart the infusion at a rate of 0.25 mL/kg/h if it was previously discontinued. If sNa levels increase at a rate of over 1.5 mmol/6 h, the 3% saline infusion rate should be maintained.
The primary outcome is the incidence of overcorrection, a surrogate marker of ODS, at any given period, defined as follows: increase in sNa level by >12 mmol/L within the first 24 h or increase in sNa level by >18 mmol/L within 48 h. The secondary outcomes will include efficacy and safety; changes in symptoms between pretreatment and 24 and 48 h after treatment with 3% hypertonic saline; time from treatment initiation to an increase in sNa ≥5 mmol/L; time from treatment initiation to the achievement of a sNa >130 mmol/L; incidence of target correction rate, defined as an achieved sNa <10 mmol/L within 24 h and a sNa <18 mmol/L within 48 h; length of hospital stay; incidence of additional treatment; incidence of ODS confirmed by the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); incidence of relowering treatment; and change in GCS score between pretreatment and 24 and 48 h after 3% hypertonic saline treatment.
Clinical and laboratory evaluations
The physical examination, laboratory evaluations, and medication reviews will be conducted before treatment; the laboratory evaluations will include a complete blood count, serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphorous, protein, albumin, and glucose; a liver function test; a thyroid function test (TFT); rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test (basal cortisol, ACTH, cortisol at 30 min and 60 min), serum osmolality; urinalysis, urine electrolytes, urine osmolality. sNa levels will be measured every 6 h for 2 days . The GCS score will be assessed before treatment and at 24 and 48 h of treatment. All types and volumes of administered fluid during 48 h will be monitored.
All adverse events related to overcorrection will be recorded and followed up during the study period or until resolution during treatment with 3% hypertonic saline. Any serious adverse events will be reported to investigators and the Ethics Committee. We will check for overcorrection at every sample time point and conduct relowering treatment as needed. Relowering treatment is performed as follows if the achieved sNa level is ≥10 mmol/L at any sample time point within the first 24 h or if the achieved sNa level is ≥18 mmol/L at any sample time point within 48 h: discontinuing ongoing active treatment; initiating infusion of 10 mL/kg of 5% dextrose over 1 h; and/or adding desmopressin 2 mcg .
Sample size calculation
In the medical literature, ODS is a critically important outcome, but the incidence of ODS is very low [1, 15, 31]. Therefore, as a surrogate marker of ODS, the rate of overcorrection >12 mmol/L within 24 h or >18 mmol/L within 48 h was calculated for the primary study outcome. A previous study reported that the overcorrection rate was 10–16% with slow continuous correction of hyponatremia . However, there was insufficient information for estimating the rate of overcorrection with intermittent bolus infusion. Based on clinical practice and experience, we estimated that the overcorrection rate was 32% with slow continuous correction during a recent 1-year period. We therefore expect that the rate of overcorrection will be 5% in patients treated with rapid intermittent correction and the rate of overcorrection with slow continuous correction could be as high as 20%. We calculated the required sample size for an estimated dropout rate of 15%, a two-sided level of significance of α = 5%, a power of 80%, and found that 89 participants will be required in each group to find a significant difference using a χ 2 test. A total of 178 participants will be included in the analysis. We have considered one interim analysis at the time that a half of subjects complete the study. The O’Brien-Fleming’s alpha spending function will be used to test the first interim and final analysis of primary outcome.
Statistical analyses will be performed on both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to treat (ITT) bases. For the PP analysis, all participants who completed the study will be included to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes. For the ITT analysis, all participants who were enrolled and randomized to one of the two groups will be included. The baseline characteristics and laboratory data will be presented as means and standard deviations for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables.
The incidence of overcorrection, ODS, relowering treatment, and target correction rate (achieved sNa <10 mmol/L within the first 24 h and sNa <18 mmol/L within 48 h) will be compared between the two groups using a χ 2 test and Fisher’s exact test. In interim analysis, if the P value < 0.003 then we would stop the study early for significance of outcome. If not, we would recruit another half of subjects. The differences in changes in symptoms and GCS scores between pretreatment and 24 and 48 h, time to reach target sNa, time to achieved sNa ≥5 mmol/L for the first time, and length of hospital stay will be analyzed using Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All analyses will be performed using SPSS Statistics software V21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
Data and safety monitoring
The paper data collection sheets and signed informed consents will be stored in a locked cabinet, and the electronic data base will be stored on password-protected secure severs. Any unanticipated adverse events that occur during the study will be reported to the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the procedures of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea. For any revised study procedure, the modification will be submitted to the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Institutional Review Board for approval and to ClinicalTrials.gov. The data will be kept confidential with only limited access to research investigators.
Recently published guidelines recommended the prompt infusion of small, fixed boluses of hypertonic saline in patients with symptomatic hyponatremia [1, 15, 16]. This regimen leads to abrupt incremental increases in sNa levels and improvement of hyponatremia-related symptoms [1, 15, 16]. However, safety issues regarding rapid correction with hypertonic saline have not been evaluated. No large-scale randomized controlled trials to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of rapid and slow correction with hypertonic saline have been performed. This is the first clinical trial to provide physicians with quality evidence regarding treatment with hypertonic saline in patients with moderately severe or severe hyponatremia. In addition, a protocolized approach, such as that of this study, may be extended to the management of other electrolyte disorders.
In the development of this protocol, we complied with recent guidelines, particularly in determining the target sNa levels, in the method of infusion of 3% hypertonic saline for the rapid correction group, and in the classification of symptoms of hyponatremia [1, 15, 16]. Recently published guidelines recommended prompt intravenous infusion of 100–150 mL 3% hypertonic saline over 10–20 min, repeated once or twice as needed, in the initial treatment of severe hyponatremia [1, 15, 16]. We adopted a weight-based approach (2 mL/kg) rather than the fixed 100–150-mL infusion volumes of 3% hypertonic saline in this study because Koreans tend to have smaller physiques than Westerners. Recent guidelines recommended discontinuing the infusion of hypertonic saline in cases of improvement of symptoms after a 5-mmol/L increase in sNa and initiating a diagnosis-specific treatment . Our planned approach to decreases or no change in sNa levels during the diagnosis of hyponatremia and the initiation of cause specific treatment was to repeat a bolus infusion every 6 h until sNa incrementally increases to the target level and symptom relief were observed. This approach is different from the protocols recommended by recent guidelines . In the slow continuous correction group, we adopted a 3% hypertonic saline infusion rate of 0.5–1 mL/kg/h, a widely known treatment approach [10, 11], according to symptom severity. Recent guidelines define indicative symptoms of cerebral edema as severe or moderate symptoms that can be attributed to hyponatremia . In our study, general weakness and malaise, usually considered nonspecific, were included as moderate symptoms of hyponatremia. Our rationale for including these as symptoms of hyponatremia are as follows: first, patients start complaining of nausea and malaise as sNa concentration falls acutely below 125 mmol/L . Malaise is thus a result of hyponatremia and is as significant as nausea. Second, patients with symptomatic hyponatremia, including weakness and malaise, should be treated with hypertonic saline . As this clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of rapid versus slow hypertonic saline administration in the correction of hyponatremia, we included general weakness and malaise as hyponatremia-defining symptoms.
A previous study reported that the overcorrection rate was 10–16% in slow continuous correction of hyponatremia . According to unpublished retrospective data in our hospital, overcorrection in the slow continuous correction group occurred in approximately 32% out of 129 hyponatremic patients during a recent 1-year period. Although Moritz et al. reported that there is little or no risk of inadvertent overcorrection , data on the rapid intermittent correction regimen were unavailable. We therefore expect that the overcorrection rate will be 5% in patients treated with rapid intermittent correction, and the overcorrection rate in slow continuous correction could be as high as 20%. For this reason, we will plan to perform an interim analysis, which will be conducted after a number of patients equal to half the estimated total sample size have been enrolled. No previous studies addressing differences in efficacy between rapid intermittent correction groups and slow continuous correction groups in each stratification group have been reported. In the interim analysis, we will also examine the ratio of stratification (moderately severe versus severe) for each experimental therapy group and analyze the efficacy of rapid intermittent correction compared to slow continuous correction for each level of stratification. After the interim analysis, the total study population of 178 patients will be adjusted to the ratio of stratification in the experimental therapy groups. In the interim analysis, if the P value < 0.003 then we will stop the study early for significance of outcome. If not, we will recruit another half of subjects.
We will also include the participants with chronic hyponatremia. It is well-known that using a threshold of 48 h is frequently applied to distinguish “acute” from “chronic” hyponatremia . Because not all patients have sNa measured within 48 h prior to visiting the emergency room. Therefore, it is practically impossible to exclude the patients with chronic hyponatremia based on these definitions. Second, the most important factor in determining treatment of hyponatremia is the presence of symptoms, irrespective of biochemical degree or timing (acute versus chronic) of hyponatremia . We will enroll the patients with moderately severe to severe symptoms who need to be treated. In other words, even if the patients belong to the chronic hyponatremia group, the patients with symptomatic hyponatremia need to be treated. Therefore, we thought that including the patients with chronic hyponatremia is reasonable and inevitable.
We will use the overcorrection rate as a primary outcome. ODS is a serious complication, which should be prevented for patient safety, and it is one of the critical outcomes in the management of hyponatremia, but it is difficult to diagnose and very uncommon [1, 31]. Several studies have reported that the rate of overcorrection is strongly correlated with ODS, and is highly sensitive for predicting ODS. In terms of safety issues, the overcorrection rate might be a good laboratory outcome in our trial [1, 15, 32, 33].
This trial may have some limitations. We will enroll patients who visit the emergency room in general hospitals; therefore, patients with hospital-acquired hyponatremia will be excluded. Second, various situations may affect protocol violations, considering that on-duty physicians and nurses may work in shifts. For this, reason we made both protocols as simple as possible.
In summary, the SALSA study is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the clinical usefulness of rapid intermittent correction management in patients with moderately severe or severe hyponatremia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rapid bolus correction compared with slow continuous correction of hyponatremia.
This trial started recruiting in August 2016. Recruitment is expected to conclude by July 2018.
Rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone
- CKD EPI:
Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology
Estimated glomerular filtration
Glasgow Coma Scale
International Classification of Diseases
Magnetic resonance imaging
Osmotic demyelination syndrome
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials
Thyroid function test
Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(3):G1–G47.
Decaux G. Is asymptomatic hyponatremia really asymptomatic? Am J Med. 2006;119(7 Suppl 1):S79–82.
Knochel JP. Hypoxia is the cause of brain damage in hyponatremia. JAMA. 1999;281(24):2342–3.
Kokko JP. Symptomatic hyponatremia with hypoxia is a medical emergency. Kidney Int. 2006;69(8):1291–3.
Fujisawa H, Sugimura Y, Takagi H, Mizoguchi H, Takeuchi H, Izumida H, et al. Chronic hyponatremia causes neurologic and psychologic impairments. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(3):766–80.
Tzamaloukas AH, Malhotra D, Rosen BH, Raj DS, Murata GH, Shapiro JI. Principles of management of severe hyponatremia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(1):e005199.
Berl T. Treating hyponatremia: damned if we do and damned if we don’t. Kidney Int. 1990;37(3):1006–18.
Sterns RH, Riggs JE, Schochet Jr SS. Osmotic demyelination syndrome following correction of hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(24):1535–42.
Verbalis JG, Martinez AJ. Neurological and neuropathological sequelae of correction of chronic hyponatremia. Kidney Int. 1991;39(6):1274–82.
Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(6):1110–7.
Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(21):1581–9.
Ayus JC, Krothapalli RK, Arieff AI. Treatment of symptomatic hyponatremia and its relation to brain damage. A prospective study. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(19):1190–5.
Hsu YJ, Chiu JS, Lu KC, Chau T, Lin SH. Biochemical and etiological characteristics of acute hyponatremia in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2005;29(4):369–74.
Worthley LI, Thomas PD. Treatment of hyponatraemic seizures with intravenous 29.2% saline. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6514):168–70.
Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Korzelius C, Schrier RW, Sterns RH, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–S42.
Ball SG, Iqbal Z. Diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;30(2):161–73.
Sterns RH, Nigwekar SU, Hix JK. The treatment of hyponatremia. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29(3):282–99.
Rogers IR, Hook G, Stuempfle KJ, Hoffman MD, Hew-Butler T. An intervention study of oral versus intravenous hypertonic saline administration in ultramarathon runners with exercise-associated hyponatremia: a preliminary randomized trial. Clin J Sport Med. 2011;21(3):200–3.
Ayus JC, Arieff A, Moritz ML. Hyponatremia in marathon runners. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):427–8. author reply 427-428.
Moritz ML, Ayus JC. 100 cc 3% sodium chloride bolus: a novel treatment for hyponatremic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis. 2010;25(1):91–6.
Moritz ML, Ayus JC. New aspects in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of hyponatremic encephalopathy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(7):1225–38.
Hew-Butler T, Ayus JC, Kipps C, Maughan RJ, Mettler S, Meeuwisse WH, et al. Statement of the Second International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, New Zealand, 2007. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(2):111–21.
Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Hospital-acquired hyponatremia—why are hypotonic parenteral fluids still being used? Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007;3(7):374–82.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.
Hillier TA, Abbott RD, Barrett EJ. Hyponatremia: evaluating the correction factor for hyperglycemia. Am J Med. 1999;106(4):399–403.
Moritz ML, Ayus JC. The pathophysiology and treatment of hyponatraemic encephalopathy: an update. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18(12):2486–91.
Rose BD, PT. Clinical physiology of acid-base and electrolyte disorders. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro 3rd AF, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.
Ellison DH, Berl T. Clinical practice. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(20):2064–72.
Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4(8):1522–30.
Cluitmans FH, Meinders AE. Management of severe hyponatremia: rapid or slow correction? Am J Med. 1990;88(2):161–6.
Pirzada NA, Ali II. Central pontine myelinolysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76(5):559–62.
Dellabarca C, Servilla KS, Hart B, Murata GH, Tzamaloukas AH. Osmotic myelinolysis following chronic hyponatremia corrected at an overall rate consistent with current recommendations. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):171–3.
The trial is funded by National Research foundation of Korea (2016R1C1B1015687). The sponsor of this study had no role in the study design, data collection, data review, data analysis, or report writing.
Availability of data and materials
AL and SK drafted the manuscript. YHJ, KK, SA, YKO, HL, JS, SK, HJC, KYN, and JBL participated in the design of the study and the data collection. SHB participated in the design of the study, drafted the manuscript, conceived the study, and participated in acquiring funding. SHB and SK had final responsibility for the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final submitted manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, as amended by the 64th World Medical Association General Assembly in 2013. All participants will provide signed, written, informed consent stating that participation is voluntary and can be withdrawn at any time. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1605/346-003) and Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (16-2016-113). The trial protocol has been registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02887469).
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, A., Jo, Y.H., Kim, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent correction compared with slow continuous correction with hypertonic saline in patients with moderately severe or severe symptomatic hyponatremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SALSA trial). Trials 18, 147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1865-z
- Hypertonic saline
- Osmotic demyelination syndrome