Skip to main content
Download PDF

Update on the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke and baseline features of the 3035 patients recruited

Trials volume 12, Article number: 252 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is approved in Europe for use in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who meet strictly defined criteria. IST-3 sought to improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke, and to determine whether a wider range of patients might benefit.

Design

International, multi-centre, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial of intravenous rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke. Suitable patients had to be assessed and able to start treatment within 6 hours of developing symptoms, and brain imaging must have excluded intracranial haemorrhage and stroke mimics.

Results

The initial pilot phase was double blind and then, on 01/08/2003, changed to an open design. Recruitment began on 05/05/2000 and closed on 31/07/2011, by which time 3035 patients had been included, only 61 (2%) of whom met the criteria for the 2003 European approval for thrombolysis. 1617 patients were aged over 80 years at trial entry. The analysis plan will be finalised, without reference to the unblinded data, and published before the trial data are unblinded in early 2012. The main trial results will be presented at the European Stroke Conference in Lisbon in May 2012 with the aim to publish simultaneously in a peer-reviewed journal. The trial result will be presented in the context of an updated Cochrane systematic review. We also intend to include the trial data in an individual patient data meta-analysis of all the relevant randomised trials.

Conclusion

The data from the trial will: improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of iv rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke; provide: new evidence on the balance of risk and benefit of intravenous rtPA among types of patients who do not clearly meet the terms of the current EU approval; and, provide the first large-scale randomised evidence on effects in patients over 80, an age group which had largely been excluded from previous acute stroke trials.

Trial registration

ISRCTN25765518

Peer Review reports

Progress with the study and modifications to the design

Planning for the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) began in 1998. At its outset in 2000, the trial was planned as a pragmatic trial which sought to improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke and to determine whether a wider variety of patients than previously thought might benefit from this treatment. After the drug was approved for use in Europe in 2003, the flexible trial eligibility criteria enabled us to continue recruiting patients who did not clearly meet all the criteria set out in the provisional European licence for the drug. With these changes and the need to comply with the increasingly burdensome requirements of research regulation in Europe, some aspects of the trial protocol and its practical procedures have inevitably had to change over the 12 year course of the study. The initial pilot phase of the study, funded by the UK Stroke Association, had a double-blind design, for which Boehringer Ingelheim provided a supply of drug and matching placebo. However, Boehringer Ingelheim did not wish to provide further drug supplies for the expansion phase, funded by The UK Health Foundation, and hence the design of this phase of the study was modified. With appropriate ethical approval, the expansion phase was designed as a prospective, randomised, open blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial and the first patient was recruited in this phase on 1st August 2003. The main phase of the trial was awarded funding by the UK Medical Research Council and began on 1st April 2005. The protocol for the MRC phase of the trial was published in Trials[1].. At each stage, relevant amendments were made to the protocol, and consolidated in an updated protocol (version 1.93) which was approved by appropriate authorities and published on the trial website http://www.ist3.com (additional data file 1). When advanced imaging techniques became more widely available in the participating centres, the study group developed a nested imaging study evaluating the role of CT and MR perfusion and angiography (CTP/CTA/MRP/MRA) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. The cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis is being investigated in a sub-study in the Scandinavian region cohort.

Sample size/recruitment target

In our 2004 application to the MRC for funding of the main phase of the trial we stated: 'Assuming the same event rate as observed in the feasibility phases, the trial could very reliably detect an absolute difference of 10% in the proportion of patients dead or dependent at 6 months after treatment. With a sample size of 6000 patients, the trial would have > 99.9% power to detect such a difference (alpha = 0.001) and sufficient power to permit reliable analyses of the pre-specified subgroups. A trial of this size could detect a smaller, but still clinically worthwhile net benefit of as little as a 3% absolute difference in the primary outcome (80% power, at alpha = 0.05).' The application to the MRC for funding was successful, but by the time the grant was activated, two major changes to research regulation came into force: the European Clinical Trials Directive, the UK Clinical Trials Regulations 2004, and, shortly afterwards, the UK Research Governance Framework. These changes led to a large increase in the time taken to recruit and activate new centres and hence significantly reduced the rate of increase in patient recruitment. By 2007, it was clear that the various factors that had delayed recruitment meant that the original target of 6000 was no longer feasible, and we applied for approval to amend the recruitment target and for additional funding to extend the period of recruitment to mid 2011. These changes were summarised in version 1.93 of the protocol (additional document 1) as follows: "If 3500 patients were recruited, the trial could detect a 4% absolute difference in the primary outcome. A sample size of 1000 patients could detect a 7% absolute difference in the primary outcome, which is consistent with the effect size among patients randomised within 3 hours of stroke in the Cochrane review. Amendment in the light of recruitment by 2007: . The Medical Research Council... awarded an extension to funding to permit recruitment to continue until mid 2011, with a revised recruitment target of 3100 which would yield 80% power to detect an absolute difference of 4.7% in the primary outcome.'

Recruitment

The pilot (double blind) phase of the trial began when the first patient was randomised on 5th May 2000; sixteen centres enrolled patients. Recruitment continued without interruption into the open expansion phase (first patient in this phase was randomised on 1st August 2003). In April 2005, recruitment continued with the start of the MRC funded main phase. The independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) met regularly throughout the trial, in strict confidence, to review the accumulating trial data and any other relevant external data. Their terms of reference were set out in the protocol, and in the light of the evidence available, the DMC did not recommend any change to the protocol or to recruitment into the study. The trial closed to recruitment on 31st July 2011, with a total of 3035 patients from 156 hospitals in 12 countries (Table 1).

Table 1 Recruitment: number of centres and patients in each country
Full size table

Eligibility

The eligibility criteria are set out in full in the protocol, but can be summarised in terms of the 'uncertainty principle'[2–4]. As this was a pragmatic trial, conducted in the ';real world'[5], in order to ensure a wide variety of patients were included, inclusion and exclusion criteria were kept simple [6]. Patients were eligible if: they had symptoms and signs of clinically definite acute stroke; the time of stroke onset was known; treatment could be started within six hours of this onset; and, CT or MRI brain scanning had reliably excluded both intracranial haemorrhage and structural brain lesions which could mimic stroke (e.g cerebral tumour). In addition, if the patient had a clear indication for intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA, they were to be treated in accordance with local guidelines. Equally, if the patient had a clear contraindication to treatment they were not to be entered in the trial. Only if both the clinician and the patient (or a relevant proxy for the patient) felt that the treatment was 'promising but unproven', could the patient be included in the trial after appropriate informed consent. In order to comply with local regulatory and ethical requirements, the form of the consent procedure applied varied somewhat between countries and between centres within each country. Details of the type of consent process applied will be reported separately.

Baseline data collection and method of treatment allocation

After informed consent had been obtained, the clinician used either a voice-activated telephone or a secure web-based randomisation system to enter a patient in the study. The systems recorded and checked the baseline characteristics of the patients and allocated the treatment only after all baseline data had been entered and passed range and consistency checks. We used a minimisation program to achieve optimum balance for key prognostic factors (see Table 2a), and from January 2006, the minimisation algorithm was additionally stratified by world region and minimised on everything else within world region. Because simple minimisation within centres can lead to alternation of treatment allocation and thus potential loss of allocation concealment, our system also incorporated a degree of random allocation. Patients were allocated to the treatment group that would minimise the difference between the groups with a probability of 0.80. For 244 patients in the initial phase of the trial, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) was not measured directly, but was retrospectively estimated by an algorithm (derived from subsequent patients in the trial based on baseline clinical characteristics). In the initial double-blind phase, the clinician was informed of the treatment allocation in the form of a treatment pack number (which might contain active drug or matching placebo). In the open phase, the investigator was informed of the patient's treatment allocation (either thrombolysis with 0.9 mg/kg i.v. rtPA or control). In both phases, the randomisation system informed the local clinician of the dose (of drug or placebo in the double blind phase, or of the drug dose amongst those allocated thrombolysis in the open phase) to be given as a bolus and as infusion, and the patient's unique trial ID number.

Table 2a Clinical characteristics at randomisation used in the minimisation algorithm
Full size table

Baseline characteristics of patients

The characteristics of the patients recorded at baseline are shown, for both treatment groups combined, in Tables 2a and 3 (2b). Patients recruited within 1-2 hours of onset were statistically significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to have a more severe neurological deficit than those recruited at later time points after onset (Figure 1). Similarly, patients recruited at earlier time points were statistically significantly older than those recruited later (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2). Additionally, the proportion of patients with a visible ischaemic lesion on the baseline imaging rose with time (data not shown).

Table 2b Clinical characteristics at randomisation not used in minimisation algorithm, and recorded at randomisation
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

Baseline stroke severity as assessed by NIHSS among patients randomised at different times after stroke onset. Plot displays median and interquartile range. p value for linear regression on exact time since onset p < 0.0001.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Age among patients randomised at different times after stroke onset. Plot displays median and interquartile range. p value for linear regression on exact time since onset p < 0.0001.

Full size image

Baseline characteristics of the patients in the context of the prevailing evidence

The baseline characteristics of the patients recruited into the study changed over the course of the study as clinician's uncertainties about which types of patients should be treated changed. These changes arose from appreciation of the accumulating evidence from randomised controlled trials and consequent changes in the European Licence and clinical guidelines. At the start of the trial in 2000, rtPA was approved for use in the USA and Canada, but was not approved for use in Europe. In 2003, the European Medicines Agency granted provisional approval for the use of rtPA for patients aged less than 80 years who could be treated within three hours (and who also met a number of other criteria). In 2008, when the ECASS-3 study reported evidence of benefit for treatment between 3-4.5 hours [7], guidelines in various European countries suggested that patients aged less than 80 years could benefit even if treated within 3-4.5 hours. We estimated the number of patients in the trial that would have met either the original 2003 approval criteria or the anticipated new 2011 criteria (modified in the light of the ECASS-3 data). If we defined 'meeting the 2003 approval' as: age < 80, delay from onset to randomisation < 3 hoyrs, NIHSS 6 - 25, SBP < = 185, DBP < = 110, 2.7 < = glucose < = 22 and no history of the combination of prior stroke and diabetes mellitus, 61 patients (2%) met the criteria, and if all the same criteria were applied and the time window was extended to 4.5 hours, 350 (12.7%) met the criteria. This clearly demonstrates that the great majority of the patients in IST-3 fall outside the European approval criteria for rtPA., and hence the study will provide valuable new randomised information in many categories of patient - as well the elderly - who are currently not eligible for treatment.

Development of the statistical analysis plan

The statistical analysis plan is being finalised at present, without reference to the unblinded data, and will be published before the code is broken in early 2012. It will take account of external evidence on factors influencing prognosis and response to treatment, the baseline characteristics of patients entering the study and advances in statistical methodology [8, 9]. The SAP will define a small number of 'primary' subgroup analyses, and a larger number of exploratory secondary analyses [8]. During the course of the trial, a number of novel approaches to the analysis of ordered functional outcome data in clinical trials of stroke treatment have been suggested to improve statistical power Statistical tests, which make use of the ordered nature of outcome data, such as ordinal logistic regression and 'shift analysis', may give more reliable results [9]. However, the technique is not universally applicable and it is important that key underlying assumptions are met for the analyses to be valid [10]. The Trial Steering Committee sought statistical advice, and because the underlying assumptions would not necessarily be met in the IST3 dataset, decided an ordinal analysis was not appropriate for the primary analysis of outcome. This decision was also consistent with all the previous trials of intravenous rtPA, none of which had adopted an ordinal approach for the primary analysis. However, an ordinal analysis has been included as one of the secondary exploratory analyses. The trends in Figures 1 & 2 demonstrate that the statistical analysis plan will also need to take account of these potentially confounding effects on the assessment of treatment effects overall and in subgroups.

Reporting of results by allocated treatment

The trial will be unblinded in early 2012 and the main trial results presented at the European Stroke Conference in Lisbon in May 2012 with the aim of publishing simultaneously in a peer-reviewed journal. The trial primary results will be presented in the context of an updated Cochrane systematic review of all the relevant randomised trials. The imaging sub-study CTP/CTA/MRP/MRA results are due in early 2013. An individual patient data meta-analysis of all trials testing intravenous rtPA, including IST-3, is also being considered.

Discussion

With 3035 patients, IST-3 is the largest ever randomised trial of intravenous thrombolysis for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (the two largest previous trials each recruited exactly 800 patients [7, 11]. At its outset in 2000, the trial sought to improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke and to determine whether a wider variety of patients than previously thought might benefit from this treatment. With the approval of the treatment for specific types of patients, the trial was able to evaluate the effects of treatment in patients who did not precisely meet the existing European approval for the treatment; in other words, also sought to extend the criteria for treatment. At the start of the trial, when rtPA had not yet received approval from the European regulatory authorities, patients of all ages were recruited within 3 hours. After the provisional approval for the use of rtPA in Europe in 2003 for those patients aged less than 80 years who could be treated within three hours, participating clinicians generally opted to treat patients who met the conditions of the licence, and hence only recruited only those patients in IST3 that did not strictly meet the licence criteria. The elderly have been under-represented in trials of treatments for acute stroke [12], especially thrombolysis with rtPA, where fewer than 100 patients aged over 80 years have been included in randomised trials of this treatment [13]. IST-3 has included 1617 patients aged over 80, so will provide valuable randomised evidence on the balance of risk and benefit in this much under-researched, but increasingly important age-group [12]. IST3 has shown that pragmatic trial designs with broad and flexible entry criteria can recruit large numbers of patients, even in the face of changing and burdensome regulatory regimes; the emergence of new data from other relevant trials and rapidly changing clinical practice.

Abbreviations

APPT:

Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

ATLANTIS:

Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke

BASC:

Blood Pressure in Acute Stroke Collaboration

BP:

Blood pressure

CT:

Computed Tomography

CTA:

CT angiography

CTP:

CT perfusion

DICOM:

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine standard

DMC:

Data Monitoring Committee

DWI:

Diffusion Weighted Imaging

ECASS:

European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study

EPITHET:

Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial

HU:

Hounsfield Units

ICH:

International Committee for Harmonisation

ISH:

International Society for Hypertension

IST-3:

Third International Stroke Trial

JPEG:

Joint Photographic Experts Group

MR:

Magnetic Resonance

MRA:

MR angiography

MRP:

MR perfusion

MRC:

Medical Research Council

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NIHSS:

National Institute of Health Stroke Score

NINDS:

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

PT:

Prothrombin Time

OR:

Odds Ratio

PROBE:

Prospective randomised open blinded endpoint design

rtPA:

recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

SUSAR:

Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction

TSC:

Trial Steering Committee.

References

  1. 1.

    Sandercock P, Lindley R, Wardlaw J, Dennis M, Lewis S, Venables G, Kobayashi A, Czlonkowska A, Berge E, Slot K, Murray V, Peeters A, Hankey G, Matz K, Brainin M, Ricci S, Celani M, Righetti E, Cantisani T, Gubitz G, Phillips S, Arauz A, Prasad K, Correia M, Lyrer P, the IST: The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Trials. 2008, 9 (1): 37-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Warlow C, D'Hooghe M, Joos F, Lanckneus M, Lecluyse A, Marchau M, Rocher A, Roussel J, Van ZM, Dereume J, Hildebrand J, Ceusters W, De RJ, De RJ, Decoo D, Derom D, Vakaet A, Carton H, Nevelsteen A: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991, 337: 1235-43. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Peto R, Baigent C: Trials: the next 50 years. BMJ. 1998, 317 (7167): 1170-1. 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1170.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Collins R, MacMahon S: Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9253): 373-80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03651-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ware JH, Hamel MB: Pragmatic Trials - Guides to Better Patient Care?. NEJM. 2011, 364 (18): 1685-7. 10.1056/NEJMp1103502.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McMahon AD: Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials. Statistics in Medicine. 2002, 21 (10): 1365-1376. 10.1002/sim.1120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D, the E, I: Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008, 359 (13): 1317-29. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kent DM, Rothwell PM, Ioannidis JP, Altman DG, Hayward RA: Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal. Trials. 2010, 11: 85-10.1186/1745-6215-11-85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bath PM, Gray LJ, Collier T, Pocock S, Carpenter J: Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials. Stroke. 2007, 38 (6): 1911-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saver JL: Novel End Point Analytic Techniques and Interpreting Shifts Across the Entire Range of Outcome Scales in Acute Stroke Trials. Stroke. 2007, 38 (11): 3055-62. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis SM, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P, the Second European-Australasian Acute SS, I: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet. 1998, 352: 1245-51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sanossian N, Ovbiagele B: Prevention and management of stroke in very elderly patients. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8 (11): 1031-41. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70259-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ: Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD000213-4

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Konig IR, Ziegler A, Bluhmki E, Hacke W, Bath PMW, Sacco RL, Diener HC, Weimar C, on behalf of the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) Investigators: Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Simple Index Works in Patients From Controlled Clinical Trials. Stroke. 2008, 39 (6): 1821-6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The IST-3 collaborative group wishes chiefly to acknowledge the support of all the patients who participated in the study, and the many individuals not specifically mentioned in the paper who have supported the study. IST-3 is an investigator led trial. The University of Edinburgh and the Lothian Health Board are co-sponsors. The start-up phase was supported by a grant from the Stroke Association, UK. The expansion phase was funded by The Health Foundation UK. The main phase of the trial is funded by: UK MRC and managed by NIHR on behalf of the MRC-NIHR partnership, The Research Council of Norway, AFA Insurances (Sweden), the Swedish Heart Lung Fund, The Foundation of Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg, Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institute Joint ALF-project grants (Sweden), the Government of Poland, the Australian Heart Foundation, Australian NHMRC, the National Heart Foundation Australia, the Swiss National Research Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, Foundation for health and cardio-/neurovascular research, Basel, Switzerland and the Assessorato alla Sanita, Regione dell'Umbria. Drug and placebo for the 300 patients in the double-blind component of the start-up phase were supplied by Boehringer-Ingelheim GMBh. IST-3 acknowledges the extensive support of the NIHR Stroke Research Network, NHS Research Scotland (NRS), through the Scottish Stroke Research Network, and the National Institute for Social Care and Health Research Clinical Research Centre (NISCHR CRC). The imaging work was undertaken at the Brain Imaging Research Centre http://www.bric.ed.ac.uk, a member of the SINAPSE collaboration http://www.sinapse.ac.uk, at the Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh. SINAPSE is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive (CSO). Additional support was received from Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland, Desacc, University of Edinburgh, Danderyd Hospital R&D Department, Karolinska Institutet, the Dalhousie University Internal Medicine Research Fund. The study was designed, conducted, analysed and reported independently of all of the sponsors and funding agencies.

Trial Steering Committee

Independent Chairman, Professor Colin Baigent (university of Oxford), Professor David Chadwick, (Former Chairman, Retired)): University of Liverpool; Independent members: Dr Pippa Tyrrell (Manchester University), Professor Gordon Lowe (Glasgow University); Co-principal Investigators: Professor Peter Sandercock (Edinburgh University); Professor Richard Lindley (Professor of Geriatric Medicine, University of Sydney); Chief Investigator for Neuroradiology: Professor Joanna Wardlaw (Edinburgh University) Statistician: Geoff Cohen; Trial Manager: Ms Karen Innes. Heather Goodare: lay representative

CT reading panel

Joanna Wardlaw, Andrew Farrall, Rüdiger von Kummer, Lesley Cala, Anders von Heijne, Zoe Morris, Alessandro Adami, Andre Peeters, Gillian Potter, Nick Brady.

Data Monitoring Committee

Professor Rory Collins, Oxford University, UK (Chairman), Professor Philip Bath (Nottingham University), Professor Jan van Gijn (former member, now retired) (University of Utrecht, The Netherlands), Professor Richard Gray (University of Oxford), Professor Robert Hart (McMaster University, Canada), Professor Salim Yusuf (McMaster University, Canada).

Event Adjudication Committee

Keith Muir, Peter Sandercock, Richard Lindley

National Co-ordinators and Associate National Co-ordinators

Australia: Richard Lindley, Graeme J. Hankey. Austria: Karl Matz, Michael Brainin. Belgium: Andre Peeters. Canada: Gord Gubitz, Stephen Phillips. Italy: Stefano Ricci. Mexico: Antonio Arauz. Norway: Eivind Berge, Karsten Bruins Slot. Poland: Anna Czlonkowska, Adam Kobayashi. Portugal: Manuel Correia. Switzerland: Phillippe Lyrer. Sweden: Veronica Murray, Andreas Terent, Bo Norrving, Per Wester: UK: Graham Venables

Trial Coordinating Centre, Edinburgh

Karen Innes, Alison Clark, David Perry, Vera Soosay, David Buchanan, Sheila Grant, Eleni Sakka, Jonathan Drever, Pauli Hanley, Indee Herath, Ann Leigh Brown, Paul Chmielnik, Christopher Armit, Andrea Walton, Mischa Hautvast, Steff Lewis, Graeme Heron, Sylvia Odusanya, Pam Linksted, Ingrid Kane, Will Whiteley, Robin Sellar, Philip White, Peter Keston, Andrew Farrell, Zoe Morris, Hector Miranda. National Co-ordinating centres: Italy(up to September 2008) Maria Grazia Celani, Enrico Righetti (after September 2008) Silvia Cenciarelli, Tatiana Mazzoli Central Follow up for Italy: Teresa Anna Cantisani. Poland Jan Bembenek Sweden Eva Isaakson. Norway Eivind Berge, Karsten Bruins Slot.

Centres and countries

The list of participating centres and the collaborators at each site are listed in additional file 2.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The IST-3 Co-ordinating Centre, Neurosciences Trial Unit, Western General Hospital, Bramwell Dott Building, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK

    Peter Sandercock, Joanna Wardlaw, Martin Dennis, Karen Innes, Geoff Cohen, Will Whiteley, David Perry, Vera Soosay & David Buchanan

  2. Discipline of Medicine, Sydney Medical School - Westmead and The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Richard Lindley

  3. Neurology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK

    Graham Venables

  4. 2nd Department of Neurology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Sobieskiego Str. 9, 02- 957 Warsaw and Krakowskie Przedmiescie Str. 26/28, 00-927, Warsaw, Poland

    Anna Czlonkowska & Adam Kobayashi

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Kirkeveien 166, NO-0407, Oslo, Norway

    Eivind Berge & Karsten Bruins Slot

  6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, SE-182 88, Stockholm, Sweden

    Veronica Murray

  7. Service de neurologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Andre Peeters

  8. Department of Neurology, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street, GPO Box X2213, Perth, Western Australia, 6001, Australia

    Graeme J Hankey

  9. Neurologische Abteilung, Landesklinikum Donauregion Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria

    Karl Matz & Michael Brainin

  10. UO Neurologia, ASL 1, Ospedale, Via Engels, 06012, Citta' di Castello, PG, Italy

    Stefano Ricci

  11. S C di Neurofisiopatologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di, Perugia, Italy

    Teresa A Cantisani

  12. Division of Neurology, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax Infirmary, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7, Canada

    Gordon Gubitz & Stephen J Phillips

  13. Instituto Nacional de Neurologia, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, 14269, Mexico, DF, Mexico

    Arauz Antonio

  14. Neurology Department, Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4050, Porto, Portugal

    Manuel Correia

  15. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland

    Phillippe Lyrer

  16. Stroke Unit, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 5BE, UK

    Ingrid Kane

  17. Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, Uppsala University Hospital, Ing 85, 2 tr, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden

    Erik Lundstrom

Authors
  1. Peter Sandercock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Lindley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanna Wardlaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Dennis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen Innes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geoff Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Will Whiteley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vera Soosay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. David Buchanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Graham Venables
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Anna Czlonkowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Adam Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Eivind Berge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Karsten Bruins Slot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Veronica Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Andre Peeters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Graeme J Hankey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Karl Matz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Michael Brainin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Stefano Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Teresa A Cantisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Gordon Gubitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Stephen J Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Arauz Antonio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Manuel Correia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Phillippe Lyrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Ingrid Kane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Erik Lundstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the IST-3 collaborative group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sandercock.

Additional information

Competing interests

Peter Sandercock

Has received lecture fees (paid to the Department) and travel expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim for occasional lectures given at international conferences. He was a member of the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) of the RELY trial funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and received attendance fees and travel expenses for attending DSMB meetings (paid to the Department). He is not a member of the Speaker's Panel of any company.

Richard Lindley

Has received payment in his role as conference Scientific Committee member and for occasional lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim. He has attended national stroke meetings organised and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Joanna Wardlaw

Reimbursement for reading CT scans for ECASS III from Boehringer Ingelheim; funding to department. Is the contact reviewer for the Cochrane systematic reviews of thrombolytic treatment for acute stroke. Is director of the Brain Research Imaging Centre for Scotland. This is located within the Department of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Edinburgh. The Centre houses a research magnetic resonance scanner which was funded by the UK Research Councils Joint Research Equipment Initiative, supplemented by grants and donations from various other sources including Novartis, Schering, GE and BI. These commercial sources contributed to the purchase of the scanner, but not the running costs or any individual studies. Has attended meetings held by Boehringer Ingelheim during the licencing of rtPA. She attended as an unpaid independent external adviser but was refunded her travel expenses and the time away from work. Has attended and spoken at national and international stroke meetings organised and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim for which she received honoraria and travel expenses. She is not on any speaker panels or panels of experts nor does she have any paid consultancies with pharmaceutical or imaging manufacturing companies.

Karsten Bruins Slot

Received an honorarium for a lecture from Boehringer Ingelheim and had costs for participating in scientific meetings reimbursed.

Gord Gubitz

Received honoraria and speaker fees from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi Synthlabo Aventis, Hoffman La Roche and Novo Nordisk.

Veronica Murray

Received an unrestricted educational grant for a meeting on thrombolysis in stroke at which IST-3 was discussed.

Graeme J. Hankey

No disclosures relating to thrombolysis.

Eivind Berge

Has received honoraria for lectures at meetings arranged by Boehringer Ingelheim, and reimbursement for costs for attending these meetings.

Authors' contributions

PS, RIL, JW, MD, KI designed the study and wrote the protocol, KI is the study coordinator, GC is the study statistician who prepared the analyses for this paper, DP, VS, DB and JW designed and built the computer software systems for image reading and trial data and image management. PS, RIL, MD, WW, GV, AC, AK, EB, KBS, VM, AP, GH, KM, MB, SR, GG, SP, AA, MC, PL, IK, EL recruited patients to the study, GV, AC, AK, EB, KBS, VM, AP, GH, KM, MB, SR, GG, SP, AA, MC, PL acted as National Coordinators, TC performed all the blinded follow-ups in Italy, WW assisted with follow-up of selected cases in the UK. PS drafted the manuscript and all authors commented on drafts and approved the final version

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandercock, P., Lindley, R., Wardlaw, J. et al. Update on the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke and baseline features of the 3035 patients recruited. Trials 12, 252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-252

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute Ischaemic Stroke
  • Additional Data File
  • Pragmatic Trial
  • Data Monitoring Committee
  • Statistical Analysis Plan

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215