Skip to main content
Download PDF

Community-based management of arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors by lay village health workers for people with controlled and uncontrolled blood pressure in rural Lesotho: joint protocol for two cluster-randomized trials within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL aHT Twic 1 and ComBaCaL aHT TwiC 2)

Trials volume 25, Article number: 365 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Arterial hypertension (aHT) is a major cause for premature morbidity and mortality. Control rates remain poor, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Task-shifting to lay village health workers (VHWs) and the use of digital clinical decision support systems may help to overcome the current aHT care cascade gaps. However, evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive VHW-led aHT care models, in which VHWs provide antihypertensive drug treatment and manage cardiovascular risk factors is scarce.

Methods

Using the trials within the cohort (TwiCs) design, we are assessing the effectiveness of VHW-led aHT and cardiovascular risk management in two 1:1 cluster-randomized trials nested within the Community-Based chronic disease Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) cohort study (NCT05596773). The ComBaCaL cohort study is maintained by trained VHWs and includes the consenting inhabitants of 103 randomly selected villages in rural Lesotho. After community-based aHT screening, adult, non-pregnant ComBaCaL cohort participants with uncontrolled aHT (blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mmHg) are enrolled in the aHT TwiC 1 and those with controlled aHT (BP < 140/90 mmHg) in the aHT TwiC 2. In intervention villages, VHWs offer lifestyle counseling, basic guideline-directed antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet treatment supported by a tablet-based decision support application to eligible participants. In control villages, participants are referred to a health facility for therapeutic management. The primary endpoint for both TwiCs is the proportion of participants with controlled BP levels (< 140/90 mmHg) 12 months after enrolment. We hypothesize that the intervention is superior regarding BP control rates in participants with uncontrolled BP (aHT TwiC 1) and non-inferior in participants with controlled BP at baseline (aHT TwiC 2).

Discussion

The TwiCs were launched on September 08, 2023. On May 20, 2024, 697 and 750 participants were enrolled in TwiC 1 and TwiC 2. To our knowledge, these TwiCs are the first trials to assess task-shifting of aHT care to VHWs at the community level, including the prescription of basic antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet medication in Africa. The ComBaCaL cohort and nested TwiCs are operating within the routine VHW program and countries with similar community health worker programs may benefit from the findings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684055. Registered on January 04, 2023.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Globally, arterial hypertension (aHT) is the single most important risk factor for premature mortality, accounting for 10.8 million or almost 20% of all deaths in 2019 [1, 2]. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate and growing share of the burden of aHT, while many high-income countries have managed to reduce the burden of aHT substantially over the past decades [1, 3,4,5]. Besides changes in demography and lifestyle, insufficient preventive and therapeutic health system responses are the main drivers for the disproportionally high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in LMICs. This results in massive treatment gaps, with less than 20% of people living with aHT in LMICs reaching treatment targets [6,7,8]. Through improved access to antihypertensive medication alone, about 40 million deaths could be prevented over the next 25 years [9]. The involvement of VHWs may be an effective and sustainable approach to enhance access to aHT care and VHW-delivered aHT screening, monitoring, education, and lifestyle counseling has been assessed in various settings with positive effects on awareness, treatment adherence, cardiovascular risk, and blood pressure (BP) control rates [10,11,12,13]. However, compared to community-based interventions by healthcare professionals, the effect of community-based VHW-led interventions on BP reduction was modest, probably because most of the VHW-led interventions did not include pharmacological treatment components [13].

Digital clinical decision support systems (CDSS) [14,15,16,17] and simple, evidence-based treatment protocols using antihypertensive single-pill combinations (SPCs) are promising facilitators for a sustainable task-shifting of more comprehensive services to lay VHWs [18, 19]. However, it remains unclear how the use of CDSSs and antihypertensive SPCs can be included safely and effectively in community-based VHW-led aHT care, complementing the screening, counseling, and referral services for which benefit has already been shown [20, 21].

We assess the effectiveness of a VHW-led, CDSS-assisted aHT care model in rural Lesotho in two cluster-randomized trials nested within the ComBaCaL (Community-Based chronic disease Care Lesotho) cohort study (NCT05596773). The ComBaCaL cohort is maintained by local, trained, and supervised VHWs and is a platform for the investigation of chronic diseases and their management in rural Lesotho. The intervention described here has been developed based on a local non-communicable diseases prevalence survey and burden assessment [22, 23], a scoping literature review [24], multiple workshops with different stakeholders in Lesotho and the ComBaCaL pilot cohort study.

Methods

Setting

The ComBaCaL cohort study is conducted in 103 randomly selected villages in the two rural districts, Butha-Buthe and Mokhothlong, in Lesotho, a small, landlocked country surrounded by South Africa. In each ComBaCaL village, a VHW was elected by the inhabitants according to the procedures outlined in the Lesotho Ministry of Health Village Health Program policy [25]. VHWs play an important role in the Lesotho healthcare system by linking the community to facility-based health services. They are effectively contributing to the control of HIV/AIDS, especially in remote rural areas [25,26,27]. Lesotho is a typical example of an African LMIC where a developing health system is facing the double burden of still highly prevalent infectious diseases (HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis) in combination with a rapidly growing non-communicable disease epidemic [23, 28,29,30].

Design and hypothesis

We are conducting two 1:1 cluster-randomized, open-label trials nested within the ComBaCaL cohort study following the trials within the cohort (TwiCs) design [31, 32]. The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines were used to develop and report this protocol [33]. The two TwiCs (aHT TwiC 1 and aHT TwiC 2) use the same cluster-randomization and the same intervention is applied. However, they test different primary hypotheses in distinct populations. The design and flow of events of the two TwiCs are presented in Fig. 1, using the Cluster Timeline Tool [34].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of the ComBaCaL cohort and aHT TwiCs 1 and 2 using the Cluster Timeline Tool [34]

Full size image

Primary hypothesis/estimand aHT TwiC 1

Offering community-based, VHW-led, CDSS-assisted aHT care in rural Lesotho is superior regarding BP control rates (proportion of participants reaching the treatment target < 140/90 mmHg) 12 months after enrollment compared to offering facility-based aHT care among non-pregnant adults with uncontrolled aHT (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) who did not experience a traumatic death and did not become pregnant irrespective of the uptake of the intervention, aHT treatment adherence, and adverse events.

Primary hypothesis/estimand aHT TwiC 2

Offering community-based, VHW-led, CDSS-assisted aHT care in rural Lesotho is non-inferior regarding BP control rates 12 months after enrollment compared to offering facility-based aHT care among non-pregnant adults with controlled aHT (BP < 140/90 mmHg) who did not experience a traumatic death and did not become pregnant irrespective of the uptake of the intervention, aHT treatment adherence and adverse events.

Eligibility and consent procedure

Participants for both TwiCs are recruited among the ComBaCaL cohort population, which includes all consenting inhabitants of the randomly selected ComBaCaL villages. Following the TwiCs design [31, 32], no additional written consent for the TwiCs is asked as the ComBaCaL cohort consent includes consent to being randomized for nested TwiCs assessing low-risk interventions. The participant information materials and the consent forms of the ComBaCaL cohort study (covering the nested TwiCs) are available from the corresponding author on request and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05596773). As per cohort procedures (outlined in the ComBaCaL cohort study protocol available on ClinicalTrials.gov), all adult ComBaCaL cohort participants aged 18 years or older are screened for aHT by their VHW according to the diagnostic algorithm of the Lesotho Standard Treatment Guidelines [35].

All non-pregnant adult ComBaCaL cohort participants with aHT, defined as reporting intake of antihypertensive medication or being newly diagnosed during screening, are eligible for aHT TwiC 1 in case of uncontrolled BP levels (≥ 140/90) or for aHT TwiC 2 in case of controlled BP levels (< 140/90). Participants in the control group are followed according to the standard of care in the ComBaCaL cohort which includes aHT screening and referral to health facility-based care in case of diagnosis. In the intervention group, diagnosed participants are offered the intervention by the VHW which they may accept or refuse in addition to the standard of care in the ComBaCaL cohort.

Randomization and blinding

Half of the ComBaCaL cohort villages are randomly allocated to the intervention group by a statistician not involved in the study. The random allocation is stratified by district (Butha-Buthe versus Mokhothlong) and access to health facilities (easy versus difficult access, defined as needing to cross a mountain or river or travel > 10 km to the nearest health facility). Due to the cluster-level randomization and TwiCs approach, participants are blinded to the allocation, meaning that participants in the control villages are not aware of the intervention being implemented in other villages. VHWs who are enrolling participants, providing the intervention, and collecting endpoint data are not blinded to the intervention. This partial blinding is reflected in Fig. 1.

Trial interventions

In control villages, VHWs screen for aHT and confirmed cases are referred to the responsible health facility for further care. VHWs conduct a check-up with another referral (if required) 6 months after enrolment, as part of the routine ComBaCaL cohort care, with no further services provided at the community level.

In intervention villages, VHWs offer a community-based aHT care package that includes lifestyle counseling, prescription of antihypertensive SPCs containing amlopidipine and hydrochlorothiazide at low-dose (5 mg/12.5 mg) or high-dose (10 mg/25 g), lipid-lowering (atorvastatin 10 mg) and antiplatelet (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg) treatment for eligible participants, and treatment support with regular check-ups for participants who are not reaching sufficient BP control with high-dose antihypertensive SPC or having a contraindication against the offered SPC. Guidance for treatment initiation and titration, drug prescription, counseling, and monitoring is provided via the ComBaCaL app, a specifically developed CDSS based on the current Lesotho Standard Treatment Guidelines [35] in line with international guidelines [36, 37]. All activities conducted by VHWs, including counseling and drug prescription, are captured in the ComBaCaL app. VHWs may request support from supervising study staff or routine health care professionals at the responsible health facility. In case of insufficient BP control under high-dose antihypertensive SPC, unclear diagnosis, potential contraindications, side effects or the presence of clinical alarm signs or symptoms, the ComBaCaL app automatically suggests referral of participants to the health facility. Participants are free to accept or refuse the services offered by the VHW at any time. Participants refusing VHW-led services are referred to the responsible health facility for further management with bi-monthly follow-ups by the VHW at the community level for treatment support.

All VHWs have received a 2-week training on the ComBaCaL cohort procedures including usage of the ComBaCaL app, baseline data collection, reporting of relevant clinical events, and screening and diagnosis of aHT. VHWs in the intervention villages received an additional 2-day training on the aHT intervention.

Endpoints

The selection of endpoints is based on the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements’ data collection reference guide for hypertension in low- and middle-income countries V 4.0.0 [38]. The primary endpoint is the BP control rate, measured 12 months after enrolment. Secondary and exploratory endpoints are provided in Table 1. For all endpoints measured after 6 months, a window of 150 to 240 days, and for 12 months’ endpoints, a window of 300 to 420 days after enrolment applies.

Table 1 Primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints
Full size table

Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) are defined as adverse events (AEs) consistent with aHT complications, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertensive emergency, new diagnosis of heart failure or chronic kidney disease, and AEs probably related to intake of antihypertensive medication leading to discontinuation of the medication concerned.

Measurements

Baseline and endpoint assessments are conducted by VHWs guided by the ComBaCaL app through instructions for correct BP measurement procedures, sample collection, and structured questionnaires. BP measurements are conducted according to the Lesotho Standard Treatment Guidelines [35] using automated BP machines (Omron M3 Comfort [HEM7131-E] [47]). BP measurements are taken after determination of the correct cuff size in a sitting position after 5 min of rest with feet on the floor, the arm supported without talking or moving during the measurement. At the first visit, the reference arm is determined by measuring BP on both arms. The arm with higher systolic BP is identified as a reference arm and used for all subsequent BP measurements. The BP value is calculated as the mean of the last two out of three consecutive measurements at intervals of 1 min. For the diagnosis of aHT, two elevated measurements in the range of 140–179/90–109 mmHg on two different days are required or two measurements of 180/110 mmHg or higher on the same day, at least 30 min apart.

Some baseline data are extracted from the ComBaCaL cohort database, including sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometrics, targeted medical history, cardiovascular disease risk factors, physical activity using the validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) [40], dietary habits using a shortened unquantified food frequency questionnaire adapted from an assessment tool for obesity used in South Africa [41] and self-reported alcohol and tobacco use (see Fig. 1 and Table 2). After identification of eligible participants for the aHT TwiCs through BP screenings, further trial baseline data are collected including blood lipids, quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L instrument [42], health beliefs using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire adapted for people living with aHT [43, 44] and self-reported access to care.

Table 2 Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments according to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) [33]
Full size table

Endpoint assessments through home visits by VHWs are scheduled 6 months (range 150 to 240 days) and 12 months (300 to 420 days) after TwiC enrolment. During follow-up visits, VHWs in both groups inquire about the occurrence of possible SAEs or AESIs and document them in the ComBaCaL app. In addition, VHWs may solicit AESIs and SAEs through reporting by participants, friends or relatives, screening of participants’ “bukanas” (personal health booklet) and reporting by routine health facility staff any time during the follow-up period.

Possible AESIs and SAEs flagged by the VHWs will be followed up by supervising study staff to collect further clinical information (see Table 2). The pseudonymized reports will be submitted to the study physician who will remain blinded to the allocation. The study physician will classify the reports as SAEs, AESIs, or neither of the two and conduct a causality assessment for events classified as SAEs or AESIs. In addition, questionnaires about participants’ satisfaction with and acceptability of the TwiCs intervention will be administered and semi-structured interviews conducted with a subsample of participants, VHWs, and involved health care professionals to qualitatively explore perceived risks, benefits, problems, and acceptability of community-based, VHW-led aHT care.

Sample size

Separate sample size calculations for the two TwiCs were performed with the higher of the two defining the overall sample size. Sample sizes were calculated assuming an individual randomization inflated by a design effect that accounts for variation at cluster level, according to Rotondi and Donner [48]. Based on preliminary results from an non-communicable disease prevalence survey in Lesotho [22], we expect an adult prevalence of aHT in rural Lesotho of 18%. Considering an average cluster size of 100 adult inhabitants, the mean number of inhabitants with aHT is estimated at 18 (10 being controlled and 8 uncontrolled).

For aHT TwiC 1, testing the hypothesis that the intervention will lead to superior BP control rates among people with uncontrolled BP, we assume an acceptance rate of 75% in the intervention group (based on a previous study [49] and findings from the pilot cohort), a probability of BP control of 60% among individuals that accept the intervention and 30% among those refusing the intervention. Hence, we assume an overall BP control rate in the intervention group of 52.5%. We further assume an intra-cluster correlation of 0.015 [49, 50], a mean cluster size of 8 (standard deviation = 5), and a probability of BP control of 35% in the control group [22]. A minimal sample size of 304 (152 in each arm, 19 clusters per study arm) is required to detect superiority with a type I error of 0.025 and a statistical power of 80%.

For aHT TwiC 2, testing the hypothesis that the intervention will lead to non-inferior BP control rates among people with controlled BP at baseline, we assume an intra-cluster correlation of 0.015 [49, 50], a mean cluster size of 10 (standard deviation = 5) and a probability of BP control at 12 months of 80% in both intervention and control group. Based on considerations of clinical relevance, the non-inferiority margin is set to a 10% higher probability of failing to reach the primary outcome of BP control (< 140/90 mmHg) in the intervention compared to the control group. This corresponds to an odds ratio (OR) of reaching the primary endpoint of 0.58 between the intervention and the control groups. This implies a minimal sample size of 780 across 78 clusters (390 in each arm, 39 clusters per study arm) to be able to detect non-inferiority with a type I error of 0.025 and a statistical power of 80%. We inflate the calculated maximal number of clusters among the two TwiCs by 25% to account for uncertainties in the estimates of aHT prevalence, number of ComBaCaL village inhabitants, and the acceptance rate reaching a total number of 98 clusters. Due to operational reasons, we finally decided to recruit in all 103 ComBaCaL cohort villages, for an anticipated sample size of 824 participants with uncontrolled aHT (TwiC 1) and 1030 participants with controlled aHT (TwiC 2). Through repeated home visits by the VHWs, maximum recruitment within these 103 villages will be ensured while adding further villages in case the sample size is not reached is not possible.

Statistical analysis

Analyses will be performed following the principles for the analysis of cluster-randomized trials in health research as outlined by Donner and Klar [51]. For both TwiCs, we will use a mixed effect logistic regression model adjusted for stratification factors, sex, and age, with a random intercept at the level of the clusters.

Primary hypotheses of aHT TwiC 1 (superiority of the intervention in people with uncontrolled BP at baseline) and aHT TwiC 2 (non-inferiority of the intervention in people with controlled aHT at baseline) will be assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis set, including all participants as randomized except those with pregnancy or traumatic death during the follow-up. Our intervention is the offer of a community-based care package, and our primary analyses focus on assessing its effect in a real-world setting. Full adherence to the offered care package is not expected and therefore no strict per-protocol analyses will be performed.

For analyses of secondary outcomes, we will use mixed effects logistic or linear regression models, depending on the nature of the outcome, without formal testing. Serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, adherence to antihypertensive treatment, and exploratory outcomes will be analyzed descriptively. Details are outlined in the statistical analysis plan available as a supplementary document.

Data management and monitoring

All ComBaCaL VHWs received a password-protected tablet with the ComBaCaL app installed. The ComBaCaL app serves as CDSS and data collection tool. It is based on the open source Community Health Toolkit Core Framework, a widely-used, offline-first, open source software toolkit designed for community health systems [52]. Data are synchronized regularly to a secure server hosted at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. All shared data exports will be pseudonymized. Data are monitored locally by the VHW supervisors and centrally by the data management team of the University Hospital Basel. The intervention assessed in these TwiCs entails the task-shifting of aHT services according to local and international guidelines. It has a low risk profile and therefore neither the establishment of an external data monitoring committee nor a formal interim analysis is planned.

Discussion

Many countries in Africa and other LMICs have established VHW systems that are traditionally focusing on maternal and neonatal health and on communicable diseases, especially HIV/AIDS [53]. In recent years, evidence has emerged showing a beneficial effect and high cost-effectiveness of VHW-based models for diseases outside the traditional scope, especially for non-communicable diseases [10, 11, 13, 54]. While VHW-based aHT care models focusing on educational, screening, monitoring, and referral services have shown positive effects on linkage to care, adherence, and BP levels, the effectiveness on BP reduction remained limited, probably due to the inability of VHWs to deliver pharmacological treatment [10, 13, 55]. Recently, two landmark studies in China, Malaysia, and Colombia have shown significant and clinically relevant reductions in BP levels and cardiovascular risk through community-based non-physician healthcare worker-led multifaceted interventions including delivery of pharmacological treatment [56, 57]. However, the generalizability of these findings to the African context is limited. The study in China involved village health doctors with multi-year medical training and considerable clinical experience [57], a cadre that is not existing in most LMICs, especially in Africa. The study in Colombia and Malaysia relied on drug prescription by healthcare professionals and community health workers merely delivered the drugs, an approach that might limit effective scale-up. [58]. According to a recent scoping review, our two TwiCs will be the first to assess a multifaceted, community-based, VHW-led aHT care intervention including pharmacological treatment in Africa [24].

A strength of both TwiCs is their implementation within an established village cohort that is integrated into the local healthcare system. The study team will provide monitoring to ensure participant safety and data quality, but the intervention will be provided by VHWs recruited within the Lesotho Ministry of Health VHW program [25] and all parts of the intervention will be delivered according to the current Lesotho Standard Treatment Guidelines [35]. The TwiCs design allows to assess the intervention under conditions close to real life: participants in control villages are not aware of the intervention in other villages, while participants in intervention villages are being offered the intervention with oral consent, as it would be the case in routine care.

As per international recommendations [37], a holistic approach to cardiovascular disease management is applied; the intervention does not only include BP control measures, but consists of a comprehensive package including lifestyle counseling, lipid-lowering and antiplatelet treatment for those eligible, and the estimated 10-year risk for a cardiovascular event is a secondary outcome of both TwiCs. The two aHT TwiCs are implemented in parallel with another TwiC nested in the ComBaCaL cohort that is assessing a similar healthcare service package delivered by the same VHWs but for type 2 diabetes mellitus [59]. This combination allows us to gather valuable experience and empirical evidence about implementing community-based integrated service delivery for two major non-communicable diseases simultaneously.

The World Health Organization guidelines on digital interventions for health system strengthening are recommending the use of mobile CDSS for health workers at the community level [60]. However, a recent systematic review found that conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions on BP control in Africa is absent and that large randomized controlled trials are required to produce such [61]. These two TwiCs will address this evidence gap.

The two TwiCs have several limitations. First, VHWs in control villages are also conducting BP screenings and offer regular referral services, as part of the routine cohort procedures, which in itself is an intervention and has to be considered when interpreting the results. Second, due to the multifaceted nature of the intervention, conclusions on the effects of individual components will be limited. Third, the randomization for the TwiCs happens before the identification of eligible trial participants, because VHWs in each arm need specific training before they identify the first participant in their village. This design choice brings two challenges: the possibility of empty clusters and the possibility of differential recruitment [62]. Those challenges are minimized by VHWs systematically screening and diagnosing all ComBaCaL cohort participants in their villages during repeated home visits according to predefined algorithms and thus identifying all eligible TwiCs participants in their village irrespective of the trial arm.

In summary, these TwiCs are assessing the effectiveness of a comprehensive, CDSS-supported, VHW-led, setting-adapted, community-based aHT intervention within the existing Lesotho Village Health Program. They will generate the evidence required for the future development of community-based aHT care models in Lesotho and similar settings.

Trial status

This manuscript is based on the approved study protocol version 1.1, dated February 07, 2023. Recruitment for the TwiCs started on September 08, 2023, and is ongoing. 697 participants with uncontrolled BP (≥ 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled in aHT TwiC 1 and 750 participants with controlled BP (< 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled in aHT TwiC 2 on May 20, 2024, prior to submission of this manuscript. We expect enrolment to be completed in June 2024.

Availability of data and materials

We will make pseudo-anonymized individual data freely available on a suitable repository, such as zenodo.org, along with publication of the study results. The full protocol as submitted to ethics committees is available on clinicaltrials.gov. Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal without the use of professional writers and communicated to local health authorities and community stakeholders. Access to the test environment of the ComBaCaL app is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AESI:

Adverse event of special interest

aHT:

Arterial hypertension

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CDSS:

Clinical decision support system

ComBaCaL:

Community-Based chronic disease Care Lesotho

CVDRF:

Cardiovascular disease risk factor

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

SAE:

Serious adverse event

SPC:

Single-pill combination

TwiC:

Trial within Cohort

VHW:

Village health worker

References

  1. Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The Global Cardiovascular Risk Consortium, Magnussen C, Ojeda FM, Leong DP, Alegre-Diaz J, Amouyel P, et al. Global Effect of Modifiable Risk Factors on Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(14):1273–85.

  3. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gouda HN, Charlson F, Sorsdahl K, Ahmadzada S, Ferrari AJ, Erskine H, et al. Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(10):e1375–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. The Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus ME, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, et al. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data from 1·1 million adults. The Lancet. 2019;394(10199):652–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamloum D, Fassio F, Osetinsky B, Tediosi F. Care Cascades for Hypertension in Low-Income Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Public Health. 2023;12(68):1606428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. Global report on hypertension: the race against a silent killer. Geneva; 2023.

  9. Kontis V, Cobb LK, Mathers CD, Frieden TR, Ezzati M, Danaei G. Three Public Health Interventions Could Save 94 Million Lives in 25 Years: Global Impact Assessment Analysis. Circulation. 2019;140(9):715–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mbuthia GW, Magutah K, Pellowski J. Approaches and outcomes of community health worker’s interventions for hypertension management and control in low-income and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4): e053455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeet G, Thakur JS, Prinja S, Singh M. Community health workers for non-communicable diseases prevention and control in developing countries: Evidence and implications. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7): e0180640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khetan AK, Purushothaman R, Chami T, Hejjaji V, Madan Mohan SK, Josephson RA, et al. The Effectiveness of Community Health Workers for CVD Prevention in LMIC. Glob Heart. 2017;12(3):233-243.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anand TN, Joseph LM, Geetha AV, Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P. Task sharing with non-physician health-care workers for management of blood pressure in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(6):e761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Owoyemi A, Osuchukwu JI, Azubuike C, Ikpe RK, Nwachukwu BC, Akinde CB, et al. Digital Solutions for Community and Primary Health Workers: Lessons From Implementations in Africa. Front Digit Health. 2022;4: 876957.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Swartz A, LeFevre AE, Perera S, Kinney MV, George AS. Multiple pathways to scaling up and sustainability: an exploration of digital health solutions in South Africa. Glob Health. 2021;17(1):77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal S, Glenton C, Tamrat T, Henschke N, Maayan N, Fønhus MS, et al. Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 27;2021(7). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2 [cited 2024 May 7]

  17. Staehelin D, Dolata M, Peyer N, Gerber F, Schwabe G. Algorithmic Management for Community Health Worker in Sub-Saharan Africa: Curse or Blessing? In: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023: 19th IFIP TC13 International Conference, York, UK, August 28 – September 1, 2023, Proceedings, Part III. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2023. p. 94–114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_6

  18. Benjamin IJ, Kreutz R, Olsen MH, Schutte AE, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Frieden TR, et al. Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications. The Lancet. 2019;394(10199):637–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruyn E, Nguyen L, Schutte AE, Murphy A, Perel P, Webster R. Implementing Single-Pill Combination Therapy for Hypertension: A Scoping Review of Key Health System Requirements in 30 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Glob Heart. 17(1):6.

  20. Agarwal S, Perry HB, Long L, Labrique AB. Evidence on feasibility and effective use of mHealth strategies by frontline health workers in developing countries: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20(8):1003–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. DiPette DJ, Skeete J, Ridley E, Campbell NRC, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Kishore SP, et al. Fixed-dose combination pharmacologic therapy to improve hypertension control worldwide: Clinical perspective and policy implications. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;21(1):4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández LG, Firima E, Gupta R, Sematle M, Khomolishoele M, Molulela M, et al. Awareness, treatment, and control among adults living with arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus in two rural districts in Lesotho. In Review; 2023 Jul. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3189573/v1 [cited 2023 Oct 18]

  23. González Fernández L, Firima E, Gupta R, Sematle MP, Khomolishoele M, Molulela M, et al. Prevalence and determinants of cardiovascular risk factors in Lesotho: a population-based survey. Int Health. 2024;16(3):313–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández LG, Firima E, Robinson E, Ursprung F, Huber J, Amstutz A, et al. Community-based care models for arterial hypertension management in non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a literature scoping review and framework for designing chronic services. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ministry of Health Lesotho. The Village Health Program Policy. 2020.

  26. Joseph JK, Rigodon J, Cancedda C, Haidar M, Lesia N, Ramanagoela L, et al. Lay health workers and HIV care in rural Lesotho: a report from the field. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012;26(3):141–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amstutz A, Lejone TI, Khesa L, Muhairwe J, Bresser M, Vanobberghen F, et al. Home-based oral self-testing for absent and declining individuals during a door-to-door HIV testing campaign in rural Lesotho (HOSENG): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2020;7(11):e752–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunachie S, Chamnan P. The double burden of diabetes and global infection in low and middle-income countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;113(2):56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Geneva: World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases Data Portal: Lesotho NCD Country Profile. 2022. Available from: https://ncdportal.org/CountryProfile/GHE110/LSO#risk-factor6 [cited 2023 Nov 29]

  31. Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ. 2010;19(340): c1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Der Velden JM, Verkooijen HM, Young-Afat DA, Burbach JPM, Van Vulpen M, Relton C, et al. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials? Int J Epidemiol. 2016;25:96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.e7586

  34. Caille A, Kerry S, Tavernier E, Leyrat C, Eldridge S, Giraudeau B. Timeline cluster: a graphical tool to identify risk of bias in cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2016;16(354): i4291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ministry of Health Lesotho. Standard Treatment Guidelines for Lesotho. 2022.

  36. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. 2020;75(6):1334–57.

  38. ICHOM International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. Hypertension in low- and middle-income countries Data collection reference guide V 4.0.0. 2022. Available from: https://connect.ichom.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/17-Hypertension_in_LMIC_Reference_Guide_V4.0_30.03.2022.pdf [cited 2023 Nov 5]

  39. WHO Cvd Risk Charts Working Group. World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(10):e1332–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381–95.

  41. Okeyo AP, Seekoe E, de Villiers A, Faber M, Nel JH, Steyn NP. Dietary Practices and Adolescent Obesity in Secondary School Learners at Disadvantaged Schools in South Africa: Urban-Rural and Gender Differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(3):647–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: The development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health. 1999;14(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mostafavi F, Najimi A, Sharifirad G, Golshiri P. Beliefs About Medicines in Patients with Hypertension: the Instrument Validity and Reliability in Iran. Mater Socio Medica. 2016;28(4):298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hajifathalian K, Ueda P, Lu Y, Woodward M, Ahmadvand A, Aguilar-Salinas CA, et al. A novel risk score to predict cardiovascular disease risk in national populations (Globorisk): a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts and health examination surveys. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(5):339–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi H, Yoshika M, Yokoi T. Validation of two automatic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060–2:2009 guidelines: the Omron BP765 (HEM-7311-ZSA) and the Omron BP760N (HEM-7320-Z). Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Jan;49.

  48. Rotondi M, Donner A. Sample size estimation in cluster randomized trials: An evidence-based perspective. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56(5):1174–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Amstutz A, Lejone TI, Khesa L, Kopo M, Kao M, Muhairwe J, et al. Offering ART refill through community health workers versus clinic-based follow-up after home-based same-day ART initiation in rural Lesotho: The VIBRA cluster-randomized clinical trial. Newell ML, editor. PLOS Med. 2021 Oct 21;18(10):e1003839.

  50. Lee YL, Lim YMF, Law KB, Sivasampu S. Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Trials. 2020;16(21):530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. London: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Community Health Toolkit. Community Health Toolkit. Available from: https://communityhealthtoolkit.org [cited 2023 May 29]

  53. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G, Huicho L. Global Experience of Community Health Workers for Delivery of Health Related Millennium Development Goals: A Systematic Review, Country Case Studies, and Recommendations for Integration into National Health Systems. World Health Organization, Global Health Workforce Alliance; 2010. Available from: https://chwcentral.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Global-Experience-of-Community-Health-Workers-for-Delivery-of-Health-Related-Millennium-Development-Goals.pdf

  54. Augustovski F, Chaparro M, Palacios A, Shi L, Beratarrechea A, Irazola V, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Approach for Hypertension Control in Low-Income Settings in Argentina: Trial-Based Analysis of the Hypertension Control Program in Argentina. Value Health. 2018;21(12):1357–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ogedegbe G, Gyamfi J, Plange-Rhule J, Surkis A, Rosenthal DM, Airhihenbuwa C, et al. Task shifting interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10): e005983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Schwalm JD, McCready T, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Yusoff K, Attaran A, Lamelas P, et al. A community-based comprehensive intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in hypertension (HOPE 4): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun Y, Mu J, Wang DW, Ouyang N, Xing L, Guo X, et al. A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial. The Lancet. 2022;399(10339):1964–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hendriks M, van Andel J, Asiki G, Kyobutungi C. Cardiovascular risk in hypertension: open questions about HOPE 4. The Lancet. 2020;396(10247):309–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gerber F, Gupta R, Lejone TI, Tahirsylaj T, Lee T, Kohler M, et al. Community-based type 2 diabetes care by lay village health workers in rural Lesotho: protocol for a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL T2D TwiC). Trials. 2023;24(1):688.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311941 [cited 2023 Jun 5]

  61. Aovare P, Abdulai K, Laar A, van der Linden EL, Moens N, Richard E, et al. Assessing the Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Diabetes and Hypertension Management in Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2023;29(11): e43742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Giraudeau B, Ravaud P. Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials. PLoS Med. 2009;6(5): e1000065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the SolidarMed team in Lesotho and Switzerland, and the involved VHWs for their essential contributions to these TwiCs and the ComBaCaL project. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the students from the Department of Informatics of the University of Zurich under the supervision of Dario Staehelin and Gerhard Schwabe who have contributed to the development of the pilot version of the ComBaCaL app.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Basel These TwiCs are part of the ComBaCaL project which is funded by the TRANSFORM grant of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (project number 7F-10345.01.01) and a grant by the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF-1778). FG’s salary is funded through a personal MD/PhD grant by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 323530_207035). AA’s salary is funded through a career grant of the University of Basel (Junior Research Fund). The funders had no role in the design of the TwiCs and will not have any role during its analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Niklaus Daniel Labhardt and Alain Amstutz contributed equally to this work and shared the last authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Felix Gerber, Thabo Ishmael Lejone, Thesar Tahirsylaj, Tristan Lee, Giuliana Sanchez-Samaniego, Maurus Kohler, Maria-Inés Haldemann, Fabian Raeber, Dave Brian Basler, Kevin Kindler, Matthias Briel, Frédérique Chammartin, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt & Alain Amstutz

  2. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Felix Gerber, Thabo Ishmael Lejone, Thesar Tahirsylaj, Tristan Lee, Giuliana Sanchez-Samaniego, Maurus Kohler, Maria-Inés Haldemann, Fabian Raeber, Matthias Briel, Frédérique Chammartin, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt & Alain Amstutz

  3. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland

    Felix Gerber

  4. SolidarMed Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho

    Ravi Gupta, Mamakhala Chitja, Malebona Mathulise, Thuso Kabi, Mosoetsi Mokaeane, Malehloa Maphenchane, Manthabiseng Molulela, Makhebe Khomolishoele, Mota Mota, Sesale Masike, Matumaole Bane, Mamoronts’ane Pauline Sematle & Retselisitsoe Makabateng

  5. Ministry of Health Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho

    Madavida Mphunyane & Sejojo Phaaroe

  6. Faculty of Business, Economics and Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Kevin Kindler

  7. Medical Outpatient Department and Hypertension Clinic, ESH Hypertension Centre of Excellence, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Thilo Burkard

  8. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Thilo Burkard

  9. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

    Matthias Briel

  10. Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Alain Amstutz

  11. Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Alain Amstutz

Authors
  1. Felix Gerber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thabo Ishmael Lejone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thesar Tahirsylaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tristan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giuliana Sanchez-Samaniego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maurus Kohler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maria-Inés Haldemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fabian Raeber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mamakhala Chitja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Malebona Mathulise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Thuso Kabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mosoetsi Mokaeane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Malehloa Maphenchane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Manthabiseng Molulela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Makhebe Khomolishoele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Mota Mota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Sesale Masike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Matumaole Bane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Mamoronts’ane Pauline Sematle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Retselisitsoe Makabateng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Madavida Mphunyane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Sejojo Phaaroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Dave Brian Basler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Kevin Kindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Thilo Burkard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Matthias Briel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Frédérique Chammartin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Alain Amstutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AA and NDL are the principal investigators, they acquired the main funding, led the project, and substantially contributed to the manuscript. FG drafted the manuscript, led the clinical development of the ComBaCaL app, supported the implementation, and conceptualized the TwiCs together with the principal investigators. RG (lead), TIL, MC, TK, MalebM, MalehM, MosM, MotM, ManM, MK, PMS, MB, and RM are responsible for the local implementation of the TwiCs through training and supervision of VHWs and local data monitoring. TT, MK, MIH, and FR supported the development of the ComBaCaL app and the training of VHWs. TL and GSS are responsible for central data management, and SM for the local data management. MadM and SP are responsible for the collaboration with the Lesotho Ministry of Health and gave input on the study design of the TwiCs to ensure alignment with local guidelines and practices. DB and KK lead the technical development of the ComBaCaL app. TB reviewed and approved the clinical algorithms. MB gave substantial input on the study design. FC is the trial statistician and conducted the sample size calculations and is responsible for statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Gerber.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

These TwiCs were approved by the National Health Research and Ethics Committee (NH-REC) of Lesotho (ID 102–2022) and the Ethikkomission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ) in Switzerland (ID AO_2022_00074). Protocol amendments will be communicated to the involved ethics committees and updated on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Participants for the TwiCs are recruited among the ComBaCaL cohort population. All participants gave written informed consent with electronic signatures to participate in the ComBaCaL cohort study and to be randomly selected for nested TwiCs (31,32).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerber, F., Gupta, R., Lejone, T.I. et al. Community-based management of arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors by lay village health workers for people with controlled and uncontrolled blood pressure in rural Lesotho: joint protocol for two cluster-randomized trials within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL aHT Twic 1 and ComBaCaL aHT TwiC 2). Trials 25, 365 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08226-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08226-2

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215