Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled parallel study to investigate the effect of sex and dietary nitrate on COVID-19 vaccine-induced vascular dysfunction in healthy men and women: protocol of the DiNOVasc-COVID-19 study

Trials volume 24, Article number: 593 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular events, driven by endothelial dysfunction, are a recognised complication of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infections remain a persistent concern globally, and an understanding of the mechanisms causing endothelial dysfunction, particularly the role of inflammation, nitric oxide, and whether sex differences exist in this response, is lacking. We have previously demonstrated important sex differences in the inflammatory response and its impact on endothelial function and separately that the ingestion of inorganic nitrate can protect the endothelium against this dysfunction. In this study, we will investigate whether sex or a dietary inorganic nitrate intervention modulates endothelial function and inflammatory responses after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods

DiNOVasc-COVID-19 is a double-blind, randomised, single-centre, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 98 healthy volunteers (49 males and 49 females) will be recruited. Participants will be randomised into 1 of 2 sub-studies: part A or part B. Part A will investigate the effects of sex on vascular and inflammatory responses to the COVID-19 vaccine. Part B will investigate the effects of sex and dietary inorganic nitrate on vascular and inflammatory responses to the COVID-19 vaccine. In part B, participants will be randomised to receive 3 days of either nitrate-containing beetroot juice (intervention) or nitrate-deplete beetroot juice (placebo). The primary outcome for both sub-studies is a comparison of the change in flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) from baseline after COVID-19 vaccination. The study has a power of > 80% to assess the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in inflammatory and leukocyte counts and in pulse wave analysis (PWA) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) following the COVID-19 vaccination.

Discussion

This study aims to evaluate whether sex or dietary influences endothelial function and inflammatory responses in healthy volunteers after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04889274. Registered on 5 May 2023. The study was approved by the South Central – Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (21/SC/0154).

Peer Review reports

Background

Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at greater risk of severe COVID-19 and worse outcomes [1,2,3,4]. Additionally, there has been increasing recognition of specific cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 including acute coronary syndromes and myocarditis, amongst others [5,6,7,8,9]. Importantly, the incidence of such cardiovascular complications is greater in men than in women [10, 11]. The mechanisms underlying these cardiovascular manifestations might be secondary to the severe inflammatory response induced by COVID-19, as well as the virus itself. These might result in endothelial dysfunction [12, 13], thus inducing hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulable states [14]. In health, the endothelium exhibits anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic properties that prevent vascular inflammation and opposes thrombogenesis [15], effects mediated predominantly by the soluble mediator nitric oxide (NO) [16,17,18]. In disease, the systemic inflammatory response and subsequent endothelial dysfunction reduce NO bioavailability [19]. Recently, we have demonstrated that inorganic nitrate can mitigate against typhoid vaccine-induced endothelial dysfunction, with suppression of pro-inflammatory cell types, and simultaneously enhance the resolution of inflammation with increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [20]. It is possible that the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction also contributes to the severity of COVID-19 disease.

Thus, to study the impact of systemic inflammation (related to COVID-19) upon endothelial function, in men and women, we have assessed vascular reactivity in both sexes prior to and following COVID-19 vaccination, and assessed whether augmentation of NO levels, via delivery of dietary inorganic nitrate which augments NO via activation of the non-canonical pathway [21], improves endothelial function where dysfunction is evident.

Methods and design

Trial objectives

Aims of research: We wish to test whether sex differences exist in inflammatory responses and thereby vascular function after delivery of the COVID-19 vaccine, as a model of endothelial dysfunction induced by COVID-19. Secondly, we also wish to determine whether inorganic nitrate supplementation protects against endothelial dysfunction in this COVID-19 setting.

Participant selection

This is a single-centre study and participants will be recruited from the Barts Health NHS Trust catchment area, including all NHS-approved vaccination hubs. In addition, we will identify participants from Queen Mary University of London and Barts and The London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry.

Original hypothesis

We hypothesise that the COVID-19 vaccine will induce inflammatory responses and thus endothelial dysfunction. However, we expect women to be protected against vascular dysfunction and hypothesise that dietary inorganic nitrate will attenuate the consequent vascular dysfunction following the delivery of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Primary endpoints

Part A

  1. 1.

    Comparison between the sexes of the change in flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) from the baseline FMD response after COVID-19 vaccination

Part B

  1. 1.

    Comparison of change in FMD from baseline after COVID-19 vaccination following inorganic nitrate versus placebo supplementation

  2. 2.

    Comparison of change in plasma nitrite concentration ([NO2−]) following inorganic nitrate versus placebo supplementation

Secondary endpoints

  1. 1.

    Comparison of change in peripheral markers of inflammation and leucocyte count following COVID-19 vaccination between the sexes

  2. 2.

    Comparison of change in peripheral markers of inflammation and leucocyte count following COVID-19 vaccination and nitrate versus placebo supplementation

  3. 3.

    Comparison of change in PWV from baseline following COVID-19 vaccination and nitrate versus placebo supplementation

  4. 4.

    Comparison of change in PWA from baseline following COVID-19 vaccination and nitrate versus placebo supplementation

  5. 5.

    Comparison of GTN-induced vasodilation in the brachial artery from baseline following COVID-19 vaccination and nitrate versus placebo supplementation

Inclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Healthy volunteers with either a confirmed booking or a plan to book their 1st COVID-19 vaccination or due delivery of a 2nd or booster dose of any COVID-19 vaccine within the upcoming 92 days, as per government guidelines

  2. 2.

    Aged 18–60

  3. 3.

    Volunteers willing to sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Healthy subjects unwilling to consent

  2. 2.

    Pregnant or any possibility that a subject may be pregnant

  3. 3.

    History of any serious illnesses (such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease, autoimmune conditions, and any condition which requires treatment with medication), including recent infections or trauma

  4. 4.

    Subjects taking systemic medication (other than the oral contraceptive pill)

  5. 5.

    Subjects with self-reported use of mouthwash or tongue scrapes

  6. 6.

    Subjects with recent (2 weeks) or current antibiotic use

  7. 7.

    Subjects with a history or recent treatment of (within the last 3 months) any oral condition (excluding caries), including gingivitis, periodontitis, and halitosis

  8. 8.

    Subjects with a history of COVID-19 vaccination within the preceding 28 days

  9. 9.

    Subjects with any history of a blood-borne infectious disease such as hepatitis B or C virus or HIV

Study design and intervention

This is a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study. A total of 98 healthy volunteers (male and female, aged 18–60) as per inclusion criteria will be recruited following the provision of consent (model consent form added as Supplementary Document). Figure 1 shows a summary of the study scheme. Figure 2 shows the SPIRIT figure summary of the study. Participants will be screened having either booked their COVID-19 vaccination or have a plan to do so in the upcoming 92 days. Participants are able to receive any vaccine manufacturer or a combination available to them (with the manufacturer recorded in the case report form). Screening will take place virtually or in person. Participants will be randomised into 1 of 2 parts of the study. Both study parts will take place at the William Harvey Clinical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. Participants will be eligible for inclusion if they do not suffer from any illnesses that require the use of prescription medication (other than the oral contraceptive pill), and thus, the use of prescription medicines will exclude them from the study. Furthermore, following randomisation, the participant will still be eligible to undergo usual care should they require it during the study including concomitant planned and unplanned medical care (unrelated to the study itself) and medication for the time period of the physical visits and biological sampling; such an event would exclude them from the study. All events will be recorded in the case report form.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DiNOVasc-COVID-19 study summary scheme. BP, blood pressure; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NHS, National Health Service; PWA, pulse wave analysis; PWV, pulse wave velocity

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

SPIRIT figure. Summary SPIRIT figure showing the visit structure and events during the clinical study

Full size image

Part A: 15 men and 15 women will be randomised into part A. This part of the study will recruit equal numbers of men and women to compare the influence of biological sex on inflammatory responses and vascular function following the COVID-19 vaccine.

Part B: 34 men and 34 women will be randomised into part B. In this study, we will recruit equal numbers of men and women and make comparisons of the effects of dietary inorganic nitrate and sex on vascular function and inflammatory responses. After randomisation into part B, participants will undergo further randomisation to receive either 70 mL of a nitrate-containing beetroot juice (5–6 mmol, James White Drinks Ltd., UK, Beet It® Sport Nitrate 400 Shot) or nitrate-deplete placebo control.

Baseline measurements of BP, PWA, PWV, FMD, blood, urine, and saliva will be taken at visit 2. Participants randomised to part B will begin taking a daily dose of the beetroot juice 2 days before receiving their COVID-19 vaccination and consume 3 consecutive daily doses. The last dose will be taken on the morning of the vaccine. All participants will receive their COVID-19 vaccination on the morning of visit 3 and return to the clinical research facility to undergo repeat measurements of BP, PWA, PWV, FMD, blood, urine, and saliva 8 ± 2 h after the vaccine. Visit 4 will occur 28 ± 1 days after delivery of the vaccine, at which point participants will be asked to complete a bespoke experience questionnaire. This questionnaire is bespoke and has been tailored to capture specific aspects of symptoms before and after the COVID-19 vaccination and scored from 0 to 10. These include general health, anxiety and stress, fatigue, and muscle/joint pain. We have also incorporated a rating on the experience of the intervention/placebo and included yes/no questions for whether the juice intervention/placebo was easily incorporated into their daily routine and whether the participant would be keen to continue the intervention as a lifestyle measure if found to be beneficial.

Patients will be recruited throughout all waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Timing of when COVID-19 vaccination and previous COVID-19 infection will be obtained, to permit exploratory analyses of differences between COVID-19 waves and/or the presence of previous COVID-19 infections.

Randomisation and blinding process

A total of 98 healthy volunteers will be recruited. Part A is an observational study in which 15 males and 15 females will be recruited. Part B is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial and will enrol 34 males and 34 females. Randomisation into parts A and B will occur in a 1:2 fashion using block randomisation, such that recruitment occurs over a similar timespan.

In part B, 1:1 block randomisation will be used to allocate participants to nitrate-containing beetroot juice or nitrate-deplete beetroot juice (placebo). The treatment assignment of the volunteers will remain blinded until the end of the study, at which point the study will be unblinded. If emergency unblinding is required, the chief investigator will be informed. A list of the unblinded treatment allocations will be stored in a secure location at the William Harvey Clinical Research Centre and be available at all times.

Study start and end dates

Recruitment commenced on 21 April 2021. The provisional end date of the study is April 2024.

Methods to be used

All sample analyses will be conducted blind to group allocation.

Blood, urine, and saliva analysis

Venous blood samples will be acquired, and plasma will be stored at − 80 °C for exploratory analyses. Blood samples will be sent for clinical haematological and biochemical analysis. From a separate blood sample, polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will be isolated.

Flow cytometry will be used to assess platelet activation and platelet leukocyte aggregates (CD42b, CD14, CD16b, CD16). Platelet P-selectin (CD62P) expression and platelet number will be determined using cell counting beads (Thermo Fisher). Platelet P-selectin expression in response to agonists, collagen (with HEPES buffer solution), and ADP will be assessed. Platelet aggregation responses to the platelet stimuli (ADP and collagen) will be assessed using a Multiplate® aggregometer reader.

Total RNA will be extracted from isolated PMNs and PBMCs using a RNeasy® Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (including DNAse treatment) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Saliva samples will be centrifuged, and a pellet generated, which will contain the genetic material of the oral microbiota. A saliva sample will also be collected for human genomic sequencing using an Oragene® OG-600 human saliva DNA storage kit (DNA Genotek™, Canada).

Plasma, urine, and saliva nitrate/nitrite concentration will be determined using liquid-phase ozone chemiluminescence as previously described [22, 23]. A sample of juice from each participant in part B will be acquired, and nitrate and nitrite quantified using the same methods. All measurements will be conducted by an individual blinded to the intervention allocations.

Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity

PWA and PWV are non-invasive measures of arterial stiffness and compliance. PWA and PWV are quantified using a Vicorder® device (Skidmore Medical Ltd., UK). PWA will be assessed by applying a cuff to the non-dominant arm, with the participant lying in the supine position. PWV will be determined by placing a cuff around both the femoral and carotid arteries simultaneously. The cuffs are inflated to ~ 65 mmHg, and the corresponding oscillometric signal from each cuff is digitally analysed to extract the pulse time delay. The aortic length is estimated by measuring the distance between the femoral cuff and the supra-sternal notch. PWV is calculated by using the formula: PWV = aortic distance/pulse time delay [24].

Flow-mediated dilatation

FMD is a non-invasive method of measuring endothelial function in vivo [25]. The technique uses vascular ultrasound to measure the luminal dimension of the brachial artery, which dilates following a period of limb ischaemia, owing to the release of several endothelial factors, including NO [26]. This will be performed in accordance with recently published guidelines [27]. A high-resolution external vascular ultrasound Siemens/Acuson Sequoia C256 Colour Doppler, with a 7.0-MHz linear-array transducer supported by a stereotactic clamp, will be used to image the brachial artery with the patient lying in a supine position. The brachial artery will be visualised in longitudinal section. The image is projected onto automated edge detection software (FMD Studio, Cardiovascular Suite, Quipo Srl., Italy). The edge detection algorithm tracks the vascular intima in real time providing an automated and unbiased assessment of brachial artery diameter with automated FMD calculation. A pulse-wave Doppler sample volume is placed centrally within the lumen of the vessel and calibrated to record real-time shear rate. A pneumatic cuff is placed over the upper forearm and inflated to 300 mmHg for 5 min. The cuff is then released, and the brachial artery is observed for a further 5 min. FMD is defined as the percentage increase in vessel diameter after the release of the pneumatic cuff.

Following the measurement of FMD, 0.4 mg of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) will be administered, and the luminal diameter of the brachial artery will be measured for a period of 5 min to assess GTN-induced smooth muscle-mediated brachial artery dilatation.

Follow-up

At 28 ± 1 days after visit 3, participants will be followed up by telephone, or in person at the William Harvey Clinical Research Centre at the William Harvey Research Institute at Queen Mary University of London, to complete a brief questionnaire based upon specific aspects of symptoms.

End of study definition

The study will end after the last participant completes visit 4. All samples will be analysed at the end of the study.

Sample size determination and statistical analysis

In this study, we aim to recruit 98 participants, with 30 healthy volunteers in part A and 64 in part B. This sample size will empower the study to test the primary endpoint.

These numbers have been based upon our previous experience with typhoid vaccination which causes a reduction in FMD of ~ 1.5% absolute units which is a reduction of approximately 25% of the response [28]. We have previously identified sex differences in the response to typhoid vaccine, with a change from baseline of FMD of − 0.5 (SD = 2.4) in men and 2.4 (SD = 2.5) in women [29]. For part A, using these data, if we use a conservative effect size of 25% less than that achieved in our previously published study, 13 participants are required in each group to provide 90% power for the primary outcome. To account for potential dropouts of ~ 10%, 15 participants will be recruited into each group and thus 30 volunteers in total. For the analysis of part A, a linear regression model will be used to compare changes in vascular dysfunction pre- to post-vaccination between the sexes, unadjusted and adjusted for important risk factors including age, body mass index, and baseline vessel diameter.

Our unpublished preliminary data investigating the effects of dietary inorganic nitrate on vascular responses (FMD) has identified a decrease in FMD from baseline of 1.4 (SD = 1.5) with typhoid vaccine and with dietary nitrate intervention only 0.08 (SD = 1.7) [20]. Based on these data, for the primary outcome of change in FMD, 25 participants will be required in each group at an 80% power, to observe a difference between the intervention arms. To observe the differences between the sexes, 30 in each group provides a 90% power, which will also offer a > 95% power to detect a rise in [NO2−], as observed in previous studies [30]. To account for potential dropouts of ~ 10%, a total of 68 volunteers will be recruited. For the statistical analysis in part B, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to compare the change in vascular dysfunction pre- to post-vaccination, between dietary nitrate and placebo control groups adjusting for pre-vaccination level, and to compare the change in plasma [NO2−] between the dietary nitrate and placebo control groups.

Personal data will be stored in a secured site file and clinical notes in a paper CRF, which will be security locked and coded. Only the direct research team will have access to the trial CRF. The subject will be given a unique, single identifier which will be used to identify data and samples. Results data will only be stored, shared, analysed, transmitted, and presented in an anonymised form. Participant experience questionnaires will be completed and stored in the secure CRF. Reasons for drop-out or deviation from protocol will be detailed in full. Data quality will be assessed upon completion of the study and stored electronically. Confidentiality will be maintained through these secure measures before, during, and after the trial. Data access will be granted only to direct study members. Upon completion of the study, a fully blinded data analysis will be undertaken by a statistician.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol, participant facing documentation, recruitment and advertising material, and all amendments were submitted by the chief investigator to a Health Research Authority REC (South Central – Oxford C Research Ethics Committee, identification code 21/SC/0154). Written approval from the committee was obtained, as was sponsor approval, prior to initiating recruitment.

Safety considerations

In part B, the intervention is 70 mL of concentrated beetroot juice (both nitrate-replete and placebo manufactured by James White Drinks Ltd., UK). To manufacture the placebo, an anion exchange resin is used. There are no known serious side effects related to consumption of either the intervention or placebo, and the juice is classed as a foodstuff. Recent publications support its use in clinical trials [31,32,33]. In the unlikely event that a serious adverse event (SAE) occurs, this will be reviewed by the chief investigator. There will be no special criteria for discontinuing or modifying the allocated intervention; however, if a decision to withdraw participants from the study is required, this will be made by the chief investigator and detailed in the final manuscript.

Safety reporting

Any adverse event (AE) will be recorded in the participants’ case report form (CRF) and reviewed by the chief investigator. All SAEs will be reported to the sponsor (within 24 h) and REC (within 15 days), where in the opinion of the chief investigator, the event was ‘related’ (as a result of trial procedures) or ‘unexpected’ (not an expected occurrence). SAEs will be recorded in the participants’ CRF. Emergency unblinding as a result of an AE or SAE can take place at any time of day, if required.

Patient and public involvement

The protocol underwent independent review from the local William Harvey Research Institute Peer Review Committee and review by the Queen Mary and Barts Trust Joint Research Management Office (JRMO). In addition, lay persons were invited to comment on the protocol via the NIHR Barts BRC Cardiovascular patient, public advisory group (PPAG). Furthermore, the final study documents, including participant-facing documents, underwent review and interview by the Research Ethics Council (REC) committee that includes lay members.

Monitoring

The trial will be monitored by a Trial Steering Committee (TSC) to assess safety, feasibility, or any other arising problems. This committee will be composed of 3 independent experts in the field of pharmacology, interventional cardiology, and clinical trials, in addition to the investigators, statistician, data monitor, and a lay individual. The TSC will meet routinely during the study at 1-year intervals and will meet upon recruitment of the final participant and at study closure. The day-to-day running of the study will be conducted by the clinical fellow of the study, in conjunction with a member of the research team (clinical research assistant), both of whom report directly to the chief investigator. Representatives of Barts NIHR Cardiovascular BRC PPAG will be included in the Trial Steering Committee to be involved in oversight of the trial.

Dissemination

Primary endpoint data analysis will begin immediately after the last study visit of the last participant. The outcomes and results of this trial will be published according to the CONSORT statement. Trial information will be communicated to the general public via the NIHR Barts Cardiovascular BRC ‘Let’s talk hearts’ seminar series. The results will be published and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. DiNOVasc-COVID-19 has been registered with ClincalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov, identification code NCT04889274).

Discussion

In this randomised-controlled trial, we aim to assess the role of sex on vascular function and inflammatory cell trafficking in response to the COVID-19 vaccination and whether dietary inorganic nitrate alters this response. This will be the first study investigating the role of sex and inorganic nitrate treatment in COVID-19 vaccine-induced endothelial dysfunction and will offer novel mechanistic insights into the potential for dietary nitrate to be used as a therapy to attenuate endothelial injury and inflammatory cell responses after delivery of the COVID-19 vaccine and as a model of COVID-19 itself.

We envisage that the greatest barrier to the completion of this study will be recruitment in the face of a changing infection landscape and government policy regarding vaccination. Whilst there is little that the study team can do to mitigate against these issues a key aspect of the study is the randomisation of volunteers across all groups to ensure unbiased distribution of consented volunteers. Such an approach should ensure that the basic demographics and type of vaccine taken, the changing landscape of COVID-19 will be evenly distributed across the groups.

Trial status

The current protocol version, v2.0 (21/06/2021), was amended from v1.0 with the inclusion of participants for their 2nd and booster vaccines. The first participant was recruited and included in the study in May 2021. Ninety-eight participants have undertaken their screening and second (pre-vaccine/baseline) visit. Six participants are awaiting their COVID-19 vaccine. It is expected that the last participant visit will be undertaken before the end of 2023. The SPIRIT checklist is available in Table 1.

Table 1 SPIRIT checklist. Summary SPIRIT table identifying key components of the study protocol
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

The supplementary material of the final manuscript will contain the full protocol, deidentified dataset, and statistical code.

References

  1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1574–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen R, Liang W, Jiang M, Guan W, Zhan C, et al. Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a nationwide analysis in China. Chest. 2020;158:97–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Bacon S, Bates C, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584:430–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishiga M, Wang DW, Han Y, Lewis DB, Wu JC. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:543–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Babapoor-Farrokhran S, Rasekhi RT, Gill D, Babapoor S, Amanullah A. Arrhythmia in COVID-19. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;9:1430–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu H, Ma F, Wei X, Fang Y. Coronavirus fulminant myocarditis saved with glucocorticoid and human immunoglobulin. Eur Heart J. 2020;42:206.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer P, Degrauwe S, Van Delden C, Ghadri JR, Templin C. Typical takotsubo syndrome triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelham M, Choudry FA, Hamshere S, Beirne AM, Rathod KS, et al. Therapeutic implications of COVID-19 for the interventional cardiologist. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26:203–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hockham C, Linschoten M, Asselbergs FW, Ghossein C, Woodward M, et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular complications and mortality in hospital patients with COVID-19: registry based observational study. BMJ Med. 2023;2:e000245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bienvenu LA, Noonan J, Wang X, Peter K. Higher mortality of COVID-19 in males: sex differences in immune response and cardiovascular comorbidities. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:2197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonaventura A, Vecchie A, Dagna L, Martinod K, Dixon DL, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis as key pathogenic mechanisms in COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:319–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Libby P, Lüscher T. COVID-19 is, in the end, an endothelial disease. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3038–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans PC, Ed Rainger G, Mason JC, Guzik TJ, Osto E, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: a position paper of the ESC Working Group for Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, and the ESC Council of Basic Cardiovascular Science. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;1:2177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander Y, Osto E, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Shechter M, Trifunovic D, et al. Endothelial function in cardiovascular prevision medicine: a position paper on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;1:29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Radomski MW, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Endogenous nitric oxide inhibits human platelet adhesion to vascular endothelium. Lancet. 1987;2:1057–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2002–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E. Nitric oxide signaling in health and disease. Cell. 2022;185:2853–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clapp BR, Hingorani AD, Kharbanda RK, Mohamed-Ali V, Stephens JW, et al. Inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction involves reduced nitric oxide bioavailability and increased oxidant stress. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64:172–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shabbir A, Rathod K, Primus C, Lau C, Chhetri I, et al. Leukocytic nitrate reductase activity mitigates systemic inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans by accelerating resolution. Heart. 2022;108:A167.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kapil V, Khambata RS, Jones DA, Rathod K, Primus C, et al. The noncanonical pathway for in vivo nitric oxide generation: the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72:692–766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ignarro LJ, Fukuto JM, Griscavage JM, Rogers NE, Byrns RE. Oxidation of nitric oxide in aqueous solution to nitrite but not nitrate: comparison with enzymatically formed nitric oxide from L-arginine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8103–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bush PA, Gonzalez NE, Griscavage JM, Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide synthase from cerebellum catalyzes the formation of equimolar quantities of nitric oxide and citrulline from L-arginine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;185:960–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hickson SS, Butlin M, Broad J, Avolio AP, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM. Validity and repeatability of the Vicorder apparatus: a comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Hypertens Res. 2009;32:1079–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Green DJ, Dawson EA, Groenewoud HM, Jones H, Thijssen DH. Is flow-mediated dilation nitric oxide mediated?: a meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2014;63:376–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thijssen DHJ, Bruno RM, van Mil A, Holder SM, Faita F, et al. Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2534–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hingorani AD, Cross J, Kharbanda RK, Mullen MJ, Bhagat K, et al. Acute systemic inflammation impairs endothelium-dependent dilatation in humans. Circulation. 2000;102:994–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rathod KS, Kapil V, Velmurugan S, Khambata RS, Siddique U, et al. Accelerated resolution of inflammation underlies sex differences in inflammatory responses in humans. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:169–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kapil V, Milsom AB, Okorie M, Maleki-Toyserkani S, Akram F, et al. Inorganic nitrate supplementation lowers blood pressure in humans: role for nitrite-derived NO. Hypertension. 2010;56:274–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kapil V, Khambata RS, Robertson A, Caulfield MJ, Ahluwalia A. Dietary nitrate provides sustained blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients: a randomized, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hypertension. 2015;65:320–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gilchrist M, Winyard PG, Aizawa K, Anning C, Shore A, Benjamin N. Effect of dietary nitrate on blood pressure, endothelial function, and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;60:89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wightman EL, Haskell-Ramsay CF, Thompson KG, Blackwell JR, Winyard PG, et al. Dietary nitrate modulates cerebral blood flow parameters and cognitive performance in humans: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover investigation. Physiol Behav. 2015;149:149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work and AS is funded by a William Harvey Foundation Grant. CL, GM, and TG are funded by the Barts Charity Cardiovascular Programme (MRG00913). ND is funded by a BHF 4-year MRes/PhD Studentship (FS/19/62/34901). KSR is funded by a NIHR Clinical Academic Lecturer (2019). IC was funded by the NIHR CRN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Barts and The London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK

    Asad Shabbir, Ismita Chhetri, Rayomand S. Khambata, Tipparat Parakaw, Clement Lau, Muhammad A. B. N. Aubdool, Gianmichele Massimo, Nicki Dyson, Vikas Kapil, Thomas Godec, Vanessa Apea, Krishnaraj S. Rathod & Amrita Ahluwalia

  2. Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

    Asad Shabbir, Clement Lau & Krishnaraj S. Rathod

  3. Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK

    Jan Flint & Chloe Orkin

Authors
  1. Asad Shabbir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ismita Chhetri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rayomand S. Khambata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tipparat Parakaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clement Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad A. B. N. Aubdool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gianmichele Massimo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nicki Dyson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vikas Kapil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thomas Godec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vanessa Apea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jan Flint
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Chloe Orkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Krishnaraj S. Rathod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Amrita Ahluwalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors listed above fulfil all three International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines for authorship, which are (1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis, and interpretation of data; (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (3) final approval of the version to be published. AS: methodology, investigation, project administration, and writing—drafting the original manuscript. IC: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. RSK: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. TP: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. CL: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. MABNA: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. GM: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. ND: methodology and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. VK: methodology and revising the draft manuscript. TG: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—revising of the draft manuscript. VP: methodology and revising the draft manuscript. JF: methodology and revising the draft manuscript. CO: methodology and revising the draft manuscript. KSR: methodology, supervision, and revising the draft manuscript. AA: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, supervision, writing of the original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing of the final document. All authors approved the final version of this paper for submission. This study is supported by the CVCTU, a branch of the Barts CTU UKCRC reg no. 4.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrita Ahluwalia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Queen Mary and Barts Trust Joint Research Management Office (JRMO) reviewed this protocol prior to submission to the Research Ethics Committee (REC). The study protocol and any subsequent amendments, along with materials provided to participants and advertising material, were submitted to South Central – Oxford C REC. The study is performed in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the REC (South Central – Oxford C, 21/SC/0154). Written, informed consent to participate has been and will continue to be obtained from all participants by appropriately trained study team members according to the delegation log. Consent will be acquired for the collection of biological samples to perform exploratory analyses. Biological samples will be stored in − 80° freezers, in secured units.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Prof. Ahluwalia is a co-director of Heartbeet Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Participant consent form.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shabbir, A., Chhetri, I., Khambata, R.S. et al. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled parallel study to investigate the effect of sex and dietary nitrate on COVID-19 vaccine-induced vascular dysfunction in healthy men and women: protocol of the DiNOVasc-COVID-19 study. Trials 24, 593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07616-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07616-2

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215