Skip to main content

Effects of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation in the sacral nerve in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity after suprasacral spinal cord injury: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is a serious and common complication after spinal cord injury, affecting patients’ quality of life seriously. Therefore, we developed this research protocol to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation (rFMS) in the sacral nerve in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) after suprasacral spinal cord injury (SCI) and provide more options for rFMS in treating NDO after suprasacral SCI.

Methods

This study is a single-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. We will recruit the patients with NDO after suprasacral SCI in the Rehabilitation Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from September 2022 to August 2023. They will be assigned to the rFMS group and the sham stimulation group randomly. The sample size is 66, with 33 patients in each group. The rFMS group will receive real rFMS treatment of the sacral nerve (100% stimulation intensity, 5 Hz, 20 min each time, five times a week), and the sham group will receive sham stimulation. Both groups will receive similar treatment strategies, including medication, standard urine management, acupuncture treatment, and health education. The bladder compliance (bladder capacity/detrusor pressure) and pudendal nerve electromyography will be evaluated at baseline, 8th week of treatment. The residual volume of the bladder and bladder diary will be recorded once a week during 8 weeks of treatments. SCI-QOL and NBSS will be evaluated at baseline, the 4th and 8th week of treatment. In addition, the above assessments will be followed up at 8 weeks after the end of treatment.

Discussion

It is expected that the bladder function, symptoms, and quality of life might be significantly improved after rFMS of the sacral nerve.

Trial registration

The China Clinical Trials Registry has approved this study, registration number: ChiCTR2100045148. Registered on April 7, 2021.

Peer Review reports

Administrative information

Note: the numbers in curly brackets in this protocol refer to SPIRIT checklist item numbers. The order of the items has been modified to group similar items (see http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/).

Title (1)

Effects of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation in the sacral nerve in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity after suprasacral spinal cord injury: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration {2a and 2b}.

The China Clinical Trials Registry has approved this study, registration number: ChiCTR2100045148.

Protocol version (2)

Version 2 of 26–10-2022

Funding (2)

This work will be supported by School-level scientific research project of Southwest Medical University No. 2021ZKQN042, Southwest Medical University Youth Science and Technology Talents Cultivation Program No. 00160273, Sichuan Provincial Cadre Health Research Project No. chuanganyan 2021–1505. Funders have no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing.

Author details (3)

Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China.

Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b}

Jiyang Li, MSc. E-mail: 849215633@qq.com

Jianxiong Wang, Ph.D. E-mail: jianxiongwang_swmu@126.com

Yue Hu, MSc. Email: 547955626@qq.com

Rui Jian, MSc. Email: 13982750867@163.com

Yulu Zhao, B.S. E-mail:563144343@qq.com

Dan Li, MSc. E-mail: 947037100@qq.com

Tenggang Wan, B.S. E-mail: 350303280@qq.com

Wuga Jike, B.S. E-mail: 1772692885@qq.com

Fangyuan Xu, MSc. ** E-mail: x5144@163.com

Maomao Huang, MSc. ** E-mail: 973342240@qq.com.

Role of sponsor {5c}

JL and MH designed the protocol and drafted the manuscript. J-XW, FX and YH received project funding and consulted during the research. RJ and DL are physicians recruiting patients. TW is a physical therapist who uses rFMS to treat patients with NDO. YZ is responsible for baseline assessment and follow-up. JW is a research assistant for the project and is responsible for data collection and analysis. All authors have commented on drafts of this paper and have read and approved this final manuscript.

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a}

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is recognized when detrusor overactivity accompanies a relevant neurological condition [1]. As a type of neurogenic bladder (NB), NDO is quite common in patients with suprasacral spinal cord injury (SCI). NDO can lead to intermittent increases in intravesical pressure and urine leakage [2]. Untreated NDO can lead to many complications, such as recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary calculi, and urethral strictures, which seriously affect the patient’s quality of life [3]. Currently, interventions for NDO include medicine, acupuncture, sacral neuromodulation, peripheral tibial nerve stimulation, pelvic floor muscle function training, and surgical intervention [4,5,6]. Functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) is a non-invasive treatment for NDO that has emerged in recent years. Investigators have observed a well-tolerated treatment of stress urinary incontinence with no pain or side effects by placing the therapeutic coils flatly on the sacrum (S2–S4), resulting in an electromagnetic impact [7]. Previous studies have shown that magnetic stimulation might effectively treat NB [5, 8, 9]. However, these articles were observational studies or small sample studies. There is a lack of high-quality research on repetitive functional magnetic stimulation (rFMS) of sacral nerves in the treatment of NDO secondary to suprasacral SCI. Therefore, we developed this research to evaluate the efficacy of rFMS in the sacral nerve in patients with NDO after suprasacral SCI and provide more options for rFMS in treating NDO.

Objectives {7}

  1. 1.

    To evaluate the efficacy of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation (rFMS) in the sacral nerve in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) after suprasacral spinal cord injury (SCI)

  2. 2.

    To provide more options for rFMS in treating NDO after suprasacral SCI.

Trial design {8}

This study will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and sign the informed consent form will be randomly divided into the rFMS group and sham rFMS group (sham group) in a 1:1 ratio. Assessments are made before treatment, during 8 weeks treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment (Fig. 1). The purpose of this study is to design a high-quality randomized controlled trial and realize the complete randomization of participants. The patients, professional evaluators, and data analysts are all blinded, so as to provide reliable data for the recovery of bladder function of suprasacral SCI with NDO after rFMS treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Summary of study protocol

Methods: participants, interventions, and outcomes

Study setting {9}

All the patients will come from the Rehabilitation Medicine Department, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. Patients are considered for inclusion if they meet the criteria as defined below.

Eligibility criteria {10}

The inclusion criteria are as follows: definitely diagnosed as suprasacral SCI [10], the course of the disease is more than one month; age: 18–60 years old; urodynamics indicates NDO [11]. The exclusion criteria are as follows: patients with metal implants in the lumbosacral area; patients with cognitive dysfunction who cannot cooperate; patients with unstable vital signs; those who have a history of botulinum toxin injection within 6 months or a history of bladder/sphincter surgery; patients with unstable fractures who cannot complete urodynamics. Once patients are enrolled, we will use questionnaires to record participants’ baseline data such as age, gender, symptoms, duration, past treatments (including medications and rehabilitation), and more.

Who will take informed consent? {26a}

Patients with NDO will be screened for eligibility to participate in this study based on the abovementioned criteria. patients assessed as qualified by the treatment group are invited to meet with the research physician to discuss any remaining questions and sign the informed consent.

Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}

In the consent form, participants will be asked if they agree to use of their data when they choose to withdraw from the trial. Participants will also be asked for permission for the research team to share relevant data with people from the Universities taking part in the research or from regulatory authorities, where relevant. This trial does not involve collecting biological specimens for storage.

Interventions

Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}

The sham group will receive sham rFMS stimulation and medication, standard urine management, acupuncture treatment, and health education.

Intervention description {11a}

The rFMS group will receive real rFMS treatment of the sacral nerve, while the sham group will receive sham stimulation. Both groups will receive similar treatment strategies, including medication, standard urine management, acupuncture treatment, and health education.

rFMS and sham stimulation

All magnetic stimulation treatments will be performed by an experienced rehabilitation therapist specializing in neurorehabilitation for over 5 years. For the rFMS group, the patient takes the prone position and aligns the centers of the two circular magnetic coils with the third sacral nerve (S3) holes on both sides (the upper edge of the sacrum and the midpoint of the coccyx connect one lateral finger on the left and right sides). For the first treatment, motor thresholds will be measured with single-pulse stimulation. The parameters of rFMS treatment will be as follows: the stimulation intensity will be 100%; the frequency will be 5 Hz; 20 min each time, five times a week, for 8 consecutive weeks. Simultaneously, the sham group will use a sham coil, which will not generate a magnetic field but has a similar appearance and sound during operation. The frequency and treatment time will be the same as in the rFMS group, except that the coil does not generate a magnetic field.

Medication

According to relevant guidelines [12], each patient will receive tolterodine with a dose of 2 mg twice a day.

Bladder management strategy

For bladder emptying, the individualized management strategy is selected according to the patient’s condition, mainly including indwelling catheterization and intermittent catheterization, with the frequency determined according to residual urine.

Acupuncture treatment

Acupuncture treatment will be performed by an experienced traditional Chinese medicine doctor who has been in acupuncture for more than 5 years. Select Tianshu, Guanyuan, Qihai, Sanyinjiao, Yinlingquan, and other acupoints to clean and disinfect each point; then acupuncture the acupoints, and leave the needle for 30 min. The acupuncture will be conducted once a day, five times a week, for 8 weeks.

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}

There will be no pre-defined criteria for stopping or modifying the allocated intervention. Participation is voluntary. Participants may withdraw from the voluntary trial at any time for any specific reason. Withdrawal from participation has no negative consequences or adverse effects on participants. Researchers may also terminate participation if serious adverse events occur during the intervention. We will suggest that patients who withdraw from the trial continue to standardize the treatment of NDO, so that their subsequent normal medical care will not be affected.

Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}

Encourage adherence to treatment through weekly evaluations and psychological intervention by experienced psychologists when necessary. Strategies may include encouragement and setting specific goals and dates for weekly physical and drug therapy. The whole process of rFMS treatment will be supervised by an experienced rehabilitation therapist specializing in neurorehabilitation in our center.

Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}

All participants will receive medication, standard urine management, acupuncture treatment, and health education. Health education is an organized, planned, and implemented educational activity. It assists individuals and groups in acquiring knowledge about health care, establishing health ideas, and voluntarily embracing educational activities supportive of healthy habits and lifestyles through information dissemination and behavioral intervention. Health education about NDO includes the rationale for bladder emptying options, drinking water plans, prevention of urinary tract infections, etc.

Provisions for post-trial care {30}

In the event of study-related damage or injuries, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University shall provide free symptomatic treatment. If the injury is serious, invite relevant experts for treatment and provide medical compensation.

Outcomes {12}

Primary outcome

The primary outcome is the bladder compliance measured by urodynamic testing. Bladder compliance is the relationship between a change in bladder capacity and a change in detrusor pressure (Pdet) [13]. Urodynamic examinations will be performed by the same experienced technician who has been performing urodynamic examinations for more than 5 years. The detection steps are as follows: The day before the examination, the patient is given a glycerin enema to clear up dry stools. The skin around the anus and perineum is prepared, and pubic hair is removed if necessary. On the day of the examination, the patient is placed in a supine position, the genital area is routinely disinfected, sterile towels are applied, and a 6F double-lumen manometry catheter is inserted into the bladder through the urethra and will be fixed with tape (penis for males, perineal for females). Insert an 8F balloon catheter into the rectum, inject an appropriate amount of fluid into the balloon of the rectal catheter, and place it in the patient’s rectum to a depth of about 10 cm. During the measurement, the patient will take the lithotomy position. And the normal saline will fill the bladder with a perfusion rate of 50 ml/min by using a water pump. The patient will be told to cough before the start of perfusion to suppress the urge to urinate during perfusion, to cough again before the end of the assay, and to report when the patient feels the first urge to urinate and feels that the maximum cystometry volume been reached. Measure and record using the sensor-related indicators. Obtain bladder compliance, abdominal pressure (Pabd), intravesical pressure (Pves), Pdet, urine flow rate (Q), and other indicators. Safe bladder capacity refers to the bladder capacity when the bladder pressure reaches 40 cmH2O or occurring urine leakage in the filling period [14]. And the Pdet will be measured in the urodynamic tests described above.

Secondary outcomes

The secondary outcome indicators include the residual volume of the bladder, the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life, bladder diary, Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, and pudendal nerve electromyography. Besides objective indicators, those outcomes can also reflect the effect of rFMS on NDO-associated symptoms and the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL).

Participants with partially voluntary voiding function will be taken bladder residual urine measurements immediately after voiding once a week. Each measurement will scan the bladder in the sagittal and transverse planes. The probe is located on the midline above the symphysis pubis to obtain a sagittal view of the lower abdomen. When the largest picture of the bladder appears on the screen, freeze the image and measure the height (h), depth (d), and cross-sectional area (AS) of the bladder. Then place the probe laterally above the symphysis pubis, at right angles to the sagittal plane, and provide another part of the lower abdomen. When the largest picture appears on the screen, freeze the image and measure the width (w), depth (d), and cross-sectional area (AT) of the bladder. According to previous studies [15], the residual volume is approximately equal to the cross-sectional area of the bladder when measured in the sagittal plane multiplied by the width of the bladder.

SCI-QOL measurement system will assess the quality of life. It includes four aspects: physical health, emotional health, social participation, and physical function [16]. Each aspect has 3–6 sub-items, which can comprehensively evaluate patients’ physical and psychological functions with SCI. SCI-QOL will evaluate the patients at the time of evaluation, and the results will be recorded.

The bladder diary will measure the frequency of acute urinary incontinence, which can reflect the frequency of urinary incontinence and quantify bladder symptoms [17]. Patients will record the frequency of acute urinary incontinence weekly for 8 weeks of the entire trial and during follow-up.

The pudendal nerve and subsacral motor neuron involvement are significantly associated with chronic SCI [18]. Electromyogram (EMG) is the muscle bioelectric pattern recorded with an electromyography instrument. It can evaluate the function of nerves. Studies [19] have found that pudendal nerve stimulation can cause reflex bladder contraction in patients with chronic SCI, which indicates that the function of the pudendal nerve is related to bladder function and can be used to evaluate bladder function. In our study, quantitative external anal sphincter (EAS) muscle electromyography (EMG), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) testing, pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials (PSEP), and bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) will be measured [20]. The resting and light exertion EMG of EAS will be detected by using concentric needle electrodes [21]. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency will be recorded by finger cuff electrodes [22]. For pudendal nerve PSEP, the P40 latency will be measured by the recording electrode placing in Cz (active electrode), while the stimulation electrode will be placed in the pubic symphysis [23]. For BCR, mean latency values will be recorded by concentric needle electrodes [24]. Specifically, the patient will be first placed in the lithotomy position, and then the BCR will be elicited by rapidly pressing down on the glans with the probe. Electrodes will be placed around the anus and on the inner thighs at the 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock positions to capture the electrical activity generated by this reflex. Pressure from the probe against the glans generates the initial stimulus waveform. This will be followed by a second elevated waveform or contraction in response to the BCR. Latency will be calculated based on the time between these two events.

Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) evaluates patients’ symptoms with NB from three dimensions urinary incontinence, storage and urination, and outcome. It is an effective and comprehensive tool for assessing NB symptoms in patients with SCI [25]. NBSS includes three dimensions of urinary incontinence, storage, urination, and outcome, with 24 items, of which two are unscored. The first item is classified according to the patient’s bladder management, and the last item is the patient’s bladder management. The overall quality of life assessment assesses the patient’s urination pattern and quality of life. Each item is worth 0 ~ 3 points or 0 ~ 4 points. The scale’s total score is 74 points, with higher scores indicating more obvious NB symptoms.

Participant timeline {13}

Before starting the intervention, participant baseline data will be collected, as well as bladder capacity and Pdet measured by urodynamic testing, the residual volume of the bladder, quality of life, bladder diary, NBSS, and pudendal nerve electromyography. After that, interventions will be performed five times a week for 8 consecutive weeks. The bladder compliance (bladder capacity/Pdet) and pudendal nerve electromyography will be evaluated at baseline, 8th week of treatment. The residual volume of the bladder and bladder diary will be recorded once a week during 8 weeks of treatments. SCI-QOL and NBSS will be evaluated at baseline, the 4th and 8th week of treatment. In addition, the above assessments will be followed up at 8 weeks after the end of treatment. The participant timeline is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedules for follow-up assessments and data collection

Sample size {14}

Sample size was calculated using bladder compliance as the main outcome. According to the analysis of previous research results [12, 26], bladder compliance change after therapy of 8 ml per cm H2O with a standard deviation of 9 ml per cm H2O was used in the calculation. Assuming that the standardized effect size is 0.25, the probability of type I error is 5%, and the probability of avoiding type II error is 90%, the trial requires at least 26 participants in each group. Considering the allowable 20% dropout rate, approximately 33 patients per group will eventually be needed.

Recruitment {15}

We will recruit patients through publication and distribution of posters and leaflets containing information of the study. Most of the patients are from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. If the number of patients in rehabilitation medicine cannot meet the required number of participants in our experiment, we will continue to recruit patients with NDO referred by neurosurgery, urology, and other departments until recruitment is completed. The official start of recruitment was on 01 September 2022.

Assignment of interventions: allocation

Sequence generation {16a}

The random allocation table will be generated by SPSS 23.0 software, and the included cases will be randomly divided into treatment and control groups. The research coordinator is responsible for randomization, which will be carried out by simple 1: 1 draw (for each pair of patients who are recruited).

Concealment mechanism {16b}

The random allocation table will be sealed in duplicate in an opaque envelope and stored in the third party and the main research unit, respectively. After the clinical trial is over and all the case report forms are double-checked by the participating clinical treatment units, evaluation units, and third parties, the data will be finally locked.

Implementation {16c}

Randomization will be implemented by a research assistant who is not involved in the trial in any form. After ensuring patients fulfill inclusion criteria and informed consent forms are obtained from them, the envelopes are opened by the rehabilitation therapist specializing in rFMS and rFMS treatment is carried out.

Assignment of interventions: blinding

Who will be blinded {17a}

All of the trial participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts will be blinded after assignment to interventions. They only know the patient number and they don't know the specific group of patients.

Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}

Unblinding will be allowed under emergencies such as the incidence of serious adverse effects.

Data collection and management

Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}

Urodynamic examinations will be performed by the same experienced technician who has been performing urodynamic examinations for more than 5 years. The residual volume of the bladder, the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life, Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, and pudendal nerve electromyography will be conducted by professional evaluators. The bladder diary comes from patient records.

All researchers, including the rFMS therapist, outcome assessors, data collectors, data managers, and statisticians, will undergo training before the experiment. All data will be anonymized and saved in an encryption study folder and only the study team has access to this study folder.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}

The importance of completion of the treatment and follow-up assessment will be stressed. Patients are allowed to stop the experiment at any time during the study. If possible, the patient will be asked to complete the follow-up assessments at 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Throughout the study period, the researchers will keep in close contact with the participants if necessary.

Data management {19}

The epidata (version 4.6) will be used to manage data. After finishing all the assessments, data will be checked by trained personnel and two people will be both processing data to ensure data accuracy.

Confidentiality {27}

All data will be stored on the local server of the Rehabilitation Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. All data, including personal data collected, will be kept strictly confidential.

Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation, and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}

There are no plans for collection and evaluation of biological specimens in this study.

Statistical methods

Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}

We will use SPSS 23.0 statistical software for data analysis with a statistical significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. We will apply the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test to analyze categorical data such as symptoms or gender. Data that is not normally distributed will be analyzed using nonparametric analysis. In addition, repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc tests will be used to analyze statistically significant differences between and within the groups.

Interim analyses {21b}

No interim analyses are planned.

Methods for additional analyses (e.g., subgroup analyses) {20b}

No additional analyses are planned.

Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}

In this study, we plan to perform an intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and a per-protocol analysis (PP). Consistent results will help determine the conclusions of the study. If inconsistent, we will do further analysis and discussion. Furthermore, we will do our best to reduce missing data. We will use a modal mixture model to fill in the missing outcome data if data is missing.

Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant-level data and statistical code {31c}

The datasets during the current study and statistical code are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, as is the full protocol.

Oversight and monitoring

Composition of the coordinating center and trial steering committee {5d}

The study will be monitored by an independent internal monitor. The direct test group responsible for trial management, routine activities, and intervention management will meet biweekly. The broader team, which includes rehabilitation physicians, rehabilitation nurses, and rehabilitation therapists, will meet every month. The study investigators will be responsible for monitoring and managing data quality, assessing completeness and accuracy of data collection, implementation and adherence to the study protocol, and assessment of outcomes.

Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}

Because our single-center trial is small, involved few researchers and has no external funding, there are no need for an additional data monitoring committee.

Adverse event reporting and harms {22}

Adverse events will be collected and monitored by professionals. Any adverse events that occur during the trial (for example, worsening symptoms and psychological disturbances) will be classified as adverse events. All adverse events will be discussed weekly regarding causality and severity, and further action may be taken based on the results.

Frequency and plans for auditing trial conduct {23}

The Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University is the Trial Steering Committee and will supervise the trial, and the committee will meet every year.

Plans for communicating important protocol amendments to relevant parties (e.g., trial participants, ethical committees) {25}

If any protocol needs to be modified, the Court’s Ethics Committee will review it again and, upon approval, update the trial registry and protocol. Any violation of the protocol will be fully documented using the Violation Report form.

Dissemination plans {31a}

The results will be communicated via journal publications or conference presentations. If participants are interested in the results of the trial, they will be notified at the end of the trial.

Discussion

This study will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to investigate the effect of rFMS in the sacral nerve on NDO after SCI. Bladder function, symptoms, and SCI-QOL are the main observation objects of our study. The intervention and follow-up time will last 8 weeks, respectively, to observe the short-term efficacy of rFMS, which will lay a foundation for further research.

As the most common type of NB, the routine treatment of NDO mainly includes anticholinergic drugs, botulinum toxin injection, acupuncture, and surgical treatments [2, 27]. However, these conventional treatments also have some limitations, including side effects and poor compliance [27]. For example, anticholinergic drugs may produce arrhythmias, visual blurring, xerostomia, and constipation. Botulinum toxin injection might alter the bladder sensory system, which will shorten its effectiveness [28]. Most surgical managements are invasive operations and are only considered in cases of severe bladder contracture due to NDO. Hence, safe nonpharmacological and nonoperative therapies those may be effective in treating NDO have attracted the attention of researchers. In recent years, Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques have emerged as new treatments, such as Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, and FMS of sacral nerves. rTMS represents a potentially valuable treatment for neurogenic urinary disturbances by inducing a long-lasting modulation of spinal cord excitability [29]. Centonze found that 5-Hz rTMS in the motor cortex produces desirable effects on the voiding phase during the micturition cycle in patients with multiple sclerosis, indicating that rTMS enhanced corticospinal tract excitability to facilitate detrusor contraction and/or urethral sphincter relaxation [30]. Some studies showed that transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation might effectively improve urodynamics parameters and alter the course of SCI with NB via neuromodulation in the short term [31, 32]. It has been shown that repetitive lumbosacral nerve magnetic stimulation at 15 Hz may improve urinary dysfunction secondary to lumbosacral nerve injury [33]. Tetsuyuki Fujishiro found that rFMS of the sacral roots may be helpful in controlling urinary frequency and urge incontinence [34]. Po-Yi Tsai has confirmed the efficacy of 5-Hz sacral FMS in decreasing stress urinary incontinence [35]. Bycroft found that sacral rFMS might inhibit detrusor contraction by “rebound” effect in NDO and had not stimulated preganglionic parasympathetic to induce bladder contractions [6]. But the sample size was too small, and outcome assessment was undetailed in this study. Lamyaa A found that the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients with NDO were better than TENS according to the urodynamics outcome [8]. However, this study only used urodynamics to evaluate the bladder function and did not use blinding. T Yamanishi found that the inhibition of detrusor overactivity appeared more significant in the magnetic stimulation group than in the electrical stimulation group [36]. But the outcome was evaluated only by bladder capacity, and no follow-up was conducted to observe its effect in the research. So, there is a lack of high-quality research on sacral rFMS in treating NDO secondary to suprasacral SCI. And the review suggested that a high-quality randomized controlled trial about neuro-regulation in the treatment of NB might be needed [37]. Thus, we designed a stricter study to explore the efficacy and safety of rFMS in treating NDO with sham rFMS as a comparison. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this will be the first double-blind study on rFMS to treat NDO. Moreover, we will also use subjective and objective outcomes to obverse its effects.

In terms of outcome evaluation, besides subjective assessment methods such as bladder diary, SCI-QOL questionnaire, and NBSS, we will also use objective assessments, including urodynamics and pudendal nerve electromyography. Urodynamics assessments are the primary basis for evaluating NB, including bladder capacity, urinary flowmetry, bladder cystometry, electromyogram, Valsalva leak point pressure, and detrusor leak point pressure [27]. Video urodynamics combines voiding cystourethrography with multichannel urodynamics to provide the most comprehensive assessment of bladder function in patients with SCI. When vesicoureteral reflux occurs, it is also possible to record the volume and pressure at which the reflux started [38]. Urodynamic diagnoses, such as NDO, impaired compliance, and reduced bladder capacity, can identify a patient with a potentially higher risk of urological complications as one of the essential indicators of urodynamics, the duration of the NDO contraction may also predict renal deterioration [4].

The changes in pudendal innervation are closely related to NB filling symptoms and detrusor overactivity [39]. There are two different pathological mechanisms of NDO secondary to SCI: increased afferent signaling and abnormal handling of efferent activity [28]. The high center lost its inhibitory effect on the low center after suprasacral SCI. Suprasacral SCI releases the spinal cord segmental micturition reflex from supraspinal modulation and increases the injury-induced release of bladder neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial‐derived neurotrophic factor, and ciliary neurotrophic factor. These neurotrophic factors promote Na + channel activation and K + channel deactivation, which subsequently increase the hyperexcitability of the dorsal root ganglion neurons innervating the urinary bladder and activate hypermechanosensitive C‐fiber bladder wall afferents [40,41,42]. rFMS of the sacral nerve can improve NDO symptoms by different pathways. The excitatory impulses produced by magnetic stimulation ascending to the thoracolumbar sympathetic neurons can excite the sympathetic nerve and inhibit the parasympathetic nerve, thus decreasing detrusor pressure [43]. Stimulation of the sacral nerve might induce an interneuronal change in the spinal reflex arc or spinobulbospinal reflex arc to inhibit the activity of the dominant C-fibers in neurological injury [44]. Therefore, it is meaningful to record pudendal nerve evoked potentials. At present, many studies have used urodynamics or electrophysiological examination of the pudendal nerve to evaluate sacral nerve implantation electrodes for regulating the NB [45,46,47,48]. This is a clinical trial, and we will not explore its specific mechanism further. But we will also measure the pudendal nerve evoked potential as one of the outcomes. At the same time, NDO will seriously affect patients’ quality of life. Therefore, we will use subjective assessments (bladder diary, SCI-QOL questionnaire, NBSS) and objective assessments (urodynamics, pudendal nerve electromyography) to evaluate the efficacy of sacral nerve rFMS in the treatment of NDO after SCI.

Our study will have some limitations. First, we will only enroll patients with suprasacral SCI, so the conclusion of our study may be suitable for patients with NDO after suprasacral SCI. Other studies are needed to observe the efficacy in treating NB after subsacral SCI. Second, the follow-up of this trial will be only 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of follow-up, we will decide whether to continue the follow-up according to the patients’ wishes.

Trial status

This publication is based on version 1 of the rFMS protocol dated 01 January 2022. The official start of recruitment was on 01 September 2022. The estimated end date of the trial is 31 August 2023 and recruitment of patients is ongoing.

Availability of data and materials {29}

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NDO:

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity

rFMS:

Repetitive functional magnetic stimulation

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

SCI-QOL:

Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life

NBSS:

Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score

Pabd:

Abdominal pressure

Pves:

Intravesical pressure

Pdet:

Detrusor pressure

EAS:

External anal sphincter

EMG:

Muscle electromyography

PNTML:

Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency

PSEP:

Pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials

BCR:

Bulbocavernosus reflex

References

  1. terminologyICSCoSo. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Fourth report: neuromuscular dysfunction. International Continence Society Committee on Standardization of Terminology. Urology. 1981;17(6):618–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu HZ, Granger N, Jeffery ND. Pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction caused by suprasacral spinal cord injury. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30(5):1575–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayat M, Kumar V, Denis M, Webb J, Gregory A, Mehrmohammadi M, et al. Correlation of ultrasound bladder vibrometry assessment of bladder compliance with urodynamic study results. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kavanagh A, Baverstock R, Campeau L, Carlson K, Cox A, Hickling D, et al. Canadian Urological Association guideline: diagnosis, management, and surveillance of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction - executive summary. Cuaj-Can Urol Assoc. 2019;13(6):156–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bycroft JA, Craggs MD, Sheriff M, Knight S, Shah PJ. Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots cause contraction or suppression of the bladder? Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(3):241–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vecchio M, Chiaramonte R, Di Benedetto P. Management of bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies regarding bladder rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehab Med. 2022;58(3):387-96.

  7. Manganotti P, Zaina F, Vedovi E, Pistoia L, Rubilotta E, D’Amico A, et al. Repetitive magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots for the treatment of stress incontinence: a brief report. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(3):339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fergany LA, Shaker H, Arafa M, Elbadry MS. Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder? Arab J Urol. 2017;15(2):148–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. But I, Faganelj M, Sostaric A. Functional magnetic stimulation for mixed urinary incontinence. J urology. 2005;173(5):1644–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sekido N, Igawa Y, Kakizaki H, Kitta T, Sengoku A, Takahashi S, et al. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. Int j urol. 2020;27(4):276–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R, et al. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur urol. 2016;69(2):324–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watanabe M, Yamanishi T, Honda M, Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Yoshida K. Efficacy of extended-release tolterodine for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity and/or low-compliance bladder. Int J Urol. 2010;17(11):931–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen H, Xie K, Jiang C. A single-blind randomized control trial of trigonal versus nontrigonal Botulinum toxin-A injections for patients with urinary incontinence and poor bladder compliance secondary to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(5):757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagerty JA, Richards I, Kaplan WE. Intravesical electrotherapy for neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a 22-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1680–3; discussion 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kjeldsen-Kragh J. Measurement of residual urine volume by means of ultrasonic scanning: a comparative study. Paraplegia. 1988;26(3):192–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(3):257–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghei M, Malone-Lee J. Using the circumstances of symptom experience to assess the severity of urgency in the overactive bladder. J Urol. 2005;174(3):972–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tankisi H, Pugdahl K, Rasmussen MM, Clemmensen D, Rawashdeh YF, Christensen P, et al. Pelvic floor electrophysiology in spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(5):2319–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo PB, Klein SM, Grafstein NH, Horvath EE, Amundsen CL, Webster GD, et al. Pudendal nerve stimulation evokes reflex bladder contractions in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(7):1020–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Enck P, Vodusek DB. Electromyography of pelvic floor muscles. J electromyogr kines. 2006;16(6):568–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Podnar S. Sphincter electromyography and the penilo-cavernosus reflex: are both necessary? Neurourol urodynam. 2008;27(8):813–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Brit j surg. 1984;71(8):614–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sau GF, Aiello I, Siracusano S, Belgrano M, Pastorino M, Balsamo P, et al. Pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in probable multiple sclerosis. Ital j neurol sci. 1997;18(5):289–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laudano MA, Chughtai B, Lee RK, Seklehner S, Elterman D, Kaplan SA, et al. Use of the Bulbocavernosus reflex system in assessing voiding dysfunction. World j urol. 2013;31(6):1459–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Welk B, Morrow S, Madarasz W, Baverstock R, Macnab J, Sequeira K. The validity and reliability of the neurogenic bladder symptom score. J Urol. 2014;192(2):452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee YH, Kim SH, Kim JM, Im HT, Choi IS, Lee KW. The effect of semiconditional dorsal penile nerve electrical stimulation on capacity and compliance of the bladder with deformity in spinal cord injury patients: a pilot study. Spinal cord. 2012;50(4):289–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taweel WA, Seyam R. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Res Rep Urol. 2015;7:85–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Traini C, Vannucchi MG. The Botulinum treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity: the double-face of the neurotoxin. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(11):614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bäumer T, Lange R, Liepert J, Weiller C, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC, et al. Repeated premotor rTMS leads to cumulative plastic changes of motor cortex excitability in humans. Neuroimage. 2003;20(1):550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Centonze D, Petta F, Versace V, Rossi S, Torelli F, Prosperetti C, et al. Effects of motor cortex rTMS on lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13(2):269–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamboonlert K, Panyasriwanit S, Tantisiriwat N, Kitisomprayoonkul W. Effects of bilateral transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injury: a urodynamic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(6):1165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stampas A, Korupolu R, Zhu L, Smith CP, Gustafson K. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in acute spinal cord injury neurogenic bladder: a randomized control pilot trial. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(6):716–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khedr EM, Alkady EA, El-Hammady DH, Khalifa FA, bin-Humam S. Repetitive lumbosacral nerve magnetic stimulation improves bladder dysfunction due to lumbosacral nerve injury: a pilot randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):570–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fujishiro T, Takahashi S, Enomoto H, Ugawa Y, Ueno S, Kitamura T. Magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots for the treatment of urinary frequency and urge incontinence: an investigational study and placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2002;168(3):1036–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsai PY, Wang CP, Hsieh CY, Tsai YA, Yeh SC, Chuang TY. Long-term sacral magnetic stimulation for refractory stress urinary incontinence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(12):2231–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamanishi T, Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Suda S, Hattori T, Ito H, et al. Comparative study of the effects of magnetic versus electrical stimulation on inhibition of detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2000;56(5):777–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nardone R, Versace V, Sebastianelli L, Brigo F, Golaszewski S, Christova M, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and bladder function: a systematic review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(11):2032–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nosseir M, Hinkel A, Pannek J. Clinical usefulness of urodynamic assessment for maintenance of bladder function in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(2):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vírseda Chamorro M, Salinas-Casado J, Zarza-Luciañez D, Méndez-Rubio S, Pelaquim H, Esteban-Fuertes M. Participation of the pudendal innervation in the detrusor overactivity of the detrusor and in the overactive bladder syndrome. Actas Urol Esp. 2012;36(1):37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. de Groat WC, Yoshimura N. Plasticity in reflex pathways to the lower urinary tract following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2012;235(1):123–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoshimura N, de Groat WC. Plasticity of Na+ channels in afferent neurones innervating rat urinary bladder following spinal cord injury. J Physiol. 1997;503 (Pt 2)(Pt 2):269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoshimura N, White G, Weight FF, de Groat WC. Different types of Na+ and A-type K+ currents in dorsal root ganglion neurones innervating the rat urinary bladder. J Physiol. 1996;494 (Pt 1)(Pt 1):1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Niu T, Bennett CJ, Keller TL, Leiter JC, Lu DC. A proof-of-concept study of transcutaneous magnetic spinal cord stimulation for neurogenic bladder. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12549.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim JW, Kim MJ, Noh JY, Lee HY, Han SW. Extracorporeal pelvic floor magnetic stimulation in children with voiding dysfunction. BJU Int. 2005;95(9):1310–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chartier-Kastler EJ, Ruud Bosch JL, Perrigot M, Chancellor MB, Richard F, Denys P. Long-term results of sacral nerve stimulation (S3) for the treatment of neurogenic refractory urge incontinence related to detrusor hyperreflexia. J Urol. 2000;164(5):1476–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wöllner J, Krebs J, Pannek J. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(2):137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Groen J, Ruud Bosch JL, van Mastrigt R. Sacral neuromodulation in women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity incontinence: decreased overactivity but unchanged bladder contraction strength and urethral resistance during voiding. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):1005–9; discussion 9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Parnell BA, Howard JF Jr, Geller EJ. The effect of sacral neuromodulation on pudendal nerve function and female sexual function. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(5):456–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of the rFMS research group for their support. They thank all study participants for their participation in this trial.

Patient and public involvement

In the trial phase, the feedback of the participants on the whole intervention will be collected to improve the study protocol. We will eventually inform the participants and the public on the follow-up reports.

Funding

This work was supported by the school-level scientific research project of Southwest Medical University No. 2021ZKQN042, Southwest Medical University Youth Science and Technology Talents Cultivation Program No. 00160273, Sichuan Provincial Cadre Health Research Project No. chuanganyan 2021–1505. Funders have no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JL and MH designed the protocol and drafted the manuscript. J-XW, FX, and YH received project funding and consulted during the research. RJ and DL are physicians recruiting patients. TW is a physical therapist who uses rFMS to treat patients with NDO. YZ is responsible for baseline assessment and follow-up. JW is a research assistant for the project and is responsible for data collection and analysis. All authors have contributed to writing the manuscript and have read and approved this final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fangyuan Xu or Maomao Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate {24}

The ethical approval was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (KY2021091). The China Clinical Trials Registry has approved this study, registration number: ChiCTR2100045148. All participants will sign an informed consent form, and the study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. No personal information related to a participant’s participation in the study will be shared during or after the study.

Consent for publication {32}

Not applicable.

Competing interests {28}

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Reporting checklist for protocol of a clinical trial.

Additional file 2.

Informed consent form.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Wang, J., Hu, Y. et al. Effects of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation in the sacral nerve in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity after suprasacral spinal cord injury: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 24, 199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07207-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07207-1

Keywords