Skip to main content

Surgical treatment versus observation in moderate intermittent exotropia (SOMIX): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common type of strabismus in China, but the best treatment and optimal timing of intervention for IXT remain controversial, particularly for children with moderate IXT who manifest obvious exodeviation frequently but with only partial impairment of binocular single vision. The lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence means that the true effectiveness of the surgical treatment in curing moderate IXT is still unknown. The SOMIX (surgical treatment versus observation in moderate intermittent exotropia) study has been designed to determine the long-term effectiveness of surgery for the treatment and the natural history of IXT among patients aged 5 to 18 years old.

Methods/design

A total of 280 patients between 5 and 18 years of age with moderate IXT will be enrolled at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. After initial clinical assessment, all participants will be randomized to receive surgical treatment or observation, and then be followed up for 5 years. The primary objective is to compare the cure rate of IXT between the surgical treatment and observation group. The secondary objectives are to identify the predictive factors affecting long-term outcomes in each group and to observe the natural course of IXT.

Discussion

The SOMIX trial will provide important guidance regarding the moderate IXT and its managements and modify the treatment strategies of IXT.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 02736526. Registered April 13, 2016 

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Background

Strabismus is a common ophthalmic condition in children with prevalence of 1–5% [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], and intermittent exotropia (IXT) in which the eyes intermittently drift outward is one of the most common types of strabismus in childhood [8]. IXT left untreated can result in decreased stereopsis and amblyopia [9] and could eventually lead to intelligence and psychosocial problems [10, 11].

In clinical practice, the strabismus surgery can be performed in order to realign the eyes in severe IXT without binocular single vision (BSV). However, in children with mild IXT who have relatively normal BSV and good control of ocular alignment, the clinicians and parents prefer an observation rather than surgical or conservative treatments [12,13,14]. The best treatment and optimal timing of intervention for IXT remain unclear [15, 16], particularly for children with moderate IXT who manifest obvious exodeviation frequently but with only partial impairment of BSV. Previous retrospective study showed long-term surgical outcomes in small angle IXT did not appear to be more satisfying than observation [12]. The lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence means that the true effectiveness of the surgical treatment in curing moderate IXT is still unknown, or even when surgery is the preferred option, there is little agreement on the optimal timing for the surgery in this condition [15, 17, 18]. So, here, in the present study, we conducted a randomized trial of children 5 to 18 years of age with moderate IXT to assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment compared with observation for improving the ocular alignment and stereoacuity over long-term period of 5 years.

Objectives

The primary objective of the SOMIX trial (NCT 02,736,526) is to compare the long-term cure rate of IXT between the surgical treatment and observation group. The secondary objectives are to identify the predictive factors affecting long-term outcomes in each group and to observe the natural course of IXT.

Methods

Study design

SOMIX is an RCT study to compare the long-term effectiveness of surgical treatment with observation prospectively in patients with moderate IXT (Fig. 1). No patient or public participated in the design of the protocol.

Fig. 1
figure 1

SOMIX trial design

Study setting

The study setting is the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (ZOC), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, which has 11 strabismus specialists and performs about 1000 IXT surgeries per year.

Participants

The participants are children aged between 5 and 18 years referred to the clinics of ZOC with suspected IXT and subsequently diagnosed as IXT. Prior to any trial-specific procedure, the written informed consent for participation should be obtained from the parents or guardians of the participants.

Sample size

The sample size for this study was calculated based on a standard two-sided trial with a continuous outcome, and the calculations assume 5% type I error with 80% power. According to an average 30% dropout rate in long-term follow-up period, we anticipate that we will require 280 total participants.

Clinical tests

The following clinical assessments are undertaken at each visit:

  • Binocular single vision (BSV) testing: simultaneous perception, motor fusion, and distance stereopsis using synoptophore; near and distance stereopsis using Titmus test and Randot test

  • Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)

  • Measurement of ocular alignment using the prism and alternative cover test (PACT) at near and distance

  • Ocular motility examination

  • Measurement of control of alignment using revised Newcastle control score (NCS)

  • Evaluation of quality of life using Intermittent exotropia questionnaire (IXTQ) [19, 20]

  • Cycloplegic refraction

  • Routine ocular examination of anterior segment, fundus, and ocular motility

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 5 and 18 years

  • Evidence of IXT on the basis of clinical examination: one eye intermittently drifts outward with minimum alternative exodeviation of 15 prism diopters (PD) in the distance; normal ocular motility

  • No previous treatment for IXT (including patching, surgery, over-minus lens, vision therapy, and botulinum toxin)

  • Presence of simultaneous perception and motor fusion documented using synoptophore but abnormal near and distance stereopsis using Titmus test and Randot test (stereoacuity of > 60 arcsec in the Titmus test or > 63 arcsec in the Randot test is defined as “abnormal stereopsis”)

  • BCVA: 0.7 or better at age of 5 to < 6; 0.8 or better at age ≥ 6

  • No ongoing or planned amblyopia treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe refractive errors: spherical equivalent refraction (SER) >  + 2.00 diopters (D) or <  − 3.00 D (the preexisting refractive errors should be corrected with spectacles)

  • Anisometropia > 1.50 D

  • Structural ocular pathology

  • Significant systemic disorders (for example, neurodevelopmental delay)

  • Unable to visit on a regular follow-up (family planning to move out of area)

Dropout criteria

  • Patients in the intervention group with adverse event or serious adverse event following strabismus surgery

  • Patients in the control group with a constant strabismus appears to be developing or whose parents request strabismus surgery

Recruitment and consent

Children who eligible for the trial are clinically assessed when they attend their initial outpatient visit. Discuss about the management of IXT with the parents or guardians and provide the information about the SOMIX study. Parents or guardians who express an interest and possibility of taking part are then given written information of the SOMIX study. At the recruitment clinic, eligibility is confirmed by checking the results of the initial clinical assessment against the inclusion criteria. The informed consent for participation is obtained from those who decide to participate into the trial.

The following routine clinical assessments are undertaken in order to confirm the eligibility of the participants:

  • BSV testing

  • BCVA

  • Measurement of ocular alignment using PACT at near and distance

  • Routine ocular examination of anterior segment, fundus, and ocular motility

Interventions

  1. a)

    Strabismus surgery (group A)

Surgery is performed by specialized strabismus surgeons (Yan, Deng, Lin, Kang, Chen, Wu, Wang, Qiu, and Shen) according to agreed surgical formulae tailored to the clinical characteristics of the surgeon. Principles involved in the surgical procedure have been agreed as follows:

  • General anesthesia

  • Bilateral lateral rectus recession to be performed in divergence excessive IXT; unilateral recess/resect surgery to be performed in convergence insufficient IXT; either surgery in basic type of IXT

  • Standard sterile preparation of the operative sites

  • Conjunctival incisions

  • Standard isolation and cleaning of muscle to be operated

  • Muscle secured with 6/0 vicryl suture

  • Amount of recession and resection assessed on the basis of the maximum distance deviation angle (Table 1), modified according to standard practice of surgeon

  • Conjunctival incisions closed with 8/0 vicryl suture

  • Antibiotic ointments give at the end of procedure

Table 1 Surgical amounts for SOMIX trial

b) Follow-up visit    

The follow-up visits schedule of the study and corresponding clinical assessments for each group are showed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Standard protocol item. The follow-up visits schedule and corresponding clinical assessments. D, day; W, week; M, month; Y, year; BSV, binocular single vision; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; PACT, prism and alternative cover test; NCS, Newcastle control score; IXTQ, intermittent exotropia questionnaire

Children in the observation group will be offered surgical treatment if a constant strabismus appears to be developing or parents request surgery and the responsible clinical team agrees that this is appropriate.

Post-trial care

The study will provide post-trial care and insurance for those who suffer adverse events from trial participation.

Allocation

Sequence generation

A blocked allocation (permuted random blocks of variable length) system is being used to randomly allocate patients to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio to intervention (group A) and control (group B) groups.

Concealment mechanism

Authorized ophthalmologists followed corresponding treatments for enrolling participants based on grouping information.

Implementation

Authorized ophthalmologists will enroll and assign participants. Participants are informed of their group allocation and given the appropriate group allocation information sheet.

Proposed outcome measures

  1. a)

    Primary outcome

For children with IXT, and their parents, the most relevant outcome from intervention is the restoration of normal ocular alignment, with associated cosmetic and functional benefits. The primary outcome of this RCT study will therefore be the difference in the cure rate of IXT between the surgical treatment and observation group.

Cure of IXT will be defined as:

  • Realignment of ocular position at last follow-up, with deviation less than 8 PD both at near and distance

  • Improvement of near and distance stereoacuity ≥ 2 octaves (≥ 0.6 log arcsec)

  1. b)

    Secondary outcome

  • Improvement of NCS

  • Age-specific evaluation of quality of life (IXTQ)

  • Change of refraction

Data management

Data collection

An electronic data capture (EDC) system will be used to collect study data, including baseline characteristics and follow-up clinical evaluations. Participants will be mandatorily followed up regularly in order to access the necessary information.

Confidentiality

All data collected in this study will be strictly protected. Participants in the EDC system will be allocated an individual trial identification number to protect confidentiality before, during, and after the trial.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up

Appropriate medical advices and “green channel” of follow-up visit will be provided to participants if they adhere to the protocol and complete follow-up. The trial steering committee will remind the participants the follow-up time in advance through message or phone call.

Statistical methods

The participant will be included in the analysis, once be randomized, regardless of whether or not the assigned intervention is received, in order to follow the “intention-to-treat” design.

For primary outcome, a chi-squared test will be carried out to evaluate the difference in cure rate at the final assessment between groups. For secondary outcome, a chi-squared test will be used to compare rates of improved NCS outcome between groups; Student’s t-tests will be used to assess the validity by matching individual initial and final scores.

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed with the SPSS statistical package [SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Inc., Chicago, IL, USA], version 19.

Potential risks and adverse events

We conduct active monitoring in both groups for potential risks, especially for the observation group for a natural deterioration in their IXT condition. This risk will be managed biannually for the duration of follow-up period, and the treatment will be offered if needed. Adverse event and serious adverse event following strabismus surgery will be recorded and undertaken properly.

Auditing plan

The ethics committee will meet and communicate important protocol modifications if necessary. Members of the trial steering committee will meet biannually to audit trial conduct.

Protocol amendments

Any changes to the protocol will be reported to the ethics committee by the trial steering committee. Any modifications from the protocol will be fully documented using a breach report form. The modified protocol will also be synchronized in the clinical trial registry.

Dissemination policy

The results of the study will be released to the public via publications.

Discussion

Continued controversy exists regarding IXT and its management, and the natural course of IXT and the factors affecting its control is still unclear. Untreated IXT is traditionally thought to decompensate gradually and that surgical treatment is usually necessary. However, long-term observation indicated that not all surgically untreated IXT deteriorate with passage of time [21,22,23,24,25]. So, there still remains considerable controversy of proper treatment course for IXT, and the indication for and timing of intervention and what therapy is most efficacious remains unclear.

Previous studies have shown that only active observation is a valid course of management for IXT [25, 26]. Surgical treatment is considered for IXT with a progressively increasing deviation angle, increasing deviation frequency, and deterioration of binocular single vision [27, 28]. The younger age at surgery was reported as preoperative factor associated with better surgical outcomes [29, 30]. However, successful motor alignment did not guarantee recovery of BSV [31], and risk of postoperative overcorrection makes the surgical treatment of IXT less favorable [25, 32, 33].

In young patients with moderate IXT who manifest obvious exodeviation frequently but with only partial impairment of BSV, it is quite difficult to make decision for the individual patient whether to choose surgical treatment or not. To the best of our knowledge, no RCT study has been reported to directly compare the surgical treatment versus the natural course of observation in moderate IXT. A pressing need for carefully planned RCT study to provide the evidence for the management of IXT has previously been discussed [34], and a pilot RCT (SamExo) has already been conducted for the feasibility of the full trial [35, 36].

The purpose of SOMIX study is to compare the long-term effectiveness of surgical treatment with observation prospectively in patients with moderate IXT. The main therapeutic goal of intervention is to restore ocular alignment and binocular function, which is also the primary outcome of the present trial. In addition, this study will identify the predictive factors affecting long-term outcomes in each group, which will enhance our understanding of the natural course of moderate IXT, and may modify the treatment strategies of IXT.

Trial status

Recruitment to the SOMIX trial commences in November 2015 and is ongoing at the time of this manuscript submission. Recruitment of the trial was originally scheduled to end in October 2017, but we have extended this phase up to October 2022 in consideration of low enrollment rate after initial screening. Planned follow-up assessments of both groups are orderly conducted.

Protocol version

Protocol ID (ZX201304) of December 21, 2021.

Availability of data and materials

Any data required to support the protocol can be supplied on request.

Abbreviations

IXT:

Intermittent exotropia

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

BSV:

Binocular single vision

BCVA:

Best corrected visual acuity

PACT:

Prism and alternative cover test

NCS:

Newcastle control score

IXTQ:

Intermittent exotropia questionnaire

PD:

Prism diopters

D:

Day

W:

Week

M:

Month

Y:

Year

References

  1. Williams C, Northstone K, Howard M, Harvey I, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM. Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: data from the ALSPAC study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(7):959–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robaei D, Rose KA, Kifley A, Cosstick M, Ip JM, Mitchell P. Factors associated with childhood strabismus: findings from a population-based study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1146–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(3):793–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen X, Fu Z, Yu J, Ding H, Bai J, Chen J, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in Eastern China: results from screening of preschool children aged 36–72 months. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(4):515–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chia A, Dirani M, Chan YH, Gazzard G, Au Eong KG, Selvaraj P, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in young singaporean chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(7):3411–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McKean-Cowdin R, Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Wen G, Kim J, Borchert M, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in asian and non-Hispanic white preschool children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(10):2117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2128-34 e1-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood exotropia: a population-based study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(1):104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buck D, Powell C, Cumberland P, Davis H, Dawson E, Rahi J, et al. Presenting features and early management of childhood intermittent exotropia in the UK: inception cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(12):1620–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun T, Wang Z, Shen T, Yan J, Xie C, Li X. Characterization of intelligence in children with exotropia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(17):3008.

  11. Mojon-Azzi SM, Kunz A, Mojon DS. Strabismus and discrimination in children: are children with strabismus invited to fewer birthday parties? Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):473–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sung JY, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Comparison of surgery versus observation for small angle intermittent exotropia. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kushner BJ. Conservative management of intermittent exotropia to defer or avoid surgery. J AAPOS. 2019;23(5):256 e1-e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Y, Peng T, Zhou J, Xu M, Gao Y, Zhou J, et al. A survey of clinical opinions and preferences on the non-surgical management of intermittent exotropia in China. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2021;71(4):167–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatt SR, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD003737.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyt CS, Pesic A. The many enigmas of intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(10):1280–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson S, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent distance exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD003737.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hatt S, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003737.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yamada T, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Specific health-related quality of life concerns in children with intermittent exotropia. Strabismus. 2012;20(4):145–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hatt SR, Leske DA, Yamada T, Bradley EA, Cole SR, Holmes JM. Development and initial validation of quality-of-life questionnaires for intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmol. 2010;117(1):163-8.

  21. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator G, Writing C, Mohney BG, Cotter SA, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, et al. Three-year observation of children 3 to 10 years of age with untreated intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(9):1249–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Romanchuk KG, Dotchin SA, Zurevinsky J. The natural history of surgically untreated intermittent exotropia-looking into the distant future. J AAPOS. 2006;10(3):225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hiles DA, Davies GT, Costenbader FD. Long-term observations on unoperated intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;80(4):436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwok JJ, Chong GS, Ko ST, Yam JC. The natural course of intermittent exotropia over a 3-year period and the factors predicting the control deterioration. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Buck D, Powell CJ, Rahi J, Cumberland P, Tiffin P, Taylor R, et al. The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator G, Cotter SA, Mohney BG, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Repka MX, et al. A randomized trial comparing part-time patching with observation for children 3 to 10 years of age with intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Joyce KE, Beyer F, Thomson RG, Clarke MP. A systematic review of the effectiveness of treatments in altering the natural history of intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(4):440–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lavrich JB. Intermittent exotropia: continued controversies and current management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(5):375–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dong Y, Nan L, Liu YY. Surgery at early versus late for intermittent exotropia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(4):582–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Repka MX, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Donahue SP, Hoover DL, Mohney BG, et al. The relationship of age and other baseline factors to outcome of initial surgery for intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;212:153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huh J, Ha S-G, Kim S-H. Recovery from suppression with successful motor alignment after surgery for intermittent exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(1):21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang M, Chen J, Shen T, Kang Y, Deng D, Lin X, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in patients with intermittent exotropia: a large sample study in South China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(5):e2590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang M, Chen J, Shen T, Kang Y, Deng D, Lin X, et al. Single stage surgical outcomes for large angle intermittent exotropia. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0150508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hatt S, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;116(3):CD003737.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Buck D, McColl E, Powell CJ, Shen J, Sloper J, Steen N, et al. Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia (SamExo): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Clarke M, Hogan V, Buck D, Shen J, Powell C, Speed C, et al. An external pilot study to test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing eye muscle surgery against active monitoring for childhood intermittent exotropia [X(T)]. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(39):1–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients for their time, commitment, and willingness to participate in this trial and our colleagues from the Department of Strabismus and Amblyopia for their commitment and help in the manufacturing procedure.

Funding

Special Fund for Clinical Research, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (3030901010051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TS: protocol development; drafting and revision of the manuscript. JC: protocol development; trial coordination. YK: protocol development. DD: protocol development. XL: protocol development. HW: protocol development. JL: protocol development. ZW: protocol development. XQ: protocol development. LJ: statistical support, revision of the manuscript. JY: principal investigator, revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Sponsor contact information: Clinical Research Center, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center E-mail: zoccrc@mail.sysu.edu.cn. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhua Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research protocol and the informed consent forms were approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Written informed consent will be obtained from the participant’s parents or guardian by study investigators or coordinators. The IRB of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center will monitor data safety.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain individual personal data from participation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, T., Chen, J., Kang, Y. et al. Surgical treatment versus observation in moderate intermittent exotropia (SOMIX): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 24, 153 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07189-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07189-0

Keywords