Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Distance-based delivery of exercise for people treated for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of EX-MED Cancer Sweden

Trials volume 24, Article number: 116 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Regular exercise has been shown to have beneficial health effects in cancer survivors, including improving quality of life and other important health outcomes. However, providing people with cancer with easily accessible, high-quality exercise support and programs is a challenge. Therefore, there is a need to develop easily accessible exercise programs that draw upon the current evidence. Supervised, distance-based exercise programs have the benefit of reaching out to many people whilst providing the support of an exercise professional. The aim of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is to examine the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program, in people previously treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as well as other physiological and patient-reported health outcomes.

Methods

The EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is a prospective randomised controlled trial including 200 people that have completed curative treatment for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. Participants are randomly allocated to an exercise group or a routine care control group. The exercise group will participate in a supervised, distanced-based exercise program delivered by a personal trainer who has undertaken specialised exercise oncology education modules. The intervention consists of a combination of resistance and aerobic exercises with participants completing two 60-min sessions per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) assessed at baseline, 3- (end of intervention and primary endpoint) and 6-months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes are physiological (cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, physical function, body composition) and patient-reported outcomes (cancer-related symptoms, fatigue, self-reported physical activity), and self-efficacy of exercise. Furthermore, the trial will explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise intervention.

Discussion

The EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program for survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. If successful, it will contribute to the implementation of flexible and effective exercise programs as part of the standard of care for people following cancer treatment, which is likely to contribute to a reduction in the burden of cancer on the individual, health care system and society.

Trial registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05064670. Registered on October 1, 2021.

Peer Review reports

Background

There is now robust evidence showing that both aerobic and resistance exercise plays an important role in improving the quality of life, psychological health, and physical function, as well as helping to manage common cancer-related side effects, among people who have completed cancer treatment [1,2,3,4,5]. International health organisations are therefore calling for exercise to be incorporated into routine cancer care [6,7,8]; however, the great challenge in the field of exercise oncology is being able to provide people with cancer easily accessible, high-quality exercise support and programs. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop exercise programs that draw upon the current evidence base that can be delivered to as many people as possible.

In recent years, particularly in light of a major pandemic, there has been an increase in distance-based delivery of health care in an attempt to improve supportive care services for people with cancer [9, 10]. Interventions such as symptom monitoring and management, remote rehabilitation program delivery, nursing support, health education, and psychotherapy are provided using digital technologies including telephones or smartphones, video, and web-based portals [9, 11]. Although much of health care delivery still occurs face-to-face, distance-based interventions have been shown to improve health-related outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional capacity, and cancer-related symptoms [9, 11]. Additionally, distance-based interventions are now much more accepted, are clinically safe, and have the major advantage of reducing the impact on a person’s daily activities, for example by minimising the burden of travel [12,13,14].

The original EX-MED Cancer program (exercise medicine program for people with cancer) [15], a supervised, facility-based exercise program, was developed, trialled, and implemented in Australia to incorporate best practice evidence-based exercise prescription whilst minimising burden to patients and health care professionals [16]. It capitalises on existing community-based workforce and resources, to facilitate widespread participation by cancer survivors, scalability, and sustainability of the program with the goal of embedding exercise medicine into routine cancer care. EX-MED Cancer Sweden has been adapted from the Australian model to a distance-based exercise program. Supervised, distance-based exercise programs have the benefit of reaching out to as many people as possible, allowing participants to exercise at home, avoiding public places and travel, whilst still gleaning the benefits of supervision by a trained fitness professional [17, 18]. Additional commonly identified facilitators of exercise among cancer survivors include group-based exercise with other cancer survivors, and exercise that is individually tailored, varied, and gradually progressive with individual feedback [17, 18].

Whilst the EX-MED Cancer program has been successfully implemented in Australia, no similar program exists or has been trialled in Sweden. EX-MED Cancer Sweden is a single-centre phase 3 randomised controlled trial. It aims to examine the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program, in people previously treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, on HRQoL, as well as other physiological and patient-reported health outcomes. Additionally, we aim to explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise program, to inform further design and implementation of exercise programs for cancer survivors.

Methods and design

EX-MED Cancer Sweden is a prospective superiority two-armed single-centre randomised controlled trial, testing a supervised, distance-based physical exercise intervention for survivors of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The trial is based on the EX-MED Cancer trial, ongoing program and professional development course originally developed and implemented in Australia [15, 16, 19]. The primary outcome is HRQoL. Secondary outcomes are physiological (cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscle strength, physical function, body composition) and patient-reported outcomes (cancer-related symptoms, fatigue, self-reported physical activity), and self-efficacy of exercise. Furthermore, the trial will explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise intervention.

Table 1 Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic flow diagram of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial

Full size image

Study setting

The exercise lab at The Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Sweden, is responsible for the coordination of EX-MED Cancer Sweden. It is the central point of contact for study participants and health care professionals and where testing will be conducted. Study participants will exercise in their own homes, or other suitable locations, using the online platform Microsoft® Teams, where a personal trainer will be the host and supervisor for the session.

Population

People diagnosed with any type of stage I–IIIa breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer who have undergone and completed curative treatment in the last five years whilst fulfilling all inclusion criteria are eligible to participate in the trial (Table 2). People are eligible if they are currently receiving or are scheduled to receive anti-hormonal therapy. Informed consent is required before baseline testing and will be obtained by a nursing member of the research team.

Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria in the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial
Full size table

A selection of people participating in the exercise intervention and the personal trainers, employed at the gym franchise SATS, will be recruited to a qualitative study exploring and describing experiences of participation in the intervention.

Intervention

All participants will undergo baseline testing of physical fitness and strength prior to randomisation. Participants randomised to the intervention will be registered for the next exercise group to commence within 2 weeks of baseline testing. Participants will complete two 60-min distance-based exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks (24 sessions in total). The program consists of a combination of resistance and aerobic exercises. The exercise sessions are delivered by upskilled personal trainers in groups of up to eight people. Educational modules have been developed for the personal trainers and are delivered by the research group prior to delivering the intervention. These modules are the EX-MED Cancer PD course [19], developed in Australia by author PC, with modifications made to contextualise the content to the Swedish healthcare setting. Modules consist of an introduction to cancer, side effects of cancer treatments, screening and monitoring of cancer, exercise prescription for cancer and working with people with cancer. Prior to commencing the exercise intervention, participants will receive an in-person familiarisation of the exercise program from a member of the research team. They will be provided with a hard copy of the exercise program, resistance bands for training, a detailed information booklet about exercise for people with cancer, and a logbook to record attendance, exercise adherence and level of exertion. Any barriers to exercise identified by the participant or the research team will also be discussed, and solutions developed together.

The exercise intervention is a progressive circuit training program consisting of a consecutive series of timed exercises performed one after the other. Incorporating whole-body functional exercises, sessions include four blocks with three exercises per block, including two whole-body resistance-focused and one aerobic-focused. Each set of three exercises will be performed for a prescribed amount of time with the participant completing as many repetitions as possible in this time. Each exercise is followed by a short rest interval with a longer rest interval after each set. Each set will be repeated three times before moving on to the next block containing three new exercises. Intensity will be manipulated by using body weight and two different resistance bands, light and medium, and by the participant increasing or decreasing the number of repetitions performed during the prescribed time. Each session will include a warmup and cooldown. The personal trainer will monitor each participant during the sessions to ensure exercises are performed correctly and safely. Exercise prescription is progressive and will be modified by the personal trainer according to individual response. The personal trainer will support the participants to achieve an overall exercise intensity of 14–18 on Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. Participants will be encouraged to perform at least 150 min of moderate physical activity per week, inclusive of the exercise intervention sessions.

Following the completion of the exercise intervention, immediately after the completion of the post-intervention testing session, participants will receive a written Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP) and be encouraged to continue to exercise. The individualised PAP is a written prescription provided by a registered healthcare professional that prescribes physical activity outside of healthcare services, with the aim of increasing levels of physical activity and integrating it into everyday life [21]. They will be given the opportunity to discuss any goals, preferences, or barriers to future exercise. Participants will not receive any contact or exercise support in the 3-month follow-up period following the initial 3-month intervention.

Control

As the aim of the trial is to compare the effectiveness of the exercise program with routine care, the control group is a routine care control group. This means that study participants will receive routine care according to national guidelines [22], which does not involve a standardised, structured exercise program, but may include information and advice about physical activity from the treating nurse, physician or physiotherapist.

At the completion of the trial, following the 6-month post-baseline (follow-up) testing session, the study participants in the control group will be offered a home exercise program, a written PAP, and the same exercise information booklet the exercise intervention group was given. In addition, they will also be offered a hard copy of the same exercise program used in the intervention, including pictures and instructions for the exercises.

Outcomes

Participants will complete measurements for primary and secondary endpoints at baseline, 3 months post-baseline (post-intervention), and 6 months post-baseline (follow-up) (Table 1). Participants will attend the exercise lab at the Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre for the testing sessions and questionnaires will be completed online.

Primary outcome

The primary endpoint, patient-reported HRQoL at 3 months (post-intervention), will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a cancer-specific instrument that measures HRQoL in relation to physical, emotional, social, cognitive, and everyday function [23, 24].

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1.

    Estimated CRF (estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max) assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test [25, 26] on a cycle ergometer (Monark 928E, Monark Exercise AB, Sweden).

  2. 2.

    Muscle strength assessed by the hypothetical 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) test for both the upper body (chest press) and lower body (leg press) [27]. Additionally, handgrip strength [28] assessed using a hydraulic hand dynamometer (SAEHAN Corporation, South Korea).

  3. 3.

    Physical function assessed by the 5 sit-to-stand test, where participants will be asked to stand up and sit down in a chair as fast as they safely can five times [29].

  4. 4.

    Body composition measured using bio-impedance analysis (BIA) to assess body fat (BF%), fat mass (kg) and lean mass (kg), using the (InBody770, InBody Corporation, South Korea).

  5. 5.

    Common cancer-related symptoms assessed by the 32-item Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) including occurrence, frequency, severity, and distress associated with each symptom using four- and five-point rating scales [30]. The instrument has been validated for Swedish patients with breast cancer [31].

  6. 6.

    Fatigue assessed by the Piper Fatigue Scale including the four dimensions of behavioural/severity, affective meaning, sensory, and cognitive/mood [32]. The instrument has been shown to be reliable among Swedish populations of patients with cancer [33].

  7. 7.

    Self-reported physical activity assessed by the Modified Godin Leisure Time Physical activity questionnaire [34].

  8. 8.

    Patient-reported HRQoL will be also measured at the follow-up timepoint as a secondary endpoint.

  9. 9.

    Self-efficacy for exercise (SEE) assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise questionnaire [35] – Swedish version (SEE-SV) [36, 37] to examine whether SEE is a predictor of short and long-term changes in exercise behaviour in this trial.

Attendance and adherence to the exercise sessions will be continuously reported by the personal trainer to the research team. Additionally, cost-effectiveness will be measured using the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5L-5D) questionnaire [38] and purpose-designed cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay questionnaires.

To explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise program, the participants in the intervention group will complete a purpose-designed questionnaire. Furthermore, a selection of the participants from the intervention group and the personal trainers involved in delivering the exercise program will be invited to participate in separate focus groups or individual interviews.

Participant demographics including general medical and cancer history, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure, body mass, height, body mass index, age, sex, smoking status, education level, relationship status, and percentage of sick leave will be recorded to characterise the participant groups.

Participant timeline

Following screening and providing informed consent, participants will answer questionnaires online and complete baseline testing at the exercise lab (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Following the baseline testing session participants will be randomised to either the intervention group or routine care control group. The intervention group will commence the exercise program within 2 weeks of baseline testing. The control group will continue to receive usual care and will have no contact with the research team until the 3-month testing session, unless initiated by the participant. Participants in both groups will answer questionnaires and complete testing sessions again at 3 months post-baseline (post-intervention) and 6 months post-baseline (follow-up). There will be no contact with the research team for either group between the 3- and 6-month post-baseline unless initiated by the participant.

Sample size

We aim to include 200 participants in this trial. Sample size calculations have been based on having sufficient power to detect a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.5) for the primary endpoint, overall patient-reported HRQoL post-intervention. We regard an improvement in HRQoL in the intervention arm from baseline to three months post-baseline relative to the control arm to be of relevance. With a power of 80% and an alpha of 5% (two tailed) from pre- to post-intervention, a total of 160 participants needs to be included; 80 in each arm.

To ensure sufficient participant numbers at the completion of the trial, sample size calculations account for a 20% attrition rate, leading to a total sample size of 200 participants.

Recruitment

Recruitment commenced in January 2022 and is ongoing. Participants are recruited from Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sweden using the following three methods:

  1. 1.

    Nurses and physicians involved in the care of the respective diagnosis groups will inform potential participants about the trial during a regular visit or by mail/letter or telephone. Details of interested individuals will be forwarded to the research team.

  2. 2.

    A nurse in the research team will review electronic patient records to identify potential participants and contact the treating nurse or physician to obtain permission to contact the individual.

  3. 3.

    Information posters and brochures will be placed in the waiting rooms of the respective outpatient clinics where patients are followed up so that interested individuals can make direct contact with the research team.

Interested individuals will be provided with verbal and written information about the trial by a nursing member of the research team who will also screen for eligibility. Screening will be conducted in consultation with the trial physician in the case of any individual having a medical condition that may prevent safe participation in the study. Eligible individuals will then be provided with the full participant information form explaining the trial aims and procedures. After reading through the full information form and having the opportunity to ask questions, participants will be invited to sign a written informed consent form by a nursing member of the research team.

The personal trainers invited to participate in the focus groups or individual interviews will be provided with the full participant information form, given the opportunity to ask questions, and invited to sign a written informed consent form.

Assignment of interventions

After the completion of baseline testing, study participants will be randomised by a member of the research team on a 1:1 basis in block samples, using the computer-generated randomisation program ALEA. Randomisation will be stratified by disease type (breast, prostate or colorectal) and treatment with chemotherapy (yes or no). Study investigators and participants will be blinded to group allocation at baseline, but not at the subsequent testing timepoints. The design is open label so unblinding will not occur.

Data collection and management

Data are collected and entered exclusively by members of the research team. In the interest of standardising the testing procedures, a standardised operating procedures manual has been developed and all testers will undergo standardised training to conduct the tests. The same members of the research team monitor the participants to ensure follow-up completion, including email and SMS reminders. All hard copies of forms are kept in a locked filing cabinet at Karolinska Institutet. All recorded data are pseudonymised. Participants will not be identified in the resulting manuscripts and reports. Only the study investigators have access to trial information and the dataset.

The EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05064670). Ethical permissions have been obtained by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2019–04,151, 2021–01,715). All participants must provide written informed consent to participate in this trial.

Statistical methods

Analyses will be performed using an intention-to-treat approach. For the quantitative analysis, descriptive statistics will be used to describe baseline characteristics. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and linear mixed modelling will be used to detect any significant differences between the two groups at three and six months, respectively. Corresponding effect sizes will also be calculated. Explorative sub-analysis by cancer type will be conducted to investigate if any effects of the exercise intervention are cancer type specific.

For the qualitative analysis, focus group discussions/individual interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Serious adverse events

All (serious) adverse events ((S)AE) related to the study measurements or exercise, reported by the participant, observed by the personal trainer or study investigators will be recorded. Participants in both groups will be asked by a study investigator about any study measurement- or exercise-related (S) AEs systematically and in a standardised manner at the 3- and 6-month testing timepoints. Additionally, participants in the intervention group will be asked by the personal trainer, before and after each exercise session, about any potentially exercise-related (S) AEs that have occurred during or between exercise sessions and will report back to the study investigators. In the event of a SAE event during the exercise sessions, the personal trainer will immediately call for medical assistance and contact the study investigators. (S) AEs are reported to the participant’s physician or nurse in a standardised manner. Participants involved in the trial are covered by the national patient insurance system.

Discussion

Exercise is a proven strategy to alleviate treatment-related side-effects and to maintain or improve HRQoL in cancer survivors [1,2,3,4,5]. Exercise rehabilitation strategies are therefore recommended within cancer care [6,7,8]. By providing a supervised, distanced-based exercise program we can reach out to more cancer survivors who will receive support and guidance from an exercise professional [17, 18]. To date, there are no standardised exercise programs for cancer survivors in Sweden, which is the underlying rationale for the randomised EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial.

EX-MED Cancer Sweden is an innovative, supervised distance-based approach to providing exercise support to cancer survivors in their own homes. Several aspects of the trial have contributed to its innovative nature. The exercise program is initiated through the hospital system but delivered by an upskilled community-based workforce. Exercise programs that include supervision are most effective [39], yet the health care system does not have the resources to provide every cancer survivor with supervised exercise programs. By upskilling exercise professionals in the community, we are creating an important bridge between the healthcare system and the community by providing more sustainable, yet high-quality, exercise support. Using a distance-based approach ensures the program is flexible, agile, and accessible. By reducing the travel burden for participants, we can reach out to more people, which increases the feasibility of the program. We need to capitalise on the increased use of distance-based technology to deliver healthcare interventions in this post-pandemic era [9, 10].

The design of the exercise program increases its’ feasibility and accessibility as participants do not require expensive training equipment that may not be available in the home environment. Additionally, distance-based training in a safe home environment [14] may lower the threshold for cancer survivors to start exercising. Personal trainers are also able to adapt and individualise exercises and exercise intensity can easily be increased or decreased. Such adaptions to the program ensure a personalised exercise prescription for each participant.

Contamination, where control participants adopt some sort of exercise, and drop-out among the control group are important considerations in exercise oncology trials as they can affect trial results [40, 41]. Meaningful improvements in control groups’ physical activity have been reported in 30% of physical activity intervention trials [40], and as such we will take measures to decrease the risk of contamination and drop-out [41]. Participants in the control group will not be permitted to see the exercise information booklet or the exercise program. Additionally, the control group will be promised a home exercise program at the completion of the trial.

In conclusion, in the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial, we are examining the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program, in people previously treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, on HRQoL, as well as other physiological and patient-reported health outcomes. Furthermore, we will explore and describe the experiences of participation in the exercise program. Knowledge gained from this trial will provide meaningful information needed to strengthen rehabilitation strategies within cancer care. If successful, EX-MED Cancer Sweden will contribute significantly to the national and international movement to implement flexible and effective exercise programs as part of standard of care for people following cancer treatment, which is likely to contribute to a reduction in the burden of cancer on the individual, health care system and society.

Dissemination of results

The study investigators will inform all participants about the results of the study. The results of the study will be reported in peer-reviewed international journals, popular science articles, e.g., from patient organisations and professional associations, and presented at local and international conferences. Policymakers, healthcare providers, funding bodies, and other important stakeholders, e.g., patient organisations, will be informed on the outcomes of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial.

Trial status

Protocol version number and date: version 2.0 date 11/12/2020.

Recruitment for the trial began in January 2022 and is expected to be completed by September 2023.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

EX-MED Cancer:

Exercise medicine program for people with cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30:

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire

VO2max:

Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake

1-RM:

1 Repetition maximum

CRF:

Cardiorespiratory fitness

RPE:

Rating of perceived exertion

PAP:

Physical activity on prescription

BIA:

Bio-impedance analysis

MSAS:

Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale

SEE:

Self-Efficacy of Exercise

SEE-SV:

Self-Efficacy of Exercise – Swedish version

EQ-5L-5D:

EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

(S) AE:

(Serious) adverse event

References

  1. Lahart IM, Metsios GS, Nevill AM, Carmichael AR. Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:CD011292. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011292.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGettigan M, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM, Tully MA. Physical activity interventions for disease-related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non-advanced colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5:CD012864. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012864.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loughney LA, West MA, Kemp GJ, Grocott MPW, Jack S. Exercise interventions for people undergoing multimodal cancer treatment that includes surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD012280. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012280.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knips L, Bergenthal N, Streckmann F, Monsef I, Elter T, Skoetz N. Aerobic physical exercise for adult patients with haematological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1:CD009075. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009075.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavalheri V, Burtin C, Formico VR, Nonoyama ML, Jenkins S, Spruit MA, et al. Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6:CD009955. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009955.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(11):2375–90. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cormie P, Atkinson M, Bucci L, Cust A, Eakin E, Hayes S, et al. Clinical oncology society of Australia position statement on exercise in cancer care. Med J Aust. 2018;209(4):184–7. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja18.00199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ligibel JA, Bohlke K, May AM, Clinton SK, Demark-Wahnefried W, Gilchrist SC, et al. Exercise, diet, and weight management during cancer treatment: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(22):2491–507. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marthick M, McGregor D, Alison J, Cheema B, Dhillon H, Shaw T. supportive care interventions for people with cancer assisted by digital technology: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(10):e24722. https://doi.org/10.2196/24722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Winters-Stone KM, Boisvert C, Li F, Lyons KS, Beer TM, Mitri Z, et al. Delivering exercise medicine to cancer survivors: has COVID-19 shifted the landscape for how and who can be reached with supervised group exercise? Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(3):1903–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06669-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buneviciene I, Mekary RA, Smith TR, Onnela JP, Bunevicius A. Can mHealth interventions improve quality of life of cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;157:103123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson JL, Rosen AB, Wilson FA. The effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(6):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickinson R, Hall S, Sinclair JE, Bond C, Murchie P. Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):311. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrison KS, Paterson C, Toohey K. The feasibility of exercise interventions delivered via telehealth for people affected by cancer: a rapid review of the literature. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(6):151092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. EX-MED Cancer. https://www.exmedcancer.org.au. Accessed 8 Nov 2022.

  16. Cormie P, EX-MED Cancer Steering Committee. EX-MED Cancer: A Community Based Exercise Medicine Program for Cancer Survivors. Victoria: Department of Health, Victoria State Government; 2019. VCSP3001.

  17. Elshahat S, Treanor C, Donnelly M. Factors influencing physical activity participation among people living with or beyond cancer: a systematic scoping review. Int J Beh Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01116-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors’ exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):186–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. EX-MED Cancer PD. https://exmedcancerpd.learnbook.com.au. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

  20. American College of Sports Medicine, Liguori G, Feito Y, Fountaine C, Roy BA, editors. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.

  21. Public Health Agency of Sweden. EUPAP – A European model for Physical Activity on Prescription. 2020. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/the-public-health-agency-of-sweden/living-conditions-and-lifestyle/physical-activity/eupap-a-european-model-for-physical-activity-on-prescription. Accessed 8 Nov 2022.

  22. Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden. National Clinical Guidelines for Cancer Rehabilitation. Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden. 2021. https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/cancerrehabilitering/vardprogram. Accessed 2 Nov 2022.

  23. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW, et al. Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ekblom-Bak E, Björkman F, Hellenius ML, Ekblom B. A new submaximal cycle ergometer test for prediction of VO2max. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(2):319–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Björkman F, Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom Ö, Ekblom B. Validity of the revised Ekblom Bak cycle ergometer test in adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(9):1627–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3412-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Landers J. Maximums based on reps. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J. 1984;6(6):60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bobos P, Nazari G, Lu Z, MacDermid JC. Measurement properties of the hand grip strength assessment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(3):553–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muñoz-Bermejo L, Adsuar JC, Mendoza-Muñoz M, Barrios-Fernández S, Garcia-Gordillo MA, Pérez-Gómez J, et al. Test-retest reliability of Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST) in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(6):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, Kiyasu E, et al. The memorial symptom assessment scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30a(9):1326–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011292.pub2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Browall M, Kenne Sarenmalm E, Nasic S, Wengström Y, Gaston-Johansson F. Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(1):131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Piper BF. Piper fatigue scale available for clinical testing. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1990;17(5):661–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jakobsson S, Taft C, Östlund U, Ahlberg K. Performance of the Swedish version of the revised piper fatigue scale. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(6):808–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Amireault S, Godin G, Lacombe J, Sabiston CM. The use of the godin-shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Resnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise scale. Nurs Res. 2000;49(3):154–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rydwik E, Hovmöller F, Boström C. Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(2):131–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2013.838614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dahlbäck A, Andréll P, Varkey E. Reliability and aspects of validity of the Swedish version of self-efficacy for exercise scale for patients with chronic pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(1):163–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.1999356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher AK, Winters-Stone KM, Welsh J. A systematic review of exercise systematic reviews in the cancer literature (2005–2017). PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S347-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.07.074.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Waters L, Reeves M, Fjeldsoe B, Eakin E. Control group improvements in physical activity intervention trials and possible explanatory factors: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(6):884–95. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.9.6.884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steins Bisschop CN, Courneya KS, Velthuis MJ, Monninkhof EM, Jones LW, Friedenreich C, et al. Control group design, contamination and drop-out in exercise oncology trials: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Protocol amendments

Modifications made to the protocol after its original acceptance will be submitted to the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Modifications and new information will be communicated to the included patients.

Sponsor contact information

Trial sponsor: Karolinska Institutet.

Sponsor’s reference: 3–4059/2020.

Contact name: Yvonne Wengström.

Address: Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet.

Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden.

Email: yvonne.wengstrom@ki.se.

Organisational structure and responsibilities

Principal Investigator and Research Physician—YW, RA; Design and conduct—MK, KB, SM, RA, YW; Preparation of protocol and revisions—MK, KB, SM, RA, YW; Organising steering committee meetings—YW, MK; Publication of study reports—MK, KB, SM, RA, PC, YW; Members of TSC (Trial Steering Committee)—YW, MK, RA, CTO (Clinical Trials Organisation) Karolinska University Hospital, meets annually to audit and review the conduct of the trial. The auditing process is independent of investigators and sponsors; Agreement of final protocol—MK, KB, SM, RA, YW; Recruitment of participants—MK, RA, YW; Reviewing the progress of the study and if necessary agreeing to changes to the protocol to facilitate the smooth running of the study—MK, KB, SM, RA, YW; Project administrators—MK, RA, YW; Study planning—MK, KB, RA, YW; Responsible for trial master file—YW, MK; Data verification—YW, MK; Randomisation—CTO Karolinska University Hospital; Data Manager, Maintenance of trial IT system and data entry—MK, YW, Lageros IT. MK, YW meet patient representatives annually.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This study is funded by a grant from the Swedish Cancer Society (19 0089 Pj) to Professor Yvonne Wengström and by the Research School in Health Science, Karolinska Institutet (3–4059/2020) to Kate A Bolam. The funders do not have a direct role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Melissa Kotte and Kate A. Bolam shared first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Melissa Kotte, Kate A. Bolam, Sara Mijwel & Yvonne Wengström

  2. Department of Physical Activity and Health, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden

    Kate A. Bolam

  3. Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway

    Sara Mijwel

  4. Medical Unit Breast, Endocrine Tumors and Sarcoma, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Renske Altena & Yvonne Wengström

  5. Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Renske Altena

  6. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Prue Cormie

  7. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Prue Cormie

  8. EX-MED Cancer, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Prue Cormie

Authors
  1. Melissa Kotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kate A. Bolam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Mijwel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Renske Altena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prue Cormie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yvonne Wengström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MK, KB, SM, RA and YW have made substantial contributions to the conceptualisation and design of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial. PC is the founder of EX-MED Cancer, responsible for the design, development and implementation of the EX-MED Cancer trial, organisation, and professional development course (i.e. educational modules). YW is the principal investigator of the study. MK, RA and YW are responsible for project administration. MK and YW are responsible for data collection. KB and MK have drafted the work and all authors have revised it and approved the final version of the manuscript. Professional writers will not be used.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Kotte.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical permissions (2019–04151, 2021–01715) have been obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Participants provide signed written consent to participate in the trial.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotte, M., Bolam, K.A., Mijwel, S. et al. Distance-based delivery of exercise for people treated for breast, prostate or colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of EX-MED Cancer Sweden. Trials 24, 116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07152-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07152-z

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215