Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Randomized controlled trial evaluating a virtual parenting intervention for young children at risk of obesity: study protocol for Parenting Addressing Early Years Intervention with Coaching Visits in Toronto (PARENT) trial

Trials volume 24, Article number: 8 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of overweight (15%) and obesity (6%) in children under 5 years of age in Canada are high, and young children with overweight and obesity are at increased risk of the development of chronic disease(s) in adulthood. Prior research has demonstrated very few published trials on effective obesity prevention interventions in young children at risk of obesity, within primary healthcare settings. The aim of this study is to determine if 18–48-month-old children at risk for obesity, who are randomized to receive the Parents Together program (i.e., intervention group), have reduced body mass index z-score (zBMI), compared to those not receiving the intervention, at a 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical outcomes between the intervention and control groups will be compared at 12 months.

Methods

A pragmatic, parallel group, 1:1, superiority, randomized control trial (RCT) through the TARGetKids! Practice Based Research Network will be conducted. Young children (ages 18–48 months) who are at increased risk for childhood obesity will be invited to participate. Parents who are enrolled in the intervention group will participate in eight weekly group sessions and 4–5 coaching visits, facilitated by a trained public health nurse. Children and parents who are enrolled in the control group will receive the usual health care. The primary outcome will be compared between intervention arms using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by parent focus groups and interviews, and fidelity to the intervention will be measured using nurse-completed checklists. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted.

Discussion

This study will aim to reflect the social, cultural, and geographic diversity of children in primary care in Toronto, Ontario, represented by an innovative collaboration among applied child health researchers, community health researchers, and primary care providers (i.e., pediatricians and family physicians in three different models of primary care). Clinical and implementation outcomes will be used to inform future research to test this intervention in a larger number, and diverse practices across diverse geographic settings in Ontario.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03219697. Registered on June 27, 2017.

Peer Review reports

Background

The prevalence of overweight (15%) and obesity (6%) [1, 2] in Canadian children are high, and one-third of Canadian youth are affected. Preschool children with overweight or obesity are at risk of obesity in later childhood and adulthood, mental health problems, cardiometabolic disease [3,4,5], and increased healthcare utilization [6].

Most obesity prevention interventions have been delivered in elementary or middle school settings [7]. Few interventions have been delivered in other settings such as home, primary care, or community settings. Home visiting, parenting skill-building, and parent support through coaching calls are all promising approaches toward obesity prevention in early childhood [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Two trials implemented intensive and frequent home visits and parenting support through coaching calls and text messages, showing a small but significant reduction in standardized zBMI at 6 months and 2 years [10, 11]. One RCT conducted in primary care used a group-based parenting intervention alone and demonstrated improvement in child’s eating behaviors but not zBMI [9]. Another trial where primary care providers delivered biweekly counseling and telephone phone coaching for parents found a reduction in total energy intake at 12 months among those in the intervention, but there was no difference seen in the children’s zBMI [12].

Many interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness were of high intensity and duration and utilized core components such as home visiting or telephone support in primary care, but few focused on children at risk of obesity. The PARENT trial aims to determine if a multifaceted intervention (including coaching visits and virtual group parenting sessions), delivered by a trained public health nurse, with a focus on parenting skills to support healthy behaviors, will result in reduced zBMI and improved health behaviors and outcomes when compared to usual care at 12 months post-intervention. Evaluation of implementation outcomes will inform clinical outcomes and the potential for future scale-up.

Methods/design

Participants and study design

Study design

This will be a pragmatic, parallel group, 1:1, superiority, randomized controlled trial, within The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGetKids!) Practice Based Research Network. TARGetKids! is a primary care research network for children in Toronto, Montreal, and Kingston, Canada. The protocol for this study has been developed in accordance with the SPIRIT Reporting Guidelines [13].

Inclusion criteria

Young children (18–48 months) identified as being at increased risk for childhood obesity will be eligible and invited to participate. The following risk factors, identified in the literature, will be used: a birth weight greater than 3500 g [14], weight gain in the first year of life (crossing of at least one percentile line of weight-for-length or zBMI percentile) [15], maternal or paternal overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 25) [16], gestational smoking [17], and a low median household self-reported income [18]. Availability of at least one parent (caregiver) to participate in the study will be required.

Exclusion criteria

Young children with Prader-Willi syndrome or severe developmental delays or with obesity or severe obesity will be excluded, as they may require a different intervention; families who are not able to participate in English will also be excluded, as the intervention is only available in English; children with a sibling already enrolled in the study will be excluded to control for confounding variables; and families who reside beyond the Toronto Public Health catchment areas will be excluded from this study, as the intervention is delivered by Toronto Public Health nurses.

Measurements

Eligible participants will be invited to complete questionnaires, physical measurements, accelerometry, and laboratory testing at baseline prior to randomization and at follow-up at 12 months. To comply with public health precautionary measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, if children and parents are unable to attend the primary care setting at enrollment, parents will perform height and weight measurements using standardized equipment with instructions sent to their home. Questionnaires and physical measurements will also be collected at 6 months. Questionnaires include measures of child’s mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), child’s development (Ages and Stages Questionnaire), child’s temperament (Child’s Behaviour Questionnaire), child’s dietary intake (NutriSTEP®), physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep duration (Nutrition and Health Questionnaire), direct measure of physical activity, family psychosocial health (Depression, Anxiety, and Parenting Stress), parenting skills (Parenting Scale), and healthcare utilization. Physical measurements include anthropometric measurements to calculate zBMI and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Blood samples for cholesterol, insulin, and glucose will be collected at baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. Implementation feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by interviewing parents. Fidelity to the intervention will be assessed using fidelity checklists for all intervention core components, and cost will be collected from study investigators, participants, and administrative datasets.

Clinical outcome variables

The primary outcome measure will be the difference in age- and sex-standardized BMI z-score at 12 months post-randomization in the intervention and control groups. zBMI will also be measured at 6 months post-randomization. BMI is the key obesity-related outcome used in prevention and treatment trials in obesity and is the Canadian standard for growth monitoring, using the World Health Organization Growth Chart [19, 20]. Secondary outcomes will include physical activity, screen time, sleep duration, eating behaviors, family psychosocial health, cardiometabolic risk (blood pressure, waist circumference, non-HDL, HDL, triglycerides, total cholesterol, glucose, insulin), and mental health outcomes in the children. Sociodemographic measures will be collected via a questionnaire. We will examine healthcare utilization outcomes for children and their mothers through secondary data in partnership with The Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (https://www.ices.on.ca/). For a more detailed overview of all measures, please see Table 1.

Table 1 Outcome measures for the PARENT trial
Full size table

Implementation effectiveness outcomes

The feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity outcomes and their corresponding measures for the study are based on a working taxonomy of implementation outcomes [21]. Implementation fidelity will be assessed to capture adherence to the program core components, delivered as intended. A random sample of parents will be interviewed by phone regarding their experience (of the program and implementation).

Health service outcomes

A CEA will be used to determine the incremental costs of the parenting intervention compared to usual care in improving child’s BMI. Using patient-level data, the CEA will take a health system perspective and a 12-month time horizon. All costs and outcomes will be assigned to the family as the unit of analysis. Direct healthcare costs including costs of creating and executing the intervention and health service use during the study period will be collected from study investigators and participants. Individual health service utilization will be linked to administrative datasets for those healthcare visits which are reimbursed by the publicly funded system. Direct patient costs will include out-of-pocket expenses and childcare cost incurred from participating in the intervention. The parenting intervention will be micro-costed and will include all labor and supplies related to creating the program as well as ongoing delivery of the program. Intervention costs will be collected during the study interval and will be allocated across all participants.

Study procedures

Eligibility and recruitment

Eligible participants will be recruited through the TARGetKids! practice sites in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada, via research assistants and recruitment flyers and videos. To confirm and encourage parents and their children’s attendance at well-child check-up appointments, a research assistant will send one email reminder to the parent about their upcoming appointment 3–4 weeks before the scheduled appointment date. One week before their scheduled appointment, a research assistant will contact the parent via telephone, one time, to remind them of their scheduled appointment. Participants will be asked to complete an informed consent by an on-site research assistant if they choose to participate in the study. They will then complete baseline assessments and will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. All parents and children will have follow-up visits at 6 months and 12 months post-intervention by a trained research personnel, and all outcome data will be collected by trained TARGetKids! research staff embedded at each practice site.

Randomization and blinding

Individual children will be randomized based on a stratified randomization technique, ensuring equal recruitment of intervention and control participants for each practice site, executed via computer-generated random allocation sequence, in variable block sizes (i.e., 2, 4, 6). Contamination will be addressed by delivering the parenting group sessions after hours or online, and we will record all participants’ participation in other community-based services. To reduce the risk of bias, research assistants who will not be part of the delivery of the intervention will collect all outcome data, and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Parents cannot be blinded to the study allocation; however, they will be blinded that the primary outcome is zBMI.

Intervention

The intervention is composed of eight 2-h weekly group-based sessions and 4–5 coaching visits over a 6-month period. To consolidate learning, 1–2 group booster sessions (1 h each) will be scheduled following completion of the eight parenting group sessions. The intervention curriculum was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts in child growth and development, health and mental health, parenting, nutrition, and movement behaviors including physical activity, screen time, and sleep. For an overview of the study timeline, please see Fig. 1a and b.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Intervention and outcome measure timeline. b Overview of the study period (SPIRIT Fig. 2013)

Full size image

All intervention components are facilitated by a trained public health nurse. Public health nurses [3] were selected for training and delivery of the intervention by the local public health unit, in consultation with the primary investigator, through an existing collaboration with SickKids Hospital and Toronto Public Health. The nurses were trained in parenting skills, and health behaviors, and had expertise in child obesity prevention and management. For this study, the nurses meet biweekly with the study team to discuss any feedback regarding the intervention. Parenting group session topics will include optimizing healthy behaviors and providing parents with parenting skills training. The parenting skills sessions are based on the Chicago Parent Program, an evidence-based program for parents and children to prevent and treat regulatory problems in young children and promote social, emotional, and academic competence [22]. General parenting topics to be covered will include persistence and emotion coaching, praise and social coaching, routines and rules, limit setting and follow through, and calm-down strategies. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all sessions will be delivered virtually over secure video conferencing (i.e., Zoom or Webex).

The coaching visits will be approximately 30–40 min long and delivered by a public health nurse. The coaching visits will integrate health messages and parenting skills addressed in other intervention components and encourage families to incorporate healthy nutrition and health behaviors individualized for their unique home and family environments through effective parenting practices learned in the program. The public health nurse will also link participants to local community resources where appropriate to support individual child and parental health and mental health identified during the coaching visits; referral will be facilitated by tools such as the Toronto Early Childhood and Family Resource System [23]. Finally, the coaching visits will be used to discuss participant progress, set and monitor personalized goals, and answer any questions. The criteria for a participant to discontinue the intervention are completed through participant request. The outcome data to be collected for participants who discontinue from intervention protocols is the same outcome data as those who attend the intervention parenting sessions (regardless of the degree of participation).

Control

The control group children and parents will receive the usual care. In Ontario, the usual care for this population consists of individual well-child health clinic visits guided by the Rourke Baby Record. Participants in the control group are being offered to participate in future virtual group sessions after the 12-month follow-ups are complete.

Data collection and management

Trained research assistants will facilitate the collection of questionnaire data, physical measurements, accelerometry data, and blood tests. These questionnaires will be completed on paper or electronically, according to parent preference. REDCap, a secure web-based application, will be used to capture data. Non-fasting blood work will be obtained by trained personnel according to the TARGetKids! protocol [24, 25]. To address public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, if children and parents are unable to attend the primary care setting at enrollment, parents will perform height and weight measurements using standardized equipment with instructions sent to their home. Blood tests are only collected if the child attends the clinic visit. A trained health professional experienced with pediatric blood collection will collect the small blood sample (approximately 9–12 ml/2–3 teaspoons of blood) from the child’s arm using a needle. Blood, saliva, and stool samples will be sent to the Mount Sinai Services laboratory where they will be examined. Test results will be kept in the database at the Applied Health Research Centre and a copy of the blood test results will be sent to your child’s doctor. Once these tests have been completed, any leftover samples will be transported to the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute for biobanking and future research. Future research may include hereditary genetic testing to look at whether a certain condition runs in families. The collection of these samples is a necessary part of this Registry. Samples will not be sold and will be used only for purposes approved by the Research Ethics Board. To protect the identity (privacy) of participants, samples will be de-identified and labeled with a study identification number, first name, birth month/year, and the date that the sample was collected prior to storage. This means that any identifying information, such as a participant’s first name and birth month/year, will be removed once they are received by the research team. Samples will be stored only with the participant ID. The researchers will collect information about participants’ medical history from their doctor’s records and will enter this information into an electronic database. The data will be securely stored and will be maintained by the Applied Health Research Centre at St. Michael’s Hospital. The database can only be accessed by people who are involved in this research. To gather information about healthcare use, research data will be securely transferred and linked to other databases, like the Ontario health administrative data held at ICES. Participant research data, which will be transferred, will include participant’s OHIP number, mother’s name, father’s name, child’s name, date of birth, and postal code. The information will be securely transferred as coded information, only for the purpose of linkage. Any direct identifiers such as the health card number or name will be removed or replaced with a code that is not known to study investigators.

Data monitoring

This intervention is considered to be of the low-risk nature. Based upon the Research Ethics Office at St. Michael’s Hospital (Toronto, ON) guidelines, because of this low-risk nature of the intervention, a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) was not required.

Potential study harms

Evidence suggests that serious adverse events (SAEs) are not anticipated in this specific trial design. However, there is the chance that minor SAEs may occur. Minor SAEs include, but are not limited to, parent’s concern regarding confidentiality, parents questioning the reasoning behind their child’s recruitment for the study (i.e., Child is at risk for obesity), and any conflict that may arise in the group facilitation sessions. These potential minor SAEs will be reported to the Research Ethics Office at St. Michael’s Hospital.

Trial auditing

To review trial conduct, the PARENT Trial project management team meets on a biweekly basis where status updates are shared, and decisions are finalized around plans for the study. In addition, the PARENT Trial project coordinator meets with the TARGetKids! Operations Team on a weekly basis to share updates around the PARENT trial, discuss strategies and issues in relation to the cohort, innovate (with the other programmers, developers, coordinators, and clinical research specialists in attendance), and resolve any runway issues pertaining to the project database and/or data collection.

Statistical analysis of clinical data

Appropriate descriptive statistics for baseline characteristics (frequencies and proportions for discrete variables; means and standard deviations for symmetric variables; and medians and inter-quartile ranges for skewed data) will be used to compare groups. The principle of intention-to-treat will be applied to the analysis of outcomes. Outcome variables will be compared between arms using ANCOVA with the corresponding baseline measure as the covariate. For the primary outcome, the following additional covariates will be included: age and each of the risk indicators—(i) birth weight greater than 3500 g, (ii) weight gain in the first year of life, (iii) maternal or paternal obesity, (iv) smoking during pregnancy, and (v) mean family income less than $80,000. Mean differences and corresponding confidence intervals will be calculated. A two-sided level of 0.05 will be applied for the primary outcome. To determine if the treatment effect on the primary outcome depends on baseline BMI, the interaction term between the treatment group and baseline BMI will be added to the covariate model. If this term is significant at the 0.1 level, then sub-groups determined by baseline BMI will be examined.

Sample size

The sample size calculation is based on an ANCOVA for the primary outcome zBMI at 12 months, using the baseline zBMI as a covariate. The total sample size of 108 (54 per arm) is based on the following criteria: a two-sided, level 0.05 test of the null hypothesis of no difference; power of 0.80; smallest clinically important difference is 0.5 zBMI units at 12 months; between-subject standard deviation is 1 unit; and within-subject correlation is 0.638, derived from TARGetKids! dataset of subjects meeting criteria (n > 700). Lost-to-follow-up is estimated at 10% [26, 27]. Obesity intervention trials in young children with 15–50 children per group have demonstrated significant treatment effect sizes of 0.3–0.5 units of zBMI [10].

Feasibility and acceptability

Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with parent participants in the intervention and control groups to assess their experiences with the intervention, perceived quality of the intervention, and barriers and facilitators to their participation. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis will be conducted.

Fidelity to the core components of the intervention will be measured by the public health nurses following each group session and coaching visit using fidelity checklists and reported using descriptive statistics.

Economic evaluation analysis

Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated by dividing the incremental costs between the intervention and usual care arms by the incremental change in the child’s zBMI between baseline and the end of the follow-up period. A probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation will be used to establish a point estimate and 95% confidence interval of the ICER. Extensive sensitivity analysis will be used to examine the robustness of the results and evaluate uncertainty in each of the parameters in the analysis. Ranges for the sensitivity analysis will be obtained from 95% confidence intervals generated from study data for each of the parameters. This analysis will be conducted in accordance with guidelines set out by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health [28].

Parent-oriented research approach

Parents participating in the TARGetKids! network have reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed study protocol and recruitment methods via a Parents’ Panel [29]. The Parents’ Panel was developed to engage parents involved in TARGetKids! research and gather their perspectives on proposed ongoing research. The Parent Panel will be engaged throughout the trial to support the interpretation of results and knowledge translation.

Knowledge translation

TARGetKids! is a collaboration between child health researchers, primary care practitioners (pediatricians and family physicians), parents, and their children. This study incorporates an integrated knowledge translation approach through continuous engagement with practicing primary care clinics and public health nurses in the TARGetKids! network and with parents. At end-of-grant, study findings will be communicated to key knowledge users including parents, health professionals and organizations (primary care physicians and public health practitioners), decision- and policy-makers, and other researchers. The research team will actively engage with policy-makers early in the execution of the trial to ensure the program is scalable and feasible from a health policy perspective. Reporting of outcomes in peer-reviewed manuscripts will be guided by STaRI standards [30].

Discussion

There are a few practical and operational issues that have been taken into consideration throughout the conduction of this trial. There have been challenges with coordinating the group sessions, to find a time that is appropriate for all parents attending these sessions. Due to COVID-19, the group sessions transitioned to online delivery which may have allowed an increase in program attendance. Recruitment into the trial was delayed due to COVID-19, as the primary method for recruitment is conducted in clinical practice. Participant uptake of coaching calls has also posed a challenge, as some participants are not always interested in attending these calls. To mitigate this, we have not made the coaching calls mandatory but encouraged by the public health nurse. One last challenge in terms of recruitment for this trial is the eligibility criteria. Participants included in this trial are those that have children who are at risk of developing obesity, which may present as a sensitive topic to discuss with a participant (parent) during initial enrolment. To aid in this discussion, we have implemented a script to guide our research assistants when communicating with the parent surrounding the topic of weight bias.

Trial status

Protocol version number and date: 05 Jan 2021

Start date of recruitment: May 1, 2018

Estimated completion date of recruitment: April 15, 2023

Availability of data and materials

The final trial dataset will be available to study investigators and the Research Ethic Boards at all participating sites. The datasets analyzed during the current study and statistical code are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, as is the full protocol.

Abbreviations

ANCOVA:

Analysis of Covariance

ICER:

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

RCT:

Randomized Control Trial

TARGetKids!:

The Applied Research Group for Kids

zBMI:

Body Mass Index z-score

References

  1. Canning P, et al. Obesity in a Provincial Population of Canadian Preschool Children: Differences between 1984 and 1997 Birth Cohorts. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(1):51–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477160601124613.

  2. Shields M, Tremblay MS. Canadian Childhood Obesity Estimates Based on Who, IOTF and CDC Cut-Points. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5(3):265–73. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477160903268282.

  3. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(13):869–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reilly JJ, et al. Progression from Childhood Overweight to Adolescent Obesity in a Large Contemporary Cohort. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;2(2-2).  https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2010.497538.

  5. Olshansky SJ, et al. A Potential Decline in Life Expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;(60)7:450–452. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000167407.83915.e7.

  6. Hering E, Pritsker I, Gonchar L, Pillar G. Obesity in children is associated with increased health care use. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009;48(8):812–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, et al. What Childhood Obesity Prevention Programmes Work? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(7):547–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12277.

  8. Taveras EM, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Clinical-Community Childhood Obesity Interventions. JAMA Pediatr.  2017;171(8). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1325.

  9. Gerards SM, et al. The Effectiveness of Lifestyle Triple P in the Netherlands: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122240. 

  10. Haines J, et al. Healthy Habits, Happy Homes: Randomized Trial to Improve Household Routines for Obesity Prevention among Preschool-Aged Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(11):1072. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2356.

  11. Wen LM, et al. Effectiveness of Home Based Early Intervention on Children's BMI at Age 2: Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ. 2012;344:no. jun26 3.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3732.

  12. Sherwood NE, et al. Healthy Homes/Healthy Kids: A Randomized Trial of a Pediatric Primary Care-Based Obesity Prevention Intervention for at-Risk 5–10year Olds. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;36(1):228–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.017.

  13. Chan AW, et al. Spirit 2013 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for Protocols of Clinical Trials. BBMJ. 2013;346:e7586. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586.

  14. Qiao Y, et al. Birth Weight and Childhood Obesity: A 12-Country Study. Int J Obes  Suppl. 2015;5(S2). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijosup.2015.23.

  15. Weng SF, et al. Estimating Overweight Risk in Childhood from Predictors during Infancy. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3858.

  16. Whitaker KL, et al. Comparing Maternal and Paternal Intergenerational Transmission of Obesity Risk in a Large Population-Based Sample. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(6):1560–67. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28838.

  17. Morandi A, et al. Estimation of Newborn Risk for Child or Adolescent Obesity: Lessons from Longitudinal Birth Cohorts. PLoS One. 2012;7(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049919.

  18. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2016 Census Toronto [Census Metropolitan Area], Ontario and Ontario [Province]. Census Profile, 2016 Census - Toronto [Census Metropolitan Area], Ontario and Ontario [Province]. 2021. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CMACA&Code1=535&Geo2=PR&Code2=35&Data=Count&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All.

  19. Promoting Optimal Monitoring of Child Growth in Canada: Using the New World Health Organization Growth Charts – Executive Summary. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;15(2):77–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/15.2.77.

  20. de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Onyango AW, Frongillo EA, Martines J. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004.

  21. Proctor E, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2010;38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

  22. Gross D, et al. Efficacy of the Chicago Parent Program with Low-Income African American and Latino Parents of Young Children. Prev Sci. 2008;10(1):54–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0116-7.

  23. Toronto Early Childhood and Family Resource System - Home. Toronto Early Childhood and Family Resource System - Home, http://healthykidstoronto.ca/.

  24. Carsley S, et al. Cohort Profile: The Applied Research Group for Kids (Target Kids!). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;44(3):776–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu123.

  25. Anderson LN, et al. Duration of Fasting, Serum Lipids, and Metabolic Profile in Early Childhood. J Pediatr. 2017;180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.005.

  26. Edwards LK. Unified Power Analysis for t-Tests through Multivariate Hypotheses. Applied Analysis of Variance in Behavioral Science, M. Dekker, New York, 1993.

  27. Faul F, et al. G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.

  28. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada - 4th Edition. CADTH; 2017. https://www.cadth.ca/guidelines-economic-evaluation-health-technologies-canada-4th-edition.

  29. Vanderloo LM, et al. Parent Engagement in Co-Design of Clinical Trials: The Parent Trial. Trials. 2021:22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6.

  30. Pinnock H, Sheikh A. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (STARI): Enhancing Reporting to Improve Care. Npj Prim Care Respir Med. 2017;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0045-7.

  31. Chan AW, et al. Spirit 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.

  32. De Onis M. Who Child Growth Standards Based on Length/Height, Weight and Age. Acta Paediatr. 2003;95:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x.

  33. Datar A,  Sturm R. Childhood Overweight and Elementary School Outcomes. Int J Obes. 2006;30(9):1449–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803311.

  34. Bisset S, et al. Predicting Academic and Cognitive Outcomes from Weight Status Trajectories during Childhood. Int J Obes. 2012;37(1):154–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.106.

  35. CFDCA P. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES III), in Anthropometric Procedures Video. 2003.

  36. de Onis M, et al. The Who Multicentre Growth Reference Study: Strategy for Developing a New International Growth Reference. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1_suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265040251s104.

  37. Kelly AS, et al. Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Young Adulthood from the Metabolic Syndrome, Its Component Risk Factors, and a Cluster Score in Childhood. Int J Pediatr. 2011;6(2-2). https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2010.528765.

  38. Tremblay MS, Connor Gorber S. Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(6):453–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03405437.

  39. Birken CS, et al. Parental Factors Associated with Screen Time in Pre-School Children in Primary-Care Practice: A Target Kids! Study. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(12):2134–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980011000516.

  40. Randall Simpson JA, et al. Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (Nutristep™): Validation and Test–Retest Reliability of a Parent-Administered Questionnaire Assessing Nutrition Risk of Preschoolers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;62(6):770–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602780.

  41. Larouche R, et al. Outdoor Time, Physical Activity and Sedentary Time among Young Children: The 2012–2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can J Public Heal. 2016;107(6). https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.107.5700.

  42. Bornstein DB, et al. Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity Levels of Preschoolers: A Meta-Analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(6)504–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.05.007.

  43. Borkhoff CM, et al. Objectively Measured Physical Activity of Young Canadian Children Using Accelerometry. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(12):1302–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0164.

  44. Goodman R. Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.

  45. Stone LL, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010;13(3):254–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2.

  46. Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition. PsycTESTS Dataset; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1037/t11523-000.

  47. Rothbart MKA, Hershey K, Fisher P. Investigations of temperament at 3–7 years: the Children’s Behaviour Questionnaire. Child Dev. 2001;72:1394–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Arnold DS, et al. The Parenting Scale: A Measure of Dysfunctional Parenting in Discipline Situations. Psychol Assess. 1993;5(2):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.137.

  49. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. PsycTESTS Dataset; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01004-000.

  50. Abidin RR. Parenting Stress Index. PsycTESTS Dataset; 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02445-000.

  51. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure. Psychiatr Annals. 2002;32(9):509–15. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parents were involved at several stages of the trial, including the design, intervention, management, conduct, and authorship. We received input from parents with young children participating in the TARGetKids! cohort and have published this work (Kim et al. Engaging parents to research childhood interventions aimed at preventing common health problems. CMAJ (2018), 190 (Suppl) S22-S23; https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180323 and Vanderloo et al. Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial. Trials (2021), 22, 347; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6). We have also carefully assessed the barriers and facilitators of the trial interventions on participants. We intend to disseminate the main results to trial participants and cohort participants and will seek parent involvement in the development of an appropriate method of dissemination with our parent and clinician advisory committee.

The authors would like to thank the children participants and their families for their participation in this study as well as all clinicians who are currently involved in the TARGetKids! practice-based research network.

*TARGetKids! Collaborators – Co-Leads: Catherine S. Birken, Jonathon L. Maguire; Advisory Committee: Ronald Cohn, Eddy Lau, Andreas Laupacis, Patricia C. Parkin, Michael Salter, Peter Szatmari, Shannon Weir; Science Review and Management Committees: Laura N. Anderson, Cornelia M. Borkhoff, Charles Keown-Stoneman, Christine Kowal, Dalah Mason; Site Investigators: Murtala Abdurrahman, Kelly Anderson, Gordon Arbess, Jillian Baker, Tony Barozzino, Sylvie Bergeron, Dimple Bhagat, Gary Bloch, Joey Bonifacio, Ashna Bowry, Caroline Calpin, Douglas Campbell, Sohail Cheema, Elaine Cheng, Brian Chisamore, Evelyn Constantin, Karoon Danayan, Paul Das, Mary Beth Derocher, Anh Do, Kathleen Doukas, Anne Egger, Allison Farber, Amy Freedman, Sloane Freeman, Sharon Gazeley, Charlie Guiang, Dan Ha, Curtis Handford, Laura Hanson, Leah Harrington, Sheila Jacobson, Lukasz Jagiello, Gwen Jansz, Paul Kadar, Florence Kim, Tara Kiran, Holly Knowles, Bruce Kwok, Sheila Lakhoo, Margarita Lam-Antoniades, Eddy Lau, Denis Leduc, Fok-Han Leung, Alan Li, Patricia Li, Jessica Malach, Roy Male, Vashti Mascoll, Aleks Meret, Elise Mok, Rosemary Moodie, Maya Nader, Katherine Nash, Sharon Naymark, James Owen, Michael Peer, Kifi Pena, Marty Perlmutar, Navindra Persaud, Andrew Pinto, Michelle Porepa, Vikky Qi, Nasreen Ramji, Noor Ramji, Danyaal Raza, Alana Rosenthal, Katherine Rouleau, Caroline Ruderman, Janet Saunderson, Vanna Schiralli, Michael Sgro, Hafiz Shuja, Susan Shepherd, Barbara Smiltnieks, Cinntha Srikanthan, Carolyn Taylor, Stephen Treherne, Suzanne Turner, Fatima Uddin, Meta van den Heuvel, Joanne Vaughan, Thea Weisdorf, Sheila Wijayasinghe, Peter Wong, John Yaremko, Ethel Ying, Elizabeth Young, Michael Zajdman; Research Team: Farnaz Bazeghi, Marivic Bustos, Charmaine Camacho, Dharma Dalwadi, Christine Koroshegyi, Tarandeep Malhi, Sharon Thadani, Julia Thompson, Laurie Thompson; Project Team: Mary Aglipay, Imaan Bayoumi, Sarah Carsley, Katherine Cost, Anne Fuller, Laura Kinlin, Jessica Omand, Shelley Vanderhout, Leigh Vanderloo; Applied Health Research Centre: Christopher Allen, Bryan Boodhoo, Olivia Chan, David W.H. Dai, Judith Hall, Peter Juni, Gerald Lebovic, Karen Pope, Kevin Thorpe; Mount Sinai Services Laboratory: Rita Kandel, Michelle Rodrigues.

Committee contributions

The Trial Steering Committee (TSC) for the current study is comprised of 4–6 individuals, including the principal investigator of the study, project manager, project coordinator, public health nurse, and graduate student(s). This group meets biweekly, to discuss the trial’s progress, barriers of recruitment/data collection, and any inquiries related to the data management of the trial. There is another group within our research network that meets biweekly, which includes all research assistants from the primary care practice sites involved in the recruitment for the study, to discuss all items related to the recruitment of the study. The primary care practice site research assistants are responsible for the recruitment, consent distribution, and data collection for the study. Finally, a group of parents (referred to as the PACT Parent Partnership) who have children that participate in research studies conducted by our primary research network meet with principal investigators and the research team once a month. These meetings are of great importance as it allows the team to gain perspective from the parents who take part in the study. Please see https://www.targetkids.ca/pact for further information.

Sponsorship

This trial is sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Contact details: 55 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8. Telephone: 416–813-1500 Website: sickkids.ca.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit (OSSU) grant (grant number not applicable), PSI Foundation grant number 19–25, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada grant number G-19–0026347. The funders of this work had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Sarah Rae & Catherine Birken

  2. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Sarah Rae, Melanie Barwick, Frank Ong, Andrew Willan & Catherine Birken

  3. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Jonathon Maguire, Mary Aglipay & Nav Persaud

  4. Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

    Jonathon Maguire & Jess Haines

  5. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Melanie Barwick & Andrew Willan

  6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Melanie Barwick

  7. Department of Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Karoon Danavan, Michelle Porepa & Catherine Birken

  8. Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Jennifer Jenkins

  9. Toronto Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Marie Klaassen

  10. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Myla E. Moretti & Catherine Birken

  11. Clinical Trials Unit, Ontario Child Health Support Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Myla E. Moretti

  12. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Centre for Urban Health Solutions and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Nav Persaud

  13. Department of Pediatrics, St Michael’s Hospital, Pediatric Research, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Sharon Straus

  14. Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Erika Tavares

Authors
  1. Sarah Rae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathon Maguire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary Aglipay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melanie Barwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karoon Danavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jess Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jennifer Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marie Klaassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Myla E. Moretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Frank Ong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nav Persaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michelle Porepa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sharon Straus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Erika Tavares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Andrew Willan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Catherine Birken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.S.B and J.M. conceptualized the study and developed the initial foundation for the intervention components. C.S.B and F.O were responsible for the development of the study protocol. C.S.B and A.W. were responsible for the development of the data analysis plan. S.R. and F.O. were responsible for the supplemental material required for the intervention. S.R wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors provided feedback on drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Rae.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The current protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials guidelines [31] and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03219697). This study has received Research Ethics Board (REB) approval from The Hospital for Sick Children, St. Michael’s Hospital, and Toronto Public Health. Informed and written consent is obtained from parents at the point of recruitment. Families who attend TARGetKids! practice sites and meet the study’s inclusion criteria but decline study participation will still receive usual health care. All protocol amendments will be submitted to The Hospital for Sick Children REB.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rae, S., Maguire, J., Aglipay, M. et al. Randomized controlled trial evaluating a virtual parenting intervention for young children at risk of obesity: study protocol for Parenting Addressing Early Years Intervention with Coaching Visits in Toronto (PARENT) trial. Trials 24, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06947-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06947-w

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215