Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

The effect of “moderately restricted carbohydrate” diet on gut microbiota composition and metabolic parameters in women with metabolic syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial



Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a group of risk factors that increase the risk of death and a variety of chronic diseases. Recent studies have indicated that the imbalance of gut microbiota might contribute to development and progression of metabolic syndrome. Carbohydrate restriction in the diet has been proven to be one of the most effective methods in the management of metabolic syndrome, even in the absence of weight loss. However, no study has examined the effects of a carbohydrate-restricted diet on gut microbiota composition in metabolic syndrome patients. Thus, we will examine the effects of a “moderately restricted carbohydrate (MRC)” diet on gut microbiota, insulin resistance, and components of MetS among Iranian women. In addition, the stability of changes in dependent variables, including gut microbiota, will also be assessed.


This is a parallel randomized clinical trial in which 70 overweight or obese women aged 20–50 years with MetS will be randomly assigned to receive either MRC diet (42–45% carbohydrate, 35–40% fats) or a normal weight loss (NWL) diet (52–55% carbohydrate, 25–30% fats) for 3 months. Protein accounted for 15–17% of total energy in both diets. The quantity of gut microbiota including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella, Bacteroidetes, and Akkermansia muciniphila, as well as anthropometric, blood pressure, and metabolic parameters will be measured at study baseline and the end of trail. At the end of this phase, all participants will be placed on a weight maintenance diet for an additional 6 months. After following up study subjects in this duration, all dependent variables will be examined again to assess their stability over this period.


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet on gut microbiota composition and several metabolic parameters during the weight loss and maintenance phases in women with MetS.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (, IRCT20210307050621N1). Registered on May 31, 2021.

Peer Review reports


Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a group of metabolic abnormalities that include hyperglycemia, hypertension, elevated triglyceride levels, low HDL cholesterol levels, and abdominal obesity. Each of these abnormalities contribute to an increased risk of developing a variety of non-communicable diseases and mortality [1, 2]. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is increasing as obesity rates rise globally; by 2030, it is predicted that near 50% of the population will be obese, with half of them suffering from severe obesity [3, 4]. In line with obesity trends, approximately 35% of US adults have MetS [5, 6]. In Iran, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is estimated to be around 31% in adult population [7]. In addition, Iranian women are more likely than women in western nations to suffer from this syndrome [8].

Over the last decade, evidence inspired by gut microbiota studies has revealed the possibilities and challenges of novel metabolic syndrome prevention and treatment strategies [9]. The human microbiota consists of over 100 trillion symbiotic microorganisms that live on and within humans, and it contains roughly 150 times the number of genes found in the human genome [10, 11]. There has been a long history of mutually beneficial interactions between the gut microbiota and the mammalian host, and this has led to the development of an intricately intertwined symbiotic relationship that affects a wide range of physiological functions [12]. To understand the rise in the metabolic syndrome prevalence, one must consider the rapid changes in our environment, which have a negative impact on factors such as sedentary behavior and dietary habits [13]. Apart from several other factors including genetics, diet is considered to be the most influential factor affecting the alterations in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota [14, 15]. These factors, by mediating alteration in the gut microbiome composition, may have an effect on the immune and metabolic systems, thereby influencing the risk of MetS [16]. The gut microbiota composition of patients with MetS differs from that of healthy individuals, which has been linked to changes in intestinal permeability, inflammation, obesity, and insulin resistance [17, 18]. Dysbiosis, defined as an imbalance of gut microbiota, is implicated in the development of the metabolic syndrome [19]. Dysbiosis results in a loss of microbial diversity, the eradication of beneficial microorganisms, and the spread of potentially pathogenic microorganisms [20]. The role of gut dysbiosis in the development of immune system dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease has been examined extensively in many studies [19, 21].

Diet plays a crucial role in the development and composition of the gut microbiota. Various dietary factors influence the gut microbiota. Among others, the quantity and balance of macronutrients (carbohydrates, protein, and fat) have attracted a particular attention [22]. Dong et al. found that a calorie-restricted high protein diet had beneficial effects on microbial diversity and alteration in Akkermansia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., as well as the loss of Prevotella spp., when compared to baseline [23]. On the other hand, a high-carbohydrate diet has been linked to dysbiosis and an increase in anaerobic pathogen species, most notably Bacteroides [24]. No specific diet has been recommended to manage patients with MetS so far. Several studies have demonstrated that the Mediterranean and DASH diets are effective at reducing insulin resistance and other components of metabolic syndrome [25, 26]. However, none of these diets have focused on the dietary macronutrient composition. Despite the worldwide recommendation on reduced fat intake, the prevalence of this syndrome has increased [27]. Therefore, it seems that the advice on low fat diets, in spite of their beneficial effects on some components of this syndrome, might not be an appropriate choice for managing metabolic syndrome [28]. High-protein diets have also been linked to kidney dysfunction, acidosis, and insulin resistance [29]. However, dietary carbohydrate restriction might be a suitable choice because earlier studies have shown that consumption of this dietary pattern has been resulted in improved components of MetS, even in the absence of weight loss [30]. Furthermore, low-carbohydrate diets outperform low-fat diets in terms of weight loss and adipose tissue reduction [31, 32]. This is particularly relevant in Middle Eastern countries, where people get more than 60% of energy from carbohydrates, in particular from refined sources [33]. High carbohydrate intake has also been blamed as one of the primary causes of the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranians [34]. In this regard, Rajaie et al. conducted a randomized crossover clinical trial in which they applied a carbohydrate-restricted diet by substituting dietary fats; this regimen contained 43–47% carbohydrate and 36–40% dietary fat. After 3 months of follow-up, a moderate-restricted carbohydrate diet reduced blood pressure, waist and hip circumferences, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome [35]. To the best of our knowledge, no earlier study has examined the effect of such dietary pattern on the gut microbiome composition in patients with metabolic syndrome. Understanding the diversity and composition of gut microbiome will aid researchers in developing novel MetS prevention and treatment strategies. As a result, the aim of this study is to (i) determine the effect of a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet on gut microbiota composition and metabolic parameters in women with metabolic syndrome and (ii) determine whether these potential changes in the gut microbiota will be sustained during a subsequent six-month weight maintenance phase.

Material and methods

The present study is a parallel two-phase randomized controlled clinical trial that will be conducted at Shariati Hospital in Tehran, Iran. All participants must complete and sign an informed written consent form prior to completing their registration (Supplementary file, section A). Ethical approval has been obtained by the Bioethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1400.200).

Study population

The current single-blind randomized controlled trial is a two-phase community-based research project. Participants will be recruited through a popular online advertising program rather than a health care center or hospital. This will be done to better reflect population diversity and produce more generalizable results across populations.

Inclusion criteria

This study will be conducted on adult women with metabolic syndrome who have body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 25 and aged 20–50 years. MetS was defined as having three of the five conditions listed in the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-ATP III) [36]: (1) waist circumference of more than 88 cm (35 inches), (2) serum triglyceride (TG) level greater than 150 mg/dL, (3) serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level of less than 50 mg/dL, (4) blood pressure greater than 130/85 mm Hg, and (5) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels greater than 100 mg/dL. Patients who reside in Tehran will be included in the study to minimize loss to follow-up. This study will only include women because it has been demonstrated that women are more likely than men to maintain dietary changes and adhere to the prescribed diet regimen after participating in a dietary intervention trial [35, 37].

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet the following criteria will be excluded from the study: (1) pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant in the near future; (2) being current smokers or using other tobacco such as hookah; (3) evidence of some pathologic conditions such as liver, kidney, thyroid, and gastrointestinal tract diseases as well as suffering from diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, severe infection, and trauma; (4) weight loss history surgery; (5) having a severe allergy to specific foods; (6) have been on a special diet or taken weight loss medication for three months prior to the study; and (7) consumed antibiotics, pre- or probiotic products or supplements 3 months prior to enrollment. We will also exclude postmenopausal women, participants who are unwilling to continue the intervention and have poor adherence to the prescribed (their dietary records show that their intake deviates more than 300 kcal from the prescribed amount, or dietary records show that the recommended macronutrient composition is not followed), and those who become infected with COVID-19 during the intervention. Figure 1 presents a schematic representation of the overall research plan.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study process

Sample size calculation

Using a type I error of 5% (α = 0.05) and a type II error of 20% (β = 0.20, power = 80%), and serum HDL-C concentrations as the key variable, the sample size in this study was calculated using the following formula, which has been proposed for parallel clinical trials:

$$n=\frac{2\left[{\left({\textrm{Z}}_{1-\frac{\alpha }{2}}+{\textrm{Z}}_{1-\beta}\right)}^2\times {\upsigma}^2\right]}{{\textrm{d}}^2}$$

n = sample size for each group.

σ = The variance (SD) for mean HDL-C concentrations was as 3.5, which was calculated using the average SDs reported for serum HDL-C in Rajaie et al. study [35].

d = The minimal clinically important difference for HDL-C was set at 2.5, based on previous research [38].

Overall, using this formula and assuming a 10% drop-out rate in each group, we will require a sample size of 35 subjects in each group.

Study design

A total of 100 women with metabolic syndrome will be screened according to the aforementioned inclusion criteria in the initial phase. After recruiting participants from online advertisements and social media, seventy women who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the entire project. Patients will be enrolled using a stratified block randomization procedure with a block size of 4. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups based on stratification by age (20–30, 30–40, and 40–50 years) and BMI (25–29.9, 30–34.9, and > 35 kg/m2). First, we will enroll a woman in a stratum that meets the inclusion criteria. Following that, the second person matched based on these variables with the first one will be placed in the same stratum. Consequently, two participants with similar characteristics (for the aforementioned variables) would be in the same stratum (Supplementary file, section B). Finally, using a random allocation software, two subjects from the same strata will be randomly assigned to either moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (MRC) or normal weight loss (NWL) diet groups. The principal investigator (SMM) will enroll eligible women. All participants will sign a consent form before inclusion in the study, in which information about the prescribed diets, duration of the study, and contact information for the research team are provided. Study participants will be informed that the services given to them will be free of charge and that they can withdraw from the study at any time throughout the study. Each person will receive a booklet, including a pre-designed dietary plan containing a series of menus and recipes for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks according to the prescribed diet. In the current trial, outcome assessors will be blinded to the intervention allocation. The study protocol for this clinical trial was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials in advance (IRCT20210307050621N1). The flow diagram of the research process is presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Enrollment, interventions, and assessments at various points in time. The “X” denotes what has been accomplished during a specified time period. Mth, month


Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the two above-mentioned groups. During an hour-long discussion, each participant will be instructed on either the MRC diet or NWL diet. All participants will receive a calorie restricted diet based on their status of weight and BMI (300–500 kcal less than participant’s energy requirement). We will compute calorie requirements based on resting energy expenditure (using the Harris-Benedict equation) and physical activity levels. The main distinction between these two diets will be the proportion of calories derived from fats and carbohydrates. The MRC diet will be defined as 42–45% of energy from carbohydrates and 35–40% from fats, while the NWL diet will be defined as 52–55% of total calories from carbohydrates and 25–30% from fats. In fact, 10% of energy from carbohydrates in the MRC diet will be substituted with non-hydrogenated vegetable oils. Dietary protein intakes will be accounted for 15–17% of total energy across both dietary groups. The first phase of the study in which subjects will receive the aforementioned diets will last for 3 months. Then participants will enter the second phase, in which all participants will be followed for another 6 months on a weight-maintenance (WM) diet containing a normal proportion of macronutrients, including 52–55% carbohydrates, 27–30% fat, and 15–17% protein. The main objective of this phase is to determine whether the changes caused by the intervention will be maintained after six months. In addition, it will be determined if changes in gut microbiota persist after 6 months of a weight-maintenance diet and to what extent these changes might contribute to weight maintenance and the stabilization of metabolic variables after 6 months.


To assess how well participants adhere to their diets, their dietary intakes will be recorded once every 2 weeks in the first phase and every 4 weeks in the second phase by telephone interview. A sample of dietary recall format is provided in Supplementary file, section C. In total, participants are going to complete 12 dietary records (six in the first phase and six in the second phase). Participants will be asked to report their dietary intakes using household measures in order to complete the dietary recalls. Then, we will convert household measures to grams using the booklets provided. Participants’ total dietary intakes will be assessed using the average of all dietary recalls taken over the duration of the intervention. Total energy intake, macronutrients, and micronutrients will be computed from the dietary recalls using Nutritionist-IV software (First Databank, San Bruno, CA, USA) modified for Iranian dishes. We will also send text messages and make phone calls to participants throughout the study to increase compliance and prevent forgetfulness of diet principles.

Intervention safety

There have been no serious side effects associated with moderate carbohydrate restriction diets. To investigate any potential side effects, we will ask participants to report any changes during the study period concurrent with their dietary assessment via phone interview.

Assessment of variables

A standard questionnaire will be used to collect data on participants’ age, ethnic origin, marital status, educational level, disease history, family history of disease, medication use, and history of COVID-19 and type of vaccination. We will also measure primary outcomes including serum lipid profile concentrations, fecal bacterial load, and glucose levels, as well as secondary outcomes including anthropometric measurements and blood pressure at the beginning of the study, end of the phase I (3 months), and end of the phase II (6 months).

Biochemical assessments

A blood sample will be taken from each patient’s venous blood at the study baseline, end of the first phase (after 3 months), and end of the second phase of the study (after 9 months) following 12 h of fasting. We will use a portion of the blood sample to evaluate glucose levels and lipid profile. The remaining serum will be kept at – 80 °C until it is further analyzed for insulin levels. Plasma glucose and lipid profile concentrations (TC, HDL, LDL, and TG) will be determined via an enzymatic colorimetric method using commercial kits. Finally, the serum insulin concentrations will be examined using electrochemiluminescence (ECL) method. We also will determine insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI) formulas.

Stool samples and gut microbiota assessment

A 10-g stool sample will be collected from each participant at study baseline, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after the end of intervention using a stool specimen collection kit that will be brought to the clinic in ice packs within 4 h. Until fecal microbial analysis, stool samples will be frozen at – 80 °C in the laboratory. To minimize changes in the quantity of fecal bacteria, we will collect stool samples in one of three ways: first, we will invite patients to visit the laboratory on the day of fecal sampling. The lab will be equipped with all of the necessary equipment to collect fecal samples. The second method requires the patient to transport the sample to the laboratory within 4 h of their sampling. Finally, if the patient is unable to complete any of the prior approaches, they should contact the study researchers, who will collect their sample at their home and transfer it within 4 h to the lab.

DNA extraction from 200 mg of frozen stool samples will be done using a FavorPrep Stool DNA Isolation Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech Corp., Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted bacterial DNA purity and concentration will be determined by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop, USA). All the extracted DNAs will be stored at − 20 °C freezer until further analysis. Additionally, the quantity of fecal bacteria, including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella, Bacteroidetes, and Akkermansia muciniphila, will be determined using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in duplicate. We selected the taxa based on their association with metabolic syndrome and their ability to balance the gut microbiota [39, 40]. Specific primers targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA genes blasted in NCBI will be used in the current study. Each reaction mixture is composed of SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, China), the specific forward and reverse primers, and a DNA template. The thermal cycling conditions will be as follows: an initial DNA denaturation step at 95 °C for 1 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. Finally, in order to confirm the specificity of the amplification products, melting curve analysis will be performed by slowly cooling the PCRs from 95 °C to 60 °C.

Anthropometric measures

Weight will be determined with the minimum clothing without shoes using a weighing calibrated scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest 100 g. Standard stadiometer will be used to measure barefoot standing height to the nearest 0.5 cm. Measurement of the waist and hip circumferences will be done to the nearest 0.5 cm using a strip tape measure over light clothing without applying pressure to the body surface. The waist and hip circumferences will be defined as the circumference around the belly button and the diameter of the hip’s largest point. The body mass index (BMI) will be calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the height in meters squared.

Blood pressure assessment

After at least 5-min resting, measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be done twice with 15-min intervals in the right arm using a mercury barometer calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Industrial Research. The average of two blood pressure readings will be used to determine an individual’s blood pressure.

Physical activity assessment

We will determine the level of physical activity of participants based on their once in a month physical activity recording (including working and non-working days) (Supplementary file, section D). Physical activity levels will be classified as low, moderate, or high and expressed in metabolic equivalents per week (MET-min/week).


The information about participants will be stored anonymously according to TUMS rules. During laboratory tests and in all records, participants will only be able to be identified by their ID number so as to assure their privacy and confidentiality. In a secure database, we will store participants’ identifying information separately from the research data collected during the study. Moreover, all specimens will be stored in the TUMS biochemistry laboratory. All study data will be kept strictly confidential on password-protected computers in the research team’s office, which will be accessible only by the research team. The corresponding author will provide anonymized data to other researchers in order for them to conduct secondary studies after the trial has been completed on reasonable request.

Data management and monitoring

Principal study coordinators will be SMM and BL, who have designed the study and will be responsible for project oversight. In fact, the Trial Steering Committee (TSC) is comprised of AE and BL as key members, the study physician (SHR), the study assistant and study advisor (SDS), the statistician and study advisor (HSE), and the principal investigator (SMM). Monthly meetings of this committee will be held to assess performance and progress, overcome technical and financial challenges, and develop plans to meet project deadlines. A separate data monitoring committee is not required due to the low-risk nature of the intervention. The laboratory of the Endocrine and Metabolism Research Institute at Tehran University of Medical Sciences serves as the coordinating canter, where blood sample, serum collection, storage, and all laboratory testing are conducted. Main investigator (SMM) is responsible for coordinating visits for identifying potential participants and obtaining consent. There will be a Data Management Team comprising the principal investigator (SMM) and the project supervisors (AE and BL).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses will be carried out using the SPSS software version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For addressing non-adherence, the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be applied [41]. Moreover, we will apply the last observation carried forward method (LOCF) to handle missing values [42]. In order to determine the normal distribution of variables, we will use the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, histogram, and Q-Q plot. We will log transform (ln) the data, if necessary, to achieve normal distribution. Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Chi-square test and independent samples t-test will be used for comparing continuous and categorical variables between the two groups, respectively. We also will use the paired-sample t test for within-group comparisons. Repeated measures analysis of variance will be employed to determine the impact of the intervention on the outcome variables. These analyses will examine the effects of the intervention, time, and the interaction between time and intervention. Any potential differences in baseline levels of outcome variables, dietary intakes, and physical activity will be controlled in these analyses. Statistical significance will be defined as P values less than 0.05.


Metabolic syndrome is currently regarded as one of the most important leading causes of non-communicable diseases, and its global prevalence is rapidly increasing, imposing a considerable burden on the health care system [43]. Obesity caused by dietary changes is the leading cause of metabolic disorders, which might eventually lead to diabetes and heart disease [44]. Carbohydrate-restricted diets, despite lacking a precise definition, have attracted considerable attention in recent decades due to their widespread use for weight loss and weight management [45]. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome composition are currently being considered as one of the potential risk factors of MetS [46]. It has been established that approximately 100 trillion bacteria and other microbes reside in the human gut microbiome [46]. Humans and microbes have a long evolutionary history, and numerous microbes have a significant impact on human health. However, technological advancements have drastically changed environmental conditions. Many of these changes are quite significant [47]. Among these, the relationship between diet and gut microbiome composition has received more attention [48]. Recent dietary changes including a high carbohydrate intake have been linked to decreased microbiome diversity, increased inflammation, and an increased risk of metabolic disease and may have contributed to the development of MetS [18]. Since metabolic syndrome is caused by a complex interaction between the underlying causes and the complications, employing a safe and functional dietary intervention combined with a practical delivery method to halt the rapid increase in metabolic syndrome prevalence would be effective.

In this study, we hypothesize that following a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet would decrease MetS components by inducing changes in the gut microbial community. The findings of the present study may shed light on the implementation of an appropriate dietary strategy to facilitate and accelerate weight loss and improve metabolic syndrome components.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first clinical trial examining the effect of a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet on the composition of gut microbiota and several metabolic parameters in patients with MetS. It should be noted that the intervention is low-cost and no extra charge would be imposed to patients. Stratified block randomization will be used to match patients based on a number of confounding variables that may influence the outcomes. Additionally, participants will be recruited through public announcements. Thus, all volunteers may be encouraged to adhere to dietary recommendations. Another potential strength of the study is the measurement of gut microbiota composition and biochemical parameters not only during the intervention but also after the intervention, during the maintenance phase. Dietary intakes and physical activity will be evaluated during both phases of the study as well.

There are several limitations to this study that should be considered. The major limitation of the current trial is the small number of bacterial species and biochemical parameters that will be examined. Moreover, we are concerned about gut microbiota changes during sample collection. In order to prevent this, stool samples will be collected in the laboratory and immediately frozen at − 80 °C. In addition, we strive to have all stool samples delivered to the laboratory within 4 h of collection. Nevertheless, several samples may arrive within more than four hours. Even though biomarkers could provide more accurate measures for validating dietary records, we will not use them to evaluate diet compliance due to financial constraints. This study will be conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which could increase the number of participants who are lost to follow-up.

Trial status

The recruitment phase in the trial began in December 2021 and is ongoing. We anticipate the recruitment to end in June 2022. Protocol modifications will be communicated to all relevant parties, and the Iranian Clinical Trials Registry will be updated accordingly (

Availability of data and materials

Any data to support the protocol can be provided upon request by corresponding author.



Metabolic syndrome


Moderately restricted carbohydrate


Normal weight loss


High-density lipoprotein


Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension


Panel III guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program


Fasting plasma glucose


Body mass index






Last observation carried forward method


Standard deviation


Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index


Hemostatic model assessment of insulin resistance




  1. Xu H, Li X, Adams H, Kubena K, Guo S. Etiology of metabolic syndrome and dietary intervention. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;20(1).

  2. Ju S-Y, Lee J-Y, Kim D-H. Association of metabolic syndrome and its components with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Medicine. 2017;96(45):e8491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, et al. Projected US state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2440–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, Trogdon JG, Pan L, Sherry B, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):563–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ervin RB. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index; United States, 2003-2006; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012. JAMA. 2015;313(19):1973–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Farmanfarma KK, Kaykhaei MA, Adineh HA, Mohammadi M, Dabiri S, Ansari-Moghaddam A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iran: a meta-analysis of 69 studies. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2019;13(1):792–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalvand S, Niksima SH, Meshkani R, Gheshlagh RG, Sadegh-Nejadi S, Kooti W, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Iranian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(4):456.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489(7415):220–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ursell LK, Haiser HJ, Van Treuren W, Garg N, Reddivari L, Vanamala J, et al. The intestinal metabolome: an intersection between microbiota and host. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1470–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Hara AM, Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(7):688–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brunkwall L, Orho-Melander M. The gut microbiome as a target for prevention and treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: from current human evidence to future possibilities. Diabetologia. 2017;60(6):943–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkahtani S, Elkilany A, Alhariri M. Association between sedentary and physical activity patterns and risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Saudi men: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Song M, Chan AT. Environmental factors, gut microbiota, and colorectal cancer prevention. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(2):275–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen DS, Krych Ł, Buschard K, Hansen CH, Hansen AK. Beyond genetics. Influence of dietary factors and gut microbiota on type 1 diabetes. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(22):4234–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dabke K, Hendrick G, Devkota S. The gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. J Clin Investig. 2019;129(10):4050–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang P-X, Deng X-R, Zhang C-H, Yuan H-J. Gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Chin Med J. 2020;133(7):808.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Croci S, D’Apolito LI, Gasperi V, Catani MV, Savini I. Dietary strategies for management of metabolic syndrome: role of gut microbiota metabolites. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, Corfe BM, Owen LJ. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26(1):26191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen C, Round JL. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(7):1024–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Parekh PJ, Balart LA, Johnson DA. The influence of the gut microbiome on obesity, metabolic syndrome and gastrointestinal disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6(6):e91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeffery IB, O’Toole PW. Diet-microbiota interactions and their implications for healthy living. Nutrients. 2013;5(1):234–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong TS, Luu K, Lagishetty V, Sedighian F, Woo S-L, Dreskin BW, et al. A high protein calorie restriction diet alters the gut microbiome in obesity. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhute SS, Mefferd CC, Phan JR, Ahmed M, Fox-King AE, Alarcia S, Villarama JV, Abel-Santos E, Hedlund BP. A high-carbohydrate diet prolongs dysbiosis and clostridioides difficile carriage and increases delayed mortality in a hamster model of infection. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e01804–21.

  25. Esposito K, Giugliano D. Mediterranean diet and the metabolic syndrome: the end of the beginning. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010;8(3):197–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi T, Azizi F. Beneficial effects of a dietary approaches to stop hypertension eating plan on features of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(12):2823–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang D-H, et al. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(4):899–906.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Volek JS, Feinman RD. Carbohydrate restriction improves the features of metabolic syndrome. metabolic syndrome may be defined by the response to carbohydrate restriction. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2005;2(1):31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mandayam S, Mitch WE. Dietary protein restriction benefits patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology. 2006;11(1):53–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Muzio F, Mondazzi L, Harris WS, Sommariva D, Branchi A. Effects of moderate variations in the macronutrient content of the diet on cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese patients with the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(4):946–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feinman RD, Volek JS, Westman EC. Dietary carbohydrate restriction in the treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Clin Nutr Insight. 2008;34(12):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hyde PN, Sapper TN, Crabtree CD, LaFountain RA, Bowling ML, Buga A, et al. Dietary carbohydrate restriction improves metabolic syndrome independent of weight loss. JCI Insight. 2019;4(12):e128308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kimiagar SM, Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar Rad A, Hormozdyari H, Zellipour L. Food consumption pattern in the Islamic Republic of Iran and its relation to coronary heart disease; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Esmaillzadeh A, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Whole-grain intake and the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in Tehranian adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(1):55–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rajaie S, Azadbakht L, Khazaei M, Sherbafchi M, Esmaillzadeh A. Moderate replacement of carbohydrates by dietary fats affects features of metabolic syndrome: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Nutrition. 2014;30(1):61–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Radakovich K, Heilbrun LK, Venkatranamamoorthy R, Lababidi S, Klurfeld DM, Djuric ZJN, et al. Women participating in a dietary intervention trial maintain dietary changes without much effect on household members. Nutr Cancer. 2006;55(1):44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bradley R, Kozura E, Buckle H, Kaltunas J, Tais S, Standish LJ. Description of clinical risk factor changes during naturopathic care for type 2 diabetes. J Altern Complement Med (New York, NY). 2009;15(6):633–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lim MY, You HJ, Yoon HS, Kwon B, Lee JY, Lee S, et al. The effect of heritability and host genetics on the gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Gut. 2017;66(6):1031–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Festi D, Schiumerini R, Eusebi LH, Marasco G, Taddia M, Colecchia A. Gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(43):16079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7211):670–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shao J, Zhong B. Last observation carry-forward and last observation analysis. Stat Med. 2003;22(15):2429–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saklayen MG. The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mazidi M, Pennathur S, Afshinnia F. Link of dietary patterns with metabolic syndrome: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7(3):e255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu T, Yao L, Reynolds K, Niu T, Li S, Whelton P, et al. The effects of a low-carbohydrate diet on appetite: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26(6):476–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gildner TE. Links between metabolic syndrome and the microbiome. Evol Med Public Health. 2020;2020(1):45–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Flandroy L, Poutahidis T, Berg G, Clarke G, Dao M-C, Decaestecker E, et al. The impact of human activities and lifestyles on the interlinked microbiota and health of humans and of ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2018;627:1018–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Leeming ER, Johnson AJ, Spector TD, Le Roy CI. Effect of diet on the gut microbiota: rethinking intervention duration. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank everyone who will be participating in this trial.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and members of the general public were not involved in formulating the research question, study, recruitment, conduct, or report. After the study, we will distribute the results via social media to the participants.


This study will be funded by grants from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (No. 52047) and Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (No. 966).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SMM, BL, and AE contributed to the conception and design of the study. HSE, SHR, and SDS contributed to the design and methodology development. SMM and HM contributed to the manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Esmaillzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences has approved this clinical trial (IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1400.200). All participants will sign written informed consent before enrollment in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: A.

Consent form. B. Randomization procedure diagram. C. Food recall. D. Physical activity record.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mousavi, S.M., Ejtahed, HS., Malmir, H. et al. The effect of “moderately restricted carbohydrate” diet on gut microbiota composition and metabolic parameters in women with metabolic syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 23, 959 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: