Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

AGI grade-guided chaiqin chengqi decoction treatment for predicted moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (CAP trial): study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pragmatic clinical trial

Trials volume 23, Article number: 933 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common digestive disease with increased incidence globally but without internationally licenced pharmacological therapy. Moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP/SAP) contributes predominately for its morbidities and mortality and has been managed in West China Hospital for decades using the traditional Chinese medicinal formula chaiqin chengqi decoction (CQCQD). The current study tests whether the early administration of CQCQD will result in improved clinical outcomes in predicted MSAP/SAP patients.

Methods

This is a single-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind pragmatic clinical trial. AP patients aged 18–75 admitted within 72 h of onset will be assessed at admission for enrolment. We excluded the predicted mild acute pancreatitis (Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score > 2 at admission) and severe organ failure (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score of respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal systems > 3) at admission. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to CQCQD or placebo control administration based on conventional therapy. The administration of CQCQD and placebo is guided by the Acute Gastrointestinal Injury grade-based algorithm. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of respiratory failure (SOFA score of respiratory system ≥ 2) within 28 days after onset. Secondary outcome measures include occurrence of new-onset any organ failure (SOFA score of respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal system ≥ 2) and new-onset persistent organ failure (organ failure lasts > 48 h), dynamic surrogate biochemical markers and clinical severity scores, gut-centred treatment modalities, local complications status, intensive care need and duration, surgical interventions, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Follow-up will be scheduled on 6, 12, and 26 weeks after enrolment to assess AP recurrence, local complications, the requirement for surgical interventions, all-cause mortality, and patient-reported outcomes.

Discussion

The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence to appraise the efficacy of CQCQD for the early management of AP patients.

Trial registration

Chictr.org.cn Registry (ChiCTR2000034325). Registered on 2 July, 2020.

Peer Review reports

Administrative information

Note: the numbers in curly brackets in this protocol refer to SPIRIT checklist item numbers. The order of the items has been modified to group similar items (see http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/)

Title {1}

AGI grade-guided chaiqin chengqi decoction treatment for predicted moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (CAP trial): study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pragmatic clinical trial

Trial registration {2a and 2b}.

Chictr.org.cn Registry (ChiCTR2000034325). Registered on 2 July, 2020. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=55591

Protocol version {3}

The current protocol is version 1, dated December 10, 2019.

Funding {4}

This study is supported by Project of Sichuan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2020ZD004) and NZ-China Strategic Research Alliance 2016 Award, Ministry of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2016YFE0101800).

Author details {5a}

Zhiyao Chen, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Xiaonan Yang, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Jia Guo, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Tao Jin, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Ziqi Lin, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Ping Zhu, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Jing Li, Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Ling Li, Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Xin Sun, Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Dan Du, West China-Washington Mitochondria and Metabolism Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Centre for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Kun Jiang, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yanqiu He, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Fei Cai, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Lan Li, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Cheng Hu, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Qingyuan Tan, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Wei Huang, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Liverpool Pancreatitis Research Group, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Lihui Deng, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Qing Xia, West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b}

Sichuan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

No. 15 Yongxing Alley, Chengdu 61000, China.

Role of sponsor {5c}

The study sponsor is not involved in study design, collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data. The sponsor will not be involved in writing the report of the decision to submit the report for publication.

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a}

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas [1]. The common causes of AP such as gallstones, alcohol, hypertriglyceridaemia, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and various drugs trigger self-digestion of acinar cells and induce local and systemic inflammation. It has an increasing prevalence with an overall incidence of over 34 affected cases per 100,000 person-years [2]. Most of the patients are uneventful and recover from mild disease (mild acute pancreatitis, MAP), or pull through local complications or transient organ failure defined as moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP). Approximately 15–20% of patients manifesting persistent organ failure (POF) are defined as severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) [3], which are at risk of multiple organ failure (MOF) and the mortality can be up to 50% [4, 5]. Despite the global socioeconomic burden of disease, currently, there are no specific and effective therapeutic agents available to treat AP [6]. According to published guidelines [7, 8], supportive measures, such as analgesia, fluid therapy, nutritional supplementation, and organ support, remain the primary management modalities for AP patients.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which contains abundant multiple-target biologically active substances, has been broadly used in many countries and regions. Gastrointestinal dysmotility or dysfunction/failure, one of the common and complex complications in AP [9,10,11], is widely accepted as an important role in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammation and MOF [12,13,14]. Most TCM herbal formulas, such as dachengqi decoction [15, 16], qingyi decoction [17, 18], and rhubarb [19, 20], are used as an important “gut-centred” therapeutic strategy in the early treatment of AP [21]. Based on TCM theories, we summarised that the key pathogenesis of SAP-MOF is the invasion of “evil heat” to the organs, and its treatment requires “clearing heat, removing toxin, and purging the bowel” in clinical practice [22, 23]. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and trials with small sample sizes have demonstrated the effectiveness of rhubarb-contained TCM in reducing inflammatory markers, organ failure, local complications, and mortality, albeit the included clinical trials are of low quality [24,25,26].

Chaiqin chengqi decoction (CQCQD) has been modified from dachengqi decoction and used to treat AP in our hospital for over 30 years [27, 28]. The comprehensive approach integrated by TCM and Western medicine improved clinical outcomes and reduced the mortality of SAP to 19.6% [29]. Our previous studies demonstrated that CQCQD can restore intestinal motility or ameliorate systemic inflammation via the toll-like receptor 4 and inflammasome-mediated pro-inflammatory pathways in AP models [23, 30].

Aiming to restoration or maintenance of gastrointestinal function, the Acute Gastrointestinal Injury (AGI) grade-based algorithm will be used to guide the administration of CQCQD [11]. Our trial protocol, informed consent, and other documents were submitted to the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC) of West China Hospital of Sichuan University in February 2020. After revisions, ethical approval was obtained on 22 June, 2020. The trial was registered with an identifier (ChiCTR2000034325) at chictr.org.cn on 2 July, 2020.

Objectives {7}

Owing to the lack of sufficient strength of the current evidence, we designed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to provide high-quality evidence of the efficacy of CQCQD for patients with AP (CAP trial).

Trial design {8}

This study is a single-centre double-blind, parallel-design, pragmatic, placebo-controlled randomised trial. The study flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. The trial framework is exploratory.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart. CQCQD, chaiqin chengqi decoction; AGI, acute gastrointestinal injury; BISAP, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis; GCS: Glasgow Criteria System; IAP: intra-abdominal pressure; QD: once daily; TID: three times a day; Q6H: every 6 h; Q4H: every 4 h; Q2H: every 2 h

Full size image

The protocol follows the recommendations of Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 1) [31, 32]. The Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary Framework-2 (PRECIS-2) (Additional file 2), a validated tool for decision making and discussion of trial design, was used to help us design this pragmatic trial and judge whether these design decisions were fit for our purpose of designing a pragmatic trial [33]. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) has been used as frameworks of methodology to design this protocol [34].

Methods: participants, interventions and outcomes

Study setting {9}

Patients with AP will be recruited through the Pancreatitis Centre Ward of West China Hospital. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the treatment or control group with the ratio of 1:1.

Eligibility criteria {10}

The CAP trial focuses on eligible patients with predicted MSAP and SAP who are admitted within 72 h of onset. A patient will be considered eligible if he/she meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet any of the exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

Patients will be included if they fulfil all the following criteria:

  1. (1)

    Meet the diagnostic criteria of AP [3], which fulfil two of the following three items: typical symptoms and signs of abdominal pain, elevated serum amylase and/or lipase at least three times the upper limit of normal, and AP characteristic image findings.

  2. (2)

    Aged between 18 and 75 years, male or female.

  3. (3)

    Admitted to Pancreatitis Centre Ward within 72 h of disease onset.

  4. (4)

    Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with any of the following conditions will be excluded:

  1. (1)

    Known pregnant or lactating at admission.

  2. (2)

    The presence of severe organ failure identified using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring by a score of > 3 for individual organs (respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal systems) at admission [35].

  3. (3)

    The predicted MAP defined as a Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score (HAPS) > 2 at admission [36].

  4. (4)

    Known malignant tumour or having radiotherapy and chemotherapy within 6 months.

  5. (5)

    Known gastrointestinal perforation, bleeding, and mechanical ileus at admission.

  6. (6)

    Acute attack of chronic pancreatitis.

  7. (7)

    Known history of neoplasm in duodenal or biliopancreatic systems.

  8. (8)

    Known history of pancreatic resection.

  9. (9)

    Known undergoing other clinical trials.

  10. (10)

    Known taking TCM orally before enrolment.

Who will take informed consent? {26a}

Before enrolment, consents for this study are obtained from each patient or his/her next of kin with full information regarding the possible adverse effects of the experimental drug and potential consequences. They will be told about the equal chance of allocation to any one of the two groups before signing the informed consent form. Meanwhile, they will be given enough time to decide whether they join the trial or not. At last, patients will be included voluntarily by signing written informed consent by research assistants.

Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}

On the consent form, participants will be asked whether they agree to the use of their data and biological specimens. Participants will also be asked to consent to the research team sharing relevant data with regulatory authorities, as appropriate. No identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants are presented here or will be presented in reports of the trial results. Informed consent forms are available, on request, from the corresponding authors.

Interventions

Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}

Conventional treatment regimen

All patients will receive standard treatment according to recently published guidelines [7, 8], including fluid therapy, nutritional supplementation, routine medical treatment such as proton pump inhibitors, analgesia and antibiotics as indicated, organ supportive therapy, and ERCP if necessary. Nasogastric and annal tubes will be used for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). For patients with persistent ACS or new-onset organ failure, percutaneous drainage of ascites and surgical abdominal decompression will be considered [37, 38]. When pancreatic infection occurs, either a surgical or endoscopic step-up approach considering the location of the necrotic collection and the technical availability will be applied.

Study herbal formulation

The prescription of CQCQD was developed by this research team and standardised to contain 13 Chinese medicines, the contents of which can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 The ingredients list of standardised Chinese herbal medicine prescription of CQCQD
Full size table

Due to the absence of a positive control drug for AP and the difficulty in preparing a placebo for the decoction, we will utilise a low-dose arm administering 10% CQCQD of similar colour and odour by adding dextrin and colourant, which intend to mimic the placebo group as a control [39]. Generally, the selection of control in a pragmatic trial is usually based on conventional or standard treatment, and placebo is not routinely used as a control. However, the placebo is applied in our trial for following the reasons: (1) The standard treatment for AP including analgesia and fluid therapy is needed in all AP patients and cannot be used only in the control group. (2) Placebo control is designed in our trial to minimise the expectant effect of participants and researchers, as well as to control bias caused by psychological factors from researchers, participants, and evaluators.

The raw herbal drugs with quality certificates will be supplied by Chengdu Kangmei Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Co., Ltd., China. Quality-controlled CQCQD and placebo decoctions will be prepared by the Department of Pharmaceutical Preparation of West China Hospital using the Good Manufacturing Practice standards, according to the 2005 Edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method is used for the quality control of CQCQD. The preparation of the CQCQD and placebo is prepared by two independent pharmacists. During the procedure, a double check will be made by the pharmacist and the researcher. Finally, CQCQD and placebo decoctions will be labelled with computerised numbers to prevent the intervention and control from mixing up. The study decoction preparations will be transported to the inpatient ward and dispensed by two individual research assistants. Researchers will provide the study decoction solution for free. Study investigators and subjects do not know which decoction preparation will be used.

Intervention description {11a}

Administration of randomised drugs guided by the AGI-based algorithm

The AGI grade has been widely used to assess gastrointestinal injury in patients with acute critical illness [11, 40]. Evidence has shown that the AGI grading system is useful for identifying the severity of gastrointestinal dysfunction/failure in AP [41]. In our study, the participants will receive randomised drugs guided by the AGI-based algorithm (Fig. 1).

  1. (1)

    Initiation: If the Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score or Glasgow Criteria System (GCS) < 2 at allocation [42, 43], the patients will empirically receive CQCQD or placebo 200 mL oral intake (or intragastric infusion) and enema, 3 times a day. If the patients have a BISAP/GCS score ≥ 2 at allocation, they will be required to receive urethral catheterisation to monitor intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) every 4 h, which is the key index in AGI grade. The dosage and frequency of decoction is determined by AGI grading according to the following criteria: (1) if AGI grade = 1, 200 mL CQCQD or placebo is administered orally (or intragastrical infusion) and enema, 3 times a day; (2) if AGI grade = 2, CQCQD or placebo is given 100 mL orally (or intragastrical infusion) and 200 mL enema, every 6 h; (3) if AGI grade = 3, CQCQD or placebo are given 100 mL orally (or intragastric infusion) and 200 mL enema, every 4 h; (4) if AGI grade = 4, CQCQD or placebo is given 100 mL orally (or intragastric infusion) and 200 mL enema, every 2 h. If the patient with a BISAP/GCS score ≥ 2 at allocation rejects urethral catheterisation, the initial administration of the randomised drug is in accordance with AGI grade 1, and the conditions will be reassessed for further judgement.

  2. (2)

    Continuation: AGI grade is evaluated daily at 7–8 am by the researchers. The dosage and frequency of CQCQD or placebo are determined by the corresponding AGI grade at the time points.

  3. (3)

    Termination: CQCQD or placebo is administered for at least 5 days and no more than 14 days. IAP monitoring will be terminated if it is less than 15 mmHg for two consecutive days. CQCQD or placebo will be terminated, if AGI grade < 1 for two consecutive days, or normally oral refeeding without discomfort. Other conditions will be determined by clinical treatment leaders and principal investigators.

  4. (4)

    The upgrade principle for patients with AGI grade 1 initially or who reject urethral catheterisation: (1) the aggravation of abdominal distension and constipation; (2) the occurrence of new organ dysfunction; (3) the deterioration of the original organ function; and (4) other conditions will be assessed and determined by clinical treatment leaders and principal investigators.

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}

The patients are withdrawal if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. (1)

    Having manifestations of gastrointestinal perforation, bleeding, mechanical ileus, severe haemorrhoids, and anal fissure which require restricted fast and enema.

  2. (2)

    Quitting voluntarily.

  3. (3)

    Adverse medical events occurring during the study, such as severe hypernatremia, intolerance to critically worsening conditions, or other reasons as judged by the investigators, which might make the patient unlikely to complete the study.

Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}

Although flex of experimental intervention adherence is used (Additional file 2), efforts will be made to improve adherence to intervention: patient education (educate patients about the necessity of urethral catheterisation to monitor IAP, educate their individual risk of disease-related complications) and medication-taking reminders (researchers monitor and reminder the frequencies and volume of medication).

Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}

During hospitalisation, the patients are not allowed to use other Chinese medicines and alternative therapies (e.g. herbal extract injection, acupuncture, abdominal ultrasound therapy). Drugs for inhibitory gastrointestinal motility (e.g. catecholamines, sedatives) and prokinetics (e.g. neostigmine, domperidone, metoclopramide, erythromycin) are not used routinely unless the patients present with AGI grade 4 or other critical conditions suggested by clinical treatment leaders and principal investigators to ensure the safety of the patients. All the additional drugs or therapies must be recorded in case report form (CRF) in detail.

Provisions for post-trial care {30}

Participants who are discharged and re-admitted within 4 weeks will be regarded as a re-admission for the same episode of care and will be in the same arm as their original allocation. Data of re-admission elsewhere will be collected at follow-up typically at 4 weeks.

Outcomes {12}

Primary outcome measurements

Referring to the existing study results and expert recommendations [6, 28, 29, 44], the duration of respiratory failure (SOFA score ≥ 2 points for respiratory) within 28 days after admission will be served as the primary outcome in the CAP trial.

Secondary outcome measurements

  1. I.

    Secondary outcomes during the index admission

  1. (1)

    The occurrence of new-onset of any organ failure (SOFA score for respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal system ≥ 2 points) or new-onset of POF (organ failure lasts > 48 h). New onset is defined as events that occur after randomisation and not present 24 h before randomisation.

  2. (2)

    Cumulative levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after admission.

  3. (3)

    Levels of albumin, procalcitonin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and neutrophil count on day 0, day 3, day 5, day 7, and day 14.

  4. (4)

    Daily visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain [45].

  5. (5)

    Daily Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System (PASS) score within the 1st week after enrolment [46].

  6. (6)

    Duration (days) of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS ≥ 2 points) [47].

  7. (7)

    Duration (days) of fasting.

  8. (8)

    The requirement of the anal tube.

  9. (9)

    The requirement of prokinetic agents.

  10. (10)

    Duration (days) of gastrointestinal decompression.

  11. (11)

    Duration (days) of IAH and ACS.

  12. (12)

    The receipt of respiratory support and renal replacement therapy.

  13. (13)

    Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stays.

  14. (14)

    Local pancreatic injury by contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (CECT) on days 7 and 14.

  15. (15)

    Potential safety signals.

  16. (16)

    Length of hospital stay.

  17. (17)

    In-hospital cost.

  1. II.

    Secondary outcomes within 26 weeks after enrolment

  1. (1)

    The requirement for catheter drainage or necrosectomy.

  2. (2)

    Infected pancreatic necrosis.

  3. (3)

    All-cause mortality.

  4. (4)

    Self-report health situation by five-level EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) [48].

Participant timeline {13}

The participant timeline is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Study schedule of the CAP trial
Full size table

Sample size {14}

The sample size calculation was based on the following assumptions: a reduction in duration of respiratory failure of 2 days in the treatment group, and a standard deviation of 4.5 days for each group [17, 29]. Assuming that the significance level is 0.05 and the study power is 0.8 (two-sided α = 0.05, β = 0.2), we projected a sample size of 111 patients in each group using Power Analysis & Sample Size software (PASS statistic software, version 11.0.7, NCSS). Considering a 10% dropout rate, a total of 248 patients will be recruited in this trial with 124 patients for each group.

Recruitment {15}

Patients admitted to the Emergency Department of West China Hospital will be primarily screened via the symptoms of abdominal pain and onset time by research nurses. Patients with a diagnosis of AP will be admitted to Pancreatitis Centre Ward for further recruitment.

Assignment of interventions: allocation

Sequence generation {16a}

After the completion of screening measurements and the acquisition of signed consent, eligible participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment or control group. The randomisation code will be automatically created by computer using Analytics Software & Solutions software (SAS, version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc, USA).

Concealment mechanism {16b}

Patients will be randomised using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes, which is the most accessible and straightforward method of maintaining allocation concealment. A group of independent assessors will interview the patients and perform the screening.

Implementation {16c}

Statistician (Ms. Ping Zhu) generated the allocation sequence. Research assistants will continue the enrolment process by screening eligible patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigning participants to interventions.

Assignment of interventions: blinding

Who will be blinded {17a}

All the patients, researchers, and statisticians in this clinical study will be blinded to the treatment assignment and unaware of the actual medications.

Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}

The study blinding will only be broken in a medical emergency when the treating physician believes that the administration of the study drug is associated with the emergency.

Data collect and management

Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}

According to the study schedule shown in Table 2, data will be collected during the index admission and 26 weeks after enrolment. If a participant wishes to discontinue the study drug or the treating physician believes a participant should discontinue the study drug due to medical conditions, the investigator will communicate with the participant and the treating physician to obtain the reasons and record in CRF. Further follow-up will still be performed unless the participant withdraws from the trial.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}

Participants are encouraged to visit the researchers in outpatients on weeks 6, 12, and 26 after enrolment, but they will decide a relatively flexible visiting time or follow-up via telephone. During the follow-up period, participants will receive personalised telephone and online counselling with doctors so that they will receive qualified medical care by the research group. They can emergently contact the researcher (Dr. Lihui Deng) if they have discomfort. Incentives to promote adherence will also be provided (e.g. free registration fees, during follow-up transportation allowances, admission priority due to recurrence or complications of pancreatitis).

Data management {19}

The researchers involved will receive restricted training to ensure that the study process is detailed. Data collection will use a CRF and include source-verifiable data from patient records. CRF will be anonymised and contain no individual patient-identifiable information. Paper copies of the CRF will be stored in a locked cabinet in the Chief Investigator’s office in West China Hospital. All data will be input by the primary investigator or nominated investigators approved by the primary investigator, and a double check will be performed by the research coordinator.

Confidentiality {27}

At the time of recruitment, an unrelated sequence of characters will be used to replace the participant’s identifiable information. The data will be stored in the Pancreatitis Centre Information Records Office and will only be accessible to researchers, data monitors, and the BREC of West China Hospital.

Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation, and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}

Blood samples of participants will be collected on admission and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after admission, and the samples will be transferred and handled by professional biobank technicians. Finally, serum, plasma, and white blood cell samples will be stored in West China Biobanks, certified by the China Human Genetic Resources Management Office (No. [2016]406 and No. [2022]BC0040).

Statistical methods

Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}

Data cleaning and statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician blinded to the whole trial process using the latest version of SAS software. The results of the data will be expressed as the means with ranges, medians with interquartile ranges, or numbers of patients with percentages. The comparison between the individualised CQCQD and control group is the primary interest in this study. Continuous variables are compared using the independent-sample T test or the Mann–Whitney U test (for non-normal distributions). Categorical variables are compared with the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Statistical tests will be two-sided, and P values < 0.05 will be considered significant.

Interim analyses {21b}

Interim analysis is not planned in the CAP trial.

Methods for additional analyses (e.g. subgroup analyses) {20b}

The detailed analysis strategies for subgroup analyses by the severity of AP (severe and nonsevere), age (dichotomised at 60 years old), and aetiologies of AP (hypertriglyceridaemic and non-hypertriglyceridaemic) will be compared using appropriate summary statistics (according to its distribution).

Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}

The data will be analysed based on the full analysis set (FAS), per-protocol set, and safety set. FAS analysis is the basic principle of intention-to-treat, including all the enrolled patients in the trial. Analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles with patients analysed according to randomisation and irrespective of actual use or compliance with the algorithm. The per-protocol analysis is the subset of FAS analysis, which just includes patients who finish the trial completely. The safety set analysis is the set of patients who receive the treatment and have safety assessment. Missing values will be addressed by multiple imputation, having appropriately explored the missingness mechanism and in accordance with good practice.

Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant-level data, and statistical code {31c}

Final data of the trial that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Oversight and monitoring

Composition of the coordinating Centre and trial steering committee {5d}

The trial steering committee consists of four members, who will hold meetings monthly and audit the trial. Dr. Qing Xia, as the primary investigator, will be responsible for the overall management of the trial. Dr. Lihui Deng has expertise in clinical trials and will be the clinical lead in the trial. Dr. Wei Huang has expertise in biological specimen management and will lead the biobank platform for the trial. Dr. Dan Du is an expert who will ensure the quality control of CQCQD.

Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}

An Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (IDSMC) consists of two clinical experts and one statistician, who are responsible for overseeing the safety and quality of the data. The committee is independent and has no competing interests with the research. The IDSMC will consider protocol adherence, trial withdrawal, and safety monitoring and will make recommendations for continuation of the trial.

Adverse event reporting and harms {22}

Adverse events (AEs) are defined in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The common aberrations in symptoms, signs, and laboratory values due to the severity of the underlying disease and the impact of standard therapies will not necessarily constitute an AE unless they require significant intervention or are of concern in the investigator’s clinical judgement. If severe adverse events (SAEs) happen that threaten the patients’ safety, the researcher should stop the study at once, cancel the blinding, and take any measures to rescue the patients’ lives who experience SAE.

All details of any AE/SAE will be documented and reported during the treatment and the follow-ups. Furthermore, SAE will be reported to the principal investigator and the BREC immediately to decide whether the patient should withdraw from the trial.

Frequency and plans for auditing trial conduct {23}

The BREC of West China Hospital will audit the trial process every 3 months.

Plans for communicating important protocol amendments to relevant parties (e.g. trial participants, ethical committees) {25}

Any amendments to the protocol will be submitted to the BREC, who will review and approve the amendments. The protocol amendments will be updated in the clinical trial registry accordingly. In addition, participants will be informed of the protocol amendments.

Dissemination plans {31a}

The results of the trial will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations.

Discussion

Over the past 30 years, the Chinese herbal formula CQCQD has been widely used as an adjunctive therapy of conventional comprehensive treatment for AP in our hospital. A plethora of basic research studies from our group have revealed that CQCQD reduced pro-inflammatory indices and improved pancreatic and multiple organ injuries in experimental AP models [23, 49,50,51,52,53]. However, high-quality evidence from clinical studies to demonstrate its efficacy in AP patients is still lacking. Therefore, the CAP trial is designed to investigate the efficacy of CQCQD in MSAP/SAP, who are most voluntary to gastrointestinal and respiratory failures with substantial morbidities and mortality of AP.

The CAP trial is conducted at Pancreatitis Centre of West China Hospital, an “all-in-one” pancreatitis centre with 74 routine open beds designated for AP patients who are managed by a TCM-led, gastroenterologists and pancreatic surgeons incorporated multiple-discipline team. It is one of the largest single tertiary referral centres in the world admitting over 1800 cases of AP annually. This specific regimen of CQCQD treatment for AP, which limited the extension and application of this pattern to international centres and some other domestic centres. Therefore, the CAP trial is designed as a single-centre study to assure the homogeneity of the study.

Quality control for CQCQD plays a vital role in the trial. Hundreds of characteristic phytochemicals contained in compound formulas pose a challenge for developing robust quality assessment metrics. In a previous study [50], we successfully constructed a multi-strategy-based analytical method and identified potential quality-markers based on drug properties and effect characteristics. The preparation of the decoction is performed by our Department of Pharmaceutical Preparation according to standard operating procedures. Despite qualified materials used for CQCQD preparation, the quality of CQCQD will be assessed by the appropriate content range of the markers. This feasible platform lays the solid foundation for the CAP trial.

Outcome determination is of great importance for the trial. A recent evidence-based study suggested that trials in participants with AP should consider complications or health-related quality of life, but not mortality, as primary outcomes [6]. In the CAP trial, the duration of respiratory failure will be served as the primary endpoint. Respiratory failure constitutes a high proportion of organ failure in AP [4, 29]. In the Zangfu theory of TCM, the lung and the large intestine are interior-exteriorly related. Based on this theory, the method “purging the bowel” could potentially treat pulmonary disease [54]. The CAP trial will employ the AGI-guided algorithm for CQCQD administration to shorten the duration of respiratory failure in the early stage as a primary endpoint for SAP. Most of the secondary endpoints are registered within the index admission and follow-up patients for 6 months.

In conclusion, the CAP trial is the first pragmatic randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of CQCQD in the early management of gastrointestinal and respiratory failures in predicted MSAP/SAP patients. If the CAP trial will be successfully implemented, the results would provide high-quality evidence to appraise the effects of CQCQD in AP patients.

Trial status

The current protocol is version 1, dated December 10, 2019. The trial started to recruit patients on August 1, 2020, and is anticipated to be completed on June, 2023.

Availability of data and materials {29}

Data will be stored in a secure database that can only be accessed by the study chief investigator.

Abbreviations

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

MAP:

Mild acute pancreatitis

MSAP:

Moderately severe acute pancreatitis

POF:

Persistent organ failure

SAP:

Severe acute pancreatitis

TCM:

Traditional Chinese medicine

MOF:

Multiple organ failure

CQCQD:

Chaiqin chengqi decoction

CAP:

CQCQD for AP

AGI:

Acute Gastrointestinal Injury

BREC:

Biomedical Research Ethics Committee

PRECIS-2:

Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary Framework-2

SPIRIT:

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

MAP:

Mild acute pancreatitis

HAPS:

Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score

BISAP:

Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis

GCS:

Glasgow Criteria System

IAP:

Intra-abdominal pressure

IAH:

Intra-abdominal hypertension

ACS:

Abdominal compartment syndrome

CRF:

Case report form

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

CECT:

Contrast-enhanced computerised tomography

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ICU:

Intensive care unit

SIRS:

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

PASS:

Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

EQ-5D-5L:

Five-level EuroQol five-dimensional

IDSMC:

Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee

AEs:

Adverse events

SAEs:

Severe adverse events

FAS:

Full analysis set

References

  1. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1972–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrov MS, Yadav D. Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(3):175–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo Q, Li A, Xia Q, Liu X, Tian B, Mai G, et al. The role of organ failure and infection in necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schepers NJ, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Ahmed Ali U, Bollen TL, Gooszen HG, et al. Impact of characteristics of organ failure and infected necrosis on mortality in necrotising pancreatitis. Gut. 2019;68(6):1044–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moggia E, Koti R, Belgaumkar AP, Fazio F, Pereira SP, Davidson BR, et al. Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):Cd011384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, Falck-Ytter Y, Barkun AN. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(4):1096–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400–15; 16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson R, Andersson B, Andersson E, Axelsson J, Eckerwall G, Tingstedt B. Acute pancreatitis--from cellular signalling to complicated clinical course. HPB (Oxford). 2007;9(6):414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Capurso G, Zerboni G, Signoretti M, Valente R, Stigliano S, Piciucchi M, et al. Role of the gut barrier in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46 Suppl:S46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reintam Blaser A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J, et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM working group on abdominal problems. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(3):384–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. de Jong PR, González-Navajas JM, Jansen NJ. The digestive tract as the origin of systemic inflammation. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. The gut as the motor of multiple organ dysfunction in critical illness. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(2):203–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leaphart CL, Tepas JJ 3rd. The gut is a motor of organ system dysfunction. Surgery. 2007;141(5):563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan MH, Li J, Huang W, Mukherjee R, Gong HL, Xia Q, et al. Modified Da-Cheng-qi decoction reduces intra-abdominal hypertension in severe acute pancreatitis: a pilot study. Chin Med J. 2012;125(11):1941–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang MJ, Zhang GL, Yuan WB, Ni J, Huang LF. Treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis patients with traditional Chinese medicine. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(22):3574–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen W, Yang X, Huang L, Xue P, Wan M, Guo J, et al. Qing-Yi decoction in participants with severe acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Chin Med. 2015;10:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang JW, Zhang GX, Chen HL, Liu GL, Owusu L, Wang YX, et al. Therapeutic effect of Qingyi decoction in severe acute pancreatitis-induced intestinal barrier injury. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(12):3537–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan B, Fu H, Yin J, Xu F. Efficacy of rhubarb combined with early enteral nutrition for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(11):1375–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou Y, Wang L, Huang X, Li H, Xiong Y. Add-on effect of crude rhubarb to somatostatin for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;194:495–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petrov MS. Gastric feeding and "gut rousing" in acute pancreatitis. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29(3):287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Zhang S, Zhou R, Zhang J, Li ZF. Perspectives of traditional Chinese medicine in pancreas protection for acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(20):3615–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen Y, Han C, Liu T, Wang R, Cai W, Yang J, et al. Chaiqin chengqi decoction alleviates severity of acute pancreatitis via inhibition of TLR4 and NLRP3 inflammasome: identification of bioactive ingredients via pharmacological sub-network analysis and experimental validation. Phytomedicine. 2020;79:153328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu X, Xiao W, Kang X, Yu J, Fan Z. The effect of Chinese herbal medicine on non-biliogenic severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155(1):21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiong W, Yiping W, Jinlin Y, Tao G, Zhen G, Pengcheng Z. Chinese medicinal herbs for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2005(1):CD003631.

  26. Wang G, Shang D, Zhang G, Zhang S, Jiang N, Liu H, et al. Effects of QingYi decoction on inflammatory markers in patients with acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Phytomedicine. 2022;95:153738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu XB, Jiang JM, Huang ZW, Tian BL, Hu WM, Xia Q, et al. Clinical study on the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis by integrated traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2004;35(2):204–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jin T, Jiang K, Deng L, Guo J, Wu Y, Wang Z, et al. Response and outcome from fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(11):1082–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi N, Liu T, de la Iglesia-Garcia D, Deng L, Jin T, Lan L, et al. Duration of organ failure impacts mortality in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2020;69(3):604–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang CL, Lin ZQ, Luo RJ, Zhang XX, Guo J, Wu W, et al. Chai-Qin-Cheng-qi decoction and carbachol improve intestinal motility by regulating protein kinase C-mediated Ca(2+) release in colonic smooth muscle cells in rats with acute necrotising pancreatitis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:5864945.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai L, Cheng CW, Tian R, Zhong LL, Li YP, Lyu AP, et al. Standard protocol items for clinical trials with traditional Chinese medicine 2018: recommendations, explanation and elaboration (SPIRIT-TCM extension 2018). Chin J Integr Med. 2019;25(1):71–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001;286(14):1754–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Hebel K, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. The harmless acute pancreatitis score: a clinical algorithm for rapid initial stratification of nonsevere disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(6):702–5 quiz 607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the world Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Siebert M, Le Fouler A, Sitbon N, Cohen J, Abba J, Poupardin E. Management of abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis. J Visc Surg. 2021;158(5):411–19

  39. Zhou Q, Chang B, Chen XY, Zhou SP, Zhen Z, Zhang LL, et al. Chinese herbal medicine for obesity: a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, prospective trial. Am J Chin Med. 2014;42(6):1345–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu B, Sun R, Wu A, Ni Y, Liu J, Guo F, et al. Severity of acute gastrointestinal injury grade is a predictor of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ding L, Chen HY, Wang JY, Xiong HF, He WH, Xia L, et al. Severity of acute gastrointestinal injury grade is a good predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(5):514–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Imrie CW, Benjamin IS, Ferguson JC, McKay AJ, Mackenzie I, O'Neill J, et al. A single-Centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978;65(5):337–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008;57(12):1698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mukherjee R, Nunes Q, Huang W, Sutton R. Precision medicine for acute pancreatitis: current status and future opportunities. Precis Clin Med. 2019;2(2):81–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Buxbaum J, Quezada M, Chong B, Gupta N, Yu CY, Lane C, et al. The pancreatitis activity scoring system predicts clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: findings from a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(5):755–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, Krabbe PF, de Charro F. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2014;17(4):445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Han C, Du D, Wen Y, Li J, Wang R, Jin T, et al. Chaiqin chengqi decoction ameliorates acute pancreatitis in mice via inhibition of neuron activation-mediated acinar cell SP/NK1R signaling pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;274:114029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Liang G, Yang J, Liu T, Wang S, Wen Y, Han C, et al. A multi-strategy platform for quality control and Q-markers screen of Chaiqin chengqi decoction. Phytomedicine. 2021;85:153525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang X, Yao L, Yuan M, Zhang X, Jakubowska MA, Ferdek PE, et al. Transcriptomics and network pharmacology reveal the protective effect of Chaiqin Chengqi decoction on obesity-related alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis via oxidative stress and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:896523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang X, Zhang X, Lin Z, Guo J, Yang X, Yao L, et al. Chaiqin chengqi decoction alleviates severe acute pancreatitis associated acute kidney injury by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress and subsequent apoptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;125:110024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Huang Y, Wen Y, Wang R, Hu L, Yang J, Yang J, et al. Temporal metabolic trajectory analyzed by LC-MS/MS based targeted metabolomics in acute pancreatitis pathogenesis and Chaiqin Chengqi decoction therapy. Phytomedicine. 2022;99:153996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wan MH, Li J, Tang WF, Gong HL, Chen GY, Xue P, et al. The influence of dachengqi tang on acute lung injury and intra abdominal hypertension in rats with acute pancreatitis. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011;42(5):707–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the members from the pancreas multidisciplinary team in West China Hospital of Sichuan University for their continuous support.

Funding

This study is supported by Project of Sichuan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2020ZD004) and NZ-China Strategic Research Alliance 2016 Award, Ministry of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2016YFE0101800).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhiyao Chen and Xiaonan Yang contributed equally to this article as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West China Centre of Excellence for Pancreatitis, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Zhiyao Chen, Xiaonan Yang, Jia Guo, Tao Jin, Ziqi Lin, Ping Zhu, Kun Jiang, Yanqiu He, Fei Cai, Lan Li, Cheng Hu, Qingyuan Tan, Wei Huang, Lihui Deng & Qing Xia

  2. Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Jing Li, Ling Li & Xin Sun

  3. West China-Washington Mitochondria and Metabolism Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Dan Du

  4. Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Centre for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Dan Du

  5. Liverpool Pancreatitis Research Group, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Liverpool, L69 3GE, Liverpool, UK

    Wei Huang

Authors
  1. Zhiyao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaonan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jia Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tao Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ziqi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ling Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kun Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yanqiu He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Fei Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Lan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Cheng Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Qingyuan Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Wei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Lihui Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Qing Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in the study design, read, discussed, revised, and approved the final manuscript. CZ and YX contributed equally to this study as co-first authors. XQ, DL, YX, and HW contributed to the conception and design of the trial. CZ, DL, and XQ drafted the manuscript. ZP, LJ, and LL planned the randomisation and the statistical analysis. CZ, CF, HY, HC, and TQ participated in recruitment and data collection. DD contributed to the quality control of the study drug. YX, GJ, JT, LZ, LL, and JK in charge of the treatment of patients.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lihui Deng or Qing Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate {24}

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the BREC of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (No. 2020107), which is responsible for tracking and monitoring this clinical trial annually. The design of this trial is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Version Edinburgh 2000).

Consent for publication {32}

Not applicable, no details, images, or videos relating to an individual person will be included in the publication.

Competing interests {28}

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

SPIRIT 2013 Checklist: Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents.

Additional file 2.

PRECIS-2 scores of chaiqin chengqi decoction for predicted moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (CAP trial) domains.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Yang, X., Guo, J. et al. AGI grade-guided chaiqin chengqi decoction treatment for predicted moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (CAP trial): study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pragmatic clinical trial. Trials 23, 933 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06792-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06792-x

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215