Skip to main content
Download PDF

Treatment shortening of drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis using high-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion (Hi-DoRi-3): a study protocol for an open-label randomized clinical trial

Trials volume 23, Article number: 666 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The standard treatment regimen for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB), comprising four companion drugs, requires a minimum duration of 6 months, and this lengthy treatment leads to poor adherence and increased toxicity. To improve rates of adherence, reduce adverse events, and lower costs, a simplified and shortened treatment regimen is warranted.

Methods

This study is a multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial of non-inferiority design that compares a new regimen with the conventional regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary TB. The investigational group will use a regimen of high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day) with isoniazid and pyrazinamide, and the treatment will be maintained for 12 weeks after the achievement of negative conversion of sputum culture. The control group will be treated for 6 months with a World Health Organization-endorsed regimen consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin (10 mg/kg/day), ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. The primary endpoint is the proportion of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include time to unfavorable treatment outcome, time to culture conversion on liquid medium, treatment success rate at the end of treatment, proportion of recurrence at 18 months after randomization, time to recurrence after treatment completion, and adverse events of grade 3 or higher during the treatment. We predict a 10% unfavorable outcome for the control group, and 0% difference from the investigational group. Based on 80% verification power and a 2.5% one-sided significance level for a non-inferiority margin of 6%, 393 participants per group are required. Considering the 15% dropout rate, a total of 926 participants (463 in each group) will be recruited.

Discussion

This study will inform on the feasibility of the treatment regimen using high-dose rifampicin with a shortened and individualized treatment duration for pulmonary TB.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04485156. Registered on July 24, 2020.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the most important infectious diseases. Globally, around 5.8 million people fell ill with TB and 1.5 million people died from TB in 2021. Moreover, ~ 25% of the world’s population has latent TB infection [1]. In South Korea, 22,904 TB cases were reported with a notification rate of 44.6 per 100,000 population in 2021 [2]. Although TB remains a global health concern, TB can be cured with medical treatment, and the success rate for drug-sensitive TB can reach 85% [1].

The standard treatment regimen for drug-sensitive TB, which was introduced in the 1980s, consists of four drugs: isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol [3]. While this regimen has proven to be effective, it typically requires a minimum 6-month treatment duration, irrespective of disease severity or extent [4]. This lengthy treatment leads to poor adherence and increased toxicity [5]. To improve rates of adherence, reduce adverse events, and lower costs, several clinical trials have investigated approaches that aim to shorten the treatment duration in TB patients; however, these studies have failed to prove non-inferiority to the standard 6-month regimen, with the exception of a 4-month regimen based on rifapentine and moxifloxacin [6,7,8,9].

To shorten the treatment duration, the sterilizing activity of anti-TB drugs should be taken into consideration, and rifampicin is a cornerstone drug for the maintenance of sterilizing activity. Rifampicin, a derivate of rifamycin, is effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis populations in a dormant state, as well as those undergoing rapid metabolism [3, 10]. Therefore, rifampicin has the potential to shorten treatment duration to less than 6 months [10]. The area under the concentration–time curve and peak concentration of rifampicin showed a more than proportional increase with a dose change from 10 to 35 mg/kg/day [11, 12]. The higher exposure to rifampicin with the dose increment led to a more rapid fall in bacterial loads [11, 12]. Despite these favorable dose–response relationships of rifampicin, the maximal recommended dose is limited to 10 mg/kg/day or 600 mg/day, owing to the concern of adverse events [13]. However, the use of rifampicin at doses higher than the recommended dose did not cause additional serious adverse events [14, 15]. The number of serious adverse events, including hepatotoxicity, was independent of rifampicin dose in two recent randomized controlled trials [14, 15]. According to real clinical practice data from a Dutch cohort, 6–12 months of high-dose rifampicin therapy was safe and well-tolerated in 99% of patients [16].

Based on the literature, we propose a simplified and shortened treatment strategy using high-dose rifampicin. The effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a three-drug therapy using high-dose rifampicin with isoniazid and pyrazinamide will be investigated in comparison with the standard 6-month treatment for TB. The protocol of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label non-inferiority clinical trial, entitled “Treatment shortening of drug-sensitive pulmonary TB using high-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion (Hi-DoRi-3)” is presented here.

Methods/design

Study design

This investigator-initiated study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arm non-inferiority clinical trial. Participants with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB will be randomly assigned to one of two groups at a 1:1 ratio, and the study will be terminated 18 months after randomization.

Setting

Participants will be recruited from eight referral hospitals located in South Korea: (1) Seoul National University Hospital, (2) National Medical Center, (3) Pusan National University Hospital, (4) Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, (5) Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, (6) Severance Hospital, (7) Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, and (8) Chonnam National University Hospital.

Control group

Participants randomized to the control group will receive standard treatment in accordance with the Korean guidelines for TB [17] and the World Health Organization guidelines [4]. Consequently, patients in the control group will be administered isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 2 months, followed by isoniazid, rifampicin, (and ethambutol) for 4 months, comprising a total treatment period of 6 months (Table 1). Although temporary use of secondary anti-TB drugs is permitted in the case of adverse events such as liver toxicity, the total duration of use should be less than 4 weeks. If rifampicin is discontinued because of adverse events, the period of discontinuation must also be less than 4 weeks.

Table 1 Dose and schedule of anti-tuberculous drugs for the control group
Full size table

Investigational group

Participants randomized to the investigational group will be treated with high-dose rifampicin (body weight, dose: < 44 kg, 1200 mg/day; 45–54 kg, 1500 mg/day; 55–64 kg, 1800 mg/day; 65–74 kg, 2100 mg/day; > 75 kg, 2400 mg/day), isoniazid (300 mg/day), and pyrazinamide (body weight, dose: < 50 kg, 1000 mg/day; 50–70 kg, 1500 mg/day; > 70 kg, 2000 mg/day) until culture conversion (liquid medium) is confirmed (Table 2). High-dose rifampicin and isoniazid will be administered until 12 weeks after the date of sputum culture negative conversion. The dosage of rifampicin will be maintained throughout the study duration. Ethambutol will not be included in the initial regimen to reduce the number of pills. However, in the instance that isoniazid or pyrazinamide is discontinued prior to the end of treatment, ethambutol may be added to the treatment regimen if the investigator decides that reinforcement of the drug is necessary. Although temporary use of secondary anti-TB drugs is permitted in the case of adverse events such as liver toxicity, the total duration of use should be less than 4 weeks. If rifampicin is discontinued because of adverse events, the period of discontinuation must also be less than 4 weeks. The study overview is provided in Fig. 1.

Table 2 Dose and schedule of anti-tuberculous drugs for the investigational group
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Study overview

Full size image

Study population

A total of 926 participants with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB will be enrolled in the study (463 participants per group). Adult participants aged between 19–85 years whose sputum (or bronchoscopic specimen) is positive for Xpert MTB/RIF assay or M. tuberculosis culture, and who have been taking any TB medication for no more than 7 days at the time of enrollment, will be included. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) rifampicin resistance confirmed by Xpert MTB/RIF assay; (2) drug resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, or pyrazinamide, confirmed by a drug-susceptibility test; (3) human immunodeficiency virus infection; (4) malignancy needing anti-cancer chemotherapy; (5) chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis; (6) any contraindications for the study drugs (hypersensitivity to the study drugs, biliary obstruction, galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption); (7) current use of drugs, such as indinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, amprenavir, praziquantel, or atovaquone, or any other drugs contraindicated in combination with study drugs, within 1 day before study enrollment, or expected to be used within the following 28 days; and (8) pregnancy, breastfeeding, or pregnancy planned within the following 6 months.

Assignment of interventions: allocation

Sequence generation

The randomization table will be generated and will be reproducible via SAS 9.4 software, using the stratified block randomization method with a stratification factor of (1) acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity and (2) presence of diabetes. The Medical Research Collaborating Center (MRCC) of the Seoul National University Hospital will operate a web-based randomization system remotely.

Allocation concealment mechanism

It is an open-label trial. Both participants and treating physicians will be aware of allocation information.

Implementation

Participants will be provided with a detailed explanation of the purpose, method, and procedure for this study, and written consent for participation in the clinical trial will be obtained. Prior to randomization, participant demographic information, medical history, and physical examination results will be collected, including results of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, AFB smear (including M. tuberculosis culture), chest X-ray, blood test, and urine (or serum) human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; for women of childbearing age) test. After completing the consent procedure, participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the investigational or control group at a ratio of 1:1 in week 0.

Treatment visits

Following enrollment, participants of each group will visit the hospital every 2 weeks until 8 weeks after enrollment. Subsequently, visits will be made every 4 weeks until the end of treatment. The tests performed at each visit will include the following: physical examination, AFB smear and culture using a liquid medium, and blood test. For women of childbearing age, a urine or blood hCG analysis will be performed. Simple chest X-ray will be performed every 4 weeks. Participants who cannot produce sputum will be encouraged to expectorate sputum. If the participants cannot produce sputum, it will not be deemed as protocol violation.

Follow-up

After the end of treatment, visits will be made every 3 months up until 18 months after the enrollment date. The physical examination, AFB smear and culture, and chest X-ray tests will be performed at each visit. The study timeline is shown in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Time line for control group
Full size table
Table 4 Timeline for the investigational group
Full size table

Definitions

Culture of M. tuberculosis will be considered to be converted to negative when two or more consecutive cultures, taken at different visits, are found to be negative in liquid medium. When a participant cannot produce sputum after the first negative culture sputum, they will be considered as having achieved culture conversion. The submission date of the first confirmed negative sputum culture will be regarded as the date of culture conversion. If M. tuberculosis is found to be re-cultured two or more times following a negative culture conversion, this will be termed culture reversion [18]. Treatment success is defined as achieving negative culture conversion and maintaining negative cultures till the end of treatment.

The sum of treatment failure, recurrence, death during treatment (except for accidents and suicide), loss to follow-up, and withdrawal from the study will be designated as “unfavorable outcomes.” Treatment failure will be defined as participants who fail to achieve culture conversion during treatment period, or as participants using second-line anti-TB drugs for more than 4 weeks. Recurrence will be assigned to participants that indicate the presence of M. tuberculosis in sputum cultures for two or more times after the end of treatment.

Adverse events will be defined when undesirable medical events have occurred in participants, irrespective of a causal relationship with the treatment [19]. When adverse events result in death, life-threatening conditions, patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect, the events will be classified as serious adverse events. The severity of each adverse event will be assessed based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 [20].

Study outcomes

The primary outcome is the proportion of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months after randomization.

Secondary outcomes include time to unfavorable treatment outcomes, time to culture conversion on liquid medium, treatment success rate at the end of treatment, proportion of recurrence at 18 months after randomization, time to recurrence after treatment completion, and adverse events of grade 3 or higher during treatment.

Sample size calculation

The objective of this study is to determine whether the new regimen is non-inferior to the existing standard treatment. The primary outcome is an unfavorable treatment outcome at 18 months after randomization. Based on the existing study [21], a 10% unfavorable treatment outcome for the standard treatment (control group) and a 0% difference from the investigational group is assumed. To obtain a study with 80% power and a 2.5% one-sided significance level for the non-inferiority recognition limit of 6%, each group will contain 393 participants. Assuming a 15% dropout rate [22], the total number of study participants will be 926, resulting in 463 participants in each group. In the occurrence of participant withdrawal within 7 days of randomization, replacement participants may be recruited.

Statistical analysis

The results of this trial for outcomes will be analyzed based on intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT (mITT), and per protocol (PP) approaches, with a primary consideration for mITT results. The ITT group will include all participants who are randomized after satisfying eligibility criteria. The mITT group will include participants who are randomized and who have received the study drugs at least once. The PP group will include participants in the mITT group who have completed the standard treatment for at least 20 of the 24 weeks for the control group or those who have completed the planned treatment for at least 10 of the 12 weeks for the investigational group. A safety analysis will be performed based on the safety group, which will include participants who have been administered with at least one dose of the investigational drugs.

For the primary outcome analysis, the frequency of occurrence of unfavorable outcomes in the control and investigational groups will be analyzed, and the incidence rate of unfavorable outcomes (\({\widehat{P}}_{T}, {\widehat{P}}_{C}\)) and the 95% confidence interval will be estimated. In this non-inferiority test, if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in incidence of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months between the investigational and control groups (\({\widehat{P}}_{T}-{\widehat{P}}_{C}\)) is less than 6%, it will be concluded that the investigational group is not inferior to the control group.

For the analysis of time to unfavorable outcome, time to culture conversion, and time to recurrence, the median time of each group will be estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and will be compared with the log-rank test. Treatment success rate and recurrent rate at the end of treatment will be compared with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test between the two groups.

Safety will be assessed based on the occurrence of adverse events during the clinical trial period. The frequency and proportion of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of grade 3 or higher will be summarized and compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Data collection and management

This study will use a web-based electronic case report form (e-CRF) with Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) constructed by the MRCC in collaboration with an outsourced contractor. The e-CRF designed for this study will use dummy variables for user acceptance testing to confirm its validity. During the study, medical personnel not participating in the study will monitor the trial. These personnel will visit study sites to monitor all aspects of the trial, including adherence to the protocol in accordance with Good Clinical Practice, study participant protection, and data accuracy of the study.

Supervision of the trial

A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), composed of two respiratory specialists who have experience treating TB patients and one statistician from another institute with no conflict of interests, will review data every 3 months during the trial. The DSMB could provide recommendations for protocol changes (including advice on continuation or cessation) based on the results.

Confidentiality

The collection and operation of participant personal information in this study is limited to the data necessary for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability testing of the study drug. Data will be carefully collected and operated to comply with relevant data confidentiality laws and regulations and to ensure confidentiality. Paper files containing participant data (including personally identifiable information and copies of signed consent forms) will be securely stored in a locked office on site in locked filing cabinets. Digital files containing participant data will be stored as password-protected files on university-maintained servers. Access to study files will be restricted to authorized personnel only. The items in the present study protocol comply with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist (see Additional file 1).

Provisions for post-trial care

Participants with recurrence will receive standard TB treatment in accordance with guidelines.

Dissemination

Trial results will be communicated to the scientific community via journals and national and international conferences.

Discussion

The Hi-DoRi-3 is a phase 3 open-label, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial that aims to investigate the effectiveness of a high-dose rifampicin-containing regimen for the treatment of drug-sensitive TB. In this study, the effectiveness and safety of a regimen with a shortened and individualized treatment duration will be compared with the standard 6-month regimen for TB treatment. The three-drug intervention regimen will include high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg) with isoniazid and pyrazinamide, which will be administered until culture conversion, followed by 12-week administration of high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid.

In South Korea, the treatment success rate of TB is ~ 90%. While less than 1% of TB patients could not be cured, 5.3–25.2% of TB patients were lost to follow-up [23]. The standard 6-month regimen, comprising four drugs, has remained unchanged for almost 40 years [3]. To enhance compliance and adherence to TB treatment, simple, less toxic, and shorter regimens are needed. With the aim to shorten treatment duration in TB patients, 4-month fluoroquinolone-containing regimens were compared with the standard treatment [7,8,9]; however, non-inferiority of these regimens was not proven.

For the last ~ 40 years, recommendations for the maximal dose of rifampicin have been confined to 10 mg/kg or 600 mg per day [4, 17]. The peak concentration after ingestion of the currently recommended dose of rifampicin is considered to be well above the minimum inhibitory concentration of M. tuberculosis [13]. However, this dose is at the lower end of the dose–response curve, and the drug concentration in M. tuberculosis and at the site of infection has not been considered [13]. Increased rifampicin exposure led to higher bactericidal and sterilizing activity for TB according to several in vitro and in vivo studies [24,25,26]. In human studies, higher doses of rifampicin shortened the time to sputum culture conversion compared with the conventional rifampicin dose [12, 14, 27]. The rate of serious adverse events in patients receiving higher doses of rifampicin was comparable to that in patients receiving the conventional dose [16].

When rifapentine, a cyclopentyl derivate of rifampicin, was administered twice weekly with moxifloxacin for 2 months, followed by 2 months of moxifloxacin, ethambutol, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide, ~ 20% of patients had unfavorable outcomes, and this strategy was proven to be inferior to the standard regimen [8]. Fortunately, a recent study showed that daily administration of 1200 mg of rifapentine with moxifloxacin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide could shorten the treatment duration by up to 4 months without non-inferiority [6]. In our trial, high-dose rifampicin, which is more affordable than rifapentine [28], will be tested as a means to shorten treatment duration. In addition, the total duration of treatment will be individualized according to the timing of culture conversion, which will reflect each patient’s disease severity and treatment response.

In conclusion, our study will inform on the feasibility of a treatment regimen using high-dose rifampicin with a shortened and individualized treatment duration for pulmonary TB.

Trial status

Recruitment began at the first site in November 2020 and is expected to be completed by August 2025.

Availability of data and materials

The results of this trial will be disseminated only by presentation at academic meetings or publication in academic journals.

Abbreviations

AFB:

Acid-fast bacilli

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event

e-CRF:

Electronic case report form

DSMB:

Data and Safety Monitoring Board

hCG:

Human chorionic gonadotropin

mITT:

Modified intention-to-treat

MRCC:

Medical Research Collaborating Center

PP:

Per protocol

REDCAP:

Research Electronic Data Capture

TB:

Tuberculosis

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021.

  2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Annual Report on the Notified Tuberculosis in Korea. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox W, Ellard GA, Mitchison DA. Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3(10):S231–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Guidelines for treatment of drug-sensitive tuberculosis and patient care. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birch S, Govender V, Fried J, Eyles J, Daries V, Moshabela M, et al. Does treatment collection and observation each day keep the patient away? an analysis of the determinants of adherence among patients with Tuberculosis in South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(4):454–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dorman SE, Nahid P, Kurbatova EV, Phillips PP, Bryant K, Dooley KE, et al. Four-month rifapentine regimens with or without moxifloxacin for tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1705–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillespie SH, Crook AM, McHugh TD, Mendel CM, Meredith SK, Murray SR, et al. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(17):1577–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jindani A, Harrison TS, Nunn AJ, Phillips PP, Churchyard GJ, Charalambous S, et al. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merle CS, Fielding K, Sow OB, Gninafon M, Lo MB, Mthiyane T, et al. A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(17):1588–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steingart K, Jotblad S, Robsky K, Deck D, Hopewell P, Huang D, et al. Higher-dose rifampin for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(3):305–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boeree MJ, Diacon AH, Dawson R, Narunsky K, Du Bois J, Venter A, et al. A dose-ranging trial to optimize the dose of rifampin in the treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(9):1058–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Svensson EM, Svensson RJ, Te Brake LH, Boeree MJ, Heinrich N, Konsten S, et al. The potential for treatment shortening with higher rifampicin doses: relating drug exposure to treatment response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(1):34–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Ingen J, Aarnoutse RE, Donald PR, Diacon AH, Dawson R, van Plemper Balen G, et al. Why do we use 600 mg of rifampicin in tuberculosis treatment? Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):e194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boeree MJ, Heinrich N, Aarnoutse R, Diacon AH, Dawson R, Rehal S, et al. High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Velásquez GE, Brooks MB, Coit JM, Pertinez H, Vargas Vásquez D, Sanchez Garavito E, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampin in pulmonary tuberculosis A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(5):657–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seijger C, Hoefsloot W, Bergsma-de Guchteneire I, Te Brake L, van Ingen J, Kuipers S, et al. High-dose rifampicin in tuberculosis: Experiences from a Dutch tuberculosis centre. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3): e0213718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Korean Guidelines for Tuberculosis, 4th edition. 2020.

  18. World Health Organization. Definitions and reporting framework for tuberculosis–2013 revision: updated December 2014 and January 2020.

  19. International Council For Harmonization Of Technical Requirement For Pharmaceuticals For Human Use (ICH). ICH harmonised guideline. Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). 2016.

  20. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 2010.

  21. Kim J, Kwak N, Lee HY, Kim TS, Kim C-K, Han SK, et al. Effect of drug resistance on negative conversion of sputum culture in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;42:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee J-K, Lee JY, Kim DK, Yoon HI, Jeong I, Heo EY, et al. Substitution of ethambutol with linezolid during the intensive phase of treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):46–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu S, Sohn H, Kim H-Y, Kim H, Oh K-H, Kim H-J, et al. Evaluating the impact of the nationwide public–private mix (PPM) program for tuberculosis under National Health Insurance in South Korea: a difference in differences analysis. PLoS Med. 2021;18(7): e1003717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gumbo T, Louie A, Deziel MR, Liu W, Parsons LM, Salfinger M, et al. Concentration-dependent Mycobacterium tuberculosis killing and prevention of resistance by rifampin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(11):3781–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Y, Liu A, Ortega-Muro F, Alameda-Martin L, Mitchison D, Coates A. High-dose rifampicin kills persisters, shortens treatment duration, and reduces relapse rate in vitro and in vivo. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:641.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jayaram R, Gaonkar S, Kaur P, Suresh B, Mahesh B, Jayashree R, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of rifampin in an aerosol infection model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(7):2118–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Svensson RJ, Svensson EM, Aarnoutse RE, Diacon AH, Dawson R, Gillespie SH, et al. Greater early bactericidal activity at higher rifampicin doses revealed by modeling and clinical trial simulations. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(6):991–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shepardson D, MacKenzie WR. Update on cost-effectiveness of a 12-dose regimen for latent tuberculous infection at new rifapentine prices. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(6):751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Korea National Institute of Health (2020-ER5201-01), Republic of Korea. High-dose rifampicin tablets and capsules were donated from Yuhan (Seoul, Republic of Korea) for this study. The funder and donor had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Nakwon Kwak & Jae-Joon Yim

  2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea

    Doosoo Jeon

  3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Youngmok Park & Young Ae Kang

  4. Department of R&D, Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Cheongju, South Korea

    Kyung Jong Kim

  5. Clinical Research Section, International Tuberculosis Research Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Young Ran Kim

  6. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea

    Byoung Soo Kwon, Hyung-Jun Kim & Jae Ho Lee

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea

    Yong-Soo Kwon

  8. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Ji Yeon Lee

  9. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Jung-Kyu Lee

  10. Division of Pulmonology, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea

    Jeongha Mok

  11. Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Minkyoung Cheon, Jiwon Park & Seokyung Hahn

  12. Department of Human Systems Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Seokyung Hahn

Authors
  1. Nakwon Kwak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doosoo Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youngmok Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Young Ae Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kyung Jong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Young Ran Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Byoung Soo Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yong-Soo Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hyung-Jun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jae Ho Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ji Yeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jung-Kyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jeongha Mok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Minkyoung Cheon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jiwon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Seokyung Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jae-Joon Yim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors meet all four criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JJY conceived the study and participated in its design. NK and JJY drafted the manuscript. SH was in charge of statistical considerations in the study design. JP, MC, and SH constructed a database for this study. All authors contributed to the study design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Joon Yim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of all participating sites: Seoul National University Hospital (approval number: H-2005–191-1128), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (approval number: B-2008/628–404), Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (approval number: 20–2020-101). National Medical Center (approval number: NMC-2007–040), Pusan National University Hospital (approval number: H-2008–005-107), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (approval number: 05–2020-172), Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine (approval number: 4–2020-0755), and the Chonnam National University Hospital (approval number: CNUH-2020–243). Participants must provide signed and dated written informed consent prior to undergoing any study-specific procedures.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

SPIRIT checklist

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwak, N., Jeon, D., Park, Y. et al. Treatment shortening of drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis using high-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion (Hi-DoRi-3): a study protocol for an open-label randomized clinical trial. Trials 23, 666 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06631-z

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215