Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy and safety of artesunate for patients with IgA nephropathy: a study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Trials volume 23, Article number: 444 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease and is a common cause of progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with kidney diseases. Proteinuria levels are critical for the prognosis of patients with IgA nephropathy, but many patients are still unable to effectively control their proteinuria levels after receiving RAAS blockers. Antimalarial drugs have shown good efficacy in the treatment of kidney disease in previous studies; however, there have been no strictly designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the clinical efficacy of artesunate for treating IgA nephropathy patients. Therefore, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effect of artesunate versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy.

Methods

This study is a randomized, double-blind, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. One hundred and twenty eligible IgA nephropathy patients at risk of progression will be randomly divided into the artesunate 100-mg group, artesunate 50-mg group, and placebo group. Changes in proteinuria and renal function will be measured 6 months after the intervention. The levels of Gd-IgA1 and anti-Gd-IgA1 in the patient’s blood will also be tested to explore the possible immune mechanisms.

Discussion

Clinical evidence supporting artesunate treatment of IgA nephropathy is currently lacking, and we expect that the results of this trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for artesunate as a treatment option for IgA nephropathy in the future.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000038104. Registered on 10 September 2020

Peer Review reports

Background

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, characterized by prominent mesangial IgA deposition that is obfuscated on an immunofluorescence microscope, is the most common glomerular disease in the world [1]. The natural history of IgA nephropathy is highly heterogeneous; although the clinical data have shown that 50% of IgA nephropathy patients experience a sustained clinical remission, up to 40% of patients still develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within 20 years, and up to 40% experience a persistent decline in renal function [2,3,4]. The pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy is related to a “multi-hit” autoimmune process [5], which involves increased production of atypical galactose-deficient mucosal-type IgA1 antibodies, with the formation of anti-IgA1 autoantibodies, deposition of IgA1-containing immune complexes within the glomerular mesangium, and incitement of a nephritogenic inflammatory response by these immune complexes. Based on these underlying mechanisms, immunosuppressive drugs, including corticosteroids, are a potentially effective treatment option. However, the latest KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline recommends that only patients who remain at high risk of progressive CKD (defined as proteinuria >0.75–1 g/day despite 90 days of optimized supportive care) should be considered for a 6-month course of glucocorticoid therapy, and the important risk of treatment-emergent toxicity must be discussed with patients (2B, moderate-quality evidence) [6]. This recommendation takes into account the current uncertainty over the safety and efficacy of existing immunosuppressive treatment choices [7] and the risk of serious adverse events (deaths related to infectious complications in the use of glucocorticoids [8], so for the patients who remain at high risk of progression in IgAN and eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the opportunity to take part in a clinical trial to search for safer and more effective alternatives to corticosteroids should be offered. Although the latest rituximab, eculizumab, and targeted-release budesonide may be potential treatments for IgA nephropathy, they are still far from being introduced into routine clinical practice because of their high cost and unclear risks of adverse events [9,10,11]. In the absence of more effective and available control therapies for IgA nephropathy with a high risk of progression, easier and safer supportive therapies are warranted.

Antimalarial drugs may provide a new treatment approach for the management of IgA nephropathy. In a recent randomized controlled study, IgA nephropathy patients with RAAS blockers received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for 6 months and had a nearly 50% reduction in proteinuria, which was significantly different from patients who received RAAS blockers without HCQ (a 10% increase) [12]. HCQ has also been reported to reduce the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLE-DAI) and mortality in lupus nephritis and is currently the standard treatment for lupus nephritis [13]. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of HCQ seem to interfere with lysosomal activity, inhibit antigen presentation and Toll-like receptor signaling at different levels, and thus affect T cell- and B cell-related immune inflammation, thereby reducing kidney injury and reducing proteinuria levels [14,15,16]. Importantly, these studies also identified fewer side effects with HCQ than with corticosteroids, which gives us more confidence that antimalarial drugs may be an effective management measure for IgA nephropathy.

Artesunate (ART) is a derivative of artemisinin (ARS), a component extracted from the traditional Chinese herb Artemisia annua L., with improved pharmacological properties. ART has similar immunomodulatory effects to other antimalarial drugs [17], such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ), but has different active ingredients, which leads to the lack of risk of visual loss caused by HCQ [18]. Many experimental pieces of evidence have shown that ARS and its derivatives (ARSs) have good anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory functions in SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and other immune diseases [19]. ARS has been shown to improve podocyte injury, improve podoid fusion, and upregulate the expression of Nephrin and Podocin proteins in the podocytes of adriamycin nephropathy mice [20], and SM934 (an ARR) can reduce proteinuria, circulating antibodies, immune complex deposition in tissues, and podocyte injury and finally delay the progression of membranous nephropathy by inhibiting TGF-β1 expression and reducing the Smad2/3 expression pathway in Heymann nephritis mice [21]. More importantly, there is experimental evidence that ART combined with HCQ can effectively reduce 24-h urinary protein, IgA, and IgG immune complex deposition in the glomeruli of IgAN rats to reduce kidney damage through the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway [22]. Therefore, we hypothesized that ART might have the same excellent effects as HCQ in alleviating kidney injury and reducing proteinuria by inhibiting the activation and proliferation of B cells, inhibiting the generation of Gd-IgA1, and inhibiting inflammatory cytokines.

However, although a large amount of experimental evidence has been accumulated, there is still a lack of randomized controlled clinical trials to verify the potential effect of ART in the treatment of IgA nephropathy. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to estimate the efficacy and safety of ART in IgA nephropathy. We present this protocol, which was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT reporting checklist.

Methods and design

Study design

This study is designed as a double-blind, randomized, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled superiority trial. One hundred and twenty patients with IgA nephropathy will be recruited, and the overall study design will be divided into two phases. In the pre-randomization phase, all participants will be confirmed to have received at least 3 months of RAAS blocker therapy to ensure that the patients have reached optimal blood pressure control (130/80 mmHg, the ideal range specified by the KDIGO2012 clinical practice guidelines) or have received the maximum tolerated dose of ACE inhibitor or ARB before entering the next phase. After qualification confirmation and informed consent, the enrolled patients will enter the post-randomization intervention phase. All participants will be randomly divided into the ART 100-mg group, ART 50-mg group, and placebo group for 6 months of intervention.

The flow diagram of the study process is shown in Fig. 1. Each participant will be assigned eight visits, including 3 months before the randomization (visit 1), 2 months before the randomization (visit 2), 1 month before the randomization (visit 3), randomization (visit 4), 1 month after the intervention (visit 5), 2 months after the intervention (visit 6), 3 months after the intervention (visit 7), and 6 months after the intervention (visit 8). The schedule for enrollment, intervention, and assessment is shown in Table 1. Retention of patients is promoted by close and frequent contact with their nutritional counselor and study physician via telephone, email, and study visits. In case of relevant issues, visits outside the study schedule are offered.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow diagram of the study progress

Full size image
Table 1 Schedule of recruitment, interventions, and assessments
Full size table

The primary outcome measures will be determined by the percentage change in proteinuria in the three groups after 6 months of intervention. The secondary outcome measures will be the changes in urinary protein creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline after 1, 3, and 6 months of intervention, and the changes in serum galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and anti-Gd-IgA1 levels in patients will also be observed. We will stratify the risk of progression of the IgA patients and retrospectively evaluate the effect of ART on the proteinuria levels in IgA patients with different progression risks. Safety assessment of ART will be carried out throughout the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (Number: DZMEC-KY-2020-30) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (Number: ChiCTR2000038104).

This protocol has been reported according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 statement [23]. The SPIRIT checklist is listed in Supplement Table 1. A complete list of clinic hospitals where data will be collected is available in Supplement Table 2.

Participant recruitment

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for this study are (1) ages 18–75, (2) primary IgA nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy, (3) persistent proteinuria ≥1.0 g/day after receiving adequate RAAS blocker treatment (proteinuria ≥1.0 g/day at visit 1 and visit 3), and (4) eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria included patients who had to be treated with corticosteroid immunotherapy (minimal-change disease with IgA deposition and the presence of crescents in more than 50% of the glomeruli on a renal biopsy within 12 months); patients who must be treated with other immunosuppressants (such as calcineurin inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, or mycophenolate mofetil); patients receiving systemic immunosuppressive therapy in the past 6 months; patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg); secondary IgA nephropathy; acute kidney injury; malignant tumors; patients with serious diseases of other systems (such as liver damage, heart damage, diseases of the blood system, systemic infections, digestive ulcers); women who are planning to become or are pregnant; and patients with cognitive impairment who cannot sign the informed consent.

Withdrawal criteria

The subjects who no longer meet the inclusion criteria, have poor compliance, need immunosuppressive therapy, or have any other reason for violation of the protocol will be monitored by the investigators. These patients will be required to continue regular study visits as scheduled in the protocol after discontinuation of treatment. The data that need to be recorded is the end-point events and safety data that occurred during the duration of this trial.

Dropout criteria

Patients who refuse to participate in the study visits for personal reasons or those whom the researchers are unable to contact through all available means will be regarded as dropouts.

Termination criteria

Patients will be removed from the study if they develop severe liver or kidney damage during the trial (ALT or AST exceeding twice the normal upper limit, acute kidney injury), severe clinical discomfort caused by the drug (such as severe nausea and vomiting, severe dizziness, and headache), and severe drug allergies. All criteria and decisions will be jointly determined by two or more physicians with the title of deputy chief or higher.

Potential trial participants will be recruited from the six hospitals listed in Supplement Table 2. To reach the target sample size, the trial will be advertised in living communities by local healthcare professionals. We will also utilize advertising via brochures, flyers, or other means suggested through the clinic sites as appropriate. Before each interview, we described the aims of the study, guaranteed confidentiality, and obtained written informed consent. The interviews and examinations were achieved on the premises of the treatment hospital.

Randomization and allocation

Eligible patients will be randomly divided into the ART 100-mg group, ART 50-mg group, or placebo group at a ratio of 1:1:1. Random numbers will be generated and sorted by independent statisticians using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.), and then the patients will be divided into three groups based on the remainder of the number divided by 3. The randomized numbers, rank order, and grouping will be stored in opaque envelopes with serial numbers, which will be kept by the independent researchers and statisticians throughout the study. Envelopes and study drugs will be provided to enroll patients separately by independent blinded researchers.

Blinding

In this study, a double-blind approach will be applied to the patients and physicians. ART and placebo will be placed in packaged capsules with an identical appearance and distributed to the patients by independent researchers. At the end of the study, independent professional statisticians will be unblinded for the first time and will perform a preliminary analysis of the three sets of outcome data. A second unblinding will be applied to confirm the group and the effect. If serious adverse events occur during the study period, patients will be treated with emergency unblinding and relevant treatment according to the situation.

Interventions

The intervention will consist of ART 100-mg group oral 50 mg ART tablets twice a day, ART 50-mg group oral 25 mg ART tablets twice a day, and placebo group oral equivalent placebo twice a day. The ART tablets and placebo will be provided by Guilin Nanyao Co., Ltd. All patients will receive standard support treatment for IgA nephropathy, including adequate RAAS blockers and blood pressure control. Permissible combination antihypertensive medications include diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and β-receptor blockers. Hydrochlorothiazide or loop diuretics could be used when antihypertensive targets are difficult to achieve. Statins and aspirins are also allowed when necessary. Prohibited drugs include proprietary Chinese drugs that may reduce proteinuria (such as Tripterygium wilfordii, Penicillium notatum, Huangkui capsules, nephritis rehabilitation tablets, Haikun Shenxi capsules), corticosteroids, and any immunosuppressants (such as mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, HCQ).

Outcome measurements

The primary outcome is defined as the percentage change of proteinuria in all three groups after 6 months of intervention. Secondary outcomes include the changes in urinary protein creatinine ratio (UPCR), eGFR, and serum Gd-IgA1 levels in all three groups from baseline. The clinical characteristics of the patients will be collected at baseline before enrollment, including age, sex, age, course of the disease, combined disease, medication history, and so on. Throughout the follow-up, patients will be asked to provide urine and blood samples, which will be collected independently at visit 4 and visit 8, which will be collected for the following: collection, storage, and distribution of biological samples and related data for scientific research in the biobank of Dongzhimen hospital. In order to assess drug compliance, participants will be checked for the remaining number of drugs at each follow-up visit. Patient compliance will be calculated as the percentage of the actually taken number of tablets (distributed pills − returned pills) to the distributed number of drugs.

Safety assessment

The safety assessment includes any serious adverse event and any general adverse event according to the WHO acute and subacute side effects of the performance and indexing criteria for assessment [24]. All records, including adverse events and laboratory test results from the subjects, will be evaluated and followed up until resolved by a medically qualified investigator. The patient’s vital signs and any clinical discomfort will be monitored throughout the study period. Patients who are harmed during this study will receive the necessary medical treatments, such as changing the treatment plan, dealing with complications on time, etc., and the appropriate insurance will cover the expenses.

Steering committee

The steering committee consists of JW Zhou (chair), JC Lv, LJ Liu, H Li, YH Huo, YB Guo, and C Shen, which is responsible for the design, monitoring, reporting, and publication of the trial. The primary investigator is JW Zhou at Dongzhimen Hospital, sub-investigators are LJ Liu at Peking University First Hospital, H Li at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, YH Huo at the 7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, YB Guo at Dongfang Hospital, and C Shen at Beijing Chinese Medicine Hospital. The steering committee will have access to the final trial dataset.

Data collection and management

Each participant will receive a unique identifier upon study entry. This identifier will be used for all data documentation to ensure the participant’s confidentiality. The entire data collection and preliminary evaluation of the results will be performed by an independent third party. The data will be collected in the form of a case report form (CRF) and then reviewed and stored by the lead researcher in each center. Two researchers will independently convert the original data into electronic storage data to ensure the accuracy of the data. A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) comprised of independent members, including a statistician and a clinician, has been set up to improve the integrity and credibility of the results. All relevant documentation will be retained so that the safety and key efficacy outcomes can be retrospectively evaluated in the future. No specific interim analysis is foreseen for efficacy unless required by the Steering Committee or DSMB because of safety concerns.

Protocol amendments and publications

Important protocol modifications will be communicated to each of the authors and other relevant study investigators and will be updated on ClinicalTrials.gov. IRB approval will be obtained before any important protocol modifications will be implemented. Participants will be notified should any important protocol modifications would concern them. The results from the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal irrespective of the outcome. The final report will follow the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. Authorship of presentations and reports related to the study will be in the name of the collaborative group.

Sample size

This is a double-blind, randomized, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical study, and the sample size estimates were based on the change in proteinuria levels. According to the study results when using similar types of drugs (HCQ) for the treatment of IgA nephropathy [12, 25], the average baseline proteinuria was 2.0±0.8 g/day, and 36 participants in each arm could provide 90% of the detection ability, assuming that the placebo group level of proteinuria had not changed, and the ART treatment detected a 25% reduction in proteinuria (ART group: 0.5±0.5 g/day). Assuming that the two doses of the ART group has the same efficacy (the ratio of the ART group to the placebo group is 2:1), and a 10% dropout rate with a type I error rate of 0.05, we plan to enroll 120 participants (40 in each group) in the study.

Statistical analysis

All results will be analyzed based on an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Normally distributed data will be expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), while nonnormally distributed data will be expressed as the median of the interquartile interval (IQR). Categorical data will be summarized as counts and percentages. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be performed to determine the normal distribution of continuous variables. For the comparison of baseline characteristics between groups, continuous variables (standard normal distribution) will be analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, continuous variables (nonstandard normal distribution) and ordered categorical variables will be tested by the Kruskal-Wallis H test, and unordered categorical variables or count variables will be tested by the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test.

For the effectiveness outcomes, the primary outcome of proteinuria will be described by the percentage change of 24-h proteinuria test results at each visit from baseline, and the secondary outcomes of UPCR and eGFR will be described by the mean difference between the test results of each visit and the baseline. A paired-samples t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used for comparisons within groups at each visit time point from baseline, and one-factor ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis H test will be used for comparisons among groups at each visit time point.

For the safety indicators, adverse events will be described according to the number of cases and percentage, and the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test will be used to analyze the differences between groups. The missing values will be filled up by the last-observation-carried-forward method. For the initial analysis, we will not adjust for confounders or stratification, and for the secondary analysis, we will adjust for confounders for subgroup analyses, such as baseline proteinuria (3 g/day), renal function (eGFR 45 m1/min per 1.73 m2), blood pressure level (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg), MEST-C classification [26], and the new international risk-prediction score [27]. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.) will be used as the statistical analysis tool. A 2-sided P < 0.05 will be defined as statistically significant.

Discussion

Increasing attention has been given to the application of antimalarial drugs in kidney damage. Given that HCQ has been reported to have a good anti-proteinuria effect in IgA nephropathy patients and that ART has better pharmacological properties than HCQ [28], it is reasonable to believe that ART has the potential to treat IgA nephropathy. Therefore, we designed this double-blind, randomized, three-group-parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ART versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy characterized by a high risk of progression in the context of conventional adequate RAAS blocker therapy.

To date, there have been few clinical trials in China on ARSs for the treatment of renal diseases, and only two observational clinical studies on lupus nephritis have reported that ARSs can significantly reduce proteinuria and regulate immune function in patients with lupus nephritis [29, 30]. Studies on the treatment of IgA nephropathy with ART have been mainly based on animal models and cell experiments, and a large amount of laboratory evidence has shown that the effect of ART on IgA nephropathy may be primarily due to its strong anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory properties, as well as its ability to regulate oxidative stress [31]. Animal experiments found that the combination of ARS and HCQ can reduce the levels of 24-h urine protein, IgA, and IgG immune complex deposition in the glomerulus through NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling [22] and improve the barrier function of the glomerular filtration membrane by regulating the immune response in IgA nephropathy rats [32]. One team demonstrated that dihydroartemisinin (the main active metabolite of ART) could attenuate the proliferation of human mesangial cells induced by aggregated IgA1 through the mTOR signaling pathway in vitro [33]. Although there is a lot of current laboratory evidence that ART has a good regulatory effect on IgA nephropathy, there are still no high-quality randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials to provide evidence of ART in the treatment of IgA nephropathy, which has limited the clinical use of ART in IgA nephropathy.

IgA nephropathy is widely accepted to be a consequence of four hits: circulating IgA1 bearing galactose-deficient O-glycans (Gd-IgA1) in patients with IgA nephropathy is increased (hit 1), and these IgA1 glycobodies are recognized as autoantigens by antiglycan autoantibodies (anti-Gd-IgA1 autoantibodies; hit 2), which leads to the formation of an immune complex in nephritis (hit 3), some of which is deposited in the kidney and activates mesangial cells (hit 4), resulting in kidney injury [34]. The Gd-IgA1 molecule, which is a typical feature of IgAN, is produced by IgA1-secreting cells (normal functioning B cells) through abnormal biosynthesis of O-glycans [35]. When B cells are programmed to sialylate IgA1 in the early stage of posttranslational glycosylation (the addition of galactose is excluded), the formation of IgA1-containing immune complexes in IgAN can be changed [36]. The accumulated evidence shows that the possible mechanism of ART in treating IgA nephropathy includes two aspects: ARS can inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6 and TGF-β) and block the overactivation of B lymphocytes [37], inhibit the synthesis of Gd-IgA1, and reduce the production of IgG and/or IgA1 autoantibodies, reducing the severity of IgA nephropathy. ARS can also reduce the inflammatory cascade caused by mesangial cell activation by inhibiting the production of cytokines [38] (such as the NF-κB signal transduction pathway) and alleviate the subsequent damage to podocytes and tubules, thus reducing proteinuria.

Our study benefits from our larger sample size and the strict design as a multicenter, three-group-parallel study with placebo controls, and we will observe the effects of ART on the serum Gd-IgA levels in patients with IgA nephropathy, which will help us better understand the proteinuria reduction effect of ART and its possible mechanism. The limitation of this study is that it is a proof-of-concept study and will only follow the patients up for 6 months, which may not initially provide clear answers to more mechanistic questions. If this study achieves the expected results at the end of the trial, additional clinical studies with longer follow-up periods will be conducted to confirm whether ART could be an alternative treatment option for IgA nephropathy in the future.

Trial status

This is version 2.0, 23 April 2020. Recruitment will start on 1 July 2021, and we anticipate that the trial will finish recruitment on 31 December 2022.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and appropriate human subject approval.

Abbreviations

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

HCQ:

Hydroxychloroquine

ART:

Artesunate

ARS:

Artemisinin

CQ:

Chloroquine

SPIRIT:

The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

UPCR:

Urinary protein creatinine ratio

ITT:

Intention-to-treat

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile interval

References

  1. D’Amico G. The commonest glomerulonephritis in the world: IgA nephropathy. Q J Med. 1987;64(245):709–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manno C, Strippoli GF, D'Altri C, Torres D, Rossini M, Schena FP. A novel simpler histological classification for renal survival in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(6):763–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nolin L, Courteau M. Management of IgA nephropathy: evidence-based recommendations. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;70:S56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rekola S, Bergstrand A, Bucht H. Deterioration of GFR in IgA nephropathy as measured by 51Cr-EDTA clearance. Kidney Int. 1991;40(6):1050–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wyatt RJ, Julian BA. IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2402–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Glomerular Diseases Work G. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100(4S):S1–S276.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, et al. Intensive supportive care plus immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2225–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MG, Jardine MJ, Hladunewich M, Jha V, et al. Effect of oral methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2017;318(5):432–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fellström BC, Barratt J, Cook H, Coppo R, Feehally J, de Fijter JW, et al. Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10084):2117–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblad T, Rebetz J, Johansson M, Békássy Z, Sartz L, Karpman D. Eculizumab treatment for rescue of renal function in IgA nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(11):2225–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lafayette RA, Canetta PA, Rovin BH, Appel GB, Novak J, Nath KA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of rituximab in IgA nephropathy with proteinuria and renal dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(4):1306–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu LJ, Yang YZ, Shi SF, Bao YF, Yang C, Zhu SN, et al. Effects of hydroxychloroquine on proteinuria in IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(3):411–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacre K, Criswell LA, McCune JM. Hydroxychloroquine is associated with impaired interferon-alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(3):R155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SJ, Silverman E, Bargman JM. The role of antimalarial agents in the treatment of SLE and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7(12):718–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuznik A, Bencina M, Svajger U, Jeras M, Rozman B, Jerala R. Mechanism of endosomal TLR inhibition by antimalarial drugs and imidazoquinolines. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2011;186(8):4794–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma J-D, Jing J, Wang J-W, Yan T, Li Q-H, Mo Y-Q, et al. A novel function of artesunate on inhibiting migration and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Dunogué B, Morel N, Le Guern V, Guettrot-Imbert G. Hydroxychloroquine: a multifaceted treatment in lupus. Presse Med (Paris, France: 1983). 2014;43(6 Pt 2):e167–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Zuo J, Tang W. Water-soluble artemisinin derivatives as promising therapeutic immunosuppressants of autoimmune diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(11):887–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu X, An P, Ye B, Shi X, Dang H, Fu R, et al. Artemisinin ameliorated proteinuria in rats with adriamycin-induced nephropathy through regulating nephrin and podocin expressions. J Tradit Chin Med. 2014;34(1):63–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li TT, Zhang XH, Jing JF, Li X, Yang XQ, Zhu FH, et al. Artemisinin analogue SM934 ameliorates the proteinuria and renal fibrosis in rat experimental membranous nephropathy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36(2):188–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai L, Li J, Li H, Song J, Zhou Y, Lu R, et al. Renoprotective effects of artemisinin and hydroxychloroquine combination therapy on IgA nephropathy via suppressing NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation by exosomes in rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;169:113619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Seegenschmiedt MH. WHO — toxicity criteria: Nebenwirkungen in der Onkologie; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang YZ, Liu LJ, Shi SF, Wang JW, Chen YQ, Lv JC, et al. Effects of hydroxychloroquine on proteinuria in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2018;47(3):145–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Markowitz G. Updated Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: a new MEST-C score. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(7):385–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barbour SJ, Coppo R, Zhang H, Liu Z-H, Suzuki Y, Matsuzaki K, et al. Evaluating a new international risk-prediction tool in IgA nephropathy. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):942–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng H, Colvin CJ, Johnson BK, Kirchhoff PD, Wilson M, Jorgensen-Muga K, et al. Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosRST signaling and persistence. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(2):218–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lan L. Study on effect of Cordyceps sinensis and artemisinin in preventing recurrence of lupus nephritis. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2002;22(3):169–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huang XX. Clinical study on immune function regulation of artesunate in patients with lupus nephritis. Lishizhen Med Materia Med Res. 2011;22(07):1673–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xia M, Liu D, Liu Y, Liu H. The therapeutic effect of artemisinin and its derivatives in kidney disease. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin XQ, Yuan J, Song JP, Guan YZ, Fu L, Zhou JY, et al. Experimental study on artemisinin combined with hydroxychloroquine in treating rats with IgA nephropathy. Lishizhen Med Materia Med Res. 2016;27(05):608–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Xia M, Liu D, Tang X, Liu Y, Liu H, Liu Y, et al. Dihydroartemisinin inhibits the proliferation of IgAN mesangial cells through the mTOR signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;80:106125.

  34. Lai KN, Tang SC, Schena FP, Novak J, Tomino Y, Fogo AB, et al. IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suzuki H, Moldoveanu Z, Hall S, Brown R, Vu HL, Novak L, et al. IgA1-secreting cell lines from patients with IgA nephropathy produce aberrantly glycosylated IgA1. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):629–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith A, Molyneux K, Feehally J, Barratt J. Is sialylation of IgA the agent provocateur of IgA nephropathy? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(7):2176–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mu X, Wang C. Artemisinins—a promising new treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus: a descriptive review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018;20(9):55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu X, Zhang W, Shi X, An P, Sun W, Wang Z. Therapeutic effect of artemisinin on lupus nephritis mice and its mechanisms. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2010;42(12):916–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the research staff at all of the participating clinical sites, all of the participating providers, the organizational leaders, and the funding from Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Project of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (2020-JYB-ZDGG-118). The Guilin Nanyao Co., Ltd is paying for the costs of drugs and placebo in this trial. The study funder sponsor did not play a role in the trial design, the writing of the protocol report, and the decision to submit the protocol for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qi Chen and Zi Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Dongzhimen Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100007, China

    Qi Chen, Weiwei Sun, Shichao Li, Zhenjie Chen & Jingwei Zhou

  2. Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University and Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, 100034, China

    Zi Wang, Jicheng Lv & Lijun Liu

  3. Department of Nephrology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100005, China

    Hang Li

  4. Department of Nephrology, the 7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, China

    Yanhong Huo

  5. Department of Nephrology, Dongfang Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100078, China

    Yingbo Guo

  6. Department of Nephrology, Beijing Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100010, China

    Cun Shen

Authors
  1. Qi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jicheng Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lijun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weiwei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yanhong Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yingbo Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Cun Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shichao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhenjie Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jingwei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

(I) Conception and design: Z. Chen, J. Zhou, and J. Lv; (II) administrative support: W. Sun and S. Li; (III) provision of study materials or patients: L. Liu, H. LI, Y. Hou, Y. Guo, and C. Shen; (IV) collection and assembly of data: Q. Chen and Z. Wang; (V) data analysis and interpretation: W. Sun and S. Li; (VI) manuscript writing: all authors; (VII) final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenjie Chen or Jingwei Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (Number: DZMEC-KY-2020-30).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

: SPIRIT 2013 checklist.

Additional file 2.

: A complete list of clinic hospitals where data will be collected.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Wang, Z., Lv, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of artesunate for patients with IgA nephropathy: a study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Trials 23, 444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06336-3

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215