Skip to main content

Comparison of BARD®LIFESTREAM™ covered balloon-expandable stent versus GORE® VIABAHN™ covered self-expandable stent in treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial (NEONATAL trial)

Abstract

Background

Covered stent has become one of the mainstream therapies for aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD), with a higher patency rate than bare metal stent. Covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stent can be placed more accurately with higher a radial support force, while covered self-expanding (CSE) stent has greater elasticity and higher trackability. However, there is no level I evidence regarding the comparison safety and efficacy between the CSE stent and CBE stent in AIOD to date. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™) and CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™) in AIOD.

Methods

This trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled and these patients will be randomized to either the CBE stent group or the CSE stent group. The primary end point of the study is the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after the intervention.

Discussion

To our knowledge, the ballooN sElf cOver steNt AorToiliAc occuLusive (NEONATAL) trial is the first RCT to compare CBE and CSE stent in AIOD patients. The main aim is to compare the TLR of the target lesion between CBE stent and CSE stent at 12 months post-procedure. The results of clinical trials may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing the optimal type of covered stent in the treatment of AIOD patients.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2100046734. Registered on 27 May 2021

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD) is a common chronic atherosclerotic arterial occlusive disease involving infrarenal aorta or iliac arteries that accounts for approximately one-third of all peripheral artery disease cases and places a high economic burden on treatment [1]. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) recommends the endovascular approach as the preferred treatment for TASCII A and B aortoiliac lesions instead of open surgery [2]. A related systematic review showed that endovascular treatment was considered valid as open surgical revascularization due to shorter hospitalization and a similar long-term patency rate in TASCII C and D lesions [3, 4]. Furthermore, the recent guideline from the European Society of Vascular Surgery suggested that an endovascular-first strategy may be considered for aorto-iliac occlusive lesions if performed by an experienced team [5]. Regarding device selection in aortoiliac artery interventions, covered stents have a higher class of recommendation in moderate to severe calcified and diffuse lesions than bare metal stents with superior patency rate [6,7,8].

Covered stents are classified as self-expandable or balloon-expandable, according to the mechanics of stent deployment. Technically, self-expandable stents have greater elasticity, allowing them to maintain their shape after post-dilation and continue to expand as the vessel remodels until they reach the appropriate size. In addition, self-expandable stents are more flexible and trackable; thus, they more easily pass through tortuous vessels. By comparison, balloon-expandable stents have much greater radial support strength, which is especially vital in diffuse, heavily calcified lesions. In addition, balloon-expandable stents can be deployed more precisely with minimal geographic displacement; hence, they are adopted widely in lesions involving aortic bifurcations.

Current evidence has shown that the 1-year restenosis rate and target lesion revascularization rate of self-expandable bare stents are higher than those of balloon-expandable bare stents in AIOD patients [9]. However, the efficacy and safety of covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stents versus covered self-expanding (CSE) stents in the treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease remain unknown.

Current evidence regarding CBE and CSE stents in AIOD mainly focuses on comparisons with bare metal stents (BMSs). Several studies suggested that patients who received CBE stents had an enduring patency advantage, a lower rate of revascularization, and a similar limb amputation rate compared with those who received BMS [6, 8]. Additionally, another study showed that CBE stents were superior to bare metal balloon-expandable stents for the treatment of common iliac artery (CIA) disease at 3 years regarding primary patency, assisted patency, and secondary patency [10]. However, another study demonstrated that the use of CSE stents has similar early and midterm outcomes compared with BMS in severe iliac lesions, while CSE seemed to have higher midterm patency than BMS only in TASC D subjects [11]. As there is no direct comparison between CSE and CBE stent in AIOD patients, no definitive conclusion can be drawn regarding which type of stent is superior.

The Gore Viabahn endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) and LifeStream covered iliac stent (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Tempe, Ariz) represent one of the most widely used CSE and CBE stents, respectively. This prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the safety and efficacy of CSE stents and CBE stents in AIOD patients, with a special focus on midterm and long-term freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Methods/design

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (approval number: 2021-212) on 11 March 2021. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100046734) on 27 May 2021.

Protocol amendments

In our trial, simple size may be adjusted based on TLR at 12 months post-procedures, which will be notified to the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, monitoring committee, and the upstream authorities. Other non-substantial amendments will not be notified to the monitoring committee and the upstream authorities, but will be recorded by researcher. Update informed consent forms will be sent to new patients after amendments, and all researches will be informed correspondently.

Data access

Project principal investigators, ethics committee, and monitoring committee will have access to the final trial dataset and all data information will be de-identified. Furthermore, independent institution will be contacted for monitoring and quality assurance during the conduct of the study.

Post-trial care

There is no underlying harm for trial participant when LIFESTREAM or VIABAHN stent placed. After the procedure, patients will be provided with guidance on specialized treatment protocols and dressing changes.

Study setting

The NEONATAL trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (allocation ratio 1:1), planned to be conducted in West China Hospital, Chengdu, China. The present protocol was written according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement for study protocols of clinical trials [12]. Patient-centered care was involved in the design of our protocol. We conducted a preliminary survey in patients to investigate the outcomes they care most and the follow-up methods that they prefer. The SPIRIT flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1, and the SPIRIT Checklist is added in Additional file 1. Table 1 shows the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The procedure of screening, randomization, and follow-up of patients in the trial

Table 1 The schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments

Eligibility criteria

Patients at least 18 years old who are diagnosed with AIOD (Rutherford classification from 2 to 6) will be screened for study recruitment. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria

Allocation and implementation of interventions

Prior to the endovascular intervention, patients will be enrolled, and informed consent will be obtained from all participants by surgeons. The included patients were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the CBE stenting group or the CSE stenting group using Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4) by a biostatistician within sex and 5-year age groups in blocks of ten, and stratification was performed by numbers of treatable legs. For patients who required intervention in bilateral iliac arteries, randomization was performed according to the treated arteries. The sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes were used to keep the allocation code for each participant, which will be kept unopened by an independent research assistant. The nurse research coordinator in the operating room will prepare the envelopes and inform the surgeon of the allocation results before intervention. Both nurse research coordinators and biostatisticians were not involved in the perioperative management of patients. The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the interventions.

Details of intervention

The included patients will receive the same perioperative management, including antiplatelet drugs, statin usage, and blood controls. Both common femoral arteries and sometimes brachial artery will be used for access. Whether to adopt percutaneous or cutdown access route will be determined by the surgeons. After obtaining arterial access, 0.5 mg/kg of unfractionated heparin will be administered. A fluor opaque ruler will be used to record the location and extent of the lesion. Both intraluminal and subintimal recanalization of iliac lesions will be allowed. After the successful passage of the guidewire, the target lesion will be predilated with downsized balloon in CBE group, and with equal-sized balloon in CSE group. During actual intervention, the allocated choice of covered stents may be modified according to intraoperative findings, for instance, the length of lesions did not match the stents. Multiple stents are required when needed and multiple stent edges should overlap by at least 10 mm. Furthermore, additional bare metal stents can be added in both groups, according the discretion of surgeons. Post-dilation balloon will be performed within the stented segment, with less than 10% oversizing. Final angiography will be performed after the intervention in both groups, with the same angles and magnifications as the baseline angiography.

Postoperative management include a dual antiplatelet regimen for 3 months, involving 100 mg of aspirin once a day plus 75 mg of clopidogrel once a day. Clopidogrel is not required if a participant is taking warfarin; other direct thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors, or low molecular weight heparin will be used according to the physician’s recommendation. Anticoagulant therapy will be discontinued when other surgical procedures are needed, and then, the participant will resume anticoagulant therapy as soon as possible after the surgery. Drug side effects will be checked and monitored at outpatient visit or telephone follow-up. According to the comprehensive surgeon’s recommendation, drug therapy will be discontinued. Clinical follow-up will be planned at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months to evaluate clinical outcomes.

CBE and CSE stent

The CBE stent used in our trial is BARD® LIFESTREAM™ Covered Stent, a permanent stent used to maintain patency of the common or external iliac artery. The stent is a balloon-expandable stent with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) encapsulated between two layers (inner and outer). The implant is pre-mounted on an over-the-wire balloon catheter that acts as the delivery system. The configurations of BARD® LIFESTREAM™ covered stent offered 16, 26, 37, 38, and 58 mm in length and 5 to 12 mm in diameter. The stents can be overlapped if the target lesion exceeds the longest available length of stent.

GORE® VIABAHN™ self-expandable covered stent is the only CSE stent adopted in our trial; it consists of two main components: an intravascular covered stent and a catheter-based delivery system. The stent consists of a self-expanding nickel-titanium alloy stent combined with an ePTFE intracavity coating, which is offered in lengths of 25, 50, and 100 mm and in diameters of 5 to 11 and 12 mm in the configurations.

Follow-up and outcomes of interest

Primary outcome and secondary outcomes are set based on patient-centered outcomes. All included patients will be followed up in outpatient clinics using questionnaires at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after the initial intervention. Patients who are unable to return will be followed up on telephone. Duplex ultrasound will be tested routinely at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-index procedure; CTA will be routinely tested at 12 and 36 months post-index procedure; and if duplex US suggests restenosis at the target lesion, a further CTA examination will be performed to assess the stenosis. If the restenosis is more than 50% and the patient’s symptoms are worse (e.g., shorter claudication distance or exacerbation of pain), reintervention will be carried out. Patients who are unable to return to clinic will be suggested to undergo computed tomography angiography (CTA) or duplex ultrasonography in local hospital. Images and medical records will be sent to investigators online. Trained outcomes assessor will collect the outcomes of interest, blinded to the intervention groups.

The timepoint for the primary outcome of this study is 12 months. Patients are defined as dropout if they meet the following criteria: (1) lost to follow-up for less than 12 months post-intervention: a subject is considered loss to follow-up if cannot be contacted via fifth attempts by telephone and WeChat message. (2) Withdrawal consent to participation of the study: all participants have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason.

Primary outcome

Target lesion revascularization (TLR) of the target lesion(s) assessed at 12 months after the intervention (TLR is defined as the first revascularization procedure (e.g., percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), atherectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis)) when the primary patency is lost.

Secondary outcomes

The following secondary endpoints of this study are collected at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-index procedure:

(1) Stent and/or surgery related mortality; (2) all-cause mortality; (3) amputation-free survival; (4) acute limb ischemia rate; (5) major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs); (6) target vessel revascularization (TVR) (TVR is defined as the first revascularization procedure (e.g. PTA, stenting, surgical bypass, etc.) in the target vessel(s)); (7) primary patency (the loss of primary patency is defined as target lesion(s) is determined to be > 50% stenosis or TLR/TLR needed in follow up); (8) primary assisted patency (the loss of primary assisted patency is defined as target lesion(s) is determined to be > 50% stenosis after TLR); (9) secondary patency (the loss of secondary patency is defined as target lesion(s) is determined to be > 50% stenosis after endovascular procedure or surgical bypass TVR); and (10) stent-related complication (e.g., stent kinking or fracture).

Data collection and management

Two investigators will use a pre-identified and unified case report form (CRF) to record the data of included patients independently. Both received training for data collection. Demographics, comorbidities, and prescriptions of cardiovascular drugs were recorded from patient chart. Imaging anatomic parameters were measured from picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Laboratory results were collected from laboratory information system (LIS).

As for data management, two investigators retrieved data from CRF and recorded them in two identical electronic forms, and cross check will be performed to ascertain the accuracy of data. We also set range checks for data values. Importantly, the investigators will be urged to follow up on patients by telephone contacts. Data will be collected in as much detail as possible. Collected data lists will be de-identified and stored in monitoring committee and will be made available to the third-party regulatory body upon request.

Sample size calculation

We calculated the sample size for this study based on the results of previous studies [4, 13]. As is reported previously in AIOD patients, the 9-month primary patency of CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™ Stent) was 89.1%, while the 9-month primary patency of the CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™ stent) was estimated to be 82.2% based on VIASTAR Trial [14, 15]. In the present study, we hypothesized that the primary patency of CBE stent is not inferior to that of CSE stent; the predetermined noninferiority margin on risk difference scale (δ) is set as 10% between treatment groups. The type I error rate is 0.05, the power of the test is set as 80%, and the randomization ratio is set as 1:1. After accounting for a 15% dropout rate. It was calculated that 53 lesions per group are needed for a total of 106 lesions.

In order to achieve adequate participant enrollment, we will recruit patients by putting up posters or advertising on the Internet, furthermore, we actively recruit patients from outpatient department and emergency department.

Statistical analysis

R studio Version 1.2.1335 (http://www.R-project.org) and Empower (www.empowerstats.com, X&Y solutions, Inc., Boston, MA) were utilized for statistical analysis. Categorical data are expressed as numbers and rates, while continuous data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) if they are normally distributed, or median (interquartile range [IQR]) vice versa. Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test is used for univariate analysis of continuous data, and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test is used for categorical data. For primary analyses, multivariate logistic regression is adopted to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for short-term outcomes. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis is used to generate adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% CI for long-term outcomes. The primary and secondary end points will be analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, which includes all subjects undergo randomization and subsequent interventions. Sensitivity analyses of primary and secondary endpoints are performed in the per-protocol population, based on the treatment actually received. The noninferiority margin was set at 10 percentage points for the absolute difference between groups. If the standard of noninferiority was reached, the primary and secondary outcomes were subsequently tested for superiority (P<0.05). Noninferiority will be considered proven if conclusions drawn from the intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses are consistent.

Further pre-specified subgroup analyses will be carried out in the following subgroups: TASC II C-D lesions versus A-B lesions, occlusion versus stenosis. Adjustment analyses for primary and secondary endpoints were performed based on the Hochberg method [16]. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data.

Monitoring

The monitoring committee consists of biostatisticians, surgeons, investigators, and nurses who are not involved in the conduct of this study or have financial and professional interests. Annual monitoring will be conducted by the monitoring committee. The monitoring committee will provide feedback to investigators and vascular surgeons as soon as there are any problems. Ethics committee and monitoring committee will have access to check the collected data and question the rationality of the study protocol before, during, and after the trial. Classical interim analyses will be performed by an independent statistician who will be a person other than the regular study statistician. The trial will be terminated when one treatment group is significantly superior or inferior to the other treatment group. The final decisions regarding study modifications or stop rest with both ethics committee and monitoring committee. All serious adverse events (SAEs) must be reported as soon as possible. The SAE form contains the following information: identification of the subject, attending surgeon, and description of the SAE (event, beginning and duration, severity, outcome, treatment, or interventions taken). To maintain the quality and safety of trial, unblinding occurs only in exceptional circumstances when knowledge of the actual treatment is essential for further management of the subject.

Auditing

The researcher and trained auditors meet monthly to ensure that study is being conducted according to protocol. Annual auditing reports will be presented in annual monitoring by auditors.

Discussion

The past three decades have witnessed open surgery shift to endovascular strategies as the preferred treatment for mild-to-moderate-to-severe AIOD. Endovascular therapy is increasingly preferred as the first-line treatment in most AIOD patients. Different stents have different designs (covered stents, bare metal stents, self-expanding stents and balloon-expandable stents) but which type is the best for AIOD patients has yet to be fully elucidated [17].

Previous studies have shown that covered stents can create a smooth hemodynamically favorable lumen and resist hyperplastic ingrowth through BMS interstices; in addition, covered stents can also protect against iliac artery rupture post-dilation [8, 10, 18]. Self-expandable stents have high elasticity and small radial force, which helped to prevent circumferential stress and subsequently enhanced neointimal proliferation. This may be the reason why self-expandable bare metal stents led to a decreased incidence of restenosis at 12 months compared with treatment with balloon-expandable bare metal stents [9]. However, the best choice between CBE stent and CSE stent is left to the interventionalist’s preference and lack of RCT data now, leading to there is no consensus or relevant guidelines on which stents should be used in AIOD.

The Viabahn stent and LifeStream stent represent one of the most widely used CSE and CBE stents, respectively. A previous study showed that Viabahn covered stent can be considered an acceptable patency with low complications during the long-term period in low-risk young AIOD patients [4], especially for complex aortoiliac occlusion lesions [19]. Another study indicated that the LifeStream stent provided satisfactory 9-month clinical outcomes, including a low rate of TLR for the treatment of stenotic and occlusive lesions of the iliac arteries [15]. However, there is no long-term period patency or TLR of the LifeStream stent. Furthermore, there is no cohort or RCT study to compare the efficacy or effect between Viabahn stent and LifeStream stent. The main aim of our present trial is to compare TLR of the target lesion of LifeStream stent with Viabahn at 12 months’ follow-up.

In conclusion, this trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™) versus a CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™) in AIOD patients, hoping to provide level 1 evidence for stent selection in aortoiliac occlusive lesions.

Trial status

Ethics approval has been granted before submission. The trial is currently in the recruitment phase. Study enrollment began on 1 June 2020. It is estimated that recruitment will be completed by 1 June 2022, with a study completion date of 1 June 2024. Any protocol amendments will be updated in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry.

References

  1. Mahoney EM, Wang K, Keo HH, Duval S, Smolderen KG, Cohen DJ, et al. Vascular hospitalization rates and costs in patients with peripheral artery disease in the United States. 2010;3(6):642–51.

  2. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(Suppl S):S5-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ye W, Liu CW, Ricco JB, Mani K, Zeng R, J. Jiang Early and late outcomes of percutaneous treatment of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class C and D aorto-iliac lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(6):1728–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antonello M, Squizzato F, Bassini S, Porcellato L, Grego F, M. Piazza Open repair versus endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac lesions in low risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(4):1155–1165 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Halliday, and J.J. Bax The 2017 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018;55(3):301–302.

  6. Sabri SS, Choudhri A, Orgera G, Arslan B, Turba UC, Harthun NL, et al. Outcomes of covered kissing stent placement compared with bare metal stent placement in the treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the aortic bifurcation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):995–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman DN, Armstrong EJ, Aronow HD, Banerjee S, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Jaff MR, et al. SCAI guidelines on device selection in Aorto-Iliac arterial interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(4):915–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mwipatayi BP, Sharma S, Daneshmand A, Thomas SD, Vijayan V, Altaf N, et al. Durability of the balloon-expandable covered versus bare-metal stents in the Covered versus Balloon Expandable Stent Trial (COBEST) for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(1):83–94 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krankenberg H, Zeller T, Ingwersen M, Schmalstieg J, Gissler HM, Nikol S, et al. Self-expanding versus balloon-expandable stents for iliac artery occlusive disease: the randomized ICE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(16):1694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Humphries MD, Armstrong E, Laird J, Paz J, W. Pevec Outcomes of covered versus bare-metal balloon-expandable stents for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piazza M, Squizzato F, Dall'Antonia A, Lepidi S, Menegolo M, Grego F, et al. Editor’s choice - outcomes of self expanding PTFE covered stent versus bare metal stent for chronic iliac artery occlusion in matched cohorts using propensity score modelling. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 201754(2):177–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e758e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johannes Lammer MDD, Bleyn J, Katzen BT, Cejna M, Piquet P, Becker GJ, et al. Peripheral arterial obstruction: prospective study of treatment with a transluminally placed self-expanding stent-graft. International Trial Study Group. Radiology. 2000;217(1):95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lammer J, Zeller T, Hausegger KA, Schaefer PJ, Gschwendtner M, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, et al. Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1320–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laird JR, Zeller T, Holden A, Scheinert D, Moore E, Mendes R, et al. Balloon-expandable vascular covered stent in the treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease: 9-month results from the BOLSTER multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(6):836–844 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. 1995;57(1):289–300.

  17. Piazza M, Squizzato F, Spolverato G, Milan L, Bonvini S, Menegolo M, et al. Outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent versus bare-metal stent in the primary treatment of severe iliac artery obstructive lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(5):1210–8 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mwipatayi BP, Ouriel K, Anwari T, Wong J, Ducasse E, Panneton JM, et al. A systematic review of covered balloon-expandable stents for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(4):1473–1486 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Psacharopulo D, Ferrero E, Ferri M, Viazzo A, Singh Bahia S, Trucco A, et al. Increasing efficacy of endovascular recanalization with covered stent graft for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D aortoiliac complex occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(5):1219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Confidentiality

All members signed a confidentiality agreement with the investigator. In addition, members will treat the reports, meeting discussions, and minutes as confidential. Participants’ identity information is encrypted to prevent leakage during the whole study. The investigator is required to maintain adequate records to enable the conduct of the study to be fully documented. Documents used for the conduct of the study (e.g., patient files and originals of test results) must be kept by the investigator for a period of 15 years.

Funding

This trial was conducted with no external funding, internal funding, grants, nor individual funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YD: conception and design, critical revision, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable, statistical analysis, obtaining funding. WTH: conception and design, critical revision, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable, statistical analysis, obtaining funding. QYH: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable, statistical analysis. WJR: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable, statistical analysis. ZJC: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. HB: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. XF: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. DXJ: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. CXY: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. GQ: conception and design, writing the manuscript, approval of the manuscript, agreement to be accountable. The authors read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tiehao Wang or Ding Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University (approval number: 2021-212) on 3 March 2021. Informed consent will be obtained from each participant or from each of the participants’ legally responsible relatives.

Consent for publication

Upon trial completion, the main manuscript with results, whether positive, negative, or neutral, will be submitted to a major clinical journal for peer review and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Checklist: recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol

Additional file 2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, J. et al. Comparison of BARD®LIFESTREAM™ covered balloon-expandable stent versus GORE® VIABAHN™ covered self-expandable stent in treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial (NEONATAL trial). Trials 23, 392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06332-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06332-7

Keywords

  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Covered balloon-expandable stent
  • Covered self-expanding stent
  • Aortoiliac obstructive disease