Skip to main content

The efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children (KIDNET) as a treatment for traumatized young refugees versus treatment as usual: update to the study protocol for the multi-center randomized controlled trial YOURTREAT

A Study protocol to this article was published on 14 February 2020

Abstract

Background

The trial YOURTREAT aims to compare the pragmatic, short-term psychotherapy Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children (KIDNET) with treatment as usual (TAU) for the treatment of young refugees in Germany. This update outlines changes made to the study protocol in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic with the aim of allowing the continuation of the clinical trial while ensuring the safety of the staff and the participants, maintaining methodological quality, and ensuring compliance with legal regulations.

Methods

The major amendments to the original study protocol include (1) the possibility of using telehealth technology for the conduction of diagnostic and therapy sessions, (2) a reduction of the diagnostic set, and (3) an increased flexibility in the time frame of the study protocol.

Discussion

The adaptations to the study protocol made it feasible to continue with the trial YOURTREAT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the diagnostic set had to be shortened, the primary outcomes and the main secondary outcomes remain unimpaired by the amendment. Therefore, we expect the trial to provide evidence regarding effective treatment options for young refugees in Germany, a population that has received little scientific attention so far and has only very limited access to mental health care in the German health care system. In light of the current pandemic, which globally increases the risk of mental problems, the situation for young refugees is likely to aggravate further. Thus, the clinical and social relevance of the present trial YOURTREAT is even more important in these particular times.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; DRKS) DRKS00017222. Registered on May 15, 2019

Peer Review reports

Background

This update refers to the study protocol of the multi-center clinical trial “The efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children (KIDNET) as a Treatment for Traumatized Young Refugees versus Treatment as Usual” (YOURTREAT) originally published in TRIALS [1] and should be read in conjunction with the original study protocol.

The current COVID-19 pandemic is an unpredicted and extraordinary situation, posing challenges to clinical trials and requiring adaptations of the study protocols for the yet uncertain duration of the pandemic in order to allow for a safe continuation of trial activities and avoid attrition of participants [2]. The following protocol amendment was thus implemented to the clinical trial YOURTREAT as a reaction to the current challenges with the aim of allowing the continuation of the clinical trial while ensuring the safety of the staff and the participants, maintaining methodological quality and ensuring compliance with legal regulations.

In March 2020, German authorities have issued far reaching measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic including restrictions such as curfew, contact ban, and a prohibition of clinical research. These measures required a temporary suspension of recruitment activities in all study centers from March to July 2020; however, the clinical activities with participants already enrolled in the study (ongoing diagnostic interviews and therapies) were continued for ethical reasons. Because the federal states are responsible for the anti-pandemic regulations in Germany, the specific local requirements vary between the study centers. During the early stage of the pandemic, regulations have been changing almost every 2 weeks and have remained unsteady to the present day. Therefore, the YOURTREAT trial protocol needed to be adapted to ensure the continuation of the trial in these unstable conditions.

(1) Use of telehealth technologies

In order to allow for the safe continuation of the trial during the pandemic and to make it feasible to reach out to patients who are unable to attend personally (e.g. due to quarantine or travel restrictions), telehealth technologies have been introduced to the trial. Telehealth technologies must be certified for the use in the German health care system and employed in full concordance with the guidelines for video-based therapy issued by the German federal chamber of psychotherapists [3] and the respective currently valid guidelines of the regional chambers of the federal states. In addition, participants in the YOURTREAT project are required to have a telephone connection in place (e.g. mobile phone) and to provide the clinician with the telephone number for the event of disruptions in the internet connection. Before conducting a telehealth-based appointment, the following conditions must be met: (1) the participant has been informed about the nature and particularities of a telehealth-based appointment and an additional informed consent for the application of telehealth has been obtained. (2) Acute suicidality has been ruled out through the evaluation of the qualified clinician. In case either (1) or (2) does not apply, the appointment cannot be conducted via telehealth.

Diagnostic interviews can be conducted using telehealth technologies at all time points of the study (t1: pre therapy, t2: 6-month follow-up, t3: 12-month follow-up). In order to avoid a high variability in treatment provision, which might limit the interpretability of the trial results, the use of telehealth technologies for KIDNET therapy sessions should be the exception. Instead, KIDNET should be provided face-to-face following strict hygienic measurements to reduce the risk of an infection. However, telehealth can be allowed in special cases that need to be justified (e.g. to ensure the completion of a therapy during contact-ban, for cases that belong to a high risk group, for cases in quarantine). In case an interpreter is required for a diagnostic and/or therapeutic process, he or she can join the session using telehealth if the participant agrees and if this is perceived as practicable by both therapist and patient.

(2) Reduction of the diagnostic set

To account for the additional logistical efforts of diagnostic procedures provided through telehealth, some items and instruments have been removed from the diagnostic batteries. For the t1 assessment, single items from the sociodemographic information, mobile phone use, and the asset list have been removed. For t2 and t3 measurements, the same questions have been removed, as well as the event checklists and the questionnaires post-migration living conditions and Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index (ADDI) (see Fig. 1 for an overview). Although the diagnostic set had to be shortened, the primary outcomes and the main secondary outcomes remain unimpaired by the amendment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Displayed are the standard protocol items (SPIRIT) for the clinical trial YOURTREAT including enrolment, diagnostic assessments, and interventions—reduction to the most essential elements. -ADDI, Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index; CAPS-CA-5, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 – Child/Adolescent Version; C-SSRS, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; HSCL-37a, Hopkins symptom checklist-37 for refugee adolescents; KIDNET, Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children; PC-PTSD-5, Primary Care Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5; RHS-15, Refugee Health Screener-15; (S)AE, (serious) adverse event; SITBI-G, German version of the self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview; SOMS-7, Screening for Somatoform Symptoms 7; TAU, treatment as usual; WAEC, War and Adversities Exposure Checklist. Single asterisk (*) indicates the following: next to established recruitment procedures of the study centers, participants can be recruited and screened by Intercultural Therapy Assistants as an entryway into the trial. Double asterisk (**) indicates the following: TAU: patients will be instructed to seek treatment within the general health care system. Therefore, in contrast to KIDNET, the duration of TAU cannot be specified a priori

(3) Increased flexibility in the time frame of the trial

To account for the uncertain and unsteady conditions of the trial during the pandemic which are likely to result in delays in the therapeutic or diagnostic processes, we increased the flexibility of the time frame of the trial. The tolerance window of assessments at the post and follow-up timepoints is extended to 4 weeks before until 4 weeks after the scheduled timepoint. The tolerance window for the beginning and ending of the NET has been extended from 1 to 2 weeks. However, the uncertain conditions of the trial may require deviations even from the extended time windows in single cases. If an assessment or therapy appointments should not be possible within the time frame, the procedure should be completed with minimum delay. The reasons for the deviation as well as the details of the delay need to be documented.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trial

At the beginning of the pandemic, in March 2020, the trial was in the initiation phase: Two out of four study centers had already started recruitment, while the remaining two centers prepared for the start of recruitment. A total number of 15 participants had been randomized, and four 6-month follow-up assessments had been completed. Since recruitment activities (e.g., outreach at school, youth centers or refugee accommodations) represented main activities at this stage of the trial, the restrictions due to the pandemic significantly slowed down recruitment into the trial. Therefore, we applied for an extension of the trial activities for 2 years, which was approved by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Discussion

The aim of the amendment of the clinical trial YOURTREAT was to allow the continuation of the trial after a careful risk assessment. The current pandemic and the corresponding protocol amendments might increase unsystematic variance in the trial. However, since the treatment under investigation, KIDNET, will be conducted face-to-face as originally planned (except for singe cases that need to be justified), the interpretability of the trial results will not be compromised by the protocol changes.

Further, COVID-19-associated impacts on the trial (e.g. canceled appointments due to COVID-19 infections or quarantine of patients) will be carefully documented in order to allow us to investigate the potential impact of the pandemic on the trial.

Given that the mental health burden is globally increased by the pandemic [4] and the fact that refugees have a higher probability to be exposed to COVID-19-associated risk factors such as isolation, crowded housing, economic insecurity, or familial violence [5], the importance of short and pragmatic interventions for this population has been escalated by the pandemic. Therefore, the results of the trial YOURTREAT are urgently needed to inform the regular health care system on effective treatment options for the particularly vulnerable group of young refugees.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

References

  1. Wilker S, Catani C, Wittmann J, Preusse M, Schmidt T, May T, et al. The efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children (KIDNET) as a treatment for traumatized young refugees versus treatment as usual: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (YOURTREAT). Trials. 2020;21(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4127-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiely F, Foley J, Stone A, Cobbe E, Browne S, Murphy E, et al. Managing clinical trials during COVID-19: experience from a clinical research facility. Trials. 2021;22(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-05004-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer. Praxis-Info Videobehandlung; 2019. https://www.bptk.de/neue-praxis-info-videobehandlung/. Accessed 11 Feb 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinzón-Espinosa J, Valdés-Florido MJ, Riboldi I, Baysak E, Vieta E. The COVID-19 pandemic and mental health of refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants. J Affect Disord. 2021;280(Pt A):407–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research is funding the project.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; 01GL1749C). The sponsor of the trial is Bielefeld University (Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sarah Wilker drafted the original study protocol under supervision of Frank Neuner and Claudia Catani. Melissa Preusse, Jasmin Wittmann, Telja Schmidt, Sina Neldner, and Verena Ertl developed the changes to the study protocol outlined in this update under supervision of Frank Neuner and Claudia Catani. Sarah Wilker and Jasmin Wittmann prepared the manuscript for the update. All authors critically revised the study update and approved this version (1.6.) of the study protocol.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmin Wittmann.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the German Psychological Association approved the original study protocol (approval date: 6 May 2019). This study protocol update has been submitted as an amendment to the ethical committee of the German Psychological Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie). Approval has been granted on 25 July 2020.

Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants before study participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wittmann, J., Groß, M., Catani, C. et al. The efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy for Children (KIDNET) as a treatment for traumatized young refugees versus treatment as usual: update to the study protocol for the multi-center randomized controlled trial YOURTREAT. Trials 23, 360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06288-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06288-8

Keywords