Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Efficacy of electroacupuncture in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 22, Article number: 702 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Persistent pain following back surgery called failed back surgery syndrome remains a major treatment challenge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture on relieving back pain in FBSS patients.

Methods/design

This is a randomized, single-blind, single-site, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 144 eligible FBSS patients will be randomly assigned to the electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, or sham acupuncture group in a 1:1:1 ratio. Each group will receive 2 treatment sessions per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome will be low back pain intensity based on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes include Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and analgesic consumption. All clinical outcomes will be collected at baseline, during the treatment phase (at 8 and 12 weeks), and at the 16-, 24- and 36-week follow-ups. All data will be analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle and adverse events will be assessed during the trial.

Discussion

This pilot randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture for treating failed back surgery syndrome. The outcomes will determine whether electroacupuncture is efficacious in relieving low back pain as well as improving the quality of life in failed back surgery syndrome patients.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000040144. Registered on 22 November 2020

Peer Review reports

Background

“Failed back surgery syndrome” (FBSS) is characterized by persistent or recurrent back and/or radiating leg pain, even after anatomically successful spinal surgery [1]. Despite the advances made in lumber surgical technologies, the incidence of FBSS is still reported in the range of 10 to 40% [2]. Chronic pain following FBSS can always interfere with physical, emotional, and social components of life, resulting in a considerable financial burden on the society [3].

Due to the complex etiologies and mixed neuropathic and nociceptive pain components, few management guidelines existed for FBSS [4,5,6]. In general, FBSS without structural deficit was usually managed with conservative treatments, including oral medication, nerve blocks, pulsed radiofrequency, and physiotherapy [7, 8]. FBSS cases with poor response to conservative treatments are often treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) [9]. However, SCS requires implantation of a permanent pulse generator and the implant materials are expensive, which is not suitable for all medical conditions and patients. Therefore, finding the optimal management of FBSS as a therapy that was effective, less complicated, and not invasive in nature has been always desired.

Acupuncture is a therapeutic intervention originated in China, which can treat diseases by the insertion of thin metallic needles through the skin at specific sites [10]. In recent years, acupuncture has been used as an integrative therapy for pain since well-tolerated with little risk of adverse effects [11]. Numerous systematic reviews have investigated that acupuncture has a therapeutic effect on chronic low back pain [12, 13]. And the mechanisms of acupuncture analgesic effect were reported to involve endogenous pain control systems, cerebral plasticity, and nonspecific effects [14].

Electroacupuncture (EA) is the application of electrical stimulation to acupuncture needles. Several studies demonstrated that EA exerted a quicker and stronger analgesic effect than manual acupuncture [15, 16]. Furthermore, evidence-based results also showed that EA was better than high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or sham acupuncture in the treatment of neuropathic pain [17]. However, the efficacy of EA or acupuncture for FBSS has not been reported specifically. Therefore, we designed this rigorous high-quality randomized controlled trial to provide valid evidence for the efficacy of EA in treating FBSS, compared with manual acupuncture and sham acupuncture treatment.

Methods

Study design and setting

This is a patient- and assessor-blind randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that will be conducted at Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Eligible FBSS participants will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 24 sessions of electroacupuncture (EA), manual acupuncture (MA), or sham acupuncture (SA) over a 12-week treatment period and a 6-month follow-up period. The study will follow the recommendations of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) [18] and the protocol was reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items (SPIRIT) (Additional file 1). A flow chart of the study process is detailed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study procedures

Full size image

Recruitment and ethics

The recruitment will be conducted at Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Patients will be recruited throughout the patient clinic and hospital-based WeChat advertising. This study has been approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2020-SHL-KY-40), registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040144), and will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants will be prioritized and asked to sign the informed consent before enrollment and have been given adequate time to consider what the trial involves. The study schedule of enrolment, intervention, and assessments is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedule of enrollment, intervention, and assessments
Full size table

Inclusion criteria

Individuals will be recruited for the study if they satisfy the following criteria:

1. Aged 18–80 years

2. Primary diagnosis of FBSS [19] (in this study, FBSS is defined as low back and leg pain persist or recur for at least 6 months following at least one decompression and/or fusion procedure) and not requiring further surgery

3. Average low back pain score ≥6 on a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS)

4. On a stable dose of pain medications for at least 2 weeks prior to screening and willing to decrease the pain medication dose during the study

5. No evidence of failure to improve substantially with conservative management including but not limited to physical therapy, acupuncture, exercises, drug therapy, and bedrest

6. Willing to prohibit any treatment that may affect trial results other than acupuncture treatment

7. Competent to understand the study protocol and volunteer to write informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

Individuals will be excluded if they have any of the following criteria:

1. Specific serious diseases that would be possible causes of spinal pain (e.g., malignant tumors, vertebral fractures, spinal infection, inflammatory spondylitis, cauda equina syndrome)

2. Consistent severe pain (10 out of 10 NRS) without fluctuation

3. Unsuitable for acupuncture or at risk of acupuncture-associated safety complications (e.g., hemorrhagic disease, patients under anticoagulant treatment, severe diabetes with risk of infection, serious cardiovascular or renal disease, skin lesions at the acupuncture site)

4. Medical conditions that would potentially influence the interpretation of treatment effect or results (e.g., diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, dementia, psychiatric disease)

5. Pregnancy or planning pregnancy during the study period

6. Participation in another clinical study that would confound data

7. Unresolved issues of secondary gain (e.g., pending litigation)

Randomization and allocation concealment

A randomization sequence will be computer generated by the statistician (Qi Zhang) who is not involved in the later statistical work of the study with SPSS 23.0 software, using block randomization with a block size of three or six. An independent researcher will prepare the sealed envelopes to ensure concealment of the allocation sequence. Eligible FBSS patients will be randomly assigned to the EA, MA, or SA group in a 1:1:1 ratio. Only the acupuncturist who performs the treatment will know the group allocation at the time of treatment.

Blinding

Although it is not practical to blind the acupuncturists to treatment allocations, all of the participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians will be subject to blinding. To achieve successful blinding, a pragmatic placebo needle will be employed and a sham acupuncture design will be applied, and all researchers will be trained before the trial begins.

Qualification of practitioners

Only licensed acupuncturists with at least 3 years of acupuncture experience will perform the treatment. All the acupuncturists will be instructed in standardized operating procedures prior to the start of the study, such as the location of acupoints and the depth of needling.

Interventions

The interventions will be applied to eligible FBSS patients in three groups for 30 min for 24 sessions over 12 weeks (2 sessions per week). During the treatment, each patient will be placed in a separate quiet space and lying in the prone position, receiving one of the three treatments: electroacupuncture, manual acupuncture, or sham acupuncture. All the acupuncture procedures will follow the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) [20]. The location of acupoints for treating FBSS is shown in Fig. 2. In order to improve participants’ adherence, participants will accept the treatment for free and receive financial subsidies (200 RMB) after the last follow-up assessment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Location of acupoints for FBSS

Full size image

The electroacupuncture group

Treatment will be performed using sterilized disposable steel needles (size, 0.35mm × 75mm; Wuxi Jiajian Medical Instrument Co., Ltd, Wuxi, China). Patients will receive acupuncture at bilateral acupuncture points Jiaji (EX-B2. L3, located 0.5cun [≈10mm] lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the third lumbar vertebra), Jiaji (EX-B2. L4, located 0.5cun [≈10mm] lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the fourth lumbar vertebra), and Jiaji (EXB2. L5, located 0.5cun [≈10mm] lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the fifth lumbar vertebra). All acupoints were selected according to the literature [21, 22] and our clinical experience, located with reference to the WHO Standard Acupuncture Locations. After skin disinfection, needles will be inserted perpendicularly for all selected acupuncture points to a depth of 40 to 60mm. After achieving needling sensation [23], an electric stimulator (Huayi BT701-1B; Shanghai Huayi Medical Appliance Factory, Shanghai, China) will be connected to two pairs of needles (EX-B2. L3- EX-B2. L5 bilaterally) to deliver a continuous wave-type pulse at 20-Hz frequency current of 2mA. All needles will be retained for 30 min before removal.

The manual acupuncture group

Patients in the manual acupuncture group will undergo similar procedures as the electroacupuncture group except there will be no current output from the electrical apparatus. Sham electrical stimulation technique will be used with the needles connected to functioning electrical stimulators via broken wires.

The sham acupuncture group

In the sham acupuncture group, the sham acupuncture device Streitberger placebo needle will be used [24]. The acupoints, electrode placements, and other treatment settings are the same as for the sham electroacupuncture group but with no needling sensation.

Scheme of analgesic use

The enrolled patients will be allowed to receive celecoxib capsules (Pfizer Pharmaceutica Co. Ltd., New York State, USA) orally on request with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day during the study treatments. The analgesia consumption will be recorded as research data.

Permitted and prohibited concomitant treatments

During the treatment and follow-up period, participants will not be allowed to initiate any more pain control interventions, which includes but is not limited to other pain blocks, medications, surgeries, and physical therapy. However, general light exercises will be allowed. The researchers will advise the participants to avoid other treatments and re-emphasize at each evaluation time point. Once an individual has utilized other cointerventions, this information should be reported to investigators and recorded for analysis.

Evaluation

Eligibility was assessed during an initial screening visit. Consent was obtained from all candidates, after which demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, body mass index), duration of pain in months, medical and surgical history, physical examination, segmental level of surgery, and radiographic investigations were taken.

Outcomes

The primary outcome will be pain intensity of low back. The secondary outcomes will be functional disability, depression symptoms, sleep quality, and analgesic consumption. All outcome data were collected at baseline, during the treatment phase (at 8 and 12 weeks), and at the 16-, 24-, and 36-week follow-ups.

Primary outcome measurement

The primary outcome measure is the pain intensity of the low back assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) [9]. Patients will record their low back pain two times per day on a diary for 3 days prior to assessment. The pain intensity for each assessment was calculated as the average NRS available during that period.

Secondary outcome measurements

Functional disability

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire will be used to assess functional disability due to FBSS. This questionnaire consists of 10-item scales with 6 response categories each. Each item scores from 0 to 5, which are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale, with scores 0 to 20 have a minimal disability, 21 to 40 have a moderate disability, 41 to 60 have a severe disability, 61 to 80 are crippled, and 81 to 100 are bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms. A change in ODI of 6% is considered clinically meaningful [25].

Depression symptoms

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is an instrument that assesses the severity of depression. It contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 and the final score ranges between 0 and 63 points, which reflects the presence of depressiveness and severity thereof. The scores for depression are minimal (<14), mild (14–19), moderate (20–28), and severe (>28). Respondents are instructed to answer the items based on how they have been feeling over the past 2 weeks [26].

Sleep quality

FBSS-associated sleep quality disturbance was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI questionnaire is composed of 19 items that yield 7 component scores, each component yields a score ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction. A total score of >5 is identified as disordered sleep [27].

Analgesic consumption

Celecoxib will be the only available analgesic, and the total amount was divided by the follow-up period to detect the daily requirement at each follow-up interval. The investigators will also offer free consultation during the trial and use tablets returned every follow-up interval to increase the participants’ compliance.

Adverse events

Common adverse events (AEs) in acupuncture clinical trials include subcutaneous hematoma, fainting, continuous post-needling pain, and allergies at the sites of needle insertion [28]. Patients with any undesirable effect during the trial will be advised to contact their acupuncturists. The acupuncturists will treat the adverse reactions immediately and contact relevant researchers. All the details (include the time of occurrence, symptoms, duration of symptoms) of AEs will be reported by researchers in the case report forms (CRFs) and the ethics committee immediately. Participants have the rights to take any medical treatment to alleviate uncomfortable symptoms whether it is or not caused by the intervention. The ethics committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine takes responsibility for deciding whether to suspend the trial once any AE occurs. After accessing and investigating the cause of adverse events, relevant free medical treatment and appropriate financial compensation will be made to participants.

Withdrawal

Investigators will evaluate the participants who find their low back pain cannot be alleviated by acupuncture (base on a NRS score ≥6) or have serious AEs (severe infection, coma, shock) to discontinue the study. Furthermore, participants can discontinue the treatment at any time for any reason. All discontinued participants’ data will be treated as missing data.

Data collection and management

Clinical data will be collected using the printed CRFs, which will be stored securely in a locked cabinet in the office at the hospital. Two independent investigators will enter the data into the clinical trial management platform ResMan and check for double entry to ensure the accuracy of data [29]. All electronic datasets will be de-identified and password protected. Both paper files and electronic documents are accessed to only authorized researchers. After verification, the database will be locked and delivered for statistical analysis. All original CRFs and consent forms will be kept strictly confidential and preserved for 10 years after publication. Only if there exists a life-threatening emergency event when it is a must to know the allocated intervention which participant has received, unblinding is permissible and the researcher can reveal the allocated details in the sealed envelope. Once unblinding occurred, the participant should be discontinued in the trial and the investigator should record the reason for the discontinuation in CRF.

Monitoring

The trial will be conducted by the Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine who will be responsible for coordinating, developing, and controlling the quality of all the programs. For the purpose of monitoring data, an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be set up to review the trial data every month to ensure its accuracy and authenticity. The members of the DSMB who all have declared no conflict of interest in this trial will take the role of evaluating the safety of participants during the trial, monitoring the study progress, guaranteeing the accuracy and completeness of data, and providing recommendations to continuing, modifying, suspending, or terminating the study. Besides, any revisions of the protocol will be discussed by the ethics committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine timely.

Sample size

The trial was aimed to determine whether there was a difference among the EA group, MA group, and SA group in terms of NRS scores. The sample size was calculated based on the previous study [30] through the PASS system (version 15.0.5), with the assumption of the difference in the mean NRS scores between the MA group and SA group as 1.5 and the standard deviation as 2.0. Thirty-nine participants per group would be required to provide 90% power with a two-sided significance level of 5%. Therefore, considering a 20% dropout rate, a total of 144 participants will be recruited eventually in the study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS (version 9.4) by an independent statistician totally blinded to the group allocation. All data will be analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle, including the missing data from dropouts which will be substituted into the collected data in the last assessment. For measurement data, if the data is in conformity to normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, data values will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (MD±SD) and covariance analysis will be applied to compare data between groups. If the data does not comply with the normal distribution, median (P25, P75) will be adopted to describe it and the Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test will be applied for the comparison between groups. For categorical data, data can be presented as frequency, composition ratio, or rate on the basis of data results. When it comes to dichotomous or unordered multinomial data, the X2 test will be used to compare the difference between groups, whereas the rank sum test will be adopted to analyze data when it belongs to ordered multinomial value. A two-sided P < 0.05 will be considered as significance for all statistical comparisons.

Discussion

Integration of acupuncture into clinical pain management is expanding rapidly due to the effort of reducing reliance on traditional analgesics. Mounting evidence supports the analgesic effect of acupuncture in the diseases such as low back pain, neck pain, cancer pain et al. [12, 31, 32]. However, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study about EA relieving FBSS symptoms has not been reported. This trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EA in patients with FBSS. We hope the results of this study will contribute to clinical practice by providing evidence and provide a low-risk beneficial nondrug therapy for FBSS patients.

Although manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture have obvious therapeutic effects compared to sham acupuncture, the efficacy between manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture that is superior is still controversial [33]. In this study, we separate these two treatments and thus can evaluate the effects separately. We also expect the results of this pilot RCT can provide relevant evidence, which can promote the clinical application of EA as acupuncture analgesia for FBSS.

There are still some limitations and challenges in this study. First, it is impossible to blind the acupuncturists with regard to treatment allocation. Second, due to the sample size, the study may not be able to have enough power to test the difference between manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture. Furthermore, although acupuncture has been demonstrated to be effective in numerous lumbar diseases, FBSS caused by different etiologies may lead to the diversity of acupuncture treatment effects. In a word, we will strive to standardize any step of the study to obtain a high research quality. We hope the results of this study will provide reliable evidence and clarify the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture in FBSS.

Trial status

Protocol: version 1.0, 25 October 2020.

The study launched on 31 December 2020. And now participant recruitment is in progress. Participant recruitment and data collection are expected to be completed by the end of December 2022.

Availability of data and materials

The data in this trial will be publicly available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data and the protocol will be available after publication in peer-reviewed international journals for 3 years.

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

BDI-II:

Beck Depression Inventory-II

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

EA:

Electroacupuncture

FBSS:

Failed back surgery syndrome

NRS:

Numerical rating scale

ODI:

Oswestry Disability Index

PSQI:

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SA:

Sham acupuncture

SCS:

Spinal cord stimulation

MA:

Manual electroacupuncture

SPIRIT:

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials; Standard protocol items

STRICTA:

Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture

TENS:

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

References

  1. Rigoard P, Gatzinsky K, Deneuville JP, Duyvendak W, Naiditch N, Van Buyten JP, et al. Optimizing the management and outcomes of failed back surgery syndrome: a consensus statement on definition and outlines for patient assessment. Pain Res Manag. 2019;2019:3126464–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3126464.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomson S, Jacques L. Demographic characteristics of patients with severe neuropathic pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract. 2009;9(3):206–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00276.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breivik H, Eisenberg E, O'Brien T. The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatzinsky K, Eldabe S, Deneuville JP, Duyvendak W, Naiditch N, Van Buyten JP, et al. Optimizing the management and outcomes of failed back surgery syndrome: a proposal of a standardized multidisciplinary team care pathway. Pain Res Manag. 2019;2019:8184592–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8184592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebaaly A, Lahoud MJ, Rizkallah M, Kreichati G, Kharrat K. Etiology, evaluation, and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Asian Spine Journal. 2018;12(3):574–85. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Desai MJ, Nava A, Rigoard P, Shah B, Taylor RS. Optimal medical, rehabilitation and behavioral management in the setting of failed back surgery syndrome. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61:S66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Canos A, Cort L, Fernández Y, Rovira V, Pallarés J, Barberá M, et al. Preventive analgesia with pregabalin in neuropathic pain from “failed back surgery syndrome”: assessment of sleep quality and disability. Pain Med. 2016;17(2):344–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kallewaard JW, Nijhuis H, Huygen F, Wille F, Zuidema X, van de Minkelis J, et al. Prospective cohort analysis of DRG stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome pain following lumbar discectomy. Pain Pract. 2019;19(2):204–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Andres J, Monsalve-Dolz V, Fabregat-Cid G, Villanueva-Perez V, Harutyunyan A, Asensio-Samper JM, et al. Prospective, randomized blind effect-on-outcome study of conventional vs high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with pain and disability due to failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med. 2017;18(12):2401–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. White A, Ernst E. A brief history of acupuncture. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(5):662–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keg005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly RB, Willis J. Acupuncture for pain. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100(2):89–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang Y, He JY, Tian HH, Cao BY, Li R. Evidence of efficacy of acupuncture in the management of low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo- or sham-controlled trials. Acupunct Med. 2020;38(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2017-011445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):493–505. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang R, Lao L, Ren K, Berman BM. Mechanisms of acupuncture-electroacupuncture on persistent pain. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(2):482–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schliessbach J, van der Klift E, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M, Streitberger K. The effect of brief electrical and manual acupuncture stimulation on mechanical experimental pain. Pain Med. 2011;12(2):268–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01051.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng Z, Feng SJ, Costa C, Li CG, Lu D, Xue CC. Acupuncture analgesia for temporal summation of experimental pain: a randomised controlled study. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(7):725–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cruccu G, Aziz TZ, Garcia-Larrea L, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Lefaucheur JP, et al. EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14(9):952–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01916.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2016;355:i5239.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomson S. Failed back surgery syndrome - definition, epidemiology and demographics. Br J Pain. 2013;7(1):56–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463713479096.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst K, Rose K, Niemtzow R. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendations. STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture. Acupunct Med. 2002;20(1):22–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.20.1.22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan Y, Wu Y. Effect of electroacupuncture on muscle state and infrared thermogram changes in patients with acute lumbar muscle sprain. J Traditional Chin Med = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan. 2015;35(5):499–506.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Zhao J, Tian Y. Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a protocol for a cohort study, Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan. 2019;39(1):127–32.

  23. Yang XY, Shi GX, Li QQ, Zhang ZH, Xu Q, Liu CZ. Characterization of deqi sensation and acupuncture effect. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:319734–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/319734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Xie CC, Wen XY, Jiang L, Xie MJ, Fu WB. Validity of the “Streitberger” needle in a Chinese population with acupuncture: a randomized, single-blinded, and crossover pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:251603–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/251603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001;81(2):776–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.2.776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G: Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.); 1996.

  27. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Capili B, Anastasi JK, Geiger JN. Adverse event reporting in acupuncture clinical trials focusing on pain. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(1):43–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b2c985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Society for Clinical Data Management (SCDM). Good clinical data management practices (GCDMP), 2007. Available at: http://www.scdm.org/publications/gcdmp/

  30. Cho YJ, Song YK, Cha YY, Shin BC, Shin IH, Park HJ, et al. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a multicenter, randomized, patient-assessor blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Spine. 2013;38(7):549–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318275e601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seo SY, Lee KB, Shin JS, Lee J, Kim MR, Ha IH, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture and electroacupuncture for chronic neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Chin Med. 2017;45(8):1573–95. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X17500859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. He Y, Guo X, May BH, Zhang AL, Liu Y, Lu C, et al. Clinical evidence for association of acupuncture and acupressure with improved cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(2):271–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Langevin HM, Schnyer R, MacPherson H, Davis R, Harris RE, Napadow V, Wayne PM, Milley RJ, Lao L, Stener-Victorin E et al: Manual and electrical needle stimulation in acupuncture research: pitfalls and challenges of heterogeneity. J Altern Complement Med 2015, 21(3):113-128.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants.

Funding

The study is partly sponsored by the Shanghai Sailing Program (No.19YF1445300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82004183), and the Medical Research Program of Shanghai Xuhui District (SHXH201947). The study funder has no role in the study design, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoping Sheng, Hongyu Yue, and Qi Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 274 Middle Zhijiang Road, Shanghai, 200071, China

    Xiaoping Sheng, Hongyu Yue, Deta Chen, Weidong Qiu, Jun Tang, Tianyou Fan, Jingliang Gu, Bingchen Jiang, Minlei Qiu & Lin Chen

  2. Shanghai Xuhui District Xietu Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, 200032, China

    Qi Zhang

Authors
  1. Xiaoping Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongyu Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deta Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weidong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tianyou Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jingliang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bingchen Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Minlei Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LC is the principal investigator and project lead. XPS, HYY, QZ, and MLQ conceived and designed the study. DTC, WDQ, JT, TYF, JLG, and BCJ advised and contributed to the trial design. XPS, HYY, and QZ drafted the manuscript. LC and QZ sought funding and ethical approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minlei Qiu or Lin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol has approved ethical approval by the ethics committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (certificate number 2020SHL-KY-40, approved 4 November 2020). Each participant should provide written informed consent prior to enrolment in the RCT.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:.

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 checklist: recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, X., Yue, H., Zhang, Q. et al. Efficacy of electroacupuncture in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 22, 702 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05652-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05652-4

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215