Skip to main content

The cerebral mechanism underlying the acupoints with specific effect for gallbladder stone disease: protocol for a randomized controlled task-fMRI trial

Abstract

Background

As it has been recorded in ancient Chinese classics, Yanglingquan (GB34) and Dannangxue (EX-LE6) are two important acupoints that can regulate the function of the gallbladder. Acupuncture at these two acupoints is considered particularly effective for gallbladder disease treatment, especially for alleviating gallbladder stone disease (GSD) symptoms that can be aggravated after intaking high-fat food. However, the superior effect between the two acupoints still needs to be further explored, as well as the underlying central mechanism has never been investigated to date.

Methods and design

Ninety participants diagnosed with GSD will be randomly divided into group A (acupuncture at GB34), group B (acupuncture at EX-LE6), and group C (acupuncture at non-acupoint) in a ratio of 1:1:1. All of them will receive a 30-min acupuncture treatment with fatty-food cues being presented before and after acupuncture. During the task, participants will be scanned by MRI and required to rate their desire for high-/low-fat food with an 11-point Likert scale. Additionally, the participants’ pain/discomfort sensation will be evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at four timepoints, including before the 1st task fMRI scan, before and after acupuncture, and after the 2nd task fMRI scan. For both behavior and fMRI data, the ANOVA analysis will be conducted among three groups to testify the immediate effect of GB34 and EX-LE6. The post hoc t-test will be employed to further explore the superiority between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6. Furthermore, correlation analyses will be conducted to investigate a possible correlation between neural changes and clinical data.

Discussion

In comparison to the non-acupoint, the results will firstly explore the superior effect between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 on GSD patients by observing their behavioral and neural response change to fatty-food cue, and then to investigate the underlying central mechanism.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000034368. Registered on 3 July 2020.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acupoint specificity is considered as one of the core scientific issues with respect to acupuncture practice [1]. According to the theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), stimulation on acupoints elicits active responses that can have specific function for disease treatment [2]. In addition, the superior effect of acupuncture at acupoints on the disease-affected meridian (DAM) compared to those acupoints on the nonaffected meridian and sham ones has been demonstrated in several clinical studies [3,4,5]. It is speculated that the benefit of acupuncture on the DAM contributes to acupoint specificity. There are different kinds of acupoints with specific effect. For instance, the lower He-sea points are thought particularly effective for visceral disease treatment. Some extraordinary acupoints that belong to non-meridian points still have a therapeutic effect for visceral disease based on the millennium of clinical practice by ancient Chinese. However, differences among these acupoints and the underlying central mechanism still need to be further explored.

Acupuncture has been used to manage gastrointestinal and biliary pain and discomforts for thousands of years. Nowadays, it is gradually being accepted as an alternative and effective therapy in western countries for digestive disorders [6,7,8]. As one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal conditions and being associated with the highest socioeconomic costs [9,10,11], gallbladder stone disease (GSD) represents a significant public health problem in western countries, affecting 10–15% of adults [12]. In the USA alone, gallstones are present in 8 to 20% of the population by the age of 40 years [13, 14].

GSD is defined by the main occurrence of symptoms or complications caused by gallstones in the gallbladder and/or the bile ducts. Biliary colic (BC) is the main symptom of gallstone disease, and in addition, GSD patients often live with intolerance to fried or fatty foods (characterized by nausea, vomiting, and bloating) [15]. High-fat foods may strongly aggravate patients’ BC accompanying dyspeptic symptoms. Nowadays, the treatment algorithms for GSD remain predominantly invasive and based on surgery [16]. However, only about 60% of patients report the absence of abdominal pain after surgery [17]. In addition to that, the majority of them still have a limitation of fat in the diet, accompanying with some dyspeptic symptoms following the intake of fatty food, such as abdominal distension, nausea, and so on [18, 19]. These discomforts caused by high-fatty foods greatly compromised GSD patient’s quality of life.

Early in 2002, the World Health Organization reported that acupuncture is effective for BC [20]. Based on the meridian and viscera theory in traditional Chinese medicine, the acupoint of Yanglingquan (GB34), as the lower He-sea points of the gallbladder, has a specific effect for gallbladder disease. The extraordinary acupoints of Dannangxue (EX-LE6) are an experience point for treating gallbladder disease. Both the GB34 and EX-LE6 are frequently chosen in the clinic. And randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that these two acupoints have satisfactory efficacy in relieving GSD patients’ discomforts [21,22,23].

Acupuncture is considered to have a regulating effect on the biliary system, including inhibiting the contractions of Oddi’s sphincter, bi-directionally regulating the gallbladder pressure, promoting the secretion of hepatic bile, and changing the content of the cholesterol in plasma and bile, and in further to reduce the formation rate of cholelithiasis, the number of gallstones, and the huge gallstones [24,25,26,27,28]. Recently, acupuncture on GB34 is found specifically activated the cognitive, motor, default network, and other parts of brain regions [29,30,31,32]. However, the underlying central effect of GB34 and EX-LE6 on the gallbladder of patients with GBD has not been covered.

In recent decades, the application of task fMRI makes it possible to provide evidence of human’s cerebral and behavioral response towards acupuncture stimulation [33,34,35]. Hence, in order to testify the hypothesis that either acupuncture with GB34 or EX-LE6 is superior in alleviating GSD patients’ symptoms compared to acupuncture with the non-acupoint, a fatty-food-cue task during MRI scan is designed to induce pain and accompanied discomforts of GSD patients and then the GSD patients’ behavioral and neural response change among all three groups before and after acupuncture will be compared. Therefore, the primary objective is to testify the therapeutic effect of acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 in comparison to the non-acupoint and then further explore the superior effect between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 and finally investigate the potential central mechanism underlying acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6.

Methods and design

Study design

This is a parallel, randomized controlled task-fMRI study. Ninety participants will be recruited in this study, with 30 participants in each group.

All participants in three groups will receive once 30-min immediate acupuncture stimulation. Clinical measurements and behavioral data of all participants during the task-fMRI scan will be assessed before and after the acupuncture treatment (Figs. 1 and 2). The protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the 1st Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM (2019KL-029) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (NO: ChiCTR2000034368). This trial is reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines [36] (Additional file 1) and follows the principles of the CONSORT and STRICTA [37].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study schedule: 90 eligible participants will be randomly allocated into three groups with a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients in each group will be randomly selected to undergo an fMRI scan. Imaging data and clinical data will be collected at baseline and at the end of the acupuncture treatment. GSD gallstone disease, fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging

Fig. 2
figure 2

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) schedule of the trial. This is a randomized controlled trial which includes a 2-day baseline period and one acupuncture treatment. In the baseline period, recruited patients will be screened according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria; then, eligible GSD patients will give informed consent and receive a physical examination. After allocation, the patients will receive once GB34 acupuncture, EX-LE6 acupuncture, or non-acupoint. The outcome assessments and fMRI scans are performed at baseline and at the end of acupuncture. In addition, a physical examination will be performed at the baseline. Adverse events will be recorded in the CRFs at any time during treatment. fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging, SF-12 12-item Short Form Health Survey, NRS Numeric Rating Scale, SAS Self-rating Anxiety Scale, SDS Self-rating Depression Scale

Study setting and recruitment

The study will be carried out from August 2020 to December 2021 at the 1st Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM. The study will recruit participants with GSD, who meet the diagnostic criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) [38] through outpatient and inpatient departments as well as social media platforms. Trained researchers will conduct participant screening.

Participants

Inclusion criteria

(1) Age between 18 and 60 years and right-handed with normal or corrected-to-normal vision; (2) recurrent pain in the right upper abdomen over 3 months, accompanying with the aversion to high-fat food, nausea, bloating, etc.; (3) not taken any nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Chinese herbs, or other treatments for GSD within 2 weeks; (4) acupuncture naïve; and (5) signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

(1) Calculus in the bile duct; (2) acute cholecystitis, acute suppurative, gangrenous, incarcerated cholecystitis, and perforation of the gallbladder with diffuse peritonitis, etc.; (3) serious complications or primary diseases such as the cerebral, cardiovascular, liver, kidney, endocrine, and hematopoietic system; (4) severe digestive system diseases, such as peptic ulcer, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, gastric tumor, Crohn’s disease, irritable bowel syndrome, etc.; (5) white blood cells (WBCs) > 15 × 109/L with systemic inflammatory response; (6) mental disorders such as serious anxiety and depression (the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores ≥70 or the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores ≥72); (7) having serious headache or migraine or having a history of head trauma or other central nervous system abnormalities; (8) being on weight-loss diets or taking other medications; (9) pregnancy or lactating women; (10) participating in any other clinical trials in the past 3 months; (11) received any acupuncture treatment in recent 1 month; (12) MRI contraindications, such as claustrophobia or implanted ferromagnetic metal.

Drop out criteria

(1) Quitting themselves during research; (2) not following the requirements; (3) having serious illnesses, complications, or adverse events during research; (4) showing emotional instability or having drunk coffee, strong tea, or alcohol before fMRI scan.

Informed consent and participant safety

If participants are eligible and interested in taking part in the study, they will be fully informed of the project information including the study procedures, benefits, and potential risks. Then, participants will be required to sign the informed consent to enter the study and have equal opportunities to receive proper treatment. Participants will be informed that they are free to withdraw from the study without penalty at any time.

To provide an overview of the health status of each participant, participants in this study would undergo a health evaluation including abdominal ultrasound, blood biochemical test, and electrocardiogram examination. During the acupuncture treatment, any adverse events such as pain, bleeding, fainting, or other severe events should be processed immediately and recorded in the case report forms (CRFs) carefully. In the food-cue task stage, any intolerable symptoms should be processed immediately and recorded in the CRFs carefully. In addition, we will follow up the patients twice within 1 month after the end of the experiment (once every 2 weeks) to ask whether they have any adverse reactions related to acupuncture or MRI.

Randomization

Eligible GSD participants will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1 to group A (GB34), group B (EX-LE6), and group C (non-acupoint), with 30 patients in each group. Random sequence will be generated by a third-party using computer, placed in sealed opaque envelopes, and opened by an independent assistant in consecutive order.

Blinding

Acupuncturists will not be blinded to treatment allocation for the different locations in each group. However, it is feasible to separate participants, outcome assessors, and statistical analysts. Participants will be told that there are three different types of acupuncture provided in this study. Participants in different groups will be separated into cubicles to refrain from communication. Outcome assessors and statistical analysts will be blind to the procedure and results of randomization, group allocation, and intervention.

Sample size

According to our previous study, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of GSD patients decreased by 2.4 points after acupuncture and by 0.85 points after non-acupoint acupuncture. In this study, we anticipate a reduction of NRS score by 2.4 points after acupuncture with GB34 or EX-LE6, and we anticipate a reduction by 0.85 points after acupuncture with non-acupoint. With α = 0.05, 1 β = 0.8, and a standard deviation of 2, we need at least 81 participants in total. Considering a 10% dropout, the sample size of 30 in each group, with a total of 90 participants, would be required in this trial. And 30 patients in each group have a stable statistical power for brain functional network analysis [39].

Interventions

Participants in all three groups received one acupuncture treatment. The acupoints used in the study include GB34 (used in group A) and EX-LE6 (used in group B). To explore the specific effects of acupoints of GB34 and EX-LE6 on GSD patients, a non-acupoint will be selected as the control. The non-acupoint (used in group C) is 1–2 cm lateral to Zusanli (ST36), which were selected in accordance with the findings of our previous studies [40] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Locations of acupoints and non-acupoint. GB34 (Yanglingquan), in the depression anterior and inferior to the head of the fibula. EX-LE6 (Dannang), on the superior lateral aspect of the lower leg, 2 cun directly below the depression anterior and inferior to the head of the fibula. Non-acupoint, 1–2 cm outside of Zusanli (ST36)

Acupuncture treatment will be delivered to participants by one trained, licensed acupuncturist with at least 3 years of clinical experience. The acupuncturist will be trained and tested before participating in this trial.

The GB34, EX-LE6, or the non-acupoint will be punctured unilaterally (on patients’ right leg). Disposable sterile filiform needles (0.25 × 40 mm, Huatuo, Suzhou, China) will be perpendicularly inserted into acupoints at a depth of 21–26 mm after skin disinfection using alcohol; then, the needle is twisted between 90 and 180° and lifted and thrusted in an even amplitude between 0.3 and 0.5 cm, with 60 times to 90 times per minute to induce deqi sensation (including soreness, numbness, distention, and heaviness). After the deqi sensation is attained, needles will be retained for 30 min. During the 30 min, the above procedures will be manipulated for 10–15 s every 10 min to maintain the deqi sensation. This study aims to explore the superiority of the GB34 and EX-LE6 to the non-acupoint, so patients in group C will undergo an acupuncture procedure similar to the patients in the other two groups, but no deqi is required during the needle manipulation.

Ethical consideration

During the acupuncture treatment, some other interventions, such as symptomatic relief or psychopharmacological medications, are usually not allowed to use. However, if participants experience discomforts that are difficult to tolerate, they would be treated immediately. Researchers should record all relevant information into the CRFs. Participants in group C can choose to receive acupuncture treatment or health consultation for free after completing this trial.

Outcome measurements

MRI data acquisition

MRI data will be acquired with a 3.0-T magnetic resonance scanner (GE 3.0 T MR750, Wauwatosa, WI, USA) with an eight-channel phase-array head coil at the MRI Center in the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.

Each subject will be scanned with a high-resolution structural image through a 3-dimensional T1-weighted sequence and blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) images with a Gradient-Recalled Echo-Planar Imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence. 3D anatomic image parameters are as follows: repetition time (TR) = 6 ms; echo time (TE) = 2 ms; flip angle = 12°; number of slices = 156; slice thickness = 1 mm; field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256mm2; data matrix = 256 × 256. BOLD-fMRI image parameters are 43 axial slices with a slice thickness of 3.2 mm, TR 2000 ms, TE 30 ms, flip angle 90°, FOV 220 × 220 mm2, and data matrix 64 × 64.

Before the MRI, subjects will be screened for contraindications and instructed to remove all magnetic and metal items. Foam padding is used to minimize head motion and earplugs dampened scanner noise. All subjects are in a supine position and keep awake during the entire scanning procedure.

fMRI paradigm

The fMRI paradigm used in this study involves two main conditions, which are viewing of high-fat food pictures and low-fat food pictures. It is meant to investigate the immediate effect of acupuncture on the brain response to fatty food and its association with patients’ behavior.

Food (picture)-cue task

Participants will complete the food (picture)-cue task in the MRI scanner twice: before and after 30-min acupuncture treatment. The visual food-cue task, previously validated for fMRI [41, 42], was performed with a block design (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The food picture stimulation paradigm during fMRI. The food-cue fMRI task runs 7 min 42 s for each participant. In the beginning of the paradigm, a 12-s pre-fixation “+” appears in the center of the screen to keep the participant’s attention. After the task is completed, a post-fixation “+” appears for 12 s to end the task. A total of 16 blocks (8 high- and 8 low-fat food blocks) will be programmed. In each block, six cue high-fat food pictures or low-fat food pictures will be presented pseudo-randomly. Each picture lasts for 2 s with 1-s interval. Each block costs 17 s, with 12-s interval to the next block. In the end of each block, subjects will be asked to rate on an 11-point Likert scale for 10s. When the rating is completed, the screen will become blank for 2 s and then a new block would begin to appear

Specifically, a total of 16 blocks (8 high- and 8 low-fat food blocks) will be programmed using the E-prime 3.0 software (Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). In each block, six cue high-fat food pictures (e.g., soy-braised pork, cream cake) or low-fat food pictures (e.g., apple, celery) will be presented pseudo-randomly. Each picture lasts for 2 s with 1-s interval. Each block costs 17 s, with 12-s interval to the next block. In the end of each block, subjects will be asked to rate “How strong is your desire to eat your favorite food shown before?” (range from −5 highly aversive to + 5 highly appealing) on an 11-point Likert scale for 10s, by pressing two buttons with their right index and middle fingers [43]. When the rating is completed, the screen will become blank for 2 s and then a new block would begin to appear. In the beginning of the paradigm, a 12-s pre-fixation “+” appears in the center of the screen to keep the participant’s attention. After the task is completed, a post-fixation “+” appears for 12 s to end the task. The food-cue fMRI task runs 7.7 min (462 s) for each participant. Participants lie supine in the scanner and viewed a screen through a mirror.

Pictures selected for the food-cue task

A total of 96 pictures are from various websites such as Burst (a free stock photo platform, https://burst.shopify.com). Forty-eight sweet/savory high-fat food pictures and 48 sweet/savory low-fat food pictures are selected. Pictures are processed using Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA), and the parameters are 800 × 600 resolution, 300 dpi, 4 × 3 aspect ratio [44].

An online questionnaire will be created and released by social media (https://www.wjx.cn) and 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients with gallstones outside the study would complete it. The questionnaire aimed to verify if the Chinese food pictures could be accurately recognized and habitually consumed and that they are correctly perceived in terms of the content of fat, calorie, and sweet/savory taste. The food pictures will be used in experiments only if they are considered adequate [45]. The specific evaluation process is presented in an additional file (Additional file 2).

Primary outcome measurement

The primary outcome will be measured by the NRS. NRS is a commonly used, validated, and reliable measure of the current self-reported pain intensity [46, 47]. NRS is a horizontal line with 10 segments, being labeled from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable). The NRS will be assessed at four timepoints: before and after the 1st task fMRI scan (before acupuncture), after acupuncture (before the 2nd task fMRI scan), and after the 2nd task fMRI scan.

Secondary outcome measurement

The needle sensation evaluation form will be asked to fill after receiving one acupuncture treatment. The form is based on the Chinese version of the modified Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (C-MASS) and its validity and reliability have been examined [48, 49].

Data management and monitoring

For this trial, relevant data, adverse events, and safety assessments will be documented in both paper and electronic versions of CRFs. Each participant has a unique numeric identifier. Only outcome assessors have access to CRFs and do the double data entry. The Evidence-based Medicine Center of the Chengdu University of TCM will be in charge of supervising the study and monitoring data every 3 months.

Statistical analysis

Clinical data analysis

The clinical data will be statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp, Somers, New York). Skewed data distribution will be normalized. Means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be computed to describe continuous variables. Since only one session of acupuncture will be conducted in our study, the per-protocol (PP) analysis will be used, and the subjects with missing data will be excluded. The reasons for missing data should be recorded in detail.

Clinical outcome analysis

Comparison of NRS scores between four timepoints among three groups will be made using a repeated-measures ANOVA. Further, the planned contrast of changed NRS scores (before vs. after acupuncture; before vs. after fatty-food cues) will be conducted with a one-sided exact test for which p < 0.05 is considered significant.

In-scanner behavioral rating analysis

For the 11-Likert scale scores obtained during the task, we employ a 3 × 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA with the group (group A, group B, group C), timepoint (pre-acupuncture, post-acupuncture), and condition (high-fatty food pictures, low-fatty food pictures). Post hoc analyses will be conducted using Tukey post hoc or Bonferroni comparisons. And the post hoc significant differences (p < 0.05) will be followed up with t-tests. The data will be considered statistically significant with a level of 0.05.

Neuroimaging data analysis

All image preprocessing and general linear modeling will be done using SPM12 software (SPM12, Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, UK; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) performing on MATLAB 8.6 (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Data preprocessing will include the first 5 timepoints discarding for magnetic saturation effects, slice timing, head-motion correction, spatial normalization in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space resampled at 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm voxel size, filtering, and spatial smoothing using an 8-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel.

After preprocessing, the general linear model (GLM) will be used to model task-related effects. The inter-block interval serves as an implicit baseline. The two task conditions (high- and low-fat food), the 10-s 11-Likert scale rating period, and six head-motion parameters to control motion-related artifacts will be designed for the first-level design matrix. The following contrast (high-fat food cues > low-fat food cues), for each subject and for each session (before and after acupuncture treatment), will be then used for the second-level group analysis.

Furthermore, for correlation analyses, a Spearman correlation analysis will be performed to investigate a possible correlation between neural changes and clinical data.

Discussion

To explore the superior effect between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 on reliving GSD patients’ behavioral and neural response and the underlying central mechanism, the RCT is designed with a fatty-food-cue task to induce patients’ behavioral and neural reactivity. To our knowledge, this will be the first parallel, randomized study of acupuncture in combination with clinical questionnaire evaluations and task-fMRI among digestive diseases. The results are based on the NRS outcome and objective outcomes from the fMRI study, which may help provide more convincing evidence that immediate acupuncture is effective for alleviating pain and accompanied symptoms such as aversion to fatty food, vomiting, nausea, etc. for GSD patients.

The close relationship between acupoints and viscera is the basis of the bi-directional therapeutic effect of acupuncture for viscera disease [50]. In the theory of traditional Chinese medicine, the selection of the acupoint is crucial to the curative effect. Although many studies have demonstrated verum acupoint superior to non-acupoint in alleviating pain and suffering [51, 52], the acupoint specificity remains controversial. GB34 locates in the gallbladder meridian, which is particularly effective for gallbladder disease treatment. Moreover, it has been concluded that the hypothalamus-limbic system was significantly modulated by acupuncture at GB34 rather than at non-acupoint [53]. Hence, in comparison to the non-acupoint, this trial aims to firstly explore the superior effect between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 on GSD patients by observing their behavioral and neural response change to fatty-food cue and then to investigate the underlying central mechanism. This may have important implications for the effect of acupuncture in improving biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms.

On the condition of deficient motility of the biliary system with stones stuck in the gallbladder and cystic duct, bile acid transmission is blocked and the normal digestion of fat in the gastrointestinal system is affected [54]. Acupuncture, especially on the acupoint GB34, has been demonstrated not only for biliary colic relief, but also for having regulating effect on the biliary system [24,25,26,27,28]. However, the underlying central mechanism has never been investigated to date. Therefore, a fatty-food-cue task during an MRI scan is designed to induce pain and accompanied discomforts of GSD patients to investigate the immediate effect of acupuncture on the brain response and its association with patients’ behavior.

To improve the reliability and repeatability of study results, a strict quality control is indispensable. In this study, quality control will be strengthened focus on baseline consistency, strict task design, and fMRI scan, as well as the trained acupuncture manipulation. Participants will be screened strictly according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected food pictures are edited with a unified standard to ensure the identification and visual homogeneity. And prior to the food-cue task, these pictures would be evaluated using online questionnaires. All scans are performed by the same scanner and operator. The same experienced acupuncturists with standard operation procedure are in charge of acupuncture treatment. There are still some limitations that should be noted in this study. Firstly, the one-time acupuncture treatment may be insufficient to achieve a measurable response. Prolonged treatment periods should be considered in the future study. Secondly, as the unique nature of acupuncture and many patients in China are familiar with deqi sensation, it is impossible to completely blind all participants. Another limitation is that the primary and secondary outcome measures in this study are self-rating scale, where the outcome assessors may not be able to blind to group allocation and intervention.

In conclusion, the results of this study will allow to observe the superior effect between acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 on alleviating GSD patients’ symptoms. In addition, the potential central mechanism underlying acupuncture with GB34 and EX-LE6 will be further investigated.

Trial status

This trial was registered on 3 July 2020 (registration number: ChiCTR2000034432; version number: 2.1; version date: 1 January 2021). This trial is still recruiting patients now. This trial is currently in the stage of recruiting patients. The first participant was included on 26 August 2020. To date, 6 participants have been recruited. And the trial is expected to end on 10 December 2021.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. This is only a study protocol and as such no unpublished data are available.

Abbreviations

GSD:

Gallbladder stone disease

BC:

Biliary colic

CCK:

Cholecystokinin

GB34:

Yanglingquan

EX-LE6:

Dannang

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

SPIRIT:

The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials

EASL:

The European Association for the Study of the Liver

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

WBCs:

White blood cells

SAS:

The Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale

SDS:

The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale

CRFs:

Case report forms

ST34:

Zusanli

TR:

Repetition time

TE:

Echo time

FOV:

Field of view

BOLD:

Blood-oxygen-level dependent

GRE-EPI:

Gradient-Recalled Echo-Planar Imaging

NRS:

The Numeric Rating Scale

SF-12:

The 12-item Short Form Health Survey

SF-36:

The 36-item Short Form Survey

C-MASS:

Chinese version of modified Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale

CIs:

Confidence intervals

ANOVA:

One-way analysis of variance

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute

GLM:

General linear model

References

  1. Xing JJ, Zeng BY, Li J, Zhuang Y, Liang FR. Acupuncture point specificity. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;111:49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411545-3.00003-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao L, Chen J, Liu CZ, Li Y, Cai DJ, Tang Y, et al. A review of acupoint specificity research in china: status quo and prospects. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:543943.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao L, Li D, Zheng H, Chang X, Cui J, Wang R, et al. Acupuncture as adjunctive therapy for chronic stable angina: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1388–97. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao L, Chen J, Li Y, Sun X, Chang X, Zheng H, et al. The long-term effect of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(4):508–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Z, Liu Y, Xu H, He L, Chen Y, Fu L, et al. Effect of electroacupuncture on urinary leakage among women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2493–501. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Song G, Fiocchi C, Achkar JP. Acupuncture in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(7):1129–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo Y, Wei W, Chen JD. Effects and mechanisms of acupuncture and electroacupuncture for functional dyspepsia: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(19):2440–57. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i19.2440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tillisch K. Complementary and alternative medicine for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut. 2006;55(5):593–6.

  9. Jones C, Mawhinney A, Brown R. The true cost of gallstone disease. Ulster Med J. 2012;81(1):10–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Lund JL, Dellon ES, Williams JL, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(1):254–272.e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, et al. The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(9):2128–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012;6(2):172–87. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson CD. Upper abdominal pain: gallbladder. BMJ. 2001;323:316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):981–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loh WL, Ng NZP, Kabir T, Chan CY. Rare case of gallbladder mucocele causing gastric outlet obstruction treated with cholecystectomy. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;57:84–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Gallstones. BMJ. 2014;348(apr22 16):g2669. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamberts MP, Den Oudsten BL, Gerritsen JJ, et al. Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1402–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaunoo SS, Mohandas S, Almond LM. Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):15–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.10.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zackria R, Lopez RA. Postcholecystectomy Syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30969724/.

  20. World Health Organization. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials: World Health Organization; 2002. https://library.oum.edu.my/oumlib/content/catalog/619466.

  21. Jiang HF, Zhao C, Tang XF, Kong XC, Sha L, Yan L, et al. Clinical analgesic effect of acupuncture at GB34 (Yanglingquan) and EX-LE6 (Dannang) for biliary colic caused by acute cholecystitis. J Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg. 2016;28(6):481–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cao ZY, Zhang YB, Zhang HC, Zheng Y. Effects of electroacupuncturing at Yanglingquan on volume and arterial hemodynamics of gallbladder in chronic cholecystitis. Chin J Basic Med Tradit Chin Med. 2016;19(33):4092–5.

  23. Chen WH, Yu HW. Puncturing on Yanglingquan point for relieving of colic pain of bile cyst. Acupunct Res. 2000;01:62–3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim MH. A brief commentary: electroacupuncture may relax the contraction of sphincter of Oddi. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7(Suppl 1):S119–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SK, Kim MH, Kim HJ, Seo DS, Yoo KS, Joo YH, et al. Electroacupuncture may relax the sphincter of Oddi in humans. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(2):211–6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.112180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao J, Yu Y, Luo M, Li L, Rong P. Bi-directional regulation of acupuncture on extrahepatic biliary system: an approach in guinea pigs. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14482-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma C, Yang W. The preventing and treating effects of electro-acupuncture on cholelithiasis in golden hamster. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 1996;21(4):68–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou ML, Jia WR, Wang JT, Wang P, Guo LH, Sui MH. Effect of Electroacupuncture at “Yanglingquan” (GB 34) Acupoint on White Blood Cell Count and Gallbladder Wall Thickness in Rabbits with Acute Cholecystitis. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2015;40(3):233–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu L, Chen S, Zeng D, Li H, Shi C, Zhang L. Cerebral activation effects of acupuncture at Yanglinquan (GB34) point acquired using resting-state fMRI. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018;67:55–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ning Y, Li K, Fu C, Ren Y, Zhang Y, Liu H, et al. Enhanced functional connectivity between the bilateral primary motor cortices after acupuncture at Yanglingquan (GB34) in right-hemispheric subcortical stroke patients: a resting-state fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeo S, Lim S, Choe IH, Choi YG, Chung KC, Jahng GH, et al. Acupuncture stimulation on GB34 activates neural responses associated with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18(9):781–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00363.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Li K, Ren Y, Cui F, Xie Z, Shin JY, et al. Acupuncture modulates the functional connectivity of the default mode network in stroke patients. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:765413.

  33. Bruce AS, Bruce JM, Ness AR, Lepping RJ, Malley S, Hancock L, et al. A comparison of functional brain changes associated with surgical versus behavioral weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(2):337–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bruce JM, Hancock L, Bruce A, Lepping RJ, Martin L, Lundgren JD, et al. Changes in brain activation to food pictures after adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):602–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu Y, Ji G, Li G, Zhang W, Wang J, Lv G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves brain connectivity in obese patients. J Neurol. 2020;267(7):1931–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09780-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346(jan08 15):e7586. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Youping L, Taixiang W, White A, et al. Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med. 2010;7(6):e1000261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol. 2016;65(1):146–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005 Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Qiu K, Jing M, Sun R. The status of the quality control in acupuncture neuroimaging studies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:3685785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng F, Qin W, Ma T, Sun J, Tang Y, Yuan K, et al. Influence of acupuncture treatment on cerebral activity in functional dyspepsia patients and its relationship with efficacy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(8):1236–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCaffery JM, Haley AP, Sweet LH, Phelan S, Raynor HA, Del Parigi A, et al. Differential functional magnetic resonance imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(4):928–34. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.27924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Demos KE, Sweet LH, Hart CN, McCaffery JM, Williams SE, Mailloux KA, et al. The effects of experimental manipulation of sleep duration on neural response to food cues. Sleep. 2017;40(11):zsx125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Killgore WD, Young AD, Femia LA, Bogorodzki P, Rogowska J, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1381–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00191-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stoeckel LE, Cox JE, Cook EW 3rd, Weller RE. Motivational state modulates the hedonic value of food images differently in men and women. Appetite. 2007;48(2):139–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.07.079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carvalho-Ferreira JP, Finlayson G, da Cunha DT, Caldas G, Bandoni D, de Rosso VV. Adiposity and binge eating are related to liking and wanting for food in Brazil: a cultural adaptation of the Leeds food preference questionnaire. Appetite. 2019;133:174–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152(10):2399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kong J, Gollub R, Huang T, Polich G, Napadow V, Hui K, et al. Acupuncture de qi, from qualitative history to quantitative measurement. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(10):1059–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.0524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu DT, Jones AY, Pang MY. Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale: an exploratory and methodological study. Acupunct Med. 2012;30(3):214–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2012-010145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang WB, Wang YP, Li HY. Analysis on correlation between meridians and viscera in book The Yellow Emperor’s Internal Classic. Acupunct Res. 2018;43(7):424–9. https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.180185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu S, Yu L, Luo X, Wang M, Chen G, Zhang Q, et al. Manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture and usual care for prophylaxis of episodic migraine without aura: multicentre, randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2020;368:m697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. He Y, Guo X, May BH, Zhang AL, Liu Y, Lu C, et al. Clinical evidence for association of acupuncture and acupressure with improved cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019;6(2):271–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wu MT, Sheen JM, Chuang KH, Yang P, Chin SL, Tsai CY, et al. Neuronal specificity of acupuncture response: a fMRI study with electroacupuncture. Neuroimage. 2002;16(4):1028–37. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Berardino M, Di-Ciaula A, Vacca M, Baldassarre G, et al. Impaired gallbladder motility and delayed orocecal transit contribute to pigment gallstone and biliary sludge formation in β-thalassemia major adults. WJG. 2004;10(16):2383–90. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Dissemination policy

Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international meetings and conferences.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the Youth (NO. 81904096), the major program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81590950, 81590951), Special Project of “Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development” in Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2020ZYD046), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (NO. 2019 M653361), and Research Open Project of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (ZYX2018003). The funding bodies have no role in the design of the study and collection, in the analysis and interpretation of data, or in the writing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RRS, FRL, and NS participated in the conception and design of the trial. NS, YFZ, and JZ participated in drafting the manuscript. XYY, XDD, YZQ, WWZ, and JZ will be responsible for participant recruitment. NS will perform the acupuncture for participants. ZJL, SRC, and YFZ will be in charge of data collection. NS and RRS will conduct the data analysis. All authors discussed, read, and revised the manuscript, and all approved the publication of this protocol.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui-Rui Sun or Fan-Rong Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial has been approved by the institutional review boards and ethics committees of the 1st Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM with the ethical approval identifier 2019KL-029. This trial follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (Version Edinburgh 2000). All enrolled participants will sign an informed consent form. All researchers were trained and signed a pledge to protect the confidentiality of study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines.

Additional file 2.

Pictures selected for the food-cue task.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, N., Zhou, YF., Zhou, J. et al. The cerebral mechanism underlying the acupoints with specific effect for gallbladder stone disease: protocol for a randomized controlled task-fMRI trial. Trials 22, 399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05356-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05356-9

Keywords