Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Electroacupuncture for postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Trials volume 21, Article number: 163 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pain is common after nasal endoscopic surgery. It interferes with the quality of sleep and delays postoperative recovery. Acupuncture is an effective tool for pain management. However, electroacupuncture specifically for the relief of postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery has not yet been studied in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods/design

This randomized sham-controlled patient- and assessor-blind pilot trial has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in managing postoperative pain following nasal endoscopic surgery to treat sinusitis due to nasal polyps. Altogether, 30 participants will be randomly allocated to an electroacupuncture or non-invasive sham control in a 1:1 ratio. Treatment will occur within 2 h before the operation, immediately after the operation upon arrival in the recovery ward, and once daily for 3 days. The primary outcome is the pain numerical rating scale, which will be analyzed using the area under the curve. The secondary outcome measures include heart rate and blood pressure after the operation, sleep quality during the hospital stay (actigraph), quality of recovery, and the 36-item short form health survey. This trial will use an intention-to-treat analysis.

Discussion

This pilot randomized controlled trial will explore the feasibility of the further clinical application of electroacupuncture for the management of postoperative pain. It will inform the design of a further full-scale trial.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024183. Registered on 29 June 2019.

Peer Review reports

Background

Postoperative pain is an important symptom following nasal endoscopic surgery for sinusitis due to nasal polyps. Effective management of postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery is especially important for patient recovery. Pain due to a nasal filling may interfere with breathing, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction. According to previous reports, a failure to treat acute pain immediately may cause long-term chronic pain [1, 2]. The effective relief of acute pain is a challenge for patients and physicians following nasal endoscopy. Analgesic drugs, especially opioid analgesics, are often used to relieve pain after surgery. However, there are risks due to side effects, such as respiratory depression and drowsiness, which can lead to a delayed postoperative recovery. Thus, a safe and effective way to control postoperative pain and reduce recovery times needs to be identified.

Acupuncture has been widely used for pain relief, and its analgesic effects have been reported worldwide. Several studies have shown that acupuncture can relieve pain after surgery, including oral surgery [3, 4], cardiac surgery [5], laparoscopic cholecystectomy [6,7,8], gynecological surgery [9, 10], back surgery [11], and nasal surgery [12]. Therefore, acupuncture may relieve postoperative pain following nasal endoscopic surgery. Despite the positive results of these previously published studies, the results are not dependable due to issues such as small sample sizes, inadequate randomization, and lack of blinding. Therefore, high-quality evidence is needed to confirm the previous findings and for a protocol to be developed for the use of acupuncture for postoperative pain.

For those reasons, we designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using appropriate randomization, rigorous concealment of allocation, and blinding to examine the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) in relieving postoperative pain after nasal endoscopy. We aim to determine: (1) whether EA is useful for relieving postoperative pain after nasal endoscopy and (2) whether it can reduce postoperative recovery times. This study may provide high-quality evidence to support a standard protocol for the clinical application of EA for treating postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery.

We hypothesize that EA is effective, safe, and feasible for postoperative pain management after nasal endoscopic surgery.

Methods/design

Study design

This is a single-site patient- and assessor-blinded placebo-controlled pilot RCT. It will be carried out in Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the EA group or the sham electroacupuncture (SEA) group in a 1:1 allocation ratio. All patients must sign the informed consent form before being enrolled in the trial. A flowchart of the study process is detailed in Fig. 1. Additional file 1 contains the completed Spirit checklist.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart for this study. EA electroacupuncture, QoR-15 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale, SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey

Full size image

Sample size

This is a pilot study. In the relevant literature, there are no previous studies utilizing the same evaluation method as the primary outcome to compare a sham acupuncture control. Therefore, we were unable to calculate the statistical power formally. The appropriate sample size for a two-arm pilot study should be more than 12. We assumed a 20% dropout rate, so that we will recruit 15 participants into each group. We will, therefore, recruit a total of 30 individuals for this RCT [13,14,15].

Recruitment

Patients will be recruited to this RCT in Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Eligible subjects who have been scheduled for nasal endoscopic surgery for sinusitis due to nasal polyps will be invited to participate. They will be referred from an otorhinolaryngologist. A research assistant will screen them and obtain written informed consent. They will then be randomly allocated to either the EA group or the SEA group. The schedule of enrolment, intervention, and assessments is detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Schedule of enrolment, intervention, and assessments
Full size table

Inclusion criteria

Patients who meet all of the following criteria can be included:

  1. 1)

    American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to II

  2. 2)

    Eligible for nasal endoscopic surgery for sinusitis due to nasal polyps

  3. 3)

    Aged 18–60 years

  4. 4)

    Capable of understanding the trial and providing responses about the outcome measurement

  5. 5)

    Agree to participate in the survey and sign a written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:

  1. 1)

    Having chronic pain currently requiring treatment by an opioid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

  2. 2)

    Having a severe psychiatric disease or cognitive impairment and not able to understand the trial

  3. 3)

    Having hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV infection, or syphilis

  4. 4)

    Having a history of alcohol or drug abuse

  5. 5)

    Having any local or systemic infection

  6. 6)

    History of acupuncture treatment in the past 6 months

Randomization and allocation concealment

A random sequence will be produced by block randomization using the software SPSS version 23.0 by an independent research assistant. After the participants have completed the screening process and baseline assessment, they will be randomly assigned to one of the groups in a 1:1 ratio using random numbers in opaque envelopes. The treatment allocation codes will not be revealed before the first treatment. In an effort to minimize breaks in coding, the principal investigator who designed the trial and the research personnel who perform the outcome assessments will also be blinded to the treatment assignment.

Before the beginning of treatment, we will tell the participants that they have the same probability of being assigned to the EA group or the SEA group. To ensure that participants remain blinded, they will wear an eye mask during treatment. Only the acupuncturist who performs the treatment will know the group allocation at the time of treatment. The principal investigator, the data analysts, the outcome assessors, and statistician will remain blinded.

Quality control

The assessors and acupuncturists will be trained before the trial by the principal investigator (SX) to ensure the quality of this trial. This training covers inclusion and exclusion criteria, location of the acupoints, and the depth of needling. We will perform the EA procedure following the guidance for the clinical practice of acupuncture [16]. The acupuncturists must be registered, have a master’s degree, and have at least 3 years of experience in practicing acupuncture. In addition, data management, collecting outcome measures, and the statistical analysis will be completed by three independent researchers.

Intervention protocol

All participants will be asked to fast from 8 h before the operation. They will undergo a standard operative procedure and receive postoperative treatment. Participants will be transferred to the ward within 30 min after the operation. EA or SEA will be given within 2 h prior to the surgery, immediately after surgery on arrival in the recovery ward, and daily following surgery for 3 days (five treatment sessions in total). If a participant drops out before completing the study, the reason will be recorded.

The acupuncture methods are described in Table 2. In each treatment session, the patients will be in a private area and placed in the supine position. They will wear an eye mask to prevent them from observing the treatment procedure. The researcher will sterilize the patient’s skin with 75% alcohol wipes before treatment. Each treatment session will last for 30 min. When the needles are removed, the researcher will use a clean piece of cotton wool to prevent bleeding by compressing the points. In the first treatment, 11 acupoints will be used and 17 acupoints will be used in the subsequent postoperative treatments. The acupoints and rationale are summarized in Table 3.

Table 2 Treatment methods of electroacupuncture and acupoints
Full size table
Table 3 Acupoint selection and rationale based on traditional Chinese medicine
Full size table

The electroacupuncture group

The sterile disposable acupuncture needles are made of standard stainless steel (0.25 × 40 mm and 0.30 × 40 mm; Jia Jian, China). In all sessions, patients will receive treatment at 11 standard acupuncture points: bilateral hegu (LI4), neiguan (PC6), shenmen (HT7), yingxiang (LI20), zusanli (ST36), and shangxing (GV23). The postoperative treatment will be the same as the preoperative EA treatment, except that we will add the following six points: baihui (GV20), yintang (GV29), anmian (EX-HN22), and sanyinjiao (SP6). All acupoints were selected according to the acupuncture textbook of the International Standard Library of Chinese Medicine written by Zhang, Zhao, and Lao [17], the literature, and our clinical experience. The acupoints will be located with reference to the textbook. First the researcher will manipulate the needle manually until the patient reports needling sensations (de-qi sensation). An electric stimulator (HANS-200B) will be connected to three pairs of needles (LI4–ST36 bilaterally and GV20–GV23) to deliver a continuous wave-type low-frequency (2 Hz) current of 2 mA.

Control group

In the control group, Streitberger placebo needles, a sham acupuncture device that has been widely reported and validated, will be used [18]. The non-invasive sham needles will be positioned 1.5 cun lateral and posterior to the true acupoints [19, 20]. The blunt tip of the sham needles will touch the surface of the skin but will not penetrate it. The electric stimulator (HANS-200B) will be beside the patients and three pairs of electrodes will be connected to LI4–ST36 (bilaterally) and GV20–GV23 for 30 min but no electrical current will be delivered.

Outcome measures

The participant’s recovery will be monitored during and after the operation. The primary outcome is postoperative pain scores measured using a NRS. The secondary outcomes include heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) after the operation, sleep quality during the hospital stay (actigraphy), quality of recovery, and overall health. In addition, the exact type of operation and when EA or SEA treatment is given will be recorded for analysis. If the participants cannot be managed according to the protocol for any reason, including side effects, no further data will be collected. The assessment schedule is detailed in Table 1.

Primary outcome

NRS is a commonly used scale for assessing clinical pain. It is easier for patients to grade pain intensity with numbers rather than other measurements like the visual analog scale. The NRS is an 11-point scale for pain, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain. NRS pain scores will be assessed hourly for 6 h after surgery, then daily for 3 days [21, 22].

Heart rate and blood pressure

HR and BP will be monitored during and after the operation. These vital signs have been extensively utilized and validated. HR and BP will be assessed hourly for 6 h after surgery, then daily for 3 days.

Sleep quality

An actigraph device measures sleep quality when worn on the wrist overnight. The main sleep indexes are sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and sleep awakenings. Sleep condition and sleep quality will be analyzed using the software ActiLife6 (Version 6.8.1, Actigraph LLC) [23]. Sleep quality will be assessed five times: the night before the operation, the night after the operation, and three subsequent nights until discharge.

Quality of recovery

The 15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) is a valid, extensive, and efficient evaluation of a patient’s postoperative recovery. The QoR-15 measures five aspects of recovery: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. The questionnaire consists of 15 items with a score from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing pain always present. The sum of the scores is the patient’s QoR-15 score [24]. QoR-15 will be assessed twice: after surgery and on the day of discharge.

Overall health

The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items in eight multi-item scales (physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health) and one single-item scale (health transition). Higher scores represent better health status [25]. SF-36 will be assessed twice: after surgery and on the day of discharge.

Safety assessment

Before signing the informed consent form, participants will be told about the potential adverse events related to acupuncture, such as bruises, hematomas, infection, and pain. Adverse events will be graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe or medically significant). Any adverse events that occur during the trial will be recorded by the patients and doctors. Vital signs will be assessed at the time of the event, including HR, BP, and respiratory rate. All details of adverse events will be reported in a case report form. If any severe adverse event occurs, we will terminate the EA or SEA treatment and the Clinical Research Center for Drugs of the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine will unblind the participant to determine whether the serious adverse event is related to EA or SEA. A final decision will made on whether to continue the study. We will analyze the influence of all events at the end of the trial.

Credibility of Treatment Rating Scale

We will use the Credibility of Treatment Rating Scale to assess, from the participants’ viewpoint, the credibility of the acupuncture treatments [26, 27]. This scale has four items: (1) the perceived logic of the treatment, (2) whether they would recommend the treatment to their friends who have similar complaints, (3) whether they believe that the treatment will alleviate their complaint, and (4) whether they believe that the treatment will alleviate other complaints.

Blinding success assessment

Once the final treatment has been completed, we will test the success of blinding by asking the participants the following question: “When you volunteered for the study, you were informed that you had equal odds of receiving traditional electroacupuncture or electroacupuncture-like treatment. Now that our study is complete, which type of treatment do you think you received?” Three choices will be provided for participants: EA group, SEA group, and uncertain. If participants do not choose “uncertain,” we will ask them why they made their choice [3].

Monitoring

To ensure the quality of this trial, the whole process will be supervised by a qualified clinical trial expert. The trial will be carried out by Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The Clinical Research Center for Drugs of the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine will monitor the data, including interim results. If any problems are identified, the center may decide to change this protocol. Any such changes will be announced to all persons involved in the trial in writing after they have been approved by the relevant ethics committee. In addition, a qualified clinical trial expert will monitor this study. The principal investigator will take full responsibility for the conduct of the trial and will make the final decision on any changes required.

Data management

The clinical trial management platform ResMan will be used to manage the original data, which will be collected by blinded assessors and double-entered. The data management system will be tested beforehand, and relevant users will be trained on it before it is officially launched. The database will be protected by passwords. The original data for a participant will be entered within 1 week after their discharge from hospital. If there are issues with the data, the data supervisor will request clarification from a researcher. The clinical supervisor will monitor the work of the clinical trial center at least once a month.

Statistical analysis

An independent statistician blinded to group allocation will perform the statistical analyses using the statistical software SPSS 23.0 for Windows. The analyses will include an intention-to-treat analysis incorporating data from any participants who have dropped out of the trial. We will use multiple imputation for missing data. All demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects (such as sex, age, and weight) will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. We will identify the homogeneity of demographic characteristics and study variables between the two groups. Continuous variables will be reported as means ± standard deviations whereas qualitative data will be presented as frequencies and percentages. To analyze the primary outcome, the area under the curve of the NRS pain scores will be calculated using the trapezoidal method. Comparisons between groups will be made using Student’s t-test. The secondary outcomes—BP, HR, QoR-15, SF-36, and actigraphy assessments (total sleep time, sleep awakenings, and sleep efficiency)—will be compared between the two groups with Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All reported p values will be two-sided, and p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Discussion

Postoperative pain is common after nasal endoscopic surgery. It can interfere with the quality of sleep and delay postoperative recovery. It is also a significant burden on individuals. We chose to study acupuncture because previous studies have shown that it is an effective and safe method of pain management [11, 28,29,30]. If postoperative pain is not treated immediately, patients can develop long-term chronic pain. However, EA specifically for the relief of postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery has not yet been studied through a RCT.

This study will be conducted at the Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Acupuncture has already been used for inpatients. However, it has not been used for immediate analgesia for a surgical patient. This study is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy for relieving postoperative pain and discomfort. If this study confirms that acupuncture is effective and safe, acupuncture could be implemented as a new standard for relieving postoperative pain in Chinese and Western medicine.

There are several challenges and limitations in this study. Firstly, patients with different types of nasal disease will be screened to reduce variability within the study population. Therefore, only participants who need nasal endoscopic surgery for sinusitis due to nasal polyps will be included. In addition, randomization will be done rigorously so that the number of participants in the two groups is balanced. Secondly, the preoperative EA or SEA treatment must be carried out in the recovery ward within 2 h before the operation. We found many studies in which the acupuncture was performed before the induction of anesthesia in the operating theater [6, 31, 32]. However, the surgical team were concerned that this would lengthen the pre-surgical preparation time. Therefore, the timing of the preoperative treatment may not be ideal. Thirdly, it is difficult to schedule the acupuncture treatment because the surgery time is uncertain. An acupuncturist must wait until the surgery has ended so that they can immediately perform the postoperative treatment. Fourthly, because of the nature of clinical trials of acupuncture, it is inevitable that the acupuncturist is aware of treatment allocation. However, the acupuncturists will not be involved in assessing patients or the analysis. To prevent an acupuncturist from accidentally revealing the group allocation, their interactions with the patients will be limited. All patients will wear an eye mask while receiving treatment, which will occur in a private area. Overall, blinding will be strictly enforced.

Though there are many difficulties, we will strive to standardize the steps of the study to ensure its quality. We hope this pilot RCT will provide clinical evidence for the feasibility of EA in alleviating postoperative pain. The outcomes will inform the design of a further full-scale trial.

Trial status

The first investigators’ meeting took place on 31 May 2019. The RCT is in preparation now and will launch on 1 May 2020. Recruitment is expected to end in late 2020.

Availability of data and materials

The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific papers and in posters or oral presentations in conferences. All data and the protocol will be available 3 months after our publication of the results for a period of 3 years. The trial data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BP:

Blood pressure

EA:

Electroacupuncture

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HR:

Heart rate

NRS:

Numerical rating scale

QoR-15:

15-item Quality of Recovery Scale

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SEA:

Sham electroacupuncture

SF-36:

36-item Short Form Health Survey

References

  1. Eisenach JC, Brennan TJ. Pain after surgery. Pain. 2018;159(6):1010–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman CR, Vierck CJ. The Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Chronic Pain: An Integrative Overview of Research on Mechanisms. J Pain. 2017;18(4):359 e351–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lao L, Bergman S, Hamilton GR, Langenberg P, Berman B. Evaluation of acupuncture for pain control after oral surgery: a placebo-controlled trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(5):567–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bausell RB, Lao L, Bergman S, Lee WL, Berman BM. Is acupuncture analgesia an expectancy effect? Preliminary evidence based on participants' perceived assignments in two placebo-controlled trials. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(1):9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coura LE, Manoel CH, Poffo R, Bedin A, Westphal GA. Randomised, controlled study of preoperative electroacupuncture for postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. Acupunct Med. 2011;29(1):16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu GJ, Fu GQ, Li FR, Li LH, Guo F, Xue H, He K, Wang J. Efficacy on analgesia with electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2014;34:169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erden V, Yildiz AS, Guler C, Aydin N, Hamzaoglu N, Delatioglu H, Tozan E, Torlak F. Postoperative analgesic effect of acupuncture in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Agri. 2015;27(3):155–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ding YH, Gu CY, Shen LR, Wu LS, Shi Z, Chen YL. Effects of acupuncture combined general anesthesia on endorphin and hemodynamics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients in the perioperative phase. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2013;33:761–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng XM, Li J. Effect of electroacupuncture combined epidural anesthesia on plasma concentration of IL-1beta in patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2013;33:611–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang XH, Wu XL, Jin PL, Wang LD, Zhao ZE, Qin XY, Zhang ZY, Hu XZ, Cai ZL. Observation on analgesia effect of electroacupuncture during gynecologic outpatient operation. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012;32:909–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho YH, Kim CK, Heo KH, Lee MS, Ha IH, Son DW, Choi BK, Song GS, Shin BC. Acupuncture for acute postoperative pain after back surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Pract. 2015;15(3):279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahmeddini MA, Farbood A, Ghafaripuor S. Electro-Acupuncture for Pain Relief After Nasal Septoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(1):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4(4):287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;70(3):394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moon YK, Kim MH, Nam HJ. Comparison of the effectiveness between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture on tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Witt CM. Clinical research on acupuncture - Concepts and guidance on efficacy and effectiveness research. Chin J Integr Med. 2011;17(3):166–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang JZB, Lao L. Acupuncture and moxibustion (International Standard Library of Chinese Medicine). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. Lancet. 1998;352:364–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang X-G, Li Y, Tian X-P, Liang F-R. Comments on Selection of Non-acupoints beyond Meridians in Studies of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. J Tradit Chin Med. 2010;30(4):309–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu D, Gao Y, Chang J, Kong J. Placebo acupuncture devices: considerations for acupuncture research. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:628907.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered Numerical Rating Scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;10:390–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S240–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin X, Gou M, Xu J, Dong B, Yin P, Masquelin F, Wu J, Lao L, Xu S. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment on primary insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep Med. 2017;37:193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score The QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(6):1332–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, Gandek B. Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31(2):73–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C V. Credibility assessment in trials of acupuncture. Complement Med Res. 1990;4:8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun Y, Gan TJ, Dubose JW, Habib AS, Fleckenstein J. Acupuncture and Related Techniques for Postoperative Pain: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur. 2008;51(4):54–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Asher GN, Jonas DE, Coeytaux RR, Reilly AC, Loh YL, Motsinger-Reif AA, Winham SJ. Auriculotherapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(10):1097–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Usichenko TI, Lehmann C, Ernst E, Streitberger K. Auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur. 2009;52(2):52–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sim CK, Xu PC, Pua HL, Zhang G, Lee TL. Effects of electroacupuncture on intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement. Acupunct Med. 2002;20:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jia Q, Shi JH, Liu ZS, Gao YQ, Xie SH, Sun SC. Randomized controlled study on electroacupuncture compound anesthesia in radiofrequency ablation for hypertrophic inferior turbinate. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2011;31(3):543–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Zonya Christine Crossno and Dr. Philippa Hazlewood from the International Education College, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, for their editorial support.

Funding

This work is supported by the Chinese Medicine Research Fund Project of the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (grant 20184Y0143). The funding body has no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shanshan Li and Qing Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, China

    Shanshan Li, Xuan Yin, Hongyu Yue & Shifen Xu

  2. Shanghai Jingan District Zhabei Central Hospital, Shanghai, 200070, China

    Qing Zhang

  3. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China

    Wei Zhang

  4. School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Lixing Lao & Zhangjin Zhang

  5. Virginia University of Integrative Medicine, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA

    Lixing Lao

  6. Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China

    Huangan Wu

Authors
  1. Shanshan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuan Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongyu Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lixing Lao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhangjin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huangan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shifen Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SX, HW, and LL designed and developed the trial. SL drafted the manuscript. SL and QZ carefully revised and edited the protocol. XY, HY, and ZZ contributed to discussions about the trial. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huangan Wu or Shifen Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This RCT was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine on 6 June 2019 (certificate number 2019SHL-KY-15). The latest version of this protocol is 1.1, dated 10 May 2019.

The purpose, procedures, and potential risks of the RCT will be explained clearly to the participants. Each participant must give their written informed consent to a research assistant before joining the RCT.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

SPIRIT 2013 checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Zhang, Q., Yin, X. et al. Electroacupuncture for postoperative pain after nasal endoscopic surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials 21, 163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4064-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4064-2

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215