Skip to main content

Efficacy of dexamethasone treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial

Abstract

Background

There are no specific generally accepted therapies for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The full spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from asymptomatic disease to mild respiratory tract illness to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multisystem organ failure, and death. The efficacy of corticosteroids in viral ARDS remains unknown. We postulated that adjunctive treatment of established ARDS caused by COVID-19 with intravenous dexamethasone might change the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response and thereby reduce morbidity, leading to a decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation and in mortality.

Methods/design

This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel, open-label, superiority trial testing dexamethasone in 200 mechanically ventilated adult patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS caused by confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Established ARDS is defined as maintaining a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg on PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O and FiO2 ≥ 0.5 after 12 ± 3 h of routine intensive care. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either dexamethasone plus standard intensive care or standard intensive care alone. Patients in the dexamethasone group will receive an intravenous dose of 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10. The primary outcome is 60-day mortality. The secondary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days, defined as days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at day 28 after randomization. All analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion

This study will assess the role of dexamethasone in patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04325061. Registered on 25 March 2020 as DEXA-COVID19.

Peer Review reports

Background

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a catastrophic illness of multifactorial etiology characterized by diffuse, severe inflammation of the lung leading to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) [1]. There is a strong association between dysregulated systemic and pulmonary inflammation and progression or delayed resolution of ARDS [2]. Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated downregulation of systemic and pulmonary inflammation is essential to accelerate disease resolution and restore tissue homeostasis and can be enhanced with glucocorticoid treatment [3].

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly saturated intensive care units (ICUs). Severe pneumonia is the main condition leading to ARDS requiring weeks of MV with high mortality (40–60%) in COVID-19 patients. There is no specific therapy for COVID-19, although patients are receiving drugs that are already approved for treating other diseases [4]. There has been great interest in the role of corticosteroids to attenuate the pulmonary and systemic damage in ARDS patients because of their potent anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties [5]. However, the efficacy of corticosteroids in viral ARDS remains controversial [6, 7], and its role in COVID-19 is unknown.

Villar et al. [8] recently published a clinical trial enrolling 277 patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS who received either low-to-moderate doses of dexamethasone for 10 days or usual care [8]. The study demonstrated that corticosteroid therapy is associated with a sizable reduction in duration of MV and hospital mortality, in accordance with a previous meta-analysis [3]. The dysregulated inflammation and coagulation observed in COVID-19 [9] is similar to multifactorial ARDS and thus may be amenable to corticosteroid treatment to downregulate inflammation-fibroproliferation and accelerate disease resolution [2, 10]. In a recent report in 84 COVID-19 patients with ARDS from a single center in Wuhan, China, the administration of corticosteroids appeared to reduce risk of death, but this study was a non-randomized retrospective analysis [4].

What likely kills COVID-19 patients is the dysregulated systemic inflammation. We postulate that treatment with dexamethasone in the early phase of established moderate-to-severe ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 changes the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response and thereby reduces mortality. If the trial is positive, it could have a large impact on patients with COVID-19 since the drug is cheap and widely available.

Methods/design

Justification of the study

Currently, there are no specific pharmacological therapies for COVID-19. There has been great interest in the role of corticosteroids to attenuate the pulmonary and systemic damage in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) because of their potent anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties [5]. Corticosteroids have been off-patent for greater than 20 years; they are cheap and globally equitable. Dexamethasone has potent anti-inflammatory effects and weak mineralocorticoid effects compared with other corticosteroids [11]. It is 20 to 30 times more potent than the naturally occurring hormone, cortisol, and four to five times more potent than prednisone [5]. In addition, dexamethasone has a long-lasting effect, allowing for a once-a-day regimen [11].

We justify the need of this study based on the positive results of a recent clinical trial, showing that dexamethasone for 10 days was able to reduce the duration of MV (between-group difference 5 days, 95% CI 2–8 days) and 60-day hospital mortality (between-group difference 15%, 95% CI 5–26%) in patients with ARDS from multiple causes [8], and on preliminary retrospective data demonstrating a decrease in mortality [4]. Our goal in this study is to examine the effects of dexamethasone on mortality and on ventilator-free days (VFDs) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19 who still meet ARDS criteria at 12 h after ARDS diagnosis despite routine intensive management.

Study design

The DEXA-COVID19 study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving 200 mechanically ventilated adult patients with ARDS caused by confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and admitted into a network of ICUs in teaching hospitals across Spain, and possibly more widely. Patients will be randomized and enrolled in Spain, and data will be collected in Spain and analyzed in Spain and Canada. Study sites are listed in Appendix 1.

The trial was designed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [12], the Convention of the European Council related to human rights and biomedicine, and within the requirements established by Spanish legislation in the field of biomedical research, the protection of personal data, and bioethics, which was registered on 25 March 2020 at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with identification no. NCT 04325061. The study protocol (Version 1, 27 March 2020) was approved by the referral Ethics Committee (Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain) and the institutional review boards of all participating hospitals (Additional file 1). The trial was approved by the Spanish Agency of Drugs and Medical Devices (Agencia Española del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios) as a clinical randomized study with drugs on 30 March 2020. For inclusion into the study, approval on a written informed consent will be requested by the local investigators from the patients’ relatives or legal representatives (Additional file 2). Our protocol followed the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines [13]. See Additional file 3 for the SPIRIT checklist of the study protocol.

Study population

To be eligible for inclusion into this study (day 0), each patient (male or female) must fulfill the following inclusion criteria during screening and prior to enrollment: age ≥ 18 years, have a positive reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 in a respiratory tract sample, be intubated and mechanically ventilated, and have acute onset of moderate-to-severe ARDS, as defined by Berlin criteria [14], which includes (i) having pneumonia, (ii) bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest imaging (x-ray or CT scan), (iii) absence of left atrial hypertension or no clinical signs of left heart failure, and (iv) hypoxemia, as defined by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤ 200 mmHg on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of ≥ 5 cmH2O, regardless of FiO2. Patients will be excluded from study participation if any of the following are present: routine treatment with corticosteroids during the previous week (irrespective of dose), having a known contraindication to corticosteroids, a decision by a physician stating that involvement in the trial is not in the patient’s best interest, pregnancy and breast-feeding, or participation in another trial.

Enrollment into the study

Onset of ARDS is defined as the day and time when the patient first met moderate-to-severe ARDS criteria [14]. An enrichment strategy to decrease heterogeneity and to restrict enrollment to screened patients at higher risk of death, thereby allowing the use of mortality as a primary outcome, is used as follows. We will identify patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS by a two-step process: (i) mandatory standardization of measurements of PaO2/FiO2 at 12 ± 3 h after the ARDS diagnosis using a standardized ventilatory setting [8, 15], on PEEP of ≥ 10 cmH2O and FiO2 of ≥ 0.5 because the cutoff value of PaO2/FiO2 is an important determinant for ARDS stratification, and oxygenation in COVID-19 pneumonia/ARDS improves in many patients after initial inclusion criteria with low-tidal volume MV, moderate to high levels of PEEP, and prone positioning [10]; (ii) only patients with a PaO2/FiO2 of ≤ 200 mmHg under these ventilatory settings are eligible for randomization.

Randomization and masking

Eligible, consented patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dexamethasone plus standard intensive care or standard intensive care alone (control group). Dexamethasone will be freely provided by the health authorities in participating hospitals. Because of the emergency nature of the trial, a placebo will not be used. According to the ethical principles for medical research of the Declaration of Helsinki [12], the use of no placebo (no intervention) is acceptable when no proven intervention exists. The Spanish Agency of Drugs and Medical Devices and the Ethics Committees did not mandate a blinded design or the administration of a placebo. Central randomization will be done within the REDCap system. Local investigators in participating ICUs are the only authorized personnel to interact with the web-response system through a username and password. Once eligibility is confirmed in the eCRF, the next available treatment group is assigned by the system according to a randomization schedule prepared by a statistician and uploaded as a look-up table to the REDCap system. The computer-generated randomization schedule will use random permuted blocks of varying sizes to further ensure allocation concealment and is unavailable to those who enroll patients or assign interventions.

Dexamethasone therapy and general procedures

Patients assigned to the dexamethasone group will receive the first dose immediately after being randomized. Patients in the dexamethasone group will receive an intravenous dose of 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, and 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10. We selected the same doses as reported in the only published trial with dexamethasone in ARDS patients [8]. Treatment with dexamethasone will be given for a maximum of 10 days after randomization, independently of the intubation status (Fig. 1). Criteria for discontinuing intervention (exiting the trial) for a given trial participant are contemplated in the informed consent from (at patient’s legal representative request). In addition, as a request by the patient’s legal representative, allocated intervention (daily dose of intravenous dexamethasone) could be modified in case of a profound worsening of disease status (request to do-not-resuscitate orders, withdrawal of treatment and life support measures).

Fig. 1
figure1

Study design diagram

Although initially, the local investigator will assign the patient to the interventions, staff physicians and nurses will be involved in the management and treatment of enrolled patients until ICU discharge, respecting the treatment assignment during the study period. In both groups, standard intensive care will not be strictly controlled. However, in both treatment groups, physicians are asked to follow recommendations for standard intensive care management, including vasopressor support and antibiotic therapy, aimed at maintaining optimal conditions. For ventilatory management, clinicians should follow recommendations for lung-protective MV in both treatment groups: tidal volume of 4–8 ml/kg predicted body weight, plateau pressure < 30 cmH2O, respiratory rate to maintain PaCO2 between 35 and 50 mmHg, and with PEEP and FiO2 combinations according to the PEEP-FiO2 table of the ARDSnet protocol [16], ensuring that among the PEEP and FiO2 combinations, clinicians should use the PEEP levels that allow the reduction of FiO2 to the lowest level for maintaining a PaO2 of 60 to 100 mmHg or an SpO2 of 90–98% [17]. Neuromuscular blocking agents, sedation, prone positioning, and recruitment maneuvers are allowed at the discretion of the attending physician. Weaning from MV will start when the attending physician considers it clinically appropriate. In both groups, patients should be assessed daily for readiness to wean using a spontaneous breathing trial based on the ARDSnet protocol [16]. If the patient passes the trial, a decision for extubation is taken, unless there is a specific reason not to extubate. The use of drugs that are approved for treating other diseases, such as antivirals, interferon, chloroquine, or other medications, is allowed in both groups at the discretion of attending physician.

Clinical and laboratory monitoring

All participating patients, regardless of the study arm into which they are randomized, will be monitored and managed following general standard of care practices. Patients will be assessed once daily by trained physicians and nurses using a simplified standardized case report form (CRF) that captures data on lung mechanics, gas-exchange, and routine biochemistry and hematological test on days 0 (at ARDS diagnosis), 1, 3, 6, and 10, and every 10 days, including the last day of MV, if the patient is still in the ICU (Fig. 2). The model of CRF can be obtained from the primary investigator. Recommended lab determinations include creatine phosphokinase (CPK), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), troponin, lactate, creatinine, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocyte count, and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Viral serology (antibodies) and routine blood cultures will be indicated at the discretion of the attending physician. We will record complications, such as other infections, barotrauma, and sepsis; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score [18] on days 0 and 1; and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [19], on days 0, 1, 3, 6, and the last day of MV, if the patient is still in the ICU. Serial oropharyngeal swab samples will be obtained on day 1 (before the administration of the first dose of dexamethasone) and (if possible) on days 6, 10, 14, 21, and 28 until discharge or death occurs, and tested at participating hospitals using real-time RT-PCR. RNA will be extracted using standard measures by trained personnel from the Microbiology Departments in each hospital. Sampling should not stop if a swab at a given time is negative. We will also monitor duration of MV and ICU and hospital mortality. Patients will be followed up to 60 days after randomization. Data recorded on CRFs will be double-entered into an electronic database and validated by trial staff.

Fig. 2
figure2

Schedule of events. *Data will be collected if patients are still in the Intensive Care Unit. MV, mechanical ventilation; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score

Outcome measures

The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 60 days after randomization. Site investigators will be reporting patient status at 60 days, irrespective of whether the patient continued hospitalized in the same hospital, in another type of health care facility, or discharged home. If patients are discharged alive from hospital before day 60, the information on clinical status at 60 days will be obtained from the electronic clinical record. The Public Health Care System in Spain provides information about the clinical status of any patient through the electronic clinical record system that exists in any public hospital, city, province, or region. In the few cases in which no information could be not obtained from the electronic clinical record (e.g., the patient is not in contact with the outpatient clinic or home care professionals), the local investigator will contact the patient or relatives by phone to ensure the status of the patient at day 60 after randomization. In addition, lead investigators in each site will confirm the recorded 60-day mortality at the time of data analysis.

The secondary outcome is the number of VFDs at 28 days, defined as the number of days alive and free of MV from the day of randomization (day 1) to day 28 after enrollment, on which a patient breathe without assistance. For a day to be considered a ventilator-free day, the patient must breathe without assistance for the full 24 h, i.e., for every breath during that day. The following considerations will be taken into account when calculating the number of VFDs: (i) successful liberation from MV should last more than 48 h without reintubation in patients who survive 28 days after randomization; (ii) extubation only count from the last successful extubation within a 28-day survivor; and (iii) VFDs are awarded zero days if the patient is ventilated for 28 days or more, or die before 28 days (irrespective of intubation status) [20]. Other clinical outcomes include mortality in the ICU, mortality at day 28, duration of MV, length of stay in the hospital for survivors, and the time (in days) from treatment initiation to death. Virologic measures will include the proportions with viral RNA detection over time. Safety outcomes in both groups will include adverse events that occurred during treatment (hyperglycemia, new infections), serious adverse events, and premature discontinuation of treatment.

Sample size calculations

The trial was designed to be initiated in rapid response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. We estimated the sample size on the assumption that treatment with dexamethasone could reduce all-cause 60-day mortality by 20%. Our baseline reference was 50–55% based on recent observational studies from China [4]. Depending on the estimated 60-day mortality, we studied various group-size scenarios with cohorts of 93 to 100 patients in each arm to detect a 20% difference with a power of 80%, at a two-sided significance level of alpha = 0.05. The R function power.prop.test was used to estimate the sample size requirement which is based on a z test. A population size of 192 patients (96 in each arm) will provide 80% power to detect a 20% absolute reduction, from 55% on the control group to 35% in the experimental group. To account for up to 5% potential losses to follow-up, we will randomize 200 patients. We will only analyze patients that are enrolled and randomized to receive treatment. There will not be a formal interim analysis. However, after recruitment of 70% of the patients, an independent statistician will perform a conditional power analysis. If the conditional power at that time is ≥ 70% but < 80%, the external Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) can recommend an increase in sample size to achieve 80% power. The conditional power analysis will be performed at the Applied Health Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Since the conditional power analysis will not be used to stop the trial early due to a treatment difference, no adjustment to alpha is required. The DSMB could decide to stop the trial at any point for safety reasons. Also, in a context of a pandemic, it is plausible to discontinue the trial if no new patients are enrolled during a prolonged period of time. The decisions of the DSMB will be communicated to the principal investigators in a letter (sent by email). If the DSMB reaches a decision that the trial must be terminated early for safety reasons, they will email and call either one of the PIs within 24 h of making this decision.

Statistical analysis

Data will be collected in each participating ICU using a standardized form. Then, the data will be transmitted to the coordinating center whenever a patient dies or is discharged from the hospital. Before entering the data into a computerized database at the randomization center, a trained data collector will check the completeness and the quality of information. Logical checks will be performed for missing data and to find inconsistencies, especially regarding clinical diagnosis, date, and severity scores. If necessary, the data collector will contact the investigator by phone to validate the data or reformat the data for entry into the database. Automatic range and completeness checks are performed as data are entered into the database. All analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle without adjustment for multiple comparisons for the secondary outcomes since these are considered exploratory in nature. Baseline characteristics will be summarized descriptively, as appropriate (i.e., means (SD) or median and quartiles for continuous variables and counts/percentages for categorical/binary variables). Primary and secondary outcomes will be reported as observed between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and two-sided p values. The 60-day mortality will be compared using a chi-squared test, and the treatment effect will be expressed as a risk difference with 95% CI. The risk ratio and 95% confidence interval will also be computed. It is expected that the primary outcome will be ascertainable for everyone. Nevertheless, should missing outcomes be a problem, an inverse probability weighted analysis will be conducted. VFDs will be assessed with the Mann-Whitney U rank test. Since the nonparametric test works with ranks, it is usually not possible to get a CI with exactly 95% confidence. Thus, the 95% CI for the difference between medians for VFDs in both groups will be estimated using a bootstrap procedure (10,000 replications).

Other continuous outcome variables will be compared with the Student’s t test. The treatment effect will be expressed as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. For variables where there are major concerns about the underlying assumptions for the t test, the Mann-Whitney U rank test will also be used for a sensitivity analysis. Other categorical outcome variables will be compared using a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test if expected counts are < 5. The treatment effect will be expressed as a risk difference with 95% confidence interval as well as the risk ratio. The time to hospital discharge will be summarized with cumulative incidence curves, treating death as a competing risk and compared using a cause-specific Cox model, and the treatment effect will be expressed as a hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval. Two-sided testing will be used for all inferential comparisons. A p value of less than 0.05 will be considered to indicate statistical significance for the primary outcome. Given the controversies around significance testing, p values will always be accompanied by point estimates of treatment effect and 95% confidence intervals. Analyses will be done by an independent statistician who will be unaware of group assignment.

Trial organization

The steering committee is composed of the study principal investigators who contributed to its design and approved the final protocol (Appendix 2). The trial will be monitored by a DSMB. The DSMB can recommend to stop the trial because of safety concerns or recommend increasing the sample size to achieve 80% power based on a conditional power analysis. The DSMB will be composed of three external, independent experts in critical care medicine, mechanical ventilation, and ARDS, and a statistician (Appendix 2).

The study coordinator (JV) is responsible for promoting patient enrollment and complete follow-up, including a list of any outcome data to be collected from participants who discontinue or deviate from intervention protocols. The trial management team comprises the chief investigators, a project manager, a statistician, a clinical epidemiologist, and an investigator expert in clinical trials. The responsibilities of this team are as follows:

  1. (i)

    Planning and conducting the study: designing the protocol, designing the randomization process, case report forms, and managing and controlling the data quality

  2. (ii)

    Assisting centers with administrative submission process of completed CRF, providing randomization, taking actions to increase patient enrollment, auditing, and sending study materials to the research centers

  3. (iii)

    Regular communication with enrolling centers for solving question related to screening and enrollment

  4. (iv)

    Providing update of published literature related to COVID-19 ARDS

  5. (v)

    Monthly monitoring of enrolled patients by each center

  6. (vi)

    Monitoring patient’s follow-up

  7. (vii)

    Producing a by-monthly study newsletter (DEXA-COVID19-news)

  8. (viii)

    Programing an online research-in-progress meeting when half of planned sample size patients are enrolled

  9. (ix)

    Statistical analysis, research reporting, and helping in writing the final manuscript

Reporting adverse events

According to Spanish legislation, adverse events should be reported to the Trial Coordinator and to the referral Ethics Committee for review. All adverse events occurring during the study observed by the investigator will be recorded on the data forms. An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrences in a patient during the trial that are not considered related to the clinical state of the patient. Serious adverse events related to the protocol will be sent to the DSMB within 24 h after being received by the trial coordinator. Expected adverse events or complications related to the protocol would include occurrence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose > 180 mg/dL) and new infections (e.g., pneumonia or sepsis) after randomization. All unexpected, and related or possibly related, adverse events will be reported to the institutional review board. Adverse events considered related to the trial, as judged by the investigators, will be followed until resolution or until the event is considered stable. Related adverse events that result in a participant’s withdrawal from the study or are present at the end of the study will be followed up until a satisfactory resolution occurs. The investigator would seek information on adverse events by specific questioning and examination.

Discussion

This is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone in patients with established ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 and managed with a lung-protective ventilatory strategy, which includes the use of low tidal volume, application of moderate to high levels of PEEP, and limitation of the plateau pressures below 30 cmH2O.

Corticosteroids have been the most widely used medications for ARDS since the first clinical description of the syndrome [21]. However, the efficacy of corticosteroids in viral ARDS remains controversial [6, 7]. For a virus to survive and replicate in an organism, it must employ strategies to evade and misdirect the host’s immune response. There is compelling evidence that the primary immune-evasive strategy utilized by the coronavirus is to inhibit its host’s corticosteroid stress response [22]. This is accomplished by viral expression of amino acid sequences that are molecular mimics of the host’s adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). When the host produces antibodies against these viral antigens, the antibodies bind to the host’s own ACTH, which limits the host’s stress response by interfering with ACTH’s ability to stimulate the secretion of corticosteroids. Influenza and coronavirus-infected patients do not have increased cortisol levels [23]. Influenza and coronavirus are cytokine dysregulators [24, 25]. The virus induces the release of inflammatory cytokines, which disrupts the immune response and can lead to multisystem organ dysfunction, including ARDS. Treatment with corticosteroids can relieve the patient’s symptoms of adrenocortical insufficiency and increase corticosteroid levels. Corticosteroids appeared to improve the clinical condition of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), as reported in several studies [26, 27].

In a recent commentary on the use of corticosteroids in severe viral epidemics, the authors stated that there are “conclusive data” to expect that patients with COVID-19 ARDS will not benefit from corticosteroids [6]. This interpretation is without full evidence-based support [28]. First, their “conclusive” statement rested on only four small studies without including results from another 25 publications [28]. Second, they ignored the positive findings of two large studies showing a reduction in mortality in 401 patients with SARS [29] and 2141 patients with influenza H1N1 pneumonia [30]. Finally, they did not take into consideration the updated literature reported by a Task Force Panel from the US and European critical care societies, which provided a conditional recommendation (moderate certainty) for corticosteroid treatment in ARDS [3]. What is clear from the literature is that there is a wide divergence of opinion on whether corticosteroids should be used in patients with COVID-19.

There are major differences between our study and other randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of corticosteroids in patients with nonviral and viral ARDS. First, all the trials published before 2005 evaluated the use of steroids in patients treated with nonprotective MV [7, 8]. Second, none of the trials has used the same timing, dosage, and type of corticosteroids. Third, only one trial [8] has specifically evaluated the use of dexamethasone in ARDS. Fourth, none of the trials has consistently reassessed patients at 12 h after ARDS onset to ensure that only patients with early established ARDS were randomized. It has been shown that ARDS is characterized by an overwhelming pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response within 24–48 h resulting in exacerbated pulmonary inflammation and fibroproliferation [31]. Failure to repair tissue damage during the first 24–48 h results in an ongoing, self-perpetuating inflammation with subsequent loss of lung function and increased mortality. In our trial, we will ensure that all enrolled patients have established moderate-to-severe ARDS after 12 h of meeting the Berlin definition on standard ventilator settings.

Our study has potential limitations. First, a major limitation of our study is that it is not blinded and there is no placebo control group. However, most ICU drugs (such as dexamethasone) are administered by ICU nurses and not by physicians. Second, our study design will not allow us to conclude whether the administration of dexamethasone of different doses and for longer or shorter periods of time would have improved outcomes. Third, we powered this trial to detect a 20% risk difference, which we considered plausible in the absence of specific treatments with established efficacy in reducing mortality. We acknowledge that the minimal important difference in 60-day all-cause mortality is likely to be smaller, in the range of an absolute risk difference of 5%. However, this trial is meant as a rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic designed to identify large signals. The conditional power analysis allows an adaptation of the sample size if the power is < 80%, but ≥ 70%, the absence of a plan to stop early for overwhelming benefit or futility means that we will maximize the information obtained while keeping the trial feasible. If the effect size is around 20% on an absolute risk difference scale, then the trial will inform clinical practice immediately, and if the effect size is smaller, it will contribute meaningfully to meta-analyses of trials addressing a similar clinical question. The major strengths of our trial are the simplicity of the study design and the use of an enrichment strategy at 12 h after initial ARDS diagnosis for assessment of moderate-to-severe ARDS under a standardized ventilatory setting.

If our hypothesis is correct, it will be the first time that treatment with a well-known anti-inflammatory drug, such as dexamethasone, will decrease morbidity and mortality of patients with established ARDS caused by COVID-19. As well, if our hypothesis is correct, expected benefits for public health will include earlier liberation from MV, less probability of complications (extubation failure, multisystem organ failure), earlier discharge from the ICU, earlier discharge from the hospital, and marked reduction of health care costs.

Trial status

The first patient was enrolled on 3 April 2020. The expected duration of the study is 10 months (3 April 2020 to 3 February 2021).

Availability of data and materials

JV, ASS, PJ, RT, and KW will have full access to all data at the end of the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All data needed to evaluate the conclusions of the trial will be present and tabulated in the final manuscript. Individual de-identified raw data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request during the first year after publication of the primary manuscript arising from this study.

Abbreviations

APACHE II:

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CI:

Confidence interval

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CPK:

Creatine phosphokinase

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

PaCO2 :

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide

PaO2/FiO2 :

Ratio between partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and fraction of inspired oxygen

PBW:

Predicted body weight

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

SpO2 :

Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation

VFD:

Ventilator-free day

References

  1. 1.

    Villar J, Slutsky AS. GOLDEN anniversary of the acute respiratory distress syndrome: still much, work to do! Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Meduri GU, Annane D, Chrousos GP, Marik PE, Sinclair SE. Activation and regulation of systemic inflammation in ARDS: rationale for prolonged glucocorticoid therapy. Chest. 2009;136:1631–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, Arlt W, Balk RA, Beishuizen A, Briegel J, Carcillo J, Christ-Crain M, Cooper MS, Marik PE, Umberto Meduri G, Olsen KM, Rodgers SC, Russell JA, Van den Berghe G. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients (part 1): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:2078–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Du C, Zhang Y, Song J, Wang S, Chao Y, Yang Z, Xu J, Zhou X, Chen D, Xiong W, Xu L, Zhou F, Jiang J, Bai C, Zheng J, Song Y. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1–11.

  5. 5.

    Rhen T, Cidlowski JA. Anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids – new mechanisms for old drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1711–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020;395:473–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Villar J, Confalonieri M, Pastores SM, Meduri GU. Rationale for prolonged corticosteroid treatment in the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Expl. 2020;2:e0111.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Villar J, Ferrando C, Martinez D, Ambrós A, Muñoz T, Soler JA, Aguilar G, Alba F, González-Higueras E, Conesa LA, Martín-Rodríguez C, Díaz-Domínguez FJ, Serna-Grande P, Rivas R, Ferreres J, Belda J, Capilla L, Tallet A, Añón JM, Fernández RL, González-Martín JM. dexamethasone in ARDS network. Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:267–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bouadma L, Lescure FX, Lucet JC, Yazdanpanah Y, Timsit JF. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infections: practical considerations and management strategy for intensivists. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:579–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meijvis SC, Hardeman H, Remmelts HH, Heijligenberg R, Rijkers GT, van Velzen-Blad H, Voorn GP, van de Garde EM, Endeman H, Grutters JC, Bos WJ, Biesma DH. Dexamethasone and length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2023–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jeric K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Doré CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WSM, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin criteria. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Villar J, Pérez-Méndez L, López J, Belda J, Blanco J, Saralegui I, Suárez-Sipmann F, López J, Lubillo S, Kacmarek RM, HELP Network. An early PEEP/FiO2 trial identifies different degrees of lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:795–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Angus DC. Oxygen therapy for the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1054–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yehya N, Harhay MO, Curley MAQ, Schoenfeld DA, Reeder RW. Re-appraisal of ventilator-free days in critical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:828–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967;2:319–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wheatland R. Molecular mimicry of ACTH in SARS - implications for corticosteroid treatment and prophylaxis. Med Hypothesis. 2004;63:855–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jefferies WM, Turner JC, Lobo M, Gwaltney JM Jr. Low plasma levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone in patients with acute influenza. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:708–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cheung CY, Poon LL, Lau AS, Luk W, Lau YL, Shortridge KF, Gordon S, Guan Y, Peiris JS. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease? Lancet. 2002;360:1831–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, Tai Y, Bai C, Gao T, Song J, Xia P, Dong J, Zhao J, Wang FS. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:420–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Peiris JS, Chu CM, Cheng VC, Chan KS, Hung IF, Poon LL, Law KI, Tang BS, Hon TY, Chan CS, Chan KH, Ng JS, Zheng BJ, Ng WL, Lai RW, Guan Y, Yuen KY, HKU/UCH SARS Study Group. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet. 2003;261:1767–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhao Z, Zhang F, Xu M, Huang K, Zhong W, Cai W, Yin Z, Huang S, Deng Z, Wei M, Xiong J, Hawkey PM. Description and clinical treatment of an early outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangzhou, PR China. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:715–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shang L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Du R, Cao B. On the use of corticosteroids for 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Lancet. 2020;395:683–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen RC, Tang XP, Tan SY, Liang BL, Wan ZY, Fang JQ, Zhong N. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with glucosteroids: the Guangzhou experience. Chest. 2006;129:1441–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li H, Yang SG, Gu L, Zhang Y, Yan XX, Liang ZA, Zhang W, Jia HY, Chen W, Liu M, Yu KJ, Xue CX, Hu K, Zou Q, Li LJ, Cao B, Wang C, National Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Clinical Investigation Group of China. Effect of low-to-moderate-dose corticosteroids on mortality of hospitalized adolescents and adults with influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 viral pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017;11:345–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Burnham EL, Janssen WJ, Riches DW, Moss M, Downey GP. The fibroproliferative response in acute respiratory distress syndrome: mechanisms and clinical significance. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This investigator-initiated, academic, non-industry sponsored trial was funded by academic grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (CB06/06/1088, PI19/00141); Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; and the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Ottawa, Canada (Grants FDN143285, OV3-170344). Centers enrolling patients were the legal sponsors for the study in their own hospitals. Dexamethasone was provided free of cost by the Pharmacy Departments of all participating hospitals, with no obligation to blind the study nor to prepare any form of placebo. All researchers are independent of the funding bodies. None of the clinical investigators received any honorarium for participating in the trial. Study funding agencies have no role in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the report for publication and no authority over any of these activities.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

JV and AAS contributed to the initial study concept and design. JV, JMA, CF, GM, TM, JF, AM, CA, FSS, PJ, KW, RT, and ASS contributed to the final study design, participated in its coordination, and drafted the manuscript. JV and ASS obtained funding for the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Villar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the referral ethics committee (#5567 Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain) and the institutional review boards of all participating hospitals (Additional file 1). For inclusion into the study, and due to national emergency regulations, verbal informed consent from the patient’s relatives or legal representative will be provided (Additional file 2). See Additional file 3 for the SPIRIT checklist of the study protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Approval of the referral ethics committee (according to the Spanish legislation #RD 1090/2015, this approval is mandatory for all participating centers).

Additional file 2.

Informed consent form.

Additional file 3.

SPIRIT checklist.

Appendices

Appendix 1

DEXA-COVID19 Network investigators (in alphabetic order by hospitals)

Carlos Ferrando, Ricard Mellado-Artigas, Javier Fernández, María Hernández, Manuel Castellá, Pedro Castro, Joan Ramón Badia (Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain); Gerardo Aguilar, José A. Carbonell, Rafael Badenes, Carlos Tornero, José Ferreres, María L. Blasco, Nieves Carbonell, Ainhoa Serrano, Mar Juan (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain); José I. Gómez-Herreras, Mario Lorenzo López (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain); Alfonso Ambrós, Carmen Martín, Rafael del Campo (Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain); Jaume Puig-Bernabeu, Carolina Ferrer, José de Andrés (Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain); Tomás Muñoz, Pablo Serna-Grande, Gonzalo Tamayo, Alberto Martínez-Ruíz, Iñaki Bilbao-Villasante (Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain); Jesús Villar, Rosa L. Fernández (Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain); César Pérez Calvo, Ánxela Vidal (Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain); José M. Añón, Juan Carlos Figueira, María José Asensio, Emilio Maseda (Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain); Fernando Suárez-Sipmann, Fernando Ramasco (Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain); Marina Varela-Durán, Pilar Díaz-Parada (Hospital Universitario Montecelo, Pontevedra, Spain); Josep Trenado-Álvarez, María M. Fernández (Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain); César Aldecoa, Jesús Rico-Feijoo, Lorena Fernández, Jesús Sánchez-Ballesteros, Pablo Blanco-Schweizer (Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain); Domingo Martínez, Juan A. Soler (Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain); Arthur S. Slutsky, Peter Jüni, Kevin E. Thorpe, Rekha Thomas, Kosma Wysocki, Pamela de Verno, Gurpreet Lakhanpal, Clara Juando-Prats (Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada).

Appendix 2

Steering committee: Jesús Villar, José M. Añón, Carlos Ferrando, Gerardo Aguilar, Peter Jüni, Arthur S. Slutsky.

Data and safety monitoring board: Chairperson: Peter Suter (University of Geneva, Switzerland); Massimo Antonelli (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy); Paolo Pelosi (Hospital San Martino Policlinico, Genoa, Italy); a statistician (to be nominated in due time).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villar, J., Añón, J.M., Ferrando, C. et al. Efficacy of dexamethasone treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial. Trials 21, 717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04643-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Coronavirus disease 19
  • COVID-19
  • Dexamethasone
  • Corticosteroids
  • Lung protective ventilation
  • Acute respiratory failure