Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Point OutWords: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motor skills intervention to promote communicative development in non-verbal children with autism



Point OutWords is a caregiver-delivered, iPad-assisted intervention for non-verbal or minimally verbal children with autism. It aims to develop prerequisite skills for communication such as manual and oral motor skills, sequencing, and symbolic representation. This feasibility trial aims to determine the viability of evaluating the clinical efficacy of Point OutWords.


We aim to recruit 46 non-verbal or minimally verbal children with autism and their families, approximately 23 per arm. Children in the intervention group will use Point OutWords for half an hour, five times a week, for 8 weeks. Children in the control group will have equal caregiver-led contact time with the iPad using a selection of control apps (e.g. sensory apps, drawing apps). Communication, motor, and daily living skills are assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Parents will keep diaries during the intervention period and will take part in focus groups when the intervention is completed.


Point OutWords was developed in collaboration with children with autism and their caregivers, to provide an intervention for a subgroup of autism that has been historically underserved. As autism is a heterogeneous condition, it is unlikely that one style of intervention will address all aspects of its symptomatology; the motor skills approach of Point OutWords can complement other therapies that address core autistic symptoms of social cognition and communication more directly. The current feasibility trial can inform the selection of outcome measures and design for future full-scale randomised controlled trials of Point OutWords and of other early interventions in autism.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN12808402. Prospectively registered on 12 March 2019.

Peer Review reports


Designing and testing interventions targeting communication skills in children with autism has proven difficult given its heterogeneous presentation and the lack of measures sensitive to change over time [1], yet substantive progress has taken place in recent years [2,3,4]. Applied behaviour analysis (ABA) [5] is effective but not routinely provided in most jurisdictions as its labour-intensive nature presents an economic barrier. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines [6] recommend a combination of social skills groups, occupational therapy and speech/communication therapy, with most children receiving just 6–8 sessions. The most successful treatment studies have targeted children’s socially engaged imitation [7] or parents’ evocation of children’s communicative behaviours, producing long-term social communicative improvements [8, 9] but often at significant economic cost [10] and without effectiveness for all children. The Early Start Denver Model intervention combines principles of ABA with adult responsivity and sensitivity to child cues, and has demonstrated effectiveness [11], although the only domain of improvement replicated across studies is language, and not developmental quotient, autism severity, or adaptive behaviour [12]. Alternative or complementary approaches to autism therapy are the several unproven, uncontrolled and in many circumstances invalid parent-delivered methods of manual motor symbolic communication [13, 14]. These demand extensive training for those who implement them, are labour-intensive, and can be difficult to subject to controlled testing [15]. Our novel intervention trains manual motor skills and symbolic representation and is facilitated by our freely downloadable iPad app, Point OutWords™ [16], yielding light caregiver training - just 30 min by a research assistant with a 4-page instruction booklet. Built into Point OutWords are automated measures of motor performance, and of any caregiver-initiated movements of the device that might cue particular responses.

Our research and that of others has demonstrated strong association between language delay and motor dysfunction in a significant subgroup of autism [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. In our own clinical sample, fully one third of autistic children who lack communicative speech manifest a distinctive pattern in which motor and particularly oral motor skills are impaired whilst expressive language is impaired disproportionately to more intact receptive language [19] - the inverse of the more general pattern of receptive impairment in autism [24]. Our work suggests that the high-level deficits in social communication so overtly characteristic of autism may emerge developmentally from interaction of lower-level, more subtle, more fundamental traits in three general areas: social motivation and reward, cognitive and motor control, and sensory perception [25], and thus implies that early training directed towards such lower-level skills - in the case of this new intervention, motor control and sequencing - might exert a positive knock-on effect on the development of communicative skills. This approach aims to develop social communicative skills by training non-social, domain-general prerequisite skills [26] - implementing what is in a sense a “back door” route to autism therapy.

Children with autism who are non-verbal or minimally verbal are often excluded from research [27], and children with severe communication impairments are less likely to be included in treatment studies [28]. Point OutWords was developed with the inclusion of clients with autism both explicitly by asking children to choose amongst graphical design options and by obtaining therapists’ feedback on their behalf, and implicitly by observing children’s preferences. Point OutWords was designed with the strengths of autistic cognition in mind. Many children with autism excel at detail-oriented tasks such as jigsaws due to their abnormally strong ability to perceive local details. Whereas many teaching and learning strategies adapted from methods for non-autistic people end up working against autistic cognition by asking people with autism to do what they cannot easily do, Point OutWords works with autistic cognition, by beginning from this point of strength [29]. Indeed, our pilot study (N = 7) [30] indicated that children and parents enjoyed using Point OutWords.

The current trial will evaluate the feasibility of testing the Point OutWords intervention, focusing on usability and engagement, fidelity to treatment, and recruitment and retention for a future full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT). It will assess variance in test-retest measures, informing the selection of suitable outcome measures sensitive to change and determining the target sample size of a large-scale randomised controlled trial, key steps in designing RCTs for autism interventions [3, 29].


Our primary aim is to determine whether the clinical efficacy of Point OutWords as an intervention for enhancing communication and interaction in minimally verbal or non-verbal children with autism can be feasibly evaluated. Feasibility will be assessed based on the outcomes as follows:

  1. 1.

    Intervention fidelity and acceptability - Establishing whether Point OutWords can be delivered by parents based on frequency, duration, and content of intervention sessions, in addition to parents’ understanding of the intervention and proficiency in delivering it; assaying whether the intervention is accepted by children and how the intervention fits into the family routine.

  2. 2.

    Recruitment and retention - establishing whether sufficient participants can complete a future full-scale trial based on participation rates, drop-out, and completion rates; determining whether sufficient participants match inclusion criteria, including impairment in motor skills and expressive language.

  3. 3.

    Outcome measure efficacy - assessing whether candidate measures of motor and communicative function, alongside measures of individual and family social function, are acceptable and sensitive test-retest measures in the target population; ascertaining variance in outcome measures will inform the sample size of a future RCT.

Positive outcomes from this feasibility study would lead to a subsequent full-scale RCT. Point OutWords carries potential for substantial economic benefit in the UK National Health Service (NHS) and other settings because it is designed for use by caregivers with minimal training.



The study applies a feasibility, parallel-groups, randomised controlled design, in which participants are randomly allocated to the intervention group or the control group at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be stratified by gender given the uneven gender ratio in autism diagnoses. The intervention period will last 8 weeks. Figure 1 shows assessments to be administered at baseline and immediately post-intervention. This trial protocol is in line with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 (see SPIRIT Checklist in Additional file 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) figure with timeline for recruitment, assessments, and interventions. Schedule of assessments: MSEL Mullen Scales of Early Learning, BOSCC Brief Observation of Social Communication Change, DCMA Dyadic Communication Measure for Autism, BPVS-3 British Picture Vocabulary Scale, SRS-2 Social Responsiveness Scale, VMPAC Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children, PSI-4 Parenting Stress Index, VABS-2 Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, FQoLS Family Quality of Life Scale, AIM Autism Impact Measure. Blue lines indicate the intervention group and black lines indicate the control group

Study setting

The intervention will take place within the homes of participants in the Peterborough area. Psychometric testing will be administered at the family home, the child’s school, or at the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) Integrated Children’s Service based in the City Care Centre, Peterborough, UK, depending on the preference of the children and their families.



Participants will be recruited through CPFT Integrated Children’s Services and through community paediatric services in nearby NHS trusts. Parents or caregivers will be approached by known and trusted clinicians, a strategy shown to heighten recruitment rates [31]. Parents will receive a recruitment invitation letter followed by an information sheet for the study. In addition to talking to their child’s consultant, parents will have the opportunity to talk to a research assistant over the phone or via email to ask questions.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are:

  • Ages 3–15 years.

  • Autism diagnosis confirmed by multidisciplinary assessment as part of routine NHS clinical care, and meeting criteria for autism on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOS-G) [32].

  • Nonverbal or minimally verbal (lacking communicative speech or speaking fewer than 100 single words and no phrase speech).

  • Clinical judgement of motor impairment.

  • Clinical judgement that age-adjusted receptive language surpasses age-adjusted expressive language.

  • English is the primary language spoken in the home (as Point OutWords is not yet translated).

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria are:

  • Severe visual or hearing impairment (which would affect interaction with an iPad).

  • Caregiver does not speak English and therefore would not be able to administer the intervention.

  • Severe impairment of motor function (e.g. cerebral palsy).

Sample size

We aim to recruit 46 families (approximately 23 per arm). Another RCT of a similar population [9] recruited 62.8% of (152 of 242) families assessed for eligibility. A target of 46 families would let us estimate a recruitment rate of 62.8% within a 95% confidence interval of ±14%. In the unlikely event of falling far short of that norm, then we would recommend modifications to the recruitment strategy.

Allocation and blinding

Individuals will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Participants will be block-randomised, stratified by gender, by the web-based randomisation service Sealed Envelope™ [33], overseen by a trial statistician uninvolved in data collection. Upon obtaining written consent, a research assistant will access Sealed Envelope™ to obtain the treatment allocation, and will therefore be aware of each participant’s allocation, but will be blind to the time point of psychometric assessments at the data analysis stage. Due to the nature of the intervention participants cannot assuredly be blinded to treatment, as they will be aware of the app they are using. The rest of the research team, including the principal investigator and clinical lead, will be blinded to the allocation of each family.


Point OutWords [30] is an iPad game developed to train fine motor and cognitive skills in children with autism. Participants in the experimental group will receive the Point OutWords intervention, with a target of at least 20 h of contact time, as an adjunct to standard NHS clinical therapy. The intervention will be administered by parents/caregivers in the home, either on a loaned iPad or on the family’s own iPad if preferred. Parents will receive training from the research team to use Point OutWords, and written instructions.

Point OutWords has three modes of increasing difficulty, which tap skills prerequisite to language and communication. Learning starts in the Point mode where the child uses their finger to drag jigsaw pieces to complete a picture. The object is segmented into jigsaw puzzle pieces, which are scattered round the touchscreen. Puzzles are images from daily life e.g. bath, shampoo. The child has the opportunity to develop the manual motor skills prerequisite to pointing to interact with a touchscreen. The touchscreen software interface is adapted so as to accommodate the autistic user’s open-loop style of visuomotor control and is customisable to meet the child’s motor ability.

From here, the child progresses to Type mode. In Type mode, puzzle pieces cannot be dragged into place in an iconic style of reference, but instead must be cued by symbolic reference: Each puzzle piece is labelled with a letter in the word, there are as many puzzle pieces as there are letters in the word, and in order to cause a piece to snap into place within the puzzle, the participant must press the corresponding letter key on a virtual keyboard that appears on the touchscreen. The Type mode aims to encourage symbolic representation, with which non-verbal children with autism show difficulty [34] and which underpins communication development [35]. In addition to improving motor skills, Point OutWords teaches sequencing through piecing several parts of a puzzle together. Cognitive sequencing underlies language development along with planning for social interaction and daily activities [26].

Finally, in the Speak mode the child assembles each jigsaw piece by speaking each syllable of a word in order, allowing the child to practise their oral motor skills. The object is segmented into a number of puzzle pieces equal to the number of syllables in the word. Each syllable is modelled, the client is prompted to speak each one, and OpenEARS speech recognition software is used to detect these pronunciations. Speaking a syllable causes the corresponding puzzle piece to snap into place. Tolerance for articulation errors and other slight inaccuracies of the match between actual and modelled pronunciations can be configured by the caregiver. Advancing to Speak mode will be difficult for the majority of children in this non-verbal/minimally verbal sample; we expect that most children will stop with Type mode.

Point OutWords is intended to be used with a parent or other caregiver who can support the child in an “errorless learning” format, filling in responses and correcting errors when the child is unable to do so independently, and redirecting the child towards the task when attention wanders. Progressing to a more difficult level is at the discretion of the caregiver in interaction with the child.

Control group

Participants not receiving the experimental intervention receive standard NHS clinical therapy and equal iPad contact time using a selection of iPad apps, which include Magic Fluid Lite [36], Heat Pad - Relaxing Heat Sensitive Surface! [37], Draw with Stars! Play With Shooting Stars [38], Baby Drum [39], Doodle Buddy Paint Draw App [40], Aquarium Live HD [41], and Dogs [42]. Control apps were chosen based on their absence of skill promotion, particularly in areas Point OutWords aims to enhance, such as sequencing, assembling puzzles, vocabulary learning, fine motor skills training, social learning, or skills that underpin language development (e.g. category learning). The control group will receive equal regular support during the study period, and will be offered Point OutWords intervention after the end of the study.

Adherence monitoring

Participants will have fortnightly contact with the research team via telephone calls to monitor fidelity to assigned intervention, and address queries related to the intervention or using the app(s). During telephone calls, consent for continuing participation is taken or, on the participant’s request, the intervention is stopped. iPad data logged during sessions will be used to monitor session frequency, session length, and games played. Participants will be asked to keep a diary during the intervention period, which includes questions related to frequency of iPad sessions, when during the day iPad sessions take place, and the types of games played. Phone calls and diaries will also record what other interventions, if any, the child or parents are taking part in.


Primary outcomes

Child observations

Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)

The MSEL [43] is widely used as a measure of cognitive ability, motor ability, and language skills in research and clinical evaluations of children with autism [44, 45]. Relevant to the study, the fine motor, receptive language, and expressive language subscales will be administered. Each subscale yields developmental age equivalents, and therefore is applicable to developmentally delayed children outside the 68-month normed age range [46]. The MSEL shows good test-retest and inter-rater reliability [43] and strong concurrent validity with other developmental tests of motor and language, including the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales II (VABS-II) [44]. Differences in mean scores from baseline to post-intervention between the intervention and control group will measure treatment efficacy. Separately, baseline mean scores will be used to characterise for whom the treatment is (or might be) effective. For example, a disparity in age-equivalent scores between the receptive and expressive language domain might predict treatment effects.

Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC)

The BOSCC [47] is scored from a 12-min video recording of a parent-child play session, coded on 16 items assessing atypicality, frequency, and severity of autistic symptoms. The BOSCC coding scheme was developed from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)-2 [48] by the same research team, to detect clinically significant changes in autistic symptoms following treatment. The BOSCC has yielded excellent inter-rater reliability and high test-retest reliability [47]. Treatment efficacy will be measured by differences in mean scores from baseline to post-intervention between the intervention and control groups.

Dyadic Communication Measure for Autism (DCMA)

The DCMA [8] is coded from the same parent-child play session as the BOSCC, to assess dyadic communicative interaction between parent and child, making it largely complementary to the behaviours scored by the BOSCC. Independent codes are applied to instances of the parent’s synchronous responses with the child, the child’s initiations with the parent, and the time spent in shared attention. The mean change from baseline to post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

British Picture Vocabulary Scale III (BPVS-III)

The BPVS [49] provides a rapid measure of receptive vocabulary, tested via the same method - nonverbal pointing - that Point OutWords applies in its Point Mode (and builds on in Type Mode). Inclusion of this measure thus aims to assess both vocabulary itself and the ability to express vocabulary through pointing. The mean change from baseline to post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Parent reports

Social Responsiveness Scale II (SRS-2)

The SRS [50] assesses social communicative competence from 2.5 years onwards. Comprising 65 items, the SRS-2 is sensitive to behavioural change and widely used as an autism treatment outcome measure [51, 52]. Mean scores taken at baseline and post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and the control groups.

Feasibility and acceptability measures

Internal iPad data

Pseudonymised activity logs will be uploaded from the iPad. A time series of all stimuli and responses, number of completed puzzles, and total and average session length will be logged.

‘Think-aloud’ sessions

An optional session in which parents are recorded voicing their thoughts and experiences whilst using Point OutWords, the individual “think-aloud” session will be completed before the intervention period begins.

Focus groups

An optional group interview will be held after participation in the study, for the intervention and control groups separately. Each interview group will comprise four to six parents/caregivers. The first part will be a group think-aloud session during which caregivers voice their thoughts and experiences whilst using Point OutWords, facilitated by a team comprising the research assistants who have worked with caregivers and their children, an autism parent member of the research team who is not a participant in the study, and an expert on qualitative data collection. Think-aloud methodology can provide a valid source of data on participants’ thinking [53]. The second part will be a group discussion, without the research assistants present, addressing the software, families’ experiences using it, and how it fits into their daily family routine.

Clinician interviews

Semi-structured interviews will take place post-intervention with four referring clinicians. Questions will address their views on the intervention and on recommending it to parents.

Secondary outcomes

Child observations

Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children (VMPAC)

The VMPAC [54] assesses neuromotor integrity of the speech system and is standardised for ages 3–12 years [54]. Items are categorised into five subdomains: global motor control, focal oromotor control, sequencing, connected speech and language, and speech characteristics. The VMPAC is sensitive to change following speech or motor intervention [55, 56], and subtests have strong test-retest reliability (correlation .88–.90), inter-rater reliability (correlation .93–.99), and high validity [54]. It will be administered at baseline and post-intervention, and mean score differences will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Parent reports

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales II (VABS-2)

The VABS [57] is a widely-used parent interview measuring adaptive behaviour, recommended as a test-retest measure in autism treatment studies [58] and normed for all ages [59]. Items are categorised into four primary domains: communication, daily living skills, socialisation, and motor skills, with maladaptive behaviour (internalising and externalising) also examined. The VABS is administered at baseline and post-intervention; changes in mean scores across time between the intervention and control groups will be used to assess treatment efficacy. Similarly to our use of the MSEL, the baseline scores will characterise for whom the treatment is effective.

Parenting Stress Index IV (PSI-4)

The PSI [60] is a 120-item parent-report questionnaire assessing the extent of stress in the parent-child dyad, with foci on three core domains of stress: child characteristics, parent characteristics, and situational/demographic life stress. Mean differences in scores collected at baseline and post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Family Quality of Life Survey (FQoL)

The FQoL [61] is a 25-item parent-report questionnaire assessing perceived satisfaction in terms of quality of family life. Five domains are assessed: family interaction, parenting, emotional well-being, physical/material well-being, and disability-related support. Mean differences in scores collected at baseline and post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Autism Impact Measure (AIM)

The AIM [62] is a 25-item parent-report questionnaire that measures changes in core autism symptoms, and which has strong test-retest and cross-informant reliability [62]. Mean differences in scores collected at baseline and post-intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Internal iPad data

The iPad will record the child’s real-time finger movements when they are using Point OutWords, for the duration of the intervention period [30]. Changes in manual motor skills will be measured by the following parameters: (1) visuomotor targeting error is measured as the Euclidean (straight-line) distance between the initial point of contact with the screen and the nearest extent of the target puzzle piece, or the centre of the target key if in Type mode, (2) time of release and position of release relative to target are recorded, (3) motor efficiency is measured as variance of linear speed in the direction of motion, and variance of angular speed (the rate of change in direction of motion over time), (4) accuracy in movement will be measured as a ratio of the actual drag path to the shortest possible path length, and (5) the number of failed attempts to drag puzzle pieces and the overall time taken to successfully complete a piece are also recorded.

Other outcomes

Parental feedback, clinical and spoken language information

A structured parent-report questionnaire will be offered post-intervention, developed from the pilot study [30] to explore enjoyment of the app, engagement with other iPad or computer games, other therapies and to report languages used at home in addition to English (if any).


Participant eligibility will be assessed by the clinical lead, and staff under her direction. Research assistants will ascertain consent, allocate participants according to an independent randomisation procedure (, and administer assessments, including recording a 12-min video of child and parent in free play for later scoring with the DCMA and BOSCC. The Principal Investigator (PI) received formal training in DMCA and BOSCC coding, which he passed on to the research assistants. The research assistants are trained to a high standard in psychometric and qualitative administration and coding, and receive regular supervision from the PI, the clinical lead, and qualitative specialist. Members of the research team responsible for data collection have completed CPFT Good Clinical Practice training. Parents will receive training to deliver the intervention and will be asked to keep a diary. Parents will be asked to complete the optional think-aloud session and focus group.

Data management

Data will be anonymised and stored on a restricted shared drive in the CPFT network, to which only the research team will have access. Per the informed consent, anonymised data will be retained permanently (except in the case of withdrawal during the study) and may be released to other researchers. Identifying data (e.g. video, voice) will be deleted after scoring or transcription. Data entry will be completed and checked by research staff. Video data (for DCMA and BOSCC) and voice recordings (think-aloud, focus group, clinician interviews, and diaries) will be stored on a password-protected laptop computer at Nottingham Trent University. Physical data will be stored in locked cabinets within CPFT, accessible only by the research team. Internal data from Point OutWords will be pseudonymised and stored on a file server. The trial statistician and research team will undertake statistical analysis of the data. Only the clinical staff will have access to clinical records. As a small-scale feasibility study, this protocol does not include a data monitoring committee.

Statistical analysis plan

Results will be analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. Guidelines and standard practices for each outcome measure will be used to impute values for missing items in individual datasets. For example, guidelines for the SRS-2 recommend using the median of the items answered. Any systematically missing subscales within feasibility candidate measures will inform the decision as to which measures would be carried forward to a full-scale RCT. This feasibility trial aims to determine the sample size for the full RCT. Test-retest variances in internal iPad data and external outcome measures will be entered into a standard calculation of statistical power to inform the sample size of a full RCT. Participant flow in terms of recruitment and retention, reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for non-pharmacological interventions, will also inform the sample size for a large RCT. The trial statistician will perform the power and sample size calculations. Statistical analysis will be conducted in R.

We will explore the predictability of treatment effects based on the baseline measures. Findings may shed light on whether the intervention is more suited to certain profiles of autism than others. Inclusion criteria for a subsequent full trial would be fixed accordingly. Standardised scores from psychometric assessments will be analysed using mixed-model analysis of variance with time point (pre-intervention, post-intervention) as the within-subjects factor, and treatment (intervention, control) as the between-subjects factor. The internally logged outcome measures of visuomotor accuracy in Point OutWords will be analysed using three separate exploratory analyses of covariance, with Point OutWords usage time, number of distinct Point OutWords sessions, and real time as covariates. Participants’ own responses will be discriminated from caregivers’ model inputs by a statistical clustering method. Fidelity will be assayed using descriptive reports of content, and duration and number of intervention sessions completed.

Qualitative data and analysis

Data from parent diaries, focus groups and interviews will be transcribed and thematically analysed. A partially inductive and partially deductive (based on themes from our pilot study [30]) coding frame will be developed, using the analytical stages of Braun and Clarke [63]. Qualitative analysis will be evaluated using indicators of confidence and relevance [64] to ensure rigour, transparency, and accountability.

Video coding

Research assistants or others qualified for research scoring of the instruments in question will code the 12-min video recordings of parent and child play with the DCMA and the BOSCC coding frameworks. They will regularly co-rate the videos to maintain inter-rater reliability. To account for natural inter-rater differences, the same rater will code the pre and post scores, blind to the time point.


Point OutWords was developed in collaboration with children with autism and their therapists and caregivers [30], to include engaging jigsaws, high-contrast graphics, and exogenous cues to help capture and maintain attention, and customisable reinforcement prompts. The interface was adapted to accommodate open-loop visuomotor control (a visuomotor impairment common in people with autism), eliminating a major source of users’ frustration. Working from autistic cognitive strengths, Point OutWords aims to enhance motor skills and to promote representation of objects as sequences (of iconic puzzle pieces, symbolic letters, or symbolic sounds), prerequisite abilities that can support communicative development.

There is a need for therapies that address underserved subpopulations of autism and can be delivered with ease at a low cost. For children with autism who have motor impairment and greater receptive than expressive communication, our new intervention could fill this gap in services were it shown effective in a full-scale RCT. Before such a large-scale study can be framed, a feasibility trial is a necessary step to evaluate recruitment and retention rates and identify actions for reducing attrition. Feasibility trials are especially helpful if the proposed population, in this case, autism with motor impairment, has not previously been specifically tested [65]. Attrition poses a particular challenge with respect to the control group, but we hope that explaining the study’s contribution to science, regularly telephoning families to offer support, and offering the prospect of using Point OutWords after participation in the trial will motivate families to complete the study. As the acceptability of the control apps is a likely predictive factor in reducing attrition in the control group, with advice from parents of autistic children we have selected iPad apps that are enjoyable and fun for children and families. These control apps were selected based on the absence of Point OutWords skills and tasks, as the inadvertent involvement in similar therapy or training in a control group can confound results as recently reported in one large-scale trial [12].

Variance in outcome measures will be an outcome measure itself, used to inform on the suitability of certain psychometric assessments and the sample size in a full-scale RCT. The proportion of missing data in assessments will demonstrate which measures are acceptable to children and their caregivers. For example, in a previous study [19] children were not compliant with an oral motor assessment (Com DEALL Oro Motor Assessment [66]) possibly because of sensory sensitivities around the mouth. The last decade and a half of research on early intervention in autism has spurred the development of new measures sensitive to change from which the current trial benefits, such as the BOSCC [47] and the AIM [62]. Furthermore, we use a wide range of assessments to comprehensively ascertain the impact of the Point OutWords intervention, including measures of restricted and repetitive behaviour (BOSCC, SRS, AIM); some studies have found that improvement in communication skills can have a knock-on effect on the reduction of restricted/repetitive behaviours [9, 67]. Along the same lines, measuring an intervention’s outcomes, not just on autistic symptom severity but on individual and family well-being and daily functioning, has recently been underscored [68], so we include measures of parent stress (PSI), family quality of life (FQoL), and children’s challenging behaviour (maladaptive behaviour subdomain on VABS-2).

Qualitative data from diaries, interviews, and focus groups will help identify barriers to successful delivery of the intervention, allowing such issues to be resolved. The Point OutWords intervention is flexible therapy, not constrained to an environment or a time of day, which can be delivered when the child’s mood is most conducive to learning. Feedback about how Point OutWords slots into the daily family routine will be used to enhance the social validity of the intervention design.

As autism is a heterogeneous condition it is unlikely that one style of intervention will address all individuals, nor all aspects of its symptomatology within each individual. Our intervention for motor and communication skills facilitated by Point OutWords can complement other therapies that address communication and social skills more directly. Indeed, the answer will lie in cumulative effectiveness research and the use of common outcome measures across trials so that systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be easily conducted in the future [2]. The current trial prepares for this prospect, adopting measures such as the DCMA and BOSCC used in the PACT-G trial [69], and VABS-2 and the MSEL used in the Early Start Denver Model trial [12] and many other studies of autism. While the current trial is not sufficiently scoped to ascertain whether the Point OutWords intervention is effective in improving communication skills in children with autism, it can inform the design of larger RCTs, not only for Point OutWords but also for other early interventions in autism.

Trial status

NIHR protocol number: 40703; Recruitment began on 12 March 2019 and is expected to be completed by December 2019.


Trial Management Group and Patient Steering Committee

M.K. Belmonte (academic PI and overall project lead), E.J.L. Weisblatt (clinical PI), C. Días (parent co-investigator) and J. Foster (qualitative research specialist) will oversee the trial’s progress. The Trial Management Group will communicate amendments to testing or recruitment criteria to the rest of the research team. There are no interim analyses planned. In addition, we are setting up a Patient Steering Group comprising four parent representatives, which will convene quarterly. C. Días heads the Patient Steering Group and will report to the Trial Management Group.

Adverse Effects

Research staff will monitor participants for adverse effects, such as stress associated with the intervention, during fortnightly telephone calls with participants. One possible adverse effect might arise from overuse of the iPad, to a degree that could displace reciprocal social interaction between child and parent. To address this possibility, parents will be reminded that Point OutWords is a joint activity involving them and their child, not just the technology and their child. Safety reporting for adverse effects will be followed in line with CPFT Good Clinical Practice.


Trial conduct will be audited monthly by the PI and the clinical lead. In accordance with Good Clinical Practice, a site folder will be held at the City Care Centre within the CPFT Integrated Children’s Service, containing copies of correspondence with families, the protocol, and a delegation log specifying the responsibilities of research team members. Case report forms for each participant will be used to record personal information, treatment allocation, dates of assessments and iPad drop-off, and relevant information collected during telephone calls during the intervention period e.g. if the child was feeling sick. Recruitment data are uploaded monthly to the NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio by a research assistant so that CPFT can provide additional support if the trial falls behind schedule.


We aim to publish methodological lessons and quantitative and qualitative trial results in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Preliminary results would be presented at the 2020 annual meeting of the International Society for Autism Research. Our web site [16] will be updated to inform parents and clinicians of the trial findings. Findings will be reported at CPFT multidisciplinary meetings and at a meeting for individuals with autism, their families, teachers, and therapists. Findings will be added to our trial registration at ISRCTN. Per standard NIHR contractual terms, the trial’s funder will have authority over publication, such authority not to be unreasonably applied. CPFT as the Sponsor will not have authority over publication. Authorship is available to members of the project team, and on request to others who have referred patients (e.g. clinicians) or collected or analysed data (e.g. students). Each empirical publication will include a statement of author contributions. There will be no use of professional writers.

Trial Sponsor details

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust

Elizabeth House

Fulbourn Hospital


United Kingdom

CB21 5EF

Telephone: +44 1223 219400


Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed for this protocol study. Participant-level data will be available at a later date. Although no specific reuse of participants’ data in future studies is contemplated a priori, this possibility is allowed by the consent document except of course in instances where the parent has withdrawn their child’s data from the study: “By agreeing to participate in this study, you are giving us permission to release anonymous, non-identifying data to other researchers for their use in legitimate scientific research. These data may be posted on the World Wide Web for other scientists to download. At any time whilst the study remains ongoing – even after your child’s participation in the study may have ended – you may withdraw your consent, and in this case we would delete your data from the study dataset and from the set of anonymised data that we release in future.” No biological specimens will be collected for any outcomes.



Applied behaviour analysis


Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - Generic


Autism Impact Measure


Brief Observation of Social Communication Change


British Picture Vocabulary Scale III


Communication developmental eclectic approach to language learning


Consolidated standards of reporting trials


Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust


Family Quality of Life Survey


Mullen Scales of Early Learning


UK National Health Service


National Institute for Health and Care Excellence


National Institute of Health Research


Parenting Stress Index IV


Randomised controlled trial


Social Responsiveness Scale II


Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales II


Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children


  1. Spence SJ, Thurm A. Testing autism interventions: trials and tribulations. Lancet. 2010;9732(375):2124–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Charman T. Editorial: Trials and tribulations in early autism intervention research. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2019;58(9):846–8.

  3. Lord C, Wagner A, Rogers S, Szatmari P, Aman M, Charman T, et al. Challenges in evaluating psychosocial interventions for autistic spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005;35(6):695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green J, Garg S. Annual research review: The state of autism intervention science: progress, target psychological and biological mechanisms and future prospects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2018;59(4):424–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foxx RM. Applied behavior analysis treatment of autism: the state of the art. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2008;17(4):821–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Autism spectrum disorder in under 19s: support and management [CG170]. 2016. Available from: [Accessed 19 Mar 2019].

  7. Landa RJ, Holman KC, O’Neill AH, Stuart EA. Intervention targeting development of socially synchronous engagement in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(1):13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pickles A, Le Couteur A, Leadbitter K, Salomone E, Cole-Fletcher R, Tobin H, et al. Parent-mediated social communication therapy for young children with autism (PACT): long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2501–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Green J, Charman T, McConachie H, Aldred C, Slonims V, Howlin P, et al. Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9732):2152–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Byford S, Cary M, Barrett B, Aldred CR, Charman T, Howlin P, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a communication-focused therapy for pre-school children with autism: results from a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, Smith M, Winter J, Greenson J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1):17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers SJ, Estes A, Lord C, Munson J, Rocha M, Winter J, et al. A multisite randomized controlled two-phase trial of the Early Start Denver Model compared to treatment as usual. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2019;58(9):853–65.

  13. Chen GM, Yoder KJ, Ganzel BL, Goodwin MS, Belmonte MK. Harnessing repetitive behaviours to engage attention and learning in a novel therapy for autism: an exploratory analysis. Front Psychol. 2012;16(3):12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grayson A, Emerson A, Howard-Jones P, O’Neil L. Hidden communicative competence: case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis. Autism. 2012;16(1):75–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardinal DN, Hanson D, Wakeham J. Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Ment Retard. 1996;34(4):231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Point OutWords. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.

  17. Amato J Jr, Slavin D. A preliminary investigation of oromotor function in young verbal and nonverbal children with autism. Infant Toddler Interv Transdisciplinary J. 1998;8(2):175–84.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhat AN, Galloway JC, Landa RJ. Relation between early motor delay and later communication delay in infants at risk for autism. Infant Behav Dev. 2012;35(4):838–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Belmonte MK, Saxena-Chandhok T, Cherian R, Muneer R, George L, Karanth P. Oral motor deficits in speech-impaired children with autism. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013;7:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. MacDonald M, Lord C, Ulrich DA. The relationship of motor skills and adaptive behavior skills in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7(11):1383–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonald M, Lord C, Ulrich DA. Motor skills and calibrated autism severity in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2014;31(2):95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bedford R, Pickles A, Lord C. Early gross motor skills predict the subsequent development of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2016;9(9):993–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leonard HC, Bedford R, Charman T, Elsabbagh M, Johnson MH, Hill EL, et al. Motor development in children at risk of autism: a follow-up study of infant siblings. Autism. 2014;18(3):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lord C, Risi S, Pickles A. Trajectory of language development in autistic spectrum disorders. In: Rice ML, Warren SF, editors. Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004. p. 18–41.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Valla JM, Belmonte MK. Detail-oriented cognitive style and social communicative deficits, within and beyond the autism spectrum: Independent traits that grow into developmental interdependence. Dev Rev. 2013;33(4):371–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karanth P, Shaista S, Srikanth N. Efficacy of Communication DEALL- an indigenous early intervention program for children with autism spectrum disorders. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77(9):957–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tager-Flusberg H, Kasari C. Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: the neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Res. 2013;6(6):468–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stedman A, Taylor B, Erard M, Peura C, Siegel M. Are children severely affected by autism spectrum disorder underrepresented in treatment studies? An analysis of the literature. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1378–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gillespie-Smith K, Fletcher-Watson S. Designing AAC systems for children with autism: evidence from eye tracking research. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):160–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weisblatt EJ, Langensiepen CS, Cook B, Dias C, Plaisted Grant K, Dhariwal M, et al. A tablet computer-assisted motor and language skills training program to promote communication development in children with autism: development and pilot study. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2019;9:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Preston NJ, Farquhar MC, Walshe CE, Stevinson C, Ewing G, Calman LA, et al. Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2.

  32. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH, Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sealed Envelope. Accessed 11 Mar 2019.

  34. Hartley C, Allen ML. Symbolic understanding of pictures in low-functioning children with autism: the effects of iconicity and naming. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(1):15–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Happé FG. The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Dev. 1995;66(3):843–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Magic Fluids Lite. Accessed 08 Mar 2019.

  37. Heat Pad - Relaxing Heat Sensitive Surface!. Accessed 08 Mar 2019.

  38. Draw with Stars! Play With Shooting Stars. Accessed 08 Mar 2019.

  39. Baby Drum. Accessed 08 Mar 2019.

  40. Doodle Buddy Paint Draw App. Accessed 08 Mar 2019.

  41. Aquarium Live HD. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.

  42. Dogs. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.

  43. Mullen EM. Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Akshoomoff N. Use of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning for the assessment of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Child Neuropsychol. 2006;12(4–5):269–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bishop SL, Guthrie W, Coffing M, Lord C. Convergent validity of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the differential ability scales in children with autism spectrum disorders. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;116(5):331–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ozonoff S, Goodlin-Jones BL, Solomon M. Evidence-based assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005;34(3):523–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Grzadzinski R, Carr T, Colombi C, McGuire K, Dufek S, Pickles A, et al. Measuring changes in social communication behaviors: preliminary development of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC). J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(7):2464–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S, Gotham K, Bishop S. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) Manual (Part I): Modules 1–4. 2nd ed. Torrance: Western Psychological Services; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dunn LM, Dunn DM, Sewell J, Styles B, Brzyska B, Shamsan Y, et al. The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. 3rd ed. London: GL Assessment; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Constantino JN, Davis SA, Todd RD, Schindler MK, Gross MM, Brophy SL, et al. Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interview-revised. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33(4):427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tse J, Strulovitch J, Tagalakis V, Meng L, Fombonne E. Social skills training for adolescents with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(10):1960–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Koning C, Magill-Evans J, Volden J, Dick B. Efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy-based social skills intervention for school-aged boys with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7(10):1282–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Charters E. The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research: an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Educ J. 2003;12(2) 68-82.

  54. Hayden D, Square PA. The Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Namasivayam AK, Pukonen M, Goshulak D, Vickie YY, Kadis DS, Kroll R, Pang EW, Luc F. Relationship between speech motor control and speech intelligibility in children with speech sound disorders. J Commun Disord. 2013;46(3):264–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu VY, Kadis DS, Oh A, Goshulak D, Namasivayam A, Pukonen M, et al. Changes in voice onset time and motor speech skills in children following motor speech therapy: evidence from/pa/productions. Clin Linguist Phon. 2014;28(6):396–412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti VD, Balla AD. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Anagnostou E, Jones N, Huerta M, Halladay AK, Wang P, Scahill L, et al. Measuring social communication behaviors as a treatment endpoint in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2015;19(5):622–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Scahill L, Bearss K, Lecavalier L, Smith T, Swiezy N, Aman MG, et al. Effect of parent training on adaptive behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behavior: results of a randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(7):602–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Abidin RR. Parenting Stress Index. 4th ed. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hoffman L, Marquis J, Poston D, Summers JA, Turnbull A. Assessing family outcomes: psychometric evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. J Marriage Fam. 2006;68(4):1069–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kanne SM, Mazurek MO, Sikora D, Bellando J, Branum-Martin L, Handen B, et al. The Autism Impact Measure (AIM): initial development of a new tool for treatment outcome measurement. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(1):168–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gaskell G, Bauer M. Towards public accountability: beyond sampling, reliability and validity. In: Bauer M, Gaskell G, editors. Qualitative Researching with Text, Images and Sound. London: Sage; 2001. p. 336–50.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Deb S, Leeson V, Aimola L, Bodani M, Li L, Weaver T, et al. Aggression following traumatic brain injury: effectiveness of risperidone (AFTER): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):325.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Archana G. A manual from Communicaid: assessment of oro motor skills in toddlers. Bangalore: The Com DEALL Trust; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Goldstein H. Communication intervention for children with autism: a review of treatment efficacy. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002;32(5):373–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bal VH, Hendren RL, Charman T, Abbeduto L, Kasari C, Klinger LG, et al. Considerations from the 2017 IMFAR Preconference on Measuring Meaningful Outcomes from School-Age to Adulthood. Autism Res. 2018;11(11):1446–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Green J, Aldred C, Charman T, Le Couteur A, Emsley RA, Grahame V, et al. Paediatric Autism Communication Therapy-Generalised (PACT-G) against treatment as usual for reducing symptom severity in young children with autism spectrum disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The initial development of Point OutWords was supported by an agreement with Cornell University, Department of Human Development, under Faculty Early Career Development Award BCS-0846892 from the Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, US National Science Foundation, and by the United States - India Educational Foundation under a Fulbright-Nehru Senior Research Fellowship from the governments of India and the United States, awarded to MKB.

This protocol paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0816-20019). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.


Research for Patient Benefit Programme funded by:

UK National Institute for Health Research

Richmond House

79 Whitehall



Research for Patient Benefit programme funding: £250,000.00.

This study was designed by the authors in consultation with the NIHR Research Design Service. The NIHR has no further role in study design, analysis or interpretation of data and writing of the report. NIHR will approve the manuscript for publication. CPFT will support the trial with the recruitment of participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MKB, EJLW, JF, AR, and CD designed the study, with consultancy from SM and statistical contributions from SSV, who performed the sample size calculation and planned randomisation and statistical analysis. CD heads the Patient Steering Group. AMcK, KLH, AR and MKB wrote the manuscript. AMcK, KLH, and undergraduate assistants will collect data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

M. K. Belmonte

M. K. Belmonte’s research asks how domain-general cognitive capacities shape the developmental emergence of both social and non-social perception, cognition and action – giving rise to individual differences therein and autistic disorders thereof. His work in England, the USA, and India has related autistic traits, cognitive sex and gender differences, individualistic and collectivistic cultures, construal level, and psychological distance. Dr. Belmonte is the principal investigator for the study.

E. J. L. Weisblatt

E. J. L. Weisblatt is a consultant developmental neuropsychiatrist. She obtained her PhD in schizophrenia genetics. She is a member of the Cambridge Laboratory for Research in Autism (CLaRa) in the Psychology Department of the University of Cambridge, with research interests including perception, movement disorders and clinical phenotypes, genetics and neuropsychiatry. Dr. Weisblatt is the clinical lead for the study.

C. Días

C. Días is a psychology student and mother of two children on the autism spectrum with language and social communicative impairments. Her academic and practical interests centre on language development and cognitive developmental approaches to understanding and treating autism. She has for two years been a parent partner advising and facilitating the development of Point OutWords. Ms. Días is the trial’s stakeholder co-investigator and head of the patient steering committee.

J. Foster

J. Foster is a specialist in qualitative research, with research focus pertaining to the use of ethnography, focus-group and narrative interviews to characterise understandings of mental health problems amongst service users, professionals and the public, and qualitative methods to understand how end users interact with medical and educational technologies. Dr. Foster is the qualitative research specialist.

S. S. Villar

S. S. Villar is a programme leader track at the MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge and an expert in adaptive design of clinical trials. Dr. Villar is the project statistician.

S. Murphy

S. Murphy is a developmental psychologist and Associate Director of the NIHR Research Design Service East of England. She is a specialist in childhood language disorders and technologies for language support, as well as conducting trials in NHS mental health trusts and schools. Dr. Murphy is a contributor to study development and dissemination.

A. McKinney

A. McKinney completed her undergraduate and M. Litt degrees in psychology at University College Dublin, Ireland, graduating in 2017 and 2019 respectively. Her research interests include social cognition, autism, and language development. Miss McKinney is a research assistant.

K. L. Hotson

K. L. Hotson completed her undergraduate degree in psychology with clinical psychology at the University of Lincoln. She is experienced in care coordination and support for individuals with autism, including support of language and communication needs. Miss Hotson is a research assistant.

A. Rybicki

A. Rybicki is a BBSRC-funded PhD student in Neuroscience at the University of Birmingham. Her current research investigates disorders of movement and social cognition in those with autism spectrum conditions. Miss Rybicki is a contributor to study design.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ailbhe McKinney.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted via the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) on 7 January 2019, IRAS project ID: 209775. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Point OutWords is free, open-source software for the iPad downloadable from the Apple App Store. MKB directed the development of Point OutWords and will not receive any royalties. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

SPIRIT 2013 Checklist: Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKinney, A., Hotson, K.L., Rybicki, A. et al. Point OutWords: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motor skills intervention to promote communicative development in non-verbal children with autism. Trials 21, 109 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: