Skip to main content

Investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FITNET-NHS (Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the NHS) compared to activity management to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME): amendment to the published protocol

A Study protocol to this article was published on 22 February 2018

Abstract

The FITNET-NHS Trial is a UK, national, trial investigating whether an online cognitive behavioural therapy program (FITNET-NHS) for treating chronic fatigue syndrome/ME in adolescents is clinically effective and cost-effective in the NHS. At the time of writing (September 2019), the trial was recruiting participants. This article presents an update to the planned sample size and data collection duration previously published within the trial protocol.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ID: 18020851. Registered 8 April 2016.

Background

The FITNET-NHS Trial is a United Kingdom (UK), national ,randomised controlled trial testing the acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programme, FITNET-NHS (Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service), designed to treat adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) [1]. In the UK, most young people with CFS/ME do not have access to local NHS specialist medical care for the condition, as there are limited paediatric CFS/ME specialist centres in the UK. The FITNET-NHS trial was set up to test the online delivery of specialist care from one specialist paediatric CFS/ME site in the south west of England as a means of addressing this problem. Recruitment projections were estimated in advance and were based on reaching national paediatric CFS/ME populations at high volumes – made possible due to our innovative methodology using entirely remote processes for recruitment and treatment delivery. The original sample size target if achieved would have given us sufficient statistical power to detect a true effect of FITNET-NHS within the subgroup of participants with co-morbid mood disorder.

The current article is an amendment to our previously published protocol for the FITNET-NHS Trial: Baos et al. (2018) [1].

Amendment

Recruitment into the FITNET-NHS Trial began on 1 November 2016. In mid-2018, it became apparent that the recruitment rate would not allow us to achieve our original sample size target (n = 734) without a substantial extension to the recruitment period. The original sample size was selected to provide 80% power to detect a 0.4-standard deviation (SD) difference at 5% significance with 10% attrition on the primary outcome in a subgroup of participants (estimated to be 30% or n = 220) with co-morbid mood disorders of anxiety and depression. For all participants (with or without co-morbid mood disorders), the original sample size provided 97% power at 1% significance to detect a 0.35-SD difference on the primary outcome (Short Form Health Survey; Physical function Subscale (SF-36-PFS) score) at 6 months.

We reviewed the trial with the funders – National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA, on 10 July 2018) and consulted with the Trial Management Group (TMG, on 12 September 2018 and 18 October 2018), the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC, on 10 October 2018 and by email report on 11 March 2019) and the Trial Steering Committee (TSC, on 28 November 2018).

In September 2018, we calculated the required sample size for the primary outcome in all participants (with or without co-morbid mood disorders):

Data on 266 children will give us 90% power at 5% significance to detect a 0.4-SD difference on the SF-36-PFS. With attrition currently at approximately 15%, we will need to recruit 314 children. This is achievable (based on recruitment rates to date) by the end of October 2020.

This gave us a new recruitment target of 314 children in total, 157 in each treatment group

We considered the issue of co-morbid disorders. On 2 October 2018, we investigated the rate of co-morbid mood disorders in FITNET-NHS participants at baseline. This was higher than our original estimates as the rate of co-morbid mood disorders was 40% (compared to 30% in our original estimates). With the revised sample size target of 314 there will be approximately 106 participants with co-morbid mood disorders (53 in each treatment group). This will give 53% power at 5% significance to detect a 0.4-SD difference on the SF-36-PFS between treatment groups within this co-morbid subgroup.

From consultation with the NIHR HTA, TSC, DSMC and TMG, the decision was made to agree revised recruitment targets and extend the recruitment time by 6 months to enable the FITNET-NHS Trial to achieve the primary aim of testing the effectiveness (and cost-effectiveness) of the FITNET-NHS treatment compared to Activity Management. The NIHR HTA gave their approval in principle of this change on 30 January 2019, subsequent to provision of documentation. Full NIHR HTA approval for revised recruitment target and the contract variation to include the 6-month extension to the project timeline was received on 24 April 2019. We will, therefore, recruit 314 children and recruitment will finish on 31 October 2020. Follow up will finish on 31 October 2021.

We have followed standard procedures to update all relevant organisations regarding these changes, including trial registration (ISRCTN, ID: 18020851: change accepted and records updated on 1 July 2019), and submitting as a substantial trial amendment to the Research Ethics Committee (REC, approved on 26 July 2019) and the Health Research Authority (HRA, approved on 10 July 2019).

With our revised recruitment target of 314 participants, the FITNET-NHS is still set to be the largest paediatric CFS/ME treatment trial in the UK and globally, the results of which will should the future of paediatric CFS/ME treatment delivery.

Availability of data and materials

The research staff will have access to the de-identified data during the project period, and 5 years following the completion of the trial for contributing to knowledge building through dissemination of research reports.

Abbreviations

CBT:

Cognitive behavioural therapy

CFS/ME:

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis

DSMC:

Data Safety and Monitoring Committee

FITNET-NHS:

Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the NHS

HRA:

Health Research Authority

ISRCTN:

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number

NIHR HTA:

National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment

REC:

Research Ethics Committee

SD:

Standard deviation

SF-36-PFS:

Short Form Health Survey (36 question): Physical Function Subscale

TMG:

Trial Management Group

TSC:

Trial Steering Committee

UK:

United Kingdom

Reference

  1. Baos S, Brigden A, Anderson E, Hollingworth W, Price S, Mills N, et al. Investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FITNET-NHS (Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the NHS) compared to Activity Management to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This trial has been designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (a UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Unit) which as part of the Bristol Trials Centre receives NIHR CTU support funding. This project is independent research-funded by the NIHR HTA 14/192/109 and supported by the NIHR (NIHR Senior Research Fellowship: Professor Esther Crawley, SRF-2013-06-013). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA, the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health. We would like to thank the both the Patient Advisory Group and the Young People’s Advisory Group for their invaluable contributions to the design of the trial. We would like to acknowledge that the SF-36 questionnaire was developed at RAND as part of the Medical Outcomes Study. Trial data are collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Bristol and supported by BRTC.

Funding

The trial is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (14/192/109). The sponsor is the University of Bristol. The trial is monitored and audited in accordance with the sponsor’s procedures. Indemnity for the trial is provided by the University of Bristol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EC: trial conception, chief investigator, reviewing of manuscript. EA: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, trial manager, drafting and reviewing of manuscript. MR: oversight of the trial as part of TMG, trial research associate, manuscript review. WH: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, lead on health economics, manuscript review. NM: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, lead on qualitative methods, manuscript review. LB: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, qualitative researcher, manuscript review. DG: trial statistician, confidential reporting to the Data Monitoring Committee, manuscript drafting and review. CM: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, statistical lead, manuscript drafting and review. RP: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, qualitative researcher, manuscript review. DK: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, lead on recruitment from primary care, manuscript review. JM: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, lead on data linkage, manuscript review. PS: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, clinical psychology support, manuscript review. HK: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, lead clinical psychologist, trained and supervised therapists, manuscript review. EVP: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, FITNET advisor, manuscript review. SN: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, FITNET advisor, manuscript review. GB: oversight of the trial as part of the TMG, FITNET advisor, manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The RCT protocol has been reviewed and approved by the South West – Frenchay Research Ethics Committee (16/SW/0268). Both the young person and their caregiver need to give consent/assent. Amendments to the trial protocol are approved by the sponsor (and the Research Ethics Committee if appropriate) prior to implementation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

EC is a medical advisor for the Sussex and Kent ME Society.

HK and GB received royalties for publication of treatment manual for CBT in CFS/ME in adults.

Other than those stated, above, the remaining authors have nothing to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, E., Gaunt, D., Metcalfe, C. et al. Investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FITNET-NHS (Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the NHS) compared to activity management to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME): amendment to the published protocol. Trials 20, 750 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3895-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3895-1

Keywords