- Study protocol
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicentre, phase III study on organ preservation with Custodiol-N solution compared with Custodiol® solution in organ transplantation (kidney, liver and pancreas)
Trials volume 21, Article number: 62 (2020)
Organ preservation before transplantation is still a challenge. Both the University of Wisconsin and Bretschneider’s histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK; Custodiol®) solution are standard for liver, kidney and pancreas preservation. Organ preservation with both solutions is comparable; recently, however, Custodiol® solution has been modified to Custodiol-N according to the needs of today. Thus, our study was defined to study its effect in clinical transplantation.
Patients undergoing kidney transplantation (n = 412) (including approximately 30 combined kidney–pancreas) or liver transplantation (n = 202) receive grafts that have been cold stored in either Custodiol® or Custodiol-N to demonstrate noninferiority of Custodiol-N regarding both graft function and graft injury after transplantation.
Preclinical data have clearly shown that Custodiol-N is superior to Custodiol® in cold static organ preservation via mechanisms including inhibition of hypoxic cell injury, cold-induced cell injury and avoidance of adverse effects during warm exposure to the solution. Further clinical safety data on Custodiol-N for cardioplegia are available. Thus, this study was designed to compare Custodiol® with Custodiol-N for the first time in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicentre, phase III clinical transplantation trial.
Eudra-CT, 2017–002198-20. Registered on 28 November 2018.
Bretschneider’s histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK; Custodiol®) solution was developed at the end of the 1970s and was first used in the setting of cardiac surgery as a cardioplegic solution in 1982. At the beginning of the 1980s, the solution began to be used for other purposes; first for kidney preservation, and later for liver and pancreas preservation as well. Since 2000, additional knowledge has been gained on the mechanisms of cell and tissue injury during cold ischemia. Based on these experimental findings, traditional Custodiol® solution has been modified to Custodiol-N (for the components of each, see Table 1).
It has been shown in several cell types that the amino acids glycine and alanine provide protection against hypoxic or ischemic cell injury [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] which is attributed to a pathological membrane pore forming under hypoxic conditions and leading to alterations of the cellular ion homeostasis [3, 5, 8]. Furthermore, it has become clear that hypothermia, used to protect tissues against ischemic injury, also triggers injury on its own account [9,10,11,12,13]. This cold-induced cell injury affects numerous cell types but, in particular, affects endothelial cells, jeopardizing vascular function after reperfusion, and is mediated by intracellular “redox-active” iron [11, 14,15,16]. Based on these experimental findings, the traditional Custodiol® solution was fortified with the amino acids glycine and alanine to inhibit the formation of the hypoxia-induced plasma membrane pore. Furthermore, it was supplemented by the strong, but poorly membrane-permeable, iron chelator deferoxamine and the new, membrane-permeable iron chelator LK-614 to inhibit cold-induced cell injury.
Furthermore, recent studies have shown that the buffer histidine, essential for the efficiency of Custodiol® (see above), can have adverse effects on some cell types rich in “redox-active” iron, particularly if used at very high concentrations . The histidine derivative N-acetyl-histidine does not display these adverse effects but has a similar buffering power to histidine. Therefore, part of the histidine in Custodiol® (as much as possible without altering the successful ion composition of the solution) was replaced by the superior derivative N-acetyl-histidine.
Microcirculatory disturbances have been reported following reperfusion of diverse organs. In various experimental models, the troublesome application of the vasodilator nitric oxide or simply the supplementation of L-arginine (the substrate of the endogenous nitric oxide-producing enzymes) has been proven to decrease these microcirculatory disturbances [18,19,20,21]. Therefore, in Custodiol-N, L-arginine is supplemented. As mannitol is not impermeable to all cell types (i.e. hepatocytes ), it has been replaced with saccharose. Although efficient buffering is important to prevent severe acidosis, moderate acidosis has been shown to provide protection against ischemic injury [23, 24]; therefore Custodiol-N has a slightly lower pH than Custodiol®. Finally, aspartate has been added to replenish intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in combination with the ketoglutarate that is already present in Custodiol® for an efficient energy production after reperfusion. Besides these alterations, the successful composition of Custodiol® has been maintained.
This amino acid-fortified and iron chelator-supplemented Custodiol-N proved to be superior to Custodiol® in in vitro studies using diverse cell types; in particular, Custodiol-N showed far superior inhibition of hypoxic cell injury, superior to far superior inhibition of cold-induced cell injury, and avoidance of adverse effects; this was also seen during warm exposure to the solution [14, 25].
In a study on the isolated perfused rat heart (Langendorff model), a protective effect towards the injury to the coronary vasculature inflicted by cold ischemia was shown by the iron chelators deferoxamine and LK-614, that is the iron chelators present in Custodiol-N .
A further study demonstrated that Custodiol-N protects liver grafts with microvesicular steatosis caused by acute toxic injury from cold ischemic injury better than Custodiol®, most likely via inhibition of hypoxic injury and oxidative stress and amelioration of the inflammatory reaction occurring upon reperfusion .
The objective of this clinical trial is to demonstrate noninferiority of graft preservation with Custodiol-N compared to Custodiol® with respect to both graft function and injury after transplantation of kidney, liver or combined kidney–pancreas.
Primary end points
The primary end point after kidney transplantation is delayed graft function, defined as dialysis requirement during the first week after transplantation.
After liver transplantation, the primary end point is the area under the curve (AUC) of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) during the first 7 days after surgery (minimum one measurement per day).
The secondary objectives after kidney transplantation are the incidence of primary poor function defined as creatinine >250 μmol/l after 90 days, serum creatinine, creatinine modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) clearance, urea and haemoglobin after 90 days, and the requirement for dialysis until 90 days after transplantation, as well as biopsy-proven rejection.
The secondary end points after pancreatic transplantation include insulin requirements on postoperative days 3, 30 and 90. Furthermore, they include α-amylase, lipase, and C-reactive protein levels at 1 and 3 days, and both C-peptide and glycated haemoglobin levels at postoperative days 30 and 90. Moreover, pancreatic complications (i.e. graft pancreatitis, anastomotic leak and vascular complications including thrombosis, stenosis, and bleeding) will be compared, while fasting glucose after 90 days will be documented.
The secondary end points after liver transplantation include the absolute peak serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level within the first 7 days after transplantation, the peak serum ALT and LDH levels, and serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ALT, LDH, and total albumin levels, and prothrombin time at postoperative day 90. Further biliary complications (i.e. the number of episodes of cholestasis, therapy for cholangitis, episodes of biliary leakage and intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic biliary strictures) will be assessed.
This multicentre study is designed as a prospective, randomized and single-blinded trial. It is a phase III comparison study of organ preservation intended to demonstrate the noninferiority of Custodiol-N compared with Custodiol® in organ transplantation for the kidney, liver and pancreas. Study centres are the General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria, and the Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria (Additional file 1).
Donor (liver, kidney, and combined kidney–pancreas) criteria
Deceased adult donors (≥18 years) fulfilling the criteria for organ donation are included in the study.
Patient (recipient) criteria
Patients (≥18 years) eligible for whole organ transplantation are included in the study.
Generally, patients with previous liver, kidney and combined kidney–pancreas transplantation are excluded.
Donor (liver, kidney, and combined kidney–pancreas) criteria
Donors whose organs are allocated to be used outside of Austria, a general refusal of organ donation, and being a donor after death due to cardiac causes are excluded.
Patient (recipient) criteria
Pregnant or lactating patients, recipients participating in any other interventional study (e.g. studies involving compounds/interventions aimed at the reduction of preservation and/or ischemia/reperfusion injury) and all combined allocations other than the pancreas and kidney are excluded from the study.
Double-kidney transplant patients, those on machine perfusion, and all patients with panel reactive antibody >0% according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2009 guidelines are excluded.
Machine-perfused organs are excluded from the study as well as recipients undergoing re-transplantation.
The study will continue until 412 kidney recipients and 202 liver recipients have been enrolled, treated and followed up. The number of combined kidney–pancreas transplants will be purely incidental and is estimated to be around 30. The overall duration for the trial is expected to be approximately 48 months. The duration of the trial for each participant is expected to be 3 months (for transplantation and a follow-up period of 90 days).
Withdrawal of patients
Patients who discontinue participation in the clinical study on their own will be defined as premature withdrawals. Every patient has the right to withdraw their consent to participation in the clinical trial at any time and without giving reasons. This will not cause them to be disadvantaged. Nevertheless, the investigator must make every effort to find out the reasons why the patient has withdrawn from the study, while taking care not to compromise the patient’s rights. The time of withdrawal, the results available up to that time and, if known, the reason for the patient’s withdrawal are to be documented in the trial report form.
All ongoing adverse events (AEs)/serious adverse events (SAEs) in withdrawn participants have to be followed up until no more signs and symptoms are verifiable or the participant is in a stable condition. Patients who withdraw will not be replaced.
The reported organ donors are allocated according to the Eurotransplant guidelines without influence from the study. Only organs allocated to a patient who has signed the informed consent will be randomized.
Multiorgan donation is performed according to institutional guidelines. Organ perfusion is performed using Custodiol® as the standard preservation solution. Subsequently, organs allocated to a study centre with patients who have signed the informed consent will be randomized to either study medication. In case of simultaneous transplantation of the kidney and pancreas, both organs will be randomized together for the same study arm.
After randomization, back table perfusion with study medications will be performed via the renal artery for the kidney, the hepatic artery as well as the portal vein for the liver, and the mesenteric artery and portal vein for the pancreas using approximately 250–1000 ml of study medication per organ (Custodiol® or Custodiol-N). Subsequently, the grafts will be stored in 1000 ml of the study medication. The allocated study medication is provided to the recipient site. Before transplantation, back table perfusion using approximately 250–1000 ml of the study medication will be optionally performed.
Randomization and blinding
Recipients with signed informed consent meeting all inclusion criteria and without any exclusion criteria will undergo transplantation with grafts that have been randomized to Custodiol® or Custodiol-N in a blinded manner. Grafts are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Custodiol® or Custodiol-N. After randomization, the randomized solution will be prepared for treatment at the donor site. Study medication will not be blinded for the investigator. Randomization will be performed using the web-based randomization service “Randomizer for Clinical Trials” developed at the Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Packaging and labelling
Trial medication will be provided by the sponsor as 1-litre bags (3 litres for one patient) and the appropriate amount of lyophilisate per bag to the distributing pharmacy. Packages will be opaque and labelled with either “Custodiol®” or “Custodiol-N” in an unblinded fashion and with the study title, EudraCT number and “Zur klinischen Prüfung bestimmt”, according to the Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament. Each bag will be labelled in the same way. To ensure allocation concealment, clinical monitors will check that unused medication packages have not been opened.
The trial will begin when history taking has shown that the criteria for inclusion in the trial have been met (performed by the study team of transplant surgeons), and when the patient has been fully informed regarding the objective of the study, the trial product, the risks and the insurance cover, and when the signed declaration of consent is available. Allocation principles are shown in Fig. 1.
Organ perfusion technique
The perfusion of all abdominal organs with cold (2–8°C) Custodiol® will be performed according to the standard procedure. Briefly, after mobilization and appropriate preparation of intra-abdominal organs and blood vessels and clamping of the aorta above the superior mesenteric artery, perfusion with Custodiol® is started via the infrarenal aorta. The duration of perfusion is usually 10–15 min. During perfusion, the abdominal cavity is cooled with cold physiological NaCl solution. Cold storage of grafts must be performed in the solution used for perfusion of the donor.
Screening of donor and graft status
The screening visit includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessment of demographic data (age and gender), the clinical status (sodium, serum creatinine, urea, catecholamines (yes/no)), mechanical or medicamentous cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the donor (yes/no), the graft damage (biopsy after reperfusion, damage to vessels, laceration), and duration of cold ischemia (Fig. 2).
Screening of the recipient
The screening visit includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria (to test female patients ≤55 years for pregnancy), assessment of demographic data (age and gender) of the recipient, and informed consent by the study team. Within 24 h before transplantation, the recipients’ routine laboratory results (serum creatinine, creatinine MDRD clearance and urea) are recorded. Diuresis is also assessed. Additionally, the occurrence of adverse advents and concomitant medication will be recorded. Events compromising the blinding of the patient will be recorded as protocol deviations.
Follow-up will be performed daily up to day 7, and at postoperative days 30 (±3 days) and 90 (±7 days). These follow-up visits assess the recipient’s clinical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification), episodes of dialysis, the recipients’ routine laboratory results (serum creatinine, creatinine MDRD clearance, urea) and the diuresis per hour (up to 7 days). Haemoglobin will be analysed on day 30 and after 90 days. Additionally, the occurrence of biopsy-proven rejections (according to Banff criteria) and adverse advents are recorded. Relevant concomitant medication (catecholamines, immunosuppression, anti-infectives, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, and diuretics) will be recorded in detail up to day 7 of follow-up and at days 30 and 90 after transplantation as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ only.
Screening of donor and graft status
The screening visit includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessment of demographic data (age and gender) and the clinical status (sodium, AST, ALT, LDH, bilirubin, catecholamines (yes/no), reanimation (yes/no)) of the donor, the graft damage (biopsy after reperfusion, damage to vessels, laceration), biopsy (steatosis (micro-/macrovesicular)), inflammatory changes, fibrosis and duration of cold ischemia (Fig. 3).
Screening of the recipient
The screening visit includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria (to test female patients ≤55 years for pregnancy), assessment of demographic data (age and gender) of the recipient, and informed consent. Within 24 h before transplantation, the recipients’ clinical status (calculated model for end-stage liver disease score) and the recipients’ routine laboratory results (serum bilirubin, AST, ALT, LDH, total albumin) are assessed. Additionally, the occurrence of adverse advents and concomitant medication will be recorded. Events compromising the blinding of the patient will be recorded as protocol deviations.
Follow-up will be performed daily up to day 7, and at postoperative days 30 (±3 days) and 90 (±7 days). These follow-up visits assess the recipient’s clinical status (ASA classification), biopsy-proven rejection episodes (according to Banff criteria), the recipient’s routine laboratory results (serum bilirubin, AST, ALT (a minimum of two times per day between days 1–7), LDH, total albumin) and prothrombin time after 30 days and 3 months, and biliary complications (number of episodes of cholestasis, therapy for cholangitis, episodes of biliary leakage and intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic biliary strictures). Additionally, the occurrence of any adverse advents will be recorded. Relevant concomitant medication (catecholamines, immunosuppression, anti-infectives, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, and diuretics) will be recorded in detail up to day 7 of follow-up and at days 30 and 90 after transplantation as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ only. Graft survival will be recorded, and parenteral nutrition will be checked.
Screening of donor and graft status
The screening visit includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessment of demographic data (age and sex), the clinical status (sodium, serum creatinine, urea, catecholamines (yes/no), reanimation (yes/no) of the donor) and the graft damage (kidney biopsy, damage to vessels, laceration). Additionally, the donor status according to the Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score and the duration of cold ischemia for the pancreas and kidney are recorded (Fig. 4).
Screening of the recipient
The screening of the recipient includes a check of the inclusion and exclusion criteria (to test female patients ≤55 years for pregnancy), assessment of demographic data (age and gender) of the recipient, and informed consent. Within 24 h before transplantation, in addition to the recipient’s clinical status (ASA classification) and routine laboratory results (serum creatinine, creatinine MDRD clearance, urea) the recipient’s C-reactive protein is recorded. Diuresis is also assessed.
Follow-up will be performed daily up to day 7, and at postoperative days 30 (±3 days) and 90 (±7 days). These follow-up visits assess the recipient’s clinical status (ASA classification), episodes of dialysis, the recipient’s routine laboratory results (serum creatinine, creatinine MDRD clearance, urea) and the diuresis per hour (up to 7 days). Haemoglobin will be analysed on day 30 and after 90 days. Additionally, the occurrence of biopsy-proven rejections (according to Banff criteria) and adverse advents are recorded. Relevant concomitant medication (catecholamines, immunosuppressors, anti-infectives, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, diuretics) will be recorded in detail up to day 7 of follow-up and at days 30 and 90 after transplantation as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ only. Follow-up visits at day 1, day 3, day 30 and day 90 will assess pancreatic complications such as graft pancreatitis and anastomotic leak and vascular complications (thrombosis, stenosis, bleeding). The routine laboratory findings (lipase, α-amylase and C-reactive protein) are measured on day 1 and 3 days after transplantation. Further insulin requirements on days 3 and 30 (±3 days) and after 90 days will be assessed. The glycated haemoglobin level and C-peptide level are measured at days 30 and 90 after transplantation. Fasting glucose will also be documented 90 days after transplantation. Adverse events are documented up to day 90. Pancreas-relevant concomitant medication (insulin/antidiabetics) will be documented in detail up to day 3 of follow-up and at days 30 and 90 after transplantation as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ only. Graft survival will be recorded.
Data collection and handling
All information required by the protocol and collected during the trial must be entered by the investigator, or a designated representative, in the electronic case report form (eCRF). Each patient will be assigned a site number and a site-specific screening number reflecting the chronological order of screening. Any link of the site number to a patient’s identity will be kept confidential at the study site. Each donor organ will be identified by a randomization code while the type of organ is conveyed implicitly; right and left kidneys will be identified. The investigator, or a designated representative, should complete the eCRF pages as soon as possible after the information is collected, preferably on the same day as a trial participant is seen for an examination, treatment, or any other trial procedure. Any pending entries must be completed immediately after the final examination. Explanation should be given for all missing data.
Data management is accomplished according to the appropriate standard operating procedures valid in the Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, Austria.
After completion of the query process, the database will be closed and exported into the statistical evaluation system for analysis.
Storage and archiving of data
All important trial documents (e.g. the eCRF) will be archived by the sponsor for at least 10 years after the trial termination.
The investigator(s) will archive all trial data (source data and the Investigator Site File including the participant identification list and relevant correspondence) according to section 4.9 of the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Consolidated Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (E6) and according to local law or regulations .
Sample size determination
Sample sizes have been calculated for the kidney and liver. The trial will stop once both sample sizes have been reached.
Very few patients are expected to be lost to follow-up as they will be under close clinical observation. Also, a patient’s active termination from the study is expected to happen very rarely as very few procedures will be study-specific and personal data will be used for transplantation registers anyway. Therefore, no additional patients are planned to be enrolled to make up for attrition effects.
In a systematic review by O’Callaghan et al. , delayed graft function was chosen as the main end point. For the largest trials assessing HTK solutions, the rates for this vary at around 30%. For Custodiol-N, an increase of this rate by one-half to 45% has been defined as noncritical. In order to reject the hypothesis that the delayed graft function rate increases by 15% or more at the alpha level of 0.025 with a power of 90%, 412 patients are needed. This sample size calculation is based on the score test of Farrington and Manning for a noninferiority test comparing two proportions. Autocorrelation effects caused by the transplant of two kidneys per donor to different patients have been assessed as negligible.
The success of liver transplantation is determined by the AUC of ALT measurements over the first 7 days after implantation. In a sample of 25 consecutively treated patients, the ALT level in the period between surgery and 5 days had an AUC of about 3800 mg*d/dl with a standard deviation of about 2000 mg*d/dL. Assuming a coefficient of variation of 0.5, in order to reject the hypothesis that the peak level rises by 25% or more at the alpha level of 0.025 with a power of 90%, 202 patients are needed. For sample size calculation, a two-sample t test of the mean ratio with lognormal data was used.
Very few pancreata are transplanted in Austria. We do not expect to collect enough data in a reasonable amount of time about the success rates of pancreatic transplantation. Therefore, data on success and safety will be collected on these patients but the results will only be presented in a descriptive way.
All organs randomized and implanted or with an attempt to implant will be included in the analysis according to the randomized treatment group. Organs randomized but not implanted will count as screening failures.
All patients treated according to the study protocol will be included in the per-protocol set. A list of protocol deviations sufficient to exclude patients from this set will be compiled by the sponsor, the main investigator and the biostatistician before analysis starts. The primary analysis will be performed on the per-protocol set.
All tests of the primary criteria with respect to the liver and kidney would have to successfully reject the null hypothesis to support a favourable result with respect to Custodiol-N. Null hypothesis tests will be repeated for intention-to-treat sets.
According to GCP, an AE is defined as follows: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
An AE may be a new symptom/medical condition, new diagnosis, change in laboratory parameters, intercurrent disease or accidents, worsening of medical conditions/diseases existing before the start of the clinical trial or recurrence of disease.
A pre-existing disease or symptom will not be considered an adverse event unless there is an untoward change in its intensity, frequency or quality. This change will be documented by an investigator.
Surgical procedures themselves are not AEs; they are therapeutic measures for conditions that require surgery. The condition for which the surgery is required may be an AE. Planned/elective surgical measures and the condition(s) leading to these measures are not AEs if the condition leading to the measure was present prior to the inclusion into the trial. All AEs (inclusive of SAEs) will be documented on an AE form. AEs are classified as “nonserious” or “serious”.
Serious adverse event
An SAE is one that at any dose (and also overdose) results in death, is life-threatening (the term life-threatening refers to an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of event and not to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it was more severe), requires hospitalization of the participant or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is otherwise medically relevant. All SAEs will additionally be documented on an SAE form.
An ‘unexpected’ adverse event is one in which the nature or severity is not consistent with the applicable product information, e.g. the Investigator’s Brochure. Furthermore, reports which add significant information on specificity or severity of a known adverse reaction constitute ‘unexpected’ events. Specific examples would be acute renal failure as an expected adverse reaction with a subsequent new occurrence of interstitial nephritis and hepatitis with a first occurrence of fulminant hepatitis.
SAEs that are both suspected, i.e. possibly related to the medicinal investigational product, and ‘unexpected’, i.e. the nature and/or severity of which is not consistent with the applicable product information (Investigator’s Brochure), are to be classified as suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs).
In cases where either the investigator who primarily reported the SAE or the second assessor classifies the SAE as ‘suspected’, i.e. related to the medicinal investigational product, and the SAE is ‘unexpected’, it will be categorized as a SUSAR. All SUSARs are subject to expedited reporting to the responsible ethics committee(s), the competent higher federal authority (“Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen”) and to all participating investigators.
Period of observation and documentation
AEs will be documented from the time of transplantation up to the last follow-up visit at day 90. All participants who present AEs, whether considered associated with the use of the trial medication or not, will be monitored by the responsible investigator to determine their outcome. The clinical course of the AE will be followed up until resolution/normalization of the changed parameter or until achievement of a stable condition.
Good clinical practice
The procedures set out in this trial protocol pertaining to the conduct, evaluation, and documentation of this trial are designed to ensure that all persons involved in the trial abide by GCP and the ethical principles described in the applicable version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial will be carried out in keeping with local legal and regulatory requirements.
Patient information and informed consent
Before being admitted to the clinical trial, a potential participant must consent after the main features of the clinical trial have been explained in a form understandable to them. Consent has to be given after patient education about transplantation and before the transplantation procedure. The participant must give consent in writing. The signed informed consent form will be filled in by the study team. A copy of the signed informed consent document must be given to the participant. The documents must be in a language understandable to the participant and must specify who informed the participant about the trial. The participants will be informed as soon as possible if new information may influence their decision to participate in the trial. The communication of this information should be documented.
The data obtained during the course of this trial will be treated pursuant to the Austrian Datenschutzgesetz 2000.
During the clinical trial, participants will be identified solely by their year of birth and an individual identification code (participant number, randomization number). Trial findings stored on a computer will be stored in accordance with local data protection law and will be handled in the strictest confidence. For the protection of these data, organizational procedures are implemented to prevent distribution of data to unauthorized persons. The appropriate regulations pertaining to local data legislation will be fulfilled in their entirety.
The participant consents in writing to release the investigator from their professional discretion in so far as to allow inspection of the original data for monitoring purposes by health authorities and authorized persons (inspectors, monitors, auditors). Authorized persons (clinical monitors, auditors, inspectors) may inspect the participant-related data collected during the trial ensuring the data protection law. The investigator will maintain a participant identification list (participant numbers with the corresponding participant names) to enable records to be identified.
Participants who did not consent to circulate their pseudonymized data will not be included into the trial.
The study will be performed in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and will thus require regular monitoring visits. Monitoring will be done by personal visits from a clinical monitor according to standard operating procedures. Monitoring visits will occur based on patient accruals and the availability of eCRFs. The monitor will review the entries into the eCRFs on the basis of source documents. Details of monitoring (i.e. frequency of visits and/or the extent of source data verification) will be specified in the monitoring manual for this trial. Between these visits, contacts with study site personnel will be made by telephone, by fax or by mail, to ensure that the trial is conducted according to the protocol and the regulatory requirements.
For each patient included in the study, a specific file (i.e. institution file) must exist containing original data, on which the information recorded on the eCRF is based. Source documents and eCRFs must not be exact copies of each other. As a general rule, medical information that is not specifically required by the study (e.g. patient gender, prior medical history, prior medication, type of surgical procedure, and so forth) must be found in the source medical documents (and on the eCRF). Information specifically required by the protocol and not required by routine clinical care may be recorded directly onto the eCRF without appearing in the source documents. In addition, source documents must mention that the patient has been included in an investigational study. Finally, there must be no data that are inconsistent between the eCRF and source documents.
All important trial documents (e.g. the eCRF) will be archived by the sponsor for at least 15 years after the trial termination. The investigator(s) will archive all trial data according to the section 4.9 of the ICH Consolidated Guidelines on GCP (E6) and to local law or regulations. The investigator should ensure that all persons assisting with the trial are adequately informed about the protocol, any amendments to the protocol, the trial treatments, and their trial-related duties and functions. There are no plans for granting public access to the full protocol, participant-level dataset, or statistical code.
All information concerning the trial is confidential before publication. Interim data or final data can only be published in agreement between the coordinating investigator and Dr. F. Köhler Chemie GmbH. Publication of the results in an international peer-reviewed journal is planned at the end of study, in consultation and with the agreement of representatives of the centre.
Custodiol-N is based on the principles of the Custodiol® solution. Although there are no extensive study data available, we can refer to more than 30 years of experience with the use of Custodiol®. Since the pharmaceutical production of Custodiol® solution began, it is estimated to have been used in more than three million patients. The heart, the kidneys, the liver, the pancreas and even autologous vein grafts (in the context of coronary artery surgery) have all been treated with the solution. During the past 5 years in Germany alone, about 250,000 interventions in cardiac surgery were performed using Custodiol®.
The special value of Custodiol® for the preservation of the heart, liver and kidney intended for transplantation is emphasized by the fact that Custodiol® solution is regarded by Eurotransplant as one of the standards for preservation of these organs. Custodiol® solution is now in use in more than 90 countries worldwide for intraoperative myocardial protection and organ preservation.
Side effects specific to Custodiol® solution or induced by it have not been described in any part of the world, provided that the product had been used in accordance with its directions.
Based on experimental findings using traditional Custodiol® solution, a new Custodiol® solution (Custodiol-N) has been developed. Except for a few alterations, the successful composition of Custodiol® has been maintained with a high degree of safety, tolerability and efficacy. However, Custodiol-N proved to be superior to Custodiol® solution in in vitro studies concerning inhibition of hypoxic cell injury, inhibition of cold-induced cell injury and avoidance of adverse effects during warm exposure to the solution. The aim of this investigation is to demonstrate noninferiority of graft preservation with Custodiol-N compared to Custodiol® with respect to both graft function and injury after transplantation of kidney, liver or pancreas.
The study started in March 2019. The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The overall duration for the trial is expected to be approximately 48 months. Protocol number of the study protocol: version 2.2. from 28 January 2019.
Availability of data and materials
There are no data available yet; patient enrolment will start in March 2019.
American Society of Anesthesiologists
Area under the curve
Electronic case report form
Good clinical practice
International Council for Harmonisation
Modification of diet in renal disease
Serious adverse event
Suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction
Brecht M, de Groot H. Protection from hypoxic injury in cultured hepatocytes by glycine, alanine, and serine. Amino Acids. 1994;6:25–35.
Weinberg JM. The effect of amino acids on ischemic and toxic injury to the kidney. Semin Nephrol. 1990;10:491–500.
Frank A, Rauen U, de Groot H. Protection by glycine against hypoxic injury of rat hepatocytes: inhibition of ion fluxes through nonspecific leaks. J Hepatol. 2000;32:58–66.
Jacob T, Ascher E, Hingorani A, Kallakuri S. Glycine prevents the induction of apoptosis attributed to mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat model. Surgery. 2003;134:457–66.
Nishimura Y, Lemasters JJ. Glycine blocks opening of a death channel in cultured hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells during chemical hypoxia. Cell Death Differ. 2001;8:850–8.
Zhang K, Weinberg JM, Venkatachalam MA, Dong Z. Glycine protection of PC-12 cells against injury by ATP depletion. Neurochem Res. 2003;28:893–901.
Zhong Z, Jones S, Thurman RG. Glycine minimizes reperfusion injury in a low-flow, reflow liver perfusion model in the rat. Am J Phys. 1996;270:G332–8.
Dong Z, Patel Y, Saikumar P, Weinberg JM, Venkatachalam MA. Development of porous defects in plasma membranes of adenosine triphosphate-depleted Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and its inhibition by glycine. Lab Investig. 1998;78:657–68.
Rauen U, de Groot H. Mammalian cell injury induced by hypothermia—the emerging role for reactive oxygen species. Biol Chem. 2002;383:477–88.
Rauen U, Polzar B, Stephan H, Mannherz HG, de Groot H. Cold-induced apoptosis in cultured hepatocytes and liver endothelial cells: mediation by reactive oxygen species. FASEB J. 1999;13:155–68.
Rauen U, de Groot H. New insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cold storage injury. J Investig Med. 2004;52:299–309.
Salahudeen AK, Huang H, Joshi M, Moore NA, Jenkins JK. Involvement of the mitochondrial pathway in cold storage and rewarming-associated apoptosis of human renal proximal tubular cells. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:273–80.
Salahudeen AK. Cold ischemic injury of transplanted kidneys: new insights from experimental studies. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;287:F181–7.
Rauen U, Petrat F, Li T, de Groot H. Hypothermia injury/cold-induced apoptosis—evidence of an increase in chelatable iron causing oxidative injury in spite of low O2 −/H2O2 formation. FASEB J. 2000;14:1953–64.
Huang H, Salahudeen AK. Cold induces catalytic iron release of cytochrome P-450 origin: a critical step in cold storage-induced renal injury. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:631–9.
Huang H, He Z, LJn R, Salahudeen AK. Deferoxamine reduces cold-ischemic renal injury in a syngeneic kidney transplant model. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:1531–7.
Rauen U, Klempt S, de Groot H. Histidine-induced injury to cultured liver cells, effects of histidine derivatives and of iron chelators. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:192–205.
Valero R, García-Valdecasas JC, Net M, Beltran J, Ordi J, González FX, López-Boado MA, Almenara R, Taurá P, Elena M, Capdevila L, Manyalich M, Visa J. L-arginine reduces liver and biliary tract damage after liver transplantation from non-heart-beating-donor pigs. Transplantation. 2000;70:730–7.
Geller DA, Chia SH, Takahashi Y, Yagnik GP, Tsoulfas G, Murase N. Protective role of the L-arginine-nitric oxide synthase pathway on preservation injury after rat liver transplantation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001;25:142–7.
Podesser BK, Hallström S. Nitric oxide homeostasis as a target for drug additives to cardioplegia. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151:930–40.
Lefer AM, Lefer DJ. The role of nitric oxide and cell adhesion molecules on the microcirculation in ischemia-reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32:743–51.
Belzer FO, Southard JH. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation. 1988;45:673–6.
Gores GJ, Nieminen AL, Fleishman KE, Dawson TL, Herman B, Lemasters JJ. Extracellular acidosis delays onset of cell death in ATP-depleted hepatocytes. Am J Phys. 1988;255:C315–22.
Gores GJ, Nieminen AL, Wray BE, Herman B, Lemasters JJ. Intracellular pH during “chemical hypoxia” in cultured rat hepatocytes: protection by intracellular acidosis against the onset of cell death. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:386–96.
Pless G, Sauer IM, Rauen U. Improvement of the cold storage of isolated human hepatocytes. Cell Transpl. 2012;21:23–37.
Schröder C, Heintz A, Pexa A, Rauen U, Deussen A. Preclinical evaluation of coronary vascular function after cardioplegia with HTK and different antioxidant additives. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:822–7.
Liu Q, Bruns H, Schultze D, Xue Y, Zorn M, Flechtenmacher C, Straub BK, Rauen U, Schemmer P. HTK-N, a modified HTK solution, decreases preservation injury in a model of microsteatotic rat liver transplantation. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2012;397:1323–31. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e-6-r2-guideline-good-clinical-practice-step-5_en.pdf.
O’Callaghan JM, Knight SR, Morgan RD, Morris PJ. Preservation solutions for static cold storage of kidney allografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplantat. 2012;12(4):896–906.
The authors thank J. Hüsing, S. Gack, C. Klose, and Dr. Franz Köhler Chemie GmbH, for their support with the study protocol.
Role of sponsor and funders
Sponsor: Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2, 8036 Graz. The role of study sponsors and funders does not include the following: study design, management and data collection plus analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the report for publication.
Funding has been provided by Dr. Franz Köhler Chemie GmbH, Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 14–28, D-64625 Bensheim, Germany.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study has gained ethical approval at both central and local levels. Central ethical approval has been confirmed from Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universität Graz no. 30-385ex17/18 and we will not begin recruiting at other centres in the trial until local ethical approval has been obtained. The application for ethics approval has been sent to the local ethics committee; ethics approval has been received on 5 October 2018. Any patient included in this study has to sign an informed consent. The informed consent form is available from the corresponding author on request.
Consent for publication
All authors give consent for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kniepeiss, D., Houben, P., Stiegler, P. et al. A prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicentre, phase III study on organ preservation with Custodiol-N solution compared with Custodiol® solution in organ transplantation (kidney, liver and pancreas). Trials 21, 62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3823-4
- Preservation solution
- Liver transplantation
- Kidney transplantation
- Pancreatic transplantation