Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness of the KENKOJISEICHI local revitalization system on cognitive function change in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials201819:276

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2642-3

Received: 18 September 2017

Accepted: 11 April 2018

Published: 11 May 2018

Abstract

Background

Physical activity is associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline in older adults. However, past studies have demonstrated that older adults tend to relapse into inactivity after completing interventions. This ongoing study employs a randomized controlled trial design to assess the efficacy and efficiency of the KENKOJISEICHI local revitalization system for promoting daily outdoor behaviors to improve cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Methods/design

This 6-month randomized controlled trial will include 83 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older with MCI. Participants will be randomized to the KENKOJISEICHI experimental group or an educational control group. The KENKOJISEICHI group will receive a 90-minute session twice per week that consists of social, intellectual, and physical activities involving outdoor behaviors intended to support cognitive function. Participants in the educational control group will attend two 120-minute educational classes during the 6-month trial period. Considering a 20–30% dropout rate, a sample size of 35 participants per group is required.

Discussion

If the program successfully promotes long-term habitual outdoor behaviors, this will expand knowledge regarding how to support social, intellectual, and physical activities, as well as communication change, among the older population to provide them with cognitive benefits.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan, UMIN000026479. Registered on 9 March 2017.

Keywords

Cognitive activityDementiaOlder adultPhysical activitySocial activityOutdoor behavior

Background

In mild cognitive impairment (MCI), several clinical and neuropsychological pathological features are present prior to the onset of overt Alzheimer’s disease [1]. Epidemiological data suggest that physical activity (PA) is associated with a lower risk of dementia [2], and many studies have identified the effects of exercise or PA on cognitive function in older adults with MCI [35]. Not surprisingly, there has been a sudden increase of interest in cognitive training and cognitive exercise interventions that can slow or reverse such changes or mitigate their detrimental effects [6].

Cognitive training and cognitive exercise interventions, involving guided practice of specific cognitive tasks, and cognitive stimulation programs, aimed at enhancing general cognitive functioning, have been offered to prevent or minimize the effects of cognitive aging. The effects of such cognitive interventions were investigated not only in healthy older adults but also in people with cognitive deterioration beyond normal age-dependent changes, such as people with MCI [68]. However, poor exercise adherence may be the most essential issue that hinders acquisition of health benefits and success of health promotion policies. Approximately 48% of older adults are reported to cease exercising within 6 months of initiation of an exercise program [9], subsequently leading to the loss of training effects [10].

Various studies have investigated factors that affect cognitive function and the development of dementia. In this context, the term social participation is used in a broad sense relating to society. Older adults with high levels of social participation are considered to have higher cognitive functioning than those with low levels of social participation [1115]. In addition, social networks such as those related to work and volunteerism, as well as to friends and family, have been reported to exert a functional and protective effect with respect to dementia in older adults [14, 16]. Thus, it is possible that activity and cognitive function could be maintained by increasing social network involvement, such as with friends and family.

KENKOJISEICHI refers to a combination of health and self-employment, network development within one’s town, and a system of using neighborhood amenities such as stores, shops, cafes, supermarkets, libraries, community centers, and sports gyms in Takahama city, Aichi, Japan. We developed a structured program based on this concept, which combines physical, cognitive, and social activity promotion approaches with community resources for older adults. The program specifically focuses on helping participants to develop “continuous activities” based on enjoyment. These favorite activities include those that are physical, social, and intellectual, and involve participation in the community. Although such coordinated approaches have the potential to achieve substantial health promotion among the older population, they have not been adequately examined using randomized controlled trials. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the KENKOJISEICHI local revitalization system for promoting daily outdoor behaviors to improve cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults with MCI through a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Methods/design

Design and setting

The study design is a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. The 6-month-long study employs two groups: the KENKOJISEICHI course group and an educational control group. The study design and setting are shown in Fig. 1. This study will be conducted in Takahama city, Aichi, Japan. We have been conducting an observational study, including face-to-face interviews and measures of physical and cognitive function, in this community since 2015.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Intervention schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines proposed in the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG), Japan (approval no. 861-2). The protocol was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000026479). We held a meeting for all potential participants to explain the study purpose, measurements, and design, as well as to obtain written informed consent.

Participants

A flow diagram of study participants is presented in Fig. 2. The study participants include community-dwelling older adults who were part of a subcohort of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology–Study of Geriatrics Syndromes, conducted in Takahama from 2015 to 2016. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) aged 65 years or older; (2) not care-dependent or support-dependent on the Japanese long-term care insurance system; (3) independent in basic activities of daily living; (4) no diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, dementia, or depression; (5) not restricted from exercising by a doctor; (6) no pacemaker; (7) not a KENKOJISEICHI administrator; (8) not going out every day according to the Life-Space Assessment (LSA; 1 km–10 km); (9) not employed; and (10) without MCI (amnestic MCI and nonamnestic MCI). Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) no attendance at orientation, (2) consent not provided, (3) death or moving without notice, (4) not a participant in the preintervention assessment, (5) disability, and (6) severe health problems at baseline assessment. All of the participants read and signed the informed written consent form that was approved by the institutional review board for testing.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Flowchart of the study participants

Sample size

The required sample size for this study was calculated using predictions of 6-month changes in NCGG Functional Assessment Tool (NCGG-FAT) results. On the basis of results of our previous work, we predicted that a change of 2.0 points would indicate a difference [17, 18]. To detect such a difference, with a power of 80% and alpha error of 5%, and considering a 20–30% dropout rate, a sample size of 35 participants per group was required.

Randomization

After the baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to the KENKOJISEICHI group or an educational control group. A researcher who is unaware of the aims of the study will perform the randomization procedure using computer-generated random numbers and will send the assignments to a researcher. Then, this researcher will notify the participants by mail. They will be told that they can stop the intervention at any time. They will also be asked to maintain their usual activities and to not participate in other research projects related to exercise or physical interventions.

Planned trial interventions

KENKOJISEICHI group

The KENKOJISEICHI group will participate in classes focusing on 101 outdoor behaviors, including 28 physical activities, 29 intellectual activities, and 44 social activities; a small group gathering meeting will also be available. Locations that meet at least two of the following five examination requirements will be certified as healthy places: (1) places where KENKOJISEICHI group members can participate as they choose and can carry out activities with a purpose, (2) places where they can participate lightly, (3) places where people can interact with other people in the community, (4) places where the chosen activity can be performed, and (5) places where relaxation and relief can be realized. Nevertheless, a site that is used for political or religious activities or for the purpose of promoting these activities will not be recognized for KENKOUJISECHI purposes.

Social activities will be conducted in a community network and will include events such as traditional and health festivals, as well as visiting a cafeteria, drug store, shopping mall, temple, sightseeing spot, senior’s club, or variety store. Cognitive activities will include visiting a library, singing karaoke, playing the Japanese game Go, reminiscing (life review), arts and crafts, doing calligraphy, video impression, creating stamp art, and visiting an art museum. Physical activities will include Tai Chi, machine studio, indoor golf, walking, muscle strength training, stretch, hula dance, traditional dance, boccia, and social dance.

The intervention program consists of participating in social (16 times), intellectual (16 times), and physical activities (16 times). The forty-eight 90-minute sessions take place twice per week over 24 weeks and include a 15-minute condition check and stretching; 60 minutes of social activity, intellectual activity, or PA; and 15 minutes to write a report, provide impressions, and discuss the upcoming schedule. Participants will be divided into nine groups with two to four participants and two to three staff members in each group. The staff will manage the schedule, check health during participation, and prepare reports. This program focuses on improving outdoor behaviors and communication; therefore, it was designed to be simple and performed at any location in order to facilitate long-term adherence for all participants.

Participants will choose their next KENKOJISEICHI location by talking with the staff and through group-based activities (Table 1). The participants will record their impressions about the content of each day’s activity. Then, staff will write a brief activity report and note feedback from participants.
Table 1

KENKOJISEICHI curriculum

 

One time

Two time

Three time

Four time

Five time

Six time

Seven time

Eight time

A group

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

B group

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

C group

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

D group

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

E group

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

F group

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

G group

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

H group

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

I group

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Social refers to social activity, physical refers to physical activity, and intellectual refers to intellectual activity

Educational control group

Participants in the educational control group will attend two 90-minute educational classes during the 6-month trial period. The classes will taught by experts on topics considered less likely to influence cognition and PA (e.g., nutrition, pain, and oral care).

Data collection

Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at postintervention (Table 2). Assessment, data entry, and data analysis will be performed by a different researcher blind to group allocation and not involved in delivering the interventions.
Table 2

List of measurements collected at preintervention and postintervention assessments

Category

 

Measurement

Primary outcome

 

National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Functional Assessment Tool (NCGG-FAT)

Secondary outcomes

Neuroimaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (whole-brain and hippocampal volume)

Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

Quantity of talk (Silmee W20 monitor)

Physical function

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; balance, side-by-side stand, semitandem, and tandem tests; gait speed; 2.4-m usual pace walk test; and lower extremity strength chair stand test)

Trail walking test (TWT)

Handgrip strength

Physical activity

Triaxial accelerometer (modified GT40-020)

Other outcomes

Self-reported health status interview

International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

Kihon Checklist (KCL)

Life-Space Assessment (LSA)

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ)

5-Item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence (JST-IC)

Subjective memory complaints (SMCs)

Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version (HHIE-S)

Health-related factors

Diseases diagnosed, prescribed medications, blood pressure, smoking status, alcohol intake, living-alone status, outing frequency, falls, fall-related injuries, fear of falling, urinary incontinence, habitual exercise, habitual activity, mobility limitation, hearing aids, vision, walking aids, pain, talking, talking time, outdoor activities, self-efficacy, outdoor social support, self-cognition, quality of life, basic activities of daily living (BADL)

Body composition and anthropometry

Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (body fat and muscle volumes)

Body weight and height

Primary outcome

The primary outcome measure is cognitive function at the 6-month postintervention assessment. Cognitive function will be assessed using the NCGG-FAT [19, 20], a multidimensional neurocognitive test, to assess memory (word list memory-I: immediate recognition; word list memory-II: delayed recall), attention and executive function (electronic tablet version of the Trail Making Test A and B), processing speed (electronic tablet version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test), and visuospatial function (original version of the NCGG-FAT). High test-retest reliability and moderate to high validity were confirmed in community-dwelling older adults for all task components of the NCGG-FAT.

Secondary outcomes

Secondary outcomes will be brain and hippocampal volume, mental status, and depressive symptoms, which can potentially explain the mechanisms of the effects of the KENKOJISEICHI activities on the primary outcome. Whole-brain and hippocampal volume will be determined using a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging system (TM Trio; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Three-dimensional volumetric acquisition of T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences will be performed to produce a gapless series of thin sagittal sections using a magnetization preparation rapid-acquisition gradient-echo sequence (inversion time [TI] 800 milliseconds, repetition time [TR] 1800 milliseconds, echo time [TE] 1.99 milliseconds, and 1.1-mm slice thickness). Axial T2-weighted spin-echo images (TR 4200 milliseconds, TE 89.0 milliseconds, and 5.0-mm slice thickness) and axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (TI 2500 milliseconds, TR 9000 milliseconds, TE 100 milliseconds, and 5-mm slice thickness) will then be obtained for diagnosis.

Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale [21], which is a self-report screening tool developed to detect depression in older adults. The responses to the 15-item questionnaire will be scored, with scores of 0–4 defined as normal, 5–10 as mildly depressed, and 11–15 as severely depressed [22, 23]. A total score ≥ 5 points is considered to indicate depressive symptoms.

Quantity of talk will be measured using a biosensor device (Silmee™W20; TDK Co., Ltd., Chiba, Japan) for continuous monitoring of the volume of talk. All of the participants will be asked to wear the biosensor over their right wrist for 14 days following their examination while outdoors, except while swimming or bathing, and to maintain their usual activities.

PA will be measured using a triaxial accelerometer (modified HW-100; Kao Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for continuous monitoring of the intensity of PA. We will calculate parametric values, including the weekly average, for the daily amounts of light-intensity PA (1.5–2.9 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and moderate to vigorous PA (≥ 3.0 METs). The data will be recorded in 4-second epochs for up to 1 day and will be collected using the KAO system installed at the KENKOJISEICHI. The display of the accelerometer will be blinded. For inclusion in the present study, a valid day will be defined as a day in which the accelerometer is worn for ≥ 10 hours, with a total wear duration ≥ 7 days.

Participants in our study will perform three physical function tests. First, the Short Physical Performance Battery is used to measure balance, gait speed, and lower extremity strength [24]. The total score as well as each component score is related to the degree of disability, and these scores are strongly associated with mortality and hospital admission. Second, in the trail walking test, flags are installed randomly at each of 15 positions [25]. Third, handgrip strength will be measured using a handheld dynamometer (T.K.K. 5401 GRIP D; Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan), with participants in a standing position with their arms hanging naturally at their sides [26].

Other outcomes

The participants will complete a self-report health status interview to provide information on a variety of health-related factors. PA will be measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire [27]. Low, moderate, and high levels of PA will be calculated on the basis of METs for different activities. Basic health will be measured using the Kihon Checklist (KCL) [28]. The KCL consists of 25 items with 6 subscales, including activities of daily living (5 items), physical ability (5 items), nutrition (2 items), oral condition (3 items), seclusion (2 items), forgetfulness (3 items), and mind (5 items). Life-space mobility will be measured with the LSA [29], which is used to obtain a score based on the reported distance traveled during the 4 weeks preceding assessment. Sleep quality will be evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [30], which consists of 19 items that produce a global sleep quality score and scores for 7 components (sleep quality, latency, duration, disturbance, habitual sleep efficiency, use of soporific medication, and daytime dysfunction). Simple nutritional evaluation tools will include the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire [31], which contains 15 items for hospitalized patients and has some items that are most useful for outpatient weight loss, loss of appetite, and use of nutritional supplements and/or tube feeding. Mental health will be measured with the Japanese version of the five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, which is a short global rating scale used to measure subjective well-being [32]. The respondent is asked to rate how well each of the five statements applies to him or her when considering the last 14 days. Instrumental activities of daily living evaluation tools will include the Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence (JST-IC) [33]. The JST-IC is a modified version of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence. Cognitive health will be assessed using subjective memory complaints (SMCs) [34]. SMCs combine the Cambridge Mental Disorders of the Elderly Examination questionnaire and the SMC scale. Hearing screening will be conducted using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version (HHIE-S) [35]. The HHIE-S is a ten-item questionnaire developed to assess how an individual perceives the social and emotional effects of hearing loss.

Health-related factors

Health-related factors that will be assessed through questionnaires will include blood pressure, medical history, medications, education, smoking status, alcohol intake, whether living alone, outing frequency, self-health status, falls, fall-related injuries, fear of falling, urinary incontinence, habitual exercise, mobility limitations, use of a hearing aid, vision, use of a walking aid, pain, talking, talking time, outdoor self-efficacy, and outdoor social support.

Body composition and anthropometry

Body composition and anthropometric measurements will include body weight, and fat and muscle volumes will be measured using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MC-980A; TANITA Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Height will also be measured.

Statistical analysis

The data will be double-entered to enable validation. A coauthor, blinded to group allocation, will conduct preplanned statistical analyses for the primary and secondary outcomes. To ensure blinding, he will have no contact with the participants and use random numbers for group allocation. Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied to the outcome variables. Missing data will be imputed with the multiple imputation method [36]. Characteristics will be compared between groups using chi-square tests for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Mixed-model analysis of variance will be carried out to test the effects of group, time, and the group × time interaction for all functional fitness tests. p Values < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses will be performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Discussion

Over one billion people, approximately 15% of the world’s population, are estimated to have some form of disability. These rates are increasing because of an expanding aging population and increases in chronic health conditions such as dementia [37]. Cognitive impairment may be associated with disability in older adults [38]. In this study, we will use a randomized controlled trial design to examine the effectiveness of the KENKOJISEICHI daily outdoor behaviors intervention in community-dwelling older adults with MCI. We hypothesize that participants in the KENKOJISEICHI group will maintain significantly higher cognition at the 6-month follow-up than the educational control group. Based on the transtheoretical model of outdoor behavior change, while cognitive training and cognitive exercise can shift people in the preparation and contemplation stages to the action stage, the outdoor behaviors support program is expected to guide participants to the maintenance stage, which is the essential stage for obtaining enduring health benefits from cognition.

Even during the outdoor behavior support period, older participants may return to an inactive lifestyle because of obstacles such as undesirable weather conditions, health issues, and family and community special events. The outdoor behaviors support program is designed to assist group activity, help them reflect upon issues arising, and help the group come up with its own ideas to overcome such issues. In addition to quantitative assessments of mediating social, psychological, and physiological factors, qualitative assessments focusing on self and group habitual activity will clarify how the outdoor behaviors support program will affect maintaining outdoor behaviors in participants’ daily lives.

If the outdoor behaviors support program successfully promotes maintenance of cognition and physical function, this will expand knowledge regarding supporting change in outdoor behaviors among the older population to obtain health benefits related to cognition. Moreover, the effective and less costly outdoor behaviors programs will be useful in creating a more meaningful and sustainable community-based network.

Trial status

At the time of manuscript submission, we had obtained ethical approval, registered the trial, and successfully recruited participants. The intervention is in progress (Additional file 1).

Abbreviations

GDS: 

Geriatric Depression Scale

HHIE-S: 

Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening Version

ITT: 

Intention to treat

JST-IC: 

Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence

KCL: 

Kihon Checklist

LSA: 

Life-Space Assessment

MCI: 

Mild cognitive impairment

MET: 

Metabolic equivalents

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

NCGG-FAT: 

National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Functional Assessment Tool

PA: 

Physical activity

SMC: 

Subjective memory complaints

SPPB: 

Short Physical Performance Battery

TE: 

Echo time

TI: 

Inversion time

TR: 

Repetition time

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Takahama office of Kao Corporation and our staff members for help with subject recruitment.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (no. 26242059) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Availability of data and materials

We do not wish to share our data or materials, because they contain confidential information and we plan to continuously add to the dataset.

Authors’ contributions

SJ managed the exercise intervention and drafted the manuscript. HS conceived the study and acquired research resources. ScL managed the exercise intervention. SJ, ScL, SB, SyL, KM, YS and HS participated in the study design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. SJ and ScL managed the physical activity system. SJ, ScL, SB, and SyL took responsibility for the research ethics and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan. All participants gave their informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
(2)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Cummings JL, DeKosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, Delacourte A, Frisoni G, Fox NC, Galasko D, et al. Revising the definition of Alzheimer’s disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(11):1118–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Larson EB, Wang L, Bowen JD, McCormick WC, Teri L, Crane P, Kukull W. Exercise is associated with reduced risk for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(2):73–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker LD, Frank LL, Foster-Schubert K, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, McTiernan A, Plymate SR, Fishel MA, Watson GS, Cholerton BA, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise on mild cognitive impairment: a controlled trial. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(1):71–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Scherder EJ, Van Paasschen J, Deijen JB, Van Der Knokke S, Orlebeke JF, Burgers I, Devriese PP, Swaab DF, Sergeant JA. Physical activity and executive functions in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9(3):272–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lautenschlager NT, Cox KL, Flicker L, Foster JK, van Bockxmeer FM, Xiao J, Greenop KR, Almeida OP. Effect of physical activity on cognitive function in older adults at risk for Alzheimer disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1027–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lustig C, Shah P, Seidler R, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Aging, training, and the brain: a review and future directions. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19(4):504–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Valenzuela M, Sachdev P. Can cognitive exercise prevent the onset of dementia? Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(3):179–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reijnders J, van Heugten C, van Boxtel M. Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):263–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morey MC, Pieper CF, Crowley GM, Sullivan RJ, Puglisi CM. Exercise adherence and 10-year mortality in chronically ill older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):1929–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosquet L, Berryman N, Dupuy O, Mekary S, Arvisais D, Bherer L, Mujika I. Effect of training cessation on muscular performance: a meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(3):e140–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnes LL, Mendes de Leon CF, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Evans DA. Social resources and cognitive decline in a population of older African Americans and whites. Neurology. 2004;63(12):2322–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bassuk SS, Glass TA, Berkman LF. Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(3):165–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beland F, Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado B, Otero A, Del Ser T. Trajectories of cognitive decline and social relations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60(6):P320–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Holtzman RE, Rebok GW, Saczynski JS, Kouzis AC, Wilcox Doyle K, Eaton WW. Social network characteristics and cognition in middle-aged and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004;59(6):P278–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado BE, Del Ser T, Otero A. Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58(2):S93–S100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang HX, Karp A, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(12):1081–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Makizako H, Doi T, Shimada H, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Uemura K, Suzuki T. Does a multicomponent exercise program improve dual-task performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment? A randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(6):640–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, Uemura K, Lee S, Park H. Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:128.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, Uemura K, Ito T, Lee S, Park H, et al. Combined prevalence of frailty and mild cognitive impairment in a population of elderly Japanese people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(7):518–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Makizako H, Shimada H, Park H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Uemura K, Tsutsumimoto K, Suzuki T. Evaluation of multidimensional neurocognitive function using a tablet personal computer: test-retest reliability and validity in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(4):860–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):709–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyness JM, Noel TK, Cox C, King DA, Conwell Y, Caine ED. Screening for depression in elderly primary care patients: a comparison of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression Scale and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(4):449–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. van Marwijk HW, Wallace P, de Bock GH, Hermans J, Kaptein AA, Mulder JD. Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(393):195–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamada M, Ichihashi N. Predicting the probability of falls in community-dwelling elderly individuals using the trail-walking test. Environ Health Prev Med. 2010;15(6):386–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Shinkai S, Kumagai S, Fujiwara Y, Amano H, Yoshida Y, Watanabe S, Ishizaki T, Suzuki T, Shibata H. Predictors for the onset of functional decline among initially non-disabled older people living in a community during a 6-year follow-up. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2003;3(s1):S31–9.Google Scholar
  27. Tomioka K, Iwamoto J, Saeki K, Okamoto N. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in elderly adults: the Fujiwara-kyo Study. J Epidemiol. 2011;21(6):459–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsutsui T, Muramatsu N. Japan’s universal long-term care system reform of 2005: containing costs and realizing a vision. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(9):1458–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(11):1610–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Doi Y, Minowa M, Uchiyama M, Okawa M, Kim K, Shibui K, Kamei Y. Psychometric assessment of subjective sleep quality using the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-J) in psychiatric disordered and control subjects. Psychiatry Res. 2000;97(2-3):165–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kruizenga HM, Seidell JC, de Vet HC, Wierdsma NJ, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutrition: the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ). Clin Nutr. 2005;24(1):75–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Iwasa H, Masui Y, Inagaki H, Yoshida Y, Shimada H, Otsuka R, Kikuchi K, Nonaka K, Yoshida H, Yoshida H, et al. Development of the Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence to assess functional capacity in older adults: conceptual definitions and preliminary items. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2015;1:2333721415609490.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsutsumimoto K, Makizako H, Doi T, Hotta R, Nakakubo S, Makino K, Shimada H, Suzuki T. Subjective memory complaints are associated with incident dementia in cognitively intact older people, but not in those with cognitive impairment: a 24-month prospective cohort study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25(6):607–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983;25(7):37–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Little RJ, D’Agostino R, Cohen ML, Dickersin K, Emerson SS, Farrar JT, Frangakis C, Hogan JW, Molenberghs G, Murphy SA, et al. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1355–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization. Disability and health. Fact sheet 352. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/. Accessed 9 Jun 2017.
  38. Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Amaducci L, Maggi S, Grigoletto F, Scarlato G, Inzitari D. Cognitive impairment without dementia in older people: prevalence, vascular risk factors, impact on disability: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(7):775–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement