Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual for at-risk mental states (NAYAB): study protocol

  • Inti Qurashi1, 2,
  • Imran B. Chaudhry2,
  • Ameer B. Khoso3,
  • Sana Farooque3,
  • Steve Lane4,
  • Mohammad Omair Husain5,
  • Simon Chu1, 6Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Jane Sarginson2,
  • Munir Hamarani7,
  • Haider A. Naqvi8,
  • Bushra Razzaque9,
  • Fareed A. Minhas9,
  • Alison R. Yung2,
  • J. F. W. Deakin2 and
  • Nusrat Husain2
Trials201718:524

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2275-y

Received: 26 May 2017

Accepted: 27 September 2017

Published: 9 November 2017

Abstract

Background

The at-risk mental state (ARMS) describes individuals at high risk of developing schizophrenia or psychosis. The use of antipsychotics in this population is not supported, because most individuals with ARMS are unlikely to develop psychosis. Anti-inflammatory treatments and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may have some beneficial effects in the treatment of ARMS. There have been no controlled clinical trials in which researchers have investigated the use of minocycline for ARMS and no trials involving PUFAs in combination with other proposed treatments. There is a need to find effective, tolerable and inexpensive interventions for individuals with ARMS that are available in high-, low- and middle-income countries.

Methods/design

A 6-month intervention study of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with ARMS will be conducted in Pakistan using a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind factorial design. A total of 320 consenting patients with capacity will be recruited from the community, general practitioner clinics and psychiatric units. Allowing for a 25% dropout rate, we will recruit 59 completing participants into each study arm, and in total 236 will complete the study. We will determine whether the addition of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids to TAU attenuates the rate of transition from ARMS to first-episode psychosis and improves symptoms and/or level of functioning in ARMS. We will also investigate whether any candidate risk factors, such as negative symptoms, influence treatment response in the ARMS group. The primary efficacy endpoint is conversion to psychotic disorder at 12 months after study entry. Analysis will be done according to the intention to treat principle using analysis of variance, chi-square tests and adjusted ORs to assess between-group differences. Cox regression analysis will be used to evaluate potential between-group differences in time to onset of psychosis.

Discussion

The outcomes of this trial will provide evidence of the potential benefits of minocycline and PUFAs in the treatment of ARMS. Both minocycline and PUFAs are inexpensive, are readily available in low-/middle-income countries such as Pakistan, and if proven, may be safe and effective for treating individuals with ARMS.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02569307. Registered on 3 October 2015.

Keywords

MinocyclineOmega-3 fatty acidsPUFAAt-risk mental state (ARMS)Ultra-high risk (UHR) schizophreniaGlobal mental health

Background

The at-risk mental state (ARMS) describes individuals at increased risk of developing psychosis. Operationalised criteria have been developed to identify young persons with ARMS [1]. Authors of a meta-analysis of 27 studies with a combined sample of 2500 subjects reported a transition to psychosis rate of 18% at 6 months, rising to 22% at 1 year [2]. These studies were undertaken in Europe, the United States and Australia, and transition rates are likely to be higher, approaching 40%, in countries with less-established mental health care systems [3]. Individuals who experience symptoms of ARMS are mostly help-seeking [4], making it a critical period during which an intervention could be delivered to prevent conversion to psychosis, improve symptoms and reduce distress. Most of the disability develops before the onset of frank psychosis [5], and earlier treatment of psychosis is linked to better outcomes [6].

Interventions tested for ARMS include antipsychotics [7] and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) [8]. The use of antipsychotics in this population is not supported in, for example, national clinical guidance [9], because a large proportion of individuals with ARMS are unlikely to develop psychosis. Furthermore, antipsychotics can cause side effects such as weight gain and other metabolic disturbances. An alternative approach is to explore the effectiveness of interventions within a clinically staged approach where the earlier in the course of illness treatment is offered, the safer and more tolerable it should be compared with treatments used later in the illness, whilst remaining effective in terms of remission and recovery rates [10].

There is persuasive evidence to test the use of minocycline in individuals with ARMS. Authors of a meta-analysis of minocycline augmentation of antipsychotics pooled the results of four randomised controlled trials including young adults in the early phase of schizophrenia [11] and found that minocycline was superior to placebo in reducing total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the PANSS negative subscale, and the PANSS general subscale. Minocycline was equivalent to placebo for all-cause discontinuation and for discontinuation because of adverse events. In addition, minocycline has a well-established effectiveness and safety profile in adolescents and young adults [12].

Authors of three systematic reviews [1315] of interventions in the ARMS group found that antipsychotics, CBT and omega-3 fatty acids may have some effect on preventing or delaying the onset of psychosis, but all of these authors noted the need for ongoing research. A replication study of omega-3 fatty acids with a larger sample would be especially important, given that this treatment is relatively safe and has few health risks in a drug-naïve population that could gain other potential benefits (such as improving cardiovascular status). In a subsequent study to determine whether omega-3 fatty acids in combination with a high-quality psychosocial intervention, cognitive behavioural case management (CBCM), was more effective than placebo plus CBCM, researchers did not detect a difference in transition to psychosis at 6 months [16]. However, the lower-than-expected transition rate may have prevented a test of the main hypothesis, and the substantial symptomatic and functional improvement in both groups with the other treatments received (i.e., CBCM and antidepressants) is likely to have produced a ceiling effect beyond which omega-3 fatty acids, even if effective, could not be shown to confer additional benefits. Neither CBT nor CBCM is widely available in low- and middle-income countries, unlike nutritional supplements and antibiotics.

In summary, there is a need to find effective, tolerable, inexpensive and safe interventions for individuals with ARMS, especially in view of the lack of availability of high-quality psychosocial interventions in low-/middle-income countries. Using a factorial design, we will compare placebo with minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids alone, as well as in combination, in the treatment of individuals with ARMS in Pakistan. The novel aspects of this trial include that (1) minocycline has not been tested as a treatment for individuals with ARMS, (2) minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids have not previously been tested in combination and potentially have additive/synergistic effects due to their modes of action, and (3) no drug trials for ARMS have been undertaken in Pakistan or similar low- and middle-income countries.

Methods/design

Objectives

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids in individuals with ARMS and specifically to determine whether the addition of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids to treatment as usual (TAU) in an operationalised ARMS population in Pakistan (1) attenuates the rate or incidence of transition from ARMS to first-episode psychosis and (2) improves symptoms and/or level of functioning of individuals with ARMS. In addition, we will explore whether candidate risk factors, such as negative symptoms, socio-demographic characteristics and neurobiological variables, including metabolic parameters (such as erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and, where possible, cytokines), influence the transition to psychosis in the ARMS group.

Study design

We are conducting a 6-month intervention study of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to TAU in patients with ARMS, using a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind factorial design. In practice, TAU in this population in Pakistan comprises no specific treatment, whether psychological or pharmacological. Participants will be randomly assigned to either (1) placebo, (2) minocycline, (3) omega-3 fatty acids or (4) minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids in combination. Blinding will be maintained because participants will receive equivalent numbers of tablets. In a factorial design the objective is generally not to compare arms with each other; instead, combinations of experimental conditions are compared. Each experimental condition in a factorial design represents a different treatment protocol. It allows a test of the possibility that the interventions being tested have additive or multiplicative benefits.

Primary outcome measure

The primary efficacy endpoint will be transition to psychotic disorder at 12 months after study entry. Transition is operationally defined using the positive symptom subscales in the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS) [17] as one of the following:
  • Unusual thought content held with delusional intensity (global score 6) occurring several times or more per week (frequency and duration score > 3)

  • Non-bizarre ideas held with delusional conviction (global score 6) occurring several times or more per week (frequency and duration score > 3)

  • Perceptual abnormalities in any modality (global score ≥ 5) occurring several times or more per week (frequency and duration score > 3)

  • Disorganised speech (global score ≥ 5) occurring several times or more per week (frequency and duration score > 4)

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary outcome measures are as follows:
  • Change in severity of ARMS symptoms between entry (baseline) assessment and at 3, 6 and 12 months measured as difference in scores on the CAARMS

  • Change in social and occupational functioning between baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months measured using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) [18]

  • Change in cognitive scores between baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months measured using the CogState battery [19]

  • Adverse effects of medications: proportion developing adverse effects as a function of severity

  • Treatment with antipsychotic medication (from participant self-report and subsequent confirmation by clinician or by prescription evidence), because this is likely to correlate with conversion to psychosis

  • Change in severity of depressive symptoms between entry at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months measured as the difference in scores on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [20]

Sample size

Sample size estimates are based on the expected transition rate to psychosis of 30%, and, on the basis of previous research, we expect to achieve a clinically meaningful reduction to 15% [21, 22] following treatment with minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids. With 80% power and at a 5% significance level, we will require a sample size of 59 per treatment arm to detect the expected difference. We are allowing for a drop-out rate of 25%, and in order to maintain 59 completing participants per arm, we will recruit 80 participants to each of the 4 trial arms. Therefore, we intend to recruit 320 participants in total.

Study participants

Inclusion criteria

Participants should fulfil all of the following criteria:
  • Male or female individuals aged 16–35 years

  • Meet the criteria for ARMS using CAARMS operationalised intake criteria based on three groups (vulnerability, attenuated psychosis, or brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms group)

  • Assessed as competent to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Individuals meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
  • A history of psychotic illness (treated or untreated)

  • IQ < 70 and/or a history of learning disability

  • Any pre-existing inflammatory conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)

  • Organic brain disease (e.g., epilepsy)

  • Previous treatment with an antipsychotic or mood-stabilising agent

  • Prior history of intolerance or serious side effects (hepatotoxicity, photosensitivity, blood dyscrasia) of any of the tetracyclines or omega-3 fatty acids

  • Concomitant penicillin therapy or concomitant anticoagulant therapy

  • Active substance abuse (except nicotine or caffeine) or dependence within the last 3 months, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria

  • Treatment with warfarin or lamotrigine

  • Current or previous treatment with tetracycline antibiotics or omega-3 fatty acids in the 3 months before study entry

  • Current treatment with any anti-inflammatory medication

  • Treatment with electroconvulsive therapy within the 12 weeks preceding the study

  • Active expression of suicidal ideation or current aggressive/dangerous behaviour

  • Relevant current or past hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), might interfere with the study

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

Withdrawal criteria

Participants may be withdrawn from the research study for the following reasons:
  • At their own request

  • At the discretion of the investigator

  • Participants who meet the exit criteria for transition to psychosis or develop mania

  • Experiencing a serious adverse event or moderate to severe adverse drug reaction

  • Participants meeting criteria for insufficient adherence, defined as either taking < 75% of trial medication between assessment points at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months or missing trial medications altogether for ≥ 7 days in any period

  • Becoming pregnant

  • An antipsychotic being prescribed during the course of the study

Recruitment procedures

Consenting patients with capacity will be recruited from the community, general practitioner clinics and psychiatric units in Pakistan.

Instruments

The following instruments will be used:
  • Prodromal Questionnaire-16 (PQ-16) [23]: A brief self-report screening questionnaire that assesses the presence of attenuated psychotic symptoms, the PQ-16 is a reliable measure and correlates well with the CAARMS. It is a good screening instrument, and the low number of items makes it feasible to screen populations [24].

  • SOFAS [18]: A global rating of current functioning, this instrument focuses on social and occupational functioning that is independent of the overall severity of the individual’s psychological symptoms [25].

  • CAARMS [17]: A semi-structured interview for the identification of individuals at increased risk of developing a first-episode psychotic disorder, it shows good to excellent concurrent, discriminant and predictive validity and excellent inter-rater reliability [17].

  • CogState [19]: This instrument comprises a number of individual tasks, each designed to test a specific area of cognition. The test battery is culturally neutral and user-friendly, and it covers all necessary cognitive domains. It comprises a range of computerised cognitive tasks able to measure baseline and change in all cognitive domains, and it shows good reliability and validity [26].

  • MADRS [20]: MADRS is an index of depression administered by a trained clinician who assigns a severity rating for symptoms of depression on the basis of a personal interview. The scale has demonstrated strong reliability, validity and sensitivity to change [27].

  • Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire [26]: A self-report measure of schizotypal personality disorder, this questionnaire incorporates nine schizotypal features. The scale consists of 74 yes/no items and has been shown to have strong reliability and validity [28].

We will use a structured rating scale to capture information on side effects. All the instruments have been translated into the Urdu language.

Study procedure

The schedule of visits and study procedures is outlined in Fig. 1 and in the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) diagram (Fig. 2) and a completed SPIRIT checklist is given in Additional file 1.
Fig. 1

Study flowchart outlining the timetable of study procedures. CAARMS Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States, MADRS Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, PQ-16 Prodromal Questionnaire-16, SOFAS Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, SPQ Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire

Fig. 2

Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments. CAARMS Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States, MADRS Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, PQ-16 Prodromal Questionnaire-16, SOFAS Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale

Consent visit

A trained research assistant (RA) will visit potential participants at their homes or places convenient to them and confirm their suitability for inclusion by screening them using the inclusion/exclusion criteria, confirming consent, and pregnancy testing, if appropriate. The RA will arrange for a doctor to complete checklists for medical history, physical examination and haematological investigations. Participants will also complete the MADRS. Random assignment to the treatment arms will be stratified using the MADRS (total score cut-off ≥ 21) because depressive symptoms may affect illness progression. A computer-generated random sequence based on a block randomised design (with varying block sizes of 2, 4, 6 and 8 in order to reduce predictability [29]) will be administered by an independent third party until all study data are collected and verified. Participants, parents and those involved in administering interventions, assessing outcomes, data entry and/or data analysis will be blind to group assignments. All eligible participants will be randomised to one of the four study arms and allocated a unique identification number, and they will commence study drug treatment within 1 week of providing consent.

Baseline visit

The baseline clinical and neuropsychological measures will be completed. The participants will be given a 1-week supply of the study medication appropriate to the trial arm to which they have been randomised; a study information sheet explaining that they are in a clinical study; and the telephone numbers of the senior research clinicians and the clinical trial office, as well as the name of the local PI. In accordance with International Conference for Harmonisation good clinical practice guidelines, copies of all the above will be placed in the individuals’ records along with contact names and telephone numbers.

Follow-up visits

The first follow-up visit will occur after 1 week of treatment with the trial medication to check for safety and tolerability of the treatment initiated. At the first follow-up visit, the participant will also receive sufficient trial medication for the rest of the month. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 1-month intervals for the 6-month duration of the intervention and at a final visit 6 months after the end of the intervention (12 months after baseline). During the monthly visits, along with clinical and safety assessments, the participants will complete the MADRS, CAARMS and SOFAS assessments, and they will also receive their study medication. The RA will collect and deliver these to the participant. This will give the research team the opportunity to closely monitor the participant’s physical and mental health, side effects and adherence (by pill count). Female participants with childbearing capacity taking part in the clinical trial will take a pregnancy test regularly. If they should become pregnant during the study, they will be withdrawn from the study.

Final visit

At this visit all clinical, neuropsychological and physical assessments will be completed. At all visits the participants’ cumulative clinical drug treatment will be updated from case notes.

Data management

Data will be collected by trained RAs to maintain data confidentiality and anonymisation. A unique trial identity number will be used for participant data collection and processing. Trial documents (consent form, source documents, assessment tools, case report forms) in hard copies will be kept at the study site in locked file cabinets. Electronic data will be encrypted and password-protected. Backup electronic data will be saved at two places on a hard drive and an institution server. Access to data, both in hard copies and in electronic versions, will be restricted, and only designated persons as approved by the site PI will handle the data. A signed duty log will be used every time the data is accessed. After trial completion the PI will be responsible for data archiving and preservation. Any application for data sharing will also be handled by PI, and access to data will be granted with PI permission.

Intervention

Minocycline

Minocycline will be administered orally for a 6-month period. We have chosen to trial 200 mg because this is the dose used in previous trials in early-phase schizophrenia [30, 31]. A titration schedule will be used to minimise attrition. During the first week of the study, participants will receive a 100-mg capsule of minocycline (or matching placebo) daily. If this is tolerated, the participants will receive 200 mg of minocycline (or matching placebo) for the remaining intervention period. If a participant complains of side effects, the treating psychiatrist (blind to the intervention) will be allowed to omit up to the next two doses of medication and continue from the last prescribed dose. If, despite this, the participant is unable to tolerate an increased dose, the dose will be reduced by 50-mg decrements to a tolerable dose of minocycline or matching placebo.

Omega-3 fatty acids

Omega-3 fatty acids will be administered orally, and the daily dose of 1.2 g/day is based on trials in an ultra-high risk population [32]. The active treatment will comprise 600-mg capsules containing concentrated marine fish oil. The proposed daily dose of two capsules will provide 720 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid and 480 mg of docosahexaenoic acid.

Placebo

Placebo capsules will be manufactured carefully to resemble the study drugs in appearance. The omega-3 fatty acid (in a soft-shell capsule) and minocycline (in a hard-shell capsule) will appear different because of their individual casing, but all participants will take one hard-shell and two soft-shell capsules, with placebo replacing the active comparator as required.

Research assistant training and inter-rater reliability

RAs in Pakistan are trained in the assessment measures, and inter-rater reliability will be measured throughout the study by local PIs.

Statistical analysis

Initially the data will be described using summary statistics, and possible between-group differences will be assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. Analysis in all cases will be by intention to treat. All protocol violations and major deviations will be recorded as they occur and will be included in reports on trial findings. Because the primary outcome is categorical, logistic regression will be used to assess between-group differences, which will be described using ORs and corresponding 95% CIs. If between-group differences in demographic or other factors are observed, we will estimate adjusted ORs. Secondary and subgroup analyses will also use ANOVA and logistic regression along with other standard hypothesis-testing methods, including Cox regression to analyse potential between-group differences in time to onset of psychosis with non-completers and those who do not develop psychosis included as censored observations. A complete statistical analysis plan will be written prior to database lock and subsequently will be discussed and approved by the trial steering committee.

Discontinuation

The trial will end either when the study period ends or by the recommendation of the drug safety monitoring board if serious untoward events occur. For individual study participants, the intervention will be discontinued if there are adverse effects that warrant this or if the participant requests to exit the study.

Adverse event reporting

Adverse events, whether related to study conduct and intervention or not, will be recorded. If there is a serious adverse event, immediate notification of collaborating investigators and sites will be undertaken by the site PI. All essential and appropriate measures will be taken to ensure patient safety. If there are safety issues with the investigational medicines, immediate action will be taken across the whole study to prevent others from avoidable harm.

Discussion

In Pakistan and other low-/middle-income countries, there is no specific TAU for individuals with ARMS. Minocycline and omega-3 fatty acids are inexpensive and widely available, and evidence suggests that they may be effective in delaying or preventing the onset of full psychosis. The compounds may be feasible and beneficial interventions for patients with ARMS, but there is a strong need to assess evidence of their efficacy. Should minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids prove to be effective, this will contribute to the growing body of evidence for treatment options in ARMS.

Trial status

This clinical trial was registered in October 2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02569307), and participants are being recruited until the end of 2017.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

ARMS: 

At-risk mental state

CAARMS: 

Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States

CBCM: 

Cognitive behavioural case management

CBT: 

Cognitive behavioural therapy

MADRS: 

Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale

PANSS: 

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

PI: 

Principal investigator

PQ-16: 

Prodromal Questionnaire-16

PUFA: 

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

RA: 

Research assistant

SOFAS: 

Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale

SPIRIT: 

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

SPQ: 

Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire

TAU: 

Treatment as usual

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Paul Stephenson for his critical review of the manuscript prior to submission. This study represents independent research funded by the Stanley Medical Research Institute (SMRI). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of SMRI.

Funding

This study is funded by the Stanley Research Medical Institute (SMRI; grant number 14 T-003). SMRI played no role in the design of the study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

IQ is the chief investigator of the study. IQ, IBC and NH conceived of the idea for the study, contributed to the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. SC contributed to the study design, advised on quantitative aspects of the study and drafted the manuscript. ABK and SF are involved in recruitment and data collection and assisted with the manuscript. SL contributed to the design of the study and provided statistical advice. MOH, MH, HAN, BR, FAM and JFWD contributed to the design of the study. JS contributed to the design of the study and advised on biomarkers. ARY contributed to the design of the study and advised on assessments and outcome measures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board (IRB) approval has been obtained from the ethics committee of the Karachi Medical and Dental College and Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan. Written consent will be obtained from each participant prior to any trial-related data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ashworth Research Centre, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester
(3)
Pakistan Institute of Living & Learning
(4)
Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool
(5)
Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust
(6)
School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire
(7)
Abbasi Shaheed Hospital
(8)
Ziauddin University
(9)
Institute of Psychiatry & WHO Collaborating Centre

References

  1. Yung AR, McGorry PD, McFarlane CA, et al. Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22:283–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, et al. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:220–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yung AR, Yuen HP, Berger G, et al. Declining transition rate in ultra high risk (prodromal) services: dilution or reduction of risk? Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:673–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Yung AR, McGorry PD. The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):353–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hafner H. Modelling the early course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:325–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, et al. Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:975–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. McGlashan TH, Zipursky RB, Perkins D, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:790–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrison AP, Stewart SL, French P, et al. Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at high-risk of psychosis-2 (EDIE-2): trial rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011;5:24–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management. NICE Clinical Guidance 155. London: NICE; 2013. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg155. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.Google Scholar
  10. McGorry PD, Nelson B, Amminger GP, et al. Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:1206–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oya K, Kishi T, Iwata N. Efficacy and tolerability of minocycline augmentation therapy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014;29:483–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith K, Leyden JJ. Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1329–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stafford MR, Jackson H, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f185.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. van der Gaag M, Smit F, Bechdolf A, et al. Preventing a first episode of psychosis: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups. Schizophr Res. 2013;149:56–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutton P, Taylor PJ. Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44:449–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McGorry PD, Nelson B, Markulev C, et al. Effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in young people at ultrahigh risk for psychotic disorders: the NEURAPRO randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74:19–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yung AR, Yuen HP, McGorry PD, et al. Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:964–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:1148–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Maruff P, Thomas E, Cysique L, et al. Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;24:165–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ising HK, Smit F, Veling W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventing first-episode psychosis in ultra-high-risk subjects: multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2015;45:1435–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ising HK, Kraan TC, Rietdijk J, et al. Four-year follow-up of cognitive behavioral therapy in persons at ultra-high risk for developing psychosis: the Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) trial. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:1243–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Loewy RL, Bearden CE, Johnson JK, et al. The Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes. Schizophr Res. 2005;79:117–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL, et al. The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:1288–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, et al. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;101(4):323–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pietrzak RH, Olver J, Norman T, et al. A comparison of the CogState schizophrenia battery and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) battery in assessing cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009;31:848–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Davidson J, Turnbull CD, Strickland R, et al. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986;73:544–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Raine A. The SPQ: a scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17:555–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:15–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chaudhry I, Hallak J, Husain N, et al. Minocycline benefits negative symptoms in early schizophrenia: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients on standard treatment. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26:1185–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu F, Guo X, Wu R, et al. Minocycline supplementation for the treatment of negative symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2014;153:169–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Amminger GP, Schäfer MR, Schlögelhofer M, et al. Longer-term outcome in the prevention of psychotic disorders by the Vienna omega-3 study. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7934.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement