Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia on cognitive function: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Simon D. Kyle1Email author,
  • Madeleine E. D. Hurry1, 2,
  • Richard Emsley3,
  • Annemarie I. Luik1, 4,
  • Ximena Omlin1,
  • Kai Spiegelhalder5,
  • Colin A. Espie1, 4 and
  • Claire E. Sexton2
Trials201718:281

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2012-6

Received: 16 February 2017

Accepted: 23 May 2017

Published: 17 June 2017

Abstract

Background

The daytime effects of insomnia pose a significant burden to patients and drive treatment seeking. In addition to subjective deficits, meta-analytic data show that patients experience reliable objective impairments across several cognitive domains. While Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective and scalable treatment, we know little about its impact upon cognitive function. Trials of CBT-I have typically used proxy measures for cognitive functioning, such as fatigue or work performance scales, and no study has assessed self-reported impairment in cognitive function as a primary outcome. Moreover, only a small number of studies have assessed objective cognitive performance, pre-to-post CBT-I, with mixed results. This study specifically aims to (1) investigate the impact of CBT-I on cognitive functioning, assessed through both self-reported impairment and objective performance measures, and (2) examine whether change in sleep mediates this impact.

Methods/design

We propose a randomised controlled trial of 404 community participants meeting criteria for Insomnia Disorder. In the DISCO trial (D efining the I mpact of improved S leep on CO gnitive function (DISCO)) participants will be randomised to digital automated CBT-I delivered by a web and/or mobile platform (in addition to treatment as usual (TAU)) or to a wait-list control (in addition to TAU). Online assessments will take place at 0 (baseline), 10 (post-treatment), and 24 (follow-up) weeks. At week 25, all participants allocated to the wait-list group will be offered digital CBT-I, at which point the controlled element of the trial will be complete. The primary outcome is self-reported cognitive impairment at post-treatment (10 weeks). Secondary outcomes include objective cognitive performance, insomnia severity, sleepiness, fatigue, and self-reported cognitive failures and emotional distress. All main analyses will be carried out on completion of follow-up assessments and will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. Further analyses will determine to what extent observed changes in self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance are mediated by changes in sleep. The trial is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, and by the NIHR Oxford Health BRC.

Discussion

This study will be the first large-scale examination of the impact of digital CBT-I on self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN89237370. Registered on 17 October 2016.

Keywords

SleepInsomniaCognitive impairmentCognitive behavioural therapyInternet

Background

Insomnia disorder is defined as persistent difficulties with sleep initiation and/or maintenance, resulting in significant daytime impairment. Insomnia affects approximately 10–12% of the adult population and is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, depression, and early mortality [1, 2]. Daytime functioning and quality of life are known to be severely affected in those with insomnia and often drive treatment seeking [35]. More specifically, previous work shows that the most commonly cited areas of daytime dysfunction are problems with fatigue, work performance, cognitive functioning, and emotional regulation [6].

With respect to cognitive function, meta-analytic data indicate that patients exhibit reliable impairments (of medium effect size) in tasks probing episodic memory, working memory, and problem solving [7]. Recent, well-controlled studies also find evidence of insomnia-related impairments in switching of attention and working memory [8], and sustained attention and episodic memory [9]. These impairments are associated with global insomnia severity, sleep duration, and disturbed sleep continuity (from both sleep diaries and polysomnography). In general, neurocognitive findings are consistent with results from functional imaging studies, which reveal evidence of hypoactivation within fronto-striatal networks during task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [1013].

Despite cognitive impairment featuring in contemporary diagnostic criteria for insomnia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition: DSM-5; International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edition: ICSD-3) [14], and posing significant burden to patients, there has been little evaluation of the impact of insomnia treatments on cognitive function [15]. This is surprising because cognitive impairment may drive other daytime impairments associated with insomnia (e.g. reduced work performance and increased accident risk) [6, 16]. To date, trials of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), the first-line treatment for persistent insomnia disorder [1], have tended to employ proxy measures (e.g. general daytime functioning, work performance) or nonvalidated, single items to probe self-reported cognitive functioning as a secondary outcome [15]. No study has assessed cognitive functioning as a primary outcome. Moreover, to our knowledge only four small studies have assessed objective cognitive performance, pre-to-post CBT-I [10, 1719], providing preliminary evidence that sleep improvement may be associated with improvements in complex attention and executive function. However, the largest trial to date [19] failed to observe treatment effects for delayed recall, abstract reasoning, or working memory. Thus, it remains unclear if CBT-I confers reliable improvement to cognitive performance and to what extent such improvement may be mediated by reductions in insomnia severity. If insomnia causally drives cognitive impairment then we might logically expect that (1) CBT-I improves both sleep and cognitive function, and (2) treatment effects on cognition will operate via the pathway of improved sleep.

The aim of this study, therefore, is to investigate the impact of CBT-I on cognitive functioning, assessed through both self-report and objective measures. We will recruit participants meeting criteria for insomnia disorder who also endorse cognitive complaints, and conduct a parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CBT-I + TAU versus wait-list control (WLC + TAU). CBT-I will be delivered online via a website and/or app [20]. Online interventions have shown robust effects on insomnia severity and self-reported sleep parameters, with effect sizes in the range of face-to-face interventions [21, 22]. Assessments, including questionnaires and computerised cognitive tasks, will also be delivered and completed fully online. This will be the first examination of the impact of digital CBT-I (dCBT-I) on self-reported cognitive impairment and objective performance in participants meeting criteria for insomnia disorder.

The primary hypothesis for the trial is:
  1. 1.

    dCBT-I will reduce self-reported cognitive impairment at the end of treatment (10 weeks) relative to WLC

     
The secondary hypotheses are:
  1. 1.

    dCBT-I will reduce self-reported cognitive impairment at follow-up (24 weeks) relative to WLC

     
  2. 2.

    dCBT-I will improve objective cognitive performance (in the following domains: simple attention, visual attention, episodic memory, working memory, and complex processing speed), relative to WLC (10 and 24 weeks)

     
  3. 3.

    dCBT-I will reduce insomnia severity and improve sleep efficiency relative to WLC (10 and 24 weeks)

     
  4. 4.

    Change in insomnia severity and sleep efficiency at week 10 will mediate change in self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance at week 24

     
  5. 5.

    dCBT-I will lead to improvements in fatigue, sleepiness, self-reported cognitive failures, depression, and anxiety relative to WLC (weeks 10 and 24)

     

Methods/design

Research design

The study is a parallel-group, superiority RCT of dCBT-I (+ TAU) versus WLC (+ TAU). The study will be carried out completely online. Participants will be administered screening, informed consent, assessments (tasks and questionnaires), allocation to condition, and intervention through web-based platforms. Online assessment of our primary and secondary dependent variables will take place at 0 (baseline), 10 (post-treatment), and 24 (follow-up) weeks. At week 25 all participants allocated to the WLC will be offered dCBT-I to improve their insomnia (see Fig. 1 for trial design). Ethical approval has been granted from the University of Oxford Medical Sciences Inter-Divisional Research Ethics Committee (R46116/RE001) and the trial is registered at ISRCTN (ISRCTN89237370).
Fig. 1

Flow chart diagram showing summary of the trial design for the Defining the Impact of improved Sleep on COgnitive function (DISCO) study. DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version 5, SCI Sleep Condition Indicator, dCBT-I digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia, WLC Wait-list control

Participants

We will recruit 404 community participants who report clinically-significant insomnia. Our inclusion criteria comprise: (a) a positive screen for probable DSM-5 insomnia disorder using items from the Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI) (scoring ≤2 on item 1 (sleep latency) or item 2 (wakefulness during the night) + scoring ≤2 on item 3 (frequency of disturbance) + scoring ≤1 on item 4 (sleep quality) + scoring ≤2 on daytime functioning items 5 or 6 + scoring ≤2 on item 8 (chronicity of problem)) [23], (b) endorsement of difficulties with concentration or memory using items from the Daytime Functioning and Sleep Attribution Scale (selecting ‘somewhat of a problem’ or ‘a very big problem’ on at least one item, when asked how much of a problem ‘difficulty concentrating and focussing on things’ and ‘difficulty remembering things’ has been in the past 2 weeks) [24], (c) being aged 25 years and above (to minimise the possibility that circadian rhythm disruption, which is common in late adolescence/early 20s, is the source of insomnia complaints), (d) having reliable Internet access at home or at work, (e) being able to read and understand English, and (f) currently living in the UK. We will screen for comorbid conditions and medication use via online survey and exclude people with (1) symptoms of a probable additional sleep disorder (e.g. possible obstructive sleep apnoea, restless legs syndrome [25]), (2) diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, (3) psychosis or mania, (4) serious physical health concerns necessitating surgery or with a prognosis of under 6 months, (4) those undergoing a psychological treatment programme for insomnia with a health professional, (5) habitual night shift, evening, or rotating shift-workers, (6) those taking prescribed sleeping pills more than 2 nights in the past 2 weeks prior to study entry, and (7) those with suicidal ideation with intent. We will not omit participants for any other physical or mental health problems. The study will recruit through multiple channels. These include online, print and broadcast media advertisements, and the use of contact lists where adults who have agreed to be contacted about future studies will be notified about the DISCO trial. In addition to receiving free access to the dCBT-I programme, participants will also receive payment in the form of Amazon™ gift vouchers for completing each assessment point (£5 for baseline; £10 for post-treatment; £15 for follow-up).

Randomisation and allocation concealment

This study will use simple randomisation with an allocation ratio of 1:1, as recommended for large clinical trials [26]. Randomisation will be carried out using the randomisation function within Qualtrics Survey Software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA). On completion of baseline measures, each subject will be randomly assigned by the software to either dCBT-I or WLC. The research team, therefore, will be unable to influence randomisation and will have no access to future allocations.

Blinding

Self-report assessments and performance tasks will be completed entirely online. Participants will be informed of their randomisation outcome (dCBT-I or WLC) via email, and so they will not be blind to treatment allocation. The research team, except the trial coordinator, will be blind to allocation. The trial coordinator will not be blind since they will inform participants of group allocation and monitor completion of assessments. Participant contact with the trial coordinator will be limited to scripted phrases, detailing instructions for dCBT-I access and completion of assessments, and will not cover therapy content or support. Statistical analyses will be conducted by a member of the research team who will have access to all data.

Assessment points

Assessments will take place at weeks 0 (baseline), 10 (post-treatment), and 24 (follow-up) (see Fig. 2). Participants are advised to allow enough time to complete the questionnaires and cognitive tasks in one session, on their home computer or laptop in a quiet, distraction-free environment. On completion of the trial (week 25), all participants in the control arm will be offered access to dCBT-I. Baseline variables include demographic information such as age, gender, ethnic group, partner status, employment status, and education. Frequency of sleep medication use will also be monitored at each assessment point.
Fig. 2

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) figure

Intervention

dCBT-I will be delivered using the Sleepio® programme (www.sleepio.com and associated Sleepio® app) [19]. We have previously described the Sleepio® programme in two trial protocols published in this journal [27, 28]. The programme is fully automated and its underlying algorithms drive the delivery of information, support, and advice in a personally tailored manner. Delivery is structured into six weekly sessions, lasting an approximately 20 min each. The full programme can be accessed via the website or iOS app. Treatment content is based on CBT-I manuals and includes a behavioural component (sleep restriction, stimulus control, and relaxation), a cognitive component (paradoxical intention, cognitive restructuring, mindfulness, positive imagery, and putting the day to rest) and an educational component (psychoeducation and sleep hygiene) [2931].

The programme is highly interactive, and content is presented by an animated virtual therapist (‘The Prof’). Before the start of the programme, participants complete a questionnaire to tailor the therapy and to set treatment goals. Participants complete daily sleep diary information throughout the intervention, which is used by the programme to provide tailored, personalised advice. Participants can opt to receive an email and/or SMS reminder each morning to prompt them to fill in their sleep diary. In addition, throughout the course of therapy, participants have access to an online community forum; weekly sleep expert sessions moderated by a clinical psychologist; and online library of information about sleep and sleep disorders. During weekly sleep expert sessions, users may vote on topics and submit questions to be addressed by the clinical psychologist. Questions are answered in such a way as to benefit as many people as possible and no personal medical advice is provided. Participants can view their online ‘case file’, which includes four sections: a progress review, a 'to-do' list, an agreed sleep schedule, and a list of further reading. The system provides online analytics which can be used to monitor adherence by assessing how many sessions were completed and the number of weeks to complete the course. All information gathered during the programme will be stored in encrypted form on secure servers. Participants will have access to the intervention for up to 12 weeks. dCBT-I will in effect be dCBT-I + TAU because there will be no requirement for participants (in either group) to alter their usual care in any way.

Outcome measures

Our primary outcome will be self-reported cognitive impairment, assessed using the British Columbia Cognitive Complaints Inventory (BC-CCI) [32]. The BC-CCI comprises six questions scored using a 4-point scale (0–3 points; total score range: 0–18) probing perceived cognitive problems (with concentration, memory, and thinking skills) during the past 7 days. It was originally designed to probe cognitive complaints in those with depression – a disorder highly comorbid with insomnia, and sharing similar cognitive features [33]. Given the absence of a widely used measure of insomnia-related cognitive impairment the BC-CCI was selected based on good face validity, internal consistency data (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82–0.86), and short (1-week) reference period.

Secondary measures

Objective cognitive performance will be assessed through an online battery of tasks and will include measures of simple attention (dependent variable [DV]: simple reaction time [msec] for correct identification of matching pairs [‘snap’]), episodic memory (DV: number of attempts to identify identical pairs of cards within a matrix), working memory (DV: longest sequence of correctly recalled digits), visual attention (DV: time taken [secs] to link numbered circles), and complex processing speed (DV: number of correctly matched digit-symbols within a 2-min interval). The battery was developed by the UK Biobank Cognitive Psychology Sub-Group for Cognitive Assessments. Prior to task commencement, participants are asked which text entry and pointing methods they will use to complete tasks (e.g. on full-sized keyboard, touchscreen, laptop trackpad or mouse).

Insomnia severity

Participants will complete the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) [34] to quantify global insomnia severity. The ISI is a seven-item insomnia assessment tool, probing both nighttime and daytime aspects of insomnia disorder, and is sensitive to change following CBT-I. It is a recommended outcome measure in insomnia trials [35]. The ISI will be supplemented with four items from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [36] to permit calculation of quantitative sleep parameters, namely: total time in bed, sleep-onset latency, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency.

Fatigue

Fatigue will be assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) [37], a 20-item measure comprising five subscales; general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation and reduced activity.

Sleepiness

Daytime somnolence will be assessed with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [38], an eight-item measure (score range: 0–24) probing propensity for ‘dosing’ in a range of daytime situations.

Cognitive failures

Self-reported cognitive failures will be assessed with the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) [39]. The CFQ comprises 25 questions scored using a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0–100) to identify frequency of minor cognitive mistakes over the past month.

Depression

Depressive symptoms will be measured using the nine-item (score range: 0–27) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [40].

Anxiety

Symptoms of anxiety will be assessed using two items [‘Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge’, ‘not being able to stop or control worrying’; score range: 0–6] from the seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 questionnaire (GAD-7) [41].

Assessment of safety

The likelihood of serious adverse events occurring during this trial is low since CBT-I (in any format) has not been reported to cause them. The intervention offered in the trial has previously been tested in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial and no adverse outcomes were reported [20]. Since the trial is completed fully online, without formal participant contact, we are unlikely to become aware of potential adverse events. However, should we do so, we will define serious adverse events as: (1) death, (2) suicide attempt, (3) admission to hospital, and (4) formal complaints about the online intervention.

Studies have shown that daytime sleepiness and vigilance impairment may increase during Sleep Restriction Therapy (SRT) (one component of CBT-I), owing to restricted sleep opportunity. At the end of treatment (week 10), we will, therefore, ask participants to complete an adapted version of a previously used measure to assess differential rates of self-reported adverse effects [42].

Sample size calculation

Our planned primary intention-to-treat analysis will compare dCBT-I + TAU versus WLC + TAU for self-reported cognitive impairment (BC-CCI). A systematic review of the cognitive functioning and CBT-I literature shows a standardised mean difference of 0.42 at post-treatment for self-reported outcomes [15]. We will recruit and randomise 404 participants (202 participants/arm). This sample size will give 90% power to detect a minimum standardised effect size of 0.42 at 5% level of significance, accounting for 40% attrition.

Statistical analysis

In accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, we will record and report all participant flow [43]. Descriptive statistics of recruitment, dropout, and completeness of interventions will be provided. The main efficacy analysis will be via intention-to-treat including all participants, with no planned interim analysis for efficacy or futility. Baseline characteristics will be presented by randomised group without formal statistical tests. We will test the primary hypothesis for between-group change in the primary outcome (BC-CCI) at 10 weeks using analysis of covariance with baseline outcome measure and treatment assignment as fixed effects, and apply standard regression diagnostics. The analysis will use statistical techniques for handling missing outcome data under a missing-at-random assumption. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using an analogous method. Analysis of all treatment effects will be undertaken after follow-up (week 24) assessments are completed. Additional exploratory analyses will assess whether age moderates treatment-related effects on cognitive functioning outcomes.

We will use modern causal inference methods to investigate the mediation hypothesis. If the efficacy analysis shows significant between-group differences in the ISI and sleep efficiency (based on PSQI items) at 10 weeks, then we will use parametric regression models to test for the indirect effect of ISI/sleep efficiency on primary and secondary cognitive outcomes at 24 weeks, and the residual direct effect of treatment on cognitive outcomes at 24 weeks. Since all the measures are continuous, the indirect effects are calculated by multiplying relevant pathways and bootstrapping is used to produce valid standard errors for the indirect effects. All analyses will adjust for baseline measures of the mediators (ISI/sleep efficiency), outcomes and putative measured confounders. Mediation analyses are potentially biased by measurement error in mediators and hidden confounding between mediators and outcomes and we will investigate the sensitivity of the estimates to these problems. All analyses will be carried out using Stata [44].

Dissemination

We will publish the results of this study in peer-reviewed journals, irrespective of magnitude or direction of effect. Findings will also be presented at both national and international scientific meetings. The results will be made available online wherever possible, if permitted by journal policies.

Items in this protocol comply with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Checklist (see SPIRIT Checklist in Additional file 1 and Fig. 2 for the SPIRIT figure).

Discussion

Insomnia is a prevalent, persistent and impairing sleep disorder. Patients consider cognitive dysfunction as one of the most important consequences of insomnia, yet we do not know whether such dysfunction can be ameliorated through evidence-based intervention. This study will determine whether treating insomnia with dCBT-I improves both self-reported cognitive impairment and objective cognitive performance, and whether change in insomnia severity and sleep efficiency mediates such improvement.

Trial status

Recruitment commenced on 18 October 2016 and is ongoing.

Abbreviations

BC-CCI: 

British Columbia Cognitive Complaints Inventory

CBT: 

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

CBT-I: 

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia

CFQ: 

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

dCBT-I: 

Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia

DSM-5: 

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,5th edition

DV: 

Dependent variable

ESS: 

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

GAD: 

Generalised Anxiety Disorder

ICSD-3: 

International Classification of Sleep Disorders,3rd edition

ISI: 

Insomnia Severity Index

MEQ: 

Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire

MFI: 

Multidimensional Fatigue Index

PHQ-9: 

Patient Health Questionnaire

PSQI: 

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

RCT: 

Randomised controlled trial

SCI: 

Sleep Condition Indicator

SRT: 

Sleep restriction therapy

TAU: 

Treatment as usual

WLC: 

Wait-list control

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, and by the NIHR Oxford Health BRC.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SDK and CES are the chief investigators, conceived of the study, contributed to the design, and drafted the manuscript. MEDH contributed to the design, is the trial coordinator, and helped to draft the manuscript. RE contributed to the design, is responsible for the main statistical outcome analysis and is responsible for the statistical mediation analysis. KS and CAE contributed to the design and helped to draft the manuscript. AIL helped to draft the manuscript and will support recruitment and participant access to digital CBT-I. XO helped to draft the manuscript and will support participant recruitment. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

CAE is the cofounder and Clinical and Scientific Director of the CBT-I programme (Big Health Ltd., Sleepio®). AIL holds a position at Oxford that is funded by Big Health Ltd. The programme is being provided to all participants at no cost. No other investigators declare potential conflicts of interest. The study will be conducted by the University of Oxford, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute. The University of Oxford has a Memorandum of Understanding with Big Health Ltd. (Sleepio®) for the conduct of joint research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants are required to read the information sheet and consent to participate in the study. This included consent for their anonymised data to be published. The study has been granted ethical approval by the University of Oxford Medical Sciences Inter-Divisional Research Ethics Committee (R46116/RE001) and the trial is registered at ISRCTN (ISRCTN89237370).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, University of Oxford, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology
(2)
Oxford Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB Centre), University of Oxford
(3)
Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
(4)
Big Health Ltd.
(5)
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg

References

  1. Morin CM, Benca R. Chronic insomnia. Lancet. 2012;379(9821):1129–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Morin CM, Drake LD, Harvey AH, Krystal AD, Manber R, Riemann D, et al. Insomnia disorders. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.26.
  3. Kyle SD, Espie CA, Morgan K. Not just a minor thing, it is something major, which stops you from functioning daily’: quality of life and daytime functioning in insomnia. Behav Sleep Med. 2010;8(3):123–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kyle SD, Morgan K, Espie CA. Insomnia and health-related quality of life. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14(1):69–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Espie CA, Kyle SD, Hames P, Cyhlarova E, Benzeval M. The daytime impact of DSM-5 insomnia disorder: comparative analysis of insomnia subtypes from the Great British Sleep Survey. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(12):1478–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kyle SD, Crawford MR, Morgan K, Spiegelhalder K, Clark AA, Espie CA. The Glasgow Sleep Impact Index (GSII): a novel patient-centred measure for assessing sleep-related quality of life impairment in Insomnia Disorder. Sleep Med. 2013;14(6):493–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortier-Brochu É, Beaulieu-Bonneau S, Ivers H, Morin CM. Insomnia and daytime cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(1):83–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shekleton JA, Flynn-Evans EE, Miller B, Epstein LJ, Kirsch D, Brogna LA, et al. Neurobehavioral performance impairment in insomnia: relationships with self-reported sleep and daytime functioning. Sleep. 2014;37(1):107–16. doi:10.5665/sleep.3318.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fortier-Brochu E, Morin CM. Cognitive impairment in individuals with insomnia: clinical significance and correlates. Sleep. 2014;37(11):1787–98. doi:10.5665/sleep.4172.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Altena E, Van Der Werf YD, Sanz-Arigita EJ, Voorn TA, Rombouts SA, Kuijer JP, et al. Prefrontal hypoactivation and recovery in insomnia. Sleep. 2008;31(9):1271–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Stoffers D, Altena E, van der Werf YD, Sanz-Arigita EJ, Voom TA, Astill RG, et al. The caudate: a key node in the neuronal network imbalance of insomnia? Brain. 2014;137(2):610–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Drummond SP, Walker M, Almklov E, Campos M, Anderson DE, Straus LD. Neural correlates of working memory performance in primary insomnia. Sleep. 2013;36(9):1307–16. doi:10.5665/sleep.2952.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Spiegelhalder K, Regen W, Baglioni C, Nissen C, Riemann D, Kyle SD. Neuroimaging insights into insomnia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15(3):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Herbert V, Kyle SD, Pratt D. Does cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia improve cognitive performance? A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Sleep Med Rev.Google Scholar
  16. Leger D, Bayon V, Ohayon MM, Philip P, Ement P, Metlaine A, et al. Insomnia and accidents: cross-sectional study (EQUINOX) on sleep-related home, work and car accidents in 5293 subjects with insomnia from 10 countries. J Sleep Res. 2014;23(2):143–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miro E, Lupianez J, Martinez MP, Sanchez AI, Diaz-Piedra C, Guzman MA, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia improves attentional function in fibromyalgia syndrome: a pilot, randomized controlled trial. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(5):770–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Omvik S, Sivertsen B, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Havik OE, Nordhus IH. Daytime functioning in older patients suffering from chronic insomnia: treatment outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing CBT with zopiclone. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46(5):623–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilckens KA, Hall MH, Nebes RD, Monk TH, Buysse DJ. Changes in cognitive performance are associated with changes in sleep in older adults with insomnia. Behav Sleep Med. 2016;14(3):295–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Espie CA, Kyle SD, Williams C, Ong JC, Douglas NJ, Hames P, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated media-rich web application. Sleep. 2012;35(6):769–81. doi:10.5665/sleep.1872.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Seyffert M, Lagisetty P, Landgraf J, Chopra V, Pfeiffer PN, Conte ML, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy to treat insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149139.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Zachariae R, Lyby MS, Ritterband LM, O’Toole MS. Efficacy of Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia—A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;30:1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Espie CA, Kyle SD, Hames P, Gardani M, Fleming L, Cape J. The Sleep Condition Indicator: a clinical screening tool to evaluate insomnia disorder. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e004183. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004183.-2013-004183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kyle SD, Morgan K, Espie CA. The Daytime Functioning and Sleep Attribution Scale (DFSAS): a new insomnia-specific measure to probe daytime impairment and poor sleep attributions. 2010. Sleep;33, A192–A193). One Westbrook Corporate Ctr., Ste. 920, Westchester, IL 60154 USA: American Academy of Sleep Medicine.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson SJ, Nutt DJ, Alford C, Argyropoulos SV, Baldwin DS, Bateson AN, et al. British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus statement on evidence-based treatment of insomnia, parasomnias and circadian rhythm disorders. J Psychopharmacol. 2010;24(11):1577–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ. Is restricted randomization necessary? BMJ. 2006;332(7556):1506–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman D, Goodwin GM, Yu L-M, Harrison PJ, Emsley R, Bostock S, et al. Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on the mental health of university students: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:236. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0756-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Espie C, Luik AI, Cape J, Drake CL, Niroshan Siriwardena A, Ong JC, et al. Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia versus sleep hygiene education: the impact of improved sleep on functional health, quality of life and psychological well-being. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:257. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1364-7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Espie CA, Inglis SJ, Tessler S, Harvey L. The clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic insomnia: implementation and evaluation of a sleep clinic in general medical practice. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39:45–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Espie CA, MacMahon KM, Kelly HL, Broomfield NM, Douglas NJ, Engleman HM, et al. Randomized clinical effectiveness trial of nurse-administered small-group cognitive behavior therapy for persistent insomnia in general practice. Sleep. 2007;30:574–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Espie CA, Fleming L, Cassidy J, Samuel L, Taylor L, White C, et al. Randomized controlled clinical effectiveness trial of cognitive behavior therapy compared with treatment as usual for persistent insomnia in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4651–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Iverson GL, Lam RW. Rapid screening for perceived cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2013;25(2):135–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Benca RM, Peterson MJ. Insomnia and depression. Sleep. 2008;9(1):S3–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Morin CM. Insomnia: psychological assessment and management. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  35. Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006;29:1155–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Smets E, Garssen B, Bonke BD, De Haes J. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39(3):315–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982;21(1):1–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;32:345–59.Google Scholar
  41. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;16(10):1092–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kyle SD, Morgan K, Spiegelhalder K, Espie CA. No pain, no gain: an exploratory within-subjects mixed-methods evaluation of the patient experience of sleep restriction therapy (SRT) for insomnia. Sleep Med. 2011;12(8):735–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moher D, Hopwell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement