Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Anesthetic management of cesarean section in cases of placenta accreta, with versus without abdominal aortic balloon occlusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Qinjun Chu1,
  • Dan Shen1,
  • Long He1,
  • Hongwei Wang1,
  • Xianlan Zhao2,
  • Zhimin Chen2,
  • Yanli Wang3 and
  • Wei Zhang1Email author
Trials201718:240

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1977-5

Received: 23 October 2016

Accepted: 4 May 2017

Published: 26 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Placenta accreta (PA), a severe complication during delivery, is closely linked with massive hemorrhage which could endanger the lives of both mother and baby. Moreover, the incidence of PA has increased dramatically with the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries in the past few decades. Therefore, studies evaluating the effects of different perioperative managements based on different modalities in the treatment of PA are necessary. Among the numerous treatment measures, prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) in combination with cesarean section for PA seems to be more advantageous than others. However, up to now, all studies on AABO were almost retrospective. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routinely using the AABO technology for control intraoperative hemorrhage in patients with PA. Thus, we hope to carry out a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) study to confirm the effectiveness of the AABO technology in patients with PA.

Methods/design

This trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective RCT that will test the superiority of AABO in combination with cesarean section compared to the traditional hysterectomy following cesarean section for parturients with PA. A total of 170 parturients with PA undergoing cesarean section will be randomized to receive either AABO in combination with cesarean section or the traditional hysterectomy following cesarean section. The primary outcome is estimated blood loss. The most important secondary outcome is the occurrence of cesarean hysterectomy during delivery; others include blood transfusion volume, operating time, neonate’s Apgar scores (collected at 1, 5 and 10 min), length of stay in intensive care unit, total hospital stay, and balloon occlusion-relative data.

Discussion

This prospective trial will test the superiority of AABO in combination with cesarean section compared to the traditional hysterectomy following cesarean section for parturients with PA. It may provide strong evidence about the benefits and risks of AABO in combination with cesarean section for parturients with PA.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16008842. Registered on 14 July 2016.

Keywords

Placenta accreta Cesarean section Massive hemorrhage Abdominal aortic balloon occlusion Randomized controlled trial

Background

Placenta accreta (PA), a kind of morbidly adherent placenta, involves an absence of decidua basalis; the placenta always adheres to the underlying myometrium [1]. This morbidly obstetric condition is a severe complication during delivery. It is closely linked with massive hemorrhage, which could endanger the lives of both mother and baby [2, 3]. In patients with PA, median intraoperative blood loss is about 2000 ml during delivery, and in 10% of the cases it has been more than 10,000 ml in some institutions [4, 5]. Multiple pathophysiological conditions are involved in massive hemorrhage from patients with PA during cesarean section, including pelvic viscera injury to the bladder, ureter, bowel, or other organs during the surgery. When massive hemorrhage cannot be effectively controlled, multisystem organ failure (MOF) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) will follow [6]. Therefore, placenta accreta poses a serious threat to the safety of the mother.

However, in recent years, the incidence of PA has risen with the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries [7]. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report, China has become the country with the highest rate of cesarean sections, up to 68%. China will face a big challenge with its two-child family policy initiation. In America, the cesarean delivery rate will be 56.2% if the cesarean rate continues to grow as it has in the past, and there will be 6236 patients with placenta previa, 4504 patients with placenta accreta, and 130 maternal deaths annually [8]. Therefore, studies evaluating the effects of different perioperative management approaches based on different modalities in the treatment of placenta accreta are necessary.

In the traditional method, hysterectomy following cesarean section is usually indicated as the treatment option in patients with morbidly adherent placenta. This treatment reduces maternal morbidity, but it results in infertility [9]. To minimize intraoperative hemorrhage and facilitate surgery, some novel treatment options have been described, including proximal ligation of the internal iliac artery or uterine artery and vascular balloon catheters placed in the iliac artery, uterine artery, or even the abdominal aorta [10]. Among the numerous treatment measures, prophylactic balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta seems to be more advantageous than others [11, 12]. Recently, a large-sample retrospective study from our single center also shows that prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) has a promising future [13, 14]. These retrospective studies strongly suggest that we need an adequately powered prospective study to demonstrate the benefits and risks. Thus, the primary aim of the study is to investigate the benefits and risks of AABO in combination with cesarean section for PA.

Methods/design

Trial design

This protocol was developed in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Statement. For the SPIRIT checklist see Additional file 1, and for the SPIRIT figure see Additional file 2. This trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that will test the superiority of AABO in combination with cesarean section compared to the traditional hysterectomy following cesarean section for parturients with PA. A brief flow diagram of the study is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the study

Recruitment

From June 2016 to December 2018, a total of 170 patients diagnosed with PA, based on the obstetrician’s knowledge and experience and on an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination [15, 16], will be enrolled in this study at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Enrollment criteria

All the subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria:
  1. 1.

    Patient diagnosed with PA based on obstetrician’s knowledge and experience and on ultrasonic or MRI examination

     
  2. 2.

    Undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section

     
The exclusion criteria are as follows:
  1. 1.

    Patient’s or relative’s refusal to participate

     
  2. 2.

    Uncontrolled sepsis or infection of femoral artery puncture site in inguinal region

     
  3. 3.

    Severe peripheral vascular disease

     
  4. 4.

    Aortic diseases including, e.g., aortoarteritis, aortic aneurysm, dissection of aorta, and aortic regurgitation, etc.

     
  5. 5.

    Severe cardiac disease

     

Randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding

Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to either the traditional treatment group or the interventional treatment group. Group assignments are generated using a computer algorithm (Winpepi version 11) that allocates patients in equal numbers to both groups. The randomization list will be sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes, which will be stored in a double-locked cabinet. Randomization is implemented by a research assistant who is not involved in recruitment. After random assignment, the envelopes will again be stored separately in a double-locked cabinet. Allocation concealment will not be broken until the trial is complete.

Study organization

The study will be supervised for data collection, security, and storage by the Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and Zhao XL and Zhang W will be in charge of data quality control. The institutional ethics committee from our hospital will be involved in the whole process of the trial.

Trial interventions

All patients will receive the standard multidisciplinary team service (including the senior obstetrician, gynecologist, anesthesiologist, neonatology teams, urologist, imaging doctor, and adequate number of blood units in the operating room). The antepartum diagnosis of PA is made clinically, based on the pelvic ultrasound or MRI. Pregnant woman with PA diagnosed by ultrasound or MRI will be recruited in this study. In both groups, pregnant woman will undergo the standard protocol, as described previously [14]. Considering the risk of massive bleeding complicated by profound hypotension and coagulopathy, we choose general anesthesia for all patients with PA [17, 18]. Endotracheal intubation is performed with the use of a rapid sequence induction (RSI) technique [19, 20]. We monitor invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP), electrocardiogram (ECG), SPO2, PetCO2, temperature (T), arterial blood gas (ABG), and thrombelastograph (TEG) of the patients during the operation. After fetal delivery and umbilical cord clamping, according to the PA location and depth, patients are given local excision of the uterine wall, placenta evacuation, partial cystectomy, and bladder repair. 20 U of oxytocin and 250 μg of tromethamine are injected in the myometrium.

In the traditional group, patients are given a cesarean section without AABO. In this group, conservative treatments for PA, including oversewing of the placental bed, a uterine tamponade, and bilateral uterine artery, ligation are used. Hysterectomy is performed when massive hemorrhage cannot be controlled.

In the interventional group, the cesarean section and all endovascular procedures will be performed in a hybrid operation room equipped with a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) machine (Allura Xper FD20, Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Interventional radiologists will select the proper diameter of the balloon, which is measured by MRI, and insert a 5 F pigtail catheter (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) into the abdominal aorta at the level of T12 with an 8-F sheath (Cook) from the right femoral artery at the groin, with the patient under local anesthesia. Next, 5 ml iodixanol (Visipaque-320, Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) will be injected to locate the origin of the renal arteries. An 8-F, 40 × 14 mm, 40 × 16 mm, or 40 × 18 mm balloon catheter (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, AZ, USA) will be inserted into the infrarenal abdominal aorta and fixed carefully. Each patient will have peripheral oxygen saturation placed on the great toes of the left foot to allow the interventional radiologist to determine when balloon catheter occlusion of the aorta has occurred during the endovascular procedures. Indirectly confirmed balloon block effective indicators are as follows: the digit blood oxygen is reduced to zero, the blood oxygen curve is at a flat state, and the bipedal arterial blood pressure drops to zero [13, 21]. A sketch drawing of the abdominal aortic balloon position and related monitoring of physiological parameters during the operation is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Sketch of abdominal aortic balloon position and related physiological parameter monitoring

Temporary aortic balloon occlusion will be implemented by using 10–16 ml of saline solution immediately after fetal delivery and umbilical cord clamping. The balloons are inflated for 12–15 min, and the inflations are alternated with deflations of 1–2 min. As reported, it is safe to block the pelvic organs and lower limbs for 30 min [22]. After the operation, a pelvic angiography is performed again. If there is active bleeding, uterine artery embolization (UAE) is supplemented. The fluoroscopy time is recorded in all cases. When the operation is completed, the catheter is pulled out and compression bandaging of the femoral artery puncture sites is performed. The lower limbs of the patients are massaged after the operation. Low-molecular-weight heparin is given to the patients after 24 h to prevent vein thrombosis of the lower limbs.

Data collection

Primary outcome

The primary outcome is estimated blood loss (EBL). EBL is measured with reference to the collected blood in the suction bottle in the operating room and to the weight of the surgical swabs, excluding the volume of amniotic fluid.

Secondary outcomes

The following are the secondary outcomes of interest in the study:
  1. 1.

    Occurrence of cesarean hysterectomy (CH) during delivery

     
  2. 2.

    Blood transfusion volume

     
  3. 3.

    Neonate outcome: 1, 5 and 10 min Apgar scores

     
  4. 4.

    Operating time from the time of skin incision to abdominal closure

     
  5. 5.

    Balloon occlusion-relative data: balloon occlusion time, fetal radiation dose

     
  6. 6.

    Balloon occlusion-relative complications: vascular aneurysm, dissection or rupture, arterial embolism

     
  7. 7.

    Length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU)

     
  8. 8.

    Total hospital stay

     

Patient withdrawal

A participant or a patient’s relative who no longer agrees to participate in the study can withdraw at any time without need of further explanation. Patients who are withdrawn from the study protocol will not be followed up, and their data will not be analyzed. It is essential for the trial to collect as much data from each participant as possible.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated to compare two proportions with two-sample noninferiority or superiority. According to Muñoz et al., median blood loss was 2000 ml in parturients with PA during delivery [23]. The study of Panici et al. showed that median blood loss was 950 ml in parturients with AABO at cesarean section [24]. Considering a difference in volume of bleeding of 1000 ml with a standard deviation of 355 ml [13] in two treatment groups, a difference of 800 ml between two treatment groups is considered to be clinically important. Assuming the difference between two groups at a 2.5% significance level and a power of 0.90, 67 patients in each group are required for a comparison within the groups. Considering an estimated 20% dropout rate, 85 patients in each group for a total of 170 patients will be included in this study.

Statistics

An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to compare all primary and secondary outcomes in the future study. Continuous variables will be described as means ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables will be described as percentages. Demographic data, blood transfusion volume, operating time, length of stay in the ICU, total hospital stay, and EBL will be analyzed by Student’s t test to compare the two methods. The occurrence of CH during delivery will be compared by the chi-square test. The neonate Apgar scores will be analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

The statistical analyses will be carried out with SPSS software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical significance will be considered with a two-tailed P value <0.05 and a one-tailed P value <0.025.

Data processing and security monitoring

All data will be collected in accordance with the approved agreement and recorded separately. The Information Board (data monitoring committee, DMC) is composed of two senior professors, an epidemiologist, a biostatistics expert, and an ethical expert without any conflict of interest. Weekly meetings and public meetings are held to ensure data availability and scientific integrity while protecting patient safety. The main goals are to ensure the safety and interests of the subjects, the integrity and credibility of the study, and timely and accurate feedback to the clinical research related to the field. All treatment-related adverse events will be observed and reported by participants at each visit. In the event of serious adverse reactions, detailed reports will be drafted assessed on the basis of the protocol. Data and safety monitoring will be conducted regularly during the study period.

Discussion

So far, massive hemorrhage caused by PA during delivery is still a big challenge for obstetricians. In patients with PA, if the placenta does not completely separate from the uterus during delivery, massive obstetric hemorrhage will follow, leading to DIC and to a vicious circle of bleeding. When conservative treatments fail, traditional measures for massive obstetric hemorrhage include uterine artery ligation, internal iliac artery ligation, or even emergent hysterectomy. In the last 30–40 years, a new vascular interventional technique for treatment of obstetric hemorrhage has emerged. Pelvic arterial embolization and temporary occlusion of internal iliac arteries seem to be safe and effective for massive obstetric hemorrhage [25]. However, studies have yielded conflicting results. Some studies showed these treatments could reduce blood loss, others showed no benefits, and some even showed significant complications [26, 27].

The internal iliac artery is the main blood supply to the pelvic cavity. The uterine artery usually arises from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery, which is the main supply to the uterus. However, there are several other vascular territories that provide a rich collateral supply to the uterus, such as the ovarian artery, which arises from the abdominal aorta below the renal artery [2830]. So, theoretically, the abdominal aorta should be an ideal alternative site proposed for temporary occlusion, which may greatly diminish the collateral supply. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is not a new vascular interventional technique for controlling massive hemorrhage. An intraluminal aortic occlusion technique for controlling massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage was first reported by Edwards et al. in 1953 [31]. The endovascular balloon occlusion technique has been widely used in various types of major bleeding since Edwards’ report. The endovascular balloon occlusion technique has been successfully used in, e.g., trauma, aneurysm, artery dissection, and tumors, etc. [3234]. For different regions of the aortic blood supply, Stannard et al. described in detail how different types of aortal occlusion, from the chest, to the abdominal cavity, to the pelvic cavity, can be chosen to reduce bleeding [35]. Paull et al. first introduced the abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) technology into clinical practice in the obstetrics field to control intraoperative hemorrhage [21]. Up to now, less than ten studies, with small sample sizes, using the AABO technology have been reported [3640]. Although most of them showed positive results, all these studies were almost retrospective studies. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routinely using the AABO technology to control intraoperative hemorrhage in patients with PA. Therefore, we hope to carry out this prospective RCT study to confirm the effectiveness of the AABO technology in patients with PA.

Trial status

The study is not yet recruiting as of the date of publication.

Abbreviations

AABO: 

Abdominal aortic balloon occlusion

ABG: 

Arterial blood gas

ABP: 

Arterial blood pressure

CH: 

Cesarean hysterectomy

DIC: 

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

DSA: 

Digital subtraction angiography

EBL: 

Estimated blood loss

ECG: 

Electrocardiogram

IABO: 

Intra-aortic balloon occlusion

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

MOF: 

Multisystem organ failure

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

PA: 

Placenta accreta

RCT: 

Randomized controlled trial

RSI: 

Rapid sequence induction

SD: 

Standard deviation

TEG: 

Thrombelastograph

UAE: 

Uterine artery embolization

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to all participants in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University with reference number 30901413. Additional file 1 shows this in more detail.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

QC and WZ contributed to the conception and design. All authors contributed to the trial and give final approval of the manuscript. DS drafted the manuscript with LH and HW. QC, XZ, ZC, and YaW contributed to data acquisition and statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University with approval number 2016-16 and registered on 14 July 2016 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-16008842, http://www.chictr.org.cn). All patients will be informed of the severity of their condition, the treatment options, and the related risks. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants in the study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
(2)
Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
(3)
Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

References

  1. Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, Abuhamad AZ, Simhan H, Huls CK, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):561–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kume K, M Tsutsumi Y, Soga T, Sakai Y, Kambe N, Kawanishi R, et al. A case of placenta percreta with massive hemorrhage during cesarean section. J Med Invest. 2014;61(1-2):208–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbas F, Talati J, Wasti S, Akram S, Ghaffar S, Qureshi R. Placenta percreta with bladder invasion as a cause of life threatening hemorrhage. J Urol. 2000;164(4):1270–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kassem GA, Alzahrani AK. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa and placenta accreta: three years of experience with a two-consultant approach. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:803–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiefer N, Weber S. Postpartum hemorrhage. In: Vincent JL, editor. Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine 2013. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 19–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Woodring TC, Klauser CK, Bofill JA, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Prediction of placenta accreta by ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(1):118–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clausen C, Lönn L, Langhoff‐Roos J. Management of placenta percreta: a review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(2):138–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnevale FC, Kondo MM, de Oliveira Sousa Jr W, Santos AB, da Motta Leal Filho JM, Moreira AM, et al. Perioperative temporary occlusion of the internal iliac arteries as prophylaxis in cesarean section at risk of hemorrhage in placenta accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(4):758–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwata A, Murayama Y, Itakura A, Baba K, Seki H, Takeda S. Limitations of internal iliac artery ligation for the reduction of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean hysterectomy in cases of placenta previa accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(2):254–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cali G, Forlani F, Giambanco L, Amico ML, Vallone M, Puccio G, et al. Prophylactic use of intravascular balloon catheters in women with placenta accreta, increta and percreta. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:36–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Duan XH, Wang YL, Han XW, Chen ZM, Chu QJ, Wang L, et al. Caesarean section combined with temporary aortic balloon occlusion followed by uterine artery embolisation for the management of placenta accreta. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(9):932–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu Q, Liu Z, Zhao X, Liu C, Wang Y, Chu Q, et al. Outcome of pregnancies after balloon occlusion of the infrarenal abdominal aorta during caesarean in 230 patients with placenta praevia accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(11):1573–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, de Laveaucoupet J, Quéré MP, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94866.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mar WA, Berggruen S, Atueyi U, Sekhon S, Garzon SA, Knuttinen MG, et al. Ultrasound imaging of placenta accreta with MR correlation. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(1):23–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Snegovskikh D, Clebone A, Norwitz E. Anesthetic management of patients with placenta accreta and resuscitation strategies for associated massive hemorrhage. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(3):274–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuczkowski K. Cesarean hysterectomy in the parturient with abnormal placentation: evidence based strategy. Anestezjologia i Ratownictwo. 2009;3:296–303.Google Scholar
  19. Siddik S, Jalbout M, Baraka AS. Rapid sequence induction for cesarean section. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(4):569–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharp LM, Levy DM. Rapid sequence induction in obstetrics revisited. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(3):357–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Paull JD, Smith J, Williams L, Davison G, Devine T, Holt M. Balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta during caesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995;23(6):731–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Gribbin C, Siegel RL, Beale S, Scorza W. Balloon-assisted occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in patients with placenta accreta/percreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(3):354–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Muñoz LA, Mendoza GJ, Gomez M, Reyes LE, Arevalo JJ. Anesthetic management of placenta accreta in a low-resource setting: a case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24(4):329–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Panici PB, Anceschi M, Borgia ML, Bresadola L, Masselli G, Parasassi T, et al. Intraoperative aorta balloon occlusion: fertility preservation in patients with placenta previa accrete/increta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2512–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Salazar GM, Petrozza JC, Walker TG. Transcatheter endovascular techniques for management of obstetrical and gynecologic emergencies. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;12(2):139–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Maassen MS, Lambers MD, Tutein Nolthenius RP, van der Valk PH, Elgersma OE. Complications and failure of uterine artery embolisation for intractable postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2009;116:55–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Al-Thunyan A, Al-Meshal O, AlHussainan H, Al-Qahtani MH, El-Sayed AA, AlQattan MM. Buttock necrosis and paraplegia after bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:468–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Biko DM, Spanier JF, Nagamine M, Dwyer-Joyce L, Ball DS. Persistent secondary postpartum hemorrhage after uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(2):279–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang MQ, Liu FY, Duan F, Wang ZJ, Song P, Song L. Ovarian artery embolization supplementing hypogastric-uterine artery embolization for control of severe postpartum hemorrhage: report of eight cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7):971–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu FY, Wang MQ, Duan F, Wang ZJ, Song P. Ovarian artery supply is one of the factors affecting the interventional therapeutic efficacy of pelvic tumors. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009;31(1):62–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Edwards WS, Salter Jr PP, Carnaggio VA. Intraluminal aortic occlusions as a possible mechanism for controlling massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Surg Forum. 1953;4:496–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Okazaki K, Kamata Y, Tohdoh Y, Tsuchida H, Namiki A. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion of the descending thoracic aorta for intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Masui. 1999;48(12):1323–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott DJ, Eliason JL, Villamaria C, Morrison JJ, Houston 4th R, Spencer JR, et al. A novel fluoroscopy-free, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion system in a model of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(1):122–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang L, Gong Q, Xiao H, Tu C, Liu J. Control of blood loss during sacral surgery by aortic balloon occlusion. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(3):700–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stannard A, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct for hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1869–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bell-Thomas SM, Penketh RJ, Lord RH, Davies NJ, Collis R. Emergency use of a transfemoral aortic occlusion catheter to control massive haemorrhage at caesarean hysterectomy. BJOG. 2003;110(12):1120–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Harma M, Harma M, Kunt AS, Andac MH, Demir N. Balloon occlusion of the descending aorta in the treatment of severe post‐partum haemorrhage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44(2):170–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Andoh S, Mitani S, Nonaka A, et al. Use of temporary aortic balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta was useful during cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta. Masui. 2011;60(2):217–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Søvik E, Stokkeland P, Storm BS, Asheim P, Bolås O. The use of aortic occlusion balloon catheter without fluoroscopy for life threatening post-partum haemorrhage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(3):388–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Usman N, Noblet J, Low D, Thangaratinam S. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion without fluoroscopy for severe postpartum haemorrhage secondary to placenta percreta. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23(1):91–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement