Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A home-based exercise intervention for caregivers of persons with dementia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials201617:460

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1582-z

Received: 7 May 2016

Accepted: 27 August 2016

Published: 21 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Family members, who provide the majority of care for persons with dementia, are especially vulnerable to developing depression. Interventions targeting their depressive symptoms have been proposed but their efficacies vary considerably. It has been suggested that interventions carried out in the home setting and involving both caregivers and care recipients are more efficacious. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a home-based structured exercise programme involving both persons with dementia and their caregivers with nonexercise social contact control in treating depression among caregivers.

Methods/design

This is a parallel-group, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial. A total of 136 caregiver-care-recipient dyads (i.e. 272 participants in total) will be recruited and randomly allocated to either a home-based structured exercise (sitting Tai Chi) group or a social contact control group. The trial comprises a 3-month intervention phase followed by an extended observation phase of another 3 months. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 6th week, 12th week and 24th week. The primary outcome will be the reduction in depression among caregivers as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The secondary outcomes will be burden, quality of life, cognitive performance and balance ability of the caregivers, as well as the neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive function, balance and functional abilities of the persons with dementia. We will also examine whether the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene modulates mood changes in response to exercise.

Discussion

The findings offer a potential avenue of intervention by providing a low-cost, safe and effective treatment for depression among dementia caregivers, which may in turn also benefit the care recipients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02132039, registered on 28 April 2014.

Keywords

Home-based exercise Tai Chi Caregivers Dementia Depression Randomised controlled trial

Background

Dementia affects over 47 million people worldwide [1]. It causes decline in cognitive function, impairment in activities of daily living, and is associated with significant behavioural and psychological symptoms among the persons affected. Since the majority of dementia care is provided by family members [2], it is not surprising that they suffer from a high level of psychological distress and burden. It is now evident that informal caregivers of persons with dementia are at an elevated risk of developing depression and anxiety, and report poorer quality of life [35]. They also experience more stress than those who care for someone with physical disorders [6]. In a local study interviewing family caregivers of older adults with dementia in Hong Kong, they suffered significant stress and reported various negative emotions, conflicts between social roles, and difficulty in providing daily care and managing the care recipients’ behaviours [7]. Dementia caregiving has, therefore, emerged as a pressing health care issue.

In view of this, different interventions have been developed to alleviate depressive symptoms among caregivers of dementia persons. Recent reviews have analysed the efficacies of educational [8] and social support (e.g. befriending and peer support, family support and social network interventions, and support groups) [9], and psychological [10] and Internet-based interventions [11] for caregivers of persons with dementia. Though clinically meaningful, these interventions achieved only small effects [8, 11] or inconsistent results [9]. This may be partly because the programme goals and target groups were not clearly defined. Therefore, it has been suggested that research should focus on subgroups of caregivers such as depressed caregivers [12].

Among interventions for depression, exercise therapy has drawn much attention from researchers and practitioners. Exercise is a subset of physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive and purposeful, and regular exercise compares favourably to antidepressants as treatment for milder depression [13]. Though its antidepressant mechanism is not yet clear, evidence suggests that exercise improves mood by normalising brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels [14], modifying serotonin function and releasing endogenous opioids [15]. More recently, exercise is reported to reduce atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide, and to enhance copepetin and growth hormone among depressed individuals [16]. In addition, exercise improves one’s psychological and social sense of wellbeing [15]. It is, therefore, not surprising that a recent meta-analysis showed that exercise had a large and significant effect on depression (standardised mean deviation adjusted for publication bias = 1.11) with a fail-safe number of 1057 [17].

There has been emerging evidence supporting the effectiveness of exercise in treating depression in dementia caregivers. In a recent study, 17 caregivers participating in regular exercise of moderate intensity experienced less sense of burden and fatigue, and reported better sleep when compared with those in the control group [18]. Encouraging results have also been reported with endurance exercise [19], yoga [20], walking [21], and a combination of various physical activities [22].

However, the number of exercise studies for caregivers remains limited, and the sample sizes involved are usually small. This is probably related to the difficulty for dementia caregivers of participating in centre- or community-based exercise interventions because they are unable to find someone to take care of the care recipients, and lack time for additional activities [23]. In some previous studies, caregivers also voiced a preference for a programme that both caregiver and care recipient can participate in [22]. Home-based programmes involving both caregivers and care recipients may offer a possible solution [24]. Not only does the home-based dyadic intervention improve treatment adherence [25], it is also more successful in enhancing care-recipient function and reducing caregiver sense of burden [26].

We therefore propose to conduct the following assessor-blind randomised controlled trial of a home-based exercise intervention for both dementia caregivers and their care recipients.

Objectives

The objectives of the study are as follows:
  1. 1.
    To evaluate the effect of a home-based exercise programme on:
    1. (a).

      caregivers’ depression

       
    2. (b).

      caregivers’ burden, quality of life, cognitive performance and balance ability

       
    3. (c).

      neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive function, and balance and functional abilities among persons with dementia

       
     
  2. 2.

    To assess whether the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene modulates mood changes in response to exercise intervention

     

Methods/design

Design

This is a parallel-group, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial, which comprises a 3-month intervention phase followed by an extended observation phase lasting for 3 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the home-based structured exercise (intervention) or the standard nonexercise social contact (control) group. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02132039), and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval has been sought from respective Institutional Review Boards. All results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 Statement [27]. A CONSORT flow diagram of the study is depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram of the home-based exercise trial

Participants

Caregiver-care-recipient dyads will be recruited from psychogeriatric and geriatric outpatient clinics and various community centres for elders in Hong Kong by convenience sampling. Potential participants will be identified by the research team and screened for eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consent will be obtained from all eligible participants before enrollment.

Inclusion criteria

Caregivers:
  • Aged 50 years or above

  • Informal caregivers, i.e. unpaid family members who offer a substantial amount of care for the persons with dementia

  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [28] score >0 but <8 (i.e. the local cut-off score for clinically significant depression)

  • Understand Chinese

  • Receiving antidepressant treatment on a steady dose for at least 3 months (if applicable)

Care recipients:
  • Aged 60 years or above

  • Dementia diagnosis confirmed by a physician

  • Dependence in at least one of the activities of daily living (ADL)

  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) [29] score >10

Exclusion criteria

Both caregivers and care recipients:
  • No regular (i.e. at least three times/week) Tai Chi practice or other forms of mind-body exercise such as yoga, qigong, or mindfulness training in the past 6 months

  • Presence of any condition which renders participants unsuitable for physical training, for example, severe psychotic symptoms, imminently suicidal, significant orthopaedic problems, or unstable medical conditions

Randomisation and blinding

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group using a computer-generated block randomisation sequence (block sizes of 4). Randomisation will be performed by an independent team member who will not be involved in the recruitment, assessment, or delivery of the intervention. The allocation sequence will be concealed from the study investigators and research staff in sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes. The assessor for clinical parameters will be blinded to the randomisation status, and the trainer who conducts the intervention will be blinded to the assessment results.

Intervention

The intervention consists of eight home-based sessions of sitting Tai Chi. Tai Chi is a traditional Chinese exercise that combines rhythmic and flowing patterns of bodily movements with coordinated breathing and mindful meditation [30]. It is a moderate-intensity aerobic exercise at about 3 to 6 metabolic equivalents [31]. It has been successfully implemented in the local older population [32] and, as a low impact exercise, it is associated with a lower risk of musculoskeletal injury making it a suitable form of exercise for older adults. Since the current study includes persons with significant cognitive impairment, we adopt sitting Tai Chi which is a simpler version of Tai Chi developed by Hong Kong Polytechnic University [33]. The exercise consists of 12 steps, which include weight shifting in different sitting positions, trunk and upper limb movements, and alternate thigh lift in a smooth and coordinated manner [33].

Four weekly exercise sessions will be arranged over the first 4 weeks, and four more biweekly sessions over the next 8 weeks. Each session will last for 1 h, which starts with 10 min of warm-up activities followed by 40 min of sitting Tai Chi practice and, lastly, 10 min of cool-down exercises. The caregiver-care-recipient dyads will practise Tai Chi in their home under the instruction of a Tai Chi teacher with more than 20 years of teaching experience, and a trained research assistant. In order to monitor the progress and address participants’ concerns, biweekly phone contacts will be made during the study period (12 scheduled phone contacts in 24 weeks). On completion of the eight home-based Tai Chi sessions, participants will be given a manual and training video with detailed instructions of the Tai Chi poses to facilitate their continuation of Tai Chi practices.

A standard nonexercise social contact will be provided to the participants in the control group. Since social contact may be beneficial to one’s mood and may contribute to any improvement observed in the intervention group, we provide participants in the control group with a level of social contact equivalent to the intervention group. They will be visited by the research assistant eight times over 12 weeks. The visits involve a series of conversations related to neutral topics that are designed according to the principles of a befriending programme [34]. These topics are structured and standardised, and do not involve any topic concerning physical activity. Similar to the intervention group, 12 biweekly phone calls will be made during the study period to offer a comparable level of social contact.

Primary outcome

Participants will be assessed at baseline, 6th week, 12th week and 24th week for their responses to intervention. The assessment schedules for caregivers and care recipients are described in Table 1. The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of participants who are classified as responders by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) [35]. HAM-D-17 is a widely used and reliable measure of depressive symptoms. The scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater depression severity. Response to the intervention is defined as a reduction of the HAM-D-17 total score by ≥50 % from baseline to endpoint. Assessors will follow the structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (SIGH-D) when administering the HAM-D-17 [36].
Table 1

Assessment schedule for caregivers and care recipients

 

Baseline assessment

Week 6

Week 12

Week 24

Caregiver only

 GDS (screening only)

   

 HAM-D-17

 ZBI

 SF-12

 

 EXIT25

 

 IPIP

   

Care recipients only

 CSDD

 NPI

 

 DAD

 

 MBI

 

Caregivers and care recipients

 MMSE

 

 Digit span

 

 Delayed recall

 

 CVFT

 

 BBS

 

 FR

 

 TUG

 

 Logbook

 Pedometer

BDNF genotype

   

 Body weight and height

 

 Blood pressure and pulse

 

BBS Berg Balance Scale, BDNF brain-derived neurotrophic factor, CSDD Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, CVFT Category Verbal Fluency Test, DAD Disability Assessment for Dementia, EXIT25 Executive Interview, FR Functional Reach, GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, HAM-D-17 Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, IPIP International Personality Item Pool, MBI Modified Barthel Index, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, NPI Neuropsychiatric Inventory, TUG Timed Up and Go, ZBI Zarit Burden Interview

Assessment for caregivers only:
  1. 1.

    The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) [37] is a 22-item self-administrated questionnaire specially designed to measure the stresses experienced by caregivers of persons with dementia. Caregivers will assess the impact of the patient’s disabilities on their life

     
  2. 2.

    The SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) [38] measures the health-related quality of life and gives two component scores: a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS)

     
  3. 3.

    The Executive Interview (EXIT25) [39] is a 25-item screening instrument developed to assess executive cognitive dysfunction

     
  4. 4.

    The International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) [40] consists of 50 items assessing the ‘Big Five’ personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism

     
Assessment for care recipients only:
  1. 1.

    The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) [41] is a clinician-rated instrument measuring depressive symptoms in persons with cognitive impairment

     
  2. 2.

    The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [42] assesses the frequency and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms across 12 domains including psychotic features, mood changes, activities disturbances and vegetative symptoms

     
  3. 3.

    The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) [43] evaluates functional abilities in both basic and instrumental activities of daily living in people with dementia

     
  4. 4.

    The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) [44] measures individuals’ performance on 10 activities of daily living: eating, personal hygiene, bathing, toileting, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, transfers, walking, and stair climbing

     
Assessment for both caregivers and care recipients:
  1. 1.

    Sociodemographic information includes age, gender, education level and marital status

     
  2. 2.

    Lifestyle factors such as smoking, drinking, and sleeping habits. Health-related information like chronic health problems and medications will also be recorded. Resting blood pressure and heart rate will be taken. Body height and weight will also be measured to calculate Body Mass Index

     
  3. 3.

    Global cognitive function will be measured by the MMSE [29], digit span, delayed recall, and the Category Verbal Fluency Test (CVFT) [45]

     
  4. 4.

    Balance ability and functional mobility will be measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [46], the Functional Reach (FR) test [47], and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test [48]

     
  5. 5.

    Physical activity and programme adherence will be assessed using logbook recordings. Before each assessment, participants will be asked to wear a pedometer for 1 week. Number of walking steps, history of falls, frequency, duration, and type of exercises during the week will be recorded in the logbook

     
  6. 6.

    Physiological markers – to examine the role of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in the antidepressant effect of exercise, buccal swabs will be collected at the baseline assessment

     

Sample size calculation

The sample size is calculated by the proportion of caregivers who respond to the intervention as indicated by the HAM-D-17. Taking reference of the previous study [49], we expect a 30 % reduction in the proportion of participants rated as depressed in the control group with social contact only. Assuming that a further 30 % reduction is achieved by sitting Tai Chi, we need 56 caregiver-care-recipient dyads (i.e. 112 participants) in each arm to identify a significant effect at a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and 80 % power. Allowing for 20 % dropout, the number of dyads in each arm will rise to 68. A total number of participants of 272 will be recruited.

Statistical analyses

Baseline differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the intervention and control groups will be evaluated by chi-square and independent sample t tests. All data will be analysed using the intent-to-treat principle. For outcome measures that are not normally distributed (e.g. the HAM-D-17), log transformation will be applied to perform the analyses. Mixed-effects models will be fitted for each outcome measure using baseline, 6th, 12th and 24th week follow-up data. Possible confounding factors such as sex, age, and use of antidepressant medication will be treated as time-dependent covariate in the mixed-effects models. If applicable, subgroup analysis will be carried out to estimate whether there is any gender difference (female versus male caregivers) regarding the effect of the intervention in alleviating depressive symptoms. Fixed effects for time, intervention group, and their interactions will be examined and unstructured covariance structure will be employed to account for the within-subject correlation over time. Levels of significance will be set at p < 0.05. All analyses will be performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Discussion

Since the prevalence of dementia doubles every 5 years after the age of 60, population ageing inevitably increases the number of persons with dementia. Hong Kong is no exception to this trend. It is estimated that around one in 10 local older persons are now suffering from dementia [50].

Caregiving for persons with dementia is demanding and challenging. Evidence shows that it adversely affects caregivers’ physical [51] as well as mental wellbeing [35], including a vulnerability to developing depression. In a review of 10 studies involving 790 caregivers of persons with dementia, more than one fifth of them suffered from a depressive disorder [3]. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among caregivers is even higher [14].

This study will investigate the efficacy of a structured exercise programme in alleviating depressive symptoms among caregivers of persons with dementia. We focus on caregivers with depressive symptoms instead of depressive disorders as the former constitute the largest group of depressed caregivers. Besides, because of ethical concerns, we will refer those who suffer from clinically significant depression to appropriate agencies for psychiatric assessment and treatment.

The intervention is tailor-made for family caregivers in three ways. First, the programme is delivered at participants’ homes to facilitate their participation. Second, both caregivers and care recipients will be involved in the study. Third, a moderate-intensity aerobic exercise that has been successfully implemented in the local older population (i.e. sitting Tai Chi) is chosen as the intervention.

Sitting Tai Chi is a safe, low-impact and low-cost exercise intervention. If it is shown to improve caregivers’ mood, it will offer a potentially effective treatment alternative for depression among caregivers of persons with dementia. In addition, we expect that home-based exercise will also benefit the care recipients.

Trial status

The study is still recruiting at the time of submission.

Abbreviations

ADL: 

Activities of daily living

BBS: 

Berg Balance Scale

BDNF: 

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

CONSORT: 

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

CSDD: 

Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia

CVFT: 

Category Verbal Fluency Test

DAD: 

Disability Assessment for Dementia

EXIT25: 

Executive Interview

FR: 

Functional Reach

GDS: 

Geriatric Depression Scale

HAM-D-17: 

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

IPIP: 

International Personality Item Pool

MBI: 

Modified Barthel Index

MCS: 

Mental component summary

MMSE: 

Mini Mental State Examination

NPI: 

Neuropsychiatric Inventory

PCS: 

Physical component summary

REC: 

Research Ethics Committee

SF-12: 

SF-12 Health Survey

SIGH-D: 

Structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

TUG: 

Timed Up and Go

ZBI: 

Zarit Burden Interview

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere thanks to our Tai Chi teacher Mr. Charles Lee for agreeing to take part in the study. We would also like to thank the social centres and clinics for their valuable support in participant recruitment. In addition, we are grateful to Mrs Eleanor Chan and Mrs Miranda Tung for their advice on the assessment methods.

Funding

The study is supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund of Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (Ref: 11121441).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

WCC conceived the idea for the study, obtained funding, and took primary responsibility for study coordination and manuscript preparation. NL, BD, SLM and LCWL obtained funding and contributed to the concept and design of the study, intervention and outcome assessment. CSMW contributed to the coordination of the study, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval has been sought from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 13-453), Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2014.254-T), New Territories West Cluster Clinical and Research Ethics Committee (REC) (NTWC/CREC/1302/14), Kowloon West Cluster REC (KW-EX-15-076-86-12TCM), and Hong Kong East Cluster REC (HKEC-2015-045). Participation in the study is completely voluntary. Participants will be able to withdraw from it at any time. The decision to participate or withdraw will not affect their existing treatment or service received. Caregivers who are found to have significant depressive symptoms or other mental health problems will be referred to appropriate health services for follow-up. All personal information collected will be kept strictly confidential and used for research purposes only. Research team members will be responsible for safekeeping the personal data. Only the principal investigator and designated research staff will have access to the interim results and final trial dataset. Informed consent will be obtained from all eligible participants before enrollment.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
(2)
Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne
(3)
NorthWestern Aged Mental Health
(4)
School of Clinical Neurosciences and the Western Australia Centre and Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia
(5)
National Ageing Research Institute, The University of Melbourne
(6)
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po Hospital

References

  1. World Health Organization. The epidemiology and impact of dementia: current state and future trends. Geneva; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/dementia_thematicbrief_epidemiology.pdf. Accessed date 8 Apr 2016.
  2. Chan SW. Family caregiving in dementia: the Asian perspective of a global problem. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(6):469–78. doi:10.1159/000322086. Epub 20 Jan 2011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuijpers P. Depressive disorders in caregivers of dementia patients: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9(4):325–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mahoney R, Regan C, Katona C, Livingston G. Anxiety and depression in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: the LASER-AD study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13(9):795–801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ho SC, Chan A, Woo J, Chong P, Sham A. Impact of caregiving on health and quality of life: a comparative population-based study of caregivers for elderly persons and noncaregivers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(8):873–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ory MG, Hoffman RR, Yee JL, Tennstedt S, Schulz R. Prevalence and impact of caregiving: a detailed comparison between dementia and nondementia caregivers. Gerontologist. 1999;39(2):177–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan WC, Ng C, Mok CCM, Wong FLF, Pang SL, Chiu HFK. Lived experience of caregivers of persons with dementia in Hong Kong: a qualitative study. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2010;20(4):163–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen M, Agbata IN, Canavan M, McCarthy G. Effectiveness of educational interventions for informal caregivers of individuals with dementia residing in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(2):130–43. Epub 2014/10/30. eng.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dam AE, de Vugt ME, Klinkenberg IP, Verhey FR, van Boxtel MP. A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: are they doing what they promise? Maturitas. 2016;85:117–30. Epub 2016/02/10. eng.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elvish R, Lever S-J, Johnstone J, Cawley R, Keady J. Psychological interventions for carers of people with dementia: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Couns Psychother Res. 2013;13(2):106–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Boots LM, de Vugt ME, van Knippenberg RJ, Kempen GI, Verhey FR. A systematic review of Internet-based supportive interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29(4):331–44. Epub 2013/08/22. eng.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smits CHM, de Lange J, Dröes R-M, Meiland F, Vernooij-Dassen M, Pot AM. Effects of combined intervention programmes for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(12):1181–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carek PJ, Laibstain SE, Carek SM. Exercise for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2011;41(1):15–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Fazio P, Ciambrone P, Cerminara G, Barbuto E, Bruni A, Gentile P, et al. Depressive symptoms in caregivers of patients with dementia: demographic variables and burden. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1085–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Stathopoulou G, Powers MB, Berry AC, Smits JAJ, Otto MW. Exercise interventions for mental health: a quantitative and qualitative review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2006;13(2):179–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuch FB, Deslandes AC, Stubbs B, Gosmann NP, Silva CTB, Fleck MPA. Neurobiological effects of exercise on major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;2(61):1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Richards J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Exercise as a treatment for depression: a meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;77:42–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirano A, Suzuki Y, Kuzuya M, Onishi J, Ban N, Umegaki H. Influence of regular exercise on subjective sense of burden and physical symptoms in community-dwelling caregivers of dementia patients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;53(2):e158–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. King AC, Baumann K, O’Sullivan P, Wilcox S, Castro C. Effects of moderate-intensity exercise on physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to family caregiving: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(1):M26–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Waelde LC, Thompson L, Gallagher-Thompson D. A pilot study of a yoga and meditation intervention for dementia caregiver stress. J Clin Psychol. 2004;60(6):677–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowery D, Cerga-Pashoja A, Iliffe S, Thuné-Boyle I, Griffin M, Lee J, et al. The effect of exercise on behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: the EVIDEM-E randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29(8):819–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill K, Smith R, Fearn M, Rydberg M, Oliphant R. Physical and psychological outcomes of a supported physical activity program for older carers. J Aging Phys Act. 2007;15(3):257–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Etkin CD, Farran CJ, Barnes LL, Shah RC. Recruitment and enrollment of caregivers for a lifestyle physical activity clinical trial. Res Nurs Health. 2012;35(1):70–81. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3729020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gitlin LN, Hodgson NA, Choi SSW. Home-based interventions targeting persons with dementia: what is the evidence and where do we go from here? In: Boltz M, Galvin JE, editors. Switzerland: Dementia care: an evidence-based approach: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 167-88.Google Scholar
  25. Steinberg M, Leoutsakos JMS, Podewils LJ, Lyketsos CG. Evaluation of a home-based exercise program in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: the Maximizing Independence in Dementia (MIND) study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(7):680–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Thinnes A, Padilla R. Effect of educational and supportive strategies on the ability of caregivers of people with dementia to maintain participation in that role. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(5):541–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2860339.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee HCB, Chiu HFK, Kwok WY, Leung CM, Kwong PK, Chung DWS. Chinese elderly and the GDS short form: a preliminary study. Clin Gerontologist. 1993;14(2):37–42.Google Scholar
  29. Chiu HF, Lee H, Chung W, Kwong P. Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of Mini-mental State Examination: a preliminary study. J Hong Kong Coll Psychiatry. 1994;4 Suppl 2:25–8.Google Scholar
  30. Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch, Department of Health, HKSAR. Tai Chi for health. Non-Communicable Disease Watch. 2012;5(4):1–6.Google Scholar
  31. Li JX, Hong Y, Chan KM. Tai chi: physiological characteristics and beneficial effects on health. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35(3):148–56. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1724328.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lam LC, Chau RC, Wong BM, Fung AW, Tam CW, Leung GT, et al. A 1- year randomized controlled trial comparing mind body exercise (Tai Chi) with stretching and toning exercise on cognitive function in older Chinese adults at risk of cognitive decline. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(6):568.e15-20.Google Scholar
  33. Lee KY, Jones AY, Hui-Chan CW, Tsang WW. Kinematics and energy expenditure of sitting t’ai chi. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(8):665–8. Epub 2011/07/08. eng.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bendall S, Killackey E, Jackson H, Gleeson J. Befriending manual. University of Melbourne: OXYGEN Research Centre; 2003.Google Scholar
  35. Zheng YP, Zhao JP, Phillips M, Liu JB, Cai MF, Sun SQ, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1988;152:660–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams JB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(8):742–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chan TSF, Lam LCW, Chiu HFK. Validation of the Chinese version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Hong Kong J Psychiatry. 2005;15(1):9–13.Google Scholar
  38. Lam CLK, Tse EYY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):539–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chan SMS, Chiu FKH, Lam CWL. Correlational study of the Chinese version of the Executive Interview (C-EXIT25) to other cognitive measures in a psychogeriatric population in Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(6):535–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zheng L, Goldberg LR, Zheng Y, Zhao Y, Tang Y, Liu L. Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;45(7):649–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin JN, Wang JJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. J Nurs Res. 2008;16(3):202–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Leung VP, Lam LC, Chiu HF, Cummings JL, Chen QL. Validation study of the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (CNPI). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16(8):789–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mok CCM, Siu AMH, Chan WC, Yeung KM, Pan PC, Li S-W. Functional disabilities profile of Chinese elderly people with Alzheimer’s disease—a validation study on the Chinese version of the disability assessment for dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;20(2-3):112–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Leung SOC, Chan CCH, Shah S. Development of a Chinese version of the modified Barthel Index—validity and reliability. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(10):912–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mok EHL, Lam LCW, Chiu HFK. Category verbal fluency test performance in Chinese elderly with Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18(2):120–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83 Suppl 2:S7–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):M192–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kerse N, Hayman KJ, Moyes SA, Peri K, Robinson E, Dowell A, et al. Home-based activity program for older people with depressive symptoms: DeLLITE—a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(3):214–23. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2866718.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Lam LCW, Tam CWC, Lui VWC, Chan WC, Chan SSM, Wong S, et al. Prevalence of very mild and mild dementia in community-dwelling older Chinese people in Hong Kong. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20(1):135–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Patterson TL, Grant I. Interventions for caregiving in dementia: physical outcomes. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2003;16(6):629–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement