Skip to main content

Erratum to: ‘Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated botulinum toxin treatment model for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm compared to standard care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial’

Erratum

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. In the Trial registration section the Clinicaltrials.ogv ID was included incorrectly as NCT102577224. The Correct ID is NCT02577224. There will also be an update to correct this error.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Wickwar S, McBain H, Newman SP, Hirani SP, Hurt C, Dunlop N, Flood C, Ezra DG. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated botulinum toxin treatment model for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm compared to standard care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel G. Ezra.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1263-y.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wickwar, S., McBain, H., Newman, S.P. et al. Erratum to: ‘Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated botulinum toxin treatment model for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm compared to standard care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial’. Trials 17, 333 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1502-2

Download citation