Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of acute effect of light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy on muscle deoxygenation and pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in patients with diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is responsible for a significant reduction in the quality of life due to its negative impact on functional capacity. Cardiopulmonary fitness impairment in DM patients has been associated with limited tissue oxygenation. Phototherapy is widely utilized to treat several disorders due to expected light-tissue interaction. This type of therapy may help to improve muscular oxygenation, thereby increasing aerobic fitness and functional capacity.

Methods/Design

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Four separate tests will be performed to evaluate the acute effect of phototherapy. All participants will receive both interventions in random order: light-emitting diode therapy (LEDT) and placebo, with a minimum 14-day interval between sessions (washout period). Immediately after the intervention, participants will perform moderate constant workload cycling exercise corresponding to 80 % of the pulmonary oxygen uptake \( \left({\mathrm{p}\overset{\cdotp }{\mathrm{V}}\mathrm{O}}_2\right) \) during the gas exchange threshold (GET). LEDT will be administered with a multidiode cluster probe (50 GaAIA LEDs, 850 ηm, 75 mW each diode, and 3 J per point) before each exercise session. Pulmonary oxygen uptake, muscle oxygenation, heart rate, and arterial pressure will be measured using a computerized metabolic cart, a near-infrared spectrometer, an electrocardiogram, and a photoplethysmography system, respectively.

Discussion

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the acute effects of muscular pre-conditioning using LED phototherapy on pulmonary oxygen uptake, muscle oxygenation, heart rate, and arterial pressure dynamics during dynamic moderate exercise. We hypothesize that phototherapy may be beneficial to optimize aerobic fitness in the DM population. Data will be published after the study is completed.

Trial registration

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under trial number NCT01889784 (date of registration 5 June 2013).

Peer Review reports

Background

Type 2 diabetes (DM) is a significant health problem worldwide due to its high prevalence and mortality [1]. It is characterized by hyperglycemia caused by defects in insulin secretion and/or insulin action. DM is associated with many well-known chronic comorbidities and complications that compromise many tissues, especially the blood vessels, heart, and nerves [2].

Individuals with DM have reduced aerobic fitness characterized by lower peak pulmonary oxygen uptake \( \left(p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2\right) \) [36]. In addition, \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) kinetics analysis has been used to characterize \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) dynamics during submaximal exercise transitions [5, 7]. The \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) kinetics during exercise transitions are related to the cardiorespiratory system’s ability to offer O2 and the capacity of the exercising muscle to utilize this O2 [5, 7]. DM patients have delayed \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) response after the onset of light to moderate exercise [5, 8] and premature muscular fatigue [9] in comparison with a control group. Many potential mechanisms could explain these impaired responses, for example, reduced muscle blood flow [10] and capillary density [11], defects in muscular oxygen diffusion, and lower mitochondrial oxygen utilization [5] and function [9, 12, 13].

Phototherapy is a widely used resource due to its effect on biological tissues, potentially improving muscular efficiency and aerobic fitness [1418]. Studies with animals have shown enhanced mitochondrial function [19, 20], microcirculation, and tissue oxygenation [21, 22] mediated by phototherapy. Additionally, studies with healthy humans demonstrate improvements in muscular function, fatigue resistance, \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \), and exercise tolerance [17, 23] and decreased concentrations of lactate and muscle damage markers [2326].

DM patients have an impaired ability to deliver oxygen (O2) to the muscle and possibly to use this O2 during exercise, which leads to an imbalance between muscle blood flow and \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) [27], resulting in hampered \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) dynamics. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to evaluate the acute effects of LED phototherapy on muscle oxygenation and \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) kinetics in individuals with DM during moderate cycling exercise. We hypothesize that phototherapy will promote therapeutic effects such as improved aerobic fitness, which could ultimately lead to better functional capacity.

Methods/Design

Design

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial approved by the Ethics Committee of Federal University of São Carlos (number 13573013.1.0000.5504) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under Trial Number NCT01889784. This study will be conducted in accordance with the human research standards set out by the National Health Council Resolution 196/96. The subjects will be included in the study after providing written informed consent.

The subjects will be divided into two groups: DM group (DMG) and healthy group (HG). After screening, the subjects of both groups who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to one of two subgroups (A and B) as described in Fig. 1a. Four separate tests will be conducted to evaluate the acute effect of phototherapy. All subjects will receive both interventions, light-emitting diode therapy (LEDT) and placebo, with a minimum 14-day interval between sessions (washout period). The subgroups will determine the intervention order because the interventions will be alternated in each visit (Fig. 1b). The subjects in subgroup A will receive LEDT in the first and third sessions and placebo in the second and fourth sessions. Subjects in subgroup B will receive the reverse order. The researcher responsible for the randomization process will also prepare the LEDT device (effective or placebo) before each visit and will not analyze the data.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design flowchart. Screening and group/subgroup allocation are described in a. The intervention order of the study is described in b. DMG, diabetes mellitus group; HG, healthy group

Subjects

All subjects must be free of overt coronary disease, and they must be between 40 and 64 years of age. DM individuals must have a diagnosis according to the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association [2]. The groups will be matched by age and body mass index (BMI). To achieve that, we will first screen and test the DMG, then evaluate the control group matching age and BMI.

Exclusion criteria are BMI > 35 kg/m2, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) > 3.0 mg/L, smoking, anemia, alcoholism, use of anti-inflammatory or inhalable drugs, known respiratory and inflammatory diseases, congestive heart failure, and disability conditions that preclude exercise. Healthy subjects will be excluded if they have direct family members with DM.

Sample characterization

Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma insulin level, fasting plasma glucose, plasma concentration of CRP, and lipid profile will be measured after 10 to 12 hours of fasting using the analyzer ADVIA 1800 Chemistry System (Siemens, Tarrytown, NY, USA). The degree of insulin resistance will be determined at baseline by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), according to the formula: HOMA-IR = fasting plasma insulin (μU/ml) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)/22.5 [28]. Body composition will be evaluated by tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance analysis (model BC-558, Tanita Corporation of America Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA) which calculates body fat, total body water, muscle mass, visceral fat, and bone mass. The subjects will be required to avoid eating and drinking for 4 hours and to urinate prior to the assessment.

Protocol

Following the screening session, the subjects will return to the laboratory on 5 different days (Fig. 2). They will be asked to avoid alcohol and caffeine and refrain from exercise for 24 hours before testing. All tests will take place in the morning, at the same time of the day.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental protocol flowchart. LEDT, light-emitting diode therapy

On the first day, incremental exercise on a cycloergometer (Quinton Corival 400, Seattle, WA, USA) will be performed to determine the gas exchange threshold (GET) and peak \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \). Subjects should maintain a cycling cadence of approximately 60 rpm. The workload increment will be determined for each subject in accordance with Wasserman et al. [29]. The GET will be determined by three independent observers according to the ventilatory method [29]. The peak \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) will be the mean \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) value of the last 30 seconds during the incremental exercise. It will be assumed that peak \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) has been achieved when the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) at exercise peak reaches a value higher than 1.1 [30].

After that, the subjects will return to the laboratory four more times to receive the muscular pre-conditioning intervention (LEDT or placebo) according to the randomization. Immediately after the intervention, the subjects will perform moderate constant workload cycling exercise corresponding to 80 % of the \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) during the GET. The LEDT will be administered with a multidiode cluster probe (50 GaAIA LEDs, 850 ηm, 75 mW each diode, and 3 J per point) before each exercise session. The probe will be in direct contact with skin bilaterally for 40 seconds, delivering 150 J of total energy to each quadriceps and triceps surae muscle. Placebo will follow the same procedure, but, the LEDT device will be turned off.

The constant workload exercise protocol will be preceded by a resting period and 3 minutes of freewheel pedaling. Afterwards, 6 minutes of exercise at target workload will be performed followed by a 6-minute cool-down period of freewheel pedaling.

Measurements

The \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \), carbon dioxide output (pVCO 2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory exchange rate (RER) will be measured breath-by-breath using a computerized metabolic cart (Vmax29c, Sensor Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) previously calibrated for each session.

Electrocardiography (ECG) will be continuously recorded (CM5 lead) with a bioamplifier (BioAmp Power Lab, ADInstruments, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) and a data acquisition system (Power Lab, ADInstruments, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia). Heart rate (HR) will be estimated based on the ECG signal. Finger arterial pressure will be measured using a photoplethysmography system (Finometer Pro, Finapres Medical System, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The finger cuff will be placed on the middle finger of the left hand. To correct the hydrostatic pressure changes related to the heart, a height correction will be used as recommended by the manufacturer [31].

Local tissue oxygenation of the vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialis of the right leg will be measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (Oxymon, Artinis Medical Systems, Nijmegen, Netherlands). NIRS provides measurements of changes in concentrations of deoxygenated and oxygenated hemoglobin (HHb and O2Hb, respectively). In addition, the tissue saturation index (TSI) will be measured. To avoid any motion artifact and ambient light influences, the probe will be fixed by tape and then a dark cloth will be gently wrapped around the thigh and calf region.

Before and after the constant workload exercise protocol, blood samples will be collected via earlobe puncture in order to verify lactate and glucose using an automated glucose analyzer (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS – Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) that has been previously calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Data analysis procedures

The \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) and NIRS data collected during constant workload exercise will be submitted to time domain kinetics analysis as previously described [5, 3234]. The data obtained in the two repetitions of the same constant workload protocol for each intervention (LEDT or placebo) will be time-aligned and second-by-second interpolated; then, the point-by-point mean between tests will be finally submitted to kinetics analysis.

Statistical analysis

The data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation values. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests will be used to test the data for Gaussian distribution and variance, respectively. The statistics analysis will be performed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test for intergroup, intragroup, and multiple comparisons. The level of significance will be set at 5 % (p < 0.05). The statistical power will be set at 0.80, which is the minimal value recommended in the literature to minimize type II error.

Discussion

The chronic effect of phototherapy has been widely studied and shows promising results related to increased peak \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \), reduction in fatigue, and lactate and C-reactive protein concentrations [23, 2426]. This novel therapeutic tool is generally studied in healthy participants [17, 18, 23, 25, 26]; however, the acute effects of phototherapy are still unknown in DM and its impact on \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) dynamics still needs further clarification.

The effects of LEDT could be beneficial to the DM population because the exercise intolerance of this population decreases quality of life and further increases cardiovascular risk. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the acute effects of LEDT on \( p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2 \) dynamics in subjects with DM and healthy age- and sex-matched subjects. The results will elucidate the effects of LEDT and may support the use of this therapy in individuals with DM.

Data will be published after the study is completed.

Trial status

Patient recruitment is currently underway.

Abbreviations

BMI:

body mass index

DM:

Type 2 diabetes

DMG:

Type 2 diabetes group

ECG:

electrocardiogram

GET:

gas exchange threshold

HbA1c :

glycohemoglobin

HHb:

deoxygenated hemoglobin

HG:

healthy group

(HOMA-IR):

homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

HR:

heart rate

hs-CRP:

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

LED:

light emitting diode

LEDT:

light-emitting diode therapy

NIRS:

near-infrared spectroscopy

O2 :

oxygen

O2Hb:

oxygenated hemoglobin

pVCO2 :

carbon dioxide output

\( \left(p\overset{\cdotp }{V}{O}_2\right) \) :

pulmonary oxygen uptake

RER:

respiratory exchange ratio

TSI:

tissue saturation index

VE:

minute ventilation

References

  1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year, and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;2000:1047–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Expert Committee on the D, Classification of Diabetes M. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26 Suppl 1:S5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seyoum B, Estacio RO, Berhanu P, Schrier RW. Exercise capacity is a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006;3:197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadeau KJ, Zeitler PS, Bauer TA, Brown MS, Dorosz JL, Draznin B, et al. Insulin resistance in adolescents with type 2 diabetes is associated with impaired exercise capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3687–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Brandenburg SL, Sippel JM, Vogelsong AM, et al. Abnormal oxygen uptake kinetic responses in women with type II diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:310–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Francisco CO, Catai AM, Moura-Tonello SC, Lopes SL, Benze BG, Del Vale AM, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness, pulmonary function and C-reactive protein levels in nonsmoking individuals with diabetes. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014;47:426–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughson RL. Oxygen uptake kinetics: historical perspective and future directions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34:840–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Regensteiner JG, Sippel J, McFarling ET, Wolfel EE, Hiatt WR. Effects of non-insulin-dependent diabetes on oxygen consumption during treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27:875–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheuermann-Freestone M, Madsen PL, Manners D, Blamire AM, Buckingham RE, Styles P, et al. Abnormal cardiac and skeletal muscle energy metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2003;107:3040–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kingwell BA, Formosa M, Muhlmann M, Bradley SJ, McConell GK. Type 2 diabetic individuals have impaired leg blood flow responses to exercise: role of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:899–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. He J, Watkins S, Kelley DE. Skeletal muscle lipid content and oxidative enzyme activity in relation to muscle fiber type in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Diabetes. 2001;50:817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dumas JF, Simard G, Flamment M, Ducluzeau PH, Ritz P. Is skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction a cause or an indirect consequence of insulin resistance in humans? Diabetes Metab. 2009;35:159–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yokota T, Kinugawa S, Hirabayashi K, Matsushima S, Inoue N, Ohta Y, et al. Oxidative stress in skeletal muscle impairs mitochondrial respiration and limits exercise capacity in type 2 diabetic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1069–1077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baroni BM, Rodrigues R, Freire BB, Franke Rde A, Geremia JM, Vaz MA. Effect of low-level laser therapy on muscle adaptation to knee extensor eccentric training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015, 115:639-647.

  15. Miranda EF, de Oliveira LV, Antonialli FC, Vanin AA, de Carvalho Pde T, Leal-Junior EC. Phototherapy with combination of super-pulsed laser and light-emitting diodes is beneficial in improvement of muscular performance (strength and muscular endurance), dyspnea, and fatigue sensation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lasers Med Sci 2015, 30:437-43.

  16. Paolillo FR, Corazza AV, Borghi-Silva A, Parizotto NA, Kurachi C, Bagnato VS. Infrared LED irradiation applied during high-intensity treadmill training improves maximal exercise tolerance in postmenopausal women: a 6-month longitudinal study. Lasers Med Sci. 2013, 28:415-22.

  17. Ferraresi C, de Brito Oliveira T, de Oliveira Zafalon L, de Menezes Reiff RB, Baldissera V, de Andrade Perez SE, et al. Effects of low level laser therapy (808 nm) on physical strength training in humans. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:349–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferraresi C, Beltrame T, Fabrizzi F, Nascimento ES, Karsten M, Francisco CO, et al. Muscular pre-conditioning using light-emitting diode therapy (LEDT) for high-intensity exercise: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with a single elite runner. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:354–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayworth CR, Rojas JC, Padilla E, Holmes GM, Sheridan EC, Gonzalez-Lima F. In vivo low-level light therapy increases cytochrome oxidase in skeletal muscle. Photochem Photobiol. 2010;86:673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferraresi C, Kaippert B, Avci P, Huang YY, de Sousa MV, Bagnato VS, et al. Low-level Laser (Light) Therapy Increases Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and ATP Synthesis in C2C12 Myotubes with a Peak Response at 3–6 h. Photochem Photobiol. 2015;91:411–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maegawa Y, Itoh T, Hosokawa T, Yaegashi K, Nishi M. Effects of near-infrared low-level laser irradiation on microcirculation. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;27:427–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ihsan FR. Low-level laser therapy accelerates collateral circulation and enhances microcirculation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23:289–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Marchi T, Leal Junior EC, Bortoli C, Tomazoni SS, Lopes-Martins RA, Salvador M. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in human progressive-intensity running: effects on exercise performance, skeletal muscle status, and oxidative stress. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leal Junior EC, Lopes-Martins RA, Frigo L, De Marchi T, Rossi RP, de Godoi V, et al. Effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the development of exercise-induced skeletal muscle fatigue and changes in biochemical markers related to postexercise recovery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:524–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leal Junior EC, Lopes-Martins RA, Rossi RP, De Marchi T, Baroni BM, de Godoi V, et al. Effect of cluster multi-diode light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) on exercise-induced skeletal muscle fatigue and skeletal muscle recovery in humans. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leal Junior EC, Lopes-Martins RA, Baroni BM, De Marchi T, Taufer D, Manfro DS, et al. Effect of 830 nm low-level laser therapy applied before high-intensity exercises on skeletal muscle recovery in athletes. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:857–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Levi M, Regensteiner JG. Skeletal muscle deoxygenation after the onset of moderate exercise suggests slowed microvascular blood flow kinetics in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2880–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, et al. Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:191–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. FMS. User's Guide. Amsterdam: Finapres Medical Systems BV; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkerson DP, Poole DC, Jones AM, Fulford J, Mawson DM, Ball CI, et al. Older type 2 diabetic males do not exhibit abnormal pulmonary oxygen uptake and muscle oxygen utilization dynamics during submaximal cycling exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;300:R685–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spencer MD, Murias JM, Kowalchuk JM, Paterson DH. Effect of moderate-intensity work rate increment on phase II tauVO(2), functional gain and Delta[HHb]. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113:545–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spencer MD, Murias JM, Kowalchuk JM, Paterson DH. Pulmonary O(2) uptake and muscle deoxygenation kinetics are slowed in the upper compared with lower region of the moderate-intensity exercise domain in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:2139–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has the financial support of São Paulo State Research Foundation - FAPESP (grant 2013/08183-7 to COF and 2013/07953-3 to AMC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparecida Maria Catai.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

COF contributed to the conception and experimental design, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, and final approval of the version to be published. TB contributed to the conception and experimental design, critical revision of the manuscript, analysis and interpretation of the data, and final approval of the version to be published. CF contributed to the conception and experimental design, final approval of the version to be published. NAP, VSB, ABS, AP, and BGB contributed to the experimental design, critical revision of the manuscript, and the final approval of the version to be published. AMC contributed to the conception and experimental design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript revision/editing, and final approval of the version to be published.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Francisco, C., Beltrame, T., Ferraresi, C. et al. Evaluation of acute effect of light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy on muscle deoxygenation and pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in patients with diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16, 572 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1093-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1093-3

Keywords