Volume 16 Supplement 2

3rd International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference

Open Access

Software for spatial analysis and visualisation of cluster randomised trials - a review of available tools

  • Christopher Jarvis1,
  • Gian Luca Di Tanna1,
  • Neal Alexander1,
  • Karim Anaya-Izquierdo2 and
  • James Carpenter1, 3
Trials201516(Suppl 2):P34

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P34

Published: 16 November 2015

In this context we define spatial analysis to mean Statistical Inference which takes into account spatial data, including but not limited to spatial exploratory data analysis. Groups in a Cluster randomised trial (CRT) are often defined geographically, giving spatial structure to the data. Taking account of the spatial aspects in the design and analysis of such a trial is important as it may influence results. In addition, the hierarchical structure imposed by the design should be adjusted for in the analysis. Therefore selecting software for spatial analysis of CRTs necessitates the capacity to accommodate for both spatial and clustering effects.

The range of spatial software available is broad in focus and capabilities, with a plethora of options to choose from determining what tool to use is not necessarily straight forward. In the last decade due to rapid development of spatial methods in Statistical packages and the expansion of Statistical toolboxes in Geographical Information Systems there is substantial overlap in abilities.

This review provides a comparison of current software options offering spatial analytical and visualisation techniques. First giving a brief account of the numerous cartographic visualisation tools, then focusing on what differentiates the capabilities of the analytical software. In regards to the latter we'll give special attention to multi-level modelling in both a Frequentist and Bayesian framework. Therefore demonstrating the flexibility of the options now available for the Analysis of CRTs taking into account spatial aspects.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(2)
University of Bath
(3)
MRC CTU at UCL

Copyright

© Jarvis et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement