Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Improving communication of clinical trial results: plain English summaries in the NIHR journals library

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 1, 2
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :P192

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P192

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Health Research
  • Research Journal
  • Group Score
  • Clinical Trial Result
  • Future Practice

Background

Plain English summaries (PESs) are a valuable tool for making research findings available and accessible to patients and the public. They provide brief descriptions of research written in non-specialist language. The National Institute for Health Research Journals Library (NIHRJL) currently requires authors to provide a 250 word PES. This is published online as part of the final, open-access report. Practice varies among other funders and journals, some of whom employ independent external writers (IEWs) for this purpose.

Objectives

To compare ease of reading and understanding of PESs written by clinical trial teams and an IEW.

Methods

Forty reports undergoing the editorial process for the NIHRJL will be included in the study. The PES for each report will be revised by authors in line with detailed guidance and edited by an IEW.

Results

Ease of reading will be measured using the Flesch Reading Ease score. Scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate text that is easier to read. Ease of understanding will be assessed by asking public reviewers to read a selection of PESs and rate them from 1 (did not understand) to 4 (understood all). Statistical comparison of group scores will be reported.

Discussion

High quality PESs are a priority for dissemination of clinical trial results to patients and the public but it is currently unclear who is best placed to produce them. Results of this study will inform future practice for the NIHRJL and will be relevant to all agencies communicating trial findings to patients and the public.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute for Health Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Southampton, UK
(2)
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Copyright

© Kirkpatrick et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement