Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Training of staff within randomised controlled trials (RCTS) of health-care interventions: a systematic review of the literature

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :P186

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P186

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Systematic Review
  • Research Team
  • Systematic Organisation
  • Outcome Assessment
  • Trial Data

Introduction

It is imperative for staff involved in clinical trials to receive appropriate education and training relating to their particular roles to be able to fulfil GCP requirements and ensure successful trial conduct (ASCO, J Oncol Pract. 2008). However, little is known about the ways training is being provided to trial staff.

Aims

To investigate and summarize training methods currently used in RCTs of health-care interventions.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken to identify articles reporting methods and practices of staff training within RCTs. A set of codes was used for the systematic organisation of extracted data.

Results

7471 records were screened and 89 studies were identified; 78 (88%) focused on training in an individual RCT and 11 (12%) were network-based. Studies were mainly conducted in USA (55%) and internationally (27%). Most were multi-centre (94%) and funded by non-commercial funders (70%). Different combinations of live (face-to-face and remote) and recorded (text-based and multimedia) training methods were used. Training was mainly provided at a group-level (51%), by trainers from the research team (65%). Intervention delivery/fidelity (49%), protocol and trial-related procedures (39%), trial data (36%), patient recruitment (31%) and outcome assessment (18%) were the top five training objectives. Evaluation information was present in 88% of studies, however, a detailed evaluation was only given in 12% of them. Information on the cost of training was only reported in 4.5% of studies.

Conclusions

There is substantial variability in the reported training process across RCTs of various intervention types, disease areas and sample sizes.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Copyright

© Gravani et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement