Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 16 Supplement 2

3rd International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference

Can site performance be predicted? Results of an evaluation of the performance of a site selection questionnaire in five multicentre trials

Trials volume 16, Article number: P176 (2015) Cite this article

Background

Site Selection Questionnaires (SSQs) have evolved to become “best” practice for commercial and non-commercial clinical trials. There has been limited evaluation of such questionnaires, however, and there is no generally accepted tool or methodology for selecting suitable sites for inclusion in a trial. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit introduced a site selection questionnaire in 2010, this paper will present evaluation of the questionnaire’s performance in five trials.

Method

Sites expressing an interest in participating in one of the 5 trials were sent an SSQ for completion by the PI; responses were made available to the CI to use if they wished. Once recruitment started, questionnaire responses were assessed ‘blind’ to site and PI identifiers, using predefined criteria: not returned, pool of participants, staff resources, trials experience, competing trials, and equipoise.

Results

Overall in these 5 trials 421 questionnaires were sent out, and 155 sites selected. Results of the blinded assessment and agreement between this assessment and the CI will be presented and discussed. Site performance based on time to recruitment of first participant, and ratio of actual to target recruitment, will be compared for sites included and excluded based on the blind assessment.

Discussion

Site selection is a key element for quality and efficiency in clinical trials. Results from this evaluation contribute to the understanding of how a well developed Site Selection Questionnaire can improve selection of sites in large multicentre trials.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    Dawn Coleby, Diane Whitham & Lelia Duley

Authors
  1. Dawn Coleby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diane Whitham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lelia Duley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn Coleby.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coleby, D., Whitham, D. & Duley, L. Can site performance be predicted? Results of an evaluation of the performance of a site selection questionnaire in five multicentre trials. Trials 16, P176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P176

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicentre Trial
  • Trial Experience
  • Site Selection

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215