Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Statistical inference in randomized consent designs in the presence of Hawthorne

  • 1
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :P137

  • Published:


  • Public Health
  • Placebo
  • Ethical Issue
  • Intervention Trial
  • Distinct Group

Randomized consent designs have been advocated in some setting. It has been argued that the use of the randomized consent designs is justified as it eliminates the so-called Hawthorne effect in the control group. Besides the ethical issue in not informing the patients, there are other potentially serious issues regarding the confounding and resultant bias in treatment comparison. This is particularly so in behavioral intervention trials. There is not only the placebo effect, but also the so-called Hawthorn effect that could muddy the comparisons. Based on a randomized consent design with control and intervention which results in three distinct groups, this presentation will show using very simple statistical contrasts why unbiased comparison is impossible due to confounding and self-selection.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA


© Kim 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.