Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Text message reminders to improve questionnaire response rates in RCTs: findings from three randomised sub-studies

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :P103

  • Published:


  • Return Rate
  • Text Message
  • Trial Population
  • Main Trial
  • Treatment Effect Estimate


Valid treatment effect estimates in the analysis of RCTs using patient reported outcomes depend on adequate response rates. Losses to follow-up are often high, and inexpensive ways to improve retention are much sought.


To assess the effectiveness of reminders sent by SMS text messages before or after questionnaire distribution on patient response rate and time to response in a mental health trial population.


Three randomised sub-studies were embedded in the UK ACUDep trial at three follow-up points. 523 patients of 755 in the main trial consented to being contacted by text message and were randomised to a pre-questionnaire reminder or no reminder at 3 months, a pre-reminder or post-reminder at 6 months and a post-reminder or no reminder at 9 months. Chi square tests and time-to event analyses were used to assess attrition between groups.


Return rates for pre-reminder SMS were not significantly different at 3 months compared to no reminder (82.9% vs 84.7%, p=.580), but showed significantly lower response rates at 6 months compared to post-reminders (75.2% vs 83.2%, p=.025). Return rates following post-reminders did not significantly differ at 9 months from no reminders (77.1% vs 78.5%, p=.691). Median times to response ranged from 18 to 25 days, with only returns at 6 months being significantly superior for patients receiving post-reminders (log-rank test p=.044).


Overall, SMS text reminders did not appear to substantially improve patient response rates, although the pattern of effects for reminders sent before or after questionnaire distribution was inconclusive.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of York, York, UK
Sydera Research Associates, Market Weighton, UK


© Keding et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.