Skip to main content

Designing, implementing and analysing a virtual trial

Background

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a common eye condition that can cause severe sight loss and blindness. Active disease is treated monthly until it becomes inactive, but regular monitoring by a hospital ophthalmologist is required as reactivation is common. The ECHoES trial was designed to assess whether, after appropriate training, community optometrists could make decisions about nAMD reactivation, to the same standard as hospital ophthalmologists.

Methods

ECHoES was a non-inferiority virtual trial that utilised an existing repository of images and data collected during the IVAN trial to create 288 patient profiles (vignettes). In a balanced incomplete block design, 96 participants (48 ophthalmologists and 48 optometrists) each reviewed 42 randomly allocated vignettes in a pre-determined order. Each vignette was viewed by 7 ophthalmologists and 7 optometrists.

The primary outcome was correct classification of nAMD reactivation, compared to a reference standard. Data were analysed using mixed model logistic regression, with professional group and vignette-order fitted as fixed effects, and participant and vignette as random effects. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10% assuming ophthalmologists would correctly assess 95% of their vignettes (0.298 on the log-odds scale).

Results

Optometrists and ophthalmologists correctly classified 1702/2016 (84.4%) and 1722/2016 (85.4%) vignettes respectively (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.25, p=0.543).

Conclusion

The ability of optometrists to make nAMD retreatment decisions is non-inferior to that of ophthalmologists. The ECHoES trial was designed in response to a rapid trials funding call and is an example of an efficient trial with a novel design.

Acknowledgement and disclaimer

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 11/129/195). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA, NIHR, NHS or Department of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren J Scott.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, L.J., Reeves, B.C., Chakravarthy, U. et al. Designing, implementing and analysing a virtual trial. Trials 16, O82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O82

Download citation

Keywords

  • Macular Degeneration
  • Incomplete Block
  • Balance Incomplete Block Design
  • Community Optometrist
  • Efficient Trial