Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Testosterone replacement in young male cancer survivors (TRYMS) - pragmatic adaptation of trial design for a trial struggling with recruitment

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Trials201516(Suppl 2):O79

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O79

Published: 16 November 2015

Keywords

  • Testosterone
  • Testosterone Level
  • Trial Design
  • Functioning Score
  • Control Phase

TRYMS is a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, parallel group, placebo controlled phase IV trial in young male cancer survivors with low testosterone levels. The trial is designed to investigate whether testosterone treatment for 26 weeks will result in a reduction of truncal fat mass and increase in participant-reported physical functioning scores.

The general consensus worldwide is that testosterone levels ≤12nmol/L are deemed to be low; however a previous study of 200 healthy volunteers found that testosterone≤10nmol/L would be deemed to be low. The trial team considered only including patients with testosterone≤10nmol/L but acknowledged this would leave an evidence gap for patients with testosterone between 10-12nmol/L. Therefore TRYMS was designed to determine whether testosterone replacement is effective in men with low testosterone and with borderline low testosterone by powering the study to look at each subgroup individually. A sample size of 268 participants was required after accounting for imbalanced recruitment to the subgroups.

However, opening TRYMS took longer than anticipated and recruitment was substantially slower than expected; the trial design was adapted to combine the subgroups for primary analysis, reducing the minimum sample size to 112 participants. The trial was granted a recruitment extension and continued to recruit beyond the minimum sample size to maximise precision of the treatment effect estimates in each subgroup; this analysis is exploratory but still considered useful to inform clinical practice. This adaption of the trial design was a pragmatic approach for a trial struggling with recruitment, whilst still able to provide clinically useful results.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK
(2)
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Copyright

© Smith et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement