Volume 16 Supplement 2

3rd International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference

Open Access

Evaluating the use of real-time data collection using SMS texts in the SIMS study

  • Tracey Davidson1,
  • Alison McDonald1,
  • Gladys McPherson1 and
  • John Norrie1
Trials201516(Suppl 2):O65

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O65

Published: 16 November 2015

Background

A recent innovation in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) collection is the use of SMS texts.1 Results from a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) found this real-time data collection was both feasible and acceptable.

As part of the multicentre NIHR HTA funded SIMS study (Adjustable Anchored Single-Incision Mini-Slings Versus Standard Tension-Free Mid-Urethral Slings in the Surgical Management Of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence; A Pragmatic Multicentre Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial), we evaluated responses to a post-surgery pain diary comparing PROs collected via texts and paper. The study raised several interesting data collection.

Method

Participants (n= 189) were provided with a pain diary to complete on the 14-days post-surgery. If participants consented to receive texts, they also received daily texts to report their pain score and any painkillers taken. Responses to texts were free of charge.

Results

Results will be presented reporting response rates and comparison between pain scores between participants responding in both modes. The number of text responses that could not be matched to a text question will also be reported.

Discussion

Texts were an acceptable mode of response to participants with over 66% (n=126) responding by text. The number of responses reported in both modes that were identical and a possible explanation of the discrepancy will be discussed.

Data collection challenges will also be discussed including: where responses cannot be matched to a text question what happens with the unmatched data? If there is a discrepancy between participant's responses in both modes which data do you use?

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Aberdeen

Copyright

© Davidson et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement