Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Investigation of the shortcomings of the consort 2010 statement for the reporting of group sequential randomised controlled trials

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Trials201516(Suppl 2):O53

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O53

Published: 16 November 2015

Keywords

  • Adaptive Design
  • Interim Result
  • Consort Statement
  • Scientific Rigour
  • Operational Bias

Background

It could be argued that adaptive designs are underused in clinical trials research. However, of the adaptive trials that have been undertaken there are concerns which could be linked to inadequate reporting of trial conduct. We examined compliance in the reporting of group sequential randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the issues.

Methods

We undertook a systematic review by searching Ovid MEDLINE (01/01/2001 to 23/09/2014), supplemented with RCTs from an audit study. We included parallel group, confirmatory, group sequential RCTs that were prospectively designed using a Frequentist approach. Eligible RCTs were examined for reporting compliance against the CONSORT 2010 checklist. Proposed modifications were added to capture group sequential aspects such as use statistical bias correction due to early stopping.

Results

24% (68/284) RCTs were eligible; most were published in high impact journals. We found that 46(68%) were stopped early, predominantly either for futility or efficacy. Group sequential aspects were largely inadequately reported. Only 7% (3/46) RCTs which stopped early reported use of statistical bias correction. 52(76%) RCTs failed to disclose methods used to minimise the risk of operational bias through the knowledge or leaking of interim results. Suboptimal compliance was found in items relating to: access to trial protocols: randomisation methods; details of randomisation concealment, and its implementation. Changes to trial methods and outcomes could not be determined in most trials, due to inaccessible protocols and amendments.

Conclusions

Suboptimal reporting may lead to researchers questioning the robustness of trial conclusions of RCTs that stop early to change practice. Modification of the CONSORT statement to incorporate adaptive designs could be helpful. Assurance of scientific rigour through transparent and adequate reporting is paramount to the acceptability of findings from adaptive RCTs.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
(2)
The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
(3)
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK

Copyright

© Dimairo et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement