Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 16 Supplement 2

3rd International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference

Can we implement findings from RCTs of diagnostic tests? A review of reporting of test-treat interventions

Trials volume 16, Article number: O31 (2015) Cite this article

Objective

To evaluate the completeness of intervention descriptions in test-treatment RCTs.

Methods

Reports of published RCTs of diagnostic tests evaluating patient outcomes published 2004-2007 were identified in CENTRAL. Two raters assessed trial reports for the presence of care pathway diagrams and for the completeness of written descriptions. Test-treat interventions descriptions were considered in their four components: 1) the test, 2) diagnosis decision-making, 3) management decision-making, and 4) interventions.

Findings

103 trials evaluating 105 control and 119 experimental interventions were included from cardiovascular medicine (35, 34%), obstetrics and gynaecology (17, 17%), gastroenterology (14, 14%) or orthopaedics (10%, 10). Trials evaluated imaging (52, 50%), biochemical assays (25, 21%) and clinical assessment (13, 11%).

Only 3 (3%) trials mentioned all four components in descriptions of the interventions, only one of which also provided a complete care pathway diagram. Descriptions were missing or incomplete for: 42% of experimental and 71% of control tests, 57% of experimental and 71% of control diagnostic decision-making, 74% of experimental and 73% of control management planning, and 80% and 86% interventions.

Conclusions

Reporting of test-treat interventions is very poor and worse than for other complex interventions. Current descriptions are inadequate for implementing results of these trials into clinical practice. Reporting needs to improve, with greater emphasis on describing the decision-making components of the care pathways in pragmatic as well as explanatory trials. Expansion of the TiDIER checklist for test-treat trials is required.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Jac Dinnes, Sian Phillips-Taylor, Clare Davenport & Jon Deeks

  2. University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Chris Hyde

  3. University of Warwick, Warwick, UK

    Sian Phillips-Taylor

Authors
  1. Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jac Dinnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sian Phillips-Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clare Davenport
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chris Hyde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jon Deeks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Deeks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrante di Ruffano, L., Dinnes, J., Phillips-Taylor, S. et al. Can we implement findings from RCTs of diagnostic tests? A review of reporting of test-treat interventions. Trials 16, O31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O31

Download citation

Keywords

  • Diagnostic Test
  • Control Management
  • Great Emphasis
  • Complex Intervention
  • Control Test

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215