Skip to content


  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Can we implement findings from RCTs of diagnostic tests? A review of reporting of test-treat interventions

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :O31

  • Published:


  • Diagnostic Test
  • Control Management
  • Great Emphasis
  • Complex Intervention
  • Control Test


To evaluate the completeness of intervention descriptions in test-treatment RCTs.


Reports of published RCTs of diagnostic tests evaluating patient outcomes published 2004-2007 were identified in CENTRAL. Two raters assessed trial reports for the presence of care pathway diagrams and for the completeness of written descriptions. Test-treat interventions descriptions were considered in their four components: 1) the test, 2) diagnosis decision-making, 3) management decision-making, and 4) interventions.


103 trials evaluating 105 control and 119 experimental interventions were included from cardiovascular medicine (35, 34%), obstetrics and gynaecology (17, 17%), gastroenterology (14, 14%) or orthopaedics (10%, 10). Trials evaluated imaging (52, 50%), biochemical assays (25, 21%) and clinical assessment (13, 11%).

Only 3 (3%) trials mentioned all four components in descriptions of the interventions, only one of which also provided a complete care pathway diagram. Descriptions were missing or incomplete for: 42% of experimental and 71% of control tests, 57% of experimental and 71% of control diagnostic decision-making, 74% of experimental and 73% of control management planning, and 80% and 86% interventions.


Reporting of test-treat interventions is very poor and worse than for other complex interventions. Current descriptions are inadequate for implementing results of these trials into clinical practice. Reporting needs to improve, with greater emphasis on describing the decision-making components of the care pathways in pragmatic as well as explanatory trials. Expansion of the TiDIER checklist for test-treat trials is required.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
University of Warwick, Warwick, UK


© Ferrante di Ruffano et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.