Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Researchers' experiences of optimising complex health interventions before full-scale RCTs: results from an exploratory multiple case study

  • Sara Levati1,
  • Suzanne Hagen1,
  • Cam Donaldson3 and
  • Mary Wells2
Trials201516(Suppl 2):O29

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O29

Published: 16 November 2015

Keywords

Health Service ResearchFinancial ConstraintOptimisation StudyMain DataCollection Strategy

Background

Given the current financial constraints upon health services research and the failure of many trials to establish whether the lack of intervention effect is due to sub-optimal intervention design or implementation failure, it is increasingly important to consider pre-trial methods that a) provide leads on how the intervention works, and b) help maximise chances for the intervention to be effective. However, the decision-making processes of, and specific benefits associated with conducting pre-trial optimisation studies are still unclear. This multiple case study was conducted to gain researchers' experiences and views of the process of optimising complex health interventions.

Methods

This exploratory multiple case study focused on a spectrum of different types of complex interventions. A scoping review conducted in advance informed the design, sampling and methods adopted. A total of 15 cases were explored in-depth, using semi-structured interviews as the main data collection strategy.

Results

Among the main benefits, optimisation processes allowed researchers to anticipate the potential effects of the intervention and to establish whether to embark on a costly full-scale RCT. However, the usefulness of optimisation may be limited by the assumptions and hypothetical circumstances on which processes are often based. Decisions about which optimisation methods to adopt are influenced by several elements, including the evidence available, the experience of the research team, the target of the intervention (i.e. single individuals or groups), and the mechanisms of action of the intervention.

Conclusions

The findings will inform the development of optimisation study guidelines for researchers striving to develop effective complex health interventions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
(2)
NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
(3)
Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Copyright

© Levati et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement