Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Oral presentation
  • Open Access

Meandering journey towards routine trial adaptation: survey results on barriers to use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Trials201516 (Suppl 2) :O20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O20

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Public Funder
  • Practical Knowledge
  • Adaptive Design
  • Clinical Trial Research
  • Confirmatory Trial

Background

Adaptive designs (ADs) are innovative alternative trial designs with the potential to improve efficiency in clinical trials research when used appropriately. Despite this, their implementation has been slow to gain traction. This study explored barriers, concerns and potential facilitators to appropriate use of ADs in confirmatory trials.

Methods

Based upon themes drawn from in-depth interviews of key research stakeholders, we undertook cross-sectional, online surveys (November 2014 to January 2015) of; CTUs, public funders and industry in the UK. Observed response rates were: 55% (30/55) CTUs, 68% (17/25) industry, and 41% (86/212) public funders. We employed Rating Scale Modelling [5] to rank the perceived importance of barriers and concerns for prioritisation.

Results

Most important perceived barriers to adoption in the public sector included: the lack of bridge funding to support design developmental work of time consuming ADs, dearth of practical knowledge and experience, lack of applied training to facilitate practical learning, preference for traditional designs, time constraints to support planning, insufficient access to case studies, difficulties in marketing ADs to key research stakeholders and associated practical complexities.

Respondents' perceptions of ADs were consistent across industry. The exceptions, including bridge funding support, inadequate data management infrastructure and regulatory fear, were probably reflections of differential organisational structures, experience, and type of research interventions.

Conclusions

There are multifaceted barriers and concerns to the appropriate use of ADs most of which are intertwined with lack of practical knowledge and experience. Learning from “pacesetters” through applied training and accessible publication of ADs undertaken coupled with adequate transparent reporting is paramount. There is an urgent need for a practical toolkit of design specific questions researchers need to ask themselves when considering planning particular ADs and a consensus guidance document on ADs tailored for publicly funded confirmatory trials.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
(2)
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK

Copyright

© Dimairo et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement