Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 16 Supplement 2

3rd International Clinical Trials Methodology Conference

Reading or listening to review summaries - which method will produce greater understanding of the key outcomes in a cochrane review?

Trials volume 16, Article number: O2 (2015) Cite this article

Background

Systematic reviews are key to the dissemination of the findings of clinical trials and many readers might access nothing more than a summary of these reviews. Therefore, it is essential that these summaries are clear, understandable and accessible. We explored whether readers understand key messages without having to read the full review, and if there were differences in understanding between various types of summary, including an audio podcast.

Methods

We selected four Cochrane Reviews:

  • 1. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work

  • 2. Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function

  • 3. Surgery for weight loss in adults

  • 4. Dance movement therapy for depression

Potential participants were contacted via University and organisational mailing lists. Those who wished to take part were asked to select one of the four reviews. After answering a question about what they thought the key finding of the review would be, they were randomly assigned one of four summaries of the review: abstract, plain language summary, audio podcast or transcript of the podcast. They were asked to spend no more than 15 minutes reading or listening to the summary, before answering again the question about the key findings and to indicate whether they would now want to read the full Cochrane Review.

Results

This research is currently underway and final results will be presented at the conference.

Conclusion

This study repeats our previous SWAR -2 study with a new set of reviews, which suggested better understanding with the audio podcast.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

    Lisa Maguire, Mike Clarke & Mark Tully

  2. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Lisa Maguire

Authors
  1. Lisa Maguire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Tully
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Maguire.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maguire, L., Clarke, M. & Tully, M. Reading or listening to review summaries - which method will produce greater understanding of the key outcomes in a cochrane review?. Trials 16, O2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-O2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Clinical Trial
  • Systematic Review
  • Potential Participant
  • Great Understanding
  • Cochrane Review

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215