We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.
The use of early decision modelling and value of information analysis in an adaptive trial design: results from the OPTIMA preliminary study
- Published: 16 November 2015
Keywords
- Trial Design
- Decision Modelling
- Design Decision
- Reimbursement Decision
- Informative Tool
Background
The use of decision modelling early in the research and development process for new healthcare technologies may improve research efficiency. Value of information analysis (VOIA) provides a useful tool for assessing the value of conducting further research.
Objective
To test the feasibility of early modelling within an adaptive randomised controlled trial (RCT), where analysis of preliminary trial data is used to inform a stop-go decision and subsequent trial design.
Methods
The OPTIMA prelim trial randomised patients with early breast cancer to standard care or test-directed care using Oncotype DX. Additional testing was conducted using five alternative competing multi-parameter tests. A probabilistic decision model was built to assess the cost-effectiveness. VOIA was used to assess the optimal ongoing research strategy to inform an NHS reimbursement decision.
Results
302 patients were randomised and available for analysis. The cost-effectiveness results suggested multi-parameter tumour testing was likely to be cost-effective. VOIA was able to prioritise tests for inclusion within the ongoing RCT despite the rapid turnaround time required for analysis. The results were highly dependent on modelling assumptions that were unavoidable early in the test development pipeline. Despite difficulties in communicating the unfamiliar concepts underpinning VOIA to the Trial Management Group, it was seen as an informative tool that influenced design decisions.
Conclusion
Early economic decision modelling and VOIA provides a novel approach to aid the trial design decision making process. It should be considered in future research proposals as a means of improving the return on public research investment within the NHS.
Authors’ Affiliations
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.