- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Completeness of outcome description in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews
Trials volume 16, Article number: P24 (2015)
We aimed to assess the frequency and completeness of outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs), focusing on evaluations of the efficacy and safety of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical LBP.
Materials and methods
We performed a cross-sectional study of all RCTs included in all Cochrane SRs (full-text) published on The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in February 2013. Two authors independently evaluated the type and frequency of each outcome measure reported in the full-text of RCTs, the methods used to measure outcomes, and the proportion of outcomes fully replicable based on the reported information (Figure 1).
Our literature search identified 11 Cochrane SRs, including 185 RCTs. Across all RCTs, thirty-six different outcomes were investigated. The outcomes most commonly reported were pain (165/185; 89,2%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 84.7% – 93.7 %), disability (118/185; 63,8%, 95% CI 56.9% – 70.7 %), range of motion (72/185; 38.9%95% CI 31.9% – 45.9%), and quality of life (45/185; 24,3%, 95% CI 18.1% – 30.5%) measured respectively by 70, 43, 41, 19 different measurement instruments (Figure 2). The procedure of blinding assessment was reported in 49.7% of the RCTs for pain (n= 82 RCTs) and 45% of RCTs for disability (n=53 RCTs). Pain, disability, range of motion, and quality of life outcomes were reported as fully replicable in 10.3% (n= 17 RCTs), 10.1% (n= 12 RCTs), 5.5% (n= 4 RCTs), and 6.6% (n= 3 RCTs) of the RCTs, respectively (Figure 3).
A large number of outcome measures and a myriad of measurement instruments were used across all RCTs. The reporting was largely incomplete, suggesting better opportunities for the standardization of approaches and reporting.
Coster WJ: Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013, 67 (2): 162-170. 10.5014/ajot.2013.006015.
Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ: Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2011, 36 (21 Suppl): S54-68.
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G: Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998, 23 (18): 2003-2013. 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018. (Phila Pa 1976)
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Castellini, G., Gianola, S., Frigerio, P. et al. Completeness of outcome description in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews. Trials 16 (Suppl 1), P24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S1-P24
- Confidence Interval
- Clinical Trial
- Systematic Review
- Back Pain
- Literature Search