Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The effect of antihypertensive agents on sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Fábio Tremea Cichelero1,
  • Denis Martinez1,
  • Sandra Costa Fuchs1,
  • Miguel Gus2,
  • Leila Beltrami Moreira1 and
  • Flávio Danni Fuchs1, 2Email author
Trials201415:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-1

Received: 6 August 2013

Accepted: 16 December 2013

Published: 2 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension are well-known cardiovascular risk factors. Their control could reduce the burden of heart disease across populations. Several drugs are used to control hypertension, but the only consistently effective treatment of OSA is continuous positive airway pressure. The identification of a drug capable of improving OSA and hypertension simultaneously would provide a novel approach in the treatment of both diseases.

Methods/Design

This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial, comparing the use of chlorthalidone with amiloride versus amlodipine as a first drug option in patients older than 40 years of age with stage I hypertension (140 to 159/90 to 99 mmHg) and moderate OSA (15 to 30 apneas/hour of sleep). The primary outcomes are the variation of the number of apneas per hour and blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The secondary outcomes are adverse events, somnolence scale (Epworth), ventilatory parameters and C reactive protein levels. The follow-up will last 8 weeks. There will be 29 participants per group. The project has been approved by the ethics committee of our institution.

Discussion

The role of fluid retention in OSA has been known for several decades. The use of diuretics are well established in treating hypertension but have never been appropriately tested for sleep apnea. As well as testing the efficacy of these drugs, this study will help to understand the mechanisms that link hypertension and sleep apnea and their treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01896661

Keywords

Sleep apneaHypertensionTreatmentDiureticsChlorthalidoneAmlodipine

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a well-known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of secondary hypertension [1, 2]. About 30% of the population suffers from OSA and it is moderate to severe (more than 15 apneas/hour of sleep) in 16.9% of adults [3]. OSA is observed in 30% to 80% of hypertensive patients [4]. We demonstrated that 38% of patients with controlled hypertension have OSA, in contrast to 71% of patients with resistant hypertension [5]. Each episode of apnea/hour increases the risk of hypertension by 4% [6].

The association between OSA and hypertension has been disregarded by clinicians and even by researchers of hypertension [7]. The high cost and low availability of the golden standard method for diagnosing OSA, full polysomnography, may be one of the reasons [8, 9]. The use of portable devices, which have been validated in our laboratory, could circumvent this limitation, since they have reasonable sensitivity (96%) and specificity (64%) [10].

The standard treatment for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and 46 clinical trials show the benefits [11]. It has also been shown in randomized clinical trials that CPAP lowers blood pressure, particularly in patients with hypertension [12]. Blood pressure decreased by 7.8/5.3 mmHg in the 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with OSA and hypertension, but did not decrease in those without OSA [13]. The efficacy of CPAP in patients with milder forms of OSA is still unproven [14], which could be secondary to the low adherence in the use of the method. Other therapies could be beneficial in such patients [15].

A Cochrane review, which identified 26 clinical trials of 21 drugs totaling 394 patients, failed to identify any pharmacological treatment with consistent efficacy. Some drugs, like fluticasone, mirtazapine, physostigmine and nasal lubricants, seem to reduce the number of apneas, but the trials were small and had methodological limitations, precluding the use of these drugs in clinical practice [15]. It has been suggested that drug therapy must be tailored to the mechanism of OSA identified in each patient [15].

An extravascular fluid shift has been implicated in the physiopathology of OSA. During the night, a shift of fluids from the legs causes an increase in neck circumference, peripharyngeal pressure and upper airway collapsibility [1619]. Almost 60 years ago an increase of 0.5 cm in the size of the earlobes during sleep was described [20]. The application of lower body pressure of 40 mmHg using antishock trousers reduces leg fluid volume and increases neck circumference and the resistance of the pharynx [18].

Patients with controlled hypertension underwent a reduction of 175 mL in leg volume and an increase of 1.0 cm in neck circumference after sleeping, in comparison with a leg volume reduction of 346.7 mL and an increase in the neck circumference of 1.5 cm in patients with resistant hypertension [21]. The leg volume shift is positively correlated to the number of apneas (R 2 = 0.56) [21]. CPAP reduced the increase in neck size proportional to the reduction in the number of apneas, but it did not prevent the leg volume change [19].

Sympathetic renal ablation with radio-frequency waves reduced blood pressure by 33/11 mmHg in 6 months [22]. It also reduced the number of apneas/hour from 16.3 to 4.5 for ten patients with resistant hypertension and OSA [23], an effect that was attributed to the promotion of salt excretion and total body fluid reduction [23]. Spironolactone led to a reduction from 39.8 to 22.0 apneas/hour after 8 weeks of treatment of 12 patients with resistant hypertension [24]. There is no controlled study exploring the concept that these drugs may act through total body fluid reduction.

In the ALLHAT trial, chlorthalidone, lisinopril and amlodipine had comparable efficacy in the prevention of coronary heart disease [25]. The diuretic, however, was superior to lisinopril in the prevention of strokes and amlodipine in the prevention of heart failure [25]. There is evidence that the efficacy in the prevention of events is related to the magnitude of the blood pressure reduction [25, 26].

The main adverse event for chlorthalidone is hypokalemia, which blunted the efficacy of the treatment in the SHEP trial [27] and increased serum glucose levels [28]. The use of amiloride, a physiological aldosterone antagonist, could ameliorate this adverse effect. This potassium-sparing diuretic was effective and well tolerated in a randomized trial performed by our group [29].

Amlodipine was more effective than valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, in the prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke in the VALUE trial [30]. In the ACCOMPLISH trial, the combination benazepril-amlodipine was more effective in the prevention of composite cardiovascular events than the combination benazepril-hydrochlorothiazide [31]. There is no evidence that amlodipine influences the balance of fluids, and edema is one of its main adverse effects.

Overall the evidence shows that chlorthalidone and amlodipine are the most effective drugs for the initial treatment of hypertension. Their use in OSA has not been appropriately tested to date. Thus, a trial testing the efficacy of these drugs to control both blood pressure and sleep apnea is warranted. Such a trial could contribute to our understanding of the relation between hypertension, fluid levels, hypoxia and OSA.

Rationale

OSA has been associated with fluid retention, which accumulates in the pharynx facilitating its collapse, generating intermittent hypoxia and increasing sympathetic activity and blood pressure. CPAP alleviates apnea, which reduces sympathetic activity, reducing blood pressure and increasing salt and water excretion. Sympathetic renal ablation promotes salt and water excretion, reducing systemic sympathetic activity and total body water (including the pharynx), thus alleviating apnea. Diuretics could be a new way to abort this vicious cycle by promoting the direct excretion of salt and water.

Research question

Is chlorthalidone with amiloride effective in the treatment of OSA in comparison to amlodipine in patients with OSA and hypertension?

Methods/design

This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial, controlled by an active treatment.

Eligible participants

Eligible participants are patients older than 40 years of age with stage I hypertension (140 to 159/90 to 99 mmHg) and moderate OSA (15 to 30 apneas/hour of sleep).

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded if they have a low life expectancy, other indications for the use of diuretics or calcium channel blockers, intolerance or contraindications to the study drugs, cardiovascular disease (heart failure or recent – within three months – myocardial infarction or stroke), secondary hypertension or participated in another clinical trial in the previous 6 months or if they are pregnant or use more than one drug for hypertension.

Random allocation

Randomization will be done using a list generated by validated software (a random allocator), with a block size of four.

Interventions

The interventions are chlorthalidone plus amiloride 25 mg and 5 mg daily, respectively, versus amlodipine 10 mg daily, taken in the morning.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes

  1. 1.

    Number of apneas/hour (apnea-hypopnea index)

     
  2. 2.

    Blood pressure

     

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1.

    Adverse events

     
  2. 2.

    Somnolence scale (Epworth)

     
  3. 3.

    Respiratory parameters

     
  4. 4.

    C reactive protein

     

Follow-up and duration of the study

There will be outpatient clinical visits for evaluation at enrollment and week 8 of treatment. Figure 1 is a flow chart for the selection, interventions, follow-up and outcomes.
Figure 1

Flow chart of selection, interventions and outcomes.

Assessment of outcomes

The number of apneas/hour will be measured at the baseline and follow-up by type III portable polysomnography (Somnocheck, Weinmann GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), which was validated by us [10]. Average blood pressure (two measurements using a validated automatic electronic device) and ambulatory blood pressure (Spacelabs 90207, Spacelabs, Redmond, WA) will be measured at the baseline and follow-up.

Sleepiness will be measured using the Epworth somnolence scale at the baseline and follow-up. It records the likelihood that someone will fall sleep during eight daily activities (sitting and reading, watching television, sitting in a public space, being passenger in a car for 1 hour, lying down in the afternoon, sitting and talking to someone, sitting after a meal without alcohol and stopped in a car for few minutes).

Adverse events will be investigated using open questions and a semi-structured questionnaire, with questions on general symptoms and the presumed adverse effects of the drugs used in the trial. Standard laboratory tests will be used to identify adverse events, such as hypokalemia and elevated glucose levels. C-reactive protein levels will be determined as well.

Wash-out

Patients taking an antihypertensive drug will need to stop it for 2 weeks prior to the study to be confirmed for eligibility, to allow time for most of the effects of the blood pressure drug to vanish [32].

Control of adherence

Adherence will be check by counting pills.

Sample size calculation

For a mean of 20 apneas/hour at the baseline and a reduction of 7 apneas/hour, with a standard deviation of 9 apneas/hour, power of 80% and P alpha of 5%, 26 patients will be required per group. The sample will be increased by 10% to account for possible losses in follow-up, so that 58 patients need to be randomized.

Statistics

Differences between variables for the groups will be analyzed with chi-squared tests for categorical and Student’s t tests for continuous variables. Confounding will be controlled with logistic regression and multiple linear regression models.

Ethical approval

The project and the informed consent form were approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, which is accredited by the Office of Human Research Protections as an Institutional Review Board. All participants will be asked to sign the informed consent form prior to participation in the study.

Trial status

The trial is currently recruiting patients.

Abbreviations

CPAP: 

Continuous positive airway pressure

OSA: 

Obstructive sleep apnea.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by a grant from the FIPE, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Postgraduate Studies Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
(2)
Division of Cardiology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

References

  1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Roccella EJ, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee: The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003, 289: 2560-2572. 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, Grassi G, Heagerty AM, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Narkiewicz K, Ruilope L, Rynkiewicz A, Schmieder RE, Struijker Boudier HA, Zanchetti A, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P: 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007, 28: 1462-1536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tufik S, Santos-Silva R, Taddei JA, Bittencourt LR: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in the Sao Paulo Epidemiologic Sleep Study. Sleep Med. 2010, 11: 441-446. 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Silverberg D, Oksenberg A, Iaina A: The Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure and obstructive sleep apnea: let their silence not be matched by the silence of the ordinary physician. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158: 1272-1273. 10.1001/archinte.158.11.1272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Goncalves SC, Martinez D, Gus M, De Abreu-Silva EO, Bertoluci C, Dutra I, Branchi T, Moreira LB, Fuchs SC, De Oliveira AC, Fuchs FD: Obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: a case–control study. Chest. 2007, 132: 1858-1862. 10.1378/chest.07-1170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Young T, Peppard P, Palta M, Hla KM, Finn L, Morgan B, Skatrud J: Population-based study of sleep-disordered breathing as a risk factor for hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 1997, 157: 1746-1752. 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440360178019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Silverberg DS, Oksenberg A, Iaina A: Sleep related breathing disorders are common contributing factors to the production of essential hypertension but are neglected, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Am J Hypertens. 1997, 10: 1319-1325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fletcher EC, DeBehnke RD, Lovoi MS, Gorin AB: Undiagnosed sleep apnea in patients with essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1985, 103: 190-195. 10.7326/0003-4819-103-2-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stoohs R, Guilleminault C: MESAM 4: an ambulatory device for the detection of patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Chest. 1992, 101: 1221-1227. 10.1378/chest.101.5.1221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. De Oliveira AC T, Martinez D, Vasconcelos LF, Goncalves SC, Lenz MC, Fuchs SC, Gus M, Abreu-Silva EO, Moreira LB, Fuchs FD: Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and its outcomes with home portable monitoring. Chest. 2009, 135: 330-336. 10.1378/chest.08-1859.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Balk EM, Moorthy D, Obadan NO, Patel K, Ip S, Chung M, Bannuru RR, Kitsios GD, Sen S, Iovin RC: Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. 2011, Rockville, MD: AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness ReviewsGoogle Scholar
  12. Pepperell JC, Ramdassingh-Dow S, Crosthwaite N, Mullins R, Jenkinson C, Stradling JR, Davies RJ: Ambulatory blood pressure after therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised parallel trial. Lancet. 2002, 359: 204-210. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07445-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hla KM, Skatrud JB, Finn L, Palta M, Young T: The effect of correction of sleep-disordered breathing on BP in untreated hypertension. Chest. 2002, 122: 1125-1132. 10.1378/chest.122.4.1125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wright J, Johns R, Watt I, Melville A, Sheldon T: Health effects of obstructive sleep apnoea and the effectiveness of continuous positive airways pressure: a systematic review of the research evidence. BMJ. 1997, 314: 851-860. 10.1136/bmj.314.7084.851.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith I, Lasserson TJ, Wright J: Drug therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, CD003002-Google Scholar
  16. Chiu KL, Ryan CM, Shiota S, Ruttanaumpawan P, Arzt M, Haight JS, Chan CT, Floras JS, Bradley TD: Fluid shift by lower body positive pressure increases pharyngeal resistance in healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 174: 1378-1383. 10.1164/rccm.200607-927OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Redolfi S, Yumino D, Ruttanaumpawan P, Yau B, Su MC, Lam J, Bradley TD: Relationship between overnight rostral fluid shift and obstructive sleep apnea in nonobese men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009, 179: 241-246. 10.1164/rccm.200807-1076OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Su MC, Chiu KL, Ruttanaumpawan P, Shiota S, Yumino D, Redolfi S, Haight JS, Bradley TD: Lower body positive pressure increases upper airway collapsibility in healthy subjects. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008, 161: 306-312. 10.1016/j.resp.2008.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yumino D, Redolfi S, Ruttanaumpawan P, Su MC, Smith S, Newton GE, Mak S, Bradley TD: Nocturnal rostral fluid shift: a unifying concept for the pathogenesis of obstructive and central sleep apnea in men with heart failure. Circulation. 2010, 121: 1598-1605. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.902452.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Verel D: Observations on the effect of posture on the distribution of tissue fluid in the face. J Physiol. 1955, 130: 72-78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman O, Bradley TD, Chan CT, Parkes R, Logan AG: Relationship between overnight rostral fluid shift and obstructive sleep apnea in drug-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2010, 56: 1077-1082. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.154427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Symplicity HTNI, Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Bohm M: Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (the Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010, 376: 1903-1909.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Witkowski A, Prejbisz A, Florczak E, Kadziela J, Sliwinski P, Bielen P, Michalowska I, Kabat M, Warchol E, Januszewicz M, Narkiewicz K, Somers VK, Sobotka PA, Januszewicz A: Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnea course, and glycemic control in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2011, 58: 559-565. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.173799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaddam K, Pimenta E, Thomas SJ, Cofield SS, Oparil S, Harding SM, Calhoun DA: Spironolactone reduces severity of obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with resistant hypertension: a preliminary report. J Hum Hypertens. 2010, 24: 532-537. 10.1038/jhh.2009.96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Officers A: Coordinators for the ACRGTA, lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack T: major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002, 288: 2981-2997. 10.1001/jama.288.23.2981.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L: Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001, 358: 1305-1315. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06411-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Franse LV, Pahor M, Di Bari M, Somes GW, Cushman WC, Applegate WB: Hypokalemia associated with diuretic use and cardiovascular events in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Hypertension. 2000, 35: 1025-1030. 10.1161/01.HYP.35.5.1025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zillich AJ, Garg J, Basu S, Bakris GL, Carter BL: Thiazide diuretics, potassium, and the development of diabetes: a quantitative review. Hypertension. 2006, 48: 219-224. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000231552.10054.aa.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Guerrero P, Fuchs FD, Moreira LM, Martins VM, Bertoluci C, Fuchs SC, Gus M: Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of amiloride versus enalapril as add-on drugs in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure receiving hydrochlorothiazide. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2008, 30: 553-564. 10.1080/10641960802441906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, Brunner HR, Ekman S, Hansson L, Hua T, Laragh J, McInnes GT, Mitchell L, Plat F, Schork A, Smith B, Zanchetti A, Value trial group: Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004, 363: 2022-2031. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16451-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlof B, Pitt B, Shi V, Hester A, Gupte J, Gatlin M, Velazquez EJ, Investigators AT: Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 2417-2428. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Girvin BG, Johnston GD: Comparison of the effects of a 7-day period of non-compliance on blood pressure control using three different antihypertensive agents. J Hypertens. 2004, 22: 1409-1414. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000125440.28861.d6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cichelero et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement